Submitted:
02 January 2025
Posted:
06 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Research Gap and Motivation
1.2. Research Objective
- Operator performance: Evaluated improvements in skill levels and productivity.
- Lead time: Measured reductions in training duration and process optimization.
- Efficiency: Assessed operational workflows and resource utilization.
- Customer satisfaction: Considered indirect outcomes linked to enhanced workforce capabilities.
- Innovation: Explored the framework’s potential to foster novel solutions within the sector.
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
4. Designing and Developing of a Digital Twin Framework for Workforce Training (DT4WFT)
- Cutting Tool: Equipped with a rotating cutting disc capable of tilting up to 45 degrees on the B-axis, enabling angled and precision cuts for intricate designs.
- Cutting Head Module: Provides 360-degree rotation on the C-axis, facilitating multi-directional cuts and improving processing efficiency.
- Z-Axis Module: Ensures vertical motion for precise depth cuts tailored to specific design requirements.
- X-Axis Module: This module supports horizontal motion for longitudinal and transverse cuts, complemented by Y-axis movement to ensure full surface coverage.
- Feed System: Automated systems stabilize and move stone slabs during cutting, reducing errors and ensuring high precision.
- Rigid Body Definition: Models mobile components with high accuracy in the virtual environment.
- Collision Body Definition: Ensures spatial constraints are respected, mitigating proximity risks.
- Virtual Commissioning: This technology supports testing and debugging control code on virtual prototypes, minimizing the risks and costs associated with physical commissioning.
- Real-Time Data Integration: Dynamically adjusts virtual models to reflect changing operating conditions, particularly valuable for machinery like CtSSLs with complex moving components.
4.1. Ensuring Confidentiality and Reliability
4.2. Describing the Digital Twin Framework for Workforce Training Framework (DT4WFT)
5. Implementation of a Digital Twin Framework for Workforce Training (DT4WFT)
5.1. Mechatronic Concept in StoneCUT@Line® Digital Twin Integration
5.2. Electrical Configurations Using Signal Adapter


5.3. Diagnosing Motion Simulation and Control in StoneCUT@Line®

6. Validation and Preliminary Testing of the Digital Twin Framework for Workforce Training (DT4WFT)
6. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- E. den Hartigh, C. C. M. Stolwijk, J. R. Ortt, and L. M. Punter, “Configurations of digital platforms for manufacturing: An analysis of seven cases according to platform functions and types,” Electron. Mark., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 30, Dec. 2023. [CrossRef]
- C. E. Cremonini, J. O. C. Vasco, M. R. C. Gaspar, and A. da Silva, “Digital Twins and the Ornamental Stone Industry: Key Factors,” Comun. Geológicas 111, 91-100 ISSN 0873-948X; e-ISSN 1647-581X, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://dspace.uevora.pt/rdpc/handle/10174/36970?mode=full9.
- S. Mariani, M. Picone, and A. Ricci, “Agents and Digital Twins for the engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems: opportunities, and challenges,” Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 953–974, Aug. 2024. [CrossRef]
- Y. Xu, Y. Sun, X. Liu, and Y. Zheng, “A Digital-Twin-Assisted Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Transfer Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 19990–19999, 2019. [CrossRef]
- A. Silva, A. Dionisio, and I. Almeida, “Enabling Cyber-Physical Systems for Industry 4.0 operations: A Service Science Perspective,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 838–846, Jun. 2020. [CrossRef]
- L. Di Bella, A. Katsinis, J. Lagüera-González, L. Odenthal, M. Hell, and B. Lozar, “Annual Report on European SMEs 2022/2023,” 2023.
- A. S. Kulinan, M. Park, P. P. W. Aung, G. Cha, and S. Park, “Advancing construction site workforce safety monitoring through BIM and computer vision integration,” Autom. Constr., vol. 158, p. 105227, Feb. 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. C. Lyons, K. Vidamour, R. Jain, and M. Sutherland, “Developing an understanding of lean thinking in process industries,” Prod. Plan. Control, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 475–494, 2013. [CrossRef]
- F. Gillani, K. A. Chatha, S. S. Jajja, D. Cao, and X. Ma, “Unpacking Digital Transformation: Identifying key enablers, transition stages and digital archetypes,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 203, p. 123335, Jun. 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. Tao, L. Chunhui, X. Hui, Z. Zhiheng, and W. Guangyue, “A review of digital twin intelligent assembly technology and application for complex mechanical products,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 127, no. 9–10, pp. 4013–4033, Aug. 2023. [CrossRef]
- K. Alexopoulos, N. Nikolakis, and G. Chryssolouris, “Digital twin-driven supervised machine learning for the development of artificial intelligence applications in manufacturing,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 429–439, May 2020. [CrossRef]
- P. Stavropoulos and A. Papacharalampopoulos, “Designing a digital twin for micromanufacturing processes,” Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 14, no. 6, Jun. 2022. [CrossRef]
- G. Schneider, M. Wendl, S. Kucek, and M. Leitner, “A Training Concept Based on a Digital Twin for a Wafer Transportation System,” in 2021 IEEE 23rd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), Sep. 2021, pp. 20–28. [CrossRef]
- T. Kaarlela, S. Pieska, and T. Pitkaaho, “Digital Twin and Virtual Reality for Safety Training,” in 2020 11th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), Sep. 2020, pp. 000115–000120. [CrossRef]
- A. Silva and A. Pata, “Value Creation in Technology Service Ecosystems - An Empirical Case Study,” in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 2023, pp. 26–36.
- K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45–77, Dec. 2007. [CrossRef]
- A. Da Silva and A. Cardoso, “Design Science for Networks Designing: A Service-Dominant Logic Approach,” Eur. Conf. Res. Methodol. Bus. Manag. Stud., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 35–42, Jun. 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. da Silva and A. J. Marques Cardoso, “Designing the future of coopetition: An IIoT approach for empowering SME networks,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 135, no. 1–2, pp. 747–762, Nov. 2024. [CrossRef]
- J. vom Brocke, A. Hevner, and A. Maedche, “Introduction to Design Science Research,” no. September, 2020, pp. 1–13.
- N. V. Ivankova and V. L. Plano Clark, “Teaching mixed methods research: using a socio-ecological framework as a pedagogical approach for addressing the complexity of the field,” Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 409–424, Jul. 2018. [CrossRef]
- A. da Silva and I. Almeida, “Towards INDUSTRY 4.0 | a case STUDY in ornamental stone sector,” Resour. Policy, vol. 67, p. 101672, Aug. 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. Kasmi, S. M. Amir, A. Aman, B. Haruna, and A. F. Usman, “Implementation of Science and Technology for Regional Development: Improving the Quality of Ornamental Fish Production with a Concentration of Clove Oil Alternative to Sustainable Fishing Gear,” Mattawang J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 370–379, Sep. 2022. [CrossRef]
- Chioma Ann Udeh, Omamode Henry Orieno, Obinna Donald Daraojimba, Ndubuisi Leonard Ndubuisi, and Osato Itohan Oriekhoe, “Big Data Analytics: a Review of Its Transformative Role in Modern Business Intelligence,” Comput. Sci. IT Res. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 219–236, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Z. Zhu, Z. Lin, J. Huang, L. Zheng, and B. He, "A digital twin-based machining motion simulation and visualization mvisualizationtem for milling robot," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 127, no. 9–10, pp. 4387–4399, Aug. 2023. [CrossRef]
- L. Hagedorn, T. Riedelsheimer, and R. Stark, “PROJECT-BASED LEARNING IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION – DEVELOPING DIGITAL TWINS IN A CASE STUDY,” Proc. Des. Soc., vol. 3, pp. 2975–2984, Jul. 2023. [CrossRef]
- T. I. Erdei, R. Krakó, and G. Husi, “Design of a Digital Twin Training Centre for an Industrial Robot Arm,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 17, p. 8862, Sep. 2022. [CrossRef]
- A. Legner, T. Pentek, and B. Otto, “Accumulating Design Knowledge with Reference Models: Insights from 12 Years’ Research into Data Management,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 735–770, May 2020. [CrossRef]
- A. da Silva and A. J. M. Cardoso, “Coopetition with the Industrial IoT: A Service-Dominant Logic Approach,” Appl. Syst. Innov., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 47, May 2024. [CrossRef]
- J. Creswell and P. Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2017.
- V. A. Arowoiya, R. C. Moehler, and Y. Fang, “Digital twin technology for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in buildings: A state-of-the-art and future directions,” Energy Built Environ., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 641–656, Oct. 2024. [CrossRef]
- G. Ke et al., “Intelligent machine plus production line digital twin model construction technology,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2478, no. 10, p. 102011, Jun. 2023. [CrossRef]
- J. Itohan Oviawe, “Bridging Skill Gap to Meet Technical, Vocational Education and Training School-Workplace Collaboration in the 21.,” Int. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 7, 2017. [CrossRef]
- A. Berriche, F. Mhenni, A. Mlika, and J.-Y. Choley, “Towards Model Synchronization for Consistency Management of Mechatronic Systems,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 10, p. 3577, May 2020. [CrossRef]
- R. Y. Zhong, X. Xu, E. Klotz, and S. T. Newman, “Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review,” Engineering, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 616–630, 2017. [CrossRef]
- A.-R. Sadeghi, C. Wachsmann, and M. Waidner, “Security and privacy challenges in industrial internet of things,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference, Jun. 2015, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
- R. P. Madruga, É. Renato Silva, J. Francisco Moreira Pessanha, H. Henriques de Arruda, and A. Naked Haddad, “From IFCX to CXMMI: Validation and Evolution of a Customer Experience Management Maturity Model,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, no. July, pp. 119350–119370, 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. Yazdinejad, B. Zolfaghari, A. Dehghantanha, H. Karimipour, G. Srivastava, and R. Parizi, “Accurate threat hunting in industrial internet of things edge devices,” Digital Communications and Networks, vol. 9, no. 5. pp. 1123–1130, 2023. [CrossRef]
- A. Silva and M. Gil, "Industrial processes optimization inoptimizationketplace context: A case study in ornamental stone sector," Results Eng., vol. 7, no. April, p. 100152, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Hoppe, “OPC Unified Architecture-Interoperability for Industrie 4.0 and the Internet of Things,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://opcfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/OPC-UA-Interoperability-For-Industrie4-and-IoT-EN.pdf.
- M. Borchert and C. Bonefeld-Dahl, “A Stronger Digital Europe: Our Call to Action Towards 2025,” DigitalEurope, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.digitaleurope.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DIGITALEUROPE-–-Our-Call-to-Action-for-A-STRONGER-DIGITAL-EUROPE.pdf.
- M. S. Mahmoud, M. Sabih, and M. Elshafei, “Using OPC technology to support the study of advanced process control,” ISA Trans., vol. 55, pp. 155–167, Mar. 2015. [CrossRef]
- J. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2014.











| Software package | Purpose/Function |
| InoAlloc® | Selection of stone slabs from the company’s database |
| InoDigi® | Scanning of stone slabs |
| MinoCam® | Performs CAD/CAM operations |
| InoNest® | 2D nesting of parts |
| InoDriver® | Management of actuators and sensors |
| InoControl® | Performs the CNC code execution |
| Variable | Value | Units | Situation of use |
| Entry Height (EnH) | 10 | mm | Entry on the stone slab’s top surface |
| Entry Length (EnL) | 60 | mm | |
| Exit Height (ExH) | 10 | mm | Exit on the stone slab’s top surface |
| Exit Length (ExL) | 50 | mm | |
| Entry Offset (EnO) | 10 | mm | Overcome cutting length and tool protection |
| Exit Offset (ExO) | 10 | mm | |
| Retract Height (ReH) | 100 | mm | Height for fast motions |

| 1 | |
| 2 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).