Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

The Impact of Tiktok’s Fast-Paced Content on Attention Span of Students

Submitted:

02 January 2025

Posted:

03 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of TikTok's fast-paced content delivery and infinite scrolling on students' attention spans. With the increasing popularity of social media platforms like TikTok, concerns have arisen regarding their effects on cognitive functions, particularly among students. Key findings from existing research indicate that TikTok's rapid pace and constant stimulation can lead to shortened attention spans, reducing students' ability to sustain focus during tasks requiring prolonged concentration. While excessive use of TikTok is linked to academic challenges such as decreased study time and impaired information retention, some studies suggest that TikTok can foster creativity and engagement in educational contexts when appropriately utilized. This paper considers the varying impact of TikTok on different demographic groups, with a particular emphasis on younger users. It discusses the need for further longitudinal and experimental research to explore the long-term effects of TikTok on attention, neuropsychological mechanisms, and potential interventions for mitigating negative outcomes. The scope of this paper includes an analysis of TikTok's influence on attention span, its implications for academic performance, and the broader educational context.

Keywords: 
TikTok
;  
Attention span
;  
students
;  
education
Subject: 
Social Sciences  -   Education

Introduction

Tiktok is as online video sharing social media platform. Ray (2024) defines Tiktok as a social media platform designed for creating, editing, and sharing short videos between 15 seconds and three minutes in length. TikTok provides songs and sounds as well as filters and special effects that users can add to their videos.
Early in 2014, Music.ly debuted in Shanghai as online music inspired video sharing application, offering a platform for short-form videos where creators could craft comedy sketches or lip-sync to popular songs. In 2016, a Chinese tech giant, Bytedance, introduced Douyin, a similar app that gained traction in China and Thailand, amassing 100 million users within its first year. With a goal for global expansion, Bytedance bought Music.ly in 2017 and rebranded it as TikTok, which gained popularity worldwide. The app only had 55 million users in 2018, but that number exponentially increased to one billion in the summer of 2021 (Raphael, 2023). This number is expected to increase with the world’s growing thirst for content consumption and the overall accelerated growth of internet users across the globe.
The videos posted on Tiktok are short ranging from a single minute (60 seconds) to 30 minutes. The Berlin School of Business and Innovation (2023) noted that content creators on the platform are crafting content that condenses complex concepts into easily understandable snippets, making learning more accessible and engaging for the younger demographic. Notably, TikTok’s short-form video format lends itself to entertainment and comedy as the fast-paced videos are engaging, entertaining and stimulating to the younger generation.
Attention span is the length of time an individual can maintain focused attention on a specific stimulus or task before their attention begins to wander or they become distracted (Simon et al., 2023), and has become a critical area of concern in recent years. The rise of TikTok, a platform known for its fast-paced and highly engaging content, has sparked debates about its influence on cognitive functions, particularly among learners. Studies by Alghamdi and Aljabr (2024) and Sha and Dong (2021) indicate that TikTok adversely affects users’ attention spans, with learners being significantly impacted. According to SGAnalytics (2023), students now struggle to focus on school-related activities for more than 10 minutes. Primary school children increasingly find it difficult to remain seated during assemblies, and many students have lost the ability to sit attentively as part of a large audience. Furthermore, teachers report a noticeable increase in disruptive behaviors, such as unnecessary chatter and shouting in classrooms. This trend is attributed to the ever-swiping nature of social media, which is eroding students’ capacity for sustained attention.

Research Problem

The growing dependence on online video platforms, particularly TikTok, has contributed to a noticeable decline in the attention span of students worldwide. Many learners struggle to stay focused during lessons, finding it increasingly difficult to sit still for 40-45 minutes and engage with the material (Kuss and Griffiths, 2017; Firth et al., 2019). This reduction in attention has serious implications for their academic performance, potentially “rewiring” cognitive functions in ways that impair their ability to concentrate and retain information (Giedd, 2020; Du et al., 2024). Although several studies have advised parents and guardians to limit children’s access to video-sharing platforms, the rising number of Gen Z users continues to increase globally, highlighting the need for a more innovative approach to address this issue. While numerous studies have examined the effects of TikTok on attention span, most studies have had contradicting findings (Anderson et al., 2017; Mill, 2016; Alloway et al., 2013; Johnson, 2006; Peterson and Johnston, 2015; Alloway and Alloway, 2012; Supanitayanon et al., 2020; Haliti-Sylaj, T., & Sadiku; Asif and Kazi, 2024; Alghamdi, R., & Aljabr, 2024). It is critical to address this issue to counteract the declining levels of achievement, retention, attendance, engagement, and motivation that are becoming more prevalent in the educational process. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of TikTok’s fast-paced content on the attention span of students, reviewing both TikTok-specific research and broader studies on the effects of social media on attention. The findings will provide valuable insights for educators, parents, and policymakers.

Theoretical Framework

Cognitive Load Theory: Rapid content consumption, such as that facilitated by platforms like TikTok, can increase cognitive load and impact attention by overwhelming the brain’s processing capacity. Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1988) suggests that working memory has a limited capacity to process information at any given time. When users consume fast-paced content, they are required to process a high volume of stimuli—visual, auditory, and informational—within a short time frame, leading to an increased intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load.
Each video presents unique information that demands attention, comprehension, and sometimes emotional engagement. As users rapidly scroll from one video to the next, their brains must constantly reset and adjust to new contexts and stimuli, which may impair sustained attention over time (Klimova & Poulova, 2021). This fragmented processing hinders the brain’s ability to focus on a single task for extended periods, as it becomes accustomed to switching between brief bursts of high-intensity stimuli (Firth et al., 2019).
Moreover, the instant gratification and reward system embedded in these platforms—where users receive likes and comments—may reinforce a preference for short, fast-paced interactions over deep, sustained focus (Montag et al., 2021). Over time, this can condition users to seek out similar rapid content, reducing their ability to engage with longer, more complex tasks, such as reading or problem-solving.
Attention span theories: Attention span, a crucial cognitive function, is explored through various theories, including selective and sustained attention. Selective attention, which involves focusing on relevant information while ignoring distractions, is limited by cognitive resources and can be impaired by frequent exposure to distractions like TikTok’s rapid content (Broadbent, 1958; Cowan, 2001). Sustained attention, or vigilance, allows individuals to maintain focus on tasks over extended periods but declines naturally over time and can be hindered by rapid content consumption, reducing the ability to focus on long-term tasks (Posner & Petersen, 1990; Firth et al., 2019). These two types of attention work together, and over-reliance on fast-paced stimuli may fragment focus and decrease task performance (Carr, 2020). Understanding these theories underscores the need to balance rapid content consumption with practices that foster sustained focus, such as mindfulness and deep reading, to mitigate the negative impact of constant exposure to rapid stimuli.

Social Media and Cognitive Development

There have been conflicting findings regarding the relationship between social media cognitive development; Lara and Bokoch (2021) findings revealed that there is no significant relationship between social media use, working memory functioning, and ability to inhibit information. While, Shanmugasundaram and Tamilarasu (2023) noted that distractions from digital technologies can lead to a decreased levels of indepth thinking, lower GPAs, academic performance. lower comprehension scores etc. the researchers concluded that the online world is changing thought patterns and leading to poor levels of thinking. The web can lead to both high level and sustained alterations in the brain, affects learners’ cognition (Firth, 2019).
In addition, excessive digital media use is associated with poorer cognitive control, including attention and inhibitory control (Ferguson, 2011). Furthermore, digital devices have been linked to disrupted sleep patterns, which can also affect learning. Adolescents who used electronic devices at bedtime had increased sleep problems and daytime sleepiness, which can impair cognitive function and academic performance (Hysing et al., 2015). Research has also shown that greater screen time in children is associated with lower cortical thickness, particularly in areas associated with language and literacy skills (Paulus et al., 2019).

Why is TikTok special?

TikTok’s design focuses on user engagement through short video duration, infinite scrolling, advanced algorithms, and mechanisms promoting instant gratification. Short videos, typically 15 to 60 seconds, reduce cognitive effort and promote repetitive viewing cycles. Infinite scrolling loads content without user input, making it easier to engage and reducing time distortion. TikTok’s recommendation system uses machine learning algorithms to deliver highly personalized content, with features like the For You Page (FYP) and feedback loops. This hyper-personalization fosters compulsive use, as users are constantly exposed to interesting or rewarding content. TikTok also integrates features that provide immediate rewards for creators and viewers, reinforcing platform usage. Creators receive quick feedback through views, likes, and comments, motivating continuous content creation. Viewers experience emotional rewards through humorous, entertaining, or relatable content, contributing to the addictive nature of the platform.
TikTok’s platform features like likes, comments, shares, and personalized recommendations are designed to encourage user engagement. Likes are a way for users to express their approval of a video, boosting self-esteem and encouraging further participation. Comments foster interaction between creators and viewers, enhancing a sense of belonging. Shares extend the visibility of content beyond TikTok, attracting more users and contributing to viral trends. Personalized recommendations are based on advanced machine learning that predicts and delivers videos that align with users’ interests. These recommendations create a feedback loop that increases user retention by satisfying their specific preferences. Thereby, creating a sense of community and engagement among its users.
TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube have different content delivery mechanisms, each with unique impacts on user attention and engagement. TikTok’s short videos with infinite scrolling and algorithm-driven “For You Page” focus on instant gratification, potentially reducing sustained attention and heightening selective attention. Instagram’s mix of static images, short videos, stories, and reels creates a fragmented consumption pattern, potentially overloading cognitive resources. YouTube’s longer-form videos with optional shorts and deliberate content consumption improve sustained attention and selective attention in ads, but may lead to overstimulation and prolonged screen time.
Table 1. Summary of Differences.
Table 1. Summary of Differences.
Platform Content Delivery Impact on Attention
TikTok Short, fast-paced videos with infinite scrolling Reduces sustained attention; improves selective attention.
Instagram Mixed formats (images, stories, reels) Moderately impacts sustained attention; risk of visual overload.
YouTube Long-form videos with manual navigation Encourages sustained attention; selective attention heightened by ads.

Attention Span and Its Importance for Students

Attention span is a crucial cognitive ability that underpins learning, problem-solving, and daily functioning. It consists of several interconnected components, including selective attention, sustained attention (vigilance), divided attention, and alternating attention. These components determine how effectively an individual can focus on tasks, influenced by factors like cognitive load, relevance, and task importance. Internal factors, such as age, fatigue, interest, and motivation, can reduce attention span, with tasks aligning with personal interests being easier to focus on, while noisy or chaotic settings hinder concentration (Parasuraman and Davies, 1984). External factors, particularly digital media platforms like TikTok, may shorten attention spans for slower-paced tasks. Attention span is often assessed through tasks like Continuous Performance Tests (CPT) or Stroop tasks, which evaluate selective, sustained, and divided attention (Rosvold et al., 1956).
Attention span is critical for academic success, information retention, and classroom behavior. It impacts a student’s ability to focus, solve problems, and understand key concepts, which leads to better test scores. Sustained attention facilitates deeper engagement and more effective information consolidation, while divided attention during study sessions can hinder memory retention. It also shapes classroom behaviour, with students who can focus participating actively and maintaining self-regulation, while those with shorter attention spans may exhibit disruptive behaviours, such as restlessness or talking out of turn. Teachers must adapt strategies to accommodate varying attention spans among students.
Digital consumption has significantly impacted attention span, especially in younger generations. The rise of short-form content, such as social media, search engines, and instant messaging, has led to a decrease in sustained attention. Younger generations are particularly susceptible due to neuroplasticity and habit formation, leading to reduced focus and a preference for stimuli-rich environments (Kuss & Griffiths, 2017). While digital platforms can foster hyperfocus in contexts like gaming and interactive media, they also contribute to a tendency to skim and process information quickly. This shift poses challenges in educational settings and mental health, with long-term cognitive effects, such as eroded critical thinking and deep reading skills, becoming a growing concern.

Effects on Academic Performance and Classroom Behaviour

TikTok’s influence on academic performance and classroom behaviour extends beyond entertainment, affecting study habits, concentration, classroom engagement, and long-term outcomes. The rapid pace of TikTok’s content and its reward-driven short-form videos can interfere with students’ focus during study sessions, leading to shortened attention spans, difficulty in task switching, and reduced deep processing. TikTok’s impact on classroom attention and engagement can be positive or negative depending on the content and student interaction. On the positive side, TikTok’s content can stimulate creativity and engagement (TikTok, 2020; Hindi, 2020; Marquette University, 2021; Lee, 2024; CHC, 2020), but it also poses risks of distraction and disengagement (SGAnalytics, 2023; Clarity Clinic, 2024; Capitol Technology University, 2023).
The addictive nature of TikTok can lead to distractions during class, reducing students’ focus on educational content. Classroom behaviour and social dynamics may also be affected by TikTok’s use, as students may become more socially focused on the platform, negatively affecting classroom dynamics and disrupting the learning environment. Long-term effects of TikTok on attention span and academic performance are ongoing research. Long-term exposure to platforms like TikTok may lead to sustained changes in attention span, diminished cognitive control, and lower academic achievement over time. Longitudinal studies have shown that students who engage heavily with social media platforms often experience a decline in academic performance due to reduced time spent on study-related activities and decreased focus during class (Koessmeier & Büttner, 2021). Cognitive function and long-term development may also be affected by TikTok’s impact on social and emotional development. Excessive engagement with the platform can foster social comparisons, anxiety, and ‘Fear of Missing Out’ (FOMO) (Robinson and Smith, 2024; Milyavskaya et al., 2018; Columbia University, 2023; Anto et al., 2023), which can negatively affect students’ self-esteem and academic motivation, ultimately affecting classroom behaviour, participation, and overall academic performance.

Studies on social media and Attention Span

Research on social media’s impact on attention span has shown a complex interplay of benefits and drawbacks (Anderson et al., 2017; Mill, 2016; Alloway et al., 2013; Johnson, 2006; Peterson and Johnston, 2015; Alloway and Alloway, 2012; Supanitayanon et al., 2020; Haliti-Sylaj, T., & Sadiku; Asif and Kazi, 2024; Alghamdi, R., & Aljabr, 2024). Shortened attention span is linked to increased task switching and habitual multitasking, which can reduce cognitive engagement and filter out distractions. Social media consumption influences the brain’s neural pathways through reward systems and neuroadaptation. The effects vary across age groups, with younger generations more susceptible due to their developing brains and higher screen time. Classroom and learning implications include disruptive effects, such as decreased focus and academic performance, and enhanced engagement when integrated effectively into education. However, social media can offer unique cognitive benefits, such as improved visual attention, adaptation to information overload, and collaborative learning (Lerman, 2007; Liu et al., 2022).

Studies on TikTok and Attention Span

TikTok has been linked to various negative effects on students’ attention span, academic performance, and cognitive function (Haliti-Sylaj, T., & Sadiku; Asif and Kazi, 2024; Alghamdi, R., & Aljabr, 2024). Studies have shown that the fast-paced content on TikTok can shorten attention span, cause distraction, and lead to task switching. This pattern, when extended to academic work, results in a diminished ability to focus on tasks that require extended attention.
The impact of TikTok on academic performance has been mixed, with some arguing that it may have educational value, while others point to its potential for negatively affecting students’ academic outcomes (Battisby, 2023; Bassey, 2024). Excessive TikTok usage is correlated with lower academic performance due to time spent on the platform and constant distractions. Additionally, high TikTok usage has been linked to increased procrastination.
TikTok’s fast-paced content may also affect broader cognitive functions, such as memory, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Continuous exposure to quick snippets of information can impair students’ ability to retain and recall information over the long term, with the information overload associated with TikTok potentially overwhelming cognitive load, making it harder to process and store information effectively. Behavioral aspects, such as engagement, motivation, and social interactions, play a central role in how TikTok impacts students’ attention span and learning behaviors. While TikTok increases engagement, it also reduces task completion and motivation to finish academic tasks. Social learning and peer influence on the platform can lead to either positive or negative academic behaviors depending on the content consumed.
Research on TikTok’s impact on attention span presents two contrasting perspectives. Some argue that the platform’s effects are negligible or even beneficial under certain circumstances, suggesting that TikTok caters to younger generations’ changing cognitive styles rather than hindering their focus (Ferrario, 2020). From this viewpoint, any reduction in attention span is seen as a temporary adjustment to new media, rather than a permanent impairment. Conversely, other studies highlight potential benefits of TikTok when integrated into educational settings, such as stimulating creativity, improving focus on visual and auditory content, promoting attention to task-relevant information, and fostering cognitive flexibility and adaptability (Aziz and Dali, 2023; Qiyang and Jung, 2019; Matchin, 2024; SocialDay, 2024).
TikTok’s educational potential offers an opportunity to enhance students’ attention span in learning contexts. Engaging educational content, such as learning challenges and active participation through comment sections, has been found to improve students’ ability to focus on academic material compared to entertainment-focused content. Furthermore, TikTok encourages peer learning and social interaction, which can enhance attention span by offering opportunities for real-time interaction and learning from peers.

Input from Neurologists and Psychologists

Some neurologists have observed that increased reliance on advancing technologies and readily accessible digital storage may be contributing to changes in brain size (Small and Vorgan, 2009). Korte (2020) argue that most studies cannot differentiate between a causal versus correlational relationship. He concluded that it is impossible for online media to change human brains due to processes of neuronal plasticity. Similarly, Hoehe and Thibaut (2020) posits that numerous studies are yet to establish a link between digital media consumption to mental health problems, or the deterioration of well-being.
Furthermore, Vedechkina and Borgonovi (2021) highlighted that the absence of longitudinal studies complicates efforts to determine the causal relationship between digital technology use and cognitive function. While social media are often assumed to contribute to deficits in attention and cognitive control, the reverse could also hold true. For instance, children with greater attention difficulties might gravitate toward social media such as TikTok due to their cognitive-behavioural traits, such as a need for higher levels of stimulation and difficulty engaging with less dynamic environments (Beyens et al., 2018). Similarly, children who struggle to focus on a single task may be more prone to frequent multitasking with digital devices (Ralph et al., 2015). Current evidence suggests a potential bidirectional relationship between technology use and cognitive abilities (Gentile et al., 2012; Baumgartner et al., 2014), indicating that individuals are often drawn to technologies that align with their capabilities and preferences. However, due to the limitations of existing data, causality cannot yet be determined. Further longitudinal and experimental studies that consider individual differences are necessary to clarify the direction of the relationship between digital media use and cognition.
Medical experts suggest that the human brain is adapting to this new form of information exchange, which may not necessarily have negative implications (Firth et al., 2019; Korte, 2020).

Factors Influencing Attention Span in the Context of TikTok

TikTok’s impact on attention span is influenced by a range of factors, including content type, frequency of use, user age, and socio-demographic characteristics. Entertainment-focused content, with its fast-paced nature, is more likely to shorten attention spans (Fossati et al., 2018), while educational content such as academic tutorials can encourage deeper engagement, fostering longer attention spans. User-generated content that promotes interaction can further enhance engagement and improve sustained attention.
The frequency of TikTok use also plays a significant role. High-frequency use contributes to attention fragmentation, making it harder for users to focus on more demanding tasks (Carr, 2020). Moderate use, however, supports attention flexibility, allowing users to maintain focus without significantly impairing cognitive functioning.
Younger users, especially teenagers and young adults, are more susceptible to TikTok’s fast-paced design, which triggers dopamine release and rewards quick consumption, further shortening their attention spans. Older users, on the other hand, may have better attention regulation and are less distracted by the platform’s content. Socio-demographic factors, such as educational background, socio-economic status, and geographical location, also shape how TikTok impacts attention. Higher-educated users tend to filter out distractions more effectively while users from lower educational backgrounds may struggle more with disengaging from attention-grabbing content. Additionally, internet access and digital media engagement in different geographical locations can influence how TikTok affects attention.
TikTok’s design and content structure amplify its effects on attention span. Its fast-paced, short-form content, paired with a reward system and fragmented consumption of information, trains the brain to expect constant novelty, leading to shorter attention spans. Rapid task switching and reduced cognitive control further hinder the brain’s ability to engage in tasks requiring sustained focus and deep processing (Fossati et al., 2018). The algorithm delivers content tailored to individual preferences, reinforcing usage patterns through dopamine-driven feedback loops, which in turn decreases the capacity for sustained attention and promotes instant gratification.
Fragmented consumption of information on TikTok ultimately leads to shallow processing, cognitive overload, and impaired memory consolidation. The constant shifting of stimuli fosters a tendency to seek novelty, diminishing the ability to focus on less stimulating but more meaningful tasks that require prolonged attention.

TikTok as a learning tool?

Educators are increasingly considering TikTok as a potential learning tool (Heriot Watt University, 2023). While TikTok is primarily known for its entertainment value, its engaging short-form videos have sparked interest in educational contexts (Cultivating Exceptional Minds, 2020). Research indicates that TikTok can be an effective educational tool, enhancing student engagement and motivation (Aziz and Dali, 2023). Educators are exploring ways to use TikTok to enhance learning by creating bite-sized, creative, and interactive content that aligns with students’ digital habits. Some teachers use TikTok to share educational tips, promote discussions, and present complex concepts in a more relatable and engaging manner (Kavanagh, 2024). However, challenges related to its distracting nature and the need for appropriate content remain, so careful integration into the curriculum is necessary.

Implications for Education

TikTok and other social media platforms have shaped students’ attention spans, necessitating educators to adapt their teaching strategies to meet these needs. Strategies include breaking lessons into smaller, manageable sections, incorporating multimedia elements, encouraging active participation through quizzes, polls, and discussions, and providing frequent breaks between tasks. Balancing technology use in learning is essential, with blended learning models incorporating both digital content and traditional teaching methods. Limiting distractions and promoting mindful media consumption are also key.
Teachers, school administrators, and policymakers should explore the integration of TikTok into the teaching and learning process. It is essential to leverage this platform to engage and interact with learners, fostering educational opportunities in a way that aligns with their current usage habits.
Parents and policymakers play a crucial role in guiding students’ use of social media platforms. Parents can monitor and limit students’ screen time, setting boundaries on when and how TikTok is used. Policymakers can introduce guidelines that regulate screen time for students, particularly for platforms like TikTok, which may lead to excessive engagement. Schools can collaborate with parents to establish a “screen time policy” that promotes healthy media use while still incorporating digital learning tools.
Promoting digital literacy and critical thinking is essential for empowering students. Building digital literacy skills and advocating for policy change can help students process information effectively, even when consuming rapid, fragmented content on platforms like TikTok.

Conclusion

The paper examines the impact of TikTok’s rapid content delivery and infinite scrolling on students’ attention spans, suggesting that the platform’s design promotes short bursts of attention but may condition users to expect constant stimulation. The fast pace and rewarding nature of TikTok can lead to a reduction in attention span, especially for tasks requiring sustained focus. Prolonged use of TikTok may hinder academic performance by decreasing study time, impairing information retention, and distracting students in the classroom. However, some studies propose that TikTok can enhance creativity and engagement when utilized appropriately in educational contexts. The effect of TikTok on attention span appears to be influenced by user demographics, with younger generations being more vulnerable. Future research should address the need for longitudinal and experimental studies to better understand causality, including the long-term effects of TikTok on attention, the specific content types involved, the underlying neuropsychological mechanisms, and the effectiveness of potential interventions. Balancing the use of technology in educational settings is essential to foster positive cognitive development while minimizing negative impacts.

Author Contributions

All authors were involved in concept, design, collection of data, interpretation, writing, and critically revising the article. All authors approved the final version of the article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Alghamdi, R., & Aljabr, N. (2024). The impact of tiktok on employees’ attention span. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 9(11), 31.
  2. Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2012). The impact of engagement with social networking sites (SNSs) on cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1748-1754. [CrossRef]
  3. Alloway, T. P., Horton, J., Alloway, R. G., & Dawson, C. (2013). Social networking sites and cognitive abilities: Do they make you smarter?. Computers & Education, 63, 10-16. [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, D. R., Subrahmanyam, K., & Cognitive Impacts of Digital Media Workgroup. (2017). Digital screen media and cognitive development. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement_2), S57-S61.
  5. Anto, A., Asif, R. O., Basu, A., Kanapathipillai, D., Salam, H., Selim, R., ... & Eisingerich, A. B. (2023). Exploring the impact of social media on anxiety among university students in the United Kingdom: qualitative study. JMIR formative research, 7(1), e43037. [CrossRef]
  6. Asif, M., & Kazi, S. Examining the Influence of Short Videos on Attention Span and its Relationship with Academic Performance. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(4), 1877-1883.
  7. Aziz, H. A. A., & Dali, S. Z. M. More than just engaging? TikTok as an effective educational tool. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling (IJEPC), 8(52). 133-142. [CrossRef]
  8. Battisby, A. (2023). An In-Depth Look at Marketing on TikTok. Digital Marketing Institute. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://digitalmarketinginstitute.com/blog/an-in-depth-look-at-marketing-on-tiktok.
  9. Baumgartner, S. E., Weeda, W. D., Van der Heijden, L. L., and Huizinga, M. (2014). The relationship between media multitasking and executive function in early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescent. 34, 1120–1144. [CrossRef]
  10. Berlin school of business and innovation (2023). How TikTok has become a source of information for young people. BSBI. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.berlinsbi.com/blog/how-tiktok-has-become-a-source-of-information-for-young-people.
  11. Beyens, I., Valkenburg, P. M., and Piotrowski, J. T. (2018). Screen media use and ADHD-related behaviors: four decades of research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 9875–9881. [CrossRef]
  12. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Pergamon Press. [CrossRef]
  13. Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. WW Norton & Company.
  14. CHC (2020). How to Use TikTok to Engage Students in Learning. CHC Resource Library. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.chconline.org/resourcelibrary/how-to-use-tiktok-to-engage-students-in-learning/.
  15. Clarity Clinic (2024). Unveiling the TikTok Effect: How It’s Impacting Youth Mental Health. Claritychi.com. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.claritychi.com/blog/how-tiktok-is-impacting-youth-mental-health.
  16. Columbia University (2023). Smartphones, Social Media, and Their Impact on Mental Health. Columbia University Department of Psychiatry. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from.
  17. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioural and brain sciences, 24(1), 87-114. [CrossRef]
  18. Cultivating Exceptional Minds (2020). Using Tik Tok to Engage Students. Cultivating Exceptional Minds. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.cultivatingexceptionalminds.com/using-tik-tok-as-teachers.
  19. Du, N., Liu, L., Zhang, L., & Yin, S. (2024). The impact of internet use on adolescents’ health: empirical evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1404574. [CrossRef]
  20. Ferguson, C. J. (2011). The influence of television and video game use on attention and school problems: A multivariate analysis with other risk factors controlled. Journal of psychiatric research, 45(6), 808-813. [CrossRef]
  21. Ferrario, M. (2020). TikTok can be useful for training. www.dyndevice.com. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.dyndevice.com/en/news/tiktok-can-be-useful-for-training-ELN-1847/.
  22. Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., & Sarris, J. (2019). The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119-129.
  23. Gentile, D. A., Swing, E. L., Lim, C. G., and Khoo, A. (2012). Video game playing, attention problems, and impulsiveness: evidence of bidirectional causality. Psychol. Pop. Media Cult. 1, 62–70. [CrossRef]
  24. Giedd, J. N. (2020). Adolescent brain and the natural allure of digital media. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 22(2), 127-133. [CrossRef]
  25. Haliti-Sylaj, T., & Sadiku, A. (2024). Impact of Short Reels on Attention Span and Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 60-68.
  26. Heriot Watt University (2023). TikTok as a Teaching Tool - Learning and Teaching Academy. Learning and Teaching Academy. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://lta.hw.ac.uk/tiktok-as-a-teaching-tool/.
  27. Hoehe, M. R., & Thibaut, F. (2020). Going digital: how technology use may influence human brains and behavior. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 22(2), 93-97. [CrossRef]
  28. https://www.columbiapsychiatry.org/research/research-areas/child-and adolescent-psychiatry/sultan-lab-mental-health-informatics/research-areas/smartphones-social-media-and-their-impact-mental-health.
  29. Hysing, M., Pallesen, S., Stormark, K. M., Jakobsen, R., Lundervold, A. J., & Sivertsen, B. (2015). Sleep and use of electronic devices in adolescence: results from a large population-based study. BMJ open, 5(1), e006748. [CrossRef]
  30. Johnson, G. (2006). Internet use and cognitive development: A theoretical framework. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(4), 565-573. [CrossRef]
  31. Kavanagh, A. (2024). RTE icon grandad is my inspiration – I’m following in his footsteps doing his first job & helping tho... The Irish Sun. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.thesun.ie/fabulous/13512443/rte-icon-grandad-inspiration-following-footsteps-first-job.
  32. Klimova, B., Prazak, P., Poulova, P., & Simonova, I. (2021). Determinants affecting the use of the internet by older people. Emerging Science Journal, 5(6), 884-893. [CrossRef]
  33. Koessmeier, C., & Büttner, O. B. (2021). Why are we distracted by social media? Distraction situations and strategies, reasons for distraction, and individual differences. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 711416. [CrossRef]
  34. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(3), 311.
  35. Lara, R. S., & Bokoch, R. (2021). Cognitive functioning and social media: Has technology changed us?. Acta psychologica, 221, 103429. [CrossRef]
  36. Lerman, K. (2007). Social browsing & information filtering in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:0710.5697. arXiv:0710.5697.
  37. Liu, S., Zaigham, G. H. K., Rashid, R. M., & Bilal, A. (2022). Social media-based collaborative learning effects on student performance/learner performance with moderating role of academic self-efficacy. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 903919.
  38. Matchin (2024). Matchin’ – The TikTok effect: TikTok’s algorithm and its impact on trends. Matchin.be. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.matchin.be/en/feed/het-tiktok-effect-het-algoritme-van-tiktok-en-de-impact-op-trends.
  39. Mills, K. L. (2016). Possible effects of internet use on cognitive development in adolescence. Media and Communication, 4(3), 4-12. [CrossRef]
  40. Milyavskaya, M., Saffran, M., Hope, N., & Koestner, R. (2018). Fear of missing out: prevalence, dynamics, and consequences of experiencing FOMO. Motivation and emotion, 42(5), 725-737. [CrossRef]
  41. Montag, C., Yang, H., & Elhai, J. D. (2021). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse from empirical findings. Frontiers in public health, 9, 641673. [CrossRef]
  42. Parasuraman, R., & Davies, D. R. (1984). Varieties of attention. Academic Press.
  43. Paulus, M. P., Zhao, Y., Potenza, M. N., Aupperle, R. L., Bagot, K. S., & Tapert, S. F. (2023). Screen media activity in youth: A critical review of mental health and neuroscience findings. Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 3, 100018. [CrossRef]
  44. Petersen, C., & Johnston, K. A. (2015). The Impact of Social Media Usage on the Cognitive Social Capital of University Students. Informing Science, 18.
  45. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual review of neuroscience, 13(1), 25-42.
  46. Qiyang, Z., & Jung, H. (2019, September). Learning and sharing creative skills with short videos: A case study of user behavior in tiktok and bilibili. In Int. Assoc. Soc. Des. Res. Conf (Vol. 10, pp. 25-50).
  47. Ralph, B. C. W., Thomson, D. R., Seli, P., Carriere, J. S. A., and Smilek, D. (2015). Media multitasking and behavioral measures of sustained attention. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 77, 390–401. [CrossRef]
  48. Raphael, R. (2023). The Rise and Rise of TikTok. Greenbook.org. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://greenbook.org/insights/executive-insights/the-rise-and-rise-of-tiktok.
  49. Ray, M. (2024). TikTok | App History, Videos, China, & Controversies | Britannica. www.britannica.com. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/TikTok.
  50. Robinson, L. and Smith, M. (2024). Social Media and Mental Health: Social Media Addiction. HelpGuide.org. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.helpguide.org/mental-health/wellbeing/social-media-and-mental-health.
  51. Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., Sarason, I., Bransome Jr, E. D., & Beck, L. H. (1956). A continuous performance test of brain damage. Journal of consulting psychology, 20(5), 343.
  52. Schwartz, Q. (2024). The History of TikTok and Where It’s Going. GRIN - Influencer Marketing Software. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://grin.co/blog/the-history-of-tiktok/.
  53. SG Analytics (2023). TikTok Scrolling Has Shortened the Attention Span of Students: How Can EdTech Help Solve the Crisis? www.sganalytics.com. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.sganalytics.com/blog/tiktok-scrolling-has-shortened-the-attention-span-of-students-how-can-edtech-help-solve-the-crisis/.
  54. Shanmugasundaram, M., & Tamilarasu, A. (2023). The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review. Frontiers in Cognition, 2, 1203077. [CrossRef]
  55. Simon, A. J., Gallen, C. L., Ziegler, D. A., Mishra, J., Marco, E. J., Anguera, J. A., & Gazzaley, A. (2023). Quantifying attention span across the lifespan. Frontiers in Cognition, 2, 1207428. [CrossRef]
  56. Small, G., & Vorgan, G. (2009). iBrain: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind. Education Review.
  57. SocialDay (2024). How Tiktok is evolving and What It Means for Your Brand. Social Day. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://www.socialday.live/features/how-tiktok-is-evolving-and-what-it-means-for-your-brand.
  58. Supanitayanon, S., Trairatvorakul, P., & Chonchaiya, W. (2020). Screen media exposure in the first 2 years of life and preschool cognitive development: a longitudinal study. Pediatric Research, 88(6), 894-902. [CrossRef]
  59. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
  60. TikTok (2024). Supporting creative expression in 2020 and beyond. Tiktok.com. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-ie/supporting-expression-2020-and-beyond.
  61. Vedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2021). A review of evidence on the role of digital technology in shaping attention and cognitive control in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 611155. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated