Submitted:
27 December 2024
Posted:
30 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Study Population
2.3. Inclusion Criteria
2.4. Sample Size and Participants
2.5. Ethical Procedures
2.6. Instruments
2.7. Data Collection Procedure
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Categories of Contracting Entities
2.8. Theoretical Framework
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ayuso Murillo, D. Implantación de La Enfermería Escolar En España, Una Prioridad Para El Consejo General de Enfermería. ESE Enfermeria en Salud Escolar 2021, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Gómez, M.; Rodríguez, A.; Fernández, S. El Papel de La Enfermería En La Promoción de La Salud Escolar: Evidencias Desde La Práctica. Enfermería Educativa 2020, 12(3), 45–58. [Google Scholar]
- Pawils, S.; Heumann, S.; Schneider, S. A.; Metzner, F.; Mays, D. The Current State of International Research on the Effectiveness of School Nurses in Promoting the Health of Children and Adolescents: An Overview of Reviews; 2023; Vol. 18. [CrossRef]
- Daily, S. M.; Smith, M. L.; Lilly, C. L.; Davidov, D. M.; Mann, M. J.; Kristjansson, A. L. Using School Climate to Improve Attendance and Grades: Understanding the Importance of School Satisfaction Among Middle and High School Students. Journal of School Health 2020, 90(9), 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Armas Junco, L.; Alonso Martínez, L.; Fernández Hawrylak, M. School Nursing Practice in Education Settings in Spain. The Journal of School Nursing 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorber, M.; Skela Savič, B. Job Satisfaction of Nurses and Identifying Factors of Job Satisfaction in Slovenian Hospitals. Croat Med J 2012, 53(3), 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khai-Lee, O.; Woan-Ching, C.; Bit-Lian, Y. PERCEPTION OF JOB SATISFACTION AMONG OPERATION ROOM NURSES IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL, SAUDI ARABIA. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing 2020, 12(1), 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atefi, N.; Abdullah, K. L.; Wong, L. P.; Mazlom, R. Factors Influencing Registered Nurses Perception of Their Overall Job Satisfaction: A Qualitative Study. Int Nurs Rev 2014, 61(3), 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foley, M.; Lee, J.; Wilson, L.; Young Cureton, V.; Canham, D. A Multi-Factor Analysis of Job Satisfaction among School Nurses. J Sch Nurs 2004, 20(2), 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín, J.; Cortés, J. A.; Morente, M.; Caboblanco, M.; Garijo, J.; Rodríguez, A. Características Métricas Del Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida Profesional. Gac Sanit 2004, 18(6), 489–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cueva-Pila, G.; Valenzuela Suazo, S.; Alvarado Alvarado, A. L.; Hidalgo Ortiz, J. P. Revisión Integrativa de La Calidad de Vida En El Trabajo de Enfermeras Latinoamericanas. Enfermería: Cuidados Humanizados 2022, 11(2), e2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, I. D.; Lesesne, C. A.; Sun, J.; Johns, M. M.; Zhang, X.; Hertz, M. The Relationship of School Connectedness to Adolescents’ Engagement in Co-Occurring Health Risks: A Meta-Analytic Review. J Sch Nurs 2024, 40(1), 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mohammed Yasin, H. Estudio Exploratorio de La Percepción de Padres, Directores de Escuelas y Maestros Acerca de La Enfermera Escolar. TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) 2017.
- Bergren, M. School Nursing and Population Health: Past, Present, and Future. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 2017, 22(3). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasin, Y. M.; Kerr, M. S.; Wong, C. A.; Bélanger, C. H. Factors Affecting Nurses’ Job Satisfaction in Rural and Urban Acute Care Settings: A PRISMA Systematic Review. J Adv Nurs 2020, 76(4), 963–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Montoya-Cáceres, P.; Bello-Escamilla, N.; Neira, J. Relación Entre Calidad de Vida Laboral y Satisfacción Laboral En El Equipo de Atención Primaria de Salud Relationship. Med Segur Trab (Madr) 2020, 66(261), 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Núñez González, E.; Estévez Guerra, G. J.; Hernández Marrero, P.; Marrero Medina, C. D. Una Propuesta Destinada a Complementar El Cuestionario Font-Roja de Satisfacción Laboral. Gac Sanit 2007, 21(2), 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Martín, M.; García-Peña, I. M.; Morales-Asencio, J. M. Calidad de Vida Laboral En Enfermería: Revisión Integrativa de La Literatura. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2020, 94. [Google Scholar]
- Díaz-Rodríguez, L.; Á., D.-H. M.; Ruiz-Fernández, M. D.; Haidar, A. L. (2020). Calidad de Vida Relacionada Con La Salud Percibida Por Los/Las Profesionales de Enfermería de Unidades de Hospitalización. Enferm Clin 2020, 30 (3), 177–182.
- Kocoglu, D.; Emiroglu, O. N. The Impact of Comprehensive School Nursing Services on Students’ Academic Performance. J Caring Sci 2017, 6(1), 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoekstra, B. A.; Young, V. L.; Eley, C. V.; Hawking, M. K. D.; McNulty, C. A. M. School Nurses’ Perspectives on the Role of the School Nurse in Health Education and Health Promotion in England: A Qualitative Study. BMC Nurs 2016, 15(1), 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabezas Peña, C. La Calidad de Vida de Los Profesionales. FMC 2000, 7(Suppl), 53–68.
- Lee, K.; Brown, C.; Singerhouse, E.; Martin, L.; McMorris, B. J. School Nurses and Chronic Absenteeism in Schools: A Qualitative Study on Experiences, Perspectives, and Roles. The Journal of School Nursing 2023. [CrossRef]
- Maughan, E. D.; Cowell, J.; Engelke, M. K.; McCarthy, A. M.; Bergren, M. D.; Murphy, M. K.; Barry, C.; Krause-Parello, C. A.; Luthy, K. B.; Kintner, E. K.; Vessey, J. A. The Vital Role of School Nurses in Ensuring the Health of Our Nation’s Youth. Nurs Outlook 2018, 66(1), 94–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- General de Enfermería, C. Marco de Competencias Del Profesional de Enfermería Experto En El Ámbito Escolar, CONSEJO GE.; Madrid, 2018.
- Aranaz Andrés, J. Cuestionario Font Roja. Un Instrumento de Medida de La Satisfacción En El Medio Hospitalario. Todo Hospital 1988, 52, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
- Portero de la Cruz, S.; Cebrino, J.; Herruzo, J.; Vaquero-Abellán, M. A Multicenter Study into Burnout, Perceived Stress, Job Satisfaction, Coping Strategies, and General Health among Emergency Department Nursing Staff. J Clin Med 2020, 9(4), 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caricati, L.; Sala, R. La; Marletta, G.; Pelosi, G.; Ampollini, M.; Fabbri, A.; Ricchi, A.; Scardino, M.; Artioli, G.; Mancini, T. Work Climate, Work Values and Professional Commitment as Predictors of Job Satisfaction in Nurses. J Nurs Manag 2014, 22(8), 984–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boamah, S. A.; Kalu, M. E.; Havaei, F.; McMillan, K.; Belita, E. Predictors of Nursing Faculty Job and Career Satisfaction, Turnover Intentions, and Professional Outlook: A National Survey. Healthcare 2023, 11(14), 2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, E.; Kim, H.; Lee, T. How Are New Nurses Satisfied with Their Jobs? From the Work Value Perspective of Generations Y and Z Nurses. BMC Nurs 2024, 23(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kagan, I.; Hendel, T.; Savitsky, B. Personal Initiative and Work Environment as Predictors of Job Satisfaction among Nurses: Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Nurs 2021, 20(1), 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dall’Ora, C.; Ball, J.; Reinius, M.; Griffiths, P. Burnout in Nursing: A Theoretical Review. Hum Resour Health 2020, 18(1), 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudays, A.; Gary, F.; Voss, J. G.; Zhang, A. Y.; Alghamdi, A. Utilizing the Social Determinants of Health Model to Explore Factors Affecting Nurses’ Job Satisfaction in Saudi Arabian Hospitals: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2023, 11(17), 2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Sabhan, T. F.; Ahmad, N.; Rasdi, I.; Mahmud, A. JOB SATISFACTION AMONG FOREIGN NURSES IN SAUDI ARABIA: THE CONTRIBUTION OF INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION FACTORS. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 2022, 22(1), 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgos, L.; Martínez, L.; Sánchez, P. Impacto de La Enfermería Escolar En La Salud y El Rendimiento Académico de Los Estudiantes. Revista de Salud Escolar 2019, 7(2), 112–125. [Google Scholar]

| Characteristic |
Global (n=553) |
Health (n=67) |
Education (n=350) |
Others* (n=136) |
p-value |
| Gender (n=553) | 0.474 | ||||
| Male | 13 (2.4%) | 3 (4.5%) | 9 (2.6%) | 1 (0.7%) | |
| Female | 539 (97.5%) | 64 (95.5%) | 340 (97.1%) | 135 (99.3%) | |
| Non-binary | 1 (0.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Age (n=553) | 40.0 [33.0; 46.0] | 40.0 [34.0; 45.0] | 41.0 [33.3; 45.2] | 40.0 [33.0; 46.0] | 0.824 |
| Experience (years) (n=553) | 4.0 [2.0; 7.0] | 4.0 [2.0; 7.5] | 4.0 [2.0; 6.0] | 4.0 [3.0; 8.0] | 0.402 |
| Experience (years, categorized) (n=553) | 0.087 | ||||
| <5 years | 508 (91.9%) | 63 (94.0%) | 322 (92.0%) | 123 (90.4%) | |
| 5 to 10 years | 30 (5.4%) | 1 (1.5%) | 20 (5.7%) | 9 (6.6%) | |
| 10 to 15 years | 7 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (1.1%) | 3 (2.2%) | |
| 15 to 20 years | 6 (1.1%) | 3 (4.5%) | 3 (0.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| > 20 years | 2 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.7%) | |
| Employed Status (n 553) | <0.001 | ||||
| Discontinuous** | 266 (48.1%) | 17 (25.4%) | 204 (58.3%) | 45 (33.1%) | |
| Permanent | 125 (22.6%) | 17 (25.4%) | 28 (8.0%) | 80 (58.8%) | |
| Temporary | 130 (23.5%) | 33 (49.3%) | 97 (27.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Non-permanent/Occasional | 32 (5.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 21 (6.0%) | 11 (8.1%) | |
| Hiring authority (n 553) | <0.001 | ||||
| City Council | 7 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (5.1%) | |
| Education Department | 145 (26.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 145 (41.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Health Department | 60 (10.8%) | 60 (89.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Education | 205 (37.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 205 (58.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| School Nursing Company | 31 (5.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 31 (22.8%) | |
| others | 35 (6.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 35 (25.7%) | |
| Own educational center | 63 (11.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 63 (46.3%) | |
| Health | 7 (1.3%) | 7 (10.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Relationship with other institutions (n=124) | 0.023 | ||||
| Primary Care | 73 (58.9%) | 11 (78.6%) | 47 (58.0%) | 15 (51.7%) | |
| City Council | 11 (8.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 11 (13.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Others | 38 (30.6%) | 2 (14.3%) | 22 (27.2%) | 14 (48.3%) | |
| Social Services | 2 (1.6%) | 1 (7.1%) | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Weekly hours (n=227) | 37.5 [35.0; 37.5] | 37.5 [30.0; 37.5] | 37.5 [35.0; 37.5] | 37.0 [33.8; 38.5] | 0.362 |
| Global (n=553) |
Health (n=67) |
Education (n=350) |
Others* (n=136) |
p-value | |
| Number of Students in the Center (n=552) | 0.037 | ||||
| ≤ 500 | 144 (26.1%) | 19 (28.8%) | 91 (26.0%) | 34 (25.0%) | |
| 501 to 1500 | 330 (59.8%) | 38 (57.6%) | 220 (62.9%) | 72 (52.9%) | |
| > 1500 | 78 (14.1%) | 9 (13.6%) | 39 (11.1%) | 30 (22.1%) | |
| Type of Center | <0.001 | ||||
| High School | 6 (1.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (1.4%) | 1 (0.7%) | |
| Special Education Center | 45 (8.1%) | 14 (20.9%) | 25 (7.1%) | 6 (4.4%) | |
| Early Childhood and Primary | 205 (37.1%) | 20 (29.9%) | 149 (42.6%) | 36 (26.5%) | |
| Early Childhood, Primary, and Secondary | 209 (37.8%) | 20 (29.9%) | 113 (32.3%) | 76 (55.9%) | |
| Primary Education | 32 (5.8%) | 6 (9.0%) | 19 (5.4%) | 7 (5.1%) | |
| Nursery School | 4 (0.7%) | 1 (1.5%) | 3 (0.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Regular School with Special Education | 4 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (1.5%) | |
| Secondary Education Institute | 48 (8.7% | 6 (9.0%) | 34 (9.7%) | 8 (5.9%) | |
| Ownership of the Center | 0.003 | ||||
| State-subsidized Private School | 80 (14.5%) | 8 (11.9%) | 42 (12.0%) | 30 (22.1%) | |
| Private School | 69 (12.5%) | 5 (7.5%) | 40 (11.4%) | 24 (17.6%) | |
| Public School | 404 (73.1%) | 54 (80.6%) | 268 (76.6%) | 82 (60.3%) | |
| Center Characteristics | 0.131 | ||||
| Rural | 57 (10.3%) | 9 (13.4%) | 40 (11.4%) | 8 (5.9%) | |
| Urban | 496 (89.7%) | 58 (86.6%) | 310 (88.6%) | 128 (94.1%) |
| Variables | Global |
Health (n=67) |
Education (n=350) |
Others* (n=136) |
p-value |
| Factor 1: Job Satisfaction | 3.85 (0.83) | 3.74 (0.87) | 3.85 (0.84) | 3.93 (0.80) | 0.302 |
| Factor 2: Work-Related Tension | 2.45 (0.51) | 2.47 (0.51) | 2.45 (0.51) | 2.44 (0.50) | 0.925 |
| Factor 3: Professional Competence | 1.55 (0.73) | 1.58 (0.65) | 1.57 (0.76) | 1.49 (0.69) | 0.511 |
| Factor 4: Work Pressure | 2.97 (0.76) | 3.13 (0.76) | 2.96 (0.76) | 2.95 (0.76) | 0.200 |
| Factor 5: Improvement Opportunities | 3.11 (1.05) | 3.30 (1.07) | 3.04 (1.03) | 3.19 (1.07) | 0.096 |
| Factor 6: Interpersonal Relationship with Superiors | 3.20 (1.13) | 3.28 (1.13) | 3.21 (1.11) | 3.15 (1.19) | 0.748 |
| Factor 7: Interpersonal Relationship with Colleagues | 2.49 (1.12) | 2.45 (1.06) | 2.49 (1.13) | 2.52 (1.14) | 0.911 |
| Factor 8: Extrinsic Status Characteristics | 2.78 (0.89) | 3.03 (0.84) | 2.72 (0.93) | 2.82 (0.81) | 0.025 |
| Factor 9: Job Monotony | 2.74 (0.83) | 2.59 (0.76) | 2.81 (0.82) | 2.64 (0.87) | 0.038 |
| Total Font-Roja Score | 2.86 (0.31) | 2.91 (0.28) | 2.85 (0.32) | 2.87 (0.31) | 0.39 |
| Variables | Global |
Health (n=67) |
Education (n=350) |
Others* (n=136) |
p-value |
| Amount of work I have | 7.50 (1.67) | 7.16 (1.76) | 7.45 (1.63) | 7.79 (1.67) | 0.026 |
| Satisfaction with the type of work | 7.87 (1.78) | 7.82 (1.56) | 7.89 (1.79) | 7.86 (1.86) | 0.960 |
| Satisfaction with salary | 5.94 (2.12) | 6.55 (2.01) | 5.93 (2.08) | 5.67 (2.21) | 0.020 |
| Opportunity for promotion | 2.83 (2.42) | 3.33 (2.81) | 2.69 (2.34) | 2.95 (2.43) | 0.117 |
| Recognition of my effort | 5.68 (2.51) | 5.67 (2.55) | 5.57 (2.52) | 5.96 (2.47) | 0.304 |
| Pressure to maintain quantity of work | 4.92 (2.53) | 5.64 (2.32) | 4.81 (2.52) | 4.86 (2.62) | 0.044 |
| Pressure to maintain quality of work | 5.09 (2.55) | 5.63 (2.37) | 4.89 (2.53) | 5.35 (2.63) | 0.037 |
| Hurry and stress due to lack of time for my work | 5.55 (2.59) | 5.64 (2.54) | 5.32 (2.55) | 6.10 (2.67) | 0.011 |
| Motivation (willingness to exert effort) | 7.75 (2.05) | 7.78 (1.98) | 7.71 (2.04) | 7.85 (2.11) | 0.807 |
| Support from my supervisors | 6.61 (2.58) | 6.12 (2.66) | 6.53 (2.62) | 7.06 (2.37) | 0.032 |
| Due to support from my colleagues, I feel I am at the limit in several aspects | 4.59 (2.62) | 4.63 (2.68) | 4.48 (2.60) | 4.85 (2.65) | 0.378 |
| Support from my family | 8.54 (2.15) | 8.57 (2.08) | 8.60 (2.10) | 8.38 (2.30) | 0.574 |
| Desire to be creative | 8.07 (2.09) | 8.27 (1.86) | 8.05 (2.11) | 8.01 (2.14) | 0.695 |
| Opportunity to be creative | 6.21 (2.54) | 6.36 (2.46) | 6.16 (2.56) | 6.26 (2.56) | 0.809 |
| Disconnecting after work | 6.29 (2.72) | 6.16 (2.77) | 6.37 (2.70) | 6.15 (2.77) | 0.675 |
| Receiving information about the results of my work | 4.65 (2.81) | 4.93 (2.85) | 4.39 (2.74) | 5.19 (2.90) | 0.012 |
| Conflicts with other people at work | 3.03 (2.39) | 3.10 (2.52) | 2.98 (2.35) | 3.12 (2.43) | 0.825 |
| Lack of time for my personal life | 3.56 (2.41) | 4.16 (2.54) | 3.37 (2.34) | 3.78 (2.48) | 0.022 |
| Physical discomfort at work | 3.62 (2.59) | 3.75 (2.66) | 3.54 (2.50) | 3.76 (2.79) | 0.639 |
| Opportunity to express what I think and need | 6.35 (2.49) | 6.16 (2.54) | 6.39 (2.55) | 6.32 (2.31) | 0.785 |
| Responsibility load | 8.41 (1.82) | 8.09 (2.27) | 8.54 (1.64) | 8.24 (2.00) | 0.085 |
| My organization tries to improve the quality of life in my position | 4.51 (2.74) | 4.37 (2.42) | 4.40 (2.78) | 4.88 (2.79) | 0.196 |
| I have autonomy or freedom of decision | 6.86 (2.31) | 6.84 (2.46) | 6.81 (2.31) | 7.01 (2.23) | 0.680 |
| Annoying interruptions | 5.55 (2.71) | 5.13 (2.72) | 5.67 (2.66) | 5.44 (2.84) | 0.284 |
| Stress (emotional effort) | 6.08 (2.55) | 6.06 (2.55) | 5.93 (2.57) | 6.46 (2.46) | 0.121 |
| Necessary training to do my job | 7.89 (1.90) | 7.36 (2.09) | 7.91 (1.84) | 8.10 (1.94) | 0.032 |
| I am capable of doing my current job | 8.71 (1.40) | 8.34 (1.57) | 8.73 (1.39) | 8.85 (1.32) | 0.051 |
| Variety in my work | 6.68 (2.34) | 6.22 (2.55) | 6.64 (2.28) | 6.99 (2.34) | 0.078 |
| My work is important to the lives of others | 8.98 (1.60) | 8.67 (2.27) | 9.15 (1.28) | 8.68 (1.86) | 0.003 |
| It is possible that my responses are heard and applied | 6.35 (2.50) | 6.04 (2.57) | 6.40 (2.49) | 6.39 (2.52) | 0.559 |
| What I have to do is clear | 6.75 (2.49) | 6.99 (2.32) | 6.71 (2.46) | 6.75 (2.65) | 0.712 |
| I am proud of my work | 8.67 (1.58) | 8.39 (1.49) | 8.70 (1.57) | 8.74 (1.62) | 0.283 |
| My work has negative consequences for my health | 3.72 (2.55) | 3.93 (2.48) | 3.64 (2.57) | 3.82 (2.54) | 0.616 |
| Total Font-Roja Score | Total CVP-35 Score | Total CVP-35 Score | |||||
| Reduced Model | |||||||
| Marginal Effect (IC95%) | p-value | Marginal Effect (IC95%) | p-value | Marginal Effect (IC95%) | p-value | ||
| Independent Term | 3.129 (2.819, 3.440) | <0.001 | 6.000 (5.236, 6.763) | <0.001 | 5.781 (5.201, 6.362) | <0.001 | |
| Gender | Male | -ref.- | -ref.- | -ref.- | |||
| Female | -0.104 (-0.281, 0.072) | 0.247 | 0.138 (-0.296, 0.573) | 0.532 | 0.166 (-0.263, 0.596) | 0.447 | |
| Non-binary | 0.150 (-0.501, 0.802) | 0.651 | -1.616 (-3.218, -0.013) | 0.048 | -1.601 (-3.192, -0.010) | 0.049 | |
| Age | <=30 years | -ref.- | -ref.- | -ref.- | |||
| (30, 40] years | -0.084 (-0.166, -0.002) | 0.045 | 0.013 (-0.189, 0.215) | 0.900 | 0.010 (-0.191, 0.211) | 0.921 | |
| (40, 50] years | -0.042 (-0.125, 0.040) | 0.314 | 0.103 (-0.100, 0.306) | 0.318 | 0.086 (-0.115, 0.287) | 0.403 | |
| >50 years | -0.070 (-0.179, 0.039) | 0.207 | -0.260 (-0.529, 0.008) | 0.057 | -0.217 (-0.479, 0.045) | 0.104 | |
| Experience | <5 years | -ref.- | -ref.- | ||||
| 5 to 10 years | 0.057 (-0.064, 0.178) | 0.356 | -0.090 (-0.387, 0.208) | 0.554 | |||
| 10 to 15 years | -0.076 (-0.318, 0.165) | 0.535 | 0.104 (-0.490, 0.698) | 0.731 | |||
| 15 to 20 years | 0.093 (-0.175, 0.360) | 0.497 | -0.249 (-0.907, 0.409) | 0.458 | |||
| > 20 years | 0.083 (-0.363, 0.530) | 0.714 | 0.391 (-0.707, 1.490) | 0.485 | |||
| Employment Status | Discontinuous | -ref.- | -ref.- | ||||
| Permanent | 0.035 (-0.043, 0.113) | 0.377 | 0.125 (-0.066, 0.317) | 0.199 | |||
| Interim | 0.025 (-0.044, 0.094) | 0.481 | -0.053 (-0.224, 0.117) | 0.540 | |||
| Non-permanent/temporary | -0.032 (-0.149, 0.085) | 0.590 | -0.115 (-0.403, 0.173) | 0.433 | |||
| Hiring Authority | Healthcare | -ref.- | -ref.- | ||||
| Education | -0.045 (-0.132, 0.042) | 0.309 | -0.021 (-0.235, 0.193) | 0.847 | |||
| Others | -0.030 (-0.133, 0.073) | 0.564 | -0.002 (-0.255, 0.251) | 0.990 | |||
| Relationship with other institutions | Primary Care | -ref.- | -ref.- | -ref.- | |||
| City Council | 0.190 (-0.013, 0.393) | 0.067 | -0.801 (-1.301, -0.302) | 0.002 | -0.825 (-1.316, -0.333) | 0.001 | |
| Other | 0.026 (-0.099, 0.151) | 0.683 | -0.157 (-0.465, 0.152) | 0.319 | -0.184 (-0.483, 0.114) | 0.226 | |
| No response | 0.072 (-0.023, 0.166) | 0.136 | 0.032 (-0.199, 0.264) | 0.783 | 0.042 (-0.184, 0.269) | 0.714 | |
| Own Records | -0.022 (-0.206, 0.163) | 0.817 | -0.147 (-0.601, 0.306) | 0.524 | |||
| Weekly Hours | <=15 hours | -ref.- | -ref.- | -ref.- | |||
| (15, 30] hours | -0.102 (-0.309, 0.105) | 0.333 | 0.453 (-0.057, 0.963) | 0.082 | 0.537 (0.037, 1.037) | 0.035 | |
| (30, 37.5] hours | -0.146 (-0.314, 0.022) | 0.089 | 0.234 (-0.180, 0.647) | 0.268 | 0.268 (-0.142, 0.677) | 0.199 | |
| >37.5 hours | -0.171 (-0.359, 0.018) | 0.076 | 0.538 (0.074, 1.003) | 0.023 | 0.591 (0.134, 1.048) | 0.011 | |
| No response | -0.129 (-0.296, 0.039) | 0.132 | 0.168 (-0.244, 0.580) | 0.423 | 0.200 (-0.209, 0.608) | 0.338 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).