Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Quality of Life in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Is Associated with Affective Temperament Traits: A Cross-Sectional Survey of a Polish Clinical Sample

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

20 December 2024

Posted:

24 December 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Background: Affective temperaments can be considered the subclinical manifestations of affective and stress-related disorders, which could have a relationship with many chronic diseases. The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of affective temperament traits on disease-specific quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), two types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: The study included 116 patients with IBD - 61 with UC and 55 with CD, with mean age 43 years, in remission, without serious mental or medical co-morbidities. The patients completed the Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis Pisa Paris San Diego-Auto-questionnaire (TEMPS-A), which is the 110-item self-reported assessment for five dimensions of temperament: depressive, cyclothymic, hyperthymic, irritable and anxious, already validated in Poland. For comprehensive assessment of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was applied. Results: Mean HRQoL in IBD patients was poor and mean IBDQ scores were 145, despite clinical remission. A significant negative correlation was found between HRQoL in all the IBDQ domains and TEMPS-A traits: D (p<0.001), C (p<0.01), I (p<0.05) and A (p<0.001). No significant correlation between hyperthymic temperament and IBDQ scores was found. Conclusions: Poor quality of life in IBD could be associated with affective temperament. Affective temperament traits should be taken into account when identifying patients at riskof worse IBD course and further introducing the personalized therapy.

Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), are chronic remitting-relapsing diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. The prevalence of IBD today exceeds 0.3% of the total population in countries like Canada, the United States, New Zealand, Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom [1]. Patients with IBD are dealing with many problems, as stress related to their health issues, fear for relapses, emotional and cognitive adaptation to the disease, psychological effects of illness and treatment, changes in the family organization and the social environment [2,3,4].
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is poor in IBD compared to other chronic conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, migraine headaches [5]. In many studies, this low quality of life has been correlated with disease activity [2,6,7,8,9]. However, the reduced quality of life may not always be explained by the disease exacerbation, and the level of HRQoL does not always depend on the severity of the disease symptoms. There are many patients who have psychological difficulties despite being in remission [10,11,12]. In IBD patients, compared to general population, depression and anxiety disorders and symptoms are more commonly reported [13]. Epidemiological studies show that anxiety and depression are the most prevalent psychiatric disorders among IBD patients [14,15,16,17].
Temperament is regarded as an inherited part of personality and represents the biologically stable core of emotional reactivity [18]. Affective temperaments (depressive, cyclothymic, hyperthymic, irritable and anxious) are subclinical, trait-related manifestations and commonly the antecedents of minor and major mood disorders [19]. In the literature, affective temperaments have been reported to correlate with a broad variety of pathological conditions ranging from somatic to psychiatric disorders [20]. Besides their associations with affective disorders, substance abuse and eating disorders, affective temperaments have been found to be related to somatic diseases, like hypertension, coronary events, obesity and diabetes mellitus [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Data on the influence of affective temperaments on gastrointestinal disturbances are sparse [26]. Moreover, psychological studies rarely present data from Eastern Europe.
Our study aimed at assessing whether affective temperament traits could influence HRQoL in patients with IBD. Identifying the variables associated with the decline in HRQoL could be important in order to identify patients at risk of poorer biopsychosocial outcomes and further introducing the personalized therapy.

2. Materials and Methods

Overall, 116 patients with IBD were recruited to this cross-sectional survey study from the gastroenterology university clinic in Lodz, Poland. Patients were eligible for the study if they had a diagnosis of UC or CD verified by endoscopy and histology, were >18 years old, were on stable medication (4 weeks), and were willing to participate in a study. Exclusion criteria were active IBD phase, severe mental disorders, current psychotherapy and accompanying major medical illness.
All IBD patients were in clinical and endoscopic remission and presented Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score less than 150 for CD patients and Mayo score less than 3 for UC patients. Basic demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with IBD are shown in Table 1.
Outcome Variables:
Participants completed the Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris, San Diego-Auto-questionnaire (TEMPS-A), which is the 110-item self-related assessment tool for evaluation of five dimensions of affective temperament: depressive (D), cyclothymic (C), hyperthymic (H), irritable (I) and anxious A), already validated in Poland [27,28]. The scoring for each scale was calculated using a mathematical formula: sum of scoring of the variables belonged to such category / number of variables (nv): (v1 + v2 + ….vx)/nv. The following items belonged to such categories: depressive temperament, items 1–21 (21 traits); cyclothymic temperament, items 22–42 (21 traits); hyperthymic temperament, items 43–63 (21 traits); irritable temperament, items 64–84 (21 traits); anxious temperament, items 85–110 (26 traits). Subjects were asked to answer for all 110 questions YES or NOT, where Yes was marked as “1”, No was marked as “0. A higher score indicated higher intensity of affective temperament in the given category.
Affective temperaments are not associated with poorer overall outcomes when they appear in a mild form, but when they occur in extreme form [20]. Thus, we categorized patients into a group that had a low intensity of a given temperament (<0.5), moderate (0.5-0.7) and a strong intensity of this temperament (> 0.7).
To obtain comprehensive assessment of HRQoL, patients completed the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ). The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire measuring quality of life in IBD.3,4 Each item is scored on a 7-level Lickert’s scale (1–7), where 1 means the lowest and 7 the best quality of life of investigated patients. The IBDQ consist of four 4 subscales, measuring different aspects of quality of life: emotional function (worried, feeling depressed, frustrated), social function (function in leisure and work), systemic symptoms (being tired, having sleep problems, lack of energy), and bowel function (stool consistency, frequency, pain). Cutoff values for the IBDQ remission were 168 [29].
Sociodemographic variables as well as clinical features were also collected.

Statistical Analysis

The distribution of each variable was checked using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Homogeneity of variance was evaluated using the Levene test. The criteria for normality were not met, therefore non-parametric tests were used. Two groups were compared using a Mann–Whitney U-test, and more than two groups were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance. P value of < 0.05 was considered as the measure of statistical significance.
Ethical statement permission for the study was obtained from the Bioethical Commission of the Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz. The purpose and procedure of the study was explained to the patients, who expressed interest in participation. In line with the Bioethics Committee’s consent guidelines, patients were asked to give their written informed consent to participate in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

3. Results

Mean HRQoL in IBD patients was moderate and mean IBDQ scores were 145 (range 61-220). Among IBD patients, those with UC had lower IBDQ scores compared to CD patients in all domains, but the difference was not statistically significant (Table 2).
The most common combination of affective traits was: depressive, cyclothymic and anxious and these traits reached the highest scores (Table 3). Irritable temperament scores were significantly higher in CD compared to UC patients (p<0.01). Others TEMPS-A mean scores of patients with CD did not differ as compared to UC patients (See Appendix).
When categorized into a group that had a low intensity of a given temperament (<0.5), moderate (0.5-0.7) and a strong intensity of this temperament (> 0.7), in 25 patients (22%) we found three and more affective temperament traits with scores of more than 0.5. In 37 patients (33%), at least one score was more than 0.7.
A significant negative correlation was found between HRQoL in all IBDQ domains and TEMPS-A traits: D (p<0,001), C (p<0,01), I (p<0,05) and A (p<0,001) (Table 4, Fig.1). No significant correlation between hyperthymic temperament and IBDQ scores was found (Table 4).
TEMPS-A correlation with clinical factors analysis was also carried out for the effects assessment of gender, age, BMI and history of pharmacotherapy and surgical treatment (data shown in Appendix). We only found lower cyclothymic TEMPS scores in the group of patients treated with anti-TNF medications, lower depressive scores in patients treated with AZT and more women with higher intensity anxious TEMPS traits (Appendix).

4. Discussion

Study of Rubin et al. confirmed that patients with UC experience a significantly higher psychological burden, and their symptoms are frequently more disruptive to their lives, relationships, and emotional state than for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, or migraine headaches [5]. There is growing interest to identify factors involved in HRQoL decrease in IBD patients [30,31]. Many studies point to the disease activity’s impact on the wellbeing in this group [32,33]. However, among IBD patients there is a considerable number of individuals who have low QoL despite being in clinical remission [30]. Literature shows that they report worries and concerns regarding complications, stigmatization or intimacy, as well as concerns regarding their management plan or effective treatments - worries which are present also during remission [5,34].
Our patients’ quality of life, despite clinical and endoscopic remission, was poor. Using TEMPS-A questionnaire we found that there is a considerable number of IBD patients with high intensity of affective personality traits. Furthermore, we found a significant negative correlation between HRQoL in the IBDQ domains and TEMPS-A traits: depressive, cyclothymic, irritable and anxious. The findings indicate that the greater the share of affective traits, the poorer the quality of lifein all but one IBDQ domains - emotional, social, systemic and bowel.
The hyperthymic temperament which was not a significant correlate of HRQoL in our study has been reported to have a uniquely protective effect against mental disorders [35]. Persons with this type of temperament have chronic low-grade hypomanic symptoms-high energy, need less sleep than others and are characterized by chronic optimism as well as risk taking. Hyperthymic temperament is independent from other affective temperaments and this difference is well seen in our study. In Bielinski et al. study hyperthymic temperament in IBD patients was associated with lower symptoms of anxiety and depression measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [26].
On the other hand, other dimensions of affective temperament in Bielinski et al. study exhibited statistically significant positive correlations with the severity of anxiety and depression, except for the irritable temperament, which did not reach significance in patients with CD [26]. There is a big difference between the hyperthymic temperament, and the cyclothymic, depressive, irritable and anxious ones, which are closer to mental and substance use disorders, and could determine somatic diseases [20]. These characteristic difference between hyperthymic and others affective traits was also seen in our study.
In our study the results of the TEMPS-A questionnaire did not correlate with factors that could worsen the course of the disease, such as the number of relapses, duration of the disease, and the history of at least one surgical operation.
Similarly in the study by Bieliński et al. the number of surgical procedures was not related to the TEMPS-A subscales for IBD patients. The correlation of the TEMPS-A scale with the total score of the CDAI clinical scale did not show significant results [26].
To date, the temperamental profile’s association with HRQoL has not been examined in a sample of IBD outpatients.
Vidal et al. used the Temperament and Character Inventory for assessing the personality traits and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for assessing psychopathology and its influence on HRQoL in IBD patients. These authors showed that disease activity and psychological distress were the strongest predictors of QoL impairment [30].
Poor HRQoL concerned the patients who were more insecure (high scores on Harm Avoidance), obsessive (high scores on Persistence), and less able to deal with problems (low scores on Self-Directness). Only one personality trait (Self-Directness) was an independent predictor of one QoL dimension (Emotional dimension). The authors concluded that personality may be an indirect predictor of psychological distress, which directly impacts on QoL [30].
Another study that examined 120 IBD patients concluded that some personality factors are associated with poorer QoL of patients with IBD [36]. These authors used the IBDQ, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the Neuroticism scale of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. They found self-esteem was the factor most closely related to social functioning and neuroticism - the most closely related to the four indicators of quality of life [36].
Affective temperament is considered a stable construct associated with genetic transmission and could serve as a phenotype to detect genes responsible for a susceptibility to affective disorders [28,37].
However, some authors suggested that there are some factors which could impact temperamental dimensions, like immune system or chronic inflammation. Pessimism contributed to increase of inflammation markers, like IL-6 and the C reactive protein [38]. It has been shown that a positive attitude may affect the immune system, by for example lowering the IL-6 response to the stress factors [39,40]. Patients suffering from other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as multiple sclerosis or rheumatoid arthritis, have been shown to be at the increased risk of psychiatric comorbidity [41]. There was the associations between adolescent temperament and inflammation. Higher negative emotionality was significantly associated with higher CRP levels. Furthermore, these associations were larger than those for depressive symptoms [42].
The question remains as to whether inflammation can affect temperament, or the mechanism is opposite. This issue could explain different disease course in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Stress is one of the strongest predictors of disease course in IBD, in which the immune system responds in an exaggerated way to gut bacteria, a reaction triggered by environmental factors [43]. IBD is increasingly considered to be a disorder of the gut–brain axis. Patients with anxiety whose IBD was in remission at baseline had a twofold increase in the risk of a future flare of IBD. The inflammatory changes in IBD can lead to sensitization, even when patients are in remission [43]. It could also explain poor quality of life in our IBD patients in remission.
On the other hand inflammatory mechanisms might have a role in the aetiology of depression, with plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL-1 and IL-6 predicting its onset [43,44]. Antidepressants are hypothesized to treat mental illness via immunoregulatory pathways, by decreasing levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF52, IL-6, IL-1β and IL-10 [43,45] .
More research on psychoneuroimmunology or the influence of environmental factors on the affective temperament is needed.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that affective temperament traits have negative impact on quality of life in IBD patients. There is a considerable number of individuals who have low QoL despite being in clinical remission and these findings will promote a better understanding of these patients. Personality traits should be taken into account when using IBDQ in studies as well as in management with IBD patients.
Affective temperaments represent adaptive dispositions whose dysregulation can lead to full-blown affective pathology.
We have identified a subgroup of IBD patients with higher that 0,7 intensity of affective traits and we think that these patients need specialmedical attention.
Controlling and minimizing the symptoms of the disease, along with the identification and treatment of psychopathology, should become integral aspects of IBD care to improve HRQoL of these patients. These results provide an additional evidence for the need for personalized interventions in these group of patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M., E.M-W. and A.B.; methodology, M.K.; software, A.M.; formal analysis, A.M.; investigation, A.M.; resources, A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, E.M-W. and A.B.; supervision, E.M-W.; project administration, A.B.; funding acquisition, E.M-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

The research was financed by the Medical University of Lodz from the research task number 502-03/1-002-01/502-14-245.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical statement permission for the study was obtained from the Bioethical Commission of the Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz. The purpose and procedure of the study was explained to the patients, who have agreed to participate in it. In line with the Bioethics Committee’s consent, patients were asked to give their written informed consent to participate in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table. TEMPS-A correlation with clinical factors
TEMPS -D Total
<0.5 >=0.5
N % N % N %
group CD 40 50.0 12 40.0 52 47.3 0.3495
UC 40 50.0 18 60.0 58 52.7
Gender 0 40 50.0 17 56.7 57 51.8 0.5331
1 40 50.0 13 43.3 53 48.2
ASA 0 9 11.3 2 6.7 11 10.0 0.4755
1 71 88.8 28 93.3 99 90.0
AZT 0 51 63.8 26 86.7 77 70.0 0.0195
1 29 36.3 4 13.3 33 30.0
Anty-TNF 0 53 66.3 25 83.3 78 70.9 0.0789
1 27 33.8 5 16.7 32 29.1
surgery 0 59 73.8 23 76.7 82 74.5 0.7545
1 21 26.3 7 23.3 28 25.5
TEMPS -C P
<0.5 >=0.5
N % N %
group CD 30 44.1 22 52.4 0.3990
UC 38 55.9 20 47.6
gender 0 33 48.5 24 57.1 0.3797
1 35 51.5 18 42.9
5-ASA 0 5 7.4 6 14.3 0.2390
1 63 92.6 36 85.7
AZT 0 46 67.6 31 73.8 0.4932
1 22 32.4 11 26.2
Anty-TNF 0 53 77.9 25 59.5 0.0388
1 15 22.1 17 40.5
surgery 0 52 76.5 30 71.4 0.5553
1 16 23.5 12 28.6
TEMPS – H P
<0.5 >=0.5
N % N %
group CD 31 44.9 21 51.2 0.5227
UC 38 55.1 20 48.8
gender 0 36 52.2 21 51.2 0.9228
1 33 47.8 20 48.8
5-ASA 0 8 11.6 3 7.3 0.4697
1 61 88.4 38 92.7
AZT 0 52 75.4 25 61.0 0.1114
1 17 24.6 16 39.0
Anty-TNF 0 53 76.8 25 61.0 0.0770
1 16 23.2 16 39.0
surgery 0 51 73.9 31 75.6 0.8434
1 18 26.1 10 24.4
TEMPS – I P
<0.5 >=0.5
N % N %
group CD 44 43.6 8 88.9 0.0091
UC 57 56.4 1 11.1
gender 0 53 52.5 4 44.4 0.6441
5-ASA 0 9 8.9 2 22.2 0.2021
1 92 91.1 7 77.8
AZT 0 71 70.3 6 66.7 0.8199
1 30 29.7 3 33.3
Anty-TNF 0 73 72.3 5 55.6 0.2899
1 28 27.7 4 44.4
surgery 0 76 75.2 6 66.7 0.5712
1 25 24.8 3 33.3
TEMPS – A P
<0.5 >=0.5
N % N %
group CD 34 46.6 18 48.6 0.8370
UC 39 53.4 19 51.4
gender 0 32 43.8 25 67.6 0.0186
1 41 56.2 12 32.4
5-ASA 0 7 9.6 4 10.8 0.8401
1 66 90.4 33 89.2
AZT 0 50 68.5 27 73.0 0.6281
1 23 31.5 10 27.0
Anty-TNF 0 53 72.6 25 67.6 0.5828
1 20 27.4 12 32.4
surgery 0 54 74.0 28 75.7 0.8464
1 19 26.0 9 24.3
TEMPS-D
<0.5 0.5-0.7
Mean Standard Deviation Mean Standard Deviation
age 42.81 16.45 44.30 13.48
BMI 23.83 4.60 23.87 4.38
p>0.5 for age and BMI.
TEMPS-C
<0.5 0.5-0.7
Mean Standard Deviation Mean Standard Deviation
age 43.73 16.31 42.39 14.63
BMI 24.18 4.77 23.29 4.09
p>0.5 for age and BMI
TEMPS-H
<0.5 0.5-0.7
Mean Standard Deviation Mean Standard Deviation
age 43.96 14.92 41.98 16.90
BMI 23.57 4.54 24.29 4.50
p>0.5 for age and BMI
TEMPS-I
<0.5 0.5-0.7
Mean Standard Deviation Mean Standard Deviation
age 43.27 15.83 42.63 13.84
BMI 23.81 4.52 24.11 4.73
p>0.5 for age and BMI
TEMPS-A
<0.5 0.5-0.7
Mean Standard Deviation Mean Standard Deviation
age 42.24 16.28 45.19 14.28
BMI 23.85 4.76 23.81 4.06
p>0.5 for age and BMI

References

  1. Chaparro, M.; Garr, A.; Núñez Ortiz, A. 1. Incidence, Clinical Characteristics and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Spain: Large-Scale Epidemiological Study. J Clin Med. 2021, 10, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Drossman, D.A.; Leserman, J.; Li, Z.M.; Mitchell, C.M.; Zagami, E.A.; Patrick, D.L. The rating form of IBD patient concerns: a new measure of health status. Psychosom. Med. 1991, 53, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mokrowiecka, A.; Pinkowski, D.; Malecka-Panas, E.; Johnson, C.D. Clinical, emotional and social factors associated with quality of life in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2010, 10, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Turnbull, G.K.; Vallis, M.T. Quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease: the interaction of disease activity with psychosocial function. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1995, 90, 1450–1454. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Rubin, D.T.; Dubinsky, M.C.; Panaccione, R.; Siegel, C.A.; Binion, D.G.; Kane, S.V.; Hopper, J. The impact of ulcerative colitis on patients' lives compared to other chronic diseases: a patient survey. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2010, 55, 1044–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bernklev, T.; Jahnsen, J.; Lygren, I.; Henriksen, M.; Vatn, M.; Moum, B. Health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease measured with the short form-36: psychometric assessments and a comparison with general population norms. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2005, 11, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bernklev, T.; Jahnsen, J.; Henriksen, M.; Lygren, I.; Aadland, E.; Sauar, J.; Schulz, T.; Stray, N.; Vatn, M.; Moum, B. Relationship between sick leave, unemployment, disability, and health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2006, 12, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hoivik, M.L.; Moum, B.; Solberg, I.C.; Cvancarova, M.; Hoie, O.; Vatn, M.H.; Bernklev, T. , for the IBSEN Study Group. Health-related quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis after a 10-year disease course: Results from the IBSEN study. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mokrowiecka, A.; Jurek, K.; Pińkowski, D.; Małecka-Panas, E. The comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) in patients with GERD, peptic ulcer disease and ulcerative colitis. Adv. Med. Sci. 2006, 51, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Tanaka, M.; Kazuma, K. Ulcerative colitis: factors affecting difficulties of life and psychological well being of patients in remission. J. Clin. Nurs. 2005, 14, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Taft, T.H.; Keefer, L.; Leonhard, C.; Nealon-Woods, M. Impact of perceived stigma on inflammatory bowel disease patient outcomes. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2009, 15, 1224–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jäghult, S.; Saboonchi, F.; Johansson, U.B.; Wredling, R.; Kapraali, M. Identifying predictors of low health-related quality of life among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: comparison between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis with disease duration. J. Clin. Nurs. 2011, 20, 1578–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Loftus, E.V. Jr; Guérin, A.; Yu, A.P.; Wu, E.Q.; Yang, M.; Chao, J.; Mulani, P.M. Increased risks of developing anxiety and depression in young patients with Crohn's disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 106, 1670–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Meder, A.; Świątkowski, M.; Meder, G.; Koza, J. Quality of life and coexisting anxiety-depressive disorders in patients with inflammatory bowel disease during relapse and a further 11 months observation. Gastroenterol. Pol. 2010, 17, 273–279. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tribbick, D.; Salzberg, M.; Ftanou, M.; Connell, W.R.; Macrae, F.; Kamm, M.A.; Bates, G.W.; Cunningham, G.; Austin, D.W.; Knowles, S.R. Prevalence of mental health disorders in inflammatory bowel disease: an Australian outpatient cohort. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2015, 17, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mikocka-Walus, A.; Massuger, W.; Knowles, S.R.; Moore, G.T.; Buckton, S.; Connell, W.; Pavli, P.; Raven, L.; Andrews, J.M. Psychological distress is highly prevalent in inflammatory bowel disease: A survey of psychological needs and attitudes. JGH. Open. 2019, 4, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mikocka-Walus, A.; Hanlon, I.; Dober, M.; Emerson, C.; Beswick, L.; Selinger, C.; Taylor, J.; Olive, L.; Evans, S.; Hewitt, C. Lived experience in people with inflammatory bowel disease and comorbid anxiety and depression in the United Kingdom and Australia. J. Health. Psychol. 2020, 1359105320911427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nemcsik, J.; Vecsey-Nagy, M.; Szilveszter, B.; Kolossváry, M.; Karády, J.; László, A.; Kőrösi, B.; Nemcsik-Bencze, Z.; Gonda, X.; Merkely, B.; Rihmer, Z.; Maurovich-Horvat, P. Inverse association between hyperthymic affective temperament and coronary atherosclerosis: A coronary computed tomography angiography study. J. Psychosom. Res. 2017, 103, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rihmer, Z.; Akiskal, K.K.; Rihmer, A.; Akiskal, H.S. Current research on affective temperaments, Curr. Opin. Psychiatry. 2010, 23, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rovai, L.; Maremmani, A.G.; Rugani, F.; Bacciardi, S.; Pacini, M.; Dell'Osso, L.; Akiskal, H.S.; Maremmani, I. Do Akiskal & Mallya's affective temperaments belong to the domain of pathology or to that of normality? Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, Review. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Laszlo, A.; Tabak, B.; Korosi, D.; Eorsi, P.; Torzsa, O.; Cseprekal, O.; Tislér, A.; Reusz, G.; Nemcsik-Bencze, Z.; Gonda, X.; Rihmer, Z.; Nemcsik, J. Association of affective temperaments with blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients: a cross-sectional study, BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2016, 16, 158. [Google Scholar]
  22. Eory, A.; Rozsa, S.; Torzsa, P.; Kalabay, L.; Gonda, X.; Rihmer, Z. Affective temperaments contribute to cardiac complications in hypertension independently of depression. Psychother. Psychosom. 2014, 83, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marek, L.; Placek, W.; Borkowska, A. Zaburzenia funkcji poznawczych i temperament afektywny u pacjentów z łuszczycą. Przegl. Dermatolog. 2011, 98, 483–490. [Google Scholar]
  24. Borkowska, A.; Bieliński, M.; Szczęsny, W.; Szwed, K.; Tomaszewska, M.; Kałwa, A.; Lesiewska, N.; Junik, R.; Gołębiewski, M.; Sikora, M.; Tretyn, A.; Akiskal, K.; Akiskal, H. Effect of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism on affective temperament, depression and body mass index in obesity. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 184, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gois, C.; Akiskal, H.; Akiskal, K.; Figueira, M.L. The relationship between temperament, diabetes and depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 142 Suppl, S67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bieliński, M.; Lesiewska, N.; Bielińska, J.; Liebert, A.; Mieczkowski, A.; Sopońska-Brzoszczyk, P.; Brzoszczyk, B.; Kłopocka, M.; Borkowska, A. Affective temperament in inflammatory bowel diseases: Another brick in the wall of differentiation. PLoS. One. 2018, 13, e0205606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Borkowska, A.; Rybakowski, J.K.; Drozdz, W.; Bielinski, M.; Kosmowska, M.; Rajewska-Rager, A.; Bucinski, A.; Akiskal, K.K.; Akiskal, H.S. Polish validation of the TEMPS-A: the profile of affective temperaments in a college student population. J. Affect. Disord. 2010, 123, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Akiskal, H.S.; Akiskal, K.K.; Haykal, R.F.; Haykal, R.F.; Manning, J.S.; Connor, P.D. TEMPS-A: progress towards validation of a self-rated clinical version of the temperament evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire. J. Affect. Disord. 2005, 85, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hlavaty, T.; Persoons, P.; Vermeire, S.; Ferrante, M.; Pierik, M.; Van Assche, G.; Rutgeerts, P. Evaluation of short-term responsiveness and cutoff values of inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire in Crohn's disease. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2006, 12, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Vidal, A.; Gómez-Gil, E.; Sans, M.; Portella, M.J.; Salamero, M.; Piqué, J.M.; Panés, J. Health-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease patients: the role of psychopathology and personality. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2008, 14, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sainsbury, A.; Heatley, R.V. Review article: psychosocial factors in the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 21, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Janke, K.H.; Klump, B.; Gregor, M.; Meisner, C.; Haeuser, W. Determinant of life satisfaction in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2005, 11, 272–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Verma, S.; Tsai, H.H.; Giaffer, M.H. Does better disease-related education improve quality of life? A survey of IBD patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2001, 46, 865–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lönnfors, S.; Vermeire, S.; Greco, M.; Hommes, M.; Bell, C.; Avedano, L. IBD and health-related quality of life -- discovering the true impact. J. Crohns. Colitis. 2014, 8, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Karam, E.G.; Salamoun, M.M.; Yeretzian, J.S.; Mneimneh, Z.N.; Karam, A.N.; Fayyad, J.; Hantouche, E.; Akiskal, K.; Akiskal, H.S. The role of anxious and hyperthymic temperaments in mental disorders: a national epidemiologic study. World Psychiatry. 2010, 9, 103–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Moreno-Jiménez, B.; López Blanco, B.; Rodríguez-Muñoz, A.; Garrosa Hernández, E. The influence of personality factors on health-related quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J. Psychosom. Res. 2007, 62, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Perugi, G.; Toni, C.; Maremmani, I.; Tusini, G.; Ramacciotti, S.; Madia, A.; Fornaro, M.; Akiskal, H.S. The influence of affective temperaments and psychopathological traits on the definition of bipolar disorder subtypes: a study on bipolar I Italian national sample. J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 136, e41–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Roy, B.; Diez-Roux, A.V.; Seeman, T.; Ranjit, N.; Shea, S.; Cushman, M. Association of optimism and pessimism with inflammation and hemostasis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Psychosom. Med. 2010, 72, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cohen, S.; Doyle, W.J.; Turner, R.; Alper, C.M.; Skoner, D.P. Sociability and susceptibility to the common cold. Psychol. Sci. 2003, 14, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brydon, L.; Walker, C.; Wawrzyniak, A.J.; Chart, H.; Steptoe, A. Dispositional optimism and stress-induced changes in immunity and negative mood. Brain Behav. Immun. 2009, 23, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Marrie, R.A.; Walld, R.; Bolton, J.M.; Sareen, J.; Walker, J.R.; Patten, S.B.; Singer, A.; Lix, L.M.; Hitchon, C.A.; El-Gabalawy, R.; Katz, A.; Fisk, J.D.; Bernstein, C.N.; CIHR Team in Defining the Burden and Managing the Effects of Psychiatric Comorbidity in Chronic Immunoinflammatory Disease. Increased incidence of psychiatric disorders in immune-mediated inflammatory disease. J. Psychosom. Res. 2017, 101, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nelson, B.W.; Byrne, M.L.; Simmons, J.G.; Whittle, S.; Schwartz, O.S.; O'Brien-Simpson, N.M.; Walsh, K.A.; Reynolds, E.C.; Allen, N.B. Adolescent temperament dimensions as stable prospective risk and protective factors for salivary C-reactive protein. Br. J. Health. Psychol. 2018, 23, 186–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mikocka-Walus, A.; Ford, A.C.; Drossman, D.A. Antidepressants in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Raedler, T. J. Inflammatory mechanisms in major depressive disorder. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2011, 24, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. O’Brien, S.M.; Scott, L.V.; Dinan, T.G. Antidepressant therapy and C-reactive protein levels. Br. J. Psychiatry 2006, 188, 449–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Basic demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with IBD.
Table 1. Basic demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with IBD.
CD (n=55) UC
(n=61)
IBD
(n=116)
Mean age, range (Years) 39
(19-69)
46
(21-84)
43
(19-84)
Male gender (, n (%)) 24
(44%)
31
(51%)
55
(47%)
Mean BMI (kg/m2) 23
(16-34)
24.4
(14-37)
23.87
(14-37)
Ongoing pharmacotherapy
n (%)

5-amino- ASA 44 (80) 59 (97) 103 (89)
Azathiopryne 26 (47) 10 (16) 36 (31)
Anty-TNF 31 (56) 4 (6) 35 (30)
Medical history
n (%)
Relapses
0
1x
2-5 x
>5 x

6 (11)
11 (20)
27 (49)
11 (20)

3 (5)
10 (16)
32 (52)
16 (26)

10 (7)
21 (18)
58 (50)
27 (23)

Surgery* 23 (42) 7 (11) 30 (26)

Disease duration

<1 year
<10 ys
10-20 ys
>20 ys



3 (5)
43 (78)
8 (14)
1 (2)



1 (2)
43 (70)
8 (13)
9 (15)



4 (3)
86 (74)
16 (14)
10 (9)
* No of patients who had undergone at least one surgery.
Table 2. IBDQ mean scores in IBD groups.
Table 2. IBDQ mean scores in IBD groups.
Mean scores IBDQ IBD CD UC Statistical significance
IBDQ bowel 48.86 50 47.5 p>0.05
IBDQ emotion 53 54 52.5 p>0.05
IBDQ systemic 19.9 20,5 19.4 p>0.05
IBDQ social 23.6 24 23 p>0.05
IBDQ total 145 148.6 142.5 p>0.05
Table 3. Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis Pisa Paris San Diego-Auto-questionnaire (TEMPS-A) results in IBD patients.
Table 3. Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis Pisa Paris San Diego-Auto-questionnaire (TEMPS-A) results in IBD patients.
Mean scores Median Minimum Maximum SD
TEMPS D 0.39 0.33 0.05 0.95 0.18
TEMPS-C 0.42 0.38 0.00 1.00 0.25
TEMPS-H 0.41 0.38 0.05 0.95 0.20
TEMPS-I 0.23 0.22 0.00 0.80 0.18
TEMPS-A 0.387155 0.346154 0.00 1.00 0.24
Table 4. ANOVA statistics correlation between IBDQ domains and TEMPS-A scores*.
Table 4. ANOVA statistics correlation between IBDQ domains and TEMPS-A scores*.
TEMPS-A ANXIOUS TEMPS-A
IRRITABLE
TEMPS-A CYCLOTHYMIC TEMPS-A DEPRESSIVE TEMPS-A HYPERTHYMIC
F Sig. F Sig. F Sig. F Sig. F Sig.
bowel 6.570 .012 6.560 .012 3.971 .049 6.253 .014 .094 .759
emotional 23.878 .000 4.669 .033 13.213 .000 21.579 .000 .865 .354
systemic 13.039 .000 4.071 .046 6.974 .010 18.185 .000 1.127 .291
social 6.808 .010 2.105 .150 4.834 .030 8.601 .004 .476 .492
IBDQ 15.523 .000 5.489 .021 9.094 .003 16.258 .000 .368 .546
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level (bold).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated