Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

A Comprehensive Review of Fc Gamma Receptors and Their Role in SLE

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

17 December 2024

Posted:

17 December 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Receptors for the Immunoglobulin G Constant Fraction (FcγRs) are widely expressed in cells of the immune system. Complement-independent phagocytosis prompted FcγR research to show that the engagement of IgG immune complexes with FcγRs triggers a variety of cell host immune responses, such as phagocytosis, antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity, and NETosis, among others. However, variants of these receptors have been implicated in the development of and susceptibility to autoimmune diseases, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Currently, the knowledge of FcγR variants is a required field of antibody therapeutics, which includes the en-gineering of recombinant soluble human Fc gamma receptors, enhancing the inhibitory and blocking of the activating FcγRs function, vaccines, and organ transplantation. Importantly, recent interest in FcγRs is the Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE), a mechanism by which the pathogenesis of certain viral infections is enhanced. ADEs may be responsible for the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, FcγRs have become a current research topic. Therefore, this review briefly describes some of the historical knowledge about the FcγR type I family in humans, including the structure, affinity, mechanism of ligand binding, FcγRs in diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and the potential therapeutic approaches related to these receptors in SLE.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Human Fc receptors for IgG (FcγR) constitute a family of receptors that are genomically located on the long arm of chromosome 1 in band 1.21 and 1.22[1,2,3,4,5]. FcγRs are widely distributed in almost all immune cells. These receptors exert diverse functions through engagement with the Fc fraction of immunoglobulin G complexes, which are canonical ligands[6]. The ability of FcγRs to engage IgG Fc fragments allows responsiveness to all antigens opsonized with IgG. This versatility gives FcγRs a pivotal function in host defense and clearance of immune complexes. However, an alteration in FcγR function could result in impaired host defense or autoimmunity. As a result, FcγRs have become a key group of receptors, the variants of which are related to susceptibility or protection against autoimmune diseases. In addition, FcγRs are currently considered pharmacological targets of foremost importance. The mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies FcγR-mediated, and the engineering of Fc fragments of monoclonal antibodies aims to perform better and enhance binding to FcγRs. The study of FcγRs is a necessary and promising field of research. Hence, this review aims to bring together the essentials of the research timeline and immunobiology of these receptors that are known to date (Figure 1), their role in autoimmune diseases, with emphasis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and their role as mediators of pharmacological responses. The idea for this review arose from the desire to gather the elementary information that a scientist needs to know if he or she is just starting out in the study of FcγR and SLE.

2. FcγRs Classification, Function, Variants & Role in SLE Pathology

Human FcγRs are members of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily and can be distinguished based on size, affinity for ligands, primary structure, ligand specificity, and monoclonal antibody reactivity[27,43]. However, canonical type I FcγRs are generally classified as activating or inhibitory, depending on the signaling properties of their intracellular domains. The most important activating FcγRs include FcγRI (CD64), FcγRIIa (CD32a), and FcγRIIIa (CD16a), which contain or associates to immunoreceptor tyrosine activating motifs (ITAM)[44,45]. In contrast, FcγRIIb (CD32b) is the sole inhibitory FcγR that mediates signaling through an immunoreceptor tyrosine inhibitory motif (ITIM)[46]. In contrast to activating or inhibitory FcγRs, FcγRIIIb (CD16b) is expressed as a glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol-anchored (GPI) protein and is therefore incapable of signal transduction alone because it associates with activating receptors (such as FcγRIIa) to display a functional outcome[47]. Affinity is another broad classification criterion; FcγRI is the sole FcγR that engages monomeric IgG with high binding affinity[48]. Other FcγRs exhibit low affinity for monomeric IgGs but high affinity for multimeric IgG immune complexes (IC) or opsonized cells[49].
Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNAs encoding human FcγRI, FcγRII, and FcγRIII have indicated that they are structurally related and contain conserved extracellular ligand-binding regions of Ig-like domains and, as such, belong to the Ig superfamily[4,23,50,51,52,53,54,55].

1.1. FcγRI (CD64)

Structure: FcγRI is a type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein of ~70-kDa. FcγRI is structurally distinct and contains an extracellular immunoglobulin interactive region of three extracellular Ig-like domains in contrast to the two domains of the low-affinity receptors FcγRII and FcγRIII[50,56]. The third extracellular domain is different, whereas the first two domains are homologous to the extracellular domains of FcγRII and FcγRIII. The unique IgG-binding characteristics of FcγRI are conferred by domain three. Although this domain is not essential for Fc binding, it determines the specific high-affinity interaction between FcγRI and IgG2a[57]. The interaction between domains 2 and 3 of FcγRI and domain 1 plays a supporting role in maintaining the conformational stability of the receptor [30,58]. Moreover, FcγRI highlights a unique glycan recognition mechanism that adds structurally improved affinity[48].
Functions: FcγRI is predominantly expressed in myeloid cells, including monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells. Previous studies have indicated that FcγRIa plays a significant role in neutrophil recruitment during acute infectious diseases[59]. However, FcγRI is a unique FcγR that engages monomeric IgG with high binding affinity, which means that this receptor does not require immune complexes to activate the signalling pathway[48].
Role in SLE: Some studies have shown that monocyte surface expression of FcγRI correlates with type-I interferon levels in SLE[60]. The expression of FcγRI is increased in SLE and even more so in lupus nephritis. Additionally, FcγRI expression is positively associated with serum creatinine levels and indicators of systemic inflammation.
Monocytes from patients with high FcγRI expression also exhibited increased chemotaxis and capacity to produce monocyte chemotractic protein 1 (MCP-1) [61]. Recent studies have demonstrated that FcγRI is an essential component in the response of human neutrophils to immune complexes leading to the production of ROS, MCP-,1 and degranulation, which may help explain how neutrophils contribute to tissue damage associated with immune complex-associated disease, such as lupus[62].

1.2. FcγRII (CD32)

Structure: FcγRII isoforms FcγRIIa and FcγRIIb are type 1 transmembrane glycoproteins of ~ 40 kDa that contain extracellular regions of two Ig-like domains. The extracellular and transmembrane domains are highly conserved, and both isoforms display nearly identical ligand-binding domains, yet their intracytoplasmic regions differ: FcγRIIa contains ITAM, FcγRIIb contains ITIM, giving an antagonist functional outcome[63].

1.2.1. FcγRIIa

FcγRIIa is probably unique to higher primates, the most widespread in immune cells, and is the major phagocytic FcγR in humans[64].
Functions: FcγRIIa is a prototype phagocytic receptor belonging to the FcγR family. However, their function depends on the cells in which the receptor is expressed; macrophages and neutrophils show high efficiency of phagocytic activity through this receptor[65].
Single nucleotide variants: Because FcγRIIa is widely distributed in immune cells, Single Nucleotide Variants (SNV) that affect affinity ligand binding have been extensively studied. The most widely studied example is the change in arginine (R) by histidine (H) at 131 position. Individuals homozygous for the R allelic form of FcγRIIa are more susceptible to bacterial infections and autoimmune diseases than those homozygous and heterozygous for the H allelic form of FcγRIIa [66,67]. Binding studies using Ig fusion proteins of FcγRIIa alleles showed that the R allele has significantly lower binding affinity to IgG2, IgG1, and IgG3 subtypes[68]. The three-dimensional structure of the complex between both variants and the Fc region of humanized IgG1 has shown affinity binding differences mainly at the hinge level[64].
Role in SLE: It has been demonstrated that the mechanism of neutrophil activation in the pathogenesis of SLE requires DNA and RNA immune complexes (ICs) and this requires FcγRIIa engagement. SLE-derived ICs activate neutrophils to release ROS and chemokines in an FcγRIIa-dependent manner, it has been demonstrated through assays blocking FcγRIIa which inhibits ROS release from these cells. Dysregulation or activation of FcγRIIa in patients with SLE can contribute to the overproduction of autoantibodies, immune complex formation with consequent organ damage, and excessive inflammation that induces flares[69].

1.2.2. FcγRIIb

FcγRIIb is the sole inhibitory FcγR that confers to this receptor a different role in the modulatory scheme of Fcγ-activating receptors[70].
Functions: On innate immune cells, the inhibitory function of FcγRIIb directly antagonizes the activation of FcγRs; therefore, it equilibrates the cellular outcome, generating an inhibitory balance and attenuating the activation signaling, such as co-signaling molecules[39]. More importantly, this receptor crosslinks with the B-cell receptor (BCR), shaping the B repertoire of lymphocytes and inducing apoptosis in autoreactive plasma cells. Moreover, FcγRIIb signaling controls antibody levels involving the differential expression of the receptor on B cell subpopulations, in which FcγRIIb functions independently of the BCR to eliminate antibody-secreting effector cells and inhibit naïve B cell proliferation without compromising long-lived antigen-specific memory B cells[71,72].
Single nucleotide variants: Several polymorphisms have been described in FcγRIIb. The most important variants affect inhibitory capability. The most studied variants in the transmembrane domain are FcγRIIb Isoleucine (I) with threonine (T) at 187 position and isoleucine with threonine at 232 position. The FcγRIIb 187T variant is known to be excluded from lipid rafts and has decreased inhibitory potential toward BCR signaling[73,74,75]. Likewise, the FcγRIIb 232T variant decreases affinity to lipid rafts (this prevents interaction of FcγRIIb with ITAM-containing receptors, such as the activating FcγR and the BCR) and attenuates inhibitory effects on B cell receptor signaling[76]. The haplotype -386C/-120A (known as 2B.4, which is the less frequent haplotype) in the promoter confers an increased transcription of the receptor[77,78,79]. The haplotype 2B.4 allows the novo FcγRIIb expression on neutrophils and monocytes[80], which allows a modulatory effect.
Role in SLE: FcγRIIb T232I (rs1050501) leads to decreased suppressor activity, thereby enhancing the susceptibility to SLE. These genotype and allele frequencies of FcγRIIb are associated with incidence of leukopenia, rash, mucosal ulcer, arthritis, and thrombocytopenia in SLE patients, these parameters are taken into account in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), the main clinimetric tool to evaluate the remission and low disease states[81].
Therefore, FcγRIIb 232T is a dysfunctional receptor. Monocyte-derived macrophages from SLE patients with the 232T genotype showed increased FcγR-mediated VEGF-A production. Thus, ICs contribute to inflammation through VEGF-A-driven lymph node lymphangiogenesis, which is controlled by FcγRIIb [82].
Furthermore, the haplotype 2B.4, in the promoter has been associated with susceptibility to SLE in Europe, and paradoxically, confers protection against the development of lupus nephritis[77,78,79].
The importance of this receptor in SLE such that lupus-like mice models are generated with FcγRIIb knock-out[83]. In these animal models, it has also been shown that inflammatory systemic conditions, such as obesity, allergy, or conditions that can induce leaky gut, such as NSAIDs and alcohol, can cause permeability and endotoxemia, which can induce or worsen autoimmunity in the absence of the modulation/inhibition exerted by FcγRIIb. Specifically, obesity facilitates lupus onset and exacerbates lupus activity, partly through saturated fatty acid-induced gut barrier defects and systemic inflammation. Allergy makes dendritic cells more susceptible to hyperactivation, which activates lupus nephritis, as indicated by anti-dsDNA, proteinuria, and renal immune complex deposition. In NSAID enteropathy, mitochondrial function and cytokine production in macrophages are more prominent. Hence, lupus disease activation due to NSAID enteropathy-induced gut leakage is possible. Finally, alcohol induces more prominent liver damage and actives lupus like characteristics [84,85,86].

1.3. FcγRIII

Structure: There are two functional isoforms of FcγRIII. Human FcyRIII is heterogeneous in size with a molecular weight ranging from 50 to 80 kDa[21,24,87]. This heterogeneity is due to the extensive N-linked glycosylation of two distinct isoforms, FcyRIIIa and FcyRIIIb[50]. A single amino acid change determines the intracellular domain differences between FcyRIIIa and FcγRIIIb isoforms. Human FcyRIIIb contains Se203, which specifies a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) linked molecule, whereas FcyRIIIa contains Phe203, which disrupts the signal for the formation of a GPI anchor, thus preserving the transmembrane and cytoplasmic tail and producing a transmembrane molecule. Both are activating receptors and have different association requirements to display effective signalling[50].

1.3.1. FcγRIIIa

FcγRIIIa is an activating receptor that is recognized by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) function. The FcγRIIIa protein is expressed as a transmembrane protein on monocytes, tissue specific macrophages, dendritic cells, δ/γT cells, and natural killer cells[70].
Functions: ADCC is an Fc-dependent effector function of IgG that is important for antiviral immunity and antitumor therapies. NK cells mediate ADCC through the binding of antibody-opsonized target cells by membrane-expressed FcγRIIIa and induce cytotoxicity by releasing granzymes and perforins stored in intracellular granules. This mechanism contributes to the killing of tumor cells during immunotherapy. NK-cell mediated ADCC is mainly triggered by IgG-subclasses IgG1 and IgG3 through the IgG-Fc-receptor FcγRIIIa[88].
Single nucleotide variants: The most important variants are related to the development of autoimmune diseases. The best known is FcγRIIIa (rs396991) valine (V) by phenylalanine (F) at 158 position. This change affects the receptor affinity. The increased binding capacity of the 158V allele results in more robust downstream functional effects[89].
Role in SLE: FcγRIIIa 158F the allele with lower affinity is associated with SLE susceptibility in different ethnic groups[90]. However, FcγRIIIa 158V is associated with severity and progression to the final stages of renal involvement in SLE. This is consistent with the fact that FcγRIIIa 158V displays higher binding affinity to IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4 consistent with the functional outcome of this receptor promoting vigorous local inflammatory responses[91]. Case-control analyses have generated evidence that differs in the association of this polymorphism and SLE, so ethnicity and the triggers of the environment are important in the background to be considered so as not to generalize the role of the variants of this receptor. FcγRIIIa could induces over inflammation trough the interaction with immune complexes, with the consequent excessive activation of immune cells. The altered function of FcγRIIIa could affect immune cells ability of eliminate immune complexes, contributing to its accumulation, enhancing organ damage, increasing the flares and recurrence of symptoms.

1.3.2. FcγRIIIb

FcγRIIIb is the unique receptor in the FcγR family which is anchored to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane by a GPI moiety whose surface expression is 10-fold higher than that of FcγRIIa (135,000 versus 10,000 receptors/cell, respectively)[92]. Because of this difference in anchoring FcγRIIIb to the membrane, it does not have intracellular signaling motifs.
Functions: FcγRIIIb cooperates with other FcγRs to promote phagocytosis of antibody-opsonized microbes by favoring Ca influx[92]. Additionally, FcγRIIIb induces a neutrophil extracellular trap-producing phenotype in the absence of activation of FcγRIIa[36].
Single nucleotide variants: There are three known alleles: FCGR3B*01 (NA1, which means Neutrophil Antigen 1), FCGR3B*02 (NA2), and FCGR3B*03 (SH). Alleles FCGR3B*01 and FCGR3B*02 differ by five nucleotides at positions 141, 147, 227, 277 and 349 of exon 3, and FCGR3B*03 differs from FCGR3B*02 by only one nucleotide at position 266 of exon 3. The allele polymorphism of FcγRIIIb appears to modify neutrophil phagocytosis[93]. Figure 2
Role in SLE: The literature displays conflicting results regarding the association between SLE susceptibility and FcγRIIIb polymorphisms, even in studies with the same genetic background. This may be because some typing techniques, such as PCR, may not discriminate between the *01 and *02 alleles. However, sequencing studies have associated SLE with FCGR3B*01 allele, as well as with the FCGR3B*01/*01 and FCGR3B*01/*02 genotypes[93]. On the contrary, other study associates FCGR3B*02 homozygotes for the development of SLE. Additionally, a specific lupus phenotype, lupus nephritis is more likely to appear in individuals with the genotype FCGR3B*02/*02[94].

3. Ligand Binding

The suspicion that there were different types of Fcγ receptors and different affinities in ligand binding was taken into account in 1970, when were supported differences in the response performed by polymorphonuclear lymphocytes and monocytes to the same immune IgG complex, which was confirmed later in 1982[95,96,97]. Currently, the affinity of FcγRs varies according to the type of IgG, and studies of variants of these receptors have also reported changes in binding affinity. Table 1.
It is well known that the FcγR binds to the Fc fraction of the IgG. However, it has recently been determined that certain pentraxins, such as C-reactive protein and Serum Amyloid P (SAP) can activate FcγRI and FcγRIIa, favoring phagocytosis activation pathways. Additionally, the most recently described ligand, cytokine fibrinogen-like 2 (Fgl2), can bind to FcγRIIb and induce the caspase-3/7-mediated apoptosis subset of CD8+ T cells[28,31,39,109].
FcγR-IC binding. The elements that regulate the binding of FcγR and IgG immune complexes are the second domain of the FcγR and IgG subtypes [110]. However, differences in the FcγR family have been conclusively demonstrated. The high degree of amino acid conservation in the extracellular domains of FcγR and the constant sequence of the IgG Fc fraction has allowed modeling of the mechanism of FcγR-ligand (an immune complex of IgG) binding[111]. The contact interface includes various amino acids in the second domain of FcγR, which interact with the Fc fraction of IgG, namely Cγ2. FcγR-lC binding has been exemplified by a three-dimensional structural model of human IgG1 binding to soluble FcγRIII, in which the extracellular portion of FcγRIII asymmetrically binds one IgG molecule. This 1:1 stoichiometry binding model explains why IgG molecules cannot trigger FcγR-mediated cellular responses spontaneously in the absence of cross-linking by multivalent antigens[112]. This model avoids permanent stimulation of the immune system by monomeric immunoglobulins present at high concentrations in serum [32].
However, despite the low variability in the contact site of FcγR with IgG Immune complexes, there are consistent differences in binding affinity. The hinge peptide is the other central recognition site, and variation in this region is likely to be the main reason for the differing affinities. The importance of the lower hinge in binding has been demonstrated by introducing mutations that abrogate the binding of recombinant soluble FcγRIIa to human IgG1[113]. Additionally, FcγRII and FcγRIII are 50% identical, and these differences affect the loops in contact with the hinge, but not the contact regions of Cγ2-A and Cγ2-B. Other examples include single-nucleotide variants at the hinge level. For instance, the FcγRIIa Arginine131 variant affects the binding affinity. A reasonable explanation may be steric clashes between the larger side chain of Arginine131 in the receptor and Proline238 of the hinge peptide with associated structural rearrangements [32].
However, the significantly higher affinity of FcγRI is thought to be mediated by its third domain, because the two N-terminal domains show an affinity for IgG comparable to that of FcγRII and FcγRIII. Nevertheless, the hinge variation of glutamic acid (E235) instead of leucine (L235) increases the affinity of mIgG2b by more than 100-fold, which underlines the central importance of this residue for FcγRI binding. Modeling indicated that Leu235 of both Cγ2 chains may be bound to an extended hydrophobic patch in FcγRI formed by Trp132 and Tyr116. However, the role of the additional FcγRI domain in enhanced IgG binding has not been completely elucidated. It can contribute to the affinity by stabilizing the open receptor conformation or by directly binding to the Fc fragment [32].
Regarding the importance of FcγR affinity, early research has shown that the same ligand triggers different responses in different cell types. Single Nucleotide Variants in the binding site have been found to be associated with a variety of autoimmune diseases. Additionally, receptor binding is critical for antibody-based immunotherapy[110]. The binding quality of the IgG Fc fraction to FcγR is important because the interactions of therapeutic antibodies may be affected by various normal stresses, a consequence of their administration in vivo. This type of analysis aims to be turned into a quality test to deliver an antibody with an effective affinity in in vivo scenarios [114].
FcγR–pentraxin binding. Similar to FcγR-IC binding, the binding of pentraxins follows a 1:1 stoichiometry between SAP and FcγRIIa, which implies that multivalent pathogen binding is required for receptor aggregation [115].

3.1. Immunological Functions of FcγRs

FcγRs family is involved in regulating and executing antibody-mediated responses, including phagocytosis, antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, enhancing of antigen presentation, and release of cytokines and mediators of inflammation. This diversity of functional outcomes links the specificity of the adaptive immune system to the powerful effector functions elicited by innate immune cells.
Most cells of the immune system express receptors for the constant Fc region of immunoglobulin G (IgG), which recognizes immune complexes and IgG-opsonized cells. However, it took around a decade to demonstrate the cell types that express these receptors: Macrophages [7,8,14,43], Monocytes, [9,11] PMN [16,96], NK cells [116], B cells [12,13,15], plasma cells, basophils [19,101] and platelets [117]. T cells have been controversial; however, recently, FcγRIIb was identified in a subset of CD8+T cells[118]. Table 2.. The functional outcome resulting from the binding of immune complexes to these receptors depends on FcγR expressed in the cell. The activating receptors have functions such as phagocytosis[43], antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity[119,120], NETosis[36], enhancing of antigen presentation[121], oxidative burst[122], and release of chemoattractants. The FcγRIIb modulates cell activation, shapes the B-cell repertoire, and induces apoptosis in autoreactive plasma cells [70].

3.2. Phagocytosis

This process is an efficient and clean immunological host defence mechanism. Through phagocytosis, antigens immobilized with IgG antibodies are internalized and cleared. Early research on these receptors revealed their ability to induce phagocytosis through FcγRI and FcγRII in monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils. Neutrophils constitutively express a unique combination of FcγRs: FcγRIIa and FcγRIIIb[123]. Both have a synergistic function, but FcγRIIIb alone does not generate a strong phagocytic signal [43]. However, it is known that the crosslinking of FcγRIIIb with FcγRIIa enhances phagocytosis because FcγRIIIb favors calcium influx to enhance FcγRIIa signaling [92]. The synergistic roles of both the receptors were corroborated. Recent publications have reported decreased phagocytic activity in neutrophils from FcγRIIIb-deficient donors[124]. Additionally, neutrophil FcγRIIIb crosslinking induces lipid raft-mediated activation of SHP-2, affects cytokine expression, and retards neutrophil apoptosis [125].

3.3. Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity

ADCC allows processing of IgG-opsonized cells through FcγR. The high-affinity receptor FcγRI is only present on activated neutrophils, but generally does not contribute to the ADCC of solid cancer cells, even when expressed. In contrast, FcγRIIa on neutrophils mediates the ADCC of solid cancer cells; however, FcγRIIIb restricts the antibody-dependent destruction of cancer cells. For instance, treatment with trastuzumab results in better ADCC after FcγRIIIb blockade[126]. FcγRIIIa in NK cells, macrophages, and monocytes exerts an effective ADCC, and its variants affect the monoclonal antibody activity[127].

3.4. NETosis

The role of FcγRs in the formation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) has recently been reported. It was concluded that FcγRIIa could efficiently promote phagocytosis but could not induce NETs formation on its own. In contrast, FcγRIIIb poorly promotes phagocytosis, but it can efficiently induce the formation of NETs. Note that this was concluded by testing the function of each receptor, blocking the other one. However, neutrophils express both. This information could be relevant when FcγRIIa affinity decrease, and FcγRIIIb stimulation is more intense, resulting in the possibility of neutrophils with aberrant activity with a NETosis-generating phenotype[36,128].
NETs are a potent mechanism of defense during infections, but they are harmful in autoimmunity, NETs accelerate the inflammatory processes by releasing a wide range of active molecules like danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), histones, as well as active lytic enzymes (myeloperoxidase and thymidine phosphorylase) in extracellular space, leading to further immune responses[129]. Therefore, NETs may also serve as a potential source of autoantigens (nuclear proteins in SLE) against which autoantibodies associated with SLE are directed.

4. FcγR Signalling Pathways

4.1. Activating Signaling Pathway

The activating signaling pathway is partially described as the MEK/ERK pathway. It should be highlighted that FcγRIIIb signaling follows the same pathway, but with important variants since ERK phosphorylation occurs in the nucleus when it commonly occurs in the cytosol. This differentiation allows FcγRIIIb to change the phagocytic phenotype of neutrophils to another producer of extracellular traps (in the absence of FcγRIIa activity), a distinct neutrophil phenotype recently described[36] Figure 2. In the context of SLE, it is important to know the triggers, receptors, and signaling pathways that lead neutrophils to form extracellular traps that contain proteins and enzymes that damage the tissue, promoting inflammation. More important these traps DNA and carry nuclear and intracellular proteins (small nuclear ribonucleoproteins)[130,131] that are recognized as autoantigens and induce the formation of autoantibodies. Following the immunological mechanism, these autoantibodies form immune complexes that bind to FcγRIIIb receptors, thereby inducing NETosis in a positive feedback loop.

4.2. Inhibitory Signaling Pathway

The cytoplasmic domain of FcγRIIb contains an ITIM that recruits the inhibitory phosphatase SHIP[29], which functions to inhibit phosphorylation of signaling molecules important in the activation, including Btk and PLCg, that disrupt calcium flux through hydrolysis of PIP3[132]. In innate immune cells, this function of FcγRIIb directly antagonizes the activation of Fcγ receptors; thus, the balance of activating and inhibitory signals dictates the outcome of the cellular response, such as co-signaling molecules. On B cells, FcγRIIb is the sole Fcγ receptor; thus, instead of modulating the signaling of activating FcγR, FcγRIIb mediated SHIP recruitment functions primarily to attenuate B cell receptor (BCR) signaling [29].
Figure 3. FcγRIIIb signalling pathway (NETosis pathway) (Red lines & arrows): due to the lack of ITAMs the initial steps of signaling are not yet known in detail, however, part of the signaling pathway associated with the formation of NETs has been recently described. The signalling in neutrophils of SLE patients might starts from the immune complexes of autoantibodies (The figure represents autoantibodies complexes with autoantigens like doble stranded DNA or nuclear proteins, which is common in SLE) binding to the receptor. Currently, what it is known about the pathway has been obtained from in vitro tests. Upon FcγRIIIb IC binding or receptor activation, the Syk and TAK 1 kinases are activated. These enzymes trigger the MEK/ERK signaling cascade. ERK signaling leads to activation of the NADPH oxidase complex for ROS production, which is required to induce NET formation. PKC is involved in the MEK/ERK pathway activation. Also, the nuclear factor Elk-1 gets phosphorylated in the nucleus by a mechanism independent of ERK. The FcγRIIIb activation promotes pro-adhesive phenotype and enhances Neutrophil Extracellular traps; the contribution to phagocytosis is minimal and phosphorylation of ERK is much more efficient in the nucleus. It favors the expression of beta 2 integrins.
Figure 3. FcγRIIIb signalling pathway (NETosis pathway) (Red lines & arrows): due to the lack of ITAMs the initial steps of signaling are not yet known in detail, however, part of the signaling pathway associated with the formation of NETs has been recently described. The signalling in neutrophils of SLE patients might starts from the immune complexes of autoantibodies (The figure represents autoantibodies complexes with autoantigens like doble stranded DNA or nuclear proteins, which is common in SLE) binding to the receptor. Currently, what it is known about the pathway has been obtained from in vitro tests. Upon FcγRIIIb IC binding or receptor activation, the Syk and TAK 1 kinases are activated. These enzymes trigger the MEK/ERK signaling cascade. ERK signaling leads to activation of the NADPH oxidase complex for ROS production, which is required to induce NET formation. PKC is involved in the MEK/ERK pathway activation. Also, the nuclear factor Elk-1 gets phosphorylated in the nucleus by a mechanism independent of ERK. The FcγRIIIb activation promotes pro-adhesive phenotype and enhances Neutrophil Extracellular traps; the contribution to phagocytosis is minimal and phosphorylation of ERK is much more efficient in the nucleus. It favors the expression of beta 2 integrins.
Preprints 143180 g003
FcγRIIa signalling pathway (Phagocytosis pathway) (Blue lines & arrows): Upon the binding of FcγRIIa and the immune complexes, Src family tyrosine kinases get activated and phosphorylate tyrosine residues in the ITAM. Then, Syk is activated by Src, Syk phosphorylates multiple substrates, such as Sos, which activates the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK (MAPK) pathway. Ras activates Raf, and then Raf phosphorylates MEK, which in turn phosphorylates ERK. ERK can also lead to activation of nuclear factors, including NF-κB. Syk can also induce activation of PI3 K, which produces PIP3 and then PIP3 binds to BTK, which activates small GTPases as Rho and Rac. These GTPases are involved in cytoskeleton remodeling for phagocytosis. PIP3 also activates PLCγ, which produces DAG and IP3. DAG activates PKC. PKC leads to activation of the NADPH-oxidase complex, for production of ROS. IP3 binds to the IP3 receptor on endoplasmic reticulum. IP3R also functions as a nonselective Ca2+ channel that allows release of Ca2+ into the cytoplasm. Activation of FcγRIIa promotes a phagocytic Phenotype that favors phagocytosis, phosphorylation of ERK in the cytosol, oxidative Stress, and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity.
Abbreviations or molecule’s function: A question mark (?) indicates an unknown mechanism of activation. Syk: spleen tyrosine kinase, TAK 1: TGF-beta activated kinase 1, MEK: mitogen activated protein kinase kinase, ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase, PKC: Protein kinase C, Sos: Son of sevenless (a guanine nucleotide exchange factor), Ras: is a GTPase, Raf: is a serine/threonine kinase, Elk-1: is a transcription factor. BTK: Bruton’s tyrosine kinase. DAG: diacylglycerol, NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B. PI3 K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase, PLCγ: Phospholipase C gamma, IP3: Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Adaptation of figures and mechanism[36,128,133]

5. Roles in Non-Immune Cells

Platelets
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug effect induced by IgG antibodies directed to complexes consisting of the positively charged chemokine Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) and the negatively charged anticoagulant heparin[134]. The resulting ICs activate platelets via FcγRIIa, which leads to thrombocytopenia and thrombotic disorders. The involvement of FcγRIIa in the pathology of HIT has been reviewed extensively[123]. Accordingly, the platelet expression of FcγRIIa is a marker of increased platelet reactivity that can be reliably and repeatedly measured[135]. Neutrophil activation and NETosis are the significant drivers of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [136]

6. Functions in Disease

FcγR variants and copy number variation (CNV) have been associated with autoimmune diseases; this includes systemic and organ-specific diseases. Genetic and Genome-Wide Association studies have identified the participation of FcγR in the physiopathology of a wide variety of autoimmune diseases such as systemic Lupus Erythematosus[69,137], Rheumatoid Arthritis[138,139,140]; Celiac Disease[139,141]. Metabolic, inflammatory diseases such as cardiovascular disease[142], and Diabetes Mellitus[139]. Additionally, the polymorphism of FcgR determines the response to treatments in cancer diseases[143].

7. Therapeutic Approaches

Various therapeutic approaches related to FcγRs and their effector mechanisms have been developed. Some have been tested in animal models, and others have resulted in therapeutic options already allowed and successfully used.

7.1. FcγRs in the Mechanism of Action of Monoclonal Antibodies (mAb)

Currently, Anti-CD20 antibody immunotherapy is the most useful and representative example of a monoclonal antibody that has been extensively and exhaustively characterized. Anti-CD20 were the first mAbs to treat effectively non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and a wide spectrum of autoimmune diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[144], Myasthenia Gravis[145], Neuromyelitis Optica[146,147], Multiple sclerosis[148,149] and Pemphigus[150]. Now it is known that B cell depletion uses both FcγRI and FcγRIII-dependent pathways, and it is mediated mainly by monocytes during the anti-CD20 immunotherapy[33]. Studies in animal models and patients undergoing treatment have demonstrated that engagement of FcγRs on innate cell populations is crucial for rituximab to mediate its antitumor cytotoxic effects[151].
Also, trastuzumab (Herceptin®) and rituximab (Rituxan®) engaged both activation (FcγRIII) and inhibitory (FcγRIIb) antibody receptors on myeloid cells, thus modulating their cytotoxic potential[152].

7.2. Organ Transplantation

Recently has been reported that the inhibitory activity of FcγRIIb in a CD8+ T cell subset has a role in allograft rejection and tumor immunity. CD8+ T cell-intrinsic genetic deletion of FcγRIIb increased CD8+ effector T cell accumulation, resulting in accelerated graft rejection and decreased tumor volume now in mouse models. The immunosuppressive cytokine fibrinogen-like 2 (Fgl2) was a functional ligand for FcγRIIb on CD8+ T cells. Fgl2 induced caspase-3/7-mediated apoptosis via FcγRIIb. Increased expression of FcγRIIb correlated with freedom from rejection following withdrawal from immunosuppression in a clinical trial of kidney transplant recipients [39].

7.3. Recombinant Soluble Human FcγRs

The binding of Ag-Ab immune complexes to cellular promotes cell activation, release of inflammatory mediators, and tissue destruction which is characteristic of autoimmune disease. It had been shown that recombinant human-FcγRI II and III reduce immune complex precipitation, block complement-mediated lysis of Ab-sensitized red blood cells and inhibit immune complex-mediated production of IL-6, IL-13, MCP-1, and TNF-a by cultured mast cells. Additionally, local or systemic delivery of recombinant human FcγRIa reduces edema and neutrophil infiltration in the cutaneous Arthus reaction, lower serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, and prevents paw swelling and joint damage of collagen Ab-induced arthritis in mice models. These data demonstrate that recombinant human-FcγRIa is an effective inhibitor of type III hypersensitivity[153].

7.4. Antibody Therapeutics: Enhancing of Inhibitory Function & Blocking The Activating Function.

Early attempts to test intravenous Immunoglobulin were made in the '80s. Although the specific action mechanisms of Immunoglobulin were unknown, it achieved satisfactory clinical results[154]. Engaging inhibitory FcγRIIb by Fc region has been considered an attractive approach for improving the efficacy of antibody therapeutics. Therefore, the selective enhancement of FcγRIIb binding achieved by engineering Fc variants has provided an alternative way for improving the efficacy of antibody therapeutics[155]. The inhibition of FcγR-mediated cellular activation has been proposed as a reasonable approach to block pro-inflammatory mechanisms and tissue damage immune-mediated in autoimmune diseases.
On the other hand targeting FcγRIIIa (an activating receptor) with an antibody was the first specific approach of a promising therapeutic approach for an autoimmune disease[156], and following this development, several specific antibodies targeting the activating FcγRs have been developed and subjected to preclinical and clinical testing processes. Various strategies have been attempted, including the specific blocking of the main trigger receptors. However, the somewhat similarity in the sequence of the FcγR binding domains, which are an immune physiological advantage that allows the amplification of the effector functions performed by these receptors, becomes a disadvantage for the design of specific inhibitors[157]. Currently, it has been developed blockers for FcγRI, FcγRII, and FcγRIII[157].

7.5. Antibody Therapeutics: Sialylation of Fc IgG to Generate Anti-Inflammatory Responses

On the other hand, more structural research has been added to improve and promote Fc-FcγR anti-inflammatory interactions. Generally, Fc-FcγR interactions generate pro-inflammatory effects of immune complexes and cytotoxic antibodies. In contrast, therapeutic intravenous gamma globulin and its Fc fragments are anti-inflammatory. It has been shown that these distinct properties of the IgG-Fc result from differential sialylation of the Fc core polysaccharide. IgG acquires anti-inflammatory properties upon Fc sialylation, which is reduced upon the induction of an antigen-specific immune response. This differential sialylation may provide a switch from innate anti-inflammatory activity in the steady state to generating adaptive pro-inflammatory effects upon antigenic challenge[158].

7.6. Antibody Therapeutics: Vaccines & Potentiation of Immune Response

Vaccination strategies have been performed to elicit broad and potent immune responses based on the immunomodulatory properties of Fc-FcγR interactions[37] .For instance, potentiation of natural killer cells to overcome cancer resistance to NK cell-based therapy and to enhance antibody-based immunotherapy. One strategy is the combination of monoclonal antibodies that mediate ADCC and engineered NK cells with potentiated anti-cancer activity. The advantage of using mAbs with ADCC activity is that they can activate NK cells, but also favor the accumulation of immune effector cells to the tumor microenvironment. [159].

8. Conclusions

Thus far, we have provided the most general information on Fc gamma receptors. More information will be added as a result of new research in the coming years, especially those related to the improvement of the response to monoclonal antibodies, which is closely related to the binding of these antibodies to activating Fcgamma receptors. Additionally, we will learn in more depth how FcγRs contribute to the response due to altered intestinal permeability and the consequent translocation of microbial molecules from the intestine to the blood, which increases the probability of autoimmunity and in which scenario Fc gamma receptors mediate or modulate immune cell responses.
However, this review aimed to provide information that generates a general overview that researchers starting out in this line of research should initially know. Finally, the study of Fc gamma receptors will continue to hold more surprise. Although Fc gamma receptors are not as polymorphic as HLA, an additional advance would be to generate a database where the variants found can be added and a systematized way of naming the new alleles, especially for alleles in which single nucleotide polymorphisms have been considered to constitute haplotypes, as is the case for the FcγRIIIb receptor.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Susana Hernández-Doño & Jesús Sepúlveda-Delgado; visualization, Susana Hernández-Doño; writing, Susana Hernández-Doño & Jesús Sepúlveda-Delgado; draft preparation, Susana Hernández-Doño & Luis Guillermo Llorente-Peters. All authors critically revised, discussed, and edited the article until it reached its current form. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Figure 1 and Figure 3 images were created using pictures from Servier Medical Art, by Servier (http://smart.servier.com).

References

  1. Grundy, H.O. , et al., The polymorphic Fc gamma receptor II gene maps to human chromosome 1q. Immunogenetics 1989, 29, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dietzsch, E. , et al. , The human FCG1 gene encoding the high-affinity Fc gamma RI maps to chromosome 1q21. Immunogenetics 1993, 38, 307–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Takai, S. , et al., Human high-affinity Fc gamma RI (CD64) gene mapped to chromosome 1q21.2-q21.3 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 1994, 93, 13–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. A Peltz, G.; O Grundy, H.; Lebo, R.V.; Yssel, H.; Barsh, G.S.; Moore, K.W. Human Fc gamma RIII: cloning, expression, and identification of the chromosomal locus of two Fc receptors for IgG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1989, 86, 1013–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. de Wit, T.P. , et al., Assignment of three human high-affinity Fc gamma receptor I genes to chromosome 1, band q21.1. Immunogenetics 1993, 38, 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fleit, H.B.; Wright, S.D.; Durie, C.J.; E Valinsky, J.; Unkeless, J.C. Ontogeny of Fc receptors and complement receptor (CR3) during human myeloid differentiation. J. Clin. Investig. 1984, 73, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Archer, G.T. Phagocytosis by human monocytes in red cells coated with Rh antibodies. Vox Sang 1965, 10, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Berken, A.; Benacerraf, B. PROPERTIES OF ANTIBODIES CYTOPHILIC FOR MACROPHAGES. J. Exp. Med. 1966, 123, 119–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. LoBuglio, A.F.; Cotran, R.S.; Jandl, J.H. Red Cells Coated with Immunoglobulin G: Binding and Sphering by Mononuclear Cells in Man. Science 1967, 158, 1582–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quie, P.G.; Messner, R.P.; Williams, R.C. PHAGOCYTOSIS IN SUBACUTE BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS. J. Exp. Med. 1968, 128, 553–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huber, H.; Fudenberg, H. Receptor Sites of Human Monocytes for IgG. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1968, 34, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Basten, A. , et al., A receptor for antibody on B lymphocytes. I. Method of detection and functional significance. J Exp Med 1972, 135, 610–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Basten, A. N.L. Warner, and T. Mandel, A receptor for antibody on B lymphocytes. II. Immunochemical and electron microscopy characteristics. J Exp Med 1972, 135, 627–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hess, M.; Lüscher, E. Macrophage receptors for IgG aggregates. Exp. Cell Res. 1970, 59, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dickler, H.B.; Kunkel, H.G. Interaction of aggregated -globulin with B lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1972, 136, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mantovani, B. Different Roles of IgG and Complement Receptors in Phagocytosis by Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes. J. Immunol. 1975, 115, 15–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yasmeen, D.; Ellerson, J.R.; Dorrington, K.J.; Painter, R.H. The structure and function of immunoglobulin domains. IV. The distribution of some effector functions among the Cgamma2 and Cgamma3 homology regions of human immunoglobulin G1. J Immunol 1976, 116, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kaplan, G. Differences in the Mode of Phagocytosis with Fc and C3 Receptors in Macrophages. Scand. J. Immunol. 1977, 6, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ishizaka, T.; Sterk, A.; Ishizaka, K. Demonstration of Fcgamma receptors on human basophil granulocytes. J Immunol. 1979, 123, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fridman, W.H.; Gresser, I.; Bandu, M.T.; Aguet, M.; Neauport-Sautes, C. Interferon enhances the expression of Fc gamma receptors. J. Immunol. 1980, 124, 2436–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fleit, H.B.; Wright, S.D.; Unkeless, J.C. Human neutrophil Fc gamma receptor distribution and structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1982, 79, 3275–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hough, D.W., A. Narendran, and N.D. Hall, Heterogeneity of Fc gamma receptor expression on human cell lines. Immunol Lett 1983, 7, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stengelin, S.; Stamenkovic, I.; Seed, B. Isolation of cDNAs for two distinct human Fc receptors by ligand affinity cloning. EMBO J. 1988, 7, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lanier, L.L.; Ruitenberg, J.J.; Phillips, J.H. Functional and biochemical analysis of CD16 antigen on natural killer cells and granulocytes. J. Immunol. 1988, 141, 3478–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Edberg, J.C.; Redecha, P.B.; E Salmon, J.; Kimberly, R.P. Human Fc gamma RIII (CD16). Isoforms with distinct allelic expression, extracellular domains, and membrane linkages on polymorphonuclear and natural killer cells. J. Immunol. 1989, 143, 1642–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Scallon, B.J.; Scigliano, E.; Freedman, V.H.; Miedel, M.C.; Pan, Y.C.; Unkeless, J.C.; Kochan, J.P. A human immunoglobulin G receptor exists in both polypeptide-anchored and phosphatidylinositol-glycan-anchored forms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 5079–5083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brooks, D.G.; Qiu, W.Q.; Luster, A.D.; Ravetch, J.V. Structure and expression of human IgG FcRII(CD32). Functional heterogeneity is encoded by the alternatively spliced products of multiple genes. J. Exp. Med. 1989, 170, 1369–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marnell, L.L.; Mold, C.; A Volzer, M.; Burlingame, R.W.; Du Clos, T.W. C-reactive protein binds to Fc gamma RI in transfected COS cells. J. Immunol. 1995, 155, 2185–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ono, M. , et al., Role of the inositol phosphatase SHIP in negative regulation of the immune system by the receptor Fc(gamma)RIIB. Nature 1996, 383, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hulett, M.D. and P.M. Hogarth, The second and third extracellular domains of FcgammaRI (CD64) confer the unique high affinity binding of IgG2a. Mol Immunol 1998, 35, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bharadwaj, D. , et al., The major receptor for C-reactive protein on leukocytes is fcgamma receptor II. J Exp Med 1999, 190, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sondermann, P. , et al., The 3.2-A crystal structure of the human IgG1 Fc fragment-Fc gammaRIII complex. Nature 2000, 406, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Uchida, J.; Hamaguchi, Y.; Oliver, J.A.; Ravetch, J.V.; Poe, J.C.; Haas, K.M.; Tedder, T.F. The Innate Mononuclear Phagocyte Network Depletes B Lymphocytes through Fc Receptor–dependent Mechanisms during Anti-CD20 Antibody Immunotherapy. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 199, 1659–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, H. , et al., The FGL2-FcgammaRIIB pathway: a novel mechanism leading to immunosuppression. Eur J Immunol 2008, 38, 3114–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Seeling, M.; Hillenhoff, U.; David, J.P.; Schett, G.; Tuckermann, J.; Lux, A.; Nimmerjahn, F. Inflammatory monocytes and Fcγ receptor IV on osteoclasts are critical for bone destruction during inflammatory arthritis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10729–10734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alemán, O.R.; Mora, N.; Cortes-Vieyra, R.; Uribe-Querol, E.; Rosales, C. Differential Use of Human Neutrophil FcγReceptors for Inducing Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 2016, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bournazos, S.; Ravetch, J.V. Fcγ Receptor Function and the Design of Vaccination Strategies. Immunity 2017, 47, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Castro-Dopico, T.; Dennison, T.; Ferdinand, J.; Mathews, R.; Fleming, A.; Clift, D.; Stewart, B.J.; Jing, C.; Strongili, K.; I Labzin, L.; et al. Anti-commensal IgG Drives Intestinal Inflammation and Type 17 Immunity in Ulcerative Colitis. Immunity 2019, 50, 1099–1114.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morris, A.B.; Farley, C.R.; Ford, M.L.; Pinelli, D.F.; Adams, L.E.; Cragg, M.S.; Boss, J.M.; Scharer, C.D.; Fribourg, M.; Cravedi, P.; et al. Signaling through the Inhibitory Fc Receptor FcγRIIB Induces CD8+ T Cell Apoptosis to Limit T Cell Immunity. Immunity 2020, 52, 136–150.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Junqueira, C. , et al., FcγR-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection of monocytes activates inflammation. Nature 2022, 606, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Osorio, J.C. , et al., The antitumor activities of anti-CD47 antibodies require Fc-FcγR interactions. Cancer Cell 2023, 41, 2051–2065.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Knorr, D.A.; Blanchard, L.; Leidner, R.S.; Jensen, S.M.; Meng, R.; Jones, A.; Ballesteros-Merino, C.; Bell, R.B.; Baez, M.; Marino, A.; et al. FcγRIIB Is an Immune Checkpoint Limiting the Activity of Treg-Targeting Antibodies in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2023, 12, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anderson, C.L.; Shen, L.; Eicher, D.M.; Wewers, M.D.; Gill, J.K. Phagocytosis mediated by three distinct Fc gamma receptor classes on human leukocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 171, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. van Vugt, M.; Heijnen, I.; Capel, P.; Park, S.; Ra, C.; Saito, T.; Verbeek, J.; van de Winkel, J. FcR gamma-chain is essential for both surface expression and function of human Fc gamma RI (CD64) in vivo. Blood 1996, 87, 3593–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gillooly, D.J. and J.M. Allen, The human high affinity IgG receptor (Fc gamma RI) signals through the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) of the gamma chain of Fc epsilon RI. Biochem Soc Trans 1997, 25, 215s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tridandapani, S.; Siefker, K.; Carter, J.E.; Wewers, M.D.; Anderson, C.L.; Teillaud, J.-L. Regulated Expression and Inhibitory Function of FcγRIIb in Human Monocytic Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 5082–5089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Green, J.M. A.D. Schreiber, and E.J. Brown, Role for a glycan phosphoinositol anchor in Fc gamma receptor synergy. J Cell Biol 1997, 139, 1209–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lu, J.; Chu, J.; Zou, Z.; Hamacher, N.B.; Rixon, M.W.; Sun, P.D. Structure of FcγRI in complex with Fc reveals the importance of glycan recognition for high-affinity IgG binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nimmerjahn, F. and J.V. Ravetch, Fcgamma receptors: old friends and new family members. Immunity 2006, 24, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hulett, M.D. and P.M. Hogarth, Molecular basis of Fc receptor function. Adv Immunol 1994, 57, 1–127. [Google Scholar]
  51. Allen, J.M.; Seed, B. Isolation and Expression of Functional High-Affinity Fc Receptor Complementary DNAs. Science 1989, 243, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Stuart, S.G.; Trounstine, M.L.; Vaux, D.J.; Koch, T.; Martens, C.L.; Mellman, I.; Moore, K.W. Isolation and expression of cDNA clones encoding a human receptor for IgG (Fc gamma RII). J. Exp. Med. 1987, 166, 1668–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ravetch, J.V.; Perussia, B. Alternative membrane forms of Fc gamma RIII(CD16) on human natural killer cells and neutrophils. Cell type-specific expression of two genes that differ in single nucleotide substitutions. . J. Exp. Med. 1989, 170, 481–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Perussia, B. and J.V. Ravetch, Fc gamma RIII (CD16) on human macrophages is a functional product of the Fc gamma RIII-2 gene. Eur J Immunol 1991, 21, 425–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. A Peltz, G.; Trounstine, M.L.; Moore, K.W. Cloned and expressed human Fc receptor for IgG mediates anti-CD3-dependent lymphoproliferation. J. Immunol. 1988, 141, 1891–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Quilliam, A.L.; Osman, N.; McKenzie, I.F.; Hogarth, P.M. Biochemical characterization of murine Fc gamma RI. Immunology 1993, 78, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Hulett, M.D.; Osman, N.; McKenzie, I.F.; Hogarth, P.M. Chimeric Fc receptors identify functional domains of the murine high affinity receptor for IgG. J. Immunol. 1991, 147, 1863–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lu, J.; Ellsworth, J.L.; Hamacher, N.; Oak, S.W.; Sun, P.D. Crystal Structure of Fcγ Receptor I and Its Implication in High Affinity γ-Immunoglobulin Binding. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 40608–40613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, X.; Yuan, L.; Tan, Z.; Wu, H.; Chen, F.; Huang, J.; Wang, P.; Hambly, B.D.; Bao, S.; Tao, K. CD64 plays a key role in diabetic wound healing. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1322256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Lee, P.Y.; Kellner, E.S.; Paulus, M.; Switanek, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhuang, H.; Sobel, E.S.; Segal, M.S.; Satoh, M.; et al. Monocyte surface expression of Fcγ receptor RI (CD64), a biomarker reflecting type-I interferon levels in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2010, 12, R90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, Y. , et al., Increased expression of FcgammaRI/CD64 on circulating monocytes parallels ongoing inflammation and nephritis in lupus. Arthritis Res Ther 2009, 11, p R6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huot, S. , et al., IgG-aggregates rapidly upregulate FcgRI expression at the surface of human neutrophils in a FcgRII-dependent fashion: A crucial role for FcgRI in the generation of reactive oxygen species. Faseb j 2020, 34, 15208–15221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bewarder, N. , et al., In vivo and in vitro specificity of protein tyrosine kinases for immunoglobulin G receptor (FcgammaRII) phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16, 4735–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ramsland, P.A. , et al., Structural basis for Fc gammaRIIa recognition of human IgG and formation of inflammatory signaling complexes. J Immunol 2011, 187, 3208–3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. E Salmon, J.; Edberg, J.C.; Brogle, N.L.; Kimberly, R.P. Allelic polymorphisms of human Fc gamma receptor IIA and Fc gamma receptor IIIB. Independent mechanisms for differences in human phagocyte function. . J. Clin. Investig. 1992, 89, 1274–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Deng, Y.; Tsao, B.P. Genetic susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus in the genomic era. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010, 6, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Catarino, J.d.S.; de Oliveira, R.F.; Silva, M.V.; Sales-Campos, H.; de Vito, F.B.; da Silva, D.A.A.; Naves, L.L.; Oliveira, C.J.F.; Rodrigues, D.B.R.; Rodrigues, V. Genetic variation of FcγRIIa induces higher uptake of Leishmania infantum and modulates cytokine production by adherent mononuclear cells in vitro. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1343602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shashidharamurthy, R. et al., Dynamics of the Interaction of Human IgG Subtype Immune Complexes with Cells Expressing R and H Allelic Forms of a Low-Affinity Fc Receptor CD32A. J Immunol 2009, 183, 8216–8224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bonegio, R.G. , et al., Lupus-Associated Immune Complexes Activate Human Neutrophils in an FcγRIIA-Dependent but TLR-Independent Response. The Journal of Immunology 2019, 202, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nimmerjahn, F.; Ravetch, J.V. Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2008, 8, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Daëron, M. , et al., The same tyrosine-based inhibition motif, in the intracytoplasmic domain of Fc gamma RIIB, regulates negatively BCR-, TCR-, and FcR-dependent cell activation. Immunity 1995, 3, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tzeng, S.-J.; Li, W.-Y.; Wang, H.-Y. FcγRIIB mediates antigen-independent inhibition on human B lymphocytes through Btk and p38 MAPK. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015, 22, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, X. , et al., A novel polymorphism in the Fcgamma receptor IIB (CD32B) transmembrane region alters receptor signaling. Arthritis Rheum 2003, 48, 3242–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kyogoku, C. , et al., Fcgamma receptor gene polymorphisms in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: contribution of FCGR2B to genetic susceptibility. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46, 1242–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Floto, R.A. , et al., Loss of function of a lupus-associated FcgammaRIIb polymorphism through exclusion from lipid rafts. Nat Med 2005, 11, 1056–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kono, H. , et al., FcgammaRIIB Ile232Thr transmembrane polymorphism associated with human systemic lupus erythematosus decreases affinity to lipid rafts and attenuates inhibitory effects on B cell receptor signaling. Hum Mol Genet 2005, 14, 2881–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Su, K. , et al., A promoter haplotype of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-bearing FcgammaRIIb alters receptor expression and associates with autoimmunity. I. Regulatory FCGR2B polymorphisms and their association with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol 2004, 172, 7186–7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Su, K. , et al., A promoter haplotype of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-bearing FcgammaRIIb alters receptor expression and associates with autoimmunity. II. Differential binding of GATA4 and Yin-Yang1 transcription factors and correlated receptor expression and function. J Immunol 2004, 172, 7192–7199. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Su, K. , et al., A Promoter Haplotype of the Immunoreceptor Tyrosine-Based Inhibitory Motif-Bearing FcγRIIb Alters Receptor Expression and Associates with Autoimmunity. I. Regulatory FCGR2B Polymorphisms and Their Association with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. The Journal of Immunology 2004, 172, 7186–7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tsang-A-Sjoe, M.W.P.; Nagelkerke, S.Q.; Bultink, I.E.M.; Geissler, J.; Tanck, M.W.T.; Tacke, C.E.; Ellis, J.A.; Zenz, W.; Bijl, M.; Berden, J.H.; et al. Fc-gamma receptor polymorphisms differentially influence susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Rheumatology 2016, 55, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Karimifar, M.; Akbari, K.; ArefNezhad, R.; Fathi, F.; Ghasroldasht, M.M.; Motedayyen, H. Impacts of FcγRIIB and FcγRIIIA gene polymorphisms on systemic lupus erythematous disease activity index. BMC Res. Notes 2021, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Clatworthy, M.R.; Harford, S.K.; Mathews, R.J.; Smith, K.G.C. FcγRIIb inhibits immune complex-induced VEGF-A production and intranodal lymphangiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 17971–17976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bolland, S.; Ravetch, J.V. Spontaneous autoimmune disease in Fc(gamma)RIIB-deficient mice results from strain-specific epistasis. Immunity 2000, 13, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bhunyakarnjanarat, T.; Makjaroen, J.; Saisorn, W.; Hirunsap, K.; Chiewchengchol, J.; Ritprajak, P.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Lupus exacerbation in ovalbumin-induced asthma in Fc gamma receptor IIb deficient mice, partly due to hyperfunction of dendritic cells. Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bhunyakarnjanarat, T.; Udompornpitak, K.; Saisorn, W.; Chantraprapawat, B.; Visitchanakun, P.; Dang, C.P.; Issara-Amphorn, J.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Prominent Indomethacin-Induced Enteropathy in Fcgriib Defi-cient lupus Mice: An Impact of Macrophage Responses and Immune Deposition in Gut. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chancharoenthana, W. , et al., Enhanced lupus progression in alcohol-administered Fc gamma receptor-IIb-deficiency lupus mice, partly through leaky gut-induced inflammation. Immunol Cell Biol 2023, 101, 746–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kulczycki, A. Human neutrophils and eosinophils have structurally distinct Fc gamma receptors. . J. Immunol. 1984, 133, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. de Taeye, S.W. , et al., FcγR Binding and ADCC Activity of Human IgG Allotypes. Front Immunol 2020, 11, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Arnold, M.L.; Kainz, A.; Hidalgo, L.G.; Eskandary, F.; Kozakowski, N.; Wahrmann, M.; Haslacher, H.; Oberbauer, R.; Heilos, A.; Spriewald, B.M.; et al. Functional Fc gamma receptor gene polymorphisms and donor-specific antibody-triggered microcirculation inflammation. Am. J. Transplant. 2018, 18, 2261–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Edberg, J.C. , et al., Genetic linkage and association of Fcgamma receptor IIIA (CD16A) on chromosome 1q23 with human systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46, 2132–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Li, X.; Ptacek, T.S.; E Brown, E.; Edberg, J.C. Fcγ receptors: structure, function and role as genetic risk factors in SLE. Genes Immun. 2009, 10, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Marois, L. , et al., Fc RIIIb Triggers Raft-dependent Calcium Influx in IgG-mediated Responses in Human Neutrophils. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286, 3509–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Santos, V.C.; Grecco, M.; Pereira, K.M.C.; Terzian, C.C.N.; Andrade, L.E.C.; Silva, N.P. Fc gamma receptor IIIb polymorphism and systemic lupus erythematosus: association with disease susceptibility and identification of a novel FCGR3B*01 variant. Lupus 2016, 25, 1237–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hatta, Y. , et al., Association of Fc gamma receptor IIIB, but not of Fc gamma receptor IIA and IIIA polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus in Japanese. Genes Immun 1999, 1, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kurlander, R.J.; Batker, J. The Binding of Human Immunoglobulin G1 Monomer and Small, Covalently Cross-Linked Polymers of Immunoglobulin G1 to Human Peripheral Blood Monocytes and Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes. J. Clin. Investig. 1982, 69, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Messner, R.P. and J. Jelinek, Receptors for human gamma G globulin on human neutrophils. J Clin Invest 1970, 49, 2165–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fleit, H.B.; Wright, S.D.; Durie, C.J.; E Valinsky, J.; Unkeless, J.C. Ontogeny of Fc receptors and complement receptor (CR3) during human myeloid differentiation. J. Clin. Investig. 1984, 73, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shen, L.; Guyre, P.M.; Fanger, M.W. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte function triggered through the high affinity Fc receptor for monomeric IgG. J. Immunol. 1987, 139, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. A Quayle, J.; Watson, F.; Bucknall, R.C.; Edwards, S.W. Neutrophils from the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis express the high affinity immunoglobulin G receptor, FcγRI (CD64): role of immune complexes and cytokines in induction of receptor expression. Immunology 1997, 91, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Nagarajan, S.; Venkiteswaran, K.; Anderson, M.; Sayed, U.; Zhu, C.; Selvaraj, P. Cell-specific, activation-dependent regulation of neutrophil CD32A ligand-binding function. Blood 2000, 95, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Meknache, N.; Jönsson, F.; Laurent, J.; Guinnepain, M.-T.; Daëron, M. Human Basophils Express the Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-Anchored Low-Affinity IgG Receptor FcγRIIIB (CD16B). J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 2542–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Kurosaki, T.; Gander, I.; Wirthmueller, U.; Ravetch, J.V. The beta subunit of the Fc epsilon RI is associated with the Fc gamma RIII on mast cells. J. Exp. Med. 1992, 175, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. de Haas, M.; Kleijer, M.; Minchinton, R.M.; Roos, D.; Borne, A.E.v.D. Soluble Fc gamma RIIIa is present in plasma and is derived from natural killer cells. J. Immunol. 1994, 152, 900–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lanier, L.L.; Phillips, J.H.; Testi, R. Membrane anchoring and spontaneous release of CD16 (FcR III) by natural killer cells and granulocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 1989, 19, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gessner, J.E. , et al., Separate promoters from proximal and medial control regions contribute to the natural killer cell-specific transcription of the human FcgammaRIII-A (CD16-A) receptor gene. J Biol Chem 1996, 271, 30755–30764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Victor, A.R.; Weigel, C.; Scoville, S.D.; Chan, W.K.; Chatman, K.; Nemer, M.M.; Mao, C.; Young, K.A.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; et al. Epigenetic and Posttranscriptional Regulation of CD16 Expression during Human NK Cell Development. J. Immunol. 2018, 200, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Fridman, W.H.; Teillaud, J.L.; Bouchard, C.; Teillaud, C.; Astier, A.; Tartour, E.; Galon, J.; Mathiot, C.; Sautès, C. Soluble Fc gamma receptors. J Leukoc Biol. 1993, 54, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. de la Salle, C. , et al., Release of soluble Fc gamma RII/CD32 molecules by human Langerhans cells: a subtle balance between shedding and secretion? J Invest Dermatol 1992, 99, 15s–17s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bodman-Smith, K.B. , et al., C-reactive protein-mediated phagocytosis and phospholipase D signalling through the high-affinity receptor for immunoglobulin G (FcgammaRI). Immunology 2002, 107, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bruhns, P.; Iannascoli, B.; England, P.; Mancardi, D.A.; Fernandez, N.; Jorieux, S.; Daëron, M. Specificity and affinity of human Fcγ receptors and their polymorphic variants for human IgG subclasses. Blood 2009, 113, 3716–3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Radaev, S. , et al., The structure of a human type III Fcgamma receptor in complex with Fc. J Biol Chem 2001, 276, 16469–16477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Takai, T. Roles of Fc receptors in autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wines, B.D.; Powell, M.S.; Parren, P.W.H.I.; Barnes, N.; Hogarth, P.M. The IgG Fc Contains Distinct Fc Receptor (FcR) Binding Sites: The Leukocyte Receptors FcγRI and FcγRIIa Bind to a Region in the Fc Distinct from That Recognized by Neonatal FcR and Protein A. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 5313–5318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Geuijen, K.P.M.; Oppers-Tiemissen, C.; Egging, D.F.; Simons, P.J.; Boon, L.; Schasfoort, R.B.M.; Eppink, M.H.M. Rapid screening of IgG quality attributes – effects on Fc receptor binding. FEBS Open Bio 2017, 7, 1557–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Lu, J.; Marnell, L.L.; Marjon, K.D.; Mold, C.; Du Clos, T.W.; Sun, P.D. Structural recognition and functional activation of FcγR by innate pentraxins. Nature 2008, 456, 989–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Herberman, R.B.; Djeu, J.Y.; Kay, H.D.; Ortaldo, J.R.; Riccardi, C.; Bonnard, G.D.; Holden, H.T.; Fagnani, R.; Santoni, A.; Puccetti, P. Natural Killer Cells: Characteristics and Regulation of Activity. Immunol. Rev. 1979, 44, 43–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Karas, S.; Rosse, W.; Kurlander, R. Characterization of the igg-fc receptor on human-platelets. Blood 1982, 60, 1277–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Fridman, W.H. , et al., Characterization and function of T cell Fc gamma receptor. Immunol Rev 1981, 56, 51–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. I Connor, R.; Shen, L.; Fanger, M.W. Evaluation of the antibody-dependent cytotoxic capabilities of individual human monocytes. Role of Fc gamma RI and Fc gamma RII and the effects of cytokines at the single cell level. . J. Immunol. 1990, 145, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Graziano, R.F.; Fanger, M.W. Fc gamma RI and Fc gamma RII on monocytes and granulocytes are cytotoxic trigger molecules for tumor cells. J. Immunol. 1987, 139, 3536–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Regnault, A. , et al., Fcgamma receptor-mediated induction of dendritic cell maturation and major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted antigen presentation after immune complex internalization. J Exp Med 1999, 189, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Crockett-Torabi, E.; Fantone, J.C. Soluble and insoluble immune complexes activate human neutrophil NADPH oxidase by distinct Fc gamma receptor-specific mechanisms. J. Immunol. 1990, 145, 3026–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Arman, M.; Krauel, K. Human platelet IgG Fc receptor FcγRIIA in immunity and thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2015, 13, 893–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Edberg, J.C.; Kimberly, R.P. Modulation of Fc gamma and complement receptor function by the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored form of Fc gamma RIII. J. Immunol. 1994, 152, 5826–5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Yang, H.; Jiang, H.; Song, Y.; Chen, D.; Shen, X.; Chen, J. Neutrophil CD16b crosslinking induces lipid raft-mediated activation of SHP-2 and affects cytokine expression and retarded neutrophil apoptosis. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 362, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Treffers, L.W.; van Houdt, M.; Bruggeman, C.W.; Heineke, M.H.; Zhao, X.W.; van der Heijden, J.; Nagelkerke, S.Q.; Verkuijlen, P.J.J.H.; Geissler, J.; Lissenberg-Thunnissen, S.; et al. FcγRIIIb Restricts Antibody-Dependent Destruction of Cancer Cells by Human Neutrophils. Front. Immunol. 2019, 9, 3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kimura, K.; Kobayashi, D.; Hatoyama, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Takayanagi, R.; Yamada, Y. Effects of FCGRIIIa -158V/F polymorphism on antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity activity of adalimumab. APMIS 2017, 125, 1102–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Alemán, O.R.; Rosales, C. Human neutrophil Fc gamma receptors: different buttons for different responses. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2023, 114, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Fousert, E.; Toes, R.; Desai, J. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Take the Central Stage in Driving Autoimmune Responses. Cells 2020, 9, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Migliorini, P.; Baldini, C.; Rocchi, V.; Bombardieri, S. Anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibodies. Autoimmunity 2005, 38, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, X.; Xia, Y. Anti-double Stranded DNA Antibodies: Origin, Pathogenicity, and Targeted Therapies. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Bolland, S.; Pearse, R.N.; Kurosaki, T.; Ravetch, J.V. SHIP Modulates Immune Receptor Responses by Regulating Membrane Association of Btk. Immunity 1998, 8, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Alemán, O.R. , et al., Transforming Growth Factor-β-Activated Kinase 1 Is Required for Human FcγRIIIb-Induced Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation. Front Immunol 2016, 7, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Arepally, G.M. , Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2017, 129, 2864–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. McMahon, S.R.; Chava, S.; Taatjes-Sommer, H.S.; Meagher, S.; Brummel-Ziedins, K.E.; Schneider, D.J. Variation in platelet expression of FcγRIIa after myocardial infarction. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2019, 48, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Perdomo, J.; Leung, H.H.L.; Ahmadi, Z.; Yan, F.; Chong, J.J.H.; Passam, F.H.; Chong, B.H. Neutrophil activation and NETosis are the major drivers of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gorji, A.E.; Roudbari, Z.; Alizadeh, A.; Sadeghi, B. Investigation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with integrating transcriptomics and genome wide association information. Gene 2019, 706, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ioan-Facsinay, A. , et al., FcgammaRI (CD64) contributes substantially to severity of arthritis, hypersensitivity responses, and protection from bacterial infection. Immunity 2002, 16, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Alizadeh, B.Z.; Valdigem, G.; Coenen, M.J.; Zhernakova, A.; Franke, B.; Monsuur, A.; van Riel, P.L.; Barrera, P.; Radstake, T.R.; Roep, B.O.; et al. Association analysis of functional variants of the FcgRIIa and FcgRIIIa genes with type 1 diabetes, celiac disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007, 16, 2552–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Franke, L.; el Bannoudi, H.; Jansen, D.T.S.L.; Kok, K.; Trynka, G.; Diogo, D.; Swertz, M.; Fransen, K.; Knevel, R.; Gutierrez-Achury, J.; et al. Association analysis of copy numbers of FC-gamma receptor genes for rheumatoid arthritis and other immune-mediated phenotypes. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2015, 24, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Sareneva, I. , et al., Linkage and association study of FcgammaR polymorphisms in celiac disease. Tissue Antigens 2009, 73, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Tanigaki, K.; Sundgren, N.; Khera, A.; Vongpatanasin, W.; Mineo, C.; Shaul, P.W. Fcγ Receptors and Ligands and Cardiovascular Disease. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 368–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Erbe, A.K.; Wang, W.; Goldberg, J.; Gallenberger, M.; Kim, K.; Carmichael, L.; Hess, D.; Mendonca, E.A.; Song, Y.; Hank, J.A.; et al. FCGR Polymorphisms Influence Response to IL2 in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 2159–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Olfat, M.; Silverman, E.D.; Levy, D.M. Rituximab therapy has a rapid and durable response for refractory cytopenia in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2015, 24, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Robeson, K.R.; Kumar, A.; Keung, B.; DiCapua, D.B.; Grodinsky, E.; Patwa, H.S.; Stathopoulos, P.A.; Goldstein, J.M.; O’connor, K.C.; Nowak, R.J. Durability of the Rituximab Response in Acetylcholine Receptor Autoantibody–Positive Myasthenia Gravis. JAMA Neurol. 2017, 74, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Evangelopoulos, M.; Andreadou, E.; Koutsis, G.; Koutoulidis, V.; Anagnostouli, M.; Katsika, P.; Evangelopoulos, D.; Evdokimidis, I.; Kilidireas, C. Treatment of neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with rituximab using a maintenance treatment regimen and close CD19 B cell monitoring. A six-year follow-up. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 372, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Fernández-Megía, M.; Casanova-Estruch, B.; Pérez-Miralles, F.; Ruiz-Ramos, J.; Alcalá-Vicente, C.; Poveda-Andrés, J. Clinical evaluation of rituximab treatment for neuromyelitis optica. Neurologia 2015, 30, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Alldredge, B.D.; Jordan, A.D.; Imitola, J.; Racke, M.K. Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab: Experience of a Single Multiple Sclerosis Center. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2018, 41, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yamout, B.I.; El-Ayoubi, N.K.; Nicolas, J.; El Kouzi, Y.; Khoury, S.J.; Zeineddine, M.M. Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Observational Study. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Hebert, V.; Joly, P. Rituximab in Pemphigus. Immunotherapy 2017, 10, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. DiLillo, D.J.; Ravetch, J.V. Fc-Receptor Interactions Regulate Both Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory Therapeutic Antibody Effector Functions. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015, 3, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Clynes, R.A. , et al., Inhibitory Fc receptors modulate in vivo cytotoxicity against tumor targets. Nat Med 2000, 6, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Ellsworth, J.L.; Maurer, M.; Harder, B.; Hamacher, N.; Lantry, M.; Lewis, K.B.; Rene, S.; Byrnes-Blake, K.; Underwood, S.; Waggie, K.S.; et al. Targeting Immune Complex-Mediated Hypersensitivity with Recombinant Soluble Human FcγRIA (CD64A). J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Imbach, P. , et al., High-dose intravenous gammaglobulin therapy of refractory, in particular idiopathic thrombocytopenia in childhood. Helv Paediatr Acta 1981, 36, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  155. Mimoto, F. , et al., Engineered antibody Fc variant with selectively enhanced FcγRIIb binding over both FcγRIIa(R131) and FcγRIIa(H131). Protein Eng Des Sel 2013, 26, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Bosques, C.J.; Manning, A.M. Fc-gamma receptors: Attractive targets for autoimmune drug discovery searching for intelligent therapeutic designs. Autoimmun. Rev. 2016, 15, 1081–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Ben Mkaddem, S.; Benhamou, M.; Monteiro, R.C. Understanding Fc Receptor Involvement in Inflammatory Diseases: From Mechanisms to New Therapeutic Tools. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Kaneko, Y.; Nimmerjahn, F.; Ravetch, J.V. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Immunoglobulin G Resulting from Fc Sialylation. Science 2006, 313, 670–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Fantini, M.; Arlen, P.M.; Tsang, K.Y. Potentiation of natural killer cells to overcome cancer resistance to NK cell-based therapy and to enhance antibody-based immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1275904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Timeline of Fcγ receptors research. The figure below shows a timeline on the research of Fc gamma receptors, it is a basic and informative line showing the evolution of research on the subject, important points may not have been included in the figure. Dates & references: 1965[7], 1965[7], 1966[8], 1966[8], 1967[9], 1968[10,11], 1970[12,13,14], 1972[15], 1975[16], 1976[17], 1977[18], 1979[19], 1980[20], 1980[20], 1982[21], 1982[21], 1983[22], 1983[22], 1984[6], 1988[23,24], 1989[25,26,27], 1995[28], 1996[29],1998[30], 1999[31], 2000[32], 2004[33],2008[34], 2013[35], 2016[36], 2017[37], 2019[38], 2020[39], 2022[40], 2023[41], 2024[42].
Figure 1. Timeline of Fcγ receptors research. The figure below shows a timeline on the research of Fc gamma receptors, it is a basic and informative line showing the evolution of research on the subject, important points may not have been included in the figure. Dates & references: 1965[7], 1965[7], 1966[8], 1966[8], 1967[9], 1968[10,11], 1970[12,13,14], 1972[15], 1975[16], 1976[17], 1977[18], 1979[19], 1980[20], 1980[20], 1982[21], 1982[21], 1983[22], 1983[22], 1984[6], 1988[23,24], 1989[25,26,27], 1995[28], 1996[29],1998[30], 1999[31], 2000[32], 2004[33],2008[34], 2013[35], 2016[36], 2017[37], 2019[38], 2020[39], 2022[40], 2023[41], 2024[42].
Preprints 143180 g001
Figure 2. FcγRIIIb receptor polymorphisms distribution in exon 3 (EC1): The positions of the nucleotides that have changes can be distinguished according to AJ581669.1, which was generated and used in the initial studies of the receptor. The classification of clinical significance (ClinVar) is also shown, and some cases considered as pathogenic to date are under review. The frequency of the variant according to the database of the 1000 genomes, the changes according to Single Nucleotide Variants database and the name of the variant according to the global database of all SNPs are shown. Additionally includes the NCBI Reference Sequence Database (RefSeq) to identify the location of variants on the chromosome (NC_000001.11), gene (NG_032926.1), protein (NP_001231682.2), and mRNA (AJ581669.1).
Figure 2. FcγRIIIb receptor polymorphisms distribution in exon 3 (EC1): The positions of the nucleotides that have changes can be distinguished according to AJ581669.1, which was generated and used in the initial studies of the receptor. The classification of clinical significance (ClinVar) is also shown, and some cases considered as pathogenic to date are under review. The frequency of the variant according to the database of the 1000 genomes, the changes according to Single Nucleotide Variants database and the name of the variant according to the global database of all SNPs are shown. Additionally includes the NCBI Reference Sequence Database (RefSeq) to identify the location of variants on the chromosome (NC_000001.11), gene (NG_032926.1), protein (NP_001231682.2), and mRNA (AJ581669.1).
Preprints 143180 g002
Table 1. Human Type I FcγR Affinity and Expression in Immune Cells.
Table 1. Human Type I FcγR Affinity and Expression in Immune Cells.
Preprints 143180 i001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated