Submitted:
10 December 2024
Posted:
10 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Breeding Bird Community in Different Subcategories of Built-Up Lands in the City of Ponta Delgada
| Species | A, 500 dm | B, 246 dm | C, 617 dm | D, 412 dm | ||||||||
| N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | |
| Passer domesticus | 181 | 36.2 | 42.3 | 56 | 22.4 | 40.9 | 105 | 16.9 | 42.2 | 136 | 33.2 | 57.1 |
| Streptopelia decaocto | 52 | 10.4 | 12.1 | 28 | 11.2 | 20.4 | 50 | 8.1 | 20.1 | 23 | 5.6 | 9.7 |
| Columba livia | 60 | 12.0 | 14.0 | 11 | 4.4 | 8.0 | 12 | 1.9 | 4.8 | 7 | 1.7 | 2.9 |
| Columba palumbus | 6 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 11 | 2.7 | 4.6 |
| Turdus merula | 25 | 5.0 | 5.8 | 6 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 22 | 3.5 | 8.8 | 16 | 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Sylvia atricapilla | 19 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 7 | 2.8 | 5.1 | 20 | 3.2 | 8.0 | 14 | 3.4 | 5.9 |
| Serinus canarensis | 17 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 4 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 21 | 3.4 | 8.4 | 8 | 2.0 | 3.4 |
| Sturnus vulgaris | 66 | 13.2 | 15.4 | 24 | 9.6 | 17.5 | 11 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 20 | 4.9 | 8.4 |
| Erithacus rubecula | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Chloris chloris | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 3 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Carduelis carduelis | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Motacilla cinerea | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Coturnix coturnix | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 428 | 85.6 | 100.0 | 137 | 54.8 | 100.0 | 249 | 40.2 | 100.0 | 238 | 58.0 | 100.0 | |
| Species | E, 396 dm | F, 147 dm | G, 423 dm | H, 55 dm | ||||||||
| N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | |
| Passer domesticus | 51 | 12.8 | 38.3 | 6 | 4.0 | 19.4 | 111 | 26.4 | 38.4 | 6 | 10.9 | 18.8 |
| Streptopelia decaocto | 13 | 3.3 | 9.8 | 2 | 1.3 | 6.5 | 21 | 5.0 | 7.3 | 2 | 3.6 | 6.3 |
| Columba livia | 5 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 19 | 4.5 | 6.6 | 3 | 5.5 | 9.4 |
| Columba palumbus | 5 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 2 | 1.3 | 6.5 | 5 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 4 | 7.3 | 12.5 |
| Turdus merula | 10 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 5 | 3.3 | 16.1 | 26 | 6.2 | 9.0 | 4 | 7.3 | 12.5 |
| Sylvia atricapilla | 11 | 2.8 | 8.3 | 6 | 4.0 | 19.4 | 19 | 4.5 | 6.6 | 5 | 9.1 | 15.6 |
| Serinus canarensis | 7 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 8 | 5.3 | 25.8 | 27 | 6.4 | 9.3 | 5 | 9.1 | 15.6 |
| Sturnus vulgaris | 25 | 6.3 | 18.8 | 1 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 46 | 11.0 | 15.9 | 1 | 1.8 | 3.1 |
| Erithacus rubecula | 1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Chloris chloris | 2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Carduelis carduelis | 3 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 2 | 3.6 | 6.3 |
| Motacilla cinerea | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Coturnix coturnix | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 133 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 31 | 20.7 | 100.0 | 289 | 68.8 | 100.0 | 32 | 58.2 | 100.0 | |
Appendix B. Breeding Bird Community in Green Lands in the City of Ponta Delgada
| Species | J. Canto, 10 ha | J. Borges, 3 ha | Univ. Azor., 6 ha | XXI seq., 6ha | Total, 25 ha | ||||||||||
| N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | N | Den | Dom | |
| Turdus merula | 39 | 39.0 | 24.4 | 14 | 46.7 | 15.7 | 16 | 26.7 | 11.4 | 16 | 26.7 | 14.5 | 85 | 34.0 | 17.0 |
| Streptopelia decaocto | 24 | 24.0 | 15.0 | 19 | 63.3 | 21.3 | 13 | 21.7 | 9.3 | 12 | 20.0 | 10.9 | 68 | 27.2 | 13.6 |
| Passer domesticus | 8 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 23 | 76.7 | 25.8 | 25 | 41.7 | 17.9 | 5 | 8.3 | 4.5 | 61 | 24.4 | 12.2 |
| Serinus canarensis | 17 | 17.0 | 10.6 | 7 | 23.3 | 7.9 | 10 | 16.7 | 7.1 | 21 | 35.0 | 19.1 | 55 | 22.0 | 11.0 |
| Sturnus vulgaris | 17 | 17.0 | 10.6 | 6 | 20.0 | 6.7 | 7 | 11.7 | 5.0 | 14 | 23.3 | 12.7 | 44 | 17.6 | 8.8 |
| Sylvia atricapilla | 8 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 2 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 5 | 8.3 | 3.6 | 10 | 16.7 | 9.1 | 25 | 10.0 | 5.0 |
| Chloris chloris | 11 | 11.0 | 6.9 | 4 | 13.3 | 4.5 | 6 | 10.0 | 4.3 | 4 | 6.7 | 3.6 | 25 | 10.0 | 5.0 |
| Columba livia | 1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20 | 33.3 | 14.3 | 7 | 11.7 | 6.4 | 28 | 11.2 | 5.6 |
| Columba palumbus | 5 | 5.0 | 3.1 | 1 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 11 | 18.3 | 7.9 | 4 | 6.7 | 3.6 | 21 | 8.4 | 4.2 |
| Carduelis carduelis | 11 | 11.0 | 6.9 | 4 | 13.3 | 4.5 | 20 | 33.3 | 14.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 35 | 14.0 | 7.0 |
| Erithacus rubecula | 13 | 13.0 | 8.1 | 3 | 10.0 | 3.4 | 2 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 2 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 20 | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Fringilla coelebs | 2 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 2 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 2 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 8 | 13.3 | 7.3 | 14 | 5.6 | 2.8 |
| Astrilda astrild | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6 | 10.0 | 5.5 | 6 | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| Motacilla cinerea | 1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 4 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Anas platyrhynchos | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Cairina moschata | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Regulus regulus | 1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Buteo buteo | 1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Asio otus | 1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Psittacula krameri | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Total | 160 | 160.0 | 100.0 | 89 | 296.7 | 100.0 | 140 | 233.3 | 100.0 | 110 | 183.3 | 100.0 | 499 | 199.6 | 100.0 |
Appendix C. Breeding Bird Community in Coast and Rural Lands in the City of Ponta Delgada
| Species↓ | Coast area | Rural area | ||||||||||
| a | b | c | N | Den | Dom | a | b | c | N | Den | Dom | |
| dm→ | 146 | 150 | 25 | 321 | 120 | 100 | 150 | 370 | ||||
| Passer domesticus | 45 | 69 | 8 | 122 | 38.1 | 49.2 | 19 | 50 | 36 | 105 | 28.4 | 41.2 |
| Streptopelia decaocto | 15 | 5 | 1 | 21 | 6.6 | 8.5 | 2 | 11 | 20 | 33 | 8.9 | 12.9 |
| Columba livia | 10 | 37 | 4 | 51 | 15.9 | 20.6 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 5.1 | 7.5 |
| Columba palumbus | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Turdus merula | 6 | 11 | 2 | 19 | 5.9 | 7.7 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 28 | 7.6 | 11.0 |
| Sylvia atricapilla | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 3.2 | 4.7 |
| Serinus canarensis | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 4.7 | 6.0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 3.2 | 4.7 |
| Sturnus vulgaris | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 1 | 10 | 23 | 34 | 9.2 | 13.3 |
| Erithacus rubecula | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2.2 | 3.1 |
| Chloris chloris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Carduelis carduelis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Motacilla cinerea | 0 | 0 | 0 | 122 | 38.1 | 49.2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Coturnix coturnix | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 6.6 | 8.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Total | 92 | 135 | 21 | 248 | 77.5 | 100 | 56 | 92 | 107 | 255 | 68.9 | 100 |
References
- Castanho, R.A.; Naranjo Gómez, J.M.; Couto, G.; Pimentel, P.; Sousa, Á.; Batista, M.D.G. Analyzing the Patterns, Trends and Dynamics of the Land-Use Changes in Azores Region: From 1990 to 2018. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, P.R. Evolution on islands. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Emerson, B.C. Evolution on oceanic islands: molecular phylogenetic approach es to understanding pattern and process. Mol. Ecol 2002, 11, 951–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodrigues, P.; Tristão Da Cunha, R. Azorean birds – a natural heritage. Açoreana, Supl. 2011, 7, 319–330. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, P.; Lopes, R.J.; Drovetski, S.V.; Reis, S.; Ramos, J.A.; Tristão Da Cunha, R. Hylogeography and genetic diversity of the Robin (Erithacus rubecula) in the Azores Islands: Evidence of a recent colonization. J Orn. 2013, 154, 889–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, P. Azores Passeriformes – a model for evolutionary studies. Bol. Núcleo Cult. Horta 2014, 23, 135–155. [Google Scholar]
- Talavera, J.A.; Cunha, L.; Arévalo, J.R.; Talavera, I.P.; Kille, P.; Novo, M. Anthropogenic disturbance and environmental factors drive the diversity and distribution of earthworms in São Miguel Island (Azores, Portugal). Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 145, 103301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borges, P.A.V.; Gabriel, R.; Arroz, A.; Costa, A.; Cunha, R.; Silva, L.; Mendonça, E.; Martins, A.M.; Reis, F.; Cardoso, P. The Azorean Biodiversity Portal: An internet database for regional biodiversity outreach. System. & Biodiv 2010, 8, 423434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borges, P.A.V.; Lamelas-Lopez, L.; Andrade, R.; Lhoumeau, S.; Vieira, V.; Soares, A.O.; Borges, I.; Boieiro, M.; Cardoso, P.; Crespo, L.C.F.; Karsholt, O.; Schülke, M.; Serrano, A.R.M.; Quartau, J.A.; Assing, V. An updated checklist of Azorean arthropods (Arthropoda). Biodiv. Data J. 2022, 10, e97682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barcelos, L.; Rodrigues, P.; Bried, J.; Mendonça, E.; Gabriel, R.; Borges, P. Birds from the Azores: An updated list with some comments on species distribution. Biodiv. Data J. 2015, 3, e6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiengo, R.; Merino-De-Miguel, S.; Uchôa, J.; Gil, A. A Land Cover Change Detection Approach to Assess the Effectiveness of Conservation Projects: A Study Case on the EU-Funded LIFE Projects in São Miguel Island, Azores (2002–2021). Land 2024, 13, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, W.J. Ecological Census Techniques: a handbook; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Bibby, C.J.; Burgess, N.D.; Hill, D.A.; Mustoe, S. Bird Census Techniques, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kopij, G. Avian diversity in an urbanized South African grassland. Zool. & Ecol. 2015, 25, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopij, G. Population density and structure of birds breeding in an urban habitat dominated by large baobabs (Adansonia digitata), Northern Namibia. Biosyst. Divers 2019, 27, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopij, G. Population density and structure of a breeding bird community in a suburban habitat in the Cuvelai drainage system, northern Namibia. Arxius Misc. Zool. 2021, 19, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopij, G. Structure of breeding bird assemblages in the city of Windhoek, Namibia. Arxius Misc. Zool. 2023, 21, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopij, G. Changes in the structure of avian community along a moisture gradient in an urbanized tropical riparian forest. Pol. J. Ecol. 2020, 68, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopij, G. Structures of breeding bird communities in wooded and densely built-up areas in a city centre in SW Poland. Acta Mus. Sil. Sci. Natur. 2024, 73, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopij, G. The effect of rainfall on the population densities and community structure of birds in an urbanized Zambezi riparian forest. Diversity 2023, 15, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopij, G. [Breeding bird community of the residential quarter of Sępolno, Wrocław]. Ptaki Śląska 2004, 15, 121-127. 2004, 15, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
- Kopij, G. [Breeding bird community of the Wrocław city centre]. Acta Sci. Polon., Biol 2006, 5, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
- Kopij, G. Provisional atlas of breeding birds of Hentjes Bay in the coastal Namib Desert. Nam. J. Envir. 2022, 6C: 1-6. https://www.nje.org.na/index.php/nje/article/view/volume6-kopij.
- Kopij, G. Provisional atlas of breeding birds of Swakopmund in the coastal Namib Desert. Lanioturdus 2018, 51, 2–12. [Google Scholar]
- Kopij, G. Provisional atlas of breeding birds of Walvis Bay in the coastal Namib Desert. Biologija 2023, 69, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopij, G. Population densities of birds breeding in urban environment dominated by allotment gardens and other ‘green’ areas in a central European city. Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur. 2022, 71, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunn, A.M.; Weston, M.A. A Review of Terres trial Bird Atlases of the World and Their Application. Emu 2008, 108, 42–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magle, S.B.; Hunt, V.M.; Vernon, M.; Crooks, K.R. Urban Wildlife Research: Past, Present, and Future. Biol. Conserv 2012, 155, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luniak, M. Urban ornithological atlases in Europe: a review. In Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments; Murgui, E., Hedblom, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 209–223. [Google Scholar]







| Land form | N. of pairs | N. of spp. | Overall density | Cumulative dominance | Dominance index | N. of dom. | H’ | J’ | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costal | 248 | 10 | 54.9 | 90.4 | 0.70 | 5 | 1.53 | 0.67 | 0.70 |
| Urban | 1537 | 14 | 67.9 | 95.3 | 0.55 | 7 | 1.83 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
| Rural | 255 | 13 | 77.5 | 85.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 1.82 | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| Greenery | 499 | 20 | 68.9 | 85.2 | 0.31 | 9 | 2.46 | 0.82 | 0.90 |
| Total | 2539 | 21 | 67.9 | 91.3 | 0.49 | 7 | 2.03 | 0.68 | 0.81 |
| Parameter | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of pairs | 428 | 137 | 249 | 238 | 133 | 31 | 289 | 32 |
| Number of species | 10 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 9 |
| Overall density | 85.6 | 54.8 | 40.2 | 58.0 | 33.3 | 20.7 | 68.8 | 58.2 |
| Cumulative dominance | 89.6 | 83.9 | 79.5 | 87.8 | 88.0 | 93.7 | 93.1 | 97.0 |
| Dominance index | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.34 |
| N. of dominant species | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| H’ index | 1.70 | 1.62 | 1.74 | 1.52 | 1.90 | 1.85 | 1.93 | 2.09 |
| J’ index | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| D index | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.90 |
| Species | Costal land, 32 ha | Urban land, 280 ha | Rural land, 37 ha | Green land, 25 ha | Total, 374 ha | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Den. | Dom. | N | Den. | Dom. | N | Den. | Dom. | N | Den. | Dom. | N | Den. | Dom. | |
| Passer domesticus | 122 | 38.1 | 49.2 | 652 | 23.3 | 42.4 | 105 | 28.4 | 41.2 | 61 | 24.4 | 12.2 | 940 | 25.13 | 37.02 |
| Streptopelia decaocto | 21 | 6.6 | 8.5 | 191 | 6.8 | 12.4 | 33 | 8.9 | 12.9 | 68 | 27.2 | 13.6 | 313 | 8.37 | 12.33 |
| Turdus merula | 19 | 5.9 | 7.7 | 114 | 4.1 | 7.4 | 28 | 7.6 | 11.0 | 85 | 34.0 | 17.0 | 246 | 6.58 | 9.69 |
| Sturnus vulgaris | 9 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 194 | 6.9 | 12.6 | 34 | 9.2 | 13.3 | 44 | 17.6 | 8.8 | 281 | 7.51 | 11.07 |
| Columba livia | 51 | 15.9 | 20.6 | 117 | 4.2 | 7.6 | 19 | 5.1 | 7.5 | 28 | 11.2 | 5.6 | 215 | 5.75 | 8.47 |
| Serinus canarensis | 15 | 4.7 | 6.0 | 97 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 12 | 3.2 | 4.7 | 55 | 22.0 | 11.0 | 179 | 4.79 | 7.05 |
| Sylvia atricapilla | 5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 101 | 3.6 | 6.6 | 12 | 3.2 | 4.7 | 25 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 143 | 3.82 | 5.63 |
| Columba palumbus | 5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 36 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 21 | 8.4 | 4.2 | 63 | 1.68 | 2.48 |
| Erithacus rubecula | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 20 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 32 | 0.86 | 1.26 |
| Chloris chloris | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 35 | 0.94 | 1.38 |
| Carduelis carduelis | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 11 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 35 | 14.0 | 7.0 | 48 | 1.28 | 1.89 |
| Motacilla cinerea | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 4 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 7 | 0.19 | 0.28 |
| Coturnix coturnix | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9 | 0.24 | 0.35 |
| Fringilla coelebs | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 10 | 0.27 | 0.39 |
| Estrilda astrild | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 6 | 0.16 | 0.24 |
| Anas platyrhynchos | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Cairina moschata | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Regulus regulus | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Buteo buteo | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Asio otus | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Psittacula krameri | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Total | 248 | 77.5 | 100 | 1537 | 54.9 | 100 | 255 | 68.9 | 100 | 499 | 199.6 | 100 | 2539 | 67.9 | 100 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).