Submitted:
26 November 2024
Posted:
28 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Objective
2.2. Participants
2.3. AF Detection Methodology: Smartwatch versus Telemetry
2.4. Technical data of PPG in smartwatches
2.5. Statistical analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Data availability statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation 2014, 129, 837–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bizhanov KA, Аbzaliyev KB, Baimbetov AK, Sarsenbayeva AB, Lyan E. Atrial fibrillation: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical complications (literature review). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2023, 34, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021, 42, 373–498. [Google Scholar]
- Staerk L, Sherer JA, Ko D, Benjamin EJ, Helm RH. Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Outcomes. Circulation Research 2017, 120, 1501–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hocini M, Ho SY, Kawara T, Linnenbank AC, Potse M, Shah D et al. Electrical conduction in canine pulmonary veins: electrophysiological and anatomic correlation. Circulation 2002, 105, 2442–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishii Y, Schuessler RB, Gaynor SL, Hames K, Damiano RJ. Postoperative atrial fibrillation: The role of the inflammatory response. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017, 153, 1357–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eikelboom R, Sanjanwala R, Le M-L, Yamashita MH, Arora RC. Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2021, 111, 544–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phan K, Ha HSK, Phan S, Medi C, Thomas SP, Yan TD. New-onset atrial fibrillation following coronary bypass surgery predicts long-term mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015, 48, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorén E, Wernroth M-L, Christersson C, Grinnemo K-H, Jidéus L, Ståhle E. Compared with matched controls, patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) have increased long-term AF after CABG, and POAF is further associated with increased ischemic stroke, heart failure and mortality even after adjustment for AF. Clin Res Cardiol 2020, 109, 1232–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, Ramsay J, Duke P, Mazer CD et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA 2004, 291, 1720–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lowres N, Mulcahy G, Jin K, Gallagher R, Neubeck L, Freedman B. Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients discharged in sinus rhythm after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018, 26, 504–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gerçek M, Börgermann J, Gummert J, Gerçek M. Five-year-outcome of new-onset perioperative atrial fibrillation after left atrial appendage amputation concomitant with cardiac surgery. Clin Res Cardiol 2023, 112, 1800–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mannhart D, Lischer M, Knecht S, Du Fay de Lavallaz J, Strebel I, Serban T et al. Clinical Validation of 5 Direct-to-Consumer Wearable Smart Devices to Detect Atrial Fibrillation: BASEL Wearable Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2023, 9, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pengel LKD, Robbers-Visser D, Groenink M, Winter MM, Schuuring MJ, Bouma BJ et al. A comparison of ECG-based home monitoring devices in adults with CHD. Cardiol Young 2022, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas 2007, 28, R1–R39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Withings. The world’s first analog watch with clinically validated ECG - ScanWatch | Withings. Available online: https://www.withings.com/uk/en/scanwatch (accessed on 6 September 2024).
- Maeda Y, Sekine M, Tamura T. The advantages of wearable green reflected photoplethysmography. J Med Syst 2011, 35, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Apple. Official Apple Support; 2024. Available online: https://support.apple.com/ (accessed on 23 November 2024).
- Withings | Support. ScanWatch - Clinical studies; 2023. Available online: https://support.withings.com/hc/en-us/articles/360004508038-ScanWatch-Clinical-studies (accessed on 26 October 2024).
- Withings | Support. ScanWatch - How does ScanWatch detect Atrial Fibrillation (AFib)?; 2024. Available online: https://support.withings.com/hc/en-us/articles/360009956537-ScanWatch-How-does-ScanWatch-detect-Atrial-Fibrillation-AFib (accessed on 5 August 2024).
- Babar F, Cheema AM, Ahmad Z, Sarfraz A, Sarfraz Z, Ashraff H et al. Sensitivity and Specificity of Wearables for Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Populations: A Systematic Review. Curr Cardiol Rep 2023, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Petryszyn P, Niewinski P, Staniak A, Piotrowski P, Well A, Well M et al. Effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation and its determinants. A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019, 14, e0213198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen W, Khurshid S, Singer DE, Atlas SJ, Ashburner JM, Ellinor PT et al. Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Using Wearable Devices. JAMA Health Forum 2022, 3, e222419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shcherbina A, Mattsson CM, Waggott D, Salisbury H, Christle JW, Hastie T et al. Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort. J Pers Med 2017, 7. [Google Scholar]




| Smartwatch Screening | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no AF | AF | ||||
| Telemetry Screening | n | 228 | 3 | 231 | |
| no AF | % of Telemetry Screening | 98,7% | 1,3% | 100% | |
| % of Smartwatch Screening | 96,2% | 13% | 88,8% | ||
| n | 9 | 20 | 29 | ||
| AF | % of Telemetry Screening | 31,0% | 69,0% | 100% | |
| % of Smartwatch Screening | 3,8% | 87,0% | 11,2% | ||
| n | 237 | 23 | 260 | ||
| Total | % of Telemetry Screening | 91,2% | 8,8% | 100% | |
| % of Smartwatch Screening | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| Variable | With AF | Without AF | Total | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 69,76 (±9,716) | 64,92 (±10,094) | 65,46 (±10,15) | 0,016 |
| CHA2DS2-VASc-Score | 4,03 (±1,546) | 3,36 (±1,630) | 3,44 (±1,632) | 0,035 |
| Female | 6 (20,7%) | 48 (20,8%) | 54 (20,8%) | 0,991 |
| CABG | 11 (37,9%) | 104 (45%) | 115 (44,2%) | 0,466 |
| Valve surgery | 8 (27,6%) | 84 (36,4%) | 92 (35,4%) | 0,343 |
| > 1 surgical indication | 10 (34,5%) | 38 (16,5%) | 48 (18,5%) | 0,028 |
| Diabetes mellitus I/II | 10 (34,5%) | 69 (29,9%) | 79 (30,4%) | 0,614 |
| Obesity | 14 (48,3%) | 81 (35,1%) | 95 (36,5%) | 0,170 |
| Coronary artery disease | 24 (82,8%) | 165 (71,4%) | 189 (72,7%) | 0,178 |
| Arterial Hypertension | 25 (86,2%) | 191 (82,7%) | 216 (83,1%) | 0,625 |
| Hyperlipidemia/-cholesterinemia | 17 (58,6%) | 162 (70,1%) | 179 (86,8%) | 0,217 |
| Chronic renal failure | 6 (20,7%) | 27 (11,7%) | 33 (12,7%) | 0,198 |
| COPD | 1 (3,4%) | 7 (3%) | 8 (3,1%) | 0,904 |
| OSAS | 0 (0%) | 12 (5,2%) | 12 (4,6%) | 0,088 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).