Submitted:
20 November 2024
Posted:
21 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
With an emphasis on how social media influencers affect travelers' views, preferences, and travel decisions, this research investigates the impact of these individuals on tourism decision-making. Using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, the research evaluates the influence of key influencer characteristics- such as authenticity, trustworthiness, expertise, and engagement on the attitudes and decisions of potential travelers. The findings aim to provide tourism marketers with actionable insights on effective influencer collaboration strategies to enhance engagement and promote destinations. A sample of 108 respondents was surveyed, and the data was analyzed using Chi-Square tests and simple percentage analysis to draw meaningful conclusions. The results offer valuable guidance for crafting targeted marketing campaigns that appeal to today’s digitally engaged and travel-savvy audience.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Aim of the study
- Assess the influence of social media influencers on tourism decision-making.
- Identify key characteristics of influencers that enhance engagement and credibility.
- Examine influencer marketing's effectiveness compared to traditional tourism marketing.
4. Need for the study
5. Scope of the study
6. Limitations of the study
7. Methodology
8. Data analysis and interpretation
| Demographics | Category | Population (N=108) | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 20-30$31-40$41 above$Below 20 | 65$11$3$29 | 60.19%$10.19%$2.77%$26.85% |
| Gender | Male$Female | 65$43 | 60.19%$39.81% |
| Marital Status | Unmarried$Married | 59$49 | 54.62%$45.38% |
| Education | Non- Graduates$Graduates | 35$73 | 32.40%$67.60% |
| Monthly family income | Less than 10,000$11,000-30,000$31,000-50,000$Above 50,000 | 6$13$45$44 | 5.56%$12.03%$41.67%$40.74% |
8.1. Demographic Profile
8.2. Assess the influence of social media influencers on tourism decision-making
| Aspects | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Scenic locations | 44 | 40.74% |
| Local food and culture | 30 | 27.78% |
| Activities and adventures | 20 | 18.52% |
| Accommodation options | 5 | 4.63% |
| Unique experiences | 9 | 8.33% |
| Total | 108 | 100% |
| Count | Social media platform preference | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Youtube | ||||||
| Age | 21-30 | 14 | 29 | 8 | 14 | 65 |
| 31-40 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 11 | |
| 41 above | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| Below 20 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 29 | |
| Total | 17 | 55 | 16 | 20 | 108 | |
| Particulars | Value | df | Asymptotic Significance (2-sided) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson Chi-Square | 19.777a | 9 | 0.019 |
| Likelihood Ratio | 24.383 | 9 | 0.004 |
| N of Valid Cases | 108 | ||
| 9 cells (56.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .44. | |||
8.3. Identify key characteristics of influencers that enhance engagement and credibility
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Authenticity (they appear genuine in their posts) | 19 | 17.60% |
| Expertise (they have travel-related knowledge or experience) | 44 | 40.74% |
| Relatability (their lifestyle or preferences align with yours) | 6 | 5.55% |
| Popularity (number of followers and likes) | 30 | 27.78% |
| Consistency (they regularly post about travel content) | 9 | 8.33% |
| Total | 108 | 100% |
8.4. Examine influencer marketing's effectiveness compared to traditional tourism marketing.
| Contents | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Influencer recommendations | 63 | 58.33% |
| Official tourism board content | 20 | 18.52% |
| Travel website or guide reviews | 15 | 13.89% |
| Traditional ads | 10 | 9.26% |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 108 | 100% |
| Options | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Influencer recommendation | 65 | 60.19% |
| Traditional ad | 23 | 21.30% |
| Both equally | 12 | 11.11% |
| Neither | 8 | 7.40% |
| Total | 108 | 100% |
9. Suggestions and conclusion
10. Scope for further study
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cabral, C.; Dhar, R.L. Ecotourism research in India: from an integrative literature review to a future research framework. J. Ecotourism 2019, 19, 23–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.-C.; Ku, C.-H.; Chen, C.-H. Social media analytics: Extracting and visualizing Hilton hotel ratings and reviews from TripAdvisor. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 48, 263–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, R. (2023). Proposing a Cyclic Model of Tourist Decision Making: A Review and Integration of Behavioural and Choice-Set Models. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(7), 1161-1186.
- Hoarau-Heemstra, H. , Wigger, K., Olsen, J., & James, L. (2023). Cruise tourism destinations: Practices, consequences and the road to sustainability. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 30, 100820.
- Huang, G.I.; Karl, M.; Wong, I.A.; Law, R. Tourism destination research from 2000 to 2020: A systematic narrative review in conjunction with bibliographic mapping analysis. Tour. Manag. 2022, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Coca-Stefaniak, J.A.; Nguyen, T.H.H.; Morrison, A.M. Sustainable tourist behavior: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Sustain. Dev. 2024, 32, 3356–3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lukanova, G. , & Ilieva, G. (2019). Robots, artificial intelligence, and service automation in hotels. In Robots, artificial intelligence, and service automation in travel, tourism and hospitality (pp. 157-183). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Ribeiro, H. , Fonseca Amaro, S., Seabra, C., & Luís Abrantes, J. (2014). Travel content creation: The influence of travellers’ innovativeness, involvement and use of social media. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 5(3), 245–260.
- James Cook University Singapore; Thirumaran, K. ; Raghav, M.; India, W.L.P.L. Luxury Tourism, Developing Destinations: Research Review and Trajectories. Asian J. Tour. Res. 2017, 2, 137–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).