Submitted:
19 November 2024
Posted:
20 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Microbial deterioration poses a significant threat to built heritage, particularly mural paintings, where traditional synthetic biocides can have adverse environmental and material impacts. This study evaluates the effectiveness of essential oils derived from four aromatic plants—thyme (Thymus mastichina L.), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.), pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium L.), and green lavender (Lavandula viridis L’Hér.)—as natural biocides against microorganisms isolated from mural paintings in the House of Moscadim, an 18th-century manor house in Portugal. Four microorganisms were isolated: two bacteria (Bacillus wiedmannii and Bacillus mobilis) and two fungi (Penicillium brevicompactum and Cladosporium cladosporioides). The antimicrobial activity of the essential oils was assessed using both direct contact and micro-atmosphere methods. Fennel essential oil exhibited the strongest antifungal activity against both fungal species, surpassing the efficacy of the commercial biocide Biotin T® in some cases. Pennyroyal and lavender essential oils also showed significant inhibitory effects. The micro-atmosphere method demonstrated the potential for non-invasive application of essential oils, preserving the integrity of delicate mural surfaces. These findings suggest that essential oils, particularly fennel oil, constitute a promising natural alternative to synthetic biocides for the sustainable conservation of cultural heritage. Further research is recommended to explore their long-term effects and to optimize application techniques.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Site Description
2.2. Microorganisms Isolation: Morphological Characterization and Molecular Identification
2.3. Essential Oils Obtention and Stock Biocide Solutions Preparation
2.3. Biocidal Potential Assessment
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Microorganism Isolation and Identification
3.2. Biocidal Potential Assessment
3.2.2. Antifungal Activity Assessed by Micro-Atmosphere Method
3.2.2. Antimicrobial Activity Assed by Contact Method
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Schröer, L.; Boon, N.; De Kock, T.; Cnudde, V. The Capabilities of Bacteria and Archaea to Alter Natural Building Stones – A Review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2021, 165, 105329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterflinger, K.; Pinzari, F. The Revenge of Time: Fungal Deterioration of Cultural Heritage with Particular Reference to Books, Paper and Parchment. Environ Microbiol 2012, 14, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crispim, C.A.; Gaylarde, C.C. Cyanobacteria and Biodeterioration of Cultural Heritage: A Review. Microb Ecol 2005, 49, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Russo, R.; Palla, F. Plant Essential Oils as Biocides in Sustainable Strategies for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, E.A.-E.; Mohamed, R.M. Bacterial Deterioration in the Limestone Minaret of Prince Muhammad and Suggested Treatment Methods, Akhmim, Egypt. Geomaterials 2022, 12, 37–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateus, D.M.R.; Silva, R.B.; Costa, F.M.C.; Coroado, J.P.F. Microbiological Diversity in the Unfinished Sacristy Building of the Convent of Christ, Tomar, and Evaluation of Its Biocide-Based Control. Conservar Património 2013, 17, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlo, E. Di; Chisesi, R.; Barresi, G.; Barbaro, S.; Lombardo, G.; Rotolo, V.; Sebastianelli, M.; Travagliato, G.; Palla, F. Fungi and Bacteria in Indoor Cultural Heritage Environments: Microbial-Related Risks for Artworks and Human Health. Environment and Ecology Research 2016, 4, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Resende, M.A. de Biodeterioração de Monumentos Históricos. In Microbiologia ambiental; Azevedo, J.L. de, Melo, I.S. de, Eds.; Embrapa Meio Ambiente: Jaguariúna, SP, 2008; pp. 501–520.
- Văcar, C.L.; Mircea, C.; Pârvu, M.; Podar, D. Diversity and Metabolic Activity of Fungi Causing Biodeterioration of Canvas Paintings. Journal of Fungi 2022, 8, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baptista Neto, J.A.; Gaylarde, C.; Beech, I.; J. Smith, B.; J. McAlister, J. Degradação de Gnaisse e Granito Em Fachadas de Edifícios Históricos No Centro Do Rio de Janeiro. Sistemas & Gestão 2020, 15, 80–90. [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Koestler, R.J.; Warscheid, T.; Katayama, Y.; Gu, J.-D. Microbial Deterioration and Sustainable Conservation of Stone Monuments and Buildings. Nat Sustain 2020, 3, 991–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterflinger, K.; Piñar, G. Microbial Deterioration of Cultural Heritage and Works of Art — Tilting at Windmills? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97, 9637–9646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shirakawa, M.A.; John, V.M.; Cincotto, M.Ai. Biodeterioração No Ambiente Construído. In Microbiologia Ambiental; Melo, I.S. de, Azevedo, J.L. de, Eds.; Embrapa Meio Ambiente: Jaguariúna, SP, 2008; pp. 478–499.
- Allsopp, D.; Seal, K.J.; Gaylarde, C.C. Introduction to Biodeterioration; Cambridge University Press, 2004; ISBN 9780521528870.
- Mateus, D.M.R.; Costa, F.M.C.; Triães, R.P. Essential Oils of Plants as Biocides Against Microorganisms Isolated from Portuguese Convent of Christ in Tomar. In; 2023; pp. 129–139.
- Cappitelli, F.; Abbruscato, P.; Foladori, P.; Zanardini, E.; Ranalli, G.; Principi, P.; Villa, F.; Polo, A.; Sorlini, C. Detection and Elimination of Cyanobacteria from Frescoes: The Case of the St. Brizio Chapel (Orvieto Cathedral, Italy). Microb Ecol 2009, 57, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palla, F.; Bruno, M.; Mercurio, F.; Tantillo, A.; Rotolo, V. Essential Oils as Natural Biocides in Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Molecules 2020, 25, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhatnagar, P.; Khan, A.A.; Jain, S.K.; Rai, M.K. Biodeterioration of Archaeological Monuments and Approach for Restoration. In Geomicrobiology; Jain, S.K., Khan, A.A., Rai, M.K., Eds.; CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group Science Publishers: USA, 2010; pp. 255–302. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Qian, Y.; Wu, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Gu, J.-D. Biofilms on Stone Monuments: Biodeterioration or Bioprotection? Trends Microbiol 2022, 30, 816–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappitelli, F.; Cattò, C.; Villa, F. The Control of Cultural Heritage Microbial Deterioration. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateus, D.M.R.; Ferraz, E.; Perna, V.; Sales, P.; Hipólito-Correia, V. Essential Oils and Extracts of Plants as Biocides against Microorganisms Isolated from the Ruins of the Roman City of Conímbriga (Portugal). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2024, 31, 40669–40677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reale, R.; Medeghini, L.; Botticelli, M. Stealing from Phytotherapy—Heritage Conservation with Essential Oils: A Review, from Remedy to Sustainable Restoration Product. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casorri, L.; Masciarelli, E.; Ficociello, B.; Ietto, F.; Incoronato, F.; Di Luigi, M.; Pacioni, G. Natural Substances as Biocides in the Fungi Treatment on Artistic Products to Protect the Environment and Health of Restoration Workers. Ital J Mycol 2023, 52, 89–111. [Google Scholar]
- Angane, M.; Swift, S.; Huang, K.; Butts, C.A.; Quek, S.Y. Essential Oils and Their Major Components: An Updated Review on Antimicrobial Activities, Mechanism of Action and Their Potential Application in the Food Industry. Foods 2022, 11, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atanasov, A.G.; Waltenberger, B.; Pferschy-Wenzig, E.-M.; Linder, T.; Wawrosch, C.; Uhrin, P.; Temml, V.; Wang, L.; Schwaiger, S.; Heiss, E.H.; et al. Discovery and Resupply of Pharmacologically Active Plant-Derived Natural Products: A Review. Biotechnol Adv 2015, 33, 1582–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaccardelli, M.; Roscigno, G.; Pane, C.; Celano, G.; Di Matteo, M.; Mainente, M.; Vuotto, A.; Mencherini, T.; Esposito, T.; Vitti, A.; et al. Essential Oils and Quality Composts Sourced by Recycling Vegetable Residues from the Aromatic Plant Supply Chain. Ind Crops Prod 2021, 162, 113255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verdier, T.; Coutand, M.; Bertron, A.; Roques, C. A Review of Indoor Microbial Growth across Building Materials and Sampling and Analysis Methods. Build Environ 2014, 80, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baptista, C.; Santos, L.; Emília Amaral, M.; Silva, L. Chemical Characterization of Essential Oils With a Biocide Base for Conservation and Restoration. KnE Materials Science 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balouiri, M.; Sadiki, M.; Ibnsouda, S.K. Methods for in Vitro Evaluating Antimicrobial Activity: A Review. J Pharm Anal 2016, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stupar, M.; Grbić, M.Lj.; Džamić, A.; Unković, N.; Ristić, M.; Jelikić, A.; Vukojević, J. Antifungal Activity of Selected Essential Oils and Biocide Benzalkonium Chloride against the Fungi Isolated from Cultural Heritage Objects. South African Journal of Botany 2014, 93, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paolino, B.; Sorrentino, M.C.; Troisi, J.; Delli Carri, M.; Kiselev, P.; Raimondo, R.; Lahoz, E.; Pacifico, S. Lavandula Angustifolia Mill. for a Suitable Non-Invasive Treatment against Fungal Colonization on Organic-Media Cultural Heritage. Herit Sci 2024, 12, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trovão, J.; Portugal, A. Current Knowledge on the Fungal Degradation Abilities Profiled through Biodeteriorative Plate Essays. Applied Sciences 2021, 11, 4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isola, D.; Bartoli, F.; Casanova Municchia, A.; Lee, H.J.; Jeong, S.H.; Chung, Y.J.; Caneva, G. Green Biocides for the Conservation of Hypogeal Mural Paintings Raised from Western and Eastern Traditions: Evaluation of Interference on Pigments and Substrata and Multifactor Parameters Affecting Their Activity. J Cult Herit 2023, 61, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateus, D.M.R.; Ferraz, E.; Perna, V.; Sales, P.; Hipólito-Correia, V. Essential Oils and Extracts of Plants as Biocides against Microorganisms Isolated from the Ruins of the Roman City of Conímbriga (Portugal). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023, 31, 40669–40677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zerhouni, K.; Abbouni, B.; Kanoun, K.; Daouadji, K.L.; Tifrit, A.; Benahmed, M.; Chaouche, T.M. Isolation and Identification of Low Density Polythene-Degrading Bacteria from Soil of North West of Algeria. South Asian Journal of Experimental Biology 2019, 8, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ünlü-Yokuş, Y.; Göksay-Kadaifçiler, D.; Ilhan-Sungur, E. Amylolytic and Proteolytic Bacteria in Deteriorated Paper-Based Historical Manuscripts. J Sci Ind Res (India) 2024, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, C.; Fang, Z.; Li, X.; Liu, X. Identification of Bacterial Communities Involved in Bioweathering Crusts on Limestone Sculptures of the Longmen Grottoes. Coatings 2023, 13, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nigro, L.; Mura, F.; Toti, M.P.; Cirigliano, A.; Rinaldi, T. Carbonatogenic Bacteria on the ‘Motya Charioteer’ Sculpture. J Cult Herit 2022, 57, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalemba, D.; Kunicka, A. Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties of Essential Oils. Curr Med Chem 2003, 10, 813–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccaglia, R.; Marotti, M.; Giovanelli, E.; Deans, S.G.; Eaglesham, E. Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties of Mediterranean Aromatic Plants. Ind Crops Prod 1993, 2, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mota, A.S.; Martins, M.R.; Arantes, S.; Lopes, V.R.; Bettencourt, E.; Pombal, S.; Gomes, A.C.; Silva, L.A. Antimicrobial Activity and Chemical Composition of the Essential Oils of Portuguese Foeniculum Vulgare Fruits. Nat Prod Commun 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, M.; Lopes, A.C.; Vaz, F.; Filipe, M.; Alves, G.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Coutinho, P.; Araujo, A.R.T.S. Thymus Mastichina: Composition and Biological Properties with a Focus on Antimicrobial Activity. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasa, H.; Onar, H.Ç.; Yusufoglu, A.S. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil of Mentha Pulegium L. from Bodrum, Turkey. Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants 2012, 15, 1040–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouakouak, H.; Chohra, M.; Denane, M. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oil of <I>Mentha Pulegium</I> L, South East of Algeria. International Letters of Natural Sciences 2015, 39, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamini, Y.; Sefidkon, F.; Pourmortazavi, S.M. Comparison of Essential Oil Composition of Iranian Fennel (Foeniculum Vulgare) Obtained by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction and Hydrodistillation Methods. Flavour Fragr J 2002, 17, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fidanza, M.R.; Caneva, G. Natural Biocides for the Conservation of Stone Cultural Heritage: A Review. J Cult Herit 2019, 38, 271–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Biocide | Penicillium brevicompactum | Cladosporium cladosporioides | ||||||
| Radius ± CI (cm) |
HS | G.R (cm/day) |
C.D. | Radius ± CI (cm) |
HS | G.R (cm/day) |
C.D. | |
| Fennel | 0.12 ± 0.03 | a | 0.031 | 0.92 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | a, b | 0.017 | 0.86 |
| Lavender | 0.30 ± 0.03 | d | 0.096 | 0.99 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | d, e, f | 0.053 | 0.96 |
| Pennyroyal | 0.21 ± 0.04 | a, b, c | 0.088 | 0.98 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | b, c | 0.034 | 0.97 |
| Thyme | 0.24 ± 0.03 | b, c, d | 0.101 | 0.98 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | g, h, i | 0.091 | 0.99 |
| SDS | 0.45 ± 0.03 | f | 0.15 | 0.97 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | l, m | 0.139 | 0.99 |
| Mix | 0.20 ± 0.03 | a, b, c | 0.09 | 0.93 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | c, d, e | 0.058 | 0.97 |
| Biotin T® | 0.32 ± 0.07 | d, e | 0.109 | 0.99 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | i, j | 0.115 | 1.00 |
| Biocide |
Penicillium brevicompactum |
Cladosporium Cladosporioides |
Bacillus wiedmannii |
Bacillus mobilis |
||||
|
Radius ± CI (cm) |
HS |
Radius ± CI (cm) |
HS |
Radius ± CI (cm) |
HS |
Radius ± CI (cm) |
HS | |
| Fennel | 2.83 ± 0.16* | c | 3.00 ± 0.09* | b, c | 1.74 ± 0.23 | b,c | 1.41 ± 0.20 | c |
| Lavender | N.D. | - | N.D. | - | 1.49 ± 0.23 | b | 0.83 ± 0.06 | b |
| Pennyroyal | 1.31 ± 0.13 | a | 2.80 ± 0.05* | b | 0.82 ± 0.11 | a | 0.51 ± 0.05 | a |
| Thyme | N.D. | - | 1.51 ± 0.11 | a | 0.83 ± 0.11 | a | 0.68 ± 0.08 | a, b |
| Mixture | 2.81 ± 0.20 | c | 3.16 ± 0.24 | c | 0.96 ± 0.11 | a | 0.77 ± 0.03 | b |
| Biotin T® | 2.23 ± 0.11 | b | 2.92 ± 0.04 | b,c | 2.01 ± 0.15 | c | 1.53 ± 0.06 | c |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).