Submitted:
06 November 2024
Posted:
08 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. The Origin of Intuition in Cognitive Evolution
1.2. Neuroscience and Embodied Cognition in Intuitive Communication
1.3. The Uncanny Valley Challenge and Social Acceptance of SAR
2. Theoretical Foundations and Context
2.1. ToM and HRI
2.2. Evolutionary Empathy and Shared Knowledge
2.3. Multisensory Sensors and Holistic Approach
3. Methodology
3.1. Design of Intuitive Learning Algorithms in SAR
3.2. Experiment and Analysis of Multisensory Interaction in SAR
- Eye movement and facial expression monitoring: using facial recognition software inspired by Ekman’s Facial Action Coding System (FACS), SAR detects micro-expressions in real-time, adjusting responses accordingly [2]. This ability not only improves interaction quality but enhances perceived empathy by reacting to nuanced facial cues [1].
- Tactile sensors for complex emotional responses: advanced tactile sensors allow SAR to recognize and respond to physical stimuli such as handshakes or touches, which are integral to human social bonding [6]. This multisensory feedback enhances the interaction by incorporating tactile responsiveness, thereby enriching the overall communication experience [15].
- Neural synchronization via EEG: electroencephalography (EEG) is used to track users' brainwaves during interactions with SAR, particularly focusing on ALPHA, BETA, and GAMMA waves. Previous studies demonstrate that ALPHA waves indicate relaxation, while BETA and GAMMA waves are associated with concentration and cognitive engagement, both of which are critical for positive HRI experiences [7,11].
Discussion
Conclusions
References
- Bartlett, M. S., Hager, J. C., Ekman, P., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2003). Measuring facial expressions by computer image analysis. Psychophysiology, 36(2), 253-263. [CrossRef]
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
- Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17(16), R724-R732. [CrossRef]
- Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 143-166. [CrossRef]
- Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679-704.
- Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29, 169-195. [CrossRef]
- Gallese, V. (2001). The 'Shared Manifold' Hypothesis: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 33-50.
- Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451-482.
- de Waal, F. B. M. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279-300.
- Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.
- Katsyri, J., Forger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., & Takala, T. (2015). A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: Support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 390. [CrossRef]
- LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
- Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 167-175.
- Diani, S., & Lombardo, C. (2020). The paradigm-shift toward the next generation of drugs. Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, 3, 154-160.
- MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 297-337. [CrossRef]
- Meltzoff, A. N. (2007). 'Like me': A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10(1), 126-134.
- Picard, R. W. (2000). Affective Computing. MIT Press.
- Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
- Scherer, K. R. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40(1), 227-256. [CrossRef]
- Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press.
- Vernon, D., Metta, G., & Sandini, G. (2007). A survey of artificial cognitive systems: Implications for the autonomous development of mental capabilities in computational agents. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(2), 151-180. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).