Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Origin and function of bitumen coated torpedo jars from the Sasanian to early Islamic period fort of Fulayj in Oman

Submitted:

25 October 2024

Posted:

29 October 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Geochemical and isotopic analysis of the bitumen lining of torpedo jar sherds from the Sasanian to early Islamic period fort of Fulayj in Oman confirms the presence of two distinct compositional categories that can be matched to contemporary sources in different areas of southwest Iran. It appears that the bitumen used to line jars was extracted from different geographic areas, hinting at the existence of multiple production locations for this vessel class. On the function of the jars, organic residue analysis provides a positive identification of biomarkers associated with the storage and transport of red wine. These results provide the first published confirmation of the long suspected association between torpedo jars and wine transportation from the core urbanised zone of the Sasanian and early Islamic imperial heartlands towards the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean maritime sphere. The results have added significance as the samples are derived from relatively accurately dated archaeological contexts spanning the period before and after the Islamic conquest.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

A sample of 15 sherds of bitumen coated torpedo jars have been selected for analysis from the late Sasanian to early Islamic period fort of Fulayj in Oman. Torpedo jars form a distinctive class of handless transport container vessels with a narrow mouth and a pointed base coated with a waterproof lining. They are found very widely distributed across the Mesopotamian plain, southern Iran and along the Persian Gulf and western Indian Ocean littoral. Isolated examples are also attested from shipwreck assemblages in Southeast Asia. Inconviently, their chronology is broad spanning the period from at least the 3rd to 9th centuries CE with little obvious stylistic, morphological or technical change. Recent research on the composition of both the ceramic fabric and bitumen lining provides evidence for the production of this class within the general area of southern Iraq and/or southwest Iran [1,2,3,4]. The potential to further refine our knowledge of the production location(s) of this class remains open to investigation. The current contribution adds to this body of research by analysing samples from securely dated contexts from the fort of Fulayj in Oman.

2. Archaeological Context

Fulayj is the site of a small c. 30 × 30m, heavily defended, square fortification with projecting ‘U’ shaped corner and entrance flanking towers and a single entranceway facing to the east. It was built with a thick, neatly constructed stone base most likely supporting a much more substantial mudbrick superstructure. Radiocarbon dating indicates that the fort was built in the late pre-Islamic period sometime between the early 5th and mid-6th century CE [5]. The latest results of excavation and dating indicate that there was a brief horizon of related activity in the same location preceding the fort construction. The location of the site is c. 30km southwest of the major Indian Ocean emporium of Sohar, which may already have attained some prominence before the Islamic conquest. The dating of the fort, its clear architectural links with similar small Late Antique fortlets across the Middle East, and its expert construction all strongly suggest that it was built by an external military force, which we can associate historically with the projection of Sasanian imperial power and the settlement of a Persian population on the Batinah during the late Sasanian period [6]. It is not clear if this was a long-lived military occupation. Finds within the fort are generally scarce. Significantly, the building underwent certain modifications and continued to be occupied during the first century following the Islamic conquest [7]. At this time mudbrick rooms were inserted into one corner of the fort and the defensive aspect of the gateway was modified. It is possible that the site took on a less overtly military function. Torpedo jar samples derive from contexts spanning both the earlier and later occupation.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Samples

Fifteen samples of bitumen coating the interior face of potsherds were isolated by scraping the surface with a scalpel (Table 1). Four examples of the samples are presented in Figure 1. They illustrate different sitiations with variable crusts of bitumen. No bitumen occurs on the exterior face of the potsherds.

3. Analytical Procedures

3.2.1. Bitumen Analysis 

All archaeological and geological bituminous samples were subjected to the same analytical procedure at GeoMark Research Ltd. Detailed procedures have been described in previous papers [3,8].

3.2.2. Wine Detection 

The LC-MS/MS analysis follows a new analytical technique that targets ancient wine biomarkers developed at the UCLA Pasarow Mass Spectrometry Laboratory) (Elezi et al. in preparation), [9].
The archaeological samples were pulverized in a pestle and mortar, and 2 g of pottery powder was treated with 5 mL of Methanol/DI Water/Formic Acid mixture 50:50:0.1 (v/v/v) in a glass test tube. The samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 2000 xg for 15 min, and the supernatants were transferred into new tubes. The extraction procedure was repeated by adding 3 mL of the mixture, and the supernatants were pulled into the new tubes. 100 pmoles of Daidzin solution in Ethanol were added as an internal standard for potential quantification analysis, and then the samples were dried in a vacuum concentrator for 4 hours. The dried samples were resuspended in 100 μl of Methanol/Water/Formic Acid (95:5:01) (v/v/v), vortexed thoroughly, and centrifuged at 2000 xg for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred to HPLC polypropylene vials, and 25 μl was injected for analysis.
A targeted Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed on a Linear Ion Trap LTQ-XL (Thermo Scientific) mass spectrometer coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 300 HPLC system (Thermo Scientific) through a reversed-phase GL Science analytical column (Inert Sustain 2 μm, Phenyl 150 x 2.1 mm). The instrument was optimized in positive ion mode monitoring transitions for Malvidine 3-glucoside (Mv3g) 493-331 m/z, Vitisin A (VA) 561-399 m/z, Vitisin B (VB) 517-355 m/z, and Daidzin (DA) 417-255 m/z). The mobile phase consisted of A (99.9:0.1 v/v Water/Formic Acid) and B (99.9:0.1 v/v Acetonitrile/Formic Acid). The HPLC method utilized the linear gradient mixture of eluents A and B to elute the targeted compounds (min/%B: 0/5, 5/5, 12/40, 26/75, 28/5, 40/The m/z of a fragment ion from each compound was monitored at a specific LC retention time to ensure their specificity and accurate identification.

4. Results

4.1. Gross Composition

Gross composition data are listed in Table 2 Extractable Organic matter in dichloromethane (EO % by weight/sample), which represents the amount of bitumen, ranges between 9.8 and 51% by weight with an average value of 37.9%. All samples are rather rich in bitumen.
A plot of % sat (saturated hydrocarbons) vs. % aro (aromatic hydrocarbosn) vs. % polars (= resins + asphaltenes) in Figure 2, shows that most samples are extremely rich in polars. One sample (No. 3462) is slightly different for enriched in hydrocarbons (9.3 %).
A plot of % sat + aro vs. % resins (NSO’s) vs. % asphaltenes shows a diversified situation with samples extremely rich in asphaltenes (more than 80%) and some others (No. 3462, 3606 and 3451) in which resins are higher, between 18.6 and 37.1 %. The compositions of archaeological samples characterized by an enrichment in asphaltenes has been reported in many publications [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].

4.2. Isotope Data

Carbon and hydrogen isotopes are presented in Table 3 The plot of 13Csat vs. 13Caro and 13CNSO vs. 13Casp in Figure 3, clearly shows that there is at least two main groups of bitumen, group one with 13Casp between -27.1 and -26.8 ‰/VPDB and group two with 13Casp between -28.3 and -27.2 ‰/VPDB. Comparison of these values with data acquired on oil seeps from Iran (Figure 4) confirms the occurrence of two main group of samples originating from different geographical locations. Group one corresponds to samples originating mainly from Khuzestan and Bushehr, group two to samples from Kermanshah, Ilam, and Lorestan.
The plot of Dasp vsDNSO in Figure 5a does not show any relationship between D values and their group, defined by their carbon isotope ratios. This feature is not surprising for these parameters are not source dependant but reflects oxidation intensities among bitumens [25]. Comparison of Fulayj data (Figure 5a) with those of 15 oil seeps from Iran (Figure 5b) shows that the Fulayj asphaltenes are generally more oxidized than those of oil seeps. Surprisingly and not explained, resins (NSO) of Fulayj are comparable to those of oil seeps of Iran.

4.3. Steranes and Terpanes

Steranes and terpanes were used as biomarkers to characterize the source of bitumen. Mass fragmentograms of terpanes (m/z 191) and steranes (m/z 217) of two archaeological samples (No. 3463 and No. 3460) are reproduced in Figure Terpanes of the No. 3463 sample show a complete pattern of the hopane family (C28 H to C35 H) with a high Tm/Ts ratio, a rather high gammacerane, almost no tricycloplyprenanes. Their steranes is dominated by regular steranes which are slightly biodegraded. Terpanes from No. 3460 show also the complete hopane family with occurrence of tricyclopolyprenanes (28/3 and 29/3), a low gammacerane and the occurrence of 18(H)-oleanane which reflects the contribution of the Pabdeh Tertiary formation in the source rocks which have produced this type of bitumen. One should notice that the occurrence of 18(H)-oleanane is matching with samples having 13C of asphaltenes between -26 and -27 ‰/VPDB (Figure 6 and Figure 7).
The plot of some characteristic ratios namely Ts/Tm vs.13C of asphaltenes (Figure 7), Ts/Tm vs. Diasteranes/Regular steranes and Ts/Tm vs. Gammacerane/C31 RHopane confirms the occurrence of at least two bitumen families. The first one (No. 3458, 3459, 3460, 3461, 3464, 3602 and 3606) corresponds to bitumen containing 18(H)-oleanane, high diasteranes/regular steranes, high Ts/Tm ratio, low gammacerane/C31 RHopane and occurrence of tricyclic terpanes. This family was generated from a source rock (likely the Eocene-Oligocene Pabdeh formation) in which the organic matter has a vegetal contribution, and is deposited in a marine environment under anaerobic conditions [26]. The second family (No. 3462, 3463, 3465, 3603, 3604, 3605, 3607, 3608) has a low Ts/Tm ratio, mainly regular steranes , a high gammacerane/C31 Rhopane and originates likely from the Albian-Aptian Khazdumi formation deposited in a very anoxic hypersaline marine environment [27,28].
Figure 9. Plot of 18α(H)-oleanane / C30αβHopane vs. δ13Casp (‰ / VPDB) in oil seeps from different provinces of Iran.
Figure 9. Plot of 18α(H)-oleanane / C30αβHopane vs. δ13Casp (‰ / VPDB) in oil seeps from different provinces of Iran.
Preprints 137484 g009
Comparison of Fulayj data to those of oil seeps and solid bitumen analyzed in the different provinces of Iran shows that the first group matches data from natural asphalts from Karmanshah and Lorestan-Illam provinces whereas the second group is not matching the present day acquired data on oil seeps from Lorestan-Illam-Khuzestan-Busher-Fars and Hormozgan provinces. Utilization of data on archaeological sites as proxis in Figure 10, reveals that data from Fulayj are matching data from Susa in Khuzestan and Chogah Ahowan in Ilam.
Plot of data on steranes in Figure 11 discriminates again the two groups of samples. Samples with 18(H)-oleanane are more biodegraded than samples without 18(H)-oleanane as indicated by the reduced C27 steranes . Samples without 18(H)-oleanane have less C28 steranes as is often the case in samples with high gammacerane which display a V-pattern (C28<C27 and C29). Interesting, samples with 18(H)-oleanane shows the selective removal of the C29R sterane, a characteristic biodegradation effects seen elsewhere in archaeological samples: at Kuriki Höyük in Turkey, Qala’t al Bahrain and Saar in Bahrain, Hummal in Syria, Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka [1,29,30,31]. This selective biodegradation of the biological configuration of steranes has been observed in crude oils at depth [32] and has been reproduced in 15 days under laboratory conditions using grams-positive strains belonging to Nocardia and Arthrobacter genera [33,34].

4.5. Identification of Wine

In an ongoing research program conducted by Gazmend Elezi at the UCLA Pasarow Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, a targeted LC-MS/MS assay was developed to detect wine residues [9]. The method targeted wine biomarkers such as Malvidine 3-glucoside (Mv3g), Vitisin A (VA), and Vitisin B (VB) monitoring transitions from precursors (Mv3g 493 m/z, VA 561 m/z, VB 517 m/z) to product ions (OE, 331 m/z, VA 339 m/z VB 355 m/z) (Figure 12). These molecules are characteristics of red wine [35,36].
Positive answers were recorded for 5 samples: 3 (Nos 3459, 3460 and 3464) with bitumen containing 18(H)-oleanane and 2 (Nos 3453 and 3465) with bitumen without 18(H)-oleanane (Table 4, Figure 13). Sample No. 3459 comes from within a room securely dated to the 7th century AD, seemingly directly following the conversion to Islam.
Figure 14. LC-MS/MS chromatogram of the archaeological sample 3464 depicting the signals of the monitored precursor-product ion transitions for the targeted compounds and the internal standard.
Figure 14. LC-MS/MS chromatogram of the archaeological sample 3464 depicting the signals of the monitored precursor-product ion transitions for the targeted compounds and the internal standard.
Preprints 137484 g013

5. Conclusions

Fifteen samples of bitumen coated torpedo jars have revealed two main compositional groups originating in southwest Iran, one from the Karmanshah- Lorestan provinces and the other from the Khuzestan-Illam provinces. Five of these potsherds were identified as wine containers on the basis of specific biomarkers associated with red wine. The interpretation of this relatively small sample is complicated. Both bitumen composition groups are associated with the detected traces of wine. This suggests a consistent function regardless of the location of production. Of course, an important caveat here is that the origin of the bitumen and location of pottery production may not necessarily have been the same. Chronologically, the samples are associated with different parts of the occupation sequence (Table 1), the dating of which is constrained by radiocarbon dating evidence. Not all of this is fully published, but the outline can be summarised. One of the sherds that provided a positive identification for the presence of wine comes from Phase 2a (No. 3460). This is a thin but particularly rich occupation horizon that predates the construction of the fort indicating some kind of earlier activity. The absolute dating evidence is broad but delimited within the Sasanian period from the c. mid-3rd to mid-6th century CE. It would be surprising if the dating is in fact very much earlier than the construction of the fort. A second fragment (No. 3465) belongs to Phase 2c, which comprises the ephemeral occupation directly connected with the use of the fort sometime between the early 5th to mid-6th century CE. A third sample (No. 3459) belongs to the re-occupation of the fort and the modification of its interior with the insertion of a domestic mudbrick buiding in Phase 3, which can be dated between the late 6th to late 7th century certainly covering the first decades of the Islamic transition. The remaining samples are associated with the gradual collapse of the fortification and we assume that these fragments are residual from any part of the earlier occupation. In terms of differing sources of bitumen composition, there does not appear to be any strong chronological correlation. One should be cautious in drawing any firm conclusions from this limited dataset. What the results do seem to point to is both a consitency in the pattern of usage of this vessel class through time, and to the enduring acquisition of bitumen from multiple sources. This might plausibly be connected with alternative manufacturing centers and the distribution of different regional varieties of wine as outlined in the contemporary historigraphy. These features require further systematic investigation at scale.

Acknowledgments

The Fulayj Fort Project was co-directed by Seth Priestman, Nasser al-Jahwari, Eve MacDonald and Derek Kennet. Permission to conduct analysis of the samples was kindly facilitated by the Ministry of Heritage and Tourism of the Sultanate of Oman and Sultan Qaboos University. We thank the many specialists who contributed to the archaeological interpretation of the site that underpins the results that are reported here.

References

  1. Stern, B.; Connan, J.; Blakelock, E.; Jackman, R.; Coningham, R.A.E.; Heron, C. From Susa to Anuradhapura: reconstructing aspects of trade and exchange in bitumen-coated ceramic vessels between Iran and Sri Lanka in the Third to the Ninth centuries AD. Archaeometry 2008, 50, 409–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Connan, J.; Priestman, S.; Vosmer, T.; Komoot, A.; Tofighian, H.; Ghorbani, B.; Engel, M.H.; Zumberge, A.; Van de Velde, T. Geochemical analysis of bitumen from West Asian torpedo jars from the c. 8th century Phanom-Surin shipwreck in Thailand. Journal of Archaeological Science 2020, 117, 105111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Connan, J.; Engel, M.H.; Jackson, R.; Priestman, S.; Vosmer, T.; Zumberge, A. Geochemical Analysis of Two Samples of Bitumen from Jars Discovered on Muhut and Masirah Islands (Oman). Separations 2021, 8, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tomber, R.; Spataro, M.; Priestman, S. Early Islamic Torpedo Jars from Siraf: Scientific Analyses of the Clay Fabric and Source of Indian Ocean Transport Containers. Iran 2022, 60, 240–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Priestman, S.; al-Jahwari, N.; MacDonald, E.; Kennet, D.; Alzeidi, K.; Andrews, M.; Dabrowski, V.; Kenkadze, V.; MacDonald, R.; Mamalashvili, T.; Al-Maqbali, I.; Naskidashvili, D.; Rossi, D. Fulayj: A Sasanian to Early Islamic Fort in the Sohar Hinterland. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 2023, 52, 291–304. [Google Scholar]
  6. al-Jahwari, N. , Kennet, D. Priestman, S., Sauer, E. Fulayj: A Late Sasanian Fort on the Arabian Coast. Antiquity 2018, 92, 724–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Priestman, S.M.N. The archaeology of Early Islam in Oman: Recent Discoveries from Fulayj on the Batinah. The Anglo-Omani Society Review 2019, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  8. Connan, J.; Adelsberger, K.A.; Engel, M.; Zumberge, A. Bitumens from Tell Yarmuth (Israel) from 2800 BCE to 1100 BCE : A unique case history for the study of degradation effects on the Dead Sea bitumen. Organic Geochemistry 2022, 168, 104392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elezi, G.; H Barnard, H. , Whitelegge, J. Novel method for the detection of ancient wine biomarkers in archaeological pottery, In preparation.
  10. Forbes, R.J. Studies in Ancient Technology. Volume 1: Bitumen and Petroleum in Antiquity. 1955, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
  11. Marschner, R.F.; Wright, H.T. Asphalt from Middle Eastern Archaeological Sites. Archaeological Chemistry 1, Advances in Chemistry Series, 1978, Chicago, 97-112.
  12. Connan, J. Le bitume dans l’Antiquité. 2012, Arles: Errance, Actes Sud.
  13. Connan, J.; Nissenbaum, A.; Dessort, D. Molecular archaeology: Export of Dead Sea asphalt to Canaan and Egypt in the Chalcolithic-Early Bronze Age (4th-3rd millennium BC). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 1992, 56, 2743–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Connan, J.; Nishiaki, Y. The bituminous mixtures of Tell Kosak Shamali on the Upper Euphrates (Syria) from the Early Ubaid to the Post Ubaid: Composition of mixtures and origin of bitumen. In: Nishiaki, Y., Matsutani, T. (Eds.), Tell Kosak Shamali-The Archaeological Investigations on the Upper Euphrates, Syria, Chalcolithic Technology and Subsistence. The University Museum and The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 2003, Vol.II, Chapter 18, pp. 283–306.
  15. Connan, J.; Nissenbaum, A.; Imbus, K.; Zumberge, J.; Macko, S. Asphalt in iron age excavations from the Philistine Tel Miqne-Ekron city (Israel) : Origin and trade routes. Organic Geochemistry 2006, 37, 1768–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Connan, J.; Carter, R. A geochemical study of bituminous mixtures from Failaka and Umm an-Namel (Kuwait), from the Early Dilmun to the Early Islamic period. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 2007, 18, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Connan, J.; Kavak, O.; Sağlamtimur, H.; Engel, M.; Zumberge, A.; Zumberge, J. A geochemical study of bitumen residues on ceramics excavated from Early Bronze graves (3000-2900 BCE) at Başur Höyük in SE Turkey. Organic Geochemistry 2018, 115, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Connan, J.; Adelsberger, K.A.; Engels, M.H.; Zumberge, A. Bitumens from Tell Yarmuth (Israel) form 2800 BCE to 1100 BCE: A unique case history for the study of degradation effects on the Dead Sea bitumen. Organic Geochemistry 2022, 168, 104392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nissenbaum, A.; Connan, J. Application of organic geochemistry to the study of Dead Sea asphalt in archaeological sites from Israel and Egypt. In: Pike, S., Gitin, S. (Eds.), The Practical Impact of Science on Near Eastern and Aegean Archaeology., Wiener laboratory Publication, 3, 1999, Archetype Publications Ltd, London, 91-98.
  20. Schwartz, M.; Hollander, D. The Uruk expansion as dynamic process: A reconstruction of Middle to Late Uruk exchange patterns from bulk isotope analyses of bitumen artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2016, 7, 884–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schwartz, M.; Hollander, D.; Stein, G.J. Reconstructing Mesopotamian exchange networks in the 4th millenium BC: geochemical and archaeological analyses of bitumen artifacts from Hacinebi Tepe, Turkey. Paléorient 2000, 25, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brown, K.; Connan, J.; Poister, K.M.; Vellanoweth, R.L.; Zumberge, J.; Engel, M.H. Sourcing archaeological asphaltum (bitumen) from the California Channel Islands to submarine seeps. Journal of Archaeological Science 2014, 43, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Daneels, A.; Romo de Vivar-Romo, A.; Linares-Jurado, A.; Reyes-Lezama, M.; Tapia-Mendoza, E.; Morales-Puente, P.; Cienfuegos-Alvarado, E.; Otero-Trujano, F.J. Chemical analysis of bitumen paint on classic period Central Veracruz ceramics, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2018, 17, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wendt, C.J.; Lu, S.-T. Sourcing archaeological bitumen in the Olmec region. Journal of Archaeological Science 2006, 33, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Charrié-Duhaut, A.; Lemoine, S.; Adam, P.; Connan, J.; Albrecht, P. Abiotic oxidation of bitumens under natural conditions. Org.Geochem. 2000, 31, 977–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ashkan, S.A.M. Geochimie organique des roches mères et des huiles du basin de Zagros (Iran). Thèse, Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy I, 1998.
  27. Moldowan, J.M.; Seifert, W.K.; Gallegos, E.J. Relationship between petroleum composition and depositional environment of petroleum source rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 1985, 69, 1255–1268. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fu, J.; Sheng, G.; Peng, P.; Brassell, S.C.; Eglinton, G.; Jigang, J. Peculiarities of salt lake sediments as potential source rocks in China. Organic Geochemisty 1986, 10, 119–1126. [Google Scholar]
  29. Connan, J. , Genç, E., Kavak, O., Engel, M.H., Zumberge, A. Geochemistry and origin of bituminous samples of Kuriki Höyük (SE Turkey) from 4000 BCE to 200 CE: comparison with Kavuşan Höyük, Hakemi Use and Salat Tepe. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2022, 41, 103348. [Google Scholar]
  30. Connan, J. , Lombard, P., Killick, R., Højlund, F., Salles, J.F., Kalaf; A.The archaeological bitumen of Bahrain from the early Dilmun period (c. 2200 BC) to the sixteenth century AD: a problem of source and trade. Arab. Archeol.Epigr 1998, 9, 141–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boëda, E. , Connan, J., Muhesen, S. Bitumen as hafting material on Middle Paleolithic artefacts from the El Kown Basin, Syria. In: Akazawa, T., Aoki, K., Bar Yosef, O. (Eds.), Neanderthals and Modern Humans in Western Asia, Plenum, New York, 1998, pp.181-204.
  32. 32 Seifert, W. , Moldowan, M., Demaison, G., Source correlation of biodegraded oils. Org.Geochem. 1984, 6, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chosson, P.; Connan, J.; Dessort, D.; Lanau, C. In vitro biodegradation of steranes and terpanes: a clue to understanding geological situations. In Albrecht P., Moldowan, M., Philp, P. (Eds.). Biological markers in sediments and petroleum, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1991a, pp.320-349.
  34. Chosson, P.; Lanau, C.; Connan, J.; Dessort, D. Biodegradation of refractory hydrocarbons from petroleum under laboratory conditions. Nature 1991, 351, 640–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Morata, A. , Calderón, F. , González, M. C., Gómez-Cordovés, M.C., Suárez., J.A. “Formation of the Highly Stable Pyranoanthocyanins (Vitisins A and B) in Red Wines by the Addition of Pyruvic Acid and Acetaldehyde.”. Food Chemistry 2007, 100, 1144–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Freitas, V. , Mateus., N. Formation of pyranoanthocyanins in red wines:
a new and diverse class of anthocyanin derivatives. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 401, 1463–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Picture of four samples of Fulayj showing various aspects of the bitumen coating the interior face of potsherds.
Figure 1. Picture of four samples of Fulayj showing various aspects of the bitumen coating the interior face of potsherds.
Preprints 137484 g001
Figure 2. Gross composition of the dichloromethane extract in two ternary diagrams: % saturates vs. % aromatics vs. % polars and % sat + aro vs. % resins vs. % asphaltenes.
Figure 2. Gross composition of the dichloromethane extract in two ternary diagrams: % saturates vs. % aromatics vs. % polars and % sat + aro vs. % resins vs. % asphaltenes.
Preprints 137484 g002
Figure 3. Plot of 13C (‰ / VPDB) of aromatics vs. 13C (‰ / VPDB) of saturates and 13C (‰ / VPDB) of asphaltenes vs. 13C (‰ / VPDB) of NSO for the Fulayj samples.
Figure 3. Plot of 13C (‰ / VPDB) of aromatics vs. 13C (‰ / VPDB) of saturates and 13C (‰ / VPDB) of asphaltenes vs. 13C (‰ / VPDB) of NSO for the Fulayj samples.
Preprints 137484 g003
Figure 4. Plot of 13C (‰ / VPDB) of aromatics vs. 13C (‰ / VPDB) of saturates and 13C (‰ / VPDB) of asphaltenes vs. 13C of NSO for the oil seeps of Iran: Comparison with the Fulayj ‘s data.
Figure 4. Plot of 13C (‰ / VPDB) of aromatics vs. 13C (‰ / VPDB) of saturates and 13C (‰ / VPDB) of asphaltenes vs. 13C of NSO for the oil seeps of Iran: Comparison with the Fulayj ‘s data.
Preprints 137484 g004
Figure 5. Plot of the D (‰ / VSMOW) of asphaltenes vs. D (‰ / VSMOW) of NSO. a) data on Fulayj. b) data on 15 oil seeps from Iran.
Figure 5. Plot of the D (‰ / VSMOW) of asphaltenes vs. D (‰ / VSMOW) of NSO. a) data on Fulayj. b) data on 15 oil seeps from Iran.
Preprints 137484 g005
Figure 6. Mass fragmentograms of steranes (m/z 217) and terpanes (m/z 191) with the plot of δ13Casp vs. δ13CNSO : comparison of the sample No.3643 without 18α(H)-oleanane to the sample No.3460 with 18α(H)-oleanane.
Figure 6. Mass fragmentograms of steranes (m/z 217) and terpanes (m/z 191) with the plot of δ13Casp vs. δ13CNSO : comparison of the sample No.3643 without 18α(H)-oleanane to the sample No.3460 with 18α(H)-oleanane.
Preprints 137484 g006
Figure 7. Plot of 18α(H)-oleanane / C30αβHopane vs. δ13Casp (‰ / VPDB) and Ts/Tm vs. δ13Casp (‰ / VPDB) with the Fulayj samples.
Figure 7. Plot of 18α(H)-oleanane / C30αβHopane vs. δ13Casp (‰ / VPDB) and Ts/Tm vs. δ13Casp (‰ / VPDB) with the Fulayj samples.
Preprints 137484 g007
Figure 8. Plot of Ts/Tm vs. Diasteranes/Regular steranes and Ts/Tm vs. Gammacerane/ C31αβRHopane with the samples of Fulayj.
Figure 8. Plot of Ts/Tm vs. Diasteranes/Regular steranes and Ts/Tm vs. Gammacerane/ C31αβRHopane with the samples of Fulayj.
Preprints 137484 g008
Figure 10. Plot of 18(H)-oleanane / C30 Hopane vs. 13Casp (‰ / VPDB) in bitumen from archaeological sites of Iran.
Figure 10. Plot of 18(H)-oleanane / C30 Hopane vs. 13Casp (‰ / VPDB) in bitumen from archaeological sites of Iran.
Preprints 137484 g010
Figure 11. Plot of αββsteranes in a ternary diagram : %C27 vs. %C28 vs. %C29 and plot of C29αββS/C29αααR vs. C29αααS/C29αααR: comparison of samples with (red circle) and without 18α(H)-oleanane (blue circle).
Figure 11. Plot of αββsteranes in a ternary diagram : %C27 vs. %C28 vs. %C29 and plot of C29αββS/C29αααR vs. C29αααS/C29αααR: comparison of samples with (red circle) and without 18α(H)-oleanane (blue circle).
Preprints 137484 g011
Figure 12. LC-MS/MS chromatogram of the archaeological sample 3464 depicting the signals of the monitored precursor-product ion transitions for the targeted compounds and the internal standard.
Figure 12. LC-MS/MS chromatogram of the archaeological sample 3464 depicting the signals of the monitored precursor-product ion transitions for the targeted compounds and the internal standard.
Preprints 137484 g012
Table 1. Basic information on the samples.
Table 1. Basic information on the samples.
Site Country Archaeological Reference Phase Date Range Wine Biomarkers Bitumen Source Lab Number Reference Number
Fulayj Oman F2.041/FN405 2a Mid-3rd - mid-6thC Kermanshah 3458 1
F2.051/FN626 2a Mid-3rd - mid-6thC Yes Kermanshah 3460 3
F2.059/FN596 2a Mid-3rd - mid-6thC Kermanshah 3461 4
F2.059/FN610 2a Mid-3rd - mid-6thC Khuzistan 3462 5
F3.022/FN475 2a Mid-3rd - mid-6thC Kermanshah 3606 13
F3.023/FN512 2a Mid-3rd - mid-6thC Khuzistan 3607 14
P.012/FN423 2c Early 5th - mid-6thC Yes Khuzistan 3465 8
F2.090/FN787 2c Early 5th - mid-6thC Khuzistan 3603 10
F2.042/FN513 3 Mid-6th - late 7thC Yes Kermanshah 3459 2
F3.015/FN305 3 Mid-6th - late 7thC Khuzistan 3605 12
P.011/FN316 4a Residual post 7thC Yes Khuzistan 3463 6
P.011/FN338 4a Residual post 7thC Yes Kermanshah 3464 7
F2.022/SV182 4a Residual post 7thC Kermanshah 3602 9
F3.007/FN208 4a Residual post 7thC Khuzistan 3604 11
R.003/FN123 4b Residual post 7thC Khuzistan 3608 15
Table 2. Gross composition of the dichloromethane extract (EO in % by weight /sample) and isotopic data: 13C (‰ / VPDB) and D (‰ / VSMOW). Significance of abbreviations: sat = saturated hydrocarbons, aro = aromatic hydrocarbons, NSO= resins, asp = asphaltenes, pol = polars = resins + asphaltenes.
Table 2. Gross composition of the dichloromethane extract (EO in % by weight /sample) and isotopic data: 13C (‰ / VPDB) and D (‰ / VSMOW). Significance of abbreviations: sat = saturated hydrocarbons, aro = aromatic hydrocarbons, NSO= resins, asp = asphaltenes, pol = polars = resins + asphaltenes.
sample number Geomark reference location country EO %/sample %sat %aro %HC %NSO %asp %pol total d13Csat d13Caro d13CNSO d13Casp dDNSO average dDasp average
3458 UNK0934 Fulayj Oman 50.5 1.8 2 3.8 9 87.2 96.2 100 -27.9 -26.8 -26.9 -26.5 -83 -76 oleanana
3459 UNK0935 39.4 1.7 2 3.7 11.3 85 96.3 100 -27.7 -26.8 -27 -26.7 -84 -76 pas d'oleanane
3460 UNK0936 43.7 1.9 2.2 4.1 8.2 87.7 95.9 100 -27.3 -26.6 -26.8 -26.5 -83 -89
3461 UNK0937 40.8 2 2.9 4.9 18.6 76.5 95.1 100 -27.5 -27.8 -27.1 -26.5 -85 -75
3462 UNK0938 15.1 3.3 6 9.3 37.1 53.6 90.7 100 -27.3 -27.1 -28.1 -28.1 -97 -91
3463 UNK0939 38.0 1 1.6 2.6 9 88.4 97.4 100 -29 -28 -28 -27.9 -75 -68
3464 UNK0940 58.9 2.2 1.6 3.8 7 89.2 96.2 100 -27.6 -26.8 -26.8 -26.3 -80 -79
3465 UNK0941 35.4 1.4 2.6 4 11.7 84.3 96 100 -28.4 -27.8 -27.9 -27.9 -83 -67
3602 UNK1119 47.8 2.1 2.1 4.2 13.4 82.4 95.8 100 -27.5 -26.3 -27.1 -26.7 -106 -84
3603 UNK1120 39.6 1.8 1.3 3.1 8.6 88.3 96.9 100 -28.8 -27.5 -27.6 -27.8 -88 -73
3604 UNK1121 45.6 4.9 3.3 8.2 11.8 80.1 91.8 100 -29.1 -27.3 -27.2 -27.8 -115 -77
3605 UNK1122 37.3 1.1 1.4 2.5 8.9 88.6 97.5 100 -28.8 -27.6 -27.9 -27.8 -99 -79
3606 UNK1123 9.8 3.6 3.6 7.2 20.9 71.9 92.8 100 -27.6 -26.1 -27.1 -26.7 -107 -83
3607 UNK1124 43.7 1.9 1.8 3.7 11.9 84.3 96.3 100 -28.7 -27.1 -28 -28 -100 -75
3608 UNK1125 23.1 1.2 1.7 2.9 9.5 87.6 97.1 100 -28.1 -27.6 -28.3 -28 -96 -74
13.01921
37.9
Table 3. Molecular data on steranes and terpanes. Significance of abbreviations: C30αβHopane=17α,21β-hopane, OL/H = 18α(H)-oleanane / hopane, GA/C31αβHR = Gammacerane/ 17α,21β,22R-30-homohopane, ster/terp = steranes / terpanes, Dia /reg = diasteranes / regular steranes, %C27αββR+S = 5α,14β,17β-20R+20S-cholestane, %C28αββR+S= 5α,14β,17β-20R+20S-24methylcholestane, %C29αββR+S=5α,14β,17β-20R+20S-24ethylcholestane, C29ααα20S/20R= 5α,14α,17α-20S-24ethylcholestane / 5α,14α,17α-20R-24ethylcholestane, C29H/C30H = norhopane/ hopane, C27Ts/Tm = 18α-22,29,30-trisnorneohopane / 17α-22,29,30-trisnorhopane, C35S/C34S = C34-17α,21β-22S-extended hopane /C35- 17α,21β-22S-extended hopane.
Table 3. Molecular data on steranes and terpanes. Significance of abbreviations: C30αβHopane=17α,21β-hopane, OL/H = 18α(H)-oleanane / hopane, GA/C31αβHR = Gammacerane/ 17α,21β,22R-30-homohopane, ster/terp = steranes / terpanes, Dia /reg = diasteranes / regular steranes, %C27αββR+S = 5α,14β,17β-20R+20S-cholestane, %C28αββR+S= 5α,14β,17β-20R+20S-24methylcholestane, %C29αββR+S=5α,14β,17β-20R+20S-24ethylcholestane, C29ααα20S/20R= 5α,14α,17α-20S-24ethylcholestane / 5α,14α,17α-20R-24ethylcholestane, C29H/C30H = norhopane/ hopane, C27Ts/Tm = 18α-22,29,30-trisnorneohopane / 17α-22,29,30-trisnorhopane, C35S/C34S = C34-17α,21β-22S-extended hopane /C35- 17α,21β-22S-extended hopane.
lab number GeoMark number site C30Hppm Tet/C23 C29/H OL/H C31R/H GA/C31R GA/H C35S/C34S ster/Terp Dia/Reg %C27 %C28 %C29 C2920S/R C29abb/C29aaaR Ts/Tm tricyclics terpanes steranes C27diasteranes c29aaaRsterane
3458 UNK0934 Fulayj 2001 2.01 0.96 0.13 0.38 0.3 0.11 1.3 0.27 0.72 11.1 30.2 58.7 1.39 1.68 0.52 almost absent well preserved biodegraded present altered
3459 UNK0935 Fulayj 642 1.08 0.93 0.16 0.37 0.44 0.16 1.94 0.37 0.84 10.4 26.4 63.2 1.94 1.6 0.44 almost absent slightly biodegraded? biodegraded present altered
3460 UNK0936 Fulayj 575 1.35 1.02 0.33 0.37 0.41 0.15 2.14 0.65 1.41 11.6 28.1 60.2 2.88 3.95 0.61 almost absent biodegraded biodegraded present altered
3461 UNK0937 Fulayj 157 0.94 1.13 0.27 0.36 0.44 0.16 3.47 0,,18 0.87 15.5 26.7 57.8 2.78 1.07 0.46 almost absent biodegraded biodegraded traces altered
3462 UNK0938 Fulayj 1632 1.09 1 0 0.38 0.67 0.25 1.11 0.04 0.33 18.7 23.1 58.2 0.28 0.46 0.14 almost absent well preserved preserved traces preserved
3463 UNK0939 Fulayj 13716 6.63 0.93 0 0.33 0.63 0.21 0.99 0.06 0.05 19.8 20.6 59.6 0.64 0.94 0.11 almost absent well preserved preserved absent preserved
3464 UNK0940 Fulayj 1321 1.06 0.96 0.15 0.38 0.25 0.09 1.51 0.57 1.26 17 31 52 1.44 2.03 0.6 almost absent well preserved slighly biodegraded? abundant altered
3465 UNK0941 Fulayj 5556 3.57 1.24 0 0.31 0.68 0.21 1.18 0.1 0.15 13.8 23.3 62.9 0.85 1.15 0.19 almost absent well preserved preserved? traces preserved
3602 UNK1119 Fulayj 2536 1.55 0.75 0.14 0.4 0.25 0.1 1.19 0.2 0.88 11.2 29.1 59.8 1.3 1.96 0.5 absent well preserved biodegraded low present biodegraded
3603 UNK1120 Fulayj 11306 3.21 1.1 0 0.38 0.61 0.23 1.11 0.09 0.08 26.2 24.8 49 0.53 1.04 0.19 almost absent well preserved well preserved?? almost absent preserved
3604 UNK1121 Fulayj 2424 1.94 1.18 0 0.32 0.63 0.2 0.9 0.2 1.73 21.4 31.7 46.9 0.73 1.12 0.27 absent well preserved preserved abundant preserved
3605 UNK1122 Fulayj 9480 5.72 1.14 0 0.34 0.66 0.22 1.88 0.07 0.1 14.6 24.2 61.2 0.57 0.86 0.18 absent well preserved biodegraded traces preserved
3606 UNK1123 Fulayj 1617 1.12 0.9 0.12 0.42 0.39 0.16 1.81 0.14 1.21 11.8 23.2 65 1.74 1.71 0.43 absent well preserved? biodegraded present biodegraded
3607 UNK1124 Fulayj 16149 3.66 1.04 0 0.34 0.56 0.19 0.99 0.07 0.09 24.6 21.7 53.7 0.59 0.94 0.15 almost absent well preserved biodegraded? traces preserved
3608 UNK1125 Fulayj 1723 1.35 1.19 0 0.31 0.9 0.28 2.78 0.13 0.26 6.4 20.1 73.5 1.72 1.58 0.18 almost absent well preserved? biodegraded traces bioegraded
Table 4. Wine biomarkers detected on archaeological samples. Samples were spiked with a known concentration of Daitzin, which was used as internal standard.
Table 4. Wine biomarkers detected on archaeological samples. Samples were spiked with a known concentration of Daitzin, which was used as internal standard.
lab number site Malvidin 3-Glucoside Vitisin A Vitisin B Daidzin (Internal standard)
3458 Fulayj absent absent absent present
3459 Fulayj absent absent present present
3460 Fulayj absent absent present present
3461 Fulayj absent absent absent present
3462 Fulayj absent absent absent present
3463 Fulayj present absent present present
3464 Fulayj present absent present present
3465 Fulayj present absent present present
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated