5. Conclusions and Recommendations
The study's methodology is driven by the observation that, although returns are detrimentally low during times of market stress, the conditional variance of the stock portfolio consisting of conventional and Islamic equities separately increases at those times. Due to this fact, investors' focus has shifted to alternative assets to hedge risk or obtain a safe haven advantage in case of an economic downturn. This study is predicated on the claims that no prior research has examined the asymmetric dynamics of financial asset returns, the efficacy of these alternative assets as a safe haven, their capacity to hedge, and their benefits for diversification. In this research, data consist of two stock indices and alternative assets. The selected stocks include Islamic stocks and conventional stocks from Belgium, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Mexico. The chosen alternative asset is GSPM. The sample period ranges from March 2011 to March 2021.
The majority of the means of the returns are positive during the sample period for selected stocks and alternative assets, and Islamic stocks have the largest mean and largest standard deviation. All the standard deviations of the returns are positive during the sample period. Islamic stock markets have a larger range for the maximum and minimum than conventional stock markets, and their behavior is more volatile than conventional stocks. The return distributions for the stock indices (Islamic and conventional) and alternative assets (GSPM) are positively skewed. The mass of the distribution is concentrated on the left side of the distribution, with the right tail being longer. After a normal distribution, all of the return series show excess kurtosis and are rejected to follow a normal distribution. For each volatility equation, the total of the ARCH and GARCH terms approaches one, suggesting strong volatility persistence. The skewed-t distribution's values degree of freedom, which varies from 2 to 8, shows that the error terms were non-normal and had a heavy tail. All series have a positive and substantial asymmetry coefficient at the 1% level, which further supports the heavy tail's rightward skew. Large positive returns are, therefore, more probable than large negative returns. To quantify the dependence between stocks and precious metals, six single-copula models, including normal, t, and four various forms of the Clayton copula(Wang et al. 2013). For every pair of stock indices and precious metals (alternative assets), the coefficient estimations are shown. The findings demonstrate the significance of the parameters calculated by the t, normal, 180-degree, and Clayton methods at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels for each pair. Except for Mexico, all pairs are important for GSPM and Islamic stock. Upon comparing the log-likelihood, AIC, and BIC values of various copulas for every pair, it is evident that no copula outperforms the others.
Liu et al. (2017) state that while the t-copula and normal copula may both express symmetric positive and negative reliance, the t-copula has symmetric tail dependence and the normal copula has no tail dependence. Consequently, the mixed Clayton copulas are further employed for the dependent-switching copula model to capture the asymmetric tail dependence. For every pair of stocks and precious metals, the outcomes of reliance-switching copula models are estimated. The precious metals are paired first with Islamic stock indices. The predicted transition probabilities in all assessed pairs are close to 1, indicating strong persistence of the same dependence regime. For Hong Kong, India, Japan, and Malaysia, all the copula parameters are significant in the positive correlation regime when the Islamic stock and GSPM are in a bearish state. However, there have been reports of positive reliance on Malaysia, Japan, India, and Hong Kong. Therefore, most of the countries have positive dependence, which renders GSPM inappropriate for reducing portfolio risk. When the Islamic stock index and the GSPM are both experiencing bullish market conditions under a regime of positive correlation, Ireland, Italy, Japan, and Malaysia are found to have strong positive dependence, indicating a simultaneous price jump.
Above all, this study examines the relationship between the Islamic stock index and the market, with the former in a bullish state (upper tail) and the latter in a bearish market state (lower tail). Results indicate a strong correlation between the upper tail of GSPM for Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Mexico and the lower tails of Islamic. Positive dependence is found in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Mexico. This result indicates that, at the same time, losses in the Islamic stock index can be offset by investment in GSPM. These findings suggest that GSPM can be regarded as a safe haven asset for Islamic stock indices. When the Islamic stock index is bullish and the GSPM is bearish, significant dependence is reported for all countries. There is negative dependence found for Hong Kong and India, showing that the bearish market state GSPM will have no impact on the Islamic stock portfolio. On the other hand, positive dependence is found between pairs of GSPM and Islamic stock in Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Mexico, showing that the lower tail of GSPM will impact the upper tail of Islamic stock of these countries, making GSPM are not a viable choice.
Secondly, when the conventional stocks index and GSPM are in bearish market states under a positive correlation regime, significant dependence is reported for all countries. A negative dependence is documented in Belgium, France, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, and Malaysia. Significant positive dependence is reported in Germany, Hong Kong, and Mexico. When both the stock index and GSPM are in bullish market trends under a positive correlation regime, results for countries are significant except Belgium, Germany, Hong Kong, India and Malaysia. Positive dependence is found in France, Ireland, Italy, and Japan. It will lead to the conclusion that GSPM in a bullish market is beneficial for investors to be included in the conventional stock portfolio in a boom market. Negative dependence is found among the pairs of GSPM and conventional stocks in a bullish market in Mexico, showing no benefit.
Furthermore, findings show significant dependence between the lower tail of conventional stocks and the upper tail of GSPM for sample countries except India and Mexico. Positive dependence is found in Belgium, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, and Japan. This result indicates that, at the same time, losses in conventional stock index can be offset by investment in GSPM. Negative significance dependence is found for Malaysia. When the conventional stock index is bullish and GSPM is bearish, significant dependence is reported for all countries except for Japan. Negative dependence is found in France, Hong Kong, India, Ireland, and Italy, and positive dependence is found between pairs of GSPM and conventional stock in Belgium, Germany, Malaysia, and Mexico. This finding is inferred as the lower tail of GSPM will impact the upper tail of conventional stock of these countries, making GSPM unfavorable.
To represent the conditional dependency between traditional stock indices and Islamic stock indices and alternative assets (precious metals) in a more realistic way than the previous studies, a relatively new modeling technique, a time-varying copula with switching dependence, is used. A dependence-switching copula represents a reliance structure more accurately and realistically than a single copula regime because the dependence may alter between positive and negative correlation regimes with time. The fluctuating behavior of markets has a significant impact on economic variables, especially the downward trend during a crisis. There is growing interest in portfolio management to safeguard investors from risks and avoid market turmoil. Conditional dependence between stock indices and alternative assets such as GSPM is examined. Overall, the addition of alternative assets to the stock portfolio reduces risks and provides better diversification benefits. However, the results vary depending on the circumstances of the country.