Submitted:
14 October 2024
Posted:
15 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Area Study
2.2. Equipment Specifications and Data Processing in Tomographies
2.2.1. Tomography: Equipment Characteristics
2.2.2. Methodology for Tomograph
2.3. TIMP Equations and DROC Criteria for ϱa Analysis
2.4. Dynamic Nature of DROCs and Their Association with ρa Values
- Controlled Displacement from the Surface: Parameters such as transmissibility, storage capacity, effective porosity, and hydraulic conductivity of the unconfined aquifer determine the DROCs' movement to deeper zones, characterized by heavier masses.
- Continued Travel of Substances: DROCs may have different arrival times at the water table. This could involve two types of movements over the water table or continued travel within the aquifer, contributing to the spread of contamination.
- Arrival of Heaviest DROCs at the Aquifer Bottom: The heaviest DROCs may settle at the bottom of the aquifer.
- To analyze the associations between ρa2022 and ρa2023 and their respective DROC phases, we followed the principles established in equations 1, 2, 3, and 4, which account for both linear and nonlinear representations simulating the anisotropy of TIMP. In this context, we considered the measurements of ρa, incorporating both previously reported limits and ranges found in the literature, as well as new ranges proposed for the first time in this study:
- RI Phase: Characterized by high ρa values (>35 Ωm), following the criteria of [23].
- RI/II Phase: For the DROCs interface within the old/intermediate zone the range of 25 to 35 Ωm was proposed.
- II Phase: Associated with the zone between RI/AI, where DROCs metamorphosis occurs, with a range of 18–25 Ωm.
- Leachate-Free (Flw) Zone: Defined by a range of 11 to 18 Ωm, as reported by [28].
2.5. Correlation Analysis of ρa2022 and ρa2023 with DROCs Transformation Phases
3. Results
3.1. Annual Dynamic Processes of DROCs Stages
3.2. Assessment of Subsoil Dynamics Using 95% Confidence Interval
3.3. Evaluation of Linear Relationships and Model Fit for Subsoil DROCs Variability
3.4. DROCs Transformation Dynamics and Invaded Areas: Linear Nonlinear Analysis
- (1)
- The transformation of DROCs begins with the arrival of leachates from the surface, originating from the OAGD. These total invasions characterize the IR zone, which can encompass both the saturated and unsaturated zones of the aquifer and serve as a continuous source feeding the subsoil system of DROCs that will be transformed through the dynamics of the porous medium.
- (2)
- An interface IR/II indicating changes in the concentration of leachates arriving before the transformation process, and are now tending to reach the next intermediate phase II.
- (3)
- The intermediate phase II usually accumulates the most amount of mass/time due to the retard and prolonged process required to reach the conditions to reach the next phase.
- (4)
- The final stage of the process determines the status of DROCs: either it is retained within the porous medium or completely purged from the groundwater system. Independently of all these transformation processes of DROCs, there is a zone characterized by its granulometric conditions, predominantly represented by the presence of clayey bodies. This gives it high not-permeability against the invasion of leachate-laden water according to ф, allowing it to remain with zones unpolluted.
- (5)
- The Flw zone is usually found in the aquifer's unsaturated zone close to the surface. Here, there is a risk that it could break through the impermeable layer of its geological structure, which might turn it into a leachate zone.
3.5. Analysis and Association with RI Stage
3.6. Annual Variation ϱa on Subsoil for Interface RI/II
3.7. Characterization AI Invasions and Degradation

3.8. Results of Evolution from Flw Zones
3.9. Causes of Degradation in DROCs Stages

3.10. Direct and Indirect Analysis and Validation of DROC Stages within OAGD
3.11. Validation and Lineal Correlation Results
3.12. Effectiveness of Methodology and DROCs Analysis
3.13. Validation of Detection Methods for DROCs in OAGD and LSWM
3.14. Causes of DROCs Degradation Phases
4. Discussions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gupta, N.; Gupta, R. Solid Waste Management and Sustainable Cities in India: The Case of Chandigarh. Environ Urban 2015, 27, 573–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, R.; Ganguly, R.; Gupta, A.K. An Assessment of Solid Waste Management System in Chandigarh City, India. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 2015, 20. [Google Scholar]
- Hoornweg, D.; Bhada-Tata, P. WHAT A WASTE A Global Review of Solid Waste Management; Urban Development & Local Government Unit, Ed.; Ira.; 15: Washington, DC 20433 USA, 2012; Vol. 15.
- Kaza, S.; Yao, L.C.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050; washinghton, D.W.Bank., Ed.; 1ra ed.; Washington, DC: World Bank.: Washington, DC, 2018; Vol. 1; ISBN 978-1-4648-1347-4.
- Hemidat, S.; Achouri, O.; El Fels, L.; Elagroudy, S.; Hafidi, M.; Chaouki, B.; Ahmed, M.; Hodgkinson, I.; Guo, J. Solid Waste Management in the Context of a Circular Economy in the MENA Region. Sustainability 2022, 14, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diario Oficial de la Federación Ley General Para La Prevención y Gestión Integral de Los Residuos.; Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.: CDMX, Mexico, 2023; pp. 10–37.
- García-Mondragón, D.; Cervantes-Zepeda, I.; Gómez-Demetrio, W.; Gallego-Alarcón, I.; García-Pulido, D.; González-Blanco, G. Gestión de Los Residuos Sólidos En México: Análisis Cualitativo de Los Diagnósticos Básicos. INTER DISCIPLINA 2023, 11, 215–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hard, J. Nineteenth Century Urban Labor Precursors of the Mexican Revolution: The Development of an Ideology. The Americas Journal 2015, 30, 297–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SEMARNAT Mexico`s State of the Environmental Report. Environmental Statistical Compendium. Key and Environmental Performance Indicators; Edicion 2012; CDMX, 2012.
- Martínez, J.E.D.; Caballero, M.J.L. Densificación Urbana Como Solución Sostenible a Ciudades Difusas. DELOS 2022, 12, 2–12. [Google Scholar]
- SEMARNAT Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-083-SEMARNAT-2003.“Especificaciones de Protección Ambiental Para La Selección Del Sitio, Diseño, Construcción, Operación, Monitoreo, Clausura y Obras Complementarias de Un Sitio de Disposición Final de Residuos Sólidos Urbanos y de Manejo Especial,”; CDMX, 2021; pp. 1–15.
- BBVV Research Global | The COVID-19 Impact on Consumption in Real Time and High Definition: Dec 17th. Available online: https://www.bbvaresearch.com/en/publicaciones/global-the-covid-19-impact-on-consumption-in-real-time-and-high-definition-dec-17th/ (accessed on 1 October 2024).
- SEMARNAT Guía Técnica Para Orientar En La Elaboración de Estudios de Caracterización de Sitios Contaminados. 2010, 1, 9–212.
- The World Bank What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10986/17388 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
- Ferronato, N.; Gorritty Portillo, M.A.; Guisbert Lizarazu, E.G.; Torretta, V.; Bezzi, M.; Ragazzi, M. The Municipal Solid Waste Management of La Paz (Bolivia): Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Development. Waste Management & Research 2018, 36, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghafourian, K.; Mohamed, Z.; Ismail, S.; Malakute, R.; Abolghasemi, M. Current Status of the Research on Construction and Demolition Waste Management. Indian J Sci Technol 2016, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Josimovi, B.; Mari, I. Methodology for the Regional Landfill Site Selection. Sustainable Development - Authoritative and Leading Edge Content for Environmental Management 2012. [CrossRef]
- Arjwech, R.; Somchat, K.; Pondthai, P.; Everett, M.; Schulmeister, M.; Saengchomphu, S. Assessment of Geological, Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Characteristics of a Proposed Waste Disposal Site: A Case Study in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Geosciences (Basel) 2020, 10, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castrejón, D.; Zavala, A.M.; Flores, J.A.; Flores, M.P.; Barrón, D. Analysis of the Contribution of CCS to Achieve the Objectives of Mexico to Reduce GHG Emissions. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2018, 71, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariano, N.-C.; Omar, L.-C.; Patricia, M.-S.; Rosario, R.-G.; de Guevara-Torres María, L.; José, A.-C. Aquifer/Water Sources Drip Factor as Alternative to Measure Climatic Effects on Disponibility of Water Agricultural Irrigation in Semi-Arid/Arid Zones. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2018, 171, 012031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sellers, K. Fundamentals of Hazardous Waste Site Remediation; Routledge, 2018; ISBN 9780203755273.
- Sepúlveda, T.V.; Trejo, J.V. Tecnologías de Remediación Para Suelos Contaminados. In Jiménez Editores; 2002; Vol. 65, pp. 1–64 ISBN 968-817-557-9.
- Robledo, F.E.; Martinelli, H.P. Caracterización de Zonas Contaminadas Por Derrames Recientes de HiDROCarburos Mediante Métodos Geofísicos. SCIELO, Geoacta 2011, 36, 129–150. [Google Scholar]
- Aizebeokhai, A.P. 2D and 3D Geoelectrical Resistivity Imaging: Theory and Field Design. Scientific Research and Essays 2010, 5, 3592–3605. [Google Scholar]
- Mota, R.; Monteiro Santos, F.A.; Mateus, A.; Marques, F.O.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Figueiras, J.; Amaral, H. Granite Fracturing and Incipient Pollution beneath a Recent Landfill Facility as Detected by Geoelectrical Surveys. J Appl Geophy 2004, 57, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pomposiello, C.; Dapeña, C.; Boujon, P.; Favetto, A. Tomografías Eléctricas En El Basurero Municipal Ciudad de Gualeguychú, Provincia de Entre Ríos: Evidencias de Contaminación. Revista de la Asociacion Geologica Argentina 2009, 64, 1851–8249. [Google Scholar]
- BELMONTE, S.I.; JIMÉNEZ, M.E.; BORTOLOTTI, A. Estudio de Una Pluma Contaminante Producida Por Lixiviados, Utilizando Métodos Geoeléctricos. Geos 2008, 28, 142. [Google Scholar]
- Suárez, J.; Zúñiga, H. Detección De Capas De Desechos Con Métodos Geoeléctricos : Caso Relleno Sanitario Río Azul, Detection of Waste´S Layers With Geoelectric Methods : Case Of. Revista Geologica De America Central. 2013, 129–139. [Google Scholar]
- Khalil, M.H. Magnetic, Geo-Electric, and Groundwater and Soil Quality Analysis over a Landfill from a Lead Smelter, Cairo, Egypt. J Appl Geophy 2012, 86, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedretti, D.; Masetti, M.; Beretta, G.P.; Vitiello, M. A Revised Conceptual Model to Reproduce the Distribution of Chlorinated Solvents in the Rho Aquifer (Italy). Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation 2013, 33, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DMP Guasave: Economía, Empleo, Equidad, Calidad de Vida, Educación, Salud y Seguridad Pública | Data México. Available online: https://www.economia.gob.mx/datamexico/es/profile/geo/guasave (accessed on 2 October 2024).
- Ferrari, L.; López-Martínez, M.; Orozco-Esquivel, T.; Bryan, S.E.; Duque-Trujillo, J.; Lonsdale, P.; Solari, L. Late Oligocene to Middle Miocene Rifting and Synextensional Magmatism in the Southwestern Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico: The Beginning of the Gulf of California Rift. Geosphere 2013, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, S.E.; Orozco-Esquivel, T.; Ferrari, L.; López-Martínez, M. Pulling Apart the Mid to Late Cenozoic Magmatic Record of the Gulf of California: Is There a Comondú Arc? Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2014, 385, 389–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duque-Trujillo, J.; Ferrari, L.; Orozco-Esquivel, T.; López-Martínez, M.; Lonsdale, P.; Bryan, S.E.; Kluesner, J.; Piñero-Lajas, D.; Solari, L. Timing of Rifting in the Southern Gulf of California and Its Conjugate Margins: Insights from the Plutonic Record. Geol Soc Am Bull 2015, 127, 702–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotler, H.; Corona, J.A.; Galeana-Pizaña, J.M.; Cotler, H.; Corona, J.A.; Galeana-Pizaña, J.M. Erosión de Suelos y Carencia Alimentaria En México: Una Primera Aproximación. Investigaciones geográficas 2020. [CrossRef]
- Lal, R. Soils and Sustainable Agriculture. A Review. Agron Sustain Dev 2008, 28, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrero, M.; Thornton, P.K.; Power, B.; Bogard, J.R.; Remans, R.; Fritz, S.; Gerber, J.S.; Nelson, G.; See, L.; Waha, K.; et al. Farming and the Geography of Nutrient Production for Human Use: A Transdisciplinary Analysis. Lancet Planet Health 2017, 1, e33–e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández, A.; Pérez-Campos, X. Lithosphere Thickness in the Gulf of California Region. Tectonophysics 2017, 719–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michaud, F.; Royer, J.Y.; Bourgois, J.; Dyment, J.; Calmus, T.; Bandy, W.; Sosson, M.; Mortera-Gutiérrez, C.; Sichler, B.; Rebolledo-Viera, M.; et al. Oceanic-Ridge Subduction vs. Slab Break off: Plate Tectonic Evolution along the Baja California Sur Continental Margin since 15 Ma. Geology 2006, 34, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emery, X. Conditioning Simulations of Gaussian Random Fields by Ordinary Kriging. Math Geol 2007, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corriols, M.; Dahlin, T. Geophysical Characterization of the León-Chinandega Aquifer, Nicaragua. Hydrogeol J 2008, 16, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Áridos De La Mesa, V.; Caso, C.; Dulcita, L.; De Ramos, V.; Potosí, L.; Héctor López-Loera, M. Boletín de La Sociedad Geológica Mexicana Volumen 66. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana 2014, 66, 165–181. [Google Scholar]
- Guillermo, B.; Salvatierra, Ñ.; Osman, B. Evaluación Del Subsuelo Mediante La Prospección Geofísica – Geoeléctrica En El Ámbito de Estudio Del Cerco Perimétrico de La Facultad de Ingeniería de Minas Civil Ambiental–UNH 2020.
- Zhou, G.L.; Hou, Z.T. Stochastic Generalized Porous Media Equations with Lévy Jump. Acta Math Sin Engl Ser 2011, 27, 1671–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vázquez, J.L. The Mathematical Theories of Diffusion: Nonlinear and Fractional Diffusion. arXiv: Analysis of PDEs 2017, 2186, 205–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ignat, L.I.; Stan, D. Asymptotic Behavior of Solutions to Fractional Diffusion–Convection Equations. J Lond Math Soc 2017, 97, 258–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Holzinger, A.; Jüngel, A.; Zamponi, N. The Mathematical Theories of Diffusion: Nonlinear and Fractional Diffusion. arXiv: Analysis of PDEs 2017, 47, 2217–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salomoni, V.A.; De Marchi, N. A Fractional Approach to Fluid Flow and Solute Transport within Deformable Saturated Porous Media. Int J Comput Mater Sci Eng 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benson, D.A.; Meerschaert, M.M. A Simple and Efficient Random Walk Solution of Multi-Rate Mobile/Immobile Mass Transport Equations. Adv Water Resour 2009, 32, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Zhai, J. Stochastic Generalized Porous Media Equations Driven by Lévy Noise with Increasing Lipschitz Nonlinearities. J Evol Equ 2021, 21, 4845–4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metcalfe, G.; Lester, D.; Trefry, M. A Primer on the Dynamical Systems Approach to Transport in Porous Media. Transp Porous Media 2023, 146, 55–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- del Teso, F.; Endal, J.; Jakobsen, E.R. Robust Numerical Methods for Nonlocal (and Local) Equations of Porous Medium Type. Part I: Theory. SIAM J Numer Anal 2019, 57, 2266–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez, J.L. The Porous Medium Equation; Oxford University PressOxford, 2006; ISBN 0198569033.
- Essaid, H.I.; Bekins, B.A.; Cozzarelli, I.M. Organic Contaminant Transport and Fate in the Subsurface: Evolution of Knowledge and Understanding. Water Resour Res 2015, 51, 4861–4902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevnin, V.; Delgado-Rodríguez, O.; Fernández-Linares, L.; Zegarra Martínez, H.; Mousatov, A.; Ryjov, A. Geoelectrical Characterization of an Oil-Contaminated Site in Tabasco, Mexico. Geofísica Internacional 2005, 44, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atekwana, E.A.; Atekwana, E.A. Geophysical Signatures of Microbial Activity at HyDROCarbon Contaminated Sites: A Review. Surv Geophys 2010, 31, 247–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bermejo Fraile, B. Análisis de Los Datos En Un Proyecto de Investigación. Matronas profesión 2005, 6, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
- Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Bi, Y.; Zou, H.; Zhu, C. Dynamic Monitoring of Soil Bulk Density and Infiltration Rate during Coal Mining in Sandy Land with Different Vegetation. Int J Coal Sci Technol 2014, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SMN-conagua Resúmenes Mensuales de Temperaturas y Lluvia. Available online: https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/temperaturas-y-lluvias/resumenes-mensuales-de-temperaturas-y-lluvias (accessed on 8 October 2024).
- Norzagaray Campos, M.; Muñoz Sevilla, P.; Montiel Montoya, J.; Llanes Cárdenas, O.; Ladrón de Guevara Torres, M.; Serrano García, L.A. Rainfall Potential and Consequences on Structural Soil Degradation of the Most Important Agricultural Region of Mexico. Atmosphere (Basel) 2024, 15, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuevas-Reyes, V.; Loaiza Meza, A.; Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, O.G.; Borja Bravo, M.; Rosales-Nieto, C.A. Tipología de Productor y Efectos Indirectos Del Cambio Climático En La Ganadería Bovina En Sinaloa. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2024, 15, 555–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reynolds, J. An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics; John Wiley & Sons, Ed.; Segunda.; 2011; Vol. 2.
- Khoshouei, M.; Bagherpour, R. Measurement, Prediction, and Modeling of the Drilling Specific Energy by Soft Rock Properties during the Drilling Operation. Measurement 2023, 222, 113679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SEMARNAT NOM-001-SEMARNAT-2021, Que Establece Los Límites Permisibles de Contaminantes En Las Descargas de Aguas Residuales En Cuerpos Receptores Propiedad de La Nación; 2022; Vol. 8.



| A | B | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ρa2022 | ρa2023 | ρa2022 | ρa2023. | ||
| Normal test | Ωm | Ωm | Parameter statistic | Ωm | Ωm |
| Shapiro-Wilk W | 0,91 | 0,99 | ϱamin | 7.31 | 6.54 |
| p (normal) | 0 | 0,92 | ϱamax | 56.88 | 42.18 |
| Jarque-Bera JB | 49,36 | 0,62 | Σϱa | 2193.34 | 2365.66 |
| p (normal) | 0 | 0,73 | 21.93 | 23.66 | |
| p (Monte Carlo) | 0 | 0,7 | SEϱa | 0.88 | 0.77 |
| Chi^2 | 8,48 | 0,24 | σ2 | 77.87 | 59.95 |
| p (normal) | 0 | 0,62 | σ0 | 8.82 | 7.74 |
| Anderson-Darling A | 2,28 | 0,12 | ϱam | 20.51 | 23.43 |
| p (normal) | 0 | 0,99 | ϱaMo | 21.93 | 23.65 |
| Rabs | 49,67 | 35,64 | |||
| R2[ρa2022 vs. ρa2022 ] | 0,555 | ||||
| R²_adjusted | 0,551 | ||||
| 1-R2 | 0,49 | ||||
| Cv | 40,23 | 32,73 | |||
| R [ρa2022 vs. ρa2022 ] | 0,745 | ||||
| Q25th | 16.86 | 18.17 | |||
| Q75th | 25.6 | 29.17 | |||
| Swew_ ρa | 1.3 | 0.08 | |||
| Kurt _ ρa | 2.48 | − 0.31 | |||
| Mg | 20.37 | 22.24 | |||
| Q25th | 16.86 | 18.17 | |||
| Q75th | 25.6 | 29.17 | |||
| 95%IC | 20.20–23.66 | 22.13–25.17 | |||
| Keys for individual annual statistical parameters (punctual, dispersion, symmetry, and confidence interval) evaluated: minimum (ρamin) and maximum (ρamax) values, total sum (Σρa) mean (ρ̅a), standard error of ρa (SEρ̅a), standard deviation (σ0), variance (σ²), median (ρam), mode (ρaMo), absolute range (Rabs), standard deviation (σ0), variance (σ²), determination coefficient (R²), non-determination or alienation K coefficient (1 - R²), coefficient of variation (Cv), correlation coefficient (R), symmetry skewness (Swew_ρa), symmetry kurtosis (Kurt_ρa), positional percentile 25 % parameters (Q25th), positional percentile 75 % (Q75th) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). | |||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).