4. Discussion
The current study investigated the relationship between childhood eating habits and implicit attitudes toward foods in adulthood. Contrary to the research hypotheses, no significant relationship was found between childhood fruit consumption and participants’ D-scores. Similarly, no association was observed between childhood snack consumption and D-scores. This suggests that childhood eating habits may not directly influence implicit attitudes toward foods in adulthood. However, additional analyses revealed that participants with high childhood fruit consumption had significantly higher D-scores than those with low fruit consumption. This indicates that individuals who ate more fruits as children had more positive implicit attitudes toward fruits than their counterparts. Moreover, a gender-based analysis found similar results among women.
This study focused on a specific aspect of the Theory of Food (ToF) [
8,
9], namely the relationship between childhood eating habits and implicit attitudes toward foods in adulthood. This highlights how the foods consumed during childhood may be linked to the
“food theory
” individuals develop in adulthood. However, ToF proposes additional variables that might influence this
“food theory,
” such as the cultural context, family and social experiences related to food, and the emotional context of food consumption [
9]. Therefore, the findings of this study may not necessarily indicate a flaw in the theory but rather suggest that factors beyond childhood eating habits influenced participant
s’ implicit attitudes toward foods.
Indeed, the literature provides evidence of other variables affecting implicit attitudes toward foods. For instance, implicit attitudes can be influenced by an individua
l’s knowledge about the healthiness of foods, where exposure to images of health risks associated with unhealthy foods affects participant
s’ implicit attitudes toward those foods [
30]. Additionally, values and beliefs also play a role, with vegan participants exhibiting more negative implicit attitudes toward animal-based foods than vegetarians and vegetarians demonstrating more negative attitudes than omnivores. Other factors, such as moral views on food and personality traits like empathy, have also been shown to affect implicit food attitudes [
31].
Furthermore, ongoing dietary restrictions influence implicit attitudes toward foods. Individuals on long-term restrictive diets tend to display less positive implicit attitudes toward tasty foods than control groups [
32]. Additionally, childhood food-related memories, such as being rewarded with food or having a controlled diet, have been linked to higher consumption of sweet and salty snacks in adulthood. On the other hand, guidance toward healthy eating and restrictions were associated with higher consumption of fruits and vegetables [
33]. Given that implicit attitudes are connected to eating habits and dietary choices [
7], it can be inferred that childhood eating memories influence food consumption habits and implicit attitudes in adulthood.
Another potential explanation for the lack of association between childhood eating habits and implicit attitudes in this study may be related to the validity of the ToF. The findings of this study could be seen as a partial challenge to the theory, suggesting that further research is needed to understand better the complex relationships between childhood dietary habits and various cognitive and emotional variables.
When the sample was divided into quartiles reflecting low versus high fruit consumption, differences emerged in D-scores, with the high-consumption group displaying higher D-scores. This finding suggests a trend toward the research hypothesis, and increasing the sample size in future studies could reveal the anticipated effect in correlation and difference analyses.
To further explore these differences, the sample was analyzed by gender. Among women, those with high childhood fruit consumption had significantly higher D-scores than those with low fruit consumption. This difference was not observed among men. However, it is important to interpret this result cautiously, given the small sample size, particularly in the quartile analysis where each group contained fewer than 30 participants. This may lead to potential issues with the normality assumption required for statistical tests.
Nonetheless, the more positive implicit attitudes of women in the high fruit consumption group could be influenced by additional variables. For example, a study found that women who enjoyed shopping for and preparing food consumed more fruits and vegetables than those who did not enjoy these activities [
34]. This suggests that such behaviours influence wome
n’s implicit attitudes and explain the observed differences.
Previous research has also indicated gender differences in food-related attitudes, with women reported to consume more fruits, avoid high-fat foods, and limit salty food intake compared to men [
35]. Women tend to place greater importance on the healthiness of foods, while men often prioritize taste [
36]. Additionally, women generally know more about the health effects of the foods they consume than men [
37]. These attitude differences are likely reflected at the implicit level, potentially accounting for the gender differences observed in this study. Other research has shown that wome
n’s preferences for healthy food are primarily driven by more excellent nutritional knowledge and a higher motivation to maintain weight than men [
38], further supporting the bias in wome
n’s implicit attitudes toward healthier foods.
The current stud
y’s findings may also be influenced by limitations related to the tools used. One primary limitation concerns the validity and reliability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Some have identified issues with the generalizability and reproducibility of the IAT [
39]. In contrast, others have noted low test-retest reliability [
40], potentially due to the reliance on reaction times, where even a tenth of a second can significantly affect scores. Additionally, the IA
T’s relative nature complicates interpretation, as a strong association between
“fruits
” and
“pleasant
” may also reflect a solid opposite association between
“snacks
” and
“unpleasant
” [
41]. Another limitation is the reliance on recall questionnaires for childhood eating habits, which may have led to inaccuracies due to the passage of time [
42,
43,
44]. The sample characteristics may also limit the generalizability of the findings, as the average D-score was notably higher than that found in previous research [
7], with fewer participants showing negative D-scores, suggesting a tendency toward positive implicit attitudes toward fruits and negative attitudes toward snacks.
While this study did not fully validate the ToF, it provides avenues for further research into additional variables that may influence implicit food attitudes. Future studies should explore these factors and employ different methodologies, such as longitudinal studies, to assess childhood dietary habits and their impact on adult implicit attitudes. Psycho-physiological measures (e.g., EEG, skin conductance, heart rate) could also be used to evaluate participants’ responses to various foods in adulthood. Additionally, increasing the sample size could help clarify the differences between high and low-fruit consumption groups by allowing subgroup analyses based on gender and dietary preferences (e.g., vegan, vegetarian).