Submitted:
24 September 2024
Posted:
24 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Program
2.1. Specimens Layout
2.2. Materials Properties
2.3. Specimens Preparation and Reinforcement
2.4. Testing Set-Up
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Mode of Failure
3.2. Bond Strength
3.3. Strain Values
3.4. Local Bond Stress-Slip Value
4. Conclusions
- The results showed significant improvement in bond strength using EBROTG method by delaying the debonding of the CFRP, when compared specimens strengthened using the EBR method. The specimens strengthened using the EBROTG approach showed an improvement of 11 to 86% in bond strength according to the groove dimensions.
- The effect of groove width has noteworthy consequence on bond strength. Increasing the groove width between 2, 4, and 6 mm upgraded the bond strength by 37%, 60%, and 86% respectively compared with EBR specimens.
- The distances between grooves with identical groove section dimensions has significant effect by increasing the distances from 2, 4, and 8 mm. The bond strength decreased from 13, to 10.34, and 8.36 kN (from 72%, to 37%, and 11%) respectively. By combining the effects of the width and distances between grooves, it can be concluded that the total cross-section area of the grooves at a certain bonding length and their distribution along this bonding length are the crucial factors in determining the increase in the bonding strength.
- The results indicated no significant increase in bond strength with increasing groove depths since no failure was observed surrounding the grooves.
- The bond stress-slip diagram was extracted from the different strain gages along the bonding length, and the predicted curves can be utilized in finite element modeling of concrete members strengthened with EBROTG method.
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Declaration of Competing Interest
References
- Meier, U. Strengthening of structures using carbon fibre/epoxy composites. Construction and Building Materials 1995, 9, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao J, Teng J. Plate end debonding in FRP-plated RC beams—I: Experiments. Engineering Structures 2007, 29, 2457–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajmir-Riahi A, Moshiri N, Mostofinejad D. Inquiry into bond behavior of CFRP sheets to concrete exposed to elevated temperatures–Experimental & analytical evaluation. Composites Part B: Engineering 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gao P, Gu X, Mosallam AS. Flexural behavior of preloaded reinforced concrete beams strengthened by prestressed CFRP laminates. Composite Structures 2016, 157, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinelli E, Hosseini A, Ghafoori E, Motavalli M. Behavior of prestressed CFRP plates bonded to steel substrate: Numerical modeling and experimental validation. Composite Structures 2019, 207, 974–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini A, Nussbaumer A, Motavalli M. Mixed mode I/II fatigue crack arrest in steel members using prestressed CFRP reinforcement. International Journal of 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosallam A, Banerjee S. Enhancement in in-plane shear capacity of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering 2011, 42, 1657–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini A, Mostofinejad D, Emami M. Influence of bonding technique on bond behavior of CFRP-to-clay brick masonry joints: Experimental study using particle image velocimetry (PIV). International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 2015, 59, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali A, Abdalla J, Hawileh R, Galal K. CFRP mechanical anchorage for externally strengthened RC beams under flexure. Physics Procedia 2014, 55, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu P, Silva PF, Nanni A. Description of a mechanical device for prestressing of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer sheets-Part I. ACI Structural Journal 2008, 105, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
- Michels J, Martinelli E, Czaderski C, Motavalli M. Prestressed CFRP strips with gradient anchorage for structural concrete retrofitting: experiments and numerical modeling. Polymers 2014, 6, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham HB, Al-Mahaidi R. Prediction models for debonding failure loads of carbon fiber reinforced polymer retrofitted reinforced concrete beams. Journal of composites for construction 2006, 10, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim YJ, Wight RG, Green MF. Flexural strengthening of RC beams with prestressed CFRP sheets: Development of nonmetallic anchor systems. Journal of Composites for Construction 2008, 12, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michels J, Sena-Cruz J, Czaderski C, Motavalli M. Structural strengthening with prestressed CFRP strips with gradient anchorage. Journal of Composites for Construction 2013, 17, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilotta A, Ceroni F, Di Ludovico M, Nigro E, Pecce M, Manfredi G. Bond efficiency of EBR and NSM FRP systems for strengthening concrete members. Journal of Composites for Construction 2011, 15, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajihashemi A, Mostofinejad D, Azhari M. Investigation of RC beams strengthened with prestressed NSM CFRP laminates. Journal of Composites for Construction 2011, 15, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Abdwais, A. and Al-Mahaidi, R. Experimental and finite element analysis of flexural performance of RC beams retrofitted using near-surface mounted with CFRP composites and cement adhesive. Engineering Structures 2021, 241, 112429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostofinejad D, Mahmoudabadi E. Grooving as alternative method of surface preparation to postpone debonding of FRP laminates in concrete beams. Journal of Composites for Construction 2010, 14, 804–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostofinejad D, Shameli SM, Hosseini A. EBROG and EBRIG methods for strengthening of RC beams by FRP sheets. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 2014, 18, 652–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshiri N, Tajmir-Riahi A, Mostofinejad D, Czaderski C, Motavalli M. Experimental and analytical study on CFRP strips-to-concrete bonded joints using EBROG method. Composites Part B: Engineering 2019, 158, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajmir-Riahi A, Moshiri N, Mostofinejad D. Bond mechanism of EBROG method using a single groove to attach CFRP sheets on concrete. Construction and Building Materials 2019, 197, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostofinejad D, Shameli SM. Externally bonded reinforcement in grooves (EBRIG) technique to postpone debonding of FRP sheets in strengthened concrete beams. Construction and Building Materials 2013, 38, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czaderski C, Moshiri N, Hosseini A. EBROG technique to enhance the bond performance of CFRP strips to concrete substrate. In SMAR 2019-Fifth conference on Smart Monitoring, assessment and rehabilitation of civil structures, 712 Potsdam Berlin, Germany; Potsdam: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Shomali A, Mostofinejad D, Esfahani MR. Experimental and numerical investigation of shear performance of RC beams strengthened with FRP using grooving method. Journal of Building Engineering 2020, 101409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostofinejad D, Hosseini SA, Razavi SB. Influence of different bonding and wrapping techniques on performance of beams strengthened in shear using CFRP reinforcement. Construction and Building Materials 2016, 116, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshiri N, Hosseini A, Mostofinejad D. Strengthening of RC columns by longitudinal CFRP sheets: Effect of strengthening technique. Construction and Building Materials 2015, 79, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostofinejad D, Moshiri N. Compressive strength of CFRP composites used for strengthening of RC columns: Comparative evaluation of EBR and grooving methods. Journal of Composites for Construction 2014, 19, 04014079. [Google Scholar]
- NoroozOlyaee M, Mostofinejad D. Slenderness Effects in Circular RC Columns Strengthened with CFRP Sheets Using Different External Bonding Techniques. Journal of Composites for Construction 2019, 23, 04018068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilia E, Mostofinejad D. Seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete strong beam–weak column joints using EBROG method combined with CFRP anchorage system. Engineering Structures 2019, 194, 300–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajmir-Riahi A, Mostofinejad D, Moshiri N. Bond resistance of a single groove in EBROG method to attach CFRP sheets on concrete. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in civil engineering (CICE 2018), Paris, France; 2018; pp. 368–373. [Google Scholar]
- Hosseini A, Mostofinejad D. Experimental investigation into bond behavior of CFRP sheets attached to concrete using EBR and EBROG techniques. Composites Part B: Engineering 2013, 51, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshiri N, Mostofinejad D, Tajmir-Riahi A. Bond behavior of pre-cured CFRP strips to concrete using externally bonded reinforcement on groove (EBROG) method. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in civil engineering (CICE 2018), Paris, France, 2018; pp. 361–367. [Google Scholar]
- Moshiri N, Czaderski C, Mostofinejad D, Motavalli M. Bond strength of prestressed CFRP strips to concrete substrate: comparative evaluation of EBR and EBROG methods. SMAR 2019-Fifth Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures. Potsdam, Berlin, Germany, 2019.
- Mostofinejad D, Mohammadi M. Effect of Freeze–Thaw Cycles on FRP-Concrete Bond Strength in EBR and EBROG Systems. Journal of Composites for Construction 2020, 24, 04020009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajmir-Riahi A, Moshiri N, Mostofinejad D. EBROG method to strengthen heat751damaged concrete with CFRP sheets. In SMAR 2019-Fifth Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures; Potsdam: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Moghaddas A, Mostofinejad D. Empirical FRP-Concrete Bond Strength Model for Externally Bonded Reinforcement on Grooves. Journal of Composites for Construction 2018, 23, 04018080. [Google Scholar]
- Amirezza, M. , Davood M., Alireza S. An empirical FRP-concrete bond-slip model for externally-bonded reinforcement on grooves. Construction and Building Materials Journal 2021, 281, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Heydari Mofrad M, Mostofinejad D, Hosseini A. A generic non-linear bond-slip model for CFRP composites bonded to concrete substrate using EBR and EBROG techniques. Composite Structures 2019, 220, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajmir-Riahi A, Moshiri N, Czaderski C, Mostofinejad D. Effect of the EBROG method on strip-to-concrete bond behavior. Construction and Building Materials 2019, 220, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niloufar M, et al. Bond Behavior of Prestressed CFRP Strips-to-Concrete Joints Using the EBROG Method: Experimental and Analytical Evaluation. Journal of Composites for Construction 2022, 27, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Shakiba Z, Davood M. , Nicolas F. Experimental evaluation of FRP-concrete bond using externally-bonded reinforcement on grooves (EBROG) method. Composite Structure Journal 2023, 310, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Fatemeh, M. and Davood M. Groove classification in EBROG FRP-to-concrete joints. Construction and Building Materials 2021, 275, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Fatemeh, M.; et al. Effect of Different Groove Classes Used in Externally Bonded Reinforcement on Grooves Joints on Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-to-Concrete Bond Behavior. 2022, 119, 123–140. [Google Scholar]
- Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-18; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
- Sika group. www.sika.
- Ali-Ahmad M, Subramaniam K, Ghosn M. Experimental investigation and fracture analysis of debonding between concrete and FRP sheets. J Eng Mech 2006, 132, 914–923. [Google Scholar]
- Mazzotti C, Savoia M, Ferracuti B. An experimental study on delamination of FRP plates bonded to concrete. Constr Build Mater 2008, 22, 1409–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17; ASTM International: 2017.
- Sena Cruz, J. and J. Barros. Modeling of bond between near-surface mounted CFRP laminate strips and concrete. Computers and Structures 2004, 82, 1513–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sena Cruz, J. and J. Barros. Bond Between Near-Surface Mounted Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminate Strips and Concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction 2004, 8, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
















| Groups Designation | No. of Specimens | Groove width mm | Groove depth mm | Distance between grooves mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1-R | 3 | Reference | - | - |
| G2-(2-4-20) | 3 | 2 | 4 | 20 |
| G3-(2-4-40) | 3 | 2 | 4 | 40 |
| G4-(4,4,40) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 40 |
| G5-(4-4-80) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 80 |
| G6-(6-4-40) | 3 | 6 | 4 | 40 |
| G7-(4-8-40) | 3 | 4 | 8 | 40 |
| G8-(4-12-40) | 3 | 4 | 12 | 40 |
| G(w,d,s): Group of Specimens, (width, depth, and spaces between grooves) | ||||
| Material | Dimensions (mm) |
f′c,(MPa) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Modulus of elasticity (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete | 41 | 3.86 | 25600 |
| Adhesive | Tensile strength (MPa) | Compressive strength (MPa) | Modulus of elasticity (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sikadur-31 | 30 | 60 | 4500 |
| Material | Dimensions (mm) |
Compressive strength, (MPa) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Modulus of elasticity (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFRP Laminate | 1.4x10 mm | 1200 | 2500 | 165,000 |
| Groups Designation | bg (mm) | dg (mm) | Sg (mm) | Pmax, avg. (kN) | % increase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1-R | -- | -- | -- | 7.53 | |
| G2-(2-4-20) | 2 | 4 | 20 | 13.0 | 72% |
| G3-(2-4-40) | 2 | 4 | 40 | 10.34 | 37% |
| G4-(4-4-40) | 4 | 4 | 40 | 12.07 | 60% |
| G5-(2-4-80) | 2 | 4 | 80 | 8.36 | 11% |
| G6-(6-4-40) | 6 | 4 | 40 | 14.08 | 86% |
| G7-(4-8-40) | 4 | 8 | 40 | 12.3 | 63% |
| G8-(4-12-40) | 4 | 12 | 40 | 12.1 | 60% |
| G-(bg, dg, Sg): Group of Specimens, (width, depth, and spaces between grooves) | |||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).