Submitted:
12 September 2024
Posted:
13 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
| Musty | Before Transformation | After Transformation | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organizational structure | Rigid hierarchical structure | Flexible team-based structure | Improved coordination and responsiveness |
| Management Team | Separate project management | A project team was formed specifically for fund management. | Faster and more focused decision making |
| Resource Allocation | Allocation is done centrally | Allocation based on specific village needs | Use of resources that is more appropriate to needs |
| Coordination | Limited, often hampered by bureaucracy | Improved with a responsive team | Improving efficiency in fund management |
| Decision-making | Slow and centralized process | Faster and decentralized processes | Faster and more local decisions |
| Indicator | Before the Change (%) | After the Change (%) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limited Formal Communication | 70 | 30 | -40 |
| Effectiveness of Fund Management | 60 | 85 | 25 |
| Information Flow | 55 | 80 | 25 |
| Frequency of Management Errors | 40 | 15 | -25 |
| Use of Information Technology | 45 | 75 | 30 |
| Aspect | Changes That Occur | Positive impact |
|---|---|---|
| Work Culture | From a work culture that is less supportive of individual initiative to a culture that is more inclusive and supportive of innovation. | Increase employee motivation. |
| Improve contribution to program success. | ||
| Organizational Values | Emphasis on collaboration, transparency and accountability. | Increasing employee involvement in village development programs. |
| Help employees feel valued. | ||
| Employee Engagement | Employees are actively involved in project planning and implementation. | Employee contributions to the program are more significant. |
| Employee motivation increases | ||
| Employee Motivation | New work culture and values influence employee motivation levels. | Increase work enthusiasm |
| Encourage higher engagement in the program |

4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Permatasari, P.; Ilman, A.S.; Tilt, C.A.; Lestari, D.; Islam, S.; Tenrini, R.H.; Rahman, A.B.; Samosir, A.P.; Wardhana, I.W. The Village Fund Program in Indonesia: Measuring the Effectiveness and Alignment to Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iranmanesh, M.; Kumar, K.M.; Foroughi, B.; Mavi, R.K.; Min, N.H. The impacts of organizational structure on operational performance through innovation capability: innovative culture as moderator. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2020, 15, 1885–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathews, M.C. How village leaders in rural Amazonia create bonding, bridging, and linking social capital configurations to achieve development goals, and why they are so difficult to maintain over time. World Dev. 2021, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanelt, A.; Bohnsack, R.; Marz, D.; Marante, C.A. A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. J. Manag. Stud. 2020, 58, 1159–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.-Y.; Sun, R.; Tao, W.; Lee, Y. Employee coping with organizational change in the face of a pandemic: The role of transparent internal communication. Public Relations Rev. 2020, 47, 101984–101984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuknor, S.C.; Bhattacharya, S. Inclusive leadership: new age leadership to foster organizational inclusion. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 2020, 46, 771–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koh, G.A.; Askell-Williams, H. Sustainable school-improvement in complex adaptive systems: A scoping review. Rev. Educ. 2020, 9, 281–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, X.; Yang, P.; Su, Q. On the effective organization of rural settlements spatial structure under the transformation and development of mountainous areas in Western China: evaluation measurement based on complex adaptability theory. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 30, 89945–89963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barauskaite, G.; Streimikiene, D. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2021, 28, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeho, F.H.; Prabowo, A.; Estiningtyas, R.A.; Mahadiansar, M.; Sentanu, I.G.E.P.S. Stakeholder collaboration to support accountability in village fund management and rural development. J. Socioecon. Dev. 2020, 3, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ijjasz-Vasquez, E.; Karp, P.; Weber-Fahr, M. Communities of Practice at the World Bank: Breaking Knowledge Silos to Catalyze Culture Change and Organizational Transformation. Taylor & Francis: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024.
- Goniewicz, K.; Khorram-Manesh, A.; Hertelendy, A.J.; Goniewicz, M.; Naylor, K.; Burkle, F.M., Jr. Current Response and Management Decisions of the European Union to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkley, J.; Beratan, K.K. Capturing practitioners' "how-to" knowledge in the form of recommendations for more effective planning of collaborative adaptive management projects. Ecol. Soc. 2021, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajibade, P.; Mutula, S.M. Promoting SMEs effectiveness through innovative communication strategies and business-IT alignment. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2020, 18, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Chen, J.; Li, S.; Li, Y.; Lu, J. A blockchain and IoT-based lightweight framework for enabling information transparency in supply chain finance. Digit. Commun. Networks 2022, 8, 576–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swart, K.; Bond-Barnard, T.; Chugh, R. Challenges and critical success factors of digital communication, collaboration and knowledge sharing in project management virtual teams: a review. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag. 2022, 10, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paais, M.; Pattiruhu, J.R. Effect of Motivation, Leadership, and Organizational Culture on Satisfaction and Employee Performance. J. Asian Finance, Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kör, B.; Wakkee, I.; van der Sijde, P. How to promote managers’ innovative behavior at work: Individual factors and perceptions. Technovation 2020, 99, 102127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, B.J.; Anwar, G. An Empirical Study of Employees’ Motivation and its Influence Job Satisfaction. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2021, 5, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z. How Do Smart Villages Become a Way to Achieve Sustainable Development in Rural Areas? Smart Village Planning and Practices in China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, Y.; Wang, H.; Huang, A.; Xu, Y.; Lu, L.; Ji, Z. Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural ‘production-living-ecological’ space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior–A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City. Land use policy 2021, 106, 105457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayat, K.; Hafeez, M.; Bilal, K.; Shabbir, M.S. Interactive Effects of Organizational Structure and Team Work Quality on Project Success in Project Based Non Profit Organizations. iRASD J. Manag. 2022, 4, 84–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahinsah-Wobil, I. “The Reform Mechanisms Policy in Ghana’s Public Financial Management,” Available SSRN 3922133, 2021.
- Morawiec, P.; Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz, A. Cloud Computing, Big Data, and Blockchain Technology Adoption in ERP Implementation Methodology. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Khatib, M.; Kherbash, A.; Al Qassimi, A.; Al Mheiri, K. How Can Collaborative Work and Collaborative Systems Drive Operational Excellence in Project Management? J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 2022, 15, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kremen, C. Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2020, 4, 229–240. [Google Scholar]
- Ortega-Rodríguez, C.; Licerán-Gutiérrez, A.; Moreno-Albarracín, A.L. Transparency as a Key Element in Accountability in Non-Profit Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, H.; Lu, Y.; Lyulyov, O.; Pimonenko, T. Good Governance within Public Participation and National Audit for Reducing Corruption. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, W.; Kim, C. A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antons, O.; Arlinghaus, J.C. Distributing decision-making authority in manufacturing – review and roadmap for the factory of the future. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022, 60, 4342–4360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkissoon, H. Perceived social impacts of tourism and quality-of-life: a new conceptual model. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 31, 442–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabet, N.S.; Khaksar, S. The performance of local government, social capital and participation of villagers in sustainable rural development. Soc. Sci. J. 2020, 61, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmini, N.K.; Mimba, P.S.H. The influence of apparatus competence, leadership style, tri hita karana culture and society participation on the effectiveness of village fund management. Indones. Account. Rev. 2021, 11, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taherdoost, H. A review on risk management in information systems: Risk policy, control and fraud detection. Electronics 2021, 10, 3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Aspect | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Organizational structure | The shift from hierarchical structures to leaner structures and project-based teams. | Allows for more targeted allocation of funds. |
| Internal Communication | Improved internal communication to be more open and transparent. | Reduce the risk of misallocation and increase the efficiency of fund use. |
| Management Practices | Use of information technology for project management and real-time reporting. | Improve coordination and efficiency in fund management. |
| Information Technology | Implementation of real-time project management applications and reporting systems. | Facilitates more accurate monitoring and reporting. |
| Aspect | Information |
|---|---|
| Changes in Work Culture | A work culture that emphasizes accountability and openness has increased compliance with regulations and transparency in the use of funds. |
| Transparency and Active Participation | A culture that supports transparency and active participation in internal oversight reduces irregularities and corruption. |
| Employee Engagement | Employees who are actively involved in decision-making and have open access to information demonstrate higher compliance with regulations. |
| Aspect | Information |
| Achievement of Development Targets | Changes in structure, communication patterns and work culture contribute to better achievement of development targets. |
| Socio-Economic Impact | There have been improvements in infrastructure, increased access to basic services, and community welfare as a result of development projects managed with a new approach. |
| Improvement of Quality of Life | Development projects managed using an organizational behavior approach show improvements in quality of life, income, and access to education and health. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).