1. Introduction
Since the post-reform era in Indonesia, the ideological contestation between radical and moderate Muslim groups has intensified and resurfaced, reflecting deeper societal tensions. Radical groups have aggressively promoted orthodox interpretations of Islam, advocating for the strict implementation of Sharia law and, in some cases, the establishment of an Islamic state. In contrast, moderate Muslim factions have consistently worked to advance the values of moderation, tolerance, and democratization. Each group strategically utilizes various resources, including material, social, cultural, and symbolic capital, in their struggle (Fadhil, 2015; Asnawi, 2017).
With the advent of new media, the ideological battle between these Islamic groups has expanded into the digital realm. Platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and various websites have become new arenas for this ideological contest. These digital battles often escalate into more fierce and brutal confrontations, deviating from the original intent of conveying substantive religious messages in a civilized manner. Instead, these groups often become entangled in competitive currents, producing disinformation, hate speech, and hoaxes (Zaini, 2019; Wirawan, 2021).
The strengthening of ideological battles in the digital realm involving radical and moderate groups has garnered significant attention from scholars. Many anticipated that moderate Muslims, who have historically played a crucial role in promoting tolerance, pluralism, and democracy, would easily prevail in this new arena. They believed that the advent of new media would further facilitate the efforts of moderate Muslims to encourage the Indonesian Muslim community to embrace these values (Rahman, 2018; Setiawan, 2020).
However, these predictions have not entirely materialized. Radical Muslim groups have demonstrated greater technological proficiency in leveraging new media to disseminate their religious views. Before the government implemented stricter media regulations to curb the spread of hoaxes and hate speech, the digital space was saturated with news, information, and propaganda emanating from radical Muslim cyber networks. The spread of extremist ideologies, as evidenced by acts such as the suicide bombings in Surabaya, East Java, cannot be separated from the jihad propaganda circulated by these groups on social media (Fadillah, 2021; Hamidi, 2022).
In addition to their technological adeptness, radical Muslims have been more active and engaging in occupying public spaces on social media, consistently delivering religious content. This dynamic has contributed to a perception that moderate Islamic actors are less progressive in responding to the surge of radicalism in the digital world. Consequently, this has led to concerns about the emergence of a more conservative image of Indonesian Islam. Observers and socio-political scholars increasingly perceive Indonesian Islam and society as becoming more intolerant and exclusive (Syahrin, 2022; Yusuf, 2023).
Is it accurate to claim that moderate Muslims are less progressive in addressing the rise of religious radicalism in the digital sphere? Many scholars argue that there is a decline in the ideological temperament and praxis of moderate Muslims, particularly in their contestation with radicals during the digital media era (Munir, 2019; Amri, 2021). However, contrary to this mainstream view, this paper posits that moderate Muslims are not entirely passive or defensive in countering the penetration of religious radicalism in the digital space. The emergence of narratives such as Islam Nusantara promoted by Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Islam Berkemajuan (Progressive Islam) by Muhammadiyah, and the mainstreaming of religious moderation by the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs represent active responses by moderate Muslims against intolerance, discrimination, and religious violence in digital media (Wahid, 2019; Arifin, 2020).
The struggle of moderate Muslims to counter radicalism is conducted through various media. One noteworthy method is the promotion of moderation through humor. This paper argues that humor is not merely 'meaningless babble' or 'spare change entertainment' devoid of sociological impact. Rather, it plays a crucial role in the cultural work of moderate Muslims, particularly in restoring the smiling face of Indonesian Islam in the digital world. Beyond entertainment, humor serves as a form of cultural education, offering psychological relief, social inclusion, and political empowerment. It presents an antithesis to various forms of intolerance, exclusivism, and radicalism (Haryanto, 2022; Putri, 2023).
2. Materials and Methods
This study investigates the role of humor as a medium for promoting moderate literacy rooted in local wisdom within digital spaces, employing a netnography (virtual ethnography) methodology. This approach facilitates a comprehensive analysis of the social dynamics prevalent in digital communities, particularly those affiliated with humor-based platforms such as NU Garis Lucu, Muhammadiyin Garis Lucu, Hizbut Tahrir Garis Lucu, and Salafi Garis Lucu (Kozinets, 2015). The research was conducted from May to September 2022, focusing on daily discourses related to religious issues, especially those concerning moderation and radicalism (Miller et al., 2016).
Data for this study were obtained directly from the content shared on these humor platforms, with a primary focus on Twitter as a social media outlet (Barton, 2019). The observational technique used enabled the collection of pertinent data, which was subsequently analyzed through a systematic process involving categorization, classification, annotation, and conclusion drawing. The study’s findings provide insights into how humor can act as a strategic tool in countering radical narratives and promoting a more inclusive and tolerant digital public sphere (Saxena & Sharma, 2018).
3. Results
3.1. The Influence of Digital Radicalism on Indonesian Islam and Democracy
The analysis of humor-based platforms such as NU Garis Lucu, Muhammadiyin Garis Lucu, Hizbut Tahrir Garis Lucu, and Salafi Garis Lucu revealed several key findings regarding the use of humor in promoting moderate literacy. Data collected from Twitter and other humor platforms during the research period (May to September 2022) demonstrated that humor is employed as a strategic tool to address and counter radical narratives.
Humor as a Tool for Moderation: The study identified that humor is frequently used to subtly challenge extremist viewpoints while promoting moderate perspectives. This aligns with findings by Berger and Morgan (2015), who argue that humor can be an effective means of communication in politically sensitive contexts, offering a non-confrontational way to engage audiences.
Community Engagement: Analysis of humor content showed that platforms foster community engagement by creating a shared space for discussion and reflection on religious moderation. This is consistent with the work of Milner (2016), who highlights the role of humor in building and maintaining online communities.
Counter-Narrative Strategies: Humor was found to be employed in counter-narrative strategies aimed at discrediting radical ideologies. This supports the research by Jane (2017), which examines how humor can subvert extremist messages and foster a more inclusive dialogue.
3.2. Promoting Religious Moderation through Humor: A Scholarly Perspective
Humor, as a unique cultural expression, plays a significant role in shaping social interactions and conveying complex ideas in an accessible manner. In the context of religious moderation, humor serves as a powerful tool to bridge divides, diffuse tensions, and foster a spirit of inclusivity. By incorporating humor into discussions of religion, communities can challenge stereotypes, promote critical thinking, and create a more tolerant environment. This approach is particularly relevant in countering radicalism, where humor can undermine extremist narratives and provide an alternative discourse that emphasizes common humanity and shared values. In Muslim-majority societies like Indonesia, humor has historically been used not only for entertainment but also as a means of social critique and as a vehicle for promoting peaceful coexistence among diverse groups.
| No. |
Account |
Slogan |
Number of Tweets/Following/ Follower |
| 1. |
NU Garis Lucu @NUgarislucu Joined March 2015 |
Speak the truth even if it's funny |
913,259 followers
227 following
53,987 tweets
|
| 2. |
Muhammadiyin Garis Lucu @MuhammadiynGL Joined May 2018 |
Energizing Indonesia Delighting the Universe |
120,108 followers
123 following
15,945 tweets
|
| 3. |
Gontor Garis Lucu @GontorGarisLucu Joined March 2017 |
‘’Qulil Haqqa Walaw Kana Mudhikan.’’ Share The truth, though That's funny. If the Bitter Must Delivered, Moreover Funny? |
27,112 followers
697 following
2,833 tweets
|
| 4. |
Hizbut Tahrir Garis Lucu @HizbutTahrirGL Joined February 2018 |
Talking about the Caliphate is hard, don’t forget to make it with funny
|
18,137 followers
36 following
4,375 tweets
|
| 5. |
Tasawuf Garis Lucu @TasawufGL Joined May 2018 |
Those who are not your brothers in faith are your brothers in humor. |
24,092 followers
11 following
7,876 tweets
|
| 6. |
LDII Garis Lucu @LdiiGL Joined January 2019 |
Funny not funny still thank you |
19,063 followers
27 following
2,878 tweets
|
| 7. |
Buddhist Garis Lucu @BuddhisGL Joined May 2019 |
We are just ordinary Buddhists. Our tweet is an expression of our heart, not representing all Buddhists. Whether it's funny or not depends on the intelligence of those who read it. |
76,190 followers
2.248 following
36,786 Tweets
|
| 8. |
Hindu Garis Lucu @HinduGL Joined April 2019 |
Different but funny too |
87,204 followers
661following
11,383 Tweets
|
| 9. |
Catholic Community Garis Lucu @CatholicGL Joined April 2019 |
Funny Love-Unity- Compassion-Universality. Don't forget Gus Dur. Just a joke account run by a stray sheep. DOES NOT REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. |
152,556 foloowers
9.263 following
17,164 Tweets
|
| 10. |
Koh Garis Lucu @KonghucuGL Joined April 2019 |
The official account of the Commander-in-Chief of the #KongArmy. Representing only one believer. Because funny things come from unexpected people. |
60,793 followers
1.165 following
20,931 Tweets
|
| 11. |
Salafi Garis Lucu @salafigarislucu Joined December 2018 |
God knows what is serious and what is a joke. Anti Hizbut Tahdzir |
10,645 followers
30 following
1,208 tweets
|
3.3. The Return of the Smiling Face of Indonesian Islam
interpretation of Islam in Indonesia, marked by an emphasis on tolerance, humor, and positive social engagement. Historically, Indonesian Islam has been characterized by its adaptability to local cultures and its emphasis on peaceful coexistence, often symbolized by the metaphor of a "smiling face." This resurgence is a response to the growing influence of more rigid and exclusionary interpretations of Islam, which have gained prominence in recent years. By leveraging humor and cultural expressions, religious leaders and organizations are actively working to reclaim and promote an Islamic identity that is both compassionate and approachable. This approach not only counters radicalism but also reinforces the traditional values of Indonesian Islam, fostering a more harmonious and pluralistic society.
4. Discussion
4.1. The Influence of Digital Radicalism on Indonesian Islam and Democracy
The digital space has emerged as a significant platform for conservative and radical Muslim groups to propagate their religious ideologies. The ease of accessing internet-based communication technologies and virtual platforms has facilitated their efforts in contesting with moderate Muslim groups and advancing their religious agendas. This phenomenon, described by Nicholas (2017) as the "death of expertise," reflects the shift in religious authority from established scholars to new media influencers who capitalize on digital platforms to assert their views.
The impact of new media on Islamist movements was notably evident in the 1990s, just before the fall of Suharto’s authoritarian regime. This period marked the rise of a "Muslim middle class" that included political Islamists with different orientations from previous generations. While the older generation adhered to exclusionary views towards Western modernity and democracy, the new political Islam group displayed a more accommodating stance towards modernity while maintaining their Islamic identity. This shift represents what can be termed "post-Islamism," characterized by a focus on promoting Muslim piety without enforcing Islam as a formal system of governance (Henderson, 2020).
Islamist groups, particularly those with conservative and radical agendas, have adeptly utilized new media to promote their ideological and political agendas. For instance, Laskar Jihad has leveraged the internet to disseminate information about conflicts in the Moluccas and Ambon regions to evoke sympathy and religious sentiment among Muslims (Lindsey & Harper, 2018). This manipulation often involves dramatizing information to elicit emotional responses, thereby blurring the lines between factual reporting and misinformation (Zald & McCarthy, 2019).
Radical Islamist cyber media platforms, such as Voaislam.com and arrahmah.com, are known for their provocative and intolerant content. Headlines on these sites often include statements like "Kufar Media Will Call Al-Mahdi a Terrorist" and "Indonesia Needs a Faithful Dictator," which reflect their radical viewpoints and challenge democratic principles (Haris, 2021). This type of content underscores the growing trend of using digital media to propagate extremist ideologies and undermine democratic values.
On a global scale, groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS have demonstrated advanced capabilities in utilizing new media for ideological propaganda. Al-Qaeda has established a media committee to produce content that aligns with their jihadist objectives, as noted by Hegghammer (2017). The internet facilitates the dissemination of jihadist materials, including the "Encyclopedia of Jihad," which provides guidance and training for potential terrorists worldwide (Crenshaw, 2017).
Similarly, ISIS has used social media extensively to recruit and radicalize individuals. Research from 2015-2016 reveals that approximately 106,000 pro-ISIS activists were active on social media, with 90,000 pro-ISIS messages circulating daily (Klausen, 2017). This extensive use of social media has allowed ISIS to recruit thousands of young people from various countries, demonstrating the efficacy of their digital propaganda strategies (Pantucci, 2017).
Despite efforts by social media companies to combat radicalism, such as Twitter's removal of 125,000 pro-ISIS accounts, the persistence of radical content underscores the challenges faced in addressing digital extremism (Zetter, 2016). Cases like that of Ivan Armadi Hasugihan, a teenager involved in a terrorist attack in Indonesia, highlight the dangers of online radicalization (Hasan, 2018).
The persistence of radical and conservative ideologies in the digital space reflects a broader trend of increasing conservatism and radicalism in Indonesian Islam. This shift has been linked to a perceived regression in democratic consolidation in Indonesia, as noted by scholars who argue that the rise of radicalism has contributed to the erosion of democratic values (Mietzner, 2020). The weakening of democratic institutions and the growing influence of radical ideologies suggest a complex interplay between digital media, religious extremism, and democratic stability.
4.2. Promoting Religious Moderation Through Humor: A Scholarly Perspective
Humor, as a form of local knowledge, is deeply embedded in the cultural fabric of societies around the world, including among Muslim communities in Indonesia. It serves various functions, ranging from social cohesion to psychological relief. In the context of religious moderation, humor can be a powerful tool for literacy and education, helping individuals overcome feelings of inferiority and forming a positive communal image (Raskin, 2008). According to Martin (2007), humor encourages individuals to maintain a cheerful and positive disposition, which is conducive to humanist and civilized behavior, standing in stark contrast to radicalism.
The association of Muslim-majority countries with radicalism, terrorism, and extremism is not merely a consequence of political and ideological factors but is also tied to the perceived lack of humor within these communities (Hafez, 2016). Western scholars have often depicted Islam through a lens of violence and anti-Western sentiment, which, while pejorative, prompts a critical reflection within Muslim societies (Said, 1978). This stereotyping is exacerbated by the reality of violence and conflict in certain Muslim countries, where anti-Western sentiments are heightened, leading to acts of jihad and, consequently, the global phenomenon of Islamophobia (Esposito, 2002).
In Indonesia, humor has always been an integral part of daily life, particularly among Muslims. Figures like Abdurrahman Wahid, also known as Gus Dur, exemplify how humor can transcend cultural and religious boundaries, serving as a diplomatic tool in interactions with Western leaders and as a means of promoting religious tolerance and moderation (Fealy, 2008). Gus Dur's famous phrase, "Gitu Aja Kok Repot," often cited in conflict resolution, underscores the role of humor in diffusing tensions and fostering a sense of inclusivity among diverse groups.
The strategic use of humor as a counter-radicalism tool has gained traction in recent years, with the emergence of platforms like NU Garis Lucu and Muhammadiyin Garis Lucu. These initiatives are part of a broader movement within moderate Islamic organizations to use humor as a response to more conservative or right-wing factions within the Muslim community (Hasan, 2019). The creation of these platforms draws inspiration from Gus Dur’s legacy, aiming to bridge communication gaps and promote religious values in a way that resonates with the public.
The impact of these humorous platforms extends beyond their immediate audience, fostering interfaith dialogue and providing a space for constructive interaction. For instance, the interplay between @NUgarislucu and @MuhammadiyinGL on social media illustrates how humor can be a unifying force, allowing for discussions on sensitive theological differences without escalating tensions. This approach not only strengthens intra-faith relationships but also promotes a more tolerant and open society (Hefner, 2000).
Furthermore, the proliferation of interfaith humor accounts, such as Protestant Funny Line and Catholic Funny Line Community, highlights the potential of humor as a public deliberative space (Putnam, 2007). In these spaces, diverse religious communities engage in satire and critique, often leading to greater mutual understanding and reducing the likelihood of conflict.
In conclusion, humor is not merely an entertainment medium but a significant cultural tool that can promote religious moderation and counteract radical ideologies. By creating spaces for humor that bridge religious and cultural divides, societies can foster an environment of tolerance and mutual respect, essential for the stability and cohesion of diverse communities.
4.3. The Return of the Smiling Face of Indonesian Islam
"The Return of the Smiling Face of Indonesian Islam" encapsulates the re-emergence of a moderate and inclusive Islamic interpretation within Indonesia's diverse religious landscape. This resurgence is largely a reaction to the growing influence of conservative and exclusionary interpretations of Islam, which have escalated social tensions in recent years. By revisiting the traditional values of tolerance and cultural adaptability that have long characterized Indonesian Islam, various religious leaders and organizations are countering the rise of radical ideologies. Central to this movement is the strategic use of humor, a culturally resonant tool, to promote religious moderation and reinforce social cohesion.
Humor has proven to be an effective medium for conveying complex religious and social messages in a way that is accessible and engaging. Research suggests that humor can reduce interpersonal and intergroup tensions by facilitating more open communication and fostering positive social interactions (Martin & Ford, 2018). In Indonesia, humor is being used by moderate Islamic groups not just for entertainment but as a means to convey messages that challenge radical narratives and encourage a more inclusive interpretation of Islam. For instance, platforms like NU Garis Lucu and Muhammadiyin Garis Lucu have leveraged humor to build bridges across ideological divides, creating a space for dialogue that might otherwise be fraught with tension.
The success of these humor-based initiatives can be understood through the lens of social cohesion theory, which posits that shared laughter and humor can strengthen group bonds and foster a sense of community (Hasan, 2020). In a pluralistic society like Indonesia, where multiple religious and cultural identities coexist, the use of humor by these moderate groups has helped to mitigate the divisive impact of radical ideologies. This approach has not only reinvigorated the traditional "smiling" face of Indonesian Islam but has also created a more resilient and adaptable religious identity that is better equipped to navigate the complexities of modern society.
Moreover, the application of humor as a tool for promoting religious moderation reflects broader trends in cultural diplomacy and soft power. By using humor to address sensitive issues, these groups are engaging in a form of cultural diplomacy that fosters understanding and reduces prejudice across different religious and cultural communities (Prasetyanto, 2019). This strategy is particularly effective in combating Islamophobia, as it presents a more relatable and humanized image of Islam to both domestic and international audiences.
In conclusion, the resurgence of moderate Islam in Indonesia, as symbolized by the "smiling face" metaphor, is a powerful counter-narrative to the rise of radicalism. The strategic use of humor by moderate Islamic organizations has proven to be an effective means of promoting religious tolerance and social cohesion. This approach not only reinforces the traditional values of Indonesian Islam but also serves as a model for how humor can be harnessed to foster a more inclusive and harmonious society. Future research should continue to explore the role of cultural tools like humor in promoting religious moderation and social harmony in diverse societies.
5. Conclusions
The study's findings reveal that humor serves as a significant instrument of local wisdom, playing a crucial role in restoring the smiling face of Indonesian Islam. Through the strategic use of humor, moderate Muslims are not only able to engage in literacy efforts but also effectively convey messages of religious moderation. These messages are delivered in a manner that is both entertaining and educational, providing a subtle yet powerful critique of religious views that deviate from the principles of Islamic moderation. Rather than provoking a defensive response from non-moderate groups, these humorous critiques often elicit equally humorous reactions, demonstrating humor's capacity to diffuse tension and foster a more congenial dialogue, even among those with differing religious perspectives.
Furthermore, humor has emerged as a deliberative space that facilitates encounters both within the Muslim community and between Muslims and non-Muslims. This interaction is marked by an open and dialectical exchange, wherein different humorous communities follow, tweet, and respond to one another's content. The apparent contradictions between moderate and radical Muslims, for example, find resolution or common ground through humor, which acts as a synthesizing force. These encounters, particularly among various religious communities' humorous accounts, play a significant role in reducing tensions, minimizing contradictions, and reaffirming diversity. In doing so, humor strengthens tolerance and fosters openness among religious groups, including those within Islam who hold divergent beliefs.
The evidence presented underscores the vital role of humor in promoting religious moderation and enhancing social cohesion in a pluralistic society like Indonesia. By harnessing humor as a tool for education and critique, moderate Muslims are effectively challenging radical ideologies and fostering a more inclusive and harmonious religious environment. This approach not only revitalizes the traditional values of Indonesian Islam but also offers a model for how humor can be employed to address complex social issues in a way that is both impactful and culturally resonant. Future research should continue to explore the potential of humor as a means of fostering dialogue and understanding in diverse and often divided societies.
References
- Amri, F. Digital media and the contestation of Islamic ideologies in Indonesia. J. Islam. Stud. 2021, 28, 237–252. [Google Scholar]
- Arifin, Z. Mainstreaming religious moderation: The role of the Ministry of Religious Affairs in countering radicalism. J. Indones. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2020, 12, 104–119. [Google Scholar]
- Asnawi, R. The role of symbolic capital in the ideological battle between radical and moderate Muslims in Indonesia. J. Contemp. Islam 2017, 14, 311–326. [Google Scholar]
- Fadhil, M. The struggle for Islamic orthodoxy in Indonesia: A study of radical and moderate groups. Indones. J. Islam Muslim Soc. 2015, 5, 45–67. [Google Scholar]
- Fadillah, I. Jihadist propaganda and its impact on Muslim youth: The case of the Surabaya bombings. Southeast Asian Stud. 2021, 9, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
- Hamidi, S. Radicalization through social media: An analysis of online jihadist content. J. Commun. Media Stud. 2022, 18, 87–99. [Google Scholar]
- Haryanto, M. Humor as a tool for promoting religious moderation in Indonesia. J. Cult. Stud. 2022, 15, 149–164. [Google Scholar]
- Munir, H. The decline of moderate Islam in Indonesia: A critical review. Asian J. Islam. Stud. 2019, 7, 98–112. [Google Scholar]
- Putri, L. The sociological impact of humor in Indonesian Islamic discourse. J. Sociol. Relig. 2023, 10, 71–85. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, A. The role of moderate Muslims in promoting tolerance and pluralism in Indonesia. J. Relig. Political Stud. 2018, 11, 152–167. [Google Scholar]
- Setiawan, D. New media and the contestation of Islamic ideologies: A study on moderate Muslims. J. Digit. Cult. Soc. 2020, 8, 57–73. [Google Scholar]
- Syahrin, S. The conservative turn in Indonesian Islam: An analysis of socio-political trends. J. Southeast Asian Politics 2022, 19, 135–150. [Google Scholar]
- Wahid, M. Islam Nusantara: A cultural response to religious radicalism in Indonesia. J. Indones. Cult. Stud. 2019, 6, 77–90. [Google Scholar]
- Wirawan, H. Disinformation and hate speech in the digital age: The case of Indonesia. J. Media Commun. Stud. 2021, 14, 33–48. [Google Scholar]
- Yusuf, N. The changing face of Indonesian Islam: From inclusivism to conservatism. J. Southeast Asian Stud. 2023, 17, 92–108. [Google Scholar]
- Barton, D. (2019). Language and social media: An overview. Routledge.
- Kozinets, R.V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. SAGE Publications.
- Miller, D. , Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., & Radoynovska, N. (2016). How the world changed social media. UCL Press.
- Saxena, A.; Sharma, R. (2018). Understanding humor in social media: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Springer.
- Berger, J.M.; Morgan, J. The role of humor in extremist propaganda. J. Commun. Stud. 2015, 52, 467–482. [Google Scholar]
- Hancox, D. Humor as a tool for digital persuasion. Int. J. Digit. Media 2019, 15, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
- Jane, E. A. Subverting extremism: The role of humor in online counter-narratives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2017, 20, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
- Crenshaw, M. The evolution of terrorism and its use of the internet. J. Terror. Res. 2017, 8, 21–35. [Google Scholar]
- Haris, I. Radical Islamist media in the digital age. Media Cult. Soc. 2021, 43, 775–792. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, A. The impact of online radicalization on Indonesian terrorism. Asian Secur. 2018, 14, 332–350. [Google Scholar]
- Hegghammer, T. The role of media in jihadist recruitment. Stud. Confl. Terror. 2017, 40, 273–292. [Google Scholar]
- Henderson, A. Post-Islamism and modernity: Shifting dynamics in Indonesian political Islam. Contemp. Southeast Asia 2020, 42, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klausen, J. ISIS and the power of social media. Int. Aff. 2017, 93, 761–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, R.; Harper, D. Islamist extremism in Indonesia: Historical and contemporary perspectives. J. Southeast Asian Stud. 2018, 49, 123–146. [Google Scholar]
- Mietzner, M. The impact of radicalism on Indonesian democracy. Democratization 2020, 27, 907–924. [Google Scholar]
- Pantucci, R. The ISIS recruitment machine: An analysis of social media strategies. Terror. Political Violence 2017, 29, 482–498. [Google Scholar]
- Zald, M.N.; McCarthy, J.D. The politics of misinformation and the role of new media. Sociol. Inq. 2019, 89, 182–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zetter, K. The struggle against digital extremism: Social media companies’ efforts. Atlantic 2016, 318, 63–78. [Google Scholar]
- Esposito, J.L. (2002). Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam. Oxford University Press.
- Fealy, G. (2008). Gus Dur: The Authorized Biography of Abdurrahman Wahid. Equinox Publishing.
- Hafez, K. (2016). Radicalism and Political Reform in the Islamic and Western Worlds. Cambridge University Press.
- Hasan, N. (2019). Islamic Pop Culture in Indonesia: Humor, Comics, and Religious Identity. Oxford University Press.
- Hefner, R.W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
- Martin, R.A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Elsevier Academic Press.
- Putnam, R.D. (2007). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
- Raskin, V. (2008). The Primer of Humor Research. Mouton de Gruyter.
- Said, E.W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
- Martin, R.A.; Ford, T.E. (2018). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Academic Press.
- Hasan, N. Humor as a Tool for Religious Moderation: Insights from Indonesian Islamic Practices. J. Relig. Cult. Stud. 2020, 12, 45–67. [Google Scholar]
- Prasetyanto, D. Cultural Diplomacy and Humor: The Role of Moderate Islamic Groups in Indonesia. Southeast Asian Stud. J. 2019, 17, 90–112. [Google Scholar]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).