Submitted:
02 September 2024
Posted:
03 September 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparing Datasets
2.1.1. Community Multiscale Air Quality
2.1.2. Control Matrix
2.2. Emulating CMAQ Simulation
2.2.1. Conditional U-Net Architecture
2.2.2. Gridding Strategy
2.3. Evaluation Methods
2.3.1. Performance Metrics
2.3.2. Contribution Analysis Using SHAP Value
2.4. Health Impact Assessment
2.4.1. BenMAP-CE Methodology
- Air quality data (monitored or modeled)
- Detailed population demographics
- Baseline health incidence rates
- Concentration-response functions from the epidemiological literature
- Economic valuation methods
2.4.2. Input Parameters of Health Impact Assessment
3. Results
3.1. Emulation Performance Evaluation
3.1.1. Emulation Results
3.1.2. Input Contribution Analysis
3.1.3. Computational Performance
3.2. Health Impact Assessment
4. Discussion and Conclusions
- Development of a CMAQ Emulator Using a Conditional U-Net
- Health Impact Assessment and Policy Implications
- Limitations and Future Research
- Overall Summary and Conclusion
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- National Assembly Budget Office. Analysis of Air Quality and Budget Allocation in South Korea, 2019. Accessed on 2024/08/23.
- Special Act On The Reduction And Management Of Fine Dust Act of 2018. §33491, 2018. Accessed on 2024/08/23.
- US EPA Office of Research and Development. CMAQ: The Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Xing, J.; Wang, S.X.; Jang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Hao, J.M. Nonlinear response of ozone to precursor emission changes in China: a modeling study using response surface methodology. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2011, 11, 5027–5044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Xing, J.; Jang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, J.S.; Hao, J. Impact Assessment of Ammonia Emissions on Inorganic Aerosols in East China Using Response Surface Modeling Technique. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45, 9293–9300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, J.; Ding, D.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Jang, C.; Wu, W.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, Y.; Hao, J. Quantification of the enhanced effectiveness of NOx control from simultaneous reductions of VOC and NH3 for reducing air pollution in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2018, 18, 7799–7814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, J.; Zheng, S.; Ding, D.; Kelly, J.T.; Wang, S.; Li, S.; Qin, T.; Ma, M.; Dong, Z.; Jang, C.; et al. Deep Learning for Prediction of the Air Quality Response to Emission Changes. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54, 8589–8600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.Z.; Zhang, H.R.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, J.Y.; Xu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.C. Approximating Three-Dimensional (3-D) Transport of Atmospheric Pollutants via Deep Learning. Earth and Space Science 2022, 9, e2022EA002338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salman, A.K.; Choi, Y.; Park, J.; Mousavinezhad, S.; Payami, M.; Momeni, M.; Ghahremanloo, M. Deep learning based emulator for simulating CMAQ surface NO2 levels over the CONUS. Atmospheric Environment 2024, 316, 120192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacks, J.D.; Lloyd, J.M.; Zhu, Y.; Anderton, J.; Jang, C.J.; Hubbell, B.; Fann, N. The Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program - Community Edition (BenMAP-CE): A tool to estimate the health and economic benefits of reducing air pollution. Environ Model Softw 2018, 104, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacks, J.; Coffman, E.; Rappold, A.G.; Anderton, J.; Amend, M.; Baker, K.; Fann, N. A Proof-Of-Concept Approach for Quantifying Multipollutant Health Impacts Using Joint Effects Models within the Open-Source BenMAP-CE Software Program. ISEE Conference Abstracts 2018, 2018, https. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, J.; Jain, A.; Abbeel, P. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. CoRR 2020, abs/2006.11239, [2006.11239].
- Rombach, R.; Blattmann, A.; Lorenz, D.; Esser, P.; Ommer, B. High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models. CoRR 2021, abs/2112.10752, [2112.10752].
- Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Korea. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport Continental Map, 2017, [https://www.data.go.kr/data/15056910/openapi.do]. Accessed: 2024-04-30.
- Lundberg, S.; Lee, S.I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. arXiv 2017, arXiv:cs.AI/1705.07874]. [Google Scholar]
- Vega García, M.; Aznarte, J.L. Shapley additive explanations for NO2 forecasting. Ecological Informatics 2020, 56, 101039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stirnberg, R.; Cermak, J.; Kotthaus, S.; Haeffelin, M.; Andersen, H.; Fuchs, J.; Kim, M.; Petit, J.E.; Favez, O. Meteorology-driven variability of air pollution (PM1) revealed with explainable machine learning. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2021, 21, 3919–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wu, C.; Meadows, M.E.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Z.; Chi, Y.; Feng, M.; Li, E.; Hu, Y. Factors Underlying Spatiotemporal Variations in Atmospheric PM2.5 Concentrations in Zhejiang Province, China. Remote Sensing 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Zhang, Q.; Peng, Y.; Guan, X.; Li, L.; Mu, J.; Wang, X.; Yin, X.; Wang, Q. Contributions of various driving factors to air pollution events: Interpretability analysis from Machine learning perspective. Environment International 2023, 173, 107861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, C.D.; Zhu, J.J.; Hsu, C.Y.; Shie, R.H. Quantifying source contributions to ambient NH3 using Geo-AI with time lag and parcel tracking functions. Environment International 2024, 185, 108520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Statistics Korea. Population Projections for Korea, Projected Population by Age(Province). https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1BPB001&conn_path=I2, 2024. Accessed 2024-08-12.
- Statistics Korea. Causes of Death Statistics, Deaths and Death rates by cause(104 item), sex, and age(five-year age): province. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1B34E11&conn_path=I2, 2022. Accessed 2024-08-12.
- Hoek, G.; Krishnan, R.M.; Beelen, R.; Peters, A.; Ostro, B.; Brunekreef, B.; Kaufman, J.D. Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio- respiratory mortality: a review. Environmental health 2013, 12, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO. AirQ+: software tool for health risk assessment of air pollution. [accessed 2018 Oct 02] http:// www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/air-quality/activities/airq-software-tool-for-health- risk-assessment-of-air-pollution 2018.
- Baek, J.Y. Contributions of domestic and foreign emissions to high PM2.5 concentrations in urban and background areas in Korea. Jeju National University, /: thesis, [https, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, N.; Johnson, J.; Yarwood, G.; Woo, J.H.; Kim, Y.; Park, R.J.; Jeong, J.I.; Kang, S.; Chun, S.; Knipping, E. Contributions of domestic sources to PM2.5 in South Korea. Atmospheric Environment 2022, 287, 119273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thunis, P.; Clappier, A.; Beekmann, M.; Putaud, J.P.; Cuvelier, C.; Madrazo, J.; de Meij, A. Non-linear response of PM2.5 to changes in NOx and NH3 emissions in the Po basin (Italy): consequences for air quality plans. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2021, 21, 9309–9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, J.T.; Jang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Long, S.; Xing, J.; Wang, S.; Murphy, B.N.; Pye, H.O.T. Predicting the Nonlinear Response of PM2.5 and Ozone to Precursor Emission Changes with a Response Surface Model. Atmosphere 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- US EPA Office of Research and Development. CMAQv4.7.1, 2017. [CrossRef]
- Abadi, M.; Agarwal, A.; Barham, P.; Brevdo, E.; Chen, Z.; Citro, C.; Corrado, G.S.; Davis, A.; Dean, J.; Devin, M.; et al. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems, 2015. Software available from tensorflow.org.







| Region name | NOx | SO2 | VOC | NH3 | PM2.5 | Activity |
| Seoul | 0.514 | 0.927 | 0.945 | 0.692 | 1.109 | - |
| Incheon | 0.611 | 1.087 | 0.949 | 0.546 | 0.778 | - |
| Busan | 0.504 | 1.364 | 1.046 | 1.192 | 1.249 | - |
| Daegu | 1.274 | 0.951 | 0.708 | 1.247 | 0.786 | - |
| Gwangju | 0.872 | 1.069 | 0.621 | 0.840 | 1.497 | - |
| Gyeonggi-do | 0.574 | 1.379 | 1.436 | 0.842 | 1.177 | - |
| Gangwon-do | 1.479 | 1.167 | 0.540 | 1.098 | 1.173 | - |
| Chungbuk-do | 1.134 | 0.710 | 0.725 | 1.410 | 0.503 | - |
| Chungnam-do | 0.520 | 0.562 | 0.812 | 1.021 | 0.994 | - |
| Gyeongbuk-do | 1.063 | 1.073 | 1.192 | 1.343 | 1.045 | - |
| Gyeongnam-do | 0.581 | 1.337 | 1.057 | 0.811 | 0.671 | - |
| Jeonbuk-do | 0.702 | 1.286 | 0.580 | 1.150 | 1.063 | - |
| Jeonnam-do | 1.311 | 1.187 | 1.001 | 1.281 | 0.805 | - |
| Jeju-do | 1.034 | 1.224 | 1.395 | 0.520 | 0.752 | - |
| Daejeon | 1.173 | 0.718 | 1.386 | 0.762 | 0.864 | - |
| Ulsan | 1.197 | 0.919 | 0.528 | 1.284 | 0.534 | - |
| Sejong | 0.996 | 1.394 | 0.549 | 0.787 | 1.343 | - |
| Boundary | - | - | - | - | - | 1.000 |
| Target year | Target Region | Metrics [Units] | Data category | Score |
| 2019 | South Korea | MAE [] | Training set | 0.222 |
| Test set | 0.221 | |||
| NMAE [%] | Training set | 1.788 | ||
| Test set | 1.762 | |||
| [-] | Training set | 0.996 | ||
| Test set | 0.996 |
| Method | Processor | Batch size | Time consumed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMAQ v4.7 | CPU (simulation) | - | ∼ 24h / scenario |
| Conditional U-Net | CPU (training) | 256 | ∼ 10s / epoch |
| GPU (training) | 256 | ∼ 1s / epoch | |
| CPU (prediction) | 32 | ∼ 10ms / scenario | |
| GPU (prediction) | 32 | ∼ 1ms / scenario |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).