Preprint
Brief Report

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Empirical Mass Formula for Charged Leptons

Submitted:

19 August 2024

Posted:

19 August 2024

Read the latest preprint version here

Abstract
An explicit mass formula for charged leptons is proposed which employes the $(2 \ell +1)$ degeneracy of the $SU(2)$ Laplacian of quantum mechanics. Possible cosmological implications are briefly discussed.
Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

The immense difference between the individual masses of charged leptons and the appearance of generations in particle physics still appears to be a mystery. This short paper intents to shed some light on the appearance of generations in particle physics. A mass formula for charged leptons is proposed which interpolates between De Broglie–Vigier ideas on “hidden” internal degrees of freedom and (gauge) group concepts.

2. Product Formula

Here we propose the product formula
m N = Π = 0 N 1 2 ( 2 1 ) ( 2 + 1 ) 2 MeV
for the charged leptons, where is an angular momentum eigenvalue and N 3 the number of generations. This is only aproximate and in the need of “radiative corrections”.
On the other hand, hypothetical topological excitations of the electron would also lead to a product formula
m ˜ N = 4 π 16 π / 3 N 1 m e
for N 2 in terms of the volumes of apropiate fibre bundles [4].

3. Next Generation Lepton Masses?

In view of (1), the electron starts with m e = 0.5 MeV, about the experimentally established value. Accordingly, the tau lepton is 2 × 9 = 18 times heavier than the muon which itselve is 8 × 25 = 200 more massive than the elctron, cf. Ne’eman et al. [10], p. 247.
Thus we find the masses 0.5 , 100 , 1800 MeV which are rather close to the experimental values of the known charged leptons.
If a next generation lepton L ± would exist, according to our formula (1), it would be 32 × 49 = 1568 times heavier than the tau, i.e., m L = 5.6448 TeV. This is well above the lower bound of 100.8 GeV from current searches in particle accelerators, cf. the Particle Data Group [9].
A hypothetical 5th generation lepton would aquire an “astronomically” large mass of 128 × 81 = 10 , 368 times the predicted value of the L ± as it has been dubbed here. Even in the decay of cosmic rays, this PeV range would remain rather difficult to detect even in the future.
Let us compare this with the rather precise lepton mass formula of Barut
m ˜ / m e = 1 + 1 20 α ( 2 + 1 ) ( + 1 ) [ 3 ( + 1 ) 1 ]
in the equivalent representation [7] for = N 1 and α Sommerfeld’s fine structure constant. However, it would predict a rather low mass of about m L 10 GeV and should have already been seen in current searches for next generation charged leptons.

4. New Cosmos?

Our rather exotic formula (1) would indicate an internal “hidden” sub-structure of leptons, as considered earlier by Vigier et al. [1]. As in the angular momentum operator of S U ( 2 ) S O ( 3 ) , the eigenfunctions of the electron excitations would be 2 + 1 degenerate.
On the other hand, if nature restricts herself to precisely three generations, the known leptons could be accomodated in irreducible spinor representations of a S O ( 10 ) unification of gauge groups. This may also indicate a lower dimensional topology of the early Universe and a Chern-Simons like gravitational term [2], cf. also the Mielke–Baekler model [8]. This might also facilitate the conformal representation of the initial condition (“Big Bang”) in Penrose’s model [11] of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology. It is not clear if conformal transformations a la Weyl could resolve discrepancies [3] in the cosmological parameters like the Hubble constant H 0 or the recent observations of massive galaxies at high redshift via the James Weph Space Telescope (JSWT).
The scale-invariant normalized sum and product of known charged lepton masses can be related to vacuum expectations values < > of a hypothetical U ( 3 ) nonet of scalar fields. Then the emperical mass spectrum can be understood as originating from a specific choice of scalar potentials [6]. In this scheme, possible higher generations are so far lacking, however.
A beyond 3 generation standard model would require also heavy quarks and cannot co-exist with relatively light Higgs particle of 125 GeV in the standard model, cf. Holdom [5].

References

  1. Amoroso, R.L.; Kauffman, L.H.; Rauscher, E.A.; Rowlands, P.; Vigier, J.-P. Vigier: “Hidden” Parameters Describing Internal Motion Within Extended Particle Elements. In AIP Proceedings; American Institute of Physics, 2010; Volume 1316, pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. van der Bij, J.J. Cosmotopological relation for a unified field theory. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 76, 121702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stacy, S. McGaugh: Discord in Concordance Cosmology and Anomalously Massive Early Galaxies. Universe 2024, 10, 48. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gustavo, R. Gonzalez-Martin: Lepton and meson masses. arXiv 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Holdom, B. Approaching a strong fourth family. Physics Letters B 2010, 686, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koide, Y.; Yamashita, T. Charged lepton mass relations in a SUSY scenario. Physics Letters B 2018, 787, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mielke, E.W. Empirical verification of recently proposed hadron mass formulas, Z. Naturforsch, 1981; 36a, 1315–1318. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mielke, E.W. Geometrodynamics of Gauge Fields: On the Geometry of Yang-Mills and Gravitational Gauge Theories" (Mathematical Physics Studies), 2nd ed.; Springer, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Navas, S.; et al. (Particle Data Group). Phys. Rev. D 2024, 110, 030001. [CrossRef]
  10. Yuval Ne’eman and Yoram Kirsh. The Particle Hunters, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press, August 2012; ISBN 978-0-521-47686-7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Penrose, R. On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 2: Conformal Cyclic Cosmology. Found Phys 2014, 44, 873–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gurzadyan, V.G.; Penrose, R. CCC and the Fermi paradox. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 2016, 131, 1. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated