Submitted:
14 August 2024
Posted:
16 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Hounsfield Mechanical Testing Equipment
- Main frame, the basic structure that supports all other components of the equipment;
- Drive unit, a system consisting of an electric motor and a screw transmission to apply the necessary force to the sample;
- Load cell, the sensor that measures the force applied to the sample;
- Clamping devices (clamps), which secure the sample in the testing position;
- Control and display system, which includes a computer or a controller that allows the user to set the test parameters and monitor the data in real time;
- Extensometer, a device used to measure the deformation of the sample during the test;
- Hounsfield equipment software streamlines the testing and material analysis process, providing precise and easy-to-interpret results. It allows for the configuration and control of mechanical tests, setting parameters such as the speed of load application, load limits, and test endpoints.
2.2. Load Cell
2.3. Penetration Cones
2.4. The Cheeses Varieties
2.5. Moisture Content
2.6. Software
2.7. The Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. The Visual Inspection
3.2. Penetration Tests
- Camembert (speed 12 mm/min): The force increases steadily with the penetration depth up to approximately 10 mm, after which it stabilizes; the maximum displacement reached at the maximum force is 13.70 mm.
- Brie (speed 30 mm/min): A steeper increase in force is noted compared to Camembert, reaching a plateau after approximately 9 mm; the maximum force is reached at the maximum displacement of 13.19 mm.
- Dorblue/Roquefort (speed 60 mm/min): The increase in force is even steeper, reaching a plateau after approximately 8 mm, and the maximum force is reached at the maximum penetration depth of 12.30 mm. The increasing the penetration speed leads to a more rapid increase in the applied force, indicating greater resistance to initial deformation. This is especially evident at the speed of 60 mm/min for Dorblue/Roquefort.
- Camembert, having a softer texture, shows a smooth increase in force;
- Brie, being slightly firmer, exhibits a more rapid increase in force;
- Dorblue, with a denser structure and higher mold content, presents the greatest resistance to penetration;
- Roquefort shows the lowest values of resistance to penetration, mainly due to its crumbly structure.
3.3. Results Obtained through Statistical Analysis
3.4. Penetration Force
3.5. Firmness Index
3.6. Analysis of Moisture Content
3.7. Tangential Stress
4. Discussion
- Consistency: As mold cheese matures during storage, enzymatic activity can lead to a creamier texture or, conversely, a more crumbly one. Initially, the cheese may be firmer, but it becomes softer and more buttery over time.
- Shear Stresses: These measure the cheese’s resistance to cutting. During maturation, protein bonds break down, which can reduce shear resistance, making the cheese easier to cut. However, variations in storage conditions, such as humidity and temperature, can influence these properties.
- Structural Changes: Long-term storage can lead to the development of additional mold characteristics, altering the texture profile and even the taste of the cheese.
- Aroma: Maturation also affects the cheese’s aroma profile. Volatile compounds produced during maturation can intensify cheese’s aroma, indirectly influencing the perceived texture during consumption.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Karoui, R.; De Baerdemaeker, J. A review of the analytical methods coupled with chemometric tools for the determination of the quality and identity of dairy products. Food chemistry 2007, 102, 621–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guinee, T.P.; O’callaghan, D.J. Control and prediction of quality characteristics in the manufacture and ripening of cheese. In Technology of cheesemaking, 2nd Edition. 2010; 8904, 260–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salles, C.; Chagnon, M.C.; Feron, G.; Guichard, E.; Laboure, H.; Morzel, M.; Yven, C. In-mouth mechanisms leading to flavor release and perception. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 2011, 51, 67–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dicolla, C.B. Characterization of heat resistant milk chocolates. Master Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Bonilla-Chaves, E.F.; Palos-Sánchez, P.R. Exploring the evolution of human resource analytics: a bibliometric study. Behavioral Sciences 2023, 13, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweileh, W.M. Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on climate change and human health with an emphasis on infectious diseases. Global Health 2020, 16, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harper, R.; Baron, M. The application of factor analysis to tests on cheese. British Journal of Applied Physics 1956, 2, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potter, N.N. Chapter Quality factors and how they are measured, In book Food Science Ed. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013, 113-139.
- Prentice, J.H.; Langley, K.R.; Marshall, R.J. Cheese rheology. In In: Fox, P.F. (eds) Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology 1993, Spinger Boston, MA, USA. [CrossRef]
- Joshi, N.S.; Jhala, R.P.; Muthukumarappan, K.; Acharya, M.R.; Mistry, V.V. Textural and Rheological Properties of Processed Cheese. International Journal of Food Properties 2004, 7, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michelson, P. Cheese: exploring taste and tradition, Publisher Gibbs Smith 2010.
- Korolczuk, J.; Roignant, M.; Maubois, J.L. Computer data acquisition of sinusoid ally varying stress and strain. Journal of texture studies 2007, 16, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awad, R.A.; Salama, W.M.; Ragb, W.A. Enhancing yield and acceptability of Kareish cheese made of Reformulated milk. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 2015, 5, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, P.; Dessev, T.T.; Munro, P.A.; Wiles, P.G.; Gillies, G.; Golding, M.; James, B.; Janssen, P. Measurement techniques for steady shear viscosity of Mozzarella-type cheeses at high shear rates and high temperature. International Dairy Journal 2015, 47, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ipate, G.; Biris, S.S.; Voicu, G.; Vladut, V.; Zabava, B.; Udroiu, N.A.; Pihurov, M. Numerical simulation and experimental evaluation of the rheological behaviour of cheese. Research people and actual tasks on multidisciplinary sciences 2019, Lozenec, Bulgaria.
- Hartmann, K.; Licitra, G.; Eugster-Meier, E.; Fröhlich-Wyder, M.T.; Jakob, E.; Wechsler, D.; Ardo, Y. Hard cheeses. In Global Cheesemaking Technology: Cheese Quality and Characteristics,. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2017, 204-246. [CrossRef]
- Crespo, A.; Martín, A.; Ruiz-Moyano, S.; Benito, M.J.; Rufo, M.; Paniagua, J.M.; Jiménez, A. Application of ultrasound for quality control of Torta del Casar cheese ripening. Journal of Dairy Science 2020, 103, 8808–8821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunasekaran, S.; Ak, M.M. Cheese rheology and texture. In Handbook of Cheese Chemistry; 2023. [CrossRef]
- Korolczuk, J.; Mahaut, M. Studies on acid cheese texture by a computerized, constant speed, cone penetrometer. Le Lait 1988, 68, 349–361. https://hal.science/hal-00929137 hal-0092913.
- Guinee, T.P.; O’callaghan, D.J. Control and prediction of quality characteristics in the manufacture and ripening of cheese, In bookTechnology of cheesemaking 2000, 8904, 260. [CrossRef]
- Olson, N.F.; Vakaleris, D.G.; Price, W.V.; Knight, S.G. Acidity and age of natural cheese as factors affecting the body of pasteurized process cheese spread. Journal of Dairy Science 1958, 41, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koca, N.; Öztürk, M.U. Application of batch system ultraviolet light on the surface of kashar cheese, a kind of pasta-filata cheese: effects on mould inactivation, lipid oxidation, colour, hardness and sensory properties. Journal of Dairy Research 2020, 87, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falcone, P.M.; Baiano, A.; Conte, A.; Mancini, L.; Tromba, G.; Zanini, F.; Del Nobile, M.A. Imaging techniques for the study of food microstructure: a review. Advances in food and nutrition research 2006, 51, 205–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lashkari, H.; Khosrowshahi asl, A.; Madadlou, A.; Alizadeh, M. Chemical composition and rheology of low-fat Iranian white cheese incorporated with guar gum and gum arabic as fat replacers. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2014, 51, 2584–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ipate, G.; Voicu, G.; Dinu, I. Research on the use of drones in precision agriculture. University Politehnica of Bucharest Bulletin Series 2015, 77, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Pompei, C.; Lucisano, M.; Zanoni, B.; Casiraghi, E. Evaluation of spreadability of food products by penetration tests and panel scores. Journal of Food Science 1988, 53, 592–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayakawa, M.; Deman, J.M. Interpretation of cone penetrometer consistency measurements of fats. Journal of Texture Studies 1982, 13, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lis, A.; Staniewski, B.; Ziajka, J. A comparison of butter texture measurements with the AP 4/2 penetrometer and TA. XT. Plus texture analyzer. International Journal of Food Properties 2021, 24, 1744–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gageanu, I.; Cujbescu, D.; Persu, C.; Tudor, P.; Cardei, P.; Matache, M.; Ungureanu, N. Influence of input and control parameters on the process of pelleting powdered biomass. Energies 2021, 14, 4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moiceanu, G.; Voicu, G.; Paraschiv, G.; Ipate, G. Aspects regarding miscanthus cutting process FEM simulation and some experimental data, In Engineering for Rural Development. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Latvia) 2019, 18, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. [CrossRef]
- Szczesniak, A.S. Instrumental methods of texture measurements, In Texture Measurements of Foods: Psychophysical Fundamentals: Sensory, Mechanical, and Chemical Procedures, and their Interrelationships, 1st ed. 1973, 71-108, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
- Geng, X.; Ipsen, R.; Liot, F. Rheological properties of cold and hot filled model cream cheese. Ann. Trans. Nordic Rheol. Soc. 2008, 16, 217–223. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.; Han, Q.; Chu, F. Review of electromagnetic vibration in electrical machines. Energies 2018, 11, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilie, F.; Saracin, I.A.; Voicu, G. Study of Wear Phenomenon of a Dental Milling Cutter by Statistical–Mathematical Modeling Based on the Experimental Results. Materials 2022, 15, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vu, N.D.; Tran, N.T.Y.; Le, T.D.; Phan, N.T.M.; Doan, P.L.A.; Huynh, L.B.; Dao, P.T. Kinetic model of moisture loss and polyphenol degradation during heat pump drying of soursop fruit (Annona muricata L.). Processes 2022, 10, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, A.; Martynenko, A. The effect of material thickness, load density, external airflow, and relative humidity on the drying efficiency and quality of EHD-dried apples. Foods, 2022; 11, 2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, A.; Zheng, X.; Xiao, H.; Yao, X.; Liu, D.; Li, X.; Li, Y. Short-and medium-wave infrared drying of cantaloupe (Cucumis melon L.) slices: Drying kinetics and process parameter optimization. Processes 2022, 10, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.L.; Chen, Y.; Xu, W.; Xu, M.T.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X.C.; Xiong, Y.K. Assessment of drying kinetics, textural and aroma attributes of Mentha haplocalyx leaves during the hot air thin-layer drying process. Foods 2022, 11, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahaut, M.; Korolczuk, J.; Pannetier, R.; Maubois, J.L. Eléments de fabrication de fromage de type pâte molle de lait de chèvre à caractère lactique par ultrafiltration de lait acidifié et coagulé. Techinique Latère & Marketing. Julho-agosto 1986, 1011, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
- Luyten, H. The rheological and fracture properties of Gouda cheese, Doctoral Thesis 1988, Wageningen University and Research.
- Mackey, K.L.; Ofoli, R.Y.; Morgan, R.G.; Steffe, J.F. Rheological modeling of potato flour during extrusion cooking. Journal of food process engineering 1990, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatzikiriakos, S.G. Wall slip of molten polymers. Progress in Polymer Science 2012, 37, 624–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazaroiu, G.; Mihaescu, L.; Grigoriu, R.M.; Negreanu, G.P.; Stoica, D. Possibilities of Climate Control of Poultry Complexes through Co-Combustion of Poultry Waste–Solid Biomass for Agriculture in Romania. Agriculture 2024, 14, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Jia, R.; Hui, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, B. Utilization of two plant polysaccharides to improve fresh goat milk cheese, Texture, rheological properties, and microstructure characterization. Journal of Dairy Science 2023, 106, 3900–3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, M.; Lu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Mata, A.; Fang, Y. Natural polymer-sourced interpenetrating network hydrogels: Fabrication, properties, mechanism and food applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2021, 116, 342–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahimi, J.; Khosrowshahi, A.; Moradi, M.M.; Mohamadi, H.; Abbasi, H.; Madadlou, A. Texture and chemistry of Iranian white cheese as influenced by brine treatments. Journal of Food Processing & Technology 2013, 4, 1000219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leach, M.R.; Farkas, B.E.; Daubert, C.R. Rheological Characterization of Process Cheese Using Tube Viscometry. International Journal of Food Properties 2003, 6, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farahani, G.; Ezzatpanah, H.; Abbasi, S. Characterization of Siahmazgi cheese, an Iranian ewe’s milk variety: Assessment of physico-chemical, textural and rheological specifications during ripening. LWT-Food science and Technology 2014, 58, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vukić, D.V.; Vukić, V.R.; Milanović, S.D.; Ilicic, M.D.; Kanuric, K.G. Modeling of rheological characteristics of the fermented dairy products obtained by novel and traditional starter cultures. J Food Sci Technol. 2018, 55, 2180–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunick, M.H. Chapter: Cheese Rheology and Texture, In book: Handbook of Cheese Chemistry, 1st Edition, Series: Food Chemistry, Function and Analysis, 2023, 202–222. [CrossRef]


















| Characteristic name | Values |
|---|---|
| Nominal Force (Fnom) | 1 kN |
| Maximum Operating Force (Fom) | ≤ 125% |
| Output Signal Options | 0...10 V/4...20 mA |
| Nominal Supply Voltage | 24 V |
| Supply Voltage Range | 12-36 V |
| Relative Linearity Error | ≤ 0.5% |
| Hysteresis | ≤ 0.05% |
| Relative Repeatability Error | ≤ 0.05% Fnom |
| Characteristic | Camembert | Brie | Dorblue | Roquefort |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample mass (g) | 120 | 125 | 100 | 100 |
| Height (mm) | 32.5 | 32.5 | 25 | 25 |
| Nutritional value (kcal per 100g) | 216 | 334 | 413 | 346 |
| pH | 6.7 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 6.0 |
| Milk fats (g per 100g) | 13.5 | 17 | 29 | 29.8 |
| Total proteins (g per 100g) | 23.5 | 20 | 19 | 21.1 |
| Dry matter (%) | 61.7 | 64.65 | 64.23 | 56.16 |
| Sodium (g per 100g) | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 3.5 |
| Analysis of variance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Sum Sq | d.f. | Mean Sq. | F | Prob>F |
| GeometryCONE | 1666.7 | 1 | 1666.7 | 15752.15 | 0 |
| Speed | 0.45 | 2 | 0.23 | 2.13 | 0.1188 |
| Error | 464.6 | 4391 | 0.11 | ||
| Total | 2161.24 | 4394 | |||
| Analysis of variance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Sum Sq | d.f. | Mean Sq. | F | Prob>F |
| GeometryCONE | 1632.95 | 1 | 1632.95 | 15446.74 | 0 |
| Product | 1.04 | 3 | 0.35 | 3.28 | 0.0201 |
| Speed | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.5763 |
| Error | 434.98 | 4389 | 0.11 | ||
| Total | 2161.24 | 4394 | |||
| Cheese | Cone | Const. cone | Speed | FI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAMEMBERT | con_9_gr | 4.020 | v12mm_min | 0.0612 |
| v30mm_min | 0.069 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.0738 | |||
| con_19_gr | 1.850 | v12mm_min | 0.121472 | |
| v30mm_min | 0.145759 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.154103 | |||
| con_90_gr | 0.159 | v12mm_min | 0.685781 | |
| v30mm_min | 0.508961 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.548529 | |||
| BRIE | con_9_gr | 4.020 | v12mm_min | 0.056211 |
| v30mm_min | 0.06026 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.054781 | |||
| con_19_gr | 1.850 | v12mm_min | 0.119805 | |
| v30mm_min | 0.107896 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.110844 | |||
| con_90_gr | 0.159 | v12mm_min | 0.531142 | |
| v30mm_min | 0.36775 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.35084 | |||
| DORBLUE | con_9_gr | 4.020 | v12mm_min | 0.045254 |
| v30mm_min | 0.069056 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.073836 | |||
| con_19_gr | 1.850 | v12mm_min | 0.121472 | |
| v30mm_min | 0.145759 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.14529 | |||
| con_90_gr | 0.159 | v12mm_min | 0.685781 | |
| v30mm_min | 0.508961 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.548529 | |||
| ROQUEFORT | con_9_gr | 4.020 | v12mm_min | 0.03406 |
| v30mm_min | 0.040252 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.073836 | |||
| con_19_gr | 1.850 | v12mm_min | 0.121472 | |
| v30mm_min | 0.056211 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.14529 | |||
| con_90_gr | 0.159 | v12mm_min | 0.355603 | |
| v30mm_min | 0.265095 | |||
| v60mm_min | 0.548529 |
| Apparent viscosity (shear stress)—ηa = Kf · τcn | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheese | Cone | Speed | Kf | n | R2 |
| CAMEMBERT | con_9_gr | v12mm_min | 3.57 | 1.75 | 0.99 |
| v30mm_min | 7.7 | 1.745 | 0.998 | ||
| v60mm_min | 28.26 | 1.838 | 0.987 | ||
| con_19_gr | v12mm_min | 1.829 | 1.764 | 0.99 | |
| v30mm_min | 6.007 | 1.788 | 0.99 | ||
| v60mm_min | 20.016 | 1.867 | 0.99 | ||
| con_90_gr | v12mm_min | 109.49 | 2.108 | 0.994 | |
| v30mm_min | 8.294 | 1.777 | 0.997 | ||
| v60mm_min | 4.148 | 1.485 | 0.999 | ||
| BRIE | con_9_gr | v12mm_min | 3.35 | 1.688 | 0.99 |
| v30mm_min | 6.647 | 1.701 | 0.997 | ||
| v60mm_min | 27.68 | 1.818 | 0.987 | ||
| con_19_gr | v12mm_min | 2.057 | 1.684 | 0.999 | |
| v30mm_min | 5.044 | 1.734 | 0.998 | ||
| v60mm_min | 33.672 | 2.049 | 0.994 | ||
| con_90_gr | v12mm_min | 109.49 | 2.018 | 0.994 | |
| v30mm_min | 13.289 | 1.847 | 0.997 | ||
| v60mm_min | 7.369 | 1.628 | 0.999 | ||
| Cheese | Cone | Speed | K | n | R^2 |
| DORBLUE | con_9_gr | v12mm_min | 61.39 | 1.91 | 0.981 |
| v30mm_min | 13.176 | 1.859 | 0.99 | ||
| v60mm_min | 4.64 | 1.782 | 0.98 | ||
| con_19_gr | v12mm_min | 48.267 | 2.084 | 0.994 | |
| v30mm_min | 10.022 | 1.923 | 0.972 | ||
| v60mm_min | 4.032 | 2.074 | 0.998 | ||
| con_90_gr | v12mm_min | 133.7 | 2.157 | 0.993 | |
| v30mm_min | 85.859 | 2.17 | 0.993 | ||
| v60mm_min | 5.848 | 1.636 | 0.999 | ||
| ROQUEFORT | con_9_gr | v12mm_min | 30.408 | 1.731 | 0.988 |
| v30mm_min | 7.707 | 1.735 | 0.998 | ||
| v60mm_min | 3.57 | 1.753 | 0.99 | ||
| con_19_gr | v12mm_min | 53.543 | 2.009 | 0.995 | |
| v30mm_min | 18.144 | 1.849 | 0.998 | ||
| v60mm_min | 7.883 | 1.773 | 0.997 | ||
| con_90_gr | v12mm_min | 32.458 | 1.759 | 0.998 | |
| v30mm_min | 22.891 | 1.819 | 0.998 | ||
| v60mm_min | 7.665 | 1.609 | 0.993 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).