1. Introduction
The advent of additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized various industries by introducing innovative approaches to design and production. Traditionally, supply chain management (SCM) has relied on well-established processes involving mass production, inventory management, and extensive logistics networks. However, the emergence of AM technologies, which build objects layer by layer from digital models, is reshaping these traditional paradigms.
Additive manufacturing offers several advantages that directly impact SCM, including the capability for on-demand production, reduced need for extensive inventory, and enhanced customization. Unlike conventional manufacturing processes that often require large production runs and significant upfront investment in tooling and molds, AM allows for the production of parts and products directly from digital designs. This shift not only alters the dynamics of production but also influences how businesses manage their supply chains.
The integration of AM into SCM practices presents both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, it promises greater flexibility, reduced lead times, and cost savings through localized manufacturing. On the other hand, it necessitates changes in supply chain strategies, including adjustments to inventory management practices, procurement processes, and distribution networks.
This introduction aims to set the stage for a detailed exploration of how AM affects various components of SCM. It will outline the key aspects of AM technology, discuss its implications for traditional supply chain practices, and highlight the potential benefits and challenges that organizations may encounter as they adapt to these new manufacturing capabilities. Understanding these impacts is crucial for businesses seeking to leverage AM for competitive advantage and efficiency in their supply chains.
2. Fundamentals of Additive Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing (AM) represents a group of technologies that create objects by adding material layer by layer, directly from digital models. This section explores the core principles and techniques of AM, providing a foundation for understanding its impact on supply chain management.
Additive manufacturing, often referred to as 3D printing, involves the sequential addition of material to build complex geometries and structures from a digital file. Unlike subtractive manufacturing methods, which cut away material from a larger block, AM constructs objects by depositing material in precise patterns. This approach allows for greater design flexibility and the creation of intricate parts with minimal waste.
- 2.
Types of Additive Manufacturing Technologies
Several key AM technologies are prevalent in industry:
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): This widely used method involves extruding thermoplastic filaments through a heated nozzle, which deposits the material layer by layer. It is commonly used for prototyping and low-volume production.
Stereolithography (SLA): SLA employs a laser to cure liquid resin into solid layers, creating highly detailed and accurate parts. This technology is often used for applications requiring high precision and smooth surface finishes.
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS): SLS uses a laser to fuse powdered materials, such as nylon or metal, into solid structures. This technique is suitable for producing functional parts and complex geometries.
Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS): Similar to SLS, DMLS focuses on metal powders, enabling the production of durable metal components used in aerospace, automotive, and other industries.
Digital Light Processing (DLP): DLP utilizes a digital light projector to cure resin in a similar manner to SLA but can be faster due to its use of a light projector instead of a laser.
- 3.
Key Advantages of Additive Manufacturing
Customization: AM enables the production of customized and personalized parts without the need for specialized tooling or molds. This is particularly valuable in industries such as healthcare, where custom prosthetics and implants are required.
Complex Geometries: The layer-by-layer approach allows for the creation of complex and intricate geometries that are difficult or impossible to achieve with traditional manufacturing methods.
Reduced Waste: AM generates less material waste compared to subtractive processes, as material is only used where needed. This contributes to more sustainable manufacturing practices.
Rapid Prototyping: AM accelerates the design and development process by allowing for quick iteration and modification of prototypes, reducing time-to-market for new products.
- 4.
Applications and Industry Adoption
Additive manufacturing is increasingly being adopted across various sectors, including aerospace, automotive, medical, and consumer goods. Its ability to produce complex parts, reduce lead times, and enable localized manufacturing is driving its integration into traditional manufacturing and supply chain processes.
Understanding the fundamentals of additive manufacturing provides insight into how these technologies can disrupt and enhance supply chain management practices, leading to more efficient and responsive manufacturing systems.
3. Overview of Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain Management (SCM) encompasses the oversight and coordination of activities involved in the production and delivery of products, from raw materials to the end consumer. It involves the integration of key functions such as procurement, production, logistics, and distribution to optimize efficiency and meet customer demands. This section provides a comprehensive overview of SCM, its components, and its strategic importance.
Supply Chain Management is defined as the systematic management of the flow of goods, information, and finances across the entire supply chain network. The primary objectives of SCM are to ensure that products are delivered to customers in a timely, cost-effective, and high-quality manner. Key goals include:
Cost Reduction: Minimizing costs associated with production, transportation, and inventory management.
Customer Satisfaction: Ensuring that products meet customer expectations in terms of quality, availability, and delivery time.
Efficiency and Effectiveness: Streamlining processes to enhance overall supply chain performance and responsiveness.
Risk Management: Identifying and mitigating potential risks and disruptions within the supply chain.
- 2.
Key Components of Supply Chain Management
Procurement: Involves the sourcing and acquisition of raw materials, components, and services needed for production. Effective procurement strategies focus on selecting suppliers, negotiating contracts, and managing supplier relationships.
Production: Encompasses the transformation of raw materials into finished products. This includes manufacturing processes, quality control, and capacity planning. Production strategies aim to optimize efficiency, minimize waste, and ensure product consistency.
Logistics: Refers to the management of the movement and storage of goods throughout the supply chain. This includes transportation, warehousing, and distribution. Logistics aims to ensure timely and cost-effective delivery of products to customers.
Inventory Management: Involves the planning and control of inventory levels to balance supply and demand. Effective inventory management minimizes excess stock, reduces carrying costs, and prevents stockouts.
Demand Planning: The process of forecasting future customer demand to align production and inventory levels accordingly. Accurate demand planning helps in optimizing resource allocation and minimizing stock imbalances.
Information Flow: The exchange of data and information between supply chain partners to facilitate decision-making and coordination. This includes order processing, shipment tracking, and performance monitoring.
- 3.
Supply Chain Strategies
Just-in-Time (JIT): A strategy aimed at reducing inventory levels by synchronizing production and delivery schedules with actual demand. JIT emphasizes lean operations and minimizing holding costs.
Lean Supply Chain: Focuses on eliminating waste and improving process efficiency across the supply chain. Lean principles aim to streamline operations, reduce lead times, and enhance overall value.
Agile Supply Chain: Designed to be flexible and responsive to changes in demand and market conditions. Agile supply chains prioritize adaptability and quick response times.
Sustainable Supply Chain: Incorporates environmental and social considerations into supply chain practices. Sustainable supply chains aim to minimize environmental impact and promote ethical practices.
- 4.
Challenges in Supply Chain Management
Complexity: Managing a global network of suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors can be complex and challenging.
Risk and Disruption: Supply chains are vulnerable to disruptions from natural disasters, geopolitical issues, and other unforeseen events.
Demand Variability: Fluctuations in customer demand can lead to inventory imbalances and operational inefficiencies.
Technology Integration: Implementing and integrating advanced technologies can be costly and require significant change management efforts.
- 5.
The Strategic Role of Supply Chain Management
SCM plays a critical role in achieving competitive advantage by enhancing operational efficiency, reducing costs, and improving customer satisfaction. Organizations with effective SCM practices are better positioned to respond to market changes, innovate, and deliver value to customers.
Understanding the fundamentals of SCM provides a foundation for analyzing how additive manufacturing technologies can impact and transform supply chain practices, leading to more agile and efficient supply chains.
4. Impact of Additive Manufacturing on Supply Chain Management
Additive Manufacturing (AM) introduces significant changes to traditional supply chain management (SCM) practices. By altering the way products are designed, produced, and delivered, AM impacts various aspects of the supply chain. This section explores the key effects of AM on SCM, highlighting both the opportunities and challenges it presents.
AM enables on-demand production, allowing companies to manufacture products as needed rather than maintaining large inventories. This shift has several implications:
Reduced Inventory Costs: With AM, companies can reduce or eliminate the need for holding extensive inventories. This reduces storage costs and minimizes the risk of obsolescence for unsold products.
Lower Lead Times: On-demand production shortens lead times, as products can be produced quickly in response to specific orders. This agility helps businesses respond faster to market changes and customer demands.
Just-in-Time Production: AM supports just-in-time (JIT) production models by allowing for precise and timely manufacturing of parts, thereby aligning production closely with actual demand.
- 2.
Customization and Product Differentiation
AM's ability to produce customized and complex designs directly from digital files enables greater product differentiation:
Personalization: AM allows for the creation of customized products tailored to individual customer specifications, enhancing customer satisfaction and offering unique value propositions.
Complex Geometries: The technology enables the production of intricate and complex designs that would be difficult or impossible to achieve with traditional manufacturing methods, leading to innovative product designs.
- 3.
Supply Chain Flexibility and Resilience
AM impacts supply chain flexibility and resilience in several ways:
Localized Production: AM enables localized manufacturing, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and lowering associated costs and risks. Local production can also help mitigate disruptions caused by global supply chain issues.
Decentralized Manufacturing: By distributing production capabilities closer to end-users, AM supports decentralized manufacturing strategies, enhancing supply chain responsiveness and reducing dependency on centralized facilities.
Rapid Prototyping and Iteration: AM facilitates rapid prototyping, allowing companies to quickly test and iterate product designs. This agility can lead to faster innovation and reduced time-to-market.
- 4.
Challenges and Considerations
While AM offers numerous benefits, it also presents challenges that organizations must address:
Technology Integration: Integrating AM technology into existing manufacturing processes and supply chains can be complex and require significant investment in new equipment, software, and training.
Quality Control: Ensuring consistent quality and reliability in AM-produced parts can be challenging, especially for critical applications. Organizations must implement robust quality control measures to maintain product standards.
Scalability: While AM is effective for low-volume and customized production, scaling up to high-volume manufacturing may be limited by current AM technologies and materials.
- 5.
Strategic Implications for Supply Chain Management
The integration of AM into SCM requires strategic adjustments to fully leverage its benefits:
Supply Chain Design: Companies may need to redesign their supply chains to incorporate AM capabilities, including changes in procurement, production planning, and logistics.
Supplier Relationships: The role of suppliers may shift as AM reduces reliance on traditional manufacturing processes. Organizations may need to develop new partnerships and collaborate with AM technology providers.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis is essential to evaluate the financial implications of adopting AM, including potential savings from reduced inventory and production costs versus the investment in new technology.
- 6.
Case Studies and Industry Examples
Examining real-world examples of AM implementation can provide valuable insights into its impact on SCM. Case studies from industries such as aerospace, automotive, and healthcare demonstrate how AM has been used to enhance supply chain efficiency, reduce costs, and drive innovation.
5. Case Studies and Real-World Examples
To illustrate the impact of additive manufacturing (AM) on supply chain management (SCM), this section examines several case studies and real-world examples across various industries. These examples highlight how companies have leveraged AM to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and drive innovation within their supply chains.
Background: Boeing, a leading aerospace manufacturer, has incorporated AM into its production processes to improve efficiency and reduce weight in its aircraft components.
Implementation:
Parts Production: Boeing has used AM to produce complex, lightweight components for its aircraft, such as brackets and housings, which are challenging to manufacture using traditional methods.
Supply Chain Integration: By adopting AM, Boeing has been able to reduce the lead times for producing and delivering these components, leading to faster assembly and reduced overall production time.
Outcomes:
Weight Reduction: The use of AM has led to a significant reduction in the weight of aircraft parts, contributing to fuel savings and improved performance.
Cost Savings: Boeing has experienced cost savings through reduced material waste and shorter production cycles.
- 2.
Automotive Industry: Ford Motor Company
Background: Ford Motor Company has utilized AM to advance its manufacturing processes and enhance vehicle customization.
Implementation:
Prototyping and Production: Ford employs AM for rapid prototyping of vehicle parts and tools, allowing for faster design iterations and validation. Additionally, AM is used to produce customized parts for special editions of vehicles.
Spare Parts: Ford has explored the use of AM for on-demand production of spare parts, reducing inventory and storage costs.
Outcomes:
Faster Development: The use of AM for prototyping has accelerated the development of new vehicle models and features.
Reduced Inventory Costs: On-demand production of spare parts has minimized inventory holding costs and improved the efficiency of parts distribution.
- 3.
Healthcare Industry: Siemens Healthineers
Background: Siemens Healthineers, a major player in medical technology, has integrated AM into the production of medical devices and customized implants.
Implementation:
Customized Implants: Siemens Healthineers uses AM to create patient-specific implants and prosthetics based on individual anatomical data, improving the fit and functionality of medical devices.
Rapid Prototyping: AM is used for rapid prototyping of medical devices and equipment, allowing for quicker development and testing.
Outcomes:
Enhanced Patient Outcomes: Customized implants and prosthetics have led to better clinical outcomes and improved patient comfort.
Accelerated Innovation: The ability to quickly prototype and test new medical devices has accelerated innovation and reduced time-to-market.
- 4.
Consumer Goods Industry: Adidas
Background: Adidas has adopted AM technology to innovate its manufacturing processes for athletic footwear.
Implementation:
3D Printed Soles: Adidas has developed 3D-printed soles using AM technology, which allows for greater customization and design flexibility in its footwear products.
Localized Production: Adidas has explored localized production using AM to produce footwear closer to the point of sale, reducing lead times and shipping costs.
Outcomes:
Product Customization: The use of AM has enabled Adidas to offer customized footwear designs tailored to individual preferences and needs.
Reduced Environmental Impact: Localized production has helped reduce the carbon footprint associated with transportation and shipping.
- 5.
Defense Industry: Lockheed Martin
Background: Lockheed Martin, a defense contractor, has implemented AM to enhance the manufacturing of aerospace and defense components.
Implementation:
Component Production: Lockheed Martin uses AM to produce complex aerospace components and parts for military aircraft and spacecraft.
On-Demand Manufacturing: AM enables the on-demand production of spare parts and components, supporting maintenance and repair operations.
Outcomes:
Improved Supply Chain Agility: AM has enhanced Lockheed Martin’s ability to respond to changing requirements and reduce lead times for critical components.
Cost Efficiency: The adoption of AM has resulted in cost savings through reduced material waste and shorter production cycles.
6. Challenges and Considerations
While additive manufacturing (AM) offers numerous advantages for supply chain management (SCM), its adoption comes with several challenges and considerations that organizations must address. This section outlines the key challenges associated with integrating AM into supply chains and provides insights into how these challenges can be managed.
Technology Integration: Integrating AM technology into existing manufacturing processes and supply chains can be complex. Organizations must invest in new equipment, software, and training, which can be costly and time-consuming.
Material Limitations: AM technologies are currently limited by the range of materials available and their properties. Certain materials used in traditional manufacturing may not be compatible with AM, potentially limiting its application in some industries.
Quality Control: Ensuring consistent quality and reliability of AM-produced parts can be challenging. Variability in print conditions, material properties, and post-processing can affect the final product’s performance and reliability.
- 2.
Cost Considerations
Initial Investment: The upfront costs associated with purchasing AM equipment and software can be significant. This investment may be a barrier for some organizations, particularly smaller businesses.
Cost per Unit: While AM can reduce costs associated with inventory and tooling, the cost per unit for certain products may be higher compared to traditional mass production methods, especially for high-volume production.
- 3.
Scalability and Production Volume
Low vs. High Volume Production: AM is well-suited for low-volume and customized production but may face limitations in scaling up to high-volume manufacturing. The speed of AM processes may not always match the efficiency of traditional high-volume manufacturing techniques.
Production Speed: Depending on the technology and material used, AM processes can be slower compared to traditional manufacturing methods, which may impact production timelines for large orders.
- 4.
Supply Chain Integration and Logistics
Redesigning Supply Chains: Integrating AM into existing supply chains may require significant changes in procurement, production planning, and logistics. Organizations must evaluate how AM fits into their overall supply chain strategy and make necessary adjustments.
Logistics and Distribution: While AM can reduce the need for long-distance transportation, it also requires a reevaluation of logistics and distribution strategies, especially if localized production facilities are established.
- 5.
Intellectual Property and Design Security
IP Protection: The digital nature of AM raises concerns about intellectual property (IP) protection. Digital files used in AM can be easily shared or copied, potentially leading to IP theft or counterfeiting.
Design Security: Protecting the security of digital design files and ensuring that only authorized users have access to them is crucial to prevent unauthorized duplication and ensure product integrity.
- 6.
Workforce and Skills Development
Skill Requirements: AM technology requires specialized knowledge and skills, which may necessitate additional training for the workforce. Organizations must invest in skill development to effectively utilize AM technologies.
Change Management: Adopting AM may require a cultural shift within organizations, as employees adapt to new processes and technologies. Effective change management strategies are essential to facilitate this transition.
- 7.
Environmental and Sustainability Considerations
Material Waste: While AM generally reduces material waste compared to subtractive manufacturing, the environmental impact of certain materials and processes must be considered. Sustainable practices should be adopted to minimize the ecological footprint.
Energy Consumption: The energy consumption of AM processes can be higher than traditional manufacturing methods, depending on the technology and materials used. Organizations should evaluate the energy efficiency of AM technologies and explore ways to reduce their environmental impact.
Conclusion
Addressing the challenges and considerations associated with additive manufacturing is essential for organizations looking to integrate AM into their supply chains. By understanding these challenges and developing strategies to manage them, businesses can better leverage the benefits of AM and enhance their supply chain performance.
Let me know if you’d like to add any specific details or address other aspects related to challenges and considerations!
7. Future Trends and Developments
As additive manufacturing (AM) continues to evolve, it is poised to bring about significant changes in supply chain management (SCM) and broader industrial practices. This section explores emerging trends and future developments in AM, highlighting their potential impact on the future of SCM and manufacturing.
New Materials: Ongoing research and development are expanding the range of materials available for AM. Future trends include the development of high-performance materials such as advanced polymers, metals, and composite materials that can meet the demands of various industries.
Multi-Material Printing: The ability to print with multiple materials simultaneously is an emerging trend that enables the creation of complex and functional parts with varying properties. This advancement will enhance the versatility and applications of AM.
Improved Print Speed and Resolution: Advances in AM technologies are expected to improve print speed and resolution, making AM more viable for high-volume production and applications requiring fine detail and precision.
- 2.
Integration with Digital Technologies
Industry 4.0: The integration of AM with Industry 4.0 technologies, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and big data analytics, will enable smarter and more connected manufacturing processes. Real-time data and predictive analytics can optimize AM processes and enhance decision-making.
Digital Twins: The use of digital twins—virtual replicas of physical assets—will allow for real-time monitoring and optimization of AM processes. Digital twins can simulate and analyze production scenarios, improving efficiency and reducing downtime.
- 3.
Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Practices
Circular Economy: AM is expected to play a key role in the circular economy by enabling the recycling and repurposing of materials. Advances in material recovery and recycling technologies will support sustainable manufacturing practices.
Energy Efficiency: Future developments in AM technologies will focus on reducing energy consumption and improving the environmental impact of manufacturing processes. Innovations in energy-efficient printing techniques and renewable energy integration will contribute to more sustainable practices.
- 4.
Expanding Applications and Industries
Healthcare Innovations: The application of AM in healthcare will continue to grow, with advancements in bioprinting and personalized medicine. Future developments may include 3D-printed organs and tissues, enhancing medical treatments and patient outcomes.
Construction and Architecture: AM is set to transform the construction and architecture industries with the development of 3D-printed buildings and structures. This technology promises to reduce construction costs, improve design flexibility, and accelerate building processes.
- 5.
Enhanced Supply Chain Integration
Decentralized Manufacturing: The trend towards decentralized manufacturing will be supported by AM, allowing for localized production closer to end-users. This shift will enhance supply chain resilience and reduce dependency on centralized manufacturing hubs.
Customization and Personalization: The demand for customized and personalized products will drive further adoption of AM in consumer goods and other industries. Enhanced AM capabilities will enable mass customization and tailored solutions for individual preferences.
- 6.
Collaboration and Industry Standards
Standardization: As AM technologies advance, the development of industry standards and best practices will be crucial for ensuring quality, interoperability, and safety. Collaborative efforts among industry stakeholders will drive the establishment of these standards.
Collaborative Innovation: Partnerships between technology providers, manufacturers, and research institutions will accelerate innovation in AM. Collaborative initiatives will focus on addressing technical challenges, exploring new applications, and advancing the state of the art in AM.
- 7.
Regulatory and Ethical Considerations
Regulation and Compliance: The growth of AM will necessitate updates to regulatory frameworks and compliance standards to address safety, quality, and intellectual property issues. Ensuring that AM practices meet regulatory requirements will be essential for widespread adoption.
Ethical Implications: The ethical implications of AM, including concerns about IP protection, digital rights, and potential misuse of technology, will need to be addressed. Developing ethical guidelines and policies will be important for responsible AM practices.
8. Conclusions
Additive manufacturing (AM) represents a transformative shift in manufacturing and supply chain management (SCM), offering a range of benefits and opportunities that redefine traditional practices. As explored in this paper, AM’s impact on SCM is profound, influencing everything from production processes and inventory management to customization and supply chain flexibility.
Summary of Key Findings:
Efficiency and Cost Reduction: AM enables on-demand production and minimizes inventory requirements, leading to significant cost savings and enhanced efficiency. By reducing the need for large inventories and tooling, AM lowers overhead costs and streamlines manufacturing processes.
Customization and Innovation: The technology's ability to produce complex and customized parts supports greater product differentiation and innovation. Industries such as healthcare, aerospace, and consumer goods are leveraging AM to create tailored solutions and push the boundaries of design.
Supply Chain Flexibility: AM enhances supply chain resilience by facilitating localized and decentralized production. This flexibility allows businesses to respond more rapidly to market demands and disruptions, improving overall supply chain agility.
Challenges and Considerations: Despite its advantages, AM presents challenges including technology integration, material limitations, and quality control. Addressing these challenges requires careful planning and investment in new technologies and skill development.
Future Outlook:
Looking ahead, AM is expected to continue evolving with advances in materials, technologies, and digital integration. Trends such as improved print speeds, sustainable practices, and expanded applications will further enhance the capabilities and impact of AM. The integration of AM with Industry 4.0 technologies and the development of industry standards will play a crucial role in shaping the future landscape of manufacturing and SCM.
Strategic Implications:
For organizations considering the adoption of AM, strategic planning is essential. Companies must evaluate how AM fits into their supply chain strategies, assess the associated costs and benefits, and develop strategies to overcome implementation challenges. Embracing AM offers the potential for significant competitive advantage, but it requires a thoughtful approach to fully realize its benefits.
Final Thoughts:
Additive manufacturing is more than just a technological advancement; it represents a fundamental shift in how products are designed, produced, and delivered. As the technology continues to advance and integrate into supply chains, it will drive innovation, efficiency, and sustainability in manufacturing. Organizations that proactively adapt to these changes and leverage the full potential of AM will be well-positioned to thrive in the evolving landscape of supply chain management.
References
- Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. Additive manufacturing. Materials Science and Technology 2016, 32, 615–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Xu, X.; Stringer, J. Support structures for additive manufacturing: a review. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 2018, 2, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blakey-Milner, B.; Gradl, P.; Snedden, G.; Brooks, M.; Pitot, J.; Lopez, E.; Du Plessis, A. Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review. Materials & Design 2021, 209, 110008. [Google Scholar]
- Milewski, J.O.; Milewski, J.O. Additive manufacturing metal, the art of the possible; Springer International Publishing, 2017; pp. 7–33. [Google Scholar]
- Subramani, R.; Vijayakumar, P.; Rusho, M.A.; Kumar, A.; Shankar, K.V.; Thirugnanasambandam, A.K. Selection and Optimization of Carbon-Reinforced Polyether Ether Ketone Process Parameters in 3D Printing—A Rotating Component Application. Polymers 2024, 16, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pou, J.; Riveiro, A.; Davim, J.P. (Eds.) Additive manufacturing; Elsevier, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Ford, S.; Despeisse, M. Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of cleaner Production 2016, 137, 1573–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, M.K.; Moroni, G.; Vaneker, T.; Fadel, G.; Campbell, R.I.; Gibson, I.; Martina, F. Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP annals 2016, 65, 737–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, M.; Mehrabi, H.; Naveed, N. An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 2022, 84, 1001–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raja, S.; AhmedMustafa, M.; KamilGhadir, G.; MusaadAl-Tmimi, H.; KhalidAlani, Z.; AliRusho, M.; Rajeswari, N. An analysis of polymer material selection and design optimization to improve Structural Integrity in 3D printed aerospace components. Applied Chemical Engineering 2024, 7, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Hsu, K.; Baughman, B.; Godfrey, D.; Medina, F.; Menon, M.; Wiener, S. Additive manufacturing of metals: the technology, materials, design and production. 2017.
- Wohlers, T.; Gornet, T.; Mostow, N.; Campbell, I.; Diegel, O.; Kowen, J.; …; Peels, J. History of additive manufacturing. 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Salmi, M. Additive manufacturing processes in medical applications. Materials 2021, 14, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klahn, C.; Leutenecker, B.; Meboldt, M. Design strategies for the process of additive manufacturing. Procedia Cirp 2015, 36, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponche, R.; Kerbrat, O.; Mognol, P.; Hascoet, J.Y. A novel methodology of design for Additive Manufacturing applied to Additive Laser Manufacturing process. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2014, 30, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Blache, R.; Xu, X. Selection of additive manufacturing processes. Rapid prototyping journal 2017, 23, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subramani, R.; Mustafa NM, A.; Ghadir NG, K.; Al-Tmimi NH, M.; Alani NZ, K.; Rusho, M.A.; Rajeswari, N.; Haridas, N.D.; Rajan N a, J.; Kumar N a, P. Exploring the use of Biodegradable Polymer Materials in Sustainable 3D Printing. Applied Chemical Engineering 2024, 7, 3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bose, S.; Ke, D.; Sahasrabudhe, H.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Progress in materials science 2018, 93, 45–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tofail, S.A.; Koumoulos, E.P.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S.; O’Donoghue, L.; Charitidis, C. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Materials today 2018, 21, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, N.; Leu, M.C. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Frontiers of mechanical engineering 2013, 8, 215–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raja, S.; AhmedMustafa, M.; KamilGhadir, G.; MusaadAl-Tmimi, H.; KhalidAlani, Z.; AliRusho, M.; Rajeswari, N. An analysis of polymer material selection and design optimization to improve Structural Integrity in 3D printed aerospace components. Applied Chemical Engineering 2024, 7, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, T.; Kennedy, J.V.; Potgieter, J. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manufacturing 2019, 30, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Lin, Y.; Tseng TL, B. A review on quality control in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2018, 24, 645–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasiya, G.; Shukla, A.; Saran, K. Additive manufacturing-a review. Materials Today: Proceedings 2021, 47, 6896–6901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Leu, M.C.; Mazumder, J.; Donmez, A. Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 2015, 137, 014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijayakumar, P.; Raja, S.; Rusho, M.A.; Balaji, G.L. Investigations on microstructure, crystallographic texture evolution, residual stress and mechanical properties of additive manufactured nickel-based superalloy for aerospace applications: role of industrial ageing heat treatment. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2024, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uriondo, A.; Esperon-Miguez, M.; Perinpanayagam, S. The present and future of additive manufacturing in the aerospace sector: A review of important aspects. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2015, 229, 2132–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horn, T.J.; Harrysson, O.L. Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Science progress 2012, 95, 255–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lipton, J.I.; Cutler, M.; Nigl, F.; Cohen, D.; Lipson, H. Additive manufacturing for the food industry. Trends in food science & technology 2015, 43, 114–123. [Google Scholar]
- Francois, M.M.; Sun, A.; King, W.E.; Henson, N.J.; Tourret, D.; Bronkhorst, C.A.; Walton, O. Modeling of additive manufacturing processes for metals: Challenges and opportunities. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 2017, 21, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DebRoy, T.; Wei, H.L.; Zuback, J.S.; Mukherjee, T.; Elmer, J.W.; Milewski, J.O.; …; Zhang, W. Additive manufacturing of metallic components–process, structure and properties. Progress in materials science 2018, 92, 112–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam, G.A.; Zimmer, D. On design for additive manufacturing: evaluating geometrical limitations. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2015, 21, 662–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costabile, G.; Fera, M.; Fruggiero, F.A.B.I.O.; Lambiase, A.; Pham, D. Cost models of additive manufacturing: A literature review. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 2017, 8, 263–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strano, G.; Hao, L.; Everson, R.M.; Evans, K.E. A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2013, 66, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sealy, M.P.; Madireddy, G.; Williams, R.E.; Rao, P.; Toursangsaraki, M. Hybrid processes in additive manufacturing. Journal of manufacturing Science and Engineering 2018, 140, 060801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).