Submitted:
18 July 2024
Posted:
19 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Loosening Soil and Root-Cutting Cotton Stalk Pulling the Setting Machine
2.1. The Structure and Working Principle of the Whole Machine
2.2. Technical Parameter
3. Calculation of Key Parameters of V-Shaped Root-Cutting Knife
3.1. Design of Slide Cutting Angle of V-Shaped Root-Cutting Knife
3.2. Design of Cutting Edge Angle of V-Shaped Root-Cutting Knife
3.3. Design of the Soil Entry Angle of the V-Shaped Root-Cutting Knife
4. Discrete Element Simulation of V-Shaped Root-Cutting Knife
4.1. Establishment of Discrete Element Interaction Model between V-Shaped Root-Cutting Knife and Root-soil Complex
4.2. Simulation Optimization of V-Shaped Root-Cutting Knife Parameters
4.2.1. Simulated Test
4.2.2. Test Result
5. Filed Test
6. Conlusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cheng, Y. Study on Fluctuation and Influencing Factors of Cotton Production in Xinjiang. Ph.D. Thesis, Shihezi University, Xinjiang, China, 2022. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Z.Y. Research on the adoption and effectiveness evaluation of agricultural socialized services in Xinjiang cotton region. Ph.D. Thesis, Shihezi University, Xinjiang, China, 2023. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Suraj, P.; Radha; Kanika, S.; Sangram, D.; Marisennayya, S.; Vishal, P.D.; Sunil, K.; Madhu.; T, A.; V, B.; Ravi, P.; Manoj, K. Unlocking the potential of cottonstalk as a renewable source ofcellulose: A review on advancementsand emerging applications. J. InternationalJournal of BiologicaL Macromolecules International journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024, 261, 129456. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, X.H.; Yan, L.H.; Guo, C.; Jia, D.Z.; Guo, N.N.; Wang, L.X. Synergistic Effects between Lignin, Cellulose and Coal in the Co-Pyrolysis Process of coal and Cotton Stalk. J. Molecules. 2023, 28, 5708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Narendra, R.; Yang, Y.Q. Properties and potential applications of natural cellulose fibers from the bark of cotton stalks. J. Bioresource Technology. 2009, 100, 3563–3569. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, C.G.; Wang, Z.B.; Ma, L.; Xu, Z.X.; Yu, J.M.; Li, F.G. Cotton stalk valorization towards bio-based materials, chemicals, and biofuels: A review. J. Renewable and Sustainable EnergyReviews. 2024, 202, 114651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.; Hou, X.L.; Ian, H.; Yang, Y.Q. Preparation and properties of cotton stalk bark fibers and their cotton blended yarns and fabrics. J. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016, 139, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Zhao, C.S.; Han, W.J.; Jiang, Y.F.; Wang, S. Preparation and Research of Environment-friendly Degradable Paper Mulching Film of Cotton Stalk Fiber. J. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2018, 199, 042052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, C.J.; Guo, H.J.; Dai, Y.M.; Li, F.; Cao, S.L.; Jin, X.W.; Shen, L.; Deng, Y. Situation and strategies of mechanization in recycling of cotton stalk in Xinjiang. J. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University. 2023, 42, 53–63. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.X.; Wang, T.Y.; Chen, M.J.; Zhao, W.S.; Wang, Z.W.; Yeerbolatl, T.M.E.; Wang, Y.C.; Liu, X.; Liu, A.P. Design of toothed disc cotton stalk harvester. J. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 2019, 35, 1–8. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Chen, M.J.; Zhao, W.S.; Wang, Z.W.; Liu, K.K.; Chen, Y.S.; Hu, Z.C. Operation Process Analysis and Parameter Optimization of Dentate Disc Cotton-stalk Uprooting Mechanism. J. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. 2019, 50, 109–120. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.X.; Rui, Z.Y.; Cai, J.L.; Wang, Y.C.; Yeerbolatl, T.M.E.; Gao, Z.M. Design and Test of Front Mounted Belt Clamping and Conveying Cotton-stalk Pulling Device. J. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. 2021, 52, 77–84. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Xie, J.H.; Wu, S.H.; Cao, S.L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, W.S.; Zhou, J.B. Design and Experiment of Clamping Roller Cotton Stalk Extraction Device. J. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. 2023, 54, 101–111. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Chen, M.J. Research on the Key Technology of Dentate Disc Cotton-stalk Uprooting Machine. Ph.D. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2022. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.X.; Yang, R.; Wang, Z.W.; Hou, C.F.; Wang, Y.C.; Cai, J.L.; Yasenjiang, B.K.L.; Guo, G. Design and test of the cottonstalk pulling equipment with toothed plate. J. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 2024, 40, 41–50. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Z.F.; Han, Z.D.; Gan, B.X.; Bao, C.L.; Hao, F.P. Design and Experient on Cotton Stalk Pullng Head with Regardless of Row. J. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010; 41, 80–85. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.X.; Ren, J.B.; Huang, W.L.; Chen, L.B.; Weng, W.X.; Chen, C.C.; Zheng, S.H. Design and Parameter Optimization of a Dual-Disc Trenching Device for Ecological Tea Plantations. J. Agriculture, 2024, 14, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Chen, J.; Zhu, Y.Y. Improved Design and Simulation of an Integrated Ridge-Breaking Earth Cultivator for Ratoon Sugarcane Fields. J. Agriculture, 2024, 14, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awuah, E.; Zhou, J.; Liang, Z.; Aikins, K.A.; Gbenontin, B.V.; Mecha, P.; Makange, N.R. Parametric analysis and numerical optimisation of Jerusalem artichoke vibrating digging shovel using discrete element method. J. Soil Tillage Res. 2022, 219, 105344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.Q.; Ni, X.; Song, K.; Wen, N.; Wang, J.W.; Fu, Q.; Na, M.J.; Tang, H.; Wang, Q. Bionic Optimization Design and Discrete Element Experimental Design of Carrot Combine Harvester Ripping Shovel. J. Processes 2023, 11, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, W.T.; Zhao, D.; Liu, C.; Meng, X.J.; Kong, L.H.; Du, W.H. Optimization of garlic digging shovel parameters based on EDEM and quadratic regression orthogonal rotation combination design. C. 2020 3rd World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing (WCMEIM), Shanghai, China, 2020; 707–711. [Google Scholar]
- Zou, L.L.; Yan, D.W.; Niu, Z.R.; Yuan, J.; Cheng, H.; Zheng, H. Parametric analysis and numericaloptimisation ofspinach root vibration shovel cutting using discreteelement method. J. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2023, 212, 108138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.H.; Weng, S.J.; Liao, Y.L.; Zhu, D.Y. Structural Bionic Design for Digging Shovel of cassava Harvester Considering Soil Mechanics. J. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics. 2014, 11, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.M.; Jin, Z.P.; Ai, A.J. The Optimized Design of Soil-Touching Parts of a Greenhouse Humanoid Weeding Shovel Based on Strain Sensing and DEM-ADAMS Coupling simulation. J. Sensors 2024, 24, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.Y. Study on Cotton Root and Shoot Morphological and Physiological Characteristies and Root Transcriptome under Low Nitrogen Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Hebei Agricultural University, Hebei, China, 2022. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Coetzee, C.J.; Lombard C J Coetzee, S.G.; Lombard, S.G. The destemming of grapes: experiments and discrete element modelling. J. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 114, 232–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Q.; Huang, X.P.; Wu, J.F.; Mou, X.B.; Li, S.Y.; Ma, G.J.; Wan, F.X.; Peng, L.Z. Simulation Analysis and Parameter Optimization of Seed-Flesh Separation Process of Seed Melon Crushing and Seed Extraction Separator Based on DEM. J. Agriculture, 2024, 14, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.L.; Lu, Y.T.; Peng, X.B.; Jiang, P.; Zhang, B.C.; Zhang, L.Y.; Meng, H.W.; Kan, Z.; Wang, X.Z. Discrete element method for simulation and calibration of cotton stalk contact parameters. J. BioResources. 2022, 18, 400–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.X.; Zang, P.; Zhang, H.; Tan, C.L.; Wan, W.Y.; Wang, Y.C. Calibration of Simulation Parameters of Xinjiang Cotton Straw Based on Discrete Element Method. J. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. 2023, 55, 11–16. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, D.L.; Chen, X.G.; Yan, L.M.; Gou, H.X.; Yang, J.C.; Li, Y. Parameter Calibration of Discrete Element Model for Cotton Rootstalk–Soil Mixture at Harvest Stage in Xinjiang Cotton Field. J. Agriculture. 2023, 13, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| parameter | value |
|---|---|
| Overall dimensions(length×width×height)/mm × mm × mm | 2570×2230×1400 |
| Working width/mm | 2000 |
| Width of V-shaped root-cutting knife/mm | 6 |
| Thickness of V-shaped root-cutting knife/mm | 6 |
| Working width of single V-shaped root-cutting knife/mm | 150 |
| Width of gathering device/mm | 150 |
| Operating speed/m s-1 | 1.5 |
| Reel wheel speed/r min-1 | 80 |
| Strips helicoidis speed/r min-1 | 140 |
| Parameter | Value | Parameter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density of soil/kg/m3 | 2300 | Coefficient of restitution of soil-soil | 0.6 |
| Poisson’s ratio of soil | 0.35 | Coefficient of static friction of soil-soil | 0.45 |
| Shear modulus of soil/MPa | 1.07 | Coefficient of rolling friction of soil-soil | 0.21 |
| Density of root/kg/m3 | 825.8 | Coefficient of restitution of root-root | 0.384 |
| Poisson’s ratio of root | 0.35 | Coefficient of static friction of root-root | 0.597 |
| Shear modulus of root/MPa | 692 | Coefficient of rolling friction of root-root | 0.06 |
| Density of shovel/kg/m3 | 7865 | Coefficient of restitution of root-soil | 0.453 |
| Poisson’s ratio of shovel | 0.3 | Coefficient of static friction of root-soil | 0.625 |
| Shear modulus of shovel/MPa | 7.9×104 | Coefficient of rolling friction of root-soil | 0.7 |
| Coefficient of restitution of soil-shovel | 0.6 | Coefficient of restitution of root-shovel | 0.429 |
| Coefficient of static friction of soil-shovel | 0.6 | Coefficient of static friction of root-shovel |
0.561 |
| Coefficient of rolling friction of soil-shovel | 0.05 | Coefficient of rolling friction of root-shovel |
0.08 |
| Normal Stiffness per it area of soil/N/m3 | 5.302×108 | Normal Stiffness per it area of root/N/m3 | 4.15×1010 |
| Shear Stiffness per uit area of soil/N/m3 | 4.486×108 | Shear Stiffness per uit area of root/N/m3 | 5.6×1010 |
| Normal gtrength of soil/Pa | 5.5×105 | Normal gtrength of root/Pa | 4×107 |
| Shear Strength of soil/Pa | 5.303×105 | Shear Strength of root/Pa | 5×107 |
| Bonded Disk Scale of soil | 2.4 | Bonded Disk Scale of root | 0.84 |
| Level | slide cutting angle X1(°) | cutting edge angle X2(°) | soil entry angle X3(°) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 36 | 43.2 | 13 |
| 0 | 45.5 | 53.35 | 29 |
| 1 | 55 | 63.5 | 45 |
| Test Number | X1 | X2 | X3 | root-breaking force | mean value of the cutting resistance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 226.6 | 46.8 |
| 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 122.9 | 64.4 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 144.1 | 76.6 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 140.7 | 64.5 |
| 5 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 98.6 | 70 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 108.2 | 78.7 |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 159.1 | 64 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 157.4 | 62.1 |
| 9 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 195.1 | 50.2 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 140.2 | 62.1 |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 157.4 | 79.1 |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 180.9 | 46.2 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 151.9 | 62.5 |
| 14 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 82.5 | 77.2 |
| 15 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 220.9 | 57.8 |
| 16 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 97.6 | 62 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 145.3 | 62.9 |
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F value | P value | Significant Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 26305.24 | 9 | 2922.8 | 49.42 | < 0.0001 | ** |
| A | 13719.96 | 1 | 13719.96 | 231.99 | < 0.0001 | ** |
| B | 3264.32 | 1 | 3264.32 | 55.2 | 0.0001 | ** |
| C | 1014.75 | 1 | 1014.75 | 17.16 | 0.0043 | ** |
| AB | 561.69 | 1 | 561.69 | 9.5 | 0.0178 | * |
| AC | 473.06 | 1 | 473.06 | 8 | 0.0255 | * |
| BC | 345.96 | 1 | 345.96 | 5.85 | 0.0462 | * |
| A² | 4082.29 | 1 | 4082.29 | 69.03 | <0.0001 | ** |
| B² | 3204.51 | 1 | 3204.51 | 54.18 | 0.0002 | ** |
| C² | 0.0059 | 1 | 0.0059 | 0.0001 | 0.9923 | / |
| Residual | 413.98 | 7 | 59.14 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 193.04 | 3 | 64.35 | 1.16 | 0.4267 | / |
| Pure Error | 220.94 | 4 | 55.24 | |||
| Cor Total | 26719.22 | 16 |
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F value | P value | Significant Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1656.8 | 9 | 184.09 | 99.87 | <0.0001 | ** |
| A | 1529.05 | 1 | 1529.05 | 829.52 | <0.0001 | ** |
| B | 0.005 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.0027 | 0.9599 | / |
| C | 45.13 | 1 | 45.13 | 24.48 | 0.0017 | ** |
| AB | 5.29 | 1 | 5.29 | 2.87 | 0.1341 | / |
| AC | 32.49 | 1 | 32.49 | 17.63 | 0.0040 | ** |
| BC | 14.44 | 1 | 14.44 | 7.83 | 0.0266 | * |
| A² | 0.0557 | 1 | 0.0557 | 0.0302 | 0.8669 | / |
| B² | 0.6241 | 1 | 0.6241 | 0.3386 | 0.5789 | / |
| C² | 29.9 | 1 | 29.9 | 16.22 | 0.0050 | ** |
| Residual | 12.9 | 7 | 1.84 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 8.94 | 3 | 2.98 | 3 | 0.1579 | / |
| Pure Error | 3.97 | 4 | 0.992 | |||
| Cor Total | 1669.7 | 16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).