Submitted:
17 July 2024
Posted:
18 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Regional Description
2.2. Data Description
2.3. Data Processing
2.4. Unsupervised Classification
2.5. Supervised Classification of High-Resolution Data
2.6. Derivation of NDVI
2.7. Validation and Accuracy
2.8. Mechanization Strategy, Land Resources and Ecosystem Management
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Land Use Mapping
3.2. Unsupervised Classification
3.3. Supervised Classification
3.4. Phenology
3.5. Areal Distribution of LULC Classes
3.6. Major Crop Rotations and Area
3.7. Accuracy Assessment
3.7.1. Ground Trothing
3.8. Mechanization Strategy
3.9. Land Resources and Ecosystem Management
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
References
- Viana, C. M., Freire, D., Abrantes, P., Rocha, J., & Pereira, P. (2022). Agricultural land systems importance for supporting food security and sustainable development goals: A systematic review. Science of the total environment, 806, 150718. [CrossRef]
- Blickensdörfer, L., Schwieder, M., Pflugmacher, D., Nendel, C., Erasmi, S., & Hostert, P. (2022). Mapping of crop types and crop sequences with combined time series of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Landsat 8 data for Germany. Remote sensing of environment, 269, 112831. [CrossRef]
- Takeshima, H., Hatzenbuehler, P. L., & Edeh, H. O. (2020). Effects of agricultural mechanization on economies of scope in crop production in Nigeria. Agricultural Systems, 177, 102691. [CrossRef]
- Saiz-Rubio, V., & Rovira-Más, F. (2020). From smart farming towards agriculture 5.0: A review on crop data management. Agronomy, 10(2), 207. [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y., Chen, Z. X., Tao, Y. U., Huang, X. Z., & Gu, X. F. (2018). Agricultural remote sensing big data: Management and applications. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(9), 1915-1931. [CrossRef]
- Wardlow, B. D., Egbert, S. L., & Kastens, J. H. (2007). Analysis of time-series MODIS 250 m vegetation index data for crop classification in the US Central Great Plains. Remote sensing of environment, 108(3), 290-310. [CrossRef]
- Arvor, D., Jonathan, M., Meirelles, M. S. P., Dubreuil, V., & Durieux, L. (2011). Classification of MODIS EVI time series for crop mapping in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(22), 7847-7871. [CrossRef]
- Li, Q., Wang, C., Zhang, B., & Lu, L. (2015). Object-based crop classification with Landsat-MODIS enhanced time-series data. Remote Sensing, 7(12), 16091-16107. [CrossRef]
- Mirzaei, A., Bagheri, H., & Khosravi, I. (2023). Enhancing Crop Classification Accuracy through Synthetic SAR-Optical Data Generation Using Deep Learning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(11), 450. [CrossRef]
- Ouzemou, J. E., El Harti, A., Lhissou, R., El Moujahid, A., Bouch, N., El Ouazzani, R., ... & El Ghmari, A. (2018). Crop type mapping from pansharpened Landsat 8 NDVI data: A case of a highly fragmented and intensive agricultural system. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 11, 94-103. [CrossRef]
- Wardlow, B. D., & Egbert, S. L. (2008). Large-area crop mapping using time-series MODIS 250 m NDVI data: An assessment for the US Central Great Plains. Remote sensing of environment, 112(3), 1096-1116. [CrossRef]
- Sergieieva, K., Kavats, O., Khramov, D., Vasyliev, V., & Kavats, I. (2018, December). Crop Classification and Monitoring using MODIS NDVI Time Series. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 2018, pp. GC51G-0861).
- Jehangir, W. A., Qureshi, A. S., & Ali, N. (2002). Conjunctive water management in the Rechna Doab: An overview of resources and issues.
- Evrendilek, F., & Gulbeyaz, O. (2008). Deriving vegetation dynamics of natural terrestrial ecosystems from MODIS NDVI/EVI data over Turkey. Sensors, 8(9), 5270-5302. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Biggs, T. W., Rao, P. G., & Bharati, L. (2010). Mapping agricultural responses to water supply shocks in large irrigation systems, southern India. Agricultural Water Management, 97(6), 924-932. [CrossRef]
- Cheema, M. J. M., & Bastiaanssen, W. G. (2010). Land use and land cover classification in the irrigated Indus Basin using growth phenology information from satellite data to support water management analysis. Agricultural water management, 97(10), 1541-1552. [CrossRef]
- Di Gregorio, A. (2005). Land cover classification system: classification concepts and user manual: LCCS (Vol. 2). Food & Agriculture Org.
- Ledwith, M. (2002, April). Land cover classification using SPOT Vegetation 10-day composite images–Baltic Sea catchment basin. In GLC2000 Meeting, Ispra, Italy, April (pp. 18-22).
- Dogan, H. M., & Kılıç, O. M. (2013). Modelling and mapping some soil surface properties of Central Kelkit Basin in Turkey by using Landsat-7 ETM+ images. International journal of remote sensing, 34(15), 5623-5640. [CrossRef]
- Latifovic, R., & Olthof, I. (2004). Accuracy assessment using sub-pixel fractional error matrices of global land cover products derived from satellite data. Remote sensing of Environment, 90(2), 153-165. [CrossRef]
- Ray, S. S., Dadhwal, V. K., & Navalgund, R. R. (2002). Performance evaluation of an irrigation command area using remote sensing: a case study of Mahi command, Gujarat, India. Agricultural water management, 56(2), 81-91. [CrossRef]
- Abdulraheem, M. I., Zhang, W., Li, S., Moshayedi, A. J., Farooque, A. A., & Hu, J. (2023). Advancement of remote sensing for soil measurements and applications: A comprehensive review. Sustainability, 15(21), 15444. [CrossRef]
- Raza, A., Syed, N. R., Fahmeed, R., Acharki, S., Aljohani, T. H., Hussain, S., ... & Abdo, H. G. (2024). Investigation of changes in land use/land cover using principal component analysis and supervised classification from operational land imager satellite data: a case study of under developed regions, Pakistan. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 73. [CrossRef]
- Md-Tahir, H., Zhang, J., Xia, J., Zhang, C., Zhou, H., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Rigid lugged wheel for conventional agricultural wheeled tractors–optimising traction performance and wheel–soil interaction in field operations. Biosystems engineering, 188, 14-23. [CrossRef]
- Md-Tahir, H., Zhang, J., Xia, J., Zhou, Y., Zhou, H., Du, J., & Mamona, H. (2021). Experimental investigation of traction power transfer indices of farm-tractors for efficient energy utilization in soil tillage and cultivation operations. Agronomy, 11(1), 168. [CrossRef]
- Sishodia, R. P., Ray, R. L., & Singh, S. K. (2020). Applications of remote sensing in precision agriculture: A review. Remote sensing, 12(19), 3136. [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, A., Ahmad, L., Ferooz, K., Ramzan, S., Ashraf, I., Khan, J. N., ... & Nazir, S. (2023). Remote Sensing as a Management and Monitoring Tool for Agriculture: Potential Applications. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(8), 324-343. [CrossRef]







| Data Type | Data Products/ Components | Data Sources | Data Specifications | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote Sensing Satellite data | MODIS (Land) | MYD13Q1=Aqua MOD13Q1=Terra |
https://wist.echo.nasa.gov/api/ | NDVI 250 m 2 spectral bands |
| Landsat | Landsat5 TM | glovis.usgs.gov | 30 m, 7 spectral bands |
|
| Agriculture crops data | Agricultural census data, cropping patterns, Crop Calendar. | Concerned agricultural departments and organizations | For a year, the whole cropping cycle | |
| MODIS Aqua and MODIS Terra data types | ||
| Descriptions | MYD13Q1 | MOD13Q1 |
| Acquisition Year (2001) Julian Day (001) Horizontal Tile Vertical Tile Production Version Production Year Production Julian Day Production Time (HH:MM:SS) Temporal Resolution Spatial Resolution Major Content of Product HDF-EOS Format data file |
A2008297 h24 v05 .005 2008 315 064818 16DAY 250m Vegetation Indices(VI) Hdf |
A2008305 h24 v05 .005 2008 327 041157 16DAY 250m Vegetation Indices(VI) Hdf |
| Sensor | Bands | Wavelength (µm) | Resolution (m) | Key uses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MODIS | Band 1 | 0.62–0.67 | 250 | Land cover and VI |
| Band 2 | 0.84–0.87 | 250 | Land cover and VI | |
| Landsat 4-5 TM | Band 1 | 0.45-0.52 | 30 | Land cover |
| Band 2 | 0.52-0.60 | 30 | Land cover | |
| Band 3 | 0.63-0.69 | 30 | Land cover | |
| Band 4 | 0.76-0.90 | 30 | Land cover | |
| Band 5 | 1.55-1.75 | 30 | Land cover | |
| Band 6 | 10.40-12.50 | 120* (30) | Land Temperature | |
| Band 7 | 2.08-2.35 | 30 | Land cover |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).