Submitted:
12 July 2024
Posted:
14 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Method
4. Results and Findings
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
References
- Aguinis, H.; Glavas, A. On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. J. Manag. 2019, 45, 1057–1086. [CrossRef]
- Barney, J.B.; Hesterly, W.S. Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases, 6th ed.; Pearson: Hong Kong, China.
- Carroll, A.B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus. Horiz. 1991, 34, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, D.; Werther, W.B., Jr. Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment; SAGE Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Crane, A.; Matten, D.; Spence, L.J. Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context, 2nd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Emon, M.H. A systematic review of the causes and consequences of price hikes in Bangladesh. Rev. Bus. Econ. Stud. 2004, 53, 51–71. [Google Scholar]
- Emon, M.M.H.; Chowdhury, M.S.A. Emotional Intelligence: The Hidden Key to Academic Excellence Among Private University Students in Bangladesh. Malays. Ment. Health J. 2024, 3, 12–21. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T.; Siam, S.A.J. Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: An investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Braz. J. Oper. Amp; Prod. Manag. 2024, 21, 2015. [CrossRef]
- Epstein, M.J.; Buhovac, A.R. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts; Berrett-Koehler Publishers: Oakland, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Freeman, R.E.; Harrison, J.S.; Wicks, A.C.; Parmar, B.L.; De Colle, S. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Garriga, E.; Melé, D. Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. J. Bus. Ethics 2004, 53, 51–71. [CrossRef]
- Greenwood, M. Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2007, 74, 315–327. [CrossRef]
- Hahn, R.; Weidtmann, C. Corporate social responsibility and supply chain resilience: A review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 167, 223–245. [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, M.; Ibanez, V.A. Corporate social responsibility in Latin America: An overview of the firms and their environment. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 69, 297–316. [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Li, Y. CSR and service brand: The mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 100, 673–688. [CrossRef]
- Heath, J.; Norman, W. Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? J. Bus. Ethics 2004, 53, 247–265. [CrossRef]
- Idowu, S.O.; Capaldi, N.; Zu, L.; Gupta, A.D. Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Jain, T.; Jamali, D. Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate social responsibility on employee organizational identification. Bus. Ethics A Eur. Rev. 2016, 25, 63–79. [CrossRef]
- Jones, T.M. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 404–437. [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Siam, S.A.J. Impact of Green Supply Chain Practices on Sustainable Development in Bangladesh. Malays. Bus. Manag. J. 2024, 3, 73–83. [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Rahman, M.A.; Hamid, A.B.A. Internal Branding Essentials: The Roadmap to Organizational Success; Notion Press: Chennai, India, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, T.; Khanam, S.N.; Rahman, M.H.; Rahman, S.M. Determinants of microfinance facility for installing solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh. Energy Policy 2019, 132, 299–308. [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Rahman, S.M.; Hasan, M.M. Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh. Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Adv. 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolk, A. The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. J. World Bus. 2016, 51, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotler, P.; Lee, N. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.D.P. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2008, 10, 53–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maignan, I.; Ferrell, O.C. Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2004, 32, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margolis, J.D.; Walsh, J.P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Adm. Sci. Q. 2003, 48, 268–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matten, D.; Moon, J. Corporate social responsibility: A case study approach; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2001, 26, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, J. Corporate social responsibility: A very short introduction; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- O'Rourke, D. The science of sustainability: Environmental, social, economic, and ethical principles. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2010, 1, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2006, 84, 78–92. [Google Scholar]
- Scherer, A.G.; Palazzo, G. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 1096–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 2001, 38, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, L.J.; Rutherfoord, R. Social responsibility, profit maximisation and the small firm owner-manager. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2003, 10, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waddock, S.A.; Graves, S.B. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997, 18, 303–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Motivation | Description |
|---|---|
| Ethical Considerations | Many e-commerce firms cited ethical considerations as a primary motivation for adopting CSR in supplier relationship management. This includes a commitment to fair labor practices, ethical sourcing, and respect for human rights throughout their supply chains. Ethical motivations reflect a desire to align corporate values with societal expectations and promote responsible business conduct globally. |
| Regulatory Compliance | Compliance with regulatory standards and industry guidelines emerged as a significant driver for integrating CSR into supplier relationships. E-commerce firms emphasized the importance of adhering to environmental regulations, labor laws, and corporate governance requirements to mitigate legal risks and ensure operational transparency. Regulatory motivations underscore the role of CSR in enhancing corporate accountability and regulatory compliance across diverse market environments. |
| Stakeholder Expectations | Meeting stakeholder expectations, including those of consumers, investors, and advocacy groups, was identified as a critical motivation for adopting CSR practices in SRM. E-commerce firms recognized the influence of stakeholders in shaping corporate reputations and market perceptions, driving them to prioritize CSR initiatives that align with stakeholder values and preferences. Responding to stakeholder expectations through CSR helps build trust and credibility, enhancing brand reputation and customer loyalty in competitive markets. |
| Challenge | Description |
|---|---|
| Resource Constraints | Resource constraints, including financial limitations and limited expertise, posed significant challenges for e-commerce firms in implementing CSR in SRM. These constraints hindered investment in sustainable technologies, supplier audits, and CSR training programs, limiting the scalability and effectiveness of CSR initiatives across supply chains. |
| Regulatory Complexity | Navigating regulatory complexity across global supply chains presented operational challenges for e-commerce firms. Varied regulatory standards and compliance requirements across different markets required firms to adopt adaptive strategies to ensure consistency and compliance with CSR practices. Regulatory complexities contributed to operational inefficiencies and increased administrative burdens, impacting the implementation of CSR in supplier relationships. |
| Cultural Differences | Cultural differences among suppliers and stakeholders posed challenges for e-commerce firms in integrating CSR into SRM. Divergent cultural norms, ethical values, and business practices required firms to navigate cultural sensitivities and adapt CSR strategies to local contexts. Addressing cultural differences facilitated effective communication, trust-building, and collaboration with suppliers, enhancing the alignment of CSR practices with stakeholder expectations. |
| Impact | Description |
|---|---|
| Trust and Collaboration | CSR initiatives were found to enhance trust and collaboration between e-commerce firms and their suppliers. Transparent communication, shared values, and ethical business practices fostered mutual trust and strengthened long-term partnerships. Trust-based relationships facilitated collaboration in innovation, quality improvement, and supply chain resilience, contributing to operational efficiency and competitive advantage. |
| Risk Mitigation | CSR-driven supplier relationships played a critical role in mitigating supply chain risks for e-commerce firms. By promoting ethical sourcing, environmental sustainability, and compliance with regulatory standards, CSR initiatives helped mitigate risks related to supplier reliability, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Risk mitigation strategies supported continuity in supply chain operations and enhanced organizational resilience in dynamic market environments. |
| Innovation and Product Quality | CSR practices in SRM stimulated innovation and improved product quality within e-commerce supply chains. Suppliers aligned their practices with CSR standards to meet consumer expectations for sustainable and high-quality products, driving innovation in product design, manufacturing processes, and market responsiveness. Enhanced product quality and innovation capabilities enabled firms to differentiate their brands and capture market opportunities in competitive e-commerce markets. |
| Strategic Outcome | Description |
|---|---|
| Brand Equity | Integrating CSR in Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) enhances brand equity for e-commerce firms. By demonstrating commitment to ethical sourcing, environmental sustainability, and social responsibility, firms build positive brand perceptions among consumers and stakeholders. Brand equity influences consumer preferences and purchasing decisions, driving market differentiation and competitive advantage in saturated e-commerce markets. |
| Competitive Advantage | CSR-driven SRM strategies enable e-commerce firms to gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. By differentiating their brands through CSR initiatives, firms attract socially conscious consumers and investors who prioritize sustainability and ethical business practices. Competitive advantage derived from CSR enhances market positioning and profitability, fostering long-term business success and resilience against market fluctuations. |
| Long-term Value Creation | CSR integration in SRM fosters long-term value creation for e-commerce firms. Sustainable supplier relationships and ethical business practices contribute to operational efficiency, cost savings, and innovation within supply chains. Long-term value creation encompasses financial benefits, such as reduced costs and enhanced profitability, as well as intangible benefits, including enhanced corporate reputation and stakeholder trust. |
| Limitation/Trade-off | Description |
|---|---|
| Economic Trade-offs | Economic trade-offs pose challenges for e-commerce firms integrating CSR in SRM. Balancing short-term financial objectives with long-term sustainability goals requires strategic alignment and prioritization of CSR initiatives. Economic considerations, such as initial investment costs in CSR implementation and competitive pricing pressures, may impact profitability and financial performance in the short term. |
| Stakeholder Divergence | Divergent stakeholder expectations present challenges for e-commerce firms in aligning CSR practices with diverse stakeholder interests. Balancing stakeholder demands for transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct requires adaptive CSR strategies that address varying stakeholder priorities and preferences. Managing stakeholder divergence is critical for maintaining trust and credibility in supplier relationships and enhancing corporate reputation in competitive markets. |
| Operational Complexity | Operational complexity arises from the implementation of CSR in global supply chains within the e-commerce sector. Managing regulatory compliance, cultural differences, and supply chain logistics requires robust governance frameworks and operational strategies. Operational complexities impact efficiency, scalability, and risk management in CSR-driven SRM practices, necessitating continuous improvement and adaptive management approaches. |
| Recommendation | Description |
|---|---|
| Strategic Alignment | Align CSR initiatives with core business objectives and stakeholder expectations to enhance relevance and impact in e-commerce SRM. Integrate CSR into strategic planning processes, ensuring alignment with corporate values, market dynamics, and regulatory requirements. Strategic alignment facilitates cohesive implementation and communication of CSR practices across supply chains, driving sustainable business practices and competitive advantage. |
| Stakeholder Engagement | Engage stakeholders, including suppliers, consumers, investors, and advocacy groups, in the development and implementation of CSR strategies. Foster transparent communication, collaboration, and feedback mechanisms to address stakeholder expectations and enhance trust in supplier relationships. Stakeholder engagement promotes shared accountability for CSR outcomes and fosters a culture of ethical conduct and sustainability within e-commerce operations. |
| Continuous Improvement | Embrace a culture of continuous improvement in CSR-driven SRM practices to adapt to evolving market dynamics and stakeholder expectations. Implement robust monitoring, evaluation, and reporting mechanisms to assess CSR performance, identify areas for enhancement, and demonstrate tangible outcomes. Continuous improvement fosters innovation, efficiency, and resilience in supply chain operations, reinforcing the long-term sustainability and competitiveness of e-commerce firms. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).