Submitted:
17 June 2024
Posted:
17 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Study of the distribution law of the detector power curve
2.1. Principle and Curve Distribution Law of Gas Ionisation Chamber Detectors
2.2. Derivation of Particle Energy Loss Laws for Gas Ionisation Chambers
3. Research Data Collection and Data Analysis
3.1. Field Experiment Data Collection and Analysis
3.2. Processing of Experimental Data
3.3. Analysis of Detector Data and Its Correction Study
3.4. Analysis of Results and Performance Evaluation
4. Summary
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- LIU Yangyang,LI Wenping. Design of nuclear instrumentation system for Qinshan nuclear power plant phase II project. Nuclear Power Engineering 2003, 24, 238–240,248.
- Huang GQ,Lai W,Chen YZ,et al. Design of TMSR off-heap nuclear measurement system. Instrumentation User 2018, 25, 73–75.
- WEN Yanhui,GUO Guoyun,SHA Hongwei. Analysis and treatment of aging trend of power range detector for off-heap neutron flux measurement system in nuclear power plants. Instrumentation User 2017, 24, 76–81.
- Chi Yukai,Wu Pintao. A method for supervising the performance of intermediate-range detectors in RPN systems. Nuclear Electronics and Detection Technology 2021, 41, 528–532.
- Arbitrary. Research and design of commissioning programme for nuclear measurement instrumentation outside the third generation pressurized water reactor. Automation Instrumentation 2021, 42, 237–241.
- CHEN Siming,SHI Xuefeng,XIU Luqian. Application analysis of off-heap nuclear measurement instrumentation in the start-stop process of pressurised water reactor nuclear power plant. Shandong Industrial Technology 2018, 98.
- MENG Fanfeng,GENG Fei,CAI Guangming. Dynamic stick-carving test based on intermediate range measurement of off-heap nuclear instrumentation system at Fuqing Nuclear Power Plant. Nuclear Power Engineering 2020, 41, 30–33.
- HU Chuxuan,LI Shucheng. Calculation of combustion consumption of off-heap nuclear measurement detector assembly in nuclear power plants. Nuclear Electronics and Detection Technology 2018, 38, 326–329.
- LU Jian, HUANG Jing, CAI Haoting, et al. Research on overhaul method of detector of off-heap nuclear measurement system. Instrumentation User 2023, 30, 57–61.
- LU Jian, HUANG Jing, CAI Haoting, et al. Design and overhaul maintenance of the detector of off-heap nuclear power measurement system in Qinshan nuclear power plant phase II. Instrumentation user 2019, 26, 48–52.
- WU Pingtao. Application of nuclear detection technology in nuclear power plants. Electrotechnology 2022, 37–39.
- Zhao, R. Shun. Distribution law of ideal gas molecules by potential energy in a conservative force field. Journal of Liaoning University (Natural Science Edition) 2002, 29, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
- Yuki Sato, A. Taketani, N. Fukuda, et al. Energy resolution of gas ionisation chamber for high-energy heavy ions. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2013, 53, 016401–016401. [Google Scholar]
- ZHU Pengfei,LU Jian,HUANG Jing,et al. FMEA analysis and equipment classification of the off-heap nuclear measurement system of Qinji plant. Instrumentation User 2022, 29, 53–56.
- LU Jian, TONG Jie, ZHOU Chenhao, et al. Mid- and long-term management and optimisation of an off-heap nuclear measurement system for a nuclear power plant. Science and Innovation 2022, 115-118.
- Zou Cheng, Zhang Mi, Chen Lei, et al. Research on the technical scheme of automatic test device for signal processing cabinet of off-heap nuclear measurement system. Nuclear Electronics and Detection Technology 2022, 42, 435–439.
- LU Jian, LI Jiayuan, GE Meng, et al. Research on project management and implementation of technical transformation of nuclear measurement system. Instrumertation User 2022, 29, 44–48.












| Curve Colour | green | blue | orange | greenish black |
| data time | 2011-01-09 | 2012-2-20 | 2013-03-26 | 2014-04-01 |
| Slope of the ping curve | 2.739e-9 | 3.924e-9 | 2.474e-9 | 3.493e-9 |
| Ping curve intercept | 0.0003621 | 0.0003577 | 0.0003532 | 0.0003771 |
| The normal fit parameter i | 0.9444 | 0.9947 | 0.9957 | 0.9942 |
| The normal fit parameter j | 0.4557 | 0.4522 | 0.4500 | 0.4671 |
| The normal fitting parameter k | 2.467 | 2.465 | 2.437 | 2.529 |
| Normal fit parameters l | 2.384e-6 | 2.314e-6 | 2.197e-6 | 2.392e-6 |
| Normal fit parameters sv02 | 4.1188e+156 | 1.7562e+160 | 1.6777e+160 | 1.8435e+160 |
| Precise inflection point voltage | 396.2 | 389.5 | 393.2 | 399.2 |
| Precise inflection point current | 3.632e-4 | 3.593e-4 | 3.542e-4 | 3.785e-4 |
| Curve Colour | blue | green | orange | greenish black |
| data time | 2011-01-10 | 2012-3-10 | 2013-03-30 | 2014-04-08 |
| Slope of the ping curve | 2.358e-13 | 3.172e-13 | 2.762e-13 | 3.127e-13 |
| Ping curve intercept | 2.458e-11 | 3.281e-11 | 2.881e-11 | 3.260e-11 |
| The normal fit parameter i | 1.090 | 1.089 | 1.151 | 1.089 |
| The normal fit parameter j | 0.5637 | 0.6195 | 0.5298 | 0.5848 |
| The normal fitting parameter k | 0.4752 | 0.4884 | 0.025 | 0.4847 |
| Normal fit parameters l | 8.739e-12 | 6.835e-12 | 1.525e-9 | 9.808e-12 |
| Normal fit parameters sv02 | 1.567e+158 | 7.882e+157 | 1.029 | 1.574e+158 |
| Precise inflection point voltage | -34.95 | -26.92 | -36.95 | -32.99 |
| Precise inflection point current | 1.633e-11 | 2.427e-11 | 1.861e-11 | 2.228e-11 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).