Submitted:
04 June 2024
Posted:
06 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data and Study Area
3.2. Methodology

3. Results Analysis and Discussion
3.1. Entire Study Area
- i)
- Elevation
- ii)
- Slope
- iii)
- Settlements
3.2. Z1 and Z2
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bao, L.; Lv, X.; Yao, J. Water Extraction in SAR Images Using Features Analysis and Dual-Threshold Graph Cut Model. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Feng, M.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, N.; Huang, J.; Xiao, T. An Automated Method for Extracting Rivers and Lakes from Landsat Imagery. Remote Sensing. Journal 2014, www.mdpi.
- Al-Bakri, M.; Fairbairn, D. Assessing the accuracy of ‘Crowdsourced’ data and its integration with official spatial datasets. In: Proc. Symp. Accuracy Abbreviated Journal 2010, Leicester, UK, 317-320.
- Biljecki, F.; Chow, Y.S.; Lee, K. Quality of crowdsourced geospatial building information: A global assessment of OpenStreetMap attributes. Building and Environment 2023, 237, 110295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Girres, J.F.; Touya, G. Quality assessment of the french OpenStreetMap dataset. Trans. GIS 2010, 14, 435–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 19157. Geographic Information – Data Quality. ISO No. 19157 2013, Tech. Rep, 146pp.
- Barrington-Leigh, C.; Millard-Ball, A. The world's user-generated road map is more than 80% complete. PLoS One 2017, 12, e0180698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goodchild, M.F. Geographic Information Systems and Science: today and tomorrow. Annals of GIS – Taylor & Francis 2009, 15, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Wei, Z. Assessing completeness of global airport data in OSM. Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the International Cartographic Association, International Cartographic Conference (ICC 2023), 13-18 August 2023, Cape Town, South Africa.
- Hecht, R.; Kunze, C.; Hahmann, S. Measuring Completeness of Building Footprints in OpenStreetMap over Space and Time. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2013, 2, 1066–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brovelli, M.A.; Zamboni, G.A. New Method for the Assessment of Spatial Accuracy and Completeness of OpenStreetMap Building Footprints. ISPRS International Journal of Geo Information 2018, 7, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, T.; Lautenbach, S.; Herfort, B.; Reinmuth, M.; Schorlemmer, D. Assessing Completeness of OpenStreetMap Building Footprints Using MapSwipe. International Journal of Geoinformation 2023, 20pp. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herfort, B.; Lautenbach, A.; Albuquerque, J.P.; Anderson, J.; Zipf, A. A spatio-temporal analysis investigating completeness and inequalities of global urban building data in OpenStreetMap. Nature Communications 2023, 14pp. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeboah, G.; Porto de Albuquerque, J.; Troilo, R.; Tregonning, G.; Perera, S.; Ahmed, S.A.K.S.; Ajisola, M.; Alam, O.; Aujla, N.; Azam, S.I.; et al. Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data Quality at Different Stages of a Participatory Mapping Process: Evidence from Slums in Africa and Asia. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neis, P.; Zielstra, D.; Zipf, A. The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet 2012, 4, 1–21 doiorg/103390/fi4010001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, S.P.; Mullen, W.; Agouris, P.; Crooks, A.; Croitoru, A.; Stefanidis, A. Assessing Completeness and Spatial Error of Features in Volunteered Geographic Information. ISPRS – International Journal of Geo-Information 2013, 2, 507–530; [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brückner, J.; Schott, M.; Zipf, A.; Lautenbach, S. Assessing shop completeness in OpenStreetMap for two federal states in Germany. AGILE GIScience Ser. 2021, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Zhou, Q.; Tian, Y. Understanding Completeness and DiversityPatterns of OSM-Based Land-Use and Land Cover Dataset in China. ISPRS – Int. J. of Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barron, C.; Neis, P.; Zipf, A. A Comprehensive Framework for Intrinsic OpenStreetMap Quality Analysis. Transactions in GIS, 2014, 6, 877–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampaio, T.V.M.; Rocha, J. On the Quality of the drainage network cartographic representation. Ecological Indicators 2022, 143, 109350, ISSN 1470–160X. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afonso, A.; Lopes, J.; Dias, R. Controlo de Qualidade Posicional da Cartografia Militar do IGeoE em ETRS89. Report of IGeoE 2010, 5pp. [Google Scholar]
- Herfort, B.; Lautenbach, S.; Porto de Albuquerque, J.; Anderson, J.; Zipf, A. The evolution of humanitarian mapping within the OpenStreetMap community. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herfort, B.; Lautenbach, S.; de Albuquerque, J.P.; Anderson, J.; Zipf, A. Investigating the digital divide in OpenStreetMap: Spatio-temporal analysis of inequalities in global urban building completeness. 2022, preprint.
- Quattrone, G.; Mashhadi, A.; Capra, L. Mind the map: The impact of culture and economic affluence on crowd-mapping behaviours. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing-CSCW ‘14, Baltimore, MD, USA, 15–19 February 2014; ACM Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2014; pp. 934–944. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, K.; Brovelli, M.A. Assessing OSM building completeness for almost 13, 000 cities globally. International Journal of Digital Earth 2022, 15, 2400–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borkowska, S.; Bielecka, E.; Pokonieczny, K. OpenStreetMap – building data completeness visualization in terms of “Fitness for purpose”. Advances in Geodesy and Geoinformation, 72, 20pp. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Brovelli, M.A.; Li, W. Assessing OSM Building Completeness Using Population Data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2022, 36, 1443–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]














| Watercourses | Total Length (m) | Completeness (%) | N. of rivers | N. of streams |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 555 635 | |||
| OSM - 2014 | 60 183 | 10,8 | 7 | 8 |
| OSM - 2023 | 145 303 | 26,2 | 9 | 72 |
| Watercourses | Total Length (m) | Completeness (%) | N. of rivers | N. of streams |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 64 414 | |||
| OSM - 2014 | 8 904 | 13,8 | 1 | 2 |
| OSM - 2023 | 13 974 | 21,7 | 1 | 5 |
| Watercourses | Total Length (m) | Completeness (%) | N. of rivers | N. of streams |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 69 784 | |||
| OSM - 2014 | 12 527 | 18,0 | 1 | 2 |
| OSM - 2023 | 22 037 | 31,6 | 3 | 6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).