Submitted:
23 May 2024
Posted:
24 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- Domestic wastewater
- Treated with Constructed Wetlands (Cws)
- Well water

3. Results
- Constructed Wetlands (Cws): During this study over a period of one year (January – December 2023), the average climatic conditions of 26°C, relative humidity of 87% and an average solar radiation of 155 W/m2 were those that provided an adequate adaptive environment for the two types of ornamental plants in the wetland system grew; Hippeastrum Hybridum Hort It reached a height of 35cm and Heliconia Bihai Marginata a height of 90cm. On the other hand, the average light intensity of this study was 1235.24 lux, which is within the intensity ranges of tropical areas (500 to 2,100 lux) [26].
- Remotion of contaminants. It can be seen in Table 4 that the removal of the pollutants DQO, NT, NH4, NO2-N, PT, PO₄³⁻ and TDS are above 90%, considering the input values (IC), output values (EC) and the removal percentage (Removal (%)). The text continues here.
- Design of Experiments - solution technique analysis of variance
- Phaseolus vulgaris cultivation
- 2.
- Biometric development of plants.
- 3.
- Harvest yield
- Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis.
- Food safety the Phaseolus vulgaris
| RM | Test | Unidad | Result | Analysis Data | CA | |
| first | finalize | |||||
| A | MICROBIOLOGICAL TEST METHODS (SALMONELLA SPP) IN FOOD | g | ABSENCE IN 25 | 2024/02/23 | 2024/02/27 | FSPH |
| RM | Test | Unidad | Result | Analysis Data | CA | |
| first | finalize | |||||
| A | MICROBIOLOGICAL (E. COLI) TEST METHOD BY NMP IN FOOD AND WATER. | NMP/g | < 3 | 2024/02/23 | 2024/02/25 | FSPH |
- ✓
- The analysis indicates that for both tests the Phaseolus vulgaris culture is free of Escherichia coli and Salmonella.
4. Conclusions
References
- M. S. M. Al-Azzawi et al., “Validation of Sample Preparation Methods for Microplastic Analysis in Wastewater Matrices—Reproducibility and Standardization,” Water, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 2445, Aug. 2020. [CrossRef]
- A. L. Andrady, “Microplastics in the marine environment,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1596–1605, Aug. 2011. [CrossRef]
- A. Dick Vethaak and J. Legler, “Microplastics and human health: Knowledge gaps should be addressed to ascertain the health risks of microplastics,” Science (80-. )., vol. 371, no. 6530, pp. 672–674, 2021. [CrossRef]
- G. Castañeta, A. F. Gutiérrez, F. Nacaratte, and C. A. Manzano, “MICROPLASTICS: A CONTAMINANT THAT GROWS IN ALL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS, ITS CHARACTERISTICS AND POSSIBLE RISKS TO PUBLIC HEALTH FROM EXPOSURE,” Rev. Boliv. Química, vol. 37, no. 3, Aug. 2020. [CrossRef]
- A. D. Vethaak and V. U. Amsterdam, “The Emerging Health Crisis of Microplastic Debris,” no. November, 2022.
- N. Arshad et al., “Microplastic contamination from surface waters and commercially valuable fishes of Karachi Coast, Pakistan,” Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., vol. 62, p. 102955, Sep. 2023. [CrossRef]
- M. Bläsing and W. Amelung, “Plastics in soil: Analytical methods and possible sources,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 612, pp. 422–435, Jan. 2018. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhang, S. Kang, S. Allen, D. Allen, T. Gao, and M. Sillanpää, “Atmospheric microplastics: A review on current status and perspectives,” Earth-Science Rev., vol. 203, p. 103118, Apr. 2020. [CrossRef]
- H. Zhang, Y. Huang, S. An, and Z. Zhu, “A Review of Microplastics in Soil: Distribution Within Pedosphere Compartments, Environmental Fate, and Effects,” Water, Air, Soil Pollut., vol. 233, no. 9, p. 380, Sep. 2022. [CrossRef]
- S. S. Mendoza-Retana, M. G. Cervantes-Vázquez, A. A. Valenzuela-Garcia, T. L. Guzmán-Silos, I. Orona-Castillo, and T. J. Á. Cervantes-Vázquez, “Uso potencial de las aguas residuales en la agricultura,” Rev. Mex. Ciencias Agrícolas, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 115–126, Jan. 2021. [CrossRef]
- H. Yasuor, U. Yermiyahu, and A. Ben-Gal, “Consequences of irrigation and fertigation of vegetable crops with variable quality water: Israel as a case study,” Agric. Water Manag., vol. 242, p. 106362, Dec. 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. D. Chowdhury, R. Bandyopadhyay, and P. Bhunia, “Reutilization of sludge as fertilizer,” in Clean Energy and Resource Recovery, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 423–434. [CrossRef]
- L. A. Dirección et al., “Facultad De Ciencias Económicas Administrativas Y Contables Escuela Profesional De Administración Tesis,” 2019.
- I. Rashmi et al., “Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Contaminants in Agriculture: Impact on Soil and Water Resources,” in Contaminants in Agriculture, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 3–41. [CrossRef]
- S. Shukla and A. Saxena, “Global Status of Nitrate Contamination in Groundwater: Its Occurrence, Health Impacts, and Mitigation Measures,” in Handbook of Environmental Materials Management, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 1–21. [CrossRef]
- I. Ortíz, M. A. Avila-Chávez, and L. G. Torres, “Plaguicidas en México: usos, riesgos y marco regulatorio,” Rev. Latinoam. Biotecnol. Ambient. y Algal, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 3, Oct. 2014. [CrossRef]
- B. Z. Houlton et al., “A World of Cobenefits: Solving the Global Nitrogen Challenge,” Earth’s Futur., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 865–872, Aug. 2019. [CrossRef]
- A. Arredondo-Navarro and D. X. Flores-Cervantes, “Microplastics in water and sediments: Sampling, detection, characterization methods & quality control-A review,” Tecnol. y Ciencias del Agua, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 474–522, 2023. [CrossRef]
- Q. Xu et al., “Investigation of the microplastics profile in sludge from China’s largest Water reclamation plant using a feasible isolation device,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 388, p. 122067, Apr. 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. Brodhagen, J. R. Goldberger, D. G. Hayes, D. A. Inglis, T. L. Marsh, and C. Miles, “Policy considerations for limiting unintended residual plastic in agricultural soils,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 69, pp. 81–84, Mar. 2017. [CrossRef]
- O. S. Alimi, J. Farner Budarz, L. M. Hernandez, and N. Tufenkji, “Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Aquatic Environments: Aggregation, Deposition, and Enhanced Contaminant Transport,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1704–1724, Feb. 2018. [CrossRef]
- A. A. Horton, C. Svendsen, R. J. Williams, D. J. Spurgeon, and E. Lahive, “Large microplastic particles in sediments of tributaries of the River Thames, UK – Abundance, sources and methods for effective quantification,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 218–226, Jan. 2017. [CrossRef]
- P. Wanner, “Plastic in agricultural soils – A global risk for groundwater systems and drinking water supplies? – A review,” Chemosphere, vol. 264, p. 128453, Feb. 2021. [CrossRef]
- G. Martinez Reséndiz, L. C. Sandoval Herazo, and L. F. Juárez Santillán, “Los humedales construidos: una estrategia para el tratamiento sustentable del agua residual,” Impluvium, Publicación Digit. la Red del Agua UNAM, vol. 21, 2022.
- D. C. Cabrera, Q. Wang, M. Martín, N. O. Rajadel, D. P. L. Rousseau, and C. Hernández-Crespo, “Microplastics occurrence and fate in full-scale treatment wetlands,” Water Res., vol. 240, p. 120106, Jul. 2023. [CrossRef]
- L. Sandoval-Herazo, A. Alvarado-Lassman, J. Marín-Muñiz, J. Méndez-Contreras, and S. A. Zamora-Castro, “Effects of the Use of Ornamental Plants and Different Substrates in the Removal of Wastewater Pollutants through Microcosms of Constructed Wetlands,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 1594, May 2018. [CrossRef]
- Y. Chen et al., “Transport and fate of microplastics in constructed wetlands: A microcosm study,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 415, p. 125615, Aug. 2021. [CrossRef]
- J. L. Marín-Muñiz et al., “Treatment Wetlands in Mexico for Control of Wastewater Contaminants: A Review of Experiences during the Last Twenty-Two Years,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 359, Jan. 2023. [CrossRef]
- L. Sandoval, S. Zamora-Castro, M. Vidal-Álvarez, and J. Marín-Muñiz, “Role of Wetland Plants and Use of Ornamental Flowering Plants in Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: A Review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 685, Feb. 2019. [CrossRef]
- D. A. Jaramillo Chamba, W. V. Panchana Gonzalez, A. Y. Cumbicos Calva, and N. E. Escudero Molina, “Sistema de riego inteligente para el mantenimiento de áreas verdes en una institución educativa,” Rev. Científica y Tecnológica UPSE, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 50–63, Dec. 2023. [CrossRef]
- E. S. Medina Carrasco and M. A. Coral Ygnacio, “Una revisión de procesos de implementación para sistemas de riego automatizado,” RECIBE, Rev. ELECTRÓNICA Comput. INFORMÁTICA, BIOMÉDICA Y ELECTRÓNICA, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. C1-1-C1-19, Dec. 2022. [CrossRef]
- A. Käppler et al., “Analysis of environmental microplastics by vibrational microspectroscopy: FTIR, Raman or both?,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem., vol. 408, no. 29, pp. 8377–8391, Nov. 2016. [CrossRef]
- S. Wei et al., “Characteristics and removal of microplastics in rural domestic wastewater treatment facilities of China,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 739, p. 139935, Oct. 2020. [CrossRef]







| Crop | Vegetative Cycle | Globa Coefficient (kg) | Sowing months | Exhibition type | Distance | Irrigation type | Commercial Value (Mexican pesos (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avocado | Perennial | 0.50 - 0.55 | Nov -May | Direct | 5 to 7 | drip | $38 - $79.90 |
| Sesame | 3 to 4 months | 0.8 | November | Direct | meters 18 to | drip | $70 - $100 |
| Alfafa | Between frosts 6 | 0.80 - 0.85 | Sep-Oct | Direct | 53 cm 15 -17.5 | drip | $50 - $70 |
| Cotton | to 7 months 5 | 0.60 - 0.65 | Oct-Nov | direct | cm 4 - 5 | sprinkling | $50 - $70 |
| Peanut | months | 0.60 - 0.65 | Feb-May | direct | cm 30 - 40 | drip | $90 - $100 |
| Cocoa | Perennial | 0.75 - 0.80 | oct-jan | direct | cm 3 meters | drip | $40 - $100 |
| cherry coffee | Perennial | 0.75 - 0.80 | Jun-Sep | shadow | 2 meters | drip | $10 - $15 |
| Sweet potato | 5 to 6 months | 0.6 | Jun-Oct | Direct | 15-20cm | drip | $50 - $65 |
| Sugar cane | Perennial | 0.75 - 0.90 | Jan-April | Direct | 1.40-1.60 meters | drip | $15 - $25 |
| Citrus | 7 to 8 months | 0.50 - 0.65 | Mar-Aug | Direct | 3-4 meters | drip | $20 - $70 |
| Chilies | 3 to 4 months | 0.6 | Sep – Nov | Direct | 1cm | drip | $30 - $80 |
| Asparagus | 6 to 7 months | 0.6 | March-Jun | Direct | 60-90cm | drip | $80 - $100 |
| Strawberry | Perennial | 0.45 - 0.60 | Feb-Aug | Semi-shade | 30cm | drip | $100 - $130 |
| Bean | 3 to 4 months | 0.60 - 0.70 | Nov- Feb | Semi-shade | 10cm | drip | $29 - $50 |
| Chickpea | 4 to 5 months | 0.60 - 0.70 | Sep-Dec | Direct | 30-40cm | drip | $30 - $50 |
| Sunflower | 4 months | 0.50 - 0.65 | March-Sept | Direct | 60-90cm | drip | $60 - $80 |
| Bean | 4 to 5 months | 0.60 - 0.70 | Mar-May and Jan | Direct | 20cm | drip | $100 - $130 |
| Vegetables | 2 to 4 months | 0.6 | March-Sept | Semi-shade | 20-30 cm | drip | $20 - $70 |
| Tomato | 4 months | 0.7 | Aug-Sep | Direct | .5 - 1 cm | drip | $20 - $50 |
| Lettuce and cabbage | 3 months | 0.60 - 0.70 | Jan-Dec | Semi-shade | 30 cm | drip | $15 - $25 |
| Lentil | 4 months | 0-60 - 0.70 | Dec-Jun | Direct | 40-50 cm 2 | drip | $40 - $60 |
| Corn | 4 months | 0.75 - 0.85 | Sep- Dec | Direct | to 3 cm | drip | $10 - $20 |
| Mango | perennial | 0.6 | Jun-Sept | direct | 45573 | drip | $20 - $42.50 |
| Melon | 3 to 4 months | 0.65 - 0.75 | Jan-Feb and Sep | sun | meters | drip | $30 - $45 |
| Dad | 3 to 5 months | .65 - .77 | March-June Jan- | Direct | 1-2 cm | drip | $30 - $45 |
| Papaya | perennial | .60 - .80 | Dec- Apr | Sun | 60-70 cm | drip | $24 - $45 |
| Banana | perennial | .80 - 1.00 | Dec- may | Sun | 45353 | drip | $20 - $30 |
| Beet/Beets | 6 months | .65 - .75 | Sep- Jun | Sun | 5-10 cm | cm drip | $20 - $40 |
| Watermelon | 3 to 4 months | 0.6 | Jan- Dec | Sun | 90cm | drip | $20 - $30 |
| Carrot | 2 to 4 months | 0.6 | April- Dec | Sun | 1- 2cm | drip | $13 - $20 |
| Cilantro | 2 months | 0.83 | Sep- Mar | Direct | 15cm | sprinkling | $100 - $150 |
| Onion | 6 months | 0.65 | Jun- May | Direct | 10-15cm | drip | $28 - $35 |
| Radish | 1 to 2 months | 0.65 | Jul | Semi-shade | 5cm | drip | $13 - $20 |
| Irrigation Type | Supply water | Need of water | % Saving water | % of increase production | Cost energetic | Type of crop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface irrigation |
Melga | Irregular | Abundant | scarse-null | 30% | High | Rice, Corn, Pastures, Vineyards, Cotton |
| Groove | Irregular | Moderate | scarse-null | No reportado | High | Sugar cane | |
| Pressurized irrigation | Drip irrigation-located | Continuous | Limited | 95-100% | 40%-85% | Moderate | Lime, Lemon, Tangerine, Oranges, Grapefruit, Grapefruit, Corn, Soybeans, Grasses, Banana, Sugar Cane, Cotton, Beans, Potato, Pumpkin, Melon, Peanut, Chile |
| Aspersion | Regular | Half | 80-85% | 25%- 35% | Medium | Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, Cotton, Peanuts, Potatoes, Sunflowers, Alfafa, Sorghum, Beet, Vegetables | |
| Micro-aspersión | Regular | High - medium | 46-82% | 27% | Medio | Nurseries, Frost protection, Garden irrigation, Horticulture, Fruit growing, Flowers, Greenhouses, Cocoa | |
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Crop: | Ejotero Bean |
| Variety | Phaseolus vulgaris |
| Distance between seeds | 30cm |
| Number of seeds per stump | 4 |
| Total number of plants | 42 |
| Total number of seeds sown | 126 |
| Depth | 4 cm |
| Germination days | 7 - 15 days |
| Vegetative development | 2 - 3 weeks |
| % germination | >91% |
| flowering | 1 - 2 weeks |
| Pod formation | 2 - 3 weeks |
| Seed/crop maturity | 50 - 70 days |
| Parameter | Wetland Plants | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hippeastrum hybridum Hort | Heliconia bihaí margarita | ||
| DQO | ND | ||
| IC | 947.13 ± 17.32 | * | |
| EC | 73.28 ± 2.30 | 89.21 ± 3.69 | |
| Removal (%) | 92.26% ± 0.25% | 90.58% ± 0.39% | |
| NT | ND | ||
| IC | 86.23 ± 4.43 | * | |
| EC | 7.23 ± 0.48 | 4.82 ± 0.36 | |
| Removal (%) | 91.37% ± 0.66% | 94.13% ± 0.50% | |
| NH4 | ND | ||
| IC | 36.64 ± 2.16 | * | |
| EC | 2.54 ± 0.17 | 2.99 ± 0.24 | |
| Removal (%) | 92.67% ± 0.57% | 91.38% ± 0.76% | |
| NO2-N | ND | ||
| IC | 183.62 ± 4.39 | * | |
| EC | 14.80 ± 0.83 | 10.15 ± 0.94 | |
| Removal (%) | 91.89% ± 0.47% | 94.46% ± 0.51% | |
| PT | ND | ||
| IC | 19.52 ± 0.78 | * | |
| EC | 1.84 ± 0.09 | 0.97 ± 0.05 | |
| Removal (%) | 90.39% ± 0.51% | 94.97% ± 0.25% | |
| PO₄³⁻ | ND | ||
| IC | 39.83 ± 1.48 | * | |
| EC | 2.20 ± 0.17 | 3.13 ± 0.20 | |
| Removal (%) | 94.30% ± 0.50% | 92.22% ± 0.44% | |
| TDS | ND | ||
| IC | 2.02 ± 0.06 | * | |
| EC | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | |
| Removal (%) | 90.34% ± 0.44% | 89.81% ± 0.40% | |
| pH | ND | ||
| IC | 8.08 ± 0.07 | * | |
| EC | 7.03 ± 0.05 | 6.97 ± 0.04 | |
| Removal (%) | 12.94% ± 0.68% | 13.63% ± 0.66% | |
| EC | ND | ||
| IC | 2455.31 ± 112.31 | * | |
| EC | 1113.92 ± 23.55 | 1117.00 ± 22.60 | |
| Removal (%) | 53.29% ± 1.81% | 53.11% ± 1.80% | |
| Phaseolus vulgaris | |
|---|---|
| Sowing | Oct 23, 23 |
| Outbreak date | Oct 27, 23 |
| Start of measurements | 30-oct-23 |
| Irrigation Type | Drip |
| Requirement/day | |
| Irrigate | 2 *day |
| Harvest date: | Jan 14, 24 |
| Total days | 84 days |
| Growing bed 1 (Treated water) |
Growing bed 2 (Water well) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Medium plant growth | 26 cm | 21 cm |
| Period with highest height | 45- 60 days | 45- 60 days |
| Harvest irrigated with water treated by Constructed Wetlands | harvest irrigated with Well Water | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Plants for stump | Weight (grams) (plant with root) | No. Poods | Beans Weight (grams) | No. | Plants for stump | Weight (grams) (plant with root) | No. Poods | Beans Weight (grams) |
| P1 | 4 | 357 | 62 | 55 | P1 | 3 | 269 | 46 | 55 |
| P2 | 3 | 245 | 42 | 39 | P2 | 2 | 100 | 21 | 30 |
| P3 | 3 | 232 | 34 | 32 | P3 | 2 | 183 | 32 | 41 |
| P4 | 4 | 353 | 60 | 48 | P4 | 3 | 230 | 34 | 43 |
| P5 | 4 | 351 | 56 | 46 | P5 | 4 | 357 | 64 | 60 |
| P6 | 4 | 357 | 63 | 52 | P6 | 4 | 275 | 51 | 59 |
| P7 | 3 | 234 | 36 | 21 | P7 | 3 | 242 | 38 | 47 |
| P8 | 3 | 234 | 34 | 30 | P8 | 2 | 122 | 19 | 28 |
| P9 | 3 | 232 | 30 | 28 | P9 | 3 | 105 | 18 | 17 |
| P10 | 4 | 332 | 49 | 40 | P10 | 3 | 240 | 34 | 24 |
| P11 | 3 | 242 | 38 | 36 | P11 | 2 | 55 | 7 | 11 |
| P12 | 3 | 249 | 42 | 39 | P12 | 3 | 228 | 30 | 36 |
| P13 | 5 | 369 | 68 | 60 | P13 | 4 | 178 | 28 | 30 |
| P14 | 4 | 330 | 46 | 39 | P14 | 4 | 232 | 30 | 36 |
| P15 | 4 | 351 | 56 | 45 | P15 | 3 | 205 | 29 | 22 |
| P16 | 3 | 240 | 36 | 34 | P16 | 3 | 150 | 26 | 26 |
| P17 | 3 | 232 | 30 | 29 | P17 | 5 | 281 | 39 | 48 |
| P18 | 3 | 236 | 34 | 32 | P18 | 4 | 170 | 35 | 17 |
| P19 | 3 | 220 | 28 | 25 | P19 | 3 | 146 | 28 | 30 |
| P20 | 3 | 234 | 30 | 28 | P20 | 3 | 122 | 23 | 30 |
| P21 | 2 | 100 | 21 | 30 | P21 | 2 | 98 | 20 | 28 |
| Σ | 895 | 788 | Σ | 652 | 720 | ||||
| Domestic Wastewater | ||
|---|---|---|
| No. Sample | Range | Polymer |
| M1 | 1633 | PU, EVA, PA, PET, PMMA |
| 1400 - 1480 | PP, PS, PET, PA | |
| M2 | 1634 | PU, EVA, PA, PET, PMMA |
| 1044 | PTFE | |
| M3 | 1634 | PU, EVA, PA, PET, PMMA |
| Domestic Wastewater Treated by Constructed Wetlands | ||
| M1 | 1633 | PU, EVA, PA, PET, PMMA |
| M2 | 1633 | PU, EVA, PA, PET, PMMA |
| M3 | 1633 | PU, EVA, PA, PET, PMMA |
| Well Water | ||
| M1 | 1634 | PU, EVA, PA, PET, PMMA |
| 1044 | PP, PS, PET, PA | |
| M2 | 1634 | EVA, Poliéster alifático |
| 1044 | PTFE | |
| M3 | 1634 | EVA, Poliéster alifático |
| 1044 | PTFE | |
| Abbreviation | Name | Usos |
|---|---|---|
| PE | Polyethylene | Bags, irrigation pipes, kitchen film, containers for detergents, baby bottles, toys, bases for disposable diapers, buckets, threads, cables. |
| PA | Polyamide (synthetic: Nylon) |
Toothbrush, wheels, guitar strings, medical implants, fishing line. Textile: tights, swimsuits, sportswear. Automotive: internal and external vehicle components, such as hoses, belts, liners. Electronics: Manufacturing of electronic components. Packaging: packaging |
| PC | Polycarbonate | Sheets, roof coverings, skylights, facade panels, greenhouses, safety acrylics, pool enclosures. |
| PMMA | Polymethylmethacrylate | Windows, doors, canopies, solar panels, television screens. Medicine: contact lenses, cement in orthopedic surgery, tooth manufacturing, dentures. Art: acrylic paintings, frames, guitars, pianos. |
| PTFE | Polytetrafluoroethylene | Kitchen utensils, aircraft industry such as seals and gaskets, medical industry such as catheters and sutures. |
| PP | Polypropylene | Automotive such as battery boxes, bumpers, household items such as food packaging, chairs, threads, containers and packaging, accessories, textile and rope manufacturing, carpets and rugs. |
| PET | Polyethylene Terephthalate | Bottles, textiles, adhesive tape, cosmetic jars, mesh fabrics for agriculture, in the automotive industry, windshield wipers, gear shells, engine covers. |
| PVC | Polyvinylchloride | Construction, electrical industry, agriculture, such as drinking water and drainage pipes, windows, doors, blinds, floors, walls, waterproofing sheets, electrical and telecommunications conduit, bottles and straws, garden furniture, handles, sockets, distribution boxes in the electrical industry. |
| EVA | Ethylene vinyl acetate | Designs and school work, footwear industry, packaging, toys. |
| PS | Polystyrene | Containers, plates, glasses, cutlery, trays, bathroom doors, thermal insulation foam, refrigerator shelves. |
| PU | Polyurethane | Clothing used in conjunction with Nylon and as a leather substitute, in construction used as sealant and insulation components, in packaging, and in medicine used in wound coverings, such as tapes and bandages. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).