The water samples collected during this study include surface water (mainly from tanks and rivers), shallow groundwater, and deep groundwater. Surface water sources, both tanks and rivers become dry during the dry season and some stagnated water pockets can be seen along the river and even in the larger tanks. However, water levels become full supply levels or flooding during the wet season. Shallow groundwater is buried in a depth of around 10m and is mainly stored in the weathered overburden. The depth of shallow dug wells in the study area are generally 3 to 10m and the water level fluctuation is around 1 to 4m during the dry and wet seasons. Deep groundwater in the study area is mainly through the 30 to 60 m deep fractures and fishers of the basement rock in the metamorphic region while 20 to 200m deep confined to semi-confined limestone aquifers in the sedimentary terrain.
4.1. Groundwater Chemistry
Summary of the hydrogeochemical data of CKDu endemic and non-endemic areas of Malwathu (MO) and CKDu control Malala Oya (ML) basins are shown in table 1.
The pH of the water in both shallow and deep groundwaters in the CKDu endemic, non-endemic and control areas during the wet and dry seasons are within the WHO and SLS maximum permissible limit of 6.5 to 8.5. Slightly alkaline condition is prominent in the groundwater in the surface waters of CKDu endemic area.
The TDS in groundwater is a direct indicator of to identify the rock-water interaction, mineral dissolution, and evaporation effect in the groundwater system (Indika et al., 2023). The average TDS content of all waters except for surface waters during both seasons exceeded the SLS desirable level of 500 mg/L. The surface water with very low TDS suggests that these waters may regularly mix with surface runoff or infiltrated rainwater (Balasooriya et al., 2021). Shallow groundwater has comparatively higher TDS than deep groundwater and sedimentary rock area than metamorphic rock area. According to the TDS classification, groundwater in the crystalline formation are of poor quality (900 to 1200 mg/L), and the sedimentary formation with unfavorable condition (Chabuk et al., 2021).Shallow groundwater with a high content of TDS may be due to the high rate of evaporation and/or mineral dissolution from the unsaturated zone. However, shallow and deep-water wells close to the coastal area with high TDS (>1000mg/L) may be due to the mixing of a small amount of saline water, sea spray, or dissolution of buried alluvial material in this area.
The hardness of water is caused mainly due to the presence of alkaline earth elements calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) together with carbonate, bicarbonate, sulfate, and chloride anions (Dissanayake & Weerasooriya, 1986) and it is the most important factors suggested for the etiology of CKDu. The total hardness of groundwater collected in both seasons in the CKDu endemic area is higher than in the CKDu non-endemic and control area. Also, total hardness in the dry season is comparatively higher than in the wet season. Based on the WHO guidelines, water can be classified into four categories according to their hardness level as follows: soft water at CaCO3 hardness < 60 mg/L, moderately hard water at 60-120 mg/L, hard water at 120-180 mg/L, andvery hard water at > 180 mg /L. Almost all the collected water from the dry season with the hardness exceeded the WHO desirable level of 300 mg/L . However, the hardness of all surface and groundwater samples is below the value of 300 mg/L in the wet season with few exceptions. Shallow groundwater is always subjected to a higher rate of evaporation and intensified rock weathering under the tropical climatic conditions, added excess amount of Ca2+ and Mg 2+ into the groundwater system which leads the higher total hardness in the CKDu endemic area. Deep groundwater with more or less similar hardness and TDS values in both seasons indicate that these waters are not affected by immediate recharge and it controlled only by the dissolution of the aquifer matrix.
Among the studied geochemical parameters, fluoride is one of the major geogenic constituents in drinking water and excessive intake can cause serious health issues (Dissanayake & Chandrajith, 2017). Nearly 60% of absorbed total fluoride per day is filtered and excreted via urine, hence kidneys are one of the target organs for fluoride accumulation. Long-term fluoride exposure can enhance renal damage and it has been suggested as a possible causative factor for the etiology of CKDu (Balasooriya et al., 2021). Rocks are the main source of groundwater fluoride and it leached from common rock-forming minerals such as apatite, mica, sphene, fluorite, hornblende, amphibole, and pyroxene with high F- content (Ranasinghe et al., 2019; R et al., 2011). F- concentration of deep groundwater taken in both CKDu endemic and control areas are from underlying metamorphic rocks such as biotite gneiss, granites, and charnockitic gneiss. However, carbonate rocks produce less amount of fluoride and its concentration is quite low in the sedimentary formation (< 0.5 mg/L).
Results of the present study show that fluoride content of the shallow and deep groundwater in the CKDu endemic area varied from 0.3 to 1.6 mg/L and 0.4 to 1.3 mg/L in the dry season and 0.3 to 2.2 mg/L and 0.2 to 2.7 mg/L in the wet season respectively. The fluoride content of the shallow and deep groundwater of the control area varied from < 0.2 to 2.1 mg/L <0.2 to 5.9 mg/L in the dry season and 0.2 to 5.8 mg/L and 1.5 to 7.8 mg/L in the wet season respectively. More than 80% of the samples collected during both seasons of the CKDu endemic area exceeded the maximum permissible limit (> 0.5 mg/L) established by WHO. Interestingly, 20% and more than 75% of the water samples collected in the control areas exceeded that limit during the dry and wet seasons respectively.
The results imply that the CKDu endemic area with higher groundwater fluoride than the non-endemic and control area and the wet season shows elevated levels than in the dry seasons. This difference in the F- concentration of groundwater may be due to the presence of various mineral components in the aquifer rocks and their F- dissolution capability. In addition to that, long residence time leaves deep groundwater to interact with F--bearing minerals and lead to the accumulation of dissolved F-.
Furthermore, evaporation under dry climatic conditions causes the enrichment of groundwater F- (Balasooriya et al., 2021; Chandrajith et al., 2020; R et al., 2011). Usually, the components in shallow groundwater are likely to be diluted due to mixing with infiltrated rainwater in the wet season while concentrated due to the high evaporation in the dry season. However, F- content in deep groundwater in the CKDu endemic area and both shallow and deep groundwater in the control area showed an opposite phenomenon. This implies the high fluoride concentration in the wet season may not controlled by the individual factor. According to (Saxena & Ahmed, 2001; Su et al., 2013), chemical properties of groundwater such as weakly alkaline pH condition (7.2 to 8.2), moderate TDS, and dominant ions of HCO3- and Na+ are the favorable conditions for the enhancement of groundwater F-. These may suggest that the geochemical cycling of F- in groundwater could be highly influenced by the combined effect of the underground geology, hydrodynamic, and geochemical nature of the aquifer system. The fluoride geochemistry and its fate in groundwater in the CKDu endemic and control area are further discussed in section 3.5.
Many previous studies identified the presence of Calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), and sodium (Na+) in drinking water are important parameter, and the dominancy of these ions in the water control the onset of CKDu (Balasooriya et al., 2021; Dharma-wardana, 2018; Liyanage et al., 2022). However, the Mg2+ concentration of the both shallow and deep groundwater in both CKDu endemic and non-endemic areas and deep groundwater in the control area exceeded the Maximum Allowable Limit (MAL) of Mg2+ (30 mg/L). None of the water samples collected during the dry season exceeded the limit of Ca2+ while two samples from the CKDu endemic area and one sample from the control area collected after the wet season exceeded the MAL of Ca2+ (100 mg/L).
Table 1.
Summary of the hydro geochemical data of water samples in the Malwathu and Malala Oya basins.
Table 1.
Summary of the hydro geochemical data of water samples in the Malwathu and Malala Oya basins.
Water Type |
pH |
TDS |
TA |
TH |
Na+
|
Ca2+
|
Mg2+
|
SO42-
|
Cl-
|
NO3-
|
F-
|
|
(mg/L) |
(mg/L as CaCO3) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Dry |
Wet |
Malwathu Oya Basin (CKDu endemic area) |
Surface Water
|
Min |
7.4 |
7.4 |
304 |
200 |
176 |
136 |
200 |
163 |
68 |
35.4 |
28. |
15.5 |
26.5 |
9.7 |
2.5 |
0 |
94.5 |
29.7 |
<0.008 |
0.1 |
0.26 |
0.3 |
Max |
9.1 |
8.9 |
427 |
501 |
200 |
321 |
200 |
264 |
103 |
99 |
35 |
52.8 |
30.6 |
30.3 |
7.5 |
18 |
163 |
95.7 |
3.6 |
0.6 |
0.34 |
1.2 |
Avg |
8.3 |
8 |
366 |
338 |
188 |
209 |
200 |
209 |
85 |
63.4 |
31.7 |
28.6 |
28.6 |
18.5 |
5 |
7.4 |
129 |
57.3 |
1.8 |
0.3 |
0.30 |
0.7 |
Crystalline Terrain |
Shallow GW
|
Min |
7 |
6.8 |
366 |
215 |
160 |
189 |
208 |
154 |
36.4 |
29.6 |
45.9 |
38.5 |
37.6 |
7.7 |
11.8 |
2 |
43.4 |
23.9 |
<0.008 |
0.2 |
0.35 |
0.3 |
Max |
7.7 |
8.3 |
1032 |
1394 |
448 |
537 |
820 |
950 |
148 |
192 |
128 |
427 |
114 |
107 |
52.3 |
142 |
390 |
728 |
15.4 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
Avg |
7.4 |
7.7 |
744 |
792 |
301 |
414 |
553 |
453 |
87.5 |
88.9 |
68.4 |
135 |
72.6 |
50.4 |
29.9 |
57.3 |
217 |
226 |
4.5 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Deep GW
|
Min |
6.6 |
6.7 |
102 |
107 |
104 |
88.2 |
68 |
70.4 |
28.5 |
21.8 |
12.7 |
0.4 |
5.4 |
3.4 |
7.8 |
6 |
7.2 |
3.9 |
<0.008 |
<0.008 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
Max |
7.4 |
8.5 |
663 |
729 |
456 |
473 |
616 |
295 |
157 |
167 |
58 |
88.8 |
67 |
50.2 |
36.6 |
49 |
152 |
153 |
27.6 |
8.5 |
1.3 |
2.7 |
Avg |
7 |
7.5 |
423 |
425 |
266 |
322 |
305 |
201 |
79 |
72.6 |
45 |
35.8 |
36 |
21.4 |
21.3 |
25.8 |
77 |
60 |
5.5 |
1.8 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Sedimentary Terrain (CKDu non-endemic area) |
Shallow GW
|
Min |
7.7 |
7.7 |
904 |
912 |
288 |
393 |
380 |
44 |
239 |
340 |
57.8 |
7.2 |
48.5 |
3.6 |
55 |
62 |
378 |
445 |
<0.008 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
Max |
8.1 |
8.6 |
2570 |
1289 |
520 |
453 |
420 |
290 |
987 |
590 |
71 |
94.4 |
75 |
23.6 |
220 |
136 |
1246 |
484 |
<0.008 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
1.7 |
Avg |
7.9 |
8.1 |
1737 |
1102 |
404 |
423 |
400 |
167 |
613 |
465 |
64.4 |
50.8 |
61.8 |
13.6 |
138 |
99 |
812 |
465 |
- |
1.1 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
Deep GW
|
Min |
7.3 |
7.6 |
531 |
530 |
232 |
305 |
204 |
89.2 |
117 |
114 |
52.9 |
49.6 |
34.4 |
15.6 |
25.9 |
29 |
171 |
129 |
<0.008 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
Max |
7.5 |
7.7 |
1290 |
1294 |
360 |
373 |
336 |
317 |
425 |
360 |
78.8 |
70.8 |
51.9 |
35.4 |
89.4 |
132 |
578 |
380 |
<0.008 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
Avg |
7.4 |
7.7 |
925 |
928 |
296 |
329 |
276 |
225 |
264 |
237 |
66 |
60.9 |
43.6 |
25.3 |
56.2 |
76.7 |
376 |
275 |
- |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
Malala Oya Basin (CKDu control area) |
Surface Water |
Min |
7.2 |
6.95 |
177 |
130 |
74 |
3.36 |
112 |
52 |
25 |
24 |
1.0 |
18 |
0.4 |
10 |
<0.2 |
7 |
<0.2 |
16 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
0.4 |
Max |
8.2 |
9.19 |
952 |
1810 |
195 |
1831 |
716 |
668 |
305 |
303 |
52.7 |
119 |
44.7 |
102 |
125.1 |
151 |
375 |
705 |
506.5 |
27.6 |
0.6 |
3.1 |
Avg |
7.7 |
7.87 |
470 |
628 |
126 |
850 |
250 |
261 |
139 |
127 |
28.3 |
38 |
23.2 |
31 |
44.7 |
44 |
138 |
177 |
106.6 |
4.8 |
0.1 |
1.1 |
Shallow GW
|
Min |
6.7 |
7.09 |
257 |
143 |
90 |
3.19 |
136 |
132 |
26 |
22 |
17.5 |
14 |
7.0 |
4 |
25.9 |
8 |
27.4 |
20 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
0.2 |
Max |
7.8 |
8.38 |
2310 |
2530 |
527 |
1270 |
872 |
980 |
968 |
970 |
69.2 |
129 |
94.8 |
117 |
312.4 |
450 |
1008 |
992 |
6.3 |
26.4 |
2.1 |
5.8 |
Avg |
7.6 |
7.84 |
786 |
851 |
210 |
625 |
381 |
338 |
237 |
304 |
37.2 |
50 |
33.8 |
48 |
112.2 |
132 |
262.9 |
330 |
2.0 |
8.6 |
0.4 |
2.3 |
Deep GW
|
Min |
6.8 |
7.14 |
655 |
493 |
187 |
435 |
268 |
220 |
100 |
149 |
12.1 |
10 |
35.9 |
29 |
34.1 |
41 |
137.2 |
32 |
<0.2 |
1.7 |
<0.2 |
1.5 |
Max |
7.9 |
7.64 |
1354 |
1166 |
357 |
1000 |
728 |
748 |
324 |
350 |
84.8 |
71 |
76.3 |
74 |
169 |
155 |
497 |
363 |
15.7 |
138.7 |
5.9 |
7.8 |
Avg |
7.3 |
7.39 |
901 |
863 |
252 |
620 |
443 |
513 |
187 |
260 |
48.0 |
36 |
53.4 |
50 |
101.6 |
83 |
230 |
205 |
5.9 |
18.4 |
1.5 |
3.7 |
Maximum Permissible Limits |
SLS |
6.5-8.5 |
500 |
200 |
250 |
200 |
100 |
30 |
250 |
250 |
50 |
1.0 |
WHO |
6.5-8.5 |
600 |
500 |
300 |
200 |
100 |
30 |
250 |
250 |
50 |
1.5 |
4.2. TA, Total Alkalinity; TDS, Total Dissolved Solids; TH, Total Hardness
Na+ concentration of the groundwater collected from the CKDu control area exceeded the MAL of Na+ (200 mg/L) in both seasons. The ratio between Ca2+ and Mg2+ can be applied to identify their source as well as Na+/Ca2+ ratio can be used to compare their activities(Dissanayake & Chandrajith, 2017; Kumar & Singh, 2015; Liyanage et al., 2022). The calculated Na/Ca ratio of groundwater collected in the dry season varied from 0.5 to 3.1 in the CKDu endemic area and 0.4 to 44.1 in the control area. However, the similar ratio in the wet season varied from 0.4 to5.9 in the CKDu endemic area while 0.5 to 59.2 in the control area.
Nitrate is one of the major constituents in freshwater and their concentration is mostly controlled by anthropogenic factors rather than natural factors (Vaheesar, n.d.). Almost all the water samples collected from the CKDu endemic area during both seasons had lower nitrate levels compared to the drinking water quality standards (50 mg/L) given by WHO. NO3- concentration of surface and groundwater ranged from 0.1 to 3.6 mg/L and 0.1 to 27.6 mg/L in the dry season while 0.1 to 0.6 mg/L and 0.2 to 8.5 mg/L in the wet season respectively. Undetectable amount of NO3- presence in the all water types of the CKDu non-endemic area. However, three surface water samples collected from the CKDu control area in both seasons with unacceptable levels of nitrate (up to 120 mg/L) may probably be due to its addition from intense agricultural activities.
Potential nephrotoxic effects of environmental exposure to heavy metals and metalloids, mainly As, Cd, Pb, and Cr have been identified as a causative factor for CKDu (Jayasumana et al., 2014; Kulathunga et al., 2019; Wimalawansa, 2015). These metals in groundwater may be derived from rock weathering or by the use of agrochemicals (Jayasumana et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2021). Measured heavy metal concentration except for As of the water from all three area well below the MALs. However, the average Arsenic (As) concentration of surface water, shallow and deep groundwater in the control area are exceeded the standard limits of 10 µg/L and reported as 42.7 mg/L, 28.7 mg/L, and 17.1 mg/L respectively. These high As, content may be derived from the heavily used chemical fertilizers of that area.
All measured surface water parameters in both CKDu endemic, non-endemic and control areas are well below their MALs.
Considering the combined ionic ratios, the excess F
- and Mg
2+ions are presence in the groundwater samples in the CKDu endemic area in the Malwathu Oya basin, but F
- is relatively low in the lower part of the basin where sedimentary formation with non-prevalence of CKDu. In the control area there are three different types of waters showing low F
- and low Mg
2+, high F
- and low Mg
2+ or low F
- with high Mg
2+ (
Figure 2). Chandrajith et al., 2017 explained either low F
- with high Mg
2+ or high Mg
2+ with low F
- has an inhibitory effect on CKDu. According to the generated results, combined effect of high F
- and high Mg
2+ may be the possible causative factor for the CKDu.
To consider the spatiotemporal variation of measured water quality parameters exceeded the MAL in CKDu endemic, non-endemic and control areas TDS, and Na+ concentrations are higher in the CKDu non-endemic and control areas while total hardness, F- and Mg2+ concentrations are higher in the CKDu endemic area. The concentration of the water quality parameters in the CKDu endemic area is higher in the dry season than wet season while shallow groundwater is higher than deep groundwater. However, the same ion concentrations in the control area are higher in the wet season than dry season while deep groundwater than shallow groundwater. Ionic concentration of the shallow groundwater in the both basins are increases towards downstream. However, there is no significant spatial variation can be identified in the deep groundwater except for F- in the control area. High F- spot during the dry season probably from geogenic origin.
4.3. Hydrogeochemical Evolution of Groundwater
Distinct geological, hydrological and climatic conditions must play an important role in the geochemistry of CKDu causative factors (Chandrajith et al., 2020). Depending on the geological, hydrological, and climatological conditions, the groundwater type of the area may differ.
The Piper trilinear diagrams are widely used for the geochemical classification of groundwater (
Figure 03). Groundwater in the CKDu endemic area mostly consists of Ca
2+, Mg
2+, and HCO
3- ions, and the Ca-HCO
3 type is predominant. Chemical results revealed that Mg is dominant in the dry season while Ca is dominant in the wet season of the shallow groundwater. That may be due to the dissolution of carbonate and silicate minerals in the wet season and the reduction of Ca ions by the ion exchange process during the dry season.
In CKDu non-endemic and control region has predominantly Na-Cl, Ca-Mg-Cl, and Ca-Na-HCO3 together with Na+, K+, and Ca2+ as dominant cation and HCO3- and Cl- as dominant anions. Hydrochemical facies of Na-Cl may have a link to seawater mixing and/or cation exchange (Priyadarshanee et al., 2022). Ca-Mg-Cl and Ca-Na-HCO3 water types in the CKDu control area suggest a significant contribution to the weathering of mica, amphibolite, and pyroxene in the high-grade metamorphic rocks in the evolution of groundwater type in that basin area.
Gibb’s plot (Gibbs, 1970) is widely used to describe the source of dissolved chemical constituents in groundwater contributing from rock-weathering, evaporation-crystallization, and atmospheric precipitation. Evaporation-dominant waters generally occur in arid (high temperature) or coastal zones and this is due to the evaporation-fractional crystallization process causing rich, intermediate salinity to Na-rich, high salinity waters (Gibbs, 1970; Krishna kumar et al., 2015). Groundwater collected in both seasons of the CKDu endemic, non-endemic as well as the control area fall in the transition zone of rock weathering dominance and evaporation concentration fields indicating the influence of different degree of water-rock interaction and evaporation concentration (
Figure 04). However, the contribution rate of evaporation concentration to shallow groundwater is higher than that of deep groundwater in the CKDu endemic area. Rock-dominance component is higher in the deep groundwater samples and a lower Na
+/(Na
++Ca
2+) ratio specifies the dominance of carbonate minerals in the CKDu endemic area whereas a higher value represents the dominance of silicate minerals/sea water mixing in the non-endemic and control area.
Na
+, Ca
2+, Mg
2+, Cl
-, and HCO
3- are the major ions in the study area and are mainly influenced by rock weathering, evaporation crystallization and cation exchange. The relationships between major ions are generally used to identify the evolution of groundwater and its mixing mechanisms (Raja et al., 2021; Rubasinghe et al., 2015; Senarathne et al., 2019). Measured ion content shows that a significantly higher linear relationship among each other in the dry season because of the higher rock-water interaction in the dry season (
Figure 5). On the other hand, the linearity of the relationship was scattered in the wet season because of the dilution effect. The molar ratio of Na
+/Cl
- is widely used to evaluate silicate weathering, seawater intrusion, halite dissolution, and ion exchange processes (Rubasinghe et al., 2015). Groundwater samples collected from the non-endemic sedimentary formation of the MO area and two samples collected in the control area near the coast were scattered along a 1:1 line of Na
+/Cl
- indicating that this groundwater chemistry is based on seawater mixing (
Figure 5a). The Na
+/Cl
- ratio greater than 1 represents silicate mineral weathering (Senarathne et al., 2019) which is common in the CKDu control area. Similarly, this ratio greater than 1.5 indicates the additional source contributing to the dissolved Na
+, which is potentially due to the weathering of Na-bearing silicates, a dissolution of Na-bearing evaporites, and cation exchange between Ca
2+ and Mg
2+ in groundwater with Na
+ on the aquifer matrix (Lyu et al., 2019). This phenomenon is common in the wet season of the control area.
On the other hand, as shown in
Figure 5b & c water samples collected from the CKDu endemic and non-endemic areas are located on the 1:1 line of (Ca
2++ Mg
2+) vs HCO
3- (meq/L) and Ca
2+/Mg
2+ ratio between 1 and 2 indicates the calcite dissolution process (Indika et al., 2023; Senarathne et al., 2019). Evaluation of the groundwater chemistry from the carbonate dissolution and silicate mineral weathering process can also be reconfirmed by the end-member diagrams (
Figure 5d & e). However, Ca
2+, Mg
2+, and HCO
3- in the control area is mainly affected by silicate weathering and evaporite dissolution.
Evolution process of Ca2+, Mg2+, and HCO3- in the CKDu endemic andthe control are as shown below;
Dissolution of pyroxenes:
Dissolution of amphiboles;
Dissolution of calcite and dolomites:
Cation exchange mainly occurs at the interface of groundwater and aquifer matrix, during which Ca
2+ and Mg
2+ in groundwater are adsorbed into aquifer material and Na
+ and K
+ are desorbed into groundwater. Groundwater containing HCO
3- and SO
42- are from carbonate mineral dissolution and silicate weathering process, hence cation exchange is calculated by subtracting the equivalent concentration of HCO
3- and SO
42- from Ca
2+and Mg
2+((Ca
2+ + Mg
2+) - (HCO
3-+SO
42-)). Na
+ and K
+ come from the desorption and it can be calculated by subtracting an equivalent concentration of Cl
- from Na
+ + K
+ ((Na
+ + K
+) - Cl
-) (Wei et al., 2016). Almost all groundwater samples collected from both seasons were plotted near the line with a slope of -1, indicating the presence of alternating cation adsorption in both CKDu endemic and control areas (Figure f). Water samples collected in the CKDu endemic area during both seasons were plotted around a 1:1 line in the fourth quadrant of the coordinates, suggesting that alternate cation adsorption exists, mainly in the form of Ca
2+ release and Na
+ adsorption (Hu et al., 2023). However, the regression line between ((Ca
2+ + Mg
2+) - (HCO
3-+SO
42-)) and ((Na
+ + K
+) - Cl
-) in samples collected during the dry season had a slope of -1.1 which is slightly different from the wet season with the value of -0.8. In addition, the median value of ((Na
+ + K
+) - Cl
-) in samples collected from the dry season (1.05) is slightly higher than that of the wet season (1.02), meaning that the Ca
2+ release into the groundwater during the wet season is higher than the dry season of CKDu endemic area (Area A: reverse ion exchange).
During this process, clay minerals absorb Na+ from the water, and releasing Ca2+ or Mg2+ into the water may cause to increase in the hardness and Ca2+ or Mg2+ in water.
In contrast, samples collected from the wet season of the CKDu non-endemic and control areas are moving towards the first quadrant of the coordinates (median value changing from dry to wet season are 1.90 to 5.21 respectively), suggesting that the ion exchange happening in this groundwater system below (Area B).
During this process, the absorption of Ca2+/Mg2+ in clay water and release of Na+ into the groundwater happens and it causes to decrease of Mg2+ and/or Ca2+ in the water body.
All the findings mean that cation exchange in the CKDu control area is more evident than in the CKDu endemic area.
Moisture origin of different monsoonal patterns was identified by previous research (E. A. N. V. Edirisinghe, Pitawala, et al., 2017; Jayasena et al., 2008) and they proposed that the degree of isotopic depletion in rainwater across the island depends on the altitude, distance, and rain amount. Previously identified local meteoric water line (LMWL) of Dry Zone North East Valley area [δ2H=7.7δ18O + 11.8‰ (r2= 0.96)], evaporation line (EL) of North Central Dry Zone (δ2H=5.7δ18O -3.6‰) (E. A. N. V. Edirisinghe, Pitawala, et al., 2017) and LMWL of Hambanthota area [δ2H=8.0 δ18O + 12.8 ‰ (r2= 0.96)] (Senarathne et al., 2019) provide the basis for interpretation of isotopic data in the MO and ML basin areas.
The D-excess provides indication of local environmental conditions such as the degree of moisture recycling, amount of sub-cloud evaporation occurring during rainout, distinct air mass sources, and temperature of condensation (Bershaw et al., 2020).
Minimum and maximum δ
18O, δ
2H, and d-excess values of collected water sources of the MO and ML in both wet and dry seasons are presented in
Table 2. The relationship between δ
18O and δ
2H is graphically illustrated in
Figure 6 a, b & d, e. Also, the relationship of deuterium excess and TDS are represented in
Figure 6 c & f.
(a) Recharge source of Malwathu Oya (MO)
The δ
18O and δ
2H isotope value of surface water, shallow, and deep groundwater in the MO shows significant differences (
Figure 6(a)). The δ
18O and δ
2H of surface water of the dry season in the MO are enriched than the isotopic values of seawater indicating strong evaporation. However, surface waters and shallow groundwater after the wet season (
Figure 6(a) &(d)) shows similar depleted isotopic signature implying that the groundwater in the regolith area may interconnected with adjacent surface water bodies and fully saturated due to the heavy rainfall. In contrast, deep groundwater has no immediate recharge effect after the rainy season.
Almost all the water samples collected during the dry season lie on the evaporation lines of North-Central Dry Zone [
Figure 6(a)], but deep groundwater close to LMWL indicating that these waters are mainly recharged from monsoon rain and slightly mixed with evaporated water. The basin area receives rainfall from the North East monsoon and 2
nd Inter monsoon, and the long-term average rain index of the basin with δ
18O and δ
2H values of -6.7‰ and -40.7‰ (E. A. N. V. Edirisinghe, Pitawala, et al., 2017). The δ
18O confluence point (EM 2) of LMWL and evaporation line is -7.7 ‰ showing a more depleted isotopic signature than the rain index of the MO basin area would probably be due to higher elevation recharge condition.
The identified δ18O depletion in the rain per 100 m elevation is 0.6±0.2‰ (E. A. N. V. Edirisinghe, Pitawala, et al., 2017), considering the isotopic values and altitude effect, it is suggested that the deep groundwater in this basin is recharged from an altitude of 100 to 200 m amsl (Priyadarshanee et al., 2022).
Both shallow and deep groundwater in the sedimentary limestone area (CKDu non-endemic) have enriched isotopic signatures than the CKDu endemic area. These water samples are aligned in between the LMWL and evaporation line as well as pointing to the seawater indicating that these waters are not only affected by evaporation but also mixing with seawater.
The slope of the evaporation line varies with the evaporation condition and is usually less than 8 in the groundwater that are originating from atmospheric precipitation and affected by the evaporation. It is 4 to 6 in open water bodies and can reach 2 to 3 during soil evaporation. The slope of the evaporation line in CKDu endemic area is 5.7 and it indicates that the groundwater in this study area may be recharged by the already evaporated surface water or shallow groundwater may be directly affected by evaporation. Hence, the isotopic composition of recharged groundwater in the 100 m (EM-2: δ18O and δ2H are -7.7‰ and -47.5‰) and average isotopic signature of the surface water (EM-1: δ18O and δ2H are 1.7‰ and 8.0‰) were considered as the end-members to calculate the mixed surface water proportion during the dry season of the study area.
It implies that the evaporated surface water proportion of the deep and shallow groundwaters are between 19 to 33% and 23 to 48% respectively. Also, the proportion of mixed sea water in the CKDu non-endemic sedimentary formation was calculated using the confluence point of the groundwater regression line into the evaporation line (EM-3: δ18O and δ2H are -2.8‰ and -19.2‰) and isotopic signature of seawater (EM-4: δ18O and δ2H are -0.4‰ and 2.1‰). The calculated mixed seawater proportion varies between 23 to 39%.
The relationship of D-excess with TDS (
Figure 6 (c) & (f)) indicates that the mineral dissolution mostly contributes to the salinity of deep groundwater in the CKDu endemic area. However, surface water is affected by evapo-concentration and seawater mixing is prominent in the CKDu non-endemic area.
(b) Recharge source of Malala Oya (ML)
The δ
18O and δ
2H isotope value of surface water, shallow and deep groundwater in the CKDu control area shows significant differences (
Figure 6(b) & (e)) during both seasons. All the water in the CKDu control area are plotted away from the LMWLof Hambanthota implies that all these waters are affected by evaporation of varying degrees. Making of poorly interconnected surface water-groundwater network due to the depleted groundwater levels during the dry seasonmay be the possible reason for this isotopic separation. After the wet season, similar isotopic signatures can be seen in the shallow groundwater and surface water because they may interconnect and saturated with heavy rainfall.
Groundwater collected during the dry period of the CKDu control area was plotted on the regression line (EL 2) denoted by δ
2H=6.2 δ
18O -2.0‰ (r
2= 0.96) (
Figure 6(b)). However, surface water appears to have a different origin and the isotopic composition of surface water represents the evaporation line (EL 1) of δ
2H= 3.3 δ
18O -1.0‰. The δ
18O and δ
2H value of the confluence point of EL 1 into the LMWL is -2.9‰ and -10.7‰ represents the rain index of Southwestern (SW) monsoon (E. A. N. V. Edirisinghe, Pitawala, et al., 2017) and it suggests that the surface waters are recharged only from SW monsoonal rain. However, δ
18O and δ
2H values of the confluence point of EL 2 into the LMWL (EM 6: δ
18O and δ
2H are -8.2‰ and -52.8‰) show a more depleted isotopic signature than the local rain index of the basin area. This can suggest that the shallow and deep groundwaters have recharge origin from the adjacent mountainous area. The enriched and evaporated isotopic composition of shallow and deep groundwater composition could have been attributed to mixing with already evaporated surface water.
Mixing the proportion of evaporated surface water into the groundwater system is calculated using end-members of EM-5 and EM-6. The mixing proportion of evaporated surface water in deep groundwater varies from 37 to 69% and in shallow groundwater from 53 to 100%. Three shallow groundwater wells in this basin area are fully recharged from the evaporated surface waters.
Deep groundwater collected after the rainy season aligned along the evaporation line but close to the LMWL indicating that these waters are mainly recharged from monsoon rain. The deviation of shallow groundwater and surface water from the LMWL indicates intensive evaporation under prevailing dry conditions even after the rainy season (
Figure 6(e)). However, the evaporation effect is lesser compared to the dry season.
The relationship of D-excess with TDS (Figure 76c) & (f)) confirms that both mineral dissolution and evapo-concentration partially contribute to the salinity of groundwater during the dry season. However, surface water is only affected by the evapo-concentration, and mixing proportion is different from each other. After the wet season, the salinity of the deep groundwater is controlled only by mineral dissolution.
4.5. Correlation between Groundwater Fluoride, Hardness, TDS and Occurrence of CKDu
Spatiotemporal variation of water quality parameters exceeded the MALs of the CKDu endemic and control areas are described in section 3.1. However, their individual impact is cannot correlate with the CKDu even with the higher concentrations. Therefore, correlation coefficient matrix analysis was performed to identify the combined effect of water quality parameters with CKDu (
Figure 7a, b, c, & d).
The TDS in the water collected from both seasons of the CKDu endemic area and the wet season of the control area shows a strong positive correlation with Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, and Cl-, SO42- which indicate that TDS may derived from weathering and/or dissolution of aquifer material from the same source (Hu et al., 2023). The TDS and Ca2+ are non-correlated in the dry season with a strong positive correlation during the wet season which reflects that its mineralization was mainly caused by Ca2+ in the control area (Hu et al., 2023).
The correlation of Mg2+ and total hardness (TH) is higher than the correlation of other cations with TH implying that TH is more influenced by Mg2+ ions (Egbueri, 2019). Mg hardness is prominent in the dry season while Ca hardness is prominent in the wet season. In contrast, Ca hardness is prominent in the dry season of the control area. The more or less similar correlation coefficient of hardness with Ca and Mg (0.96) in the wet season indicates their equal contribution to the formation of total hardness in the control area.
The correlation between F
- with other chemical components can used to further understand the source of groundwater F
- (Liu et al., 2021; Narsimha Adimalla, 2020). There was a negative correlation between groundwater fluoride and Ca
2+ in the CKDu endemic area during the both seasons and the control area during the dry season, with r = -0.30, r = -0.09, and r = -0.50 respectively. As groundwater Ca
2+ increases from dry to wet season in the CKDu endemic area, the reaction shown in Eq.7 will proceed, thereby decreasing the content of F
- in groundwater due to the formation of CaF
2.
pH is an important factor that affects the desorption of groundwater F
- (Saxena & Ahmed, 2001) and a high concentration of HCO
3- will result in an alkaline groundwater environment (Liu et al., 2021). There is a positive correlation between groundwater F
- with pH and HCO
3- in the CKDu endemic area indicating that an alkaline environment is more conducive to fluoride enrichment. As HCO
3- is the main groundwater anion in the CKDu endemic area (Chandrajith, Dissanayake, et al., 2011; T. Cooray et al., 2019; Hettithanthri et al., 2021), with alkaline groundwater may lead to desorption of F
- as in eq.8.
In contrast, F- desorption is unfavorable in the CKDu control area because, there was a non-correlation between groundwater F- with pH and a weak positive correlation between F- with HCO3. However, F- concentration in the control area is considerably high, especially during the wet season. Also, this study has shown there is a strong positive correlation between F- with Na+ (r = 0.90). The main sources of Na+ are the weathering of sodium silicates, the dissolution of evaporites as well as cation exchange process.
However, the weathering of silicates and dissolution of evaporites are not directly related to groundwater fluoride (Liu et al., 2021), hence, the positive correlation between F- and Na+ may be due to cation exchange and it encouraged the CaF2 dissolution. Thus, the F- concentration increases where Ca2+ ions have dropped.
High concentrations of major ions present in the water contribute to the TDS and certain concentrations of these ions can activate the Hofmeister series effects leading to kidney damage in humans (Dharma-wardana, 2018; Hettithanthri et al., 2021). The results from the present study showed a direct correlation of TDS with other major ions of drinking water that can be used to identify their increasing and decreasing toxicity in the human body. Also, ionic ratios of F- with Mg2+, Ca2+, and Na+ and their impact on the biological mechanism leading to the disease may provide evidence as to its actual cause (Dissanayake & Chandrajith, 2017). The present study identified a positive correlation between F- with pH, Mg2+, and HCO3- in the CKDu endemic area while F- with Na+ in the control area. In addition to that, the calculated Na/Ca ratio in the endemic and control area is different and it has been identified as a promising factor to indicate major geochemical dissimilarities. The Na/Ca ratio is strongly related to the F- concentration and in the CKDu endemic area, the lower Na/Ca ratio could be due to either the lower Na+ activity or high Ca2+ activity. Ca2+ activity is more prominent compared to the Na+ activity in the CKDu region and F- showed more affinity towards Ca2+ (Dissanayake & Chandrajith, 2017; Liyanage et al., 2022).
Several studies conducted by previous authors highlighted the relationship between F- and TH with CKDu (Balasooriya et al., 2021; Wickramarathna et al., 2017). Even with the high TH in both CKDu and the control area, this study showed the TH in the CKDu area induced by a higher content of Mg2+ ion and Mg hardness could be a causative factor for CKDu. Consideration of the Hofmeister-type action of anions (Dharma-wardana, 2018) showed that the pairing of F- and Mg2+ in groundwater is expected to form more nephrotoxic MgF2 complexes that lead to the etiology of CKDu.
In contrast, the formation of NaF by complexation of F- with Na+ leads to decreased F- toxicity in the human body (Rajapakse et al., 2016). The control area with a higher Na/Ca ratio due to the increase of Na+ concentration during the ion exchange process leads to a reduction of toxicity. Furthermore, high evaporation rates due to prevailing high temperatures in the control area may further concentrate ions in the groundwater system.