Submitted:
10 May 2024
Posted:
12 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Background
2. Methodology
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Study Design, Study Population
2.3. Data Collection Method
2.3.1. Quantitative Data Collection
2.3.2. Qualitative Data Collection
2.4. Data Management and Analysis
2.4.1. Quantitative Data Management and Analysis
2.4.2. Qualitative Data Management and Analysis
2.5. Ethical Consideration
3. Results
3.1. Results from the Quantitative Method
3.1.1. Background Information of the Study Participant
3.1.2. Competence and User Perceptions of e-LMIS Utilization
3.2. Results from In-Depth Interview
3.2.1. Theme 1: Competence with e-LMIS
3.2.2. Theme 2: Factors Influencing Competence
3.2.3. Theme 3: e-LMIS Implications on Medicine Supply Chain
3.2.4. Theme 4: Strategies for Improvement
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributors
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sahu S, Shyama N, Chokshi M, et al. Effectiveness of supply chain planning in ensuring availability of CD/NCD drugs in non-metropolitan and rural public health system. Journal of Health Management 2022, 24, 132–145. [CrossRef]
- Tiye K, Gudeta T. Logistics management information system performance for program drugs in public health facilities of East Wollega Zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2018, 18, 133. [CrossRef]
- Hailu R, Gizaw T, Berhanu N, Mulugeta T, Boche B, Gudeta T. Exploring the role of ICT in pharmaceutical supply chain practices and operational performance in Ethiopia: a structural equation modeling approach. BMC Health Services Research 2023, 23, 634. [CrossRef]
- USAID Deliver. The Logistics Handbook: A Practical Guide for the Supply Chain Management of Health Commodities. USAID | Deliv Proj Task Order 1. 2011;174.
- Kessy SS, Salema GL, Simwita Y. Lean thinking in medical commodities supply chains: applicability and success factors for Tanzanian health supply chains. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 2024, 14, 105–117. [CrossRef]
- Kesale AM, Jiyenze MK, Katalambula L, et al. Perceived performance of health facility governing committees in overseeing healthcare services delivery in primary health care facilities in Tanzania. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 2023, 38, 239–251. [CrossRef]
- Afrizal SH, Handayani PW, Hidayanto AN, Eryando T, Budiharsana M, Martha E. Barriers and challenges to Primary Health Care Information System (PHCIS) adoption from health management perspective: A qualitative study. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2019, 17, 100198. [CrossRef]
- Silabi E, Sukums F, Paulo H. The effect of IMPACT team approach implementation processes on health supply chain management data use in Singida region: A quantitative study. East African Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation. 2023, 4. [CrossRef]
- Armah C, Duncan EG. Factors Influencing the Utilisation of Electronic Logistics Management Information Systems. SJIS-P 2024, 36, 1–4.
- National Bureau of Statistics. Population Size in Tanzania. 2022. https://sensa.nbs.go.tz/. Accessed 9 February 2024.
- Karimi A, Mishra A, Natarajan KV, Sinha KK. Managing commodity stock-outs in public health supply chains in developing countries: An empirical analysis. Production and Operations Management 2021, 30, 3116–3142. [CrossRef]
- Tewfik, S. The Assessment of e-LMIS Implementation and User Satisfaction for Pharmaceutical Management in Public Health Facilities of the Addis Ababa Regional Health Bureau (Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University). 2018.
- Dinka A, Tilahun G. Logistics management information system performance for laboratory commodities in public health facilities of west Shoa zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia: A facility-based concurrent explanatory mixed-method design. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2023, 8, 214–228. [CrossRef]
- Kabera JC, Mukanyangezi MF. Influence of inventory management practices on the availability of emergency obstetric drugs in Rwandan public hospitals: a case of Rwanda Southern Province. BMC Health Services Research. 2024, 24, 14. [CrossRef]
- Mochache D, Chinyanganya F, Ngidari J. Pharmaceutical logistics assessment in South Sudan. 2011:122;15-32.
- Sindambiwe, J.P. Evaluating Impact of Electronic Logistic Management Information System in Rwanda Health Supply Chain (Doctoral dissertation). 2019.
- Wasswa JH, Oundo H, Oteba MO, et al. Leveraging electronic logistics management information systems to enhance and optimize supply chain response during public health emergencies: lessons from COVID-19 response in Uganda. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice 2023, 16, 6. [CrossRef]
- Lugada E, Komakech H, Ochola I, Mwebaze S, Olowo Oteba M, Okidi Ladwar D. Health supply chain system in Uganda: current issues, structure, performance, and implications for systems strengthening. Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice 2022, 15, 14. [CrossRef]
| Background Information | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Age Category of the participant | ||
| 15-25 | 11 | 10.4 |
| 26-35 | 78 | 73.6 |
| 36-45 | 8 | 7.5 |
| Above 45 | 9 | 8.5 |
| Mean age ±SD | 32.7±7.6 | |
| Sex of the participant | ||
| Male | 53 | 50.0 |
| Female | 53 | 50.0 |
| Educational level | ||
| Certificate | 46 | 43.4 |
| Diploma | 55 | 51.9 |
| Bachelor | 5 | 4.7 |
| Facility level | ||
| Dispensary | 81 | 76.4 |
| Health Center | 13 | 12.3 |
| Hospital | 12 | 11.3 |
| Job Title | ||
| Medical Doctor | 3 | 2.8 |
| Clinical officer | 43 | 40.6 |
| Nurse | 40 | 37.7 |
| Medical Attendant | 3 | 2.8 |
| Other; specify | 17 | 16.0 |
| Roles and Responsibilities | ||
| Facility in charge | 39 | 36.8 |
| Store in charge | 34 | 32.1 |
| Medicine Dispenser | 19 | 17.9 |
| Prescriber | 14 | 13.2 |
| Working experience in the e-LMIS | ||
| One to two years | 59 | 55.7 |
| Three and more years | 47 | 44.3 |
| Variable/Response | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Level of Competence in Utilization of e-LMIS | ||
| Very Competent | 3 | 2.8 |
| Competent | 34 | 32.1 |
| Somehow Competent | 66 | 62.3 |
| Not Competent | 3 | 2.8 |
| Confidence in fulfilling e-LMIS duties | ||
| Very confident | 45 | 42.5 |
| Confident | 43 | 40.6 |
| Somehow confident | 17 | 16.0 |
| Not confident at all | 1 | 0.9 |
| Access to Technology (Facility has computer) | ||
| Yes (observed) | 106 | 100.0 |
| No | 0 | 0 |
| System Perceptions | ||
| e-LMIS user friendly and easy to use | ||
| Yes | 85 | 80.2 |
| No | 21 | 19.8 |
| Orders Placed per Quarter (3 months) | ||
| 1 time | 66 | 62.3 |
| 2 times | 27 | 25.5 |
| More than 2 times | 13 | 12.3 |
| Timeliness of R&R Revisions | ||
| Yes | 72 | 67.9 |
| No | 34 | 32.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
