Submitted:
23 April 2024
Posted:
24 April 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Problem Statement
1.2. Research Question
1.2.1. Main Research Question
-
Sub-questions:
- a)
- What factors influence the levels of sulfur dioxide () exposure in Kankoyo, particularly concerning the proximity to the mining site?
- b)
- What correlations exist between variations in sulfur dioxide () exposure levels and the incidence of respiratory symptoms among residents of Kankoyo?
- c)
- What is the level of awareness among Kankoyo residents regarding the potential health risks associated with exposure?
- d)
- What trends or patterns are observed in the prevalence of respiratory illnesses in Kankoyo over time and corresponding levels of exposure?
1.3. Area of Study
2. Literature Review
2.1. Mining and Air Pollution in Zambia
2.2. Previous Findings in Kankoyo
3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Community Engagement and Expert Interviews
3.2. Spatial Analysis
3.3. Retrospective Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Community Engagement
4.1.1. Thematic Maps
4.1.2. Aggregated Themes
-
Focus Group 1
- a)
-
Health Impacts of Air Pollution;Participants deliberated on the adverse health consequences of air pollution, including weakened immune systems, respiratory illnesses, and TB prevalence, with some mentioning the tragic death of an infant due to sulfur exposure. One participant recounted, stating:"If you already have bronchitis or asthma, when you inhale sulphur dioxide, the cough worsens and can become persistent. Some people who have never had a serious cough still experience continuous coughing, resembling flu symptoms. It’s especially distressing for babies, I remember a case in Section C where a baby died under similar circumstances."(speaker 3, female)Another speaker added:"Sometimes there are situations when sulphur is released, and then when you inhale, you experience serious chest pains."(Speaker 2, Male)Another resident shared a particularly impactful case of sulfur dioxide exposure she experienced in 2018. While walking with friends on Fibusa grounds, directly opposite the acid plant in Kankoyo, she inhaled a high concentration of sulfur released from the plant. She described experiencing immediate fainting and chest pains later confirmed by medical reports from Malcolm Moffat Hospital as respiratory distress linked to the exposure. Despite this documented case, the participant reported receiving no further support, highlighting potential gaps in accountability and community support mechanisms. (Speaker 8, Female)
- b)
-
Inadequate Healthcare and Support;Challenges accessing healthcare were highlighted, including medication shortages, discrimination at clinics, and inadequate support for chronic conditions. Speakers recounted their experiences:"Even when you go to the clinic or hospital, they will just brush it off, especially if you mention ’Kankoyo’ at the end they won’t care at all."(Speaker 2, Female)Additionally, another participant made an observation."Sometimes there are situations where medicine, let’s say for those of us who frequently experience respiratory blockages or have conditions like asthma, should always be available. Why should there be shortages of medication?"(Speaker 3, Female)
- c)
-
Environmental Damage and Livelihood Difficulties;Beyond health concerns, participants discussed environmental damage, such as damaged crops and houses, impacting their ability to sustain livelihoods."Here in Kankoyo, we’ve truly suffered. If you look around, we don’t have the opportunity to cultivate anything because our land is destroyed. Unlike our friends in townships like Kamuchanga and others, who can at least grow something like kalembula and chibwabwa in their backyard gardens, here, it’s a different story,"(Speaker 7, Female)observed one speaker.
- d)
-
Distrust and Frustration with Authorities;There was a general sense of distrust in the government and the mining company, with participants questioning the accuracy of monitoring and transparency in decision-making. One speaker expressed skepticism"Sister, to tell the truth, I don’t trust the readings from this monitoring station. In my opinion, they’re not accurate because if they were, there would have been follow-up actions. They’re giving the government incorrect readings. I recall a time when the government (ZEMA) brought their monitoring station, and mysteriously enough, sulfur emissions ceased when they arrived."(Speaker 4, Male)
- e)
-
Coping Mechanisms and Resilience;Despite difficulties, participants shared coping mechanisms like utilizing home remedies and seeking assistance within the community. Some participants recounted:"We’ve become accustomed to it. When sulfur is released, there’s nowhere to escape as long as you’re breathing. Everything in this area is affected. Sometimes, you just have to lock yourself indoors, but you’ll still smell it."(Speaker 4, Male)"As for me, I used to carry Colgate and strong cough sweets. The fresh scent and the sensation of breathing in deeply would make me feel better. Sometimes, even Vicks would provide relief."(Speaker 7, Female)
-
Focus Group 2
- f)
-
Declining Air Quality and its Impact on Health;Participants expressed concerns about deteriorating air quality and its link to respiratory illnesses, highlighting the invisible nature of sulfur emissions.One participant noted,"It’s just the same. In fact, it has become worse. We used to see sulfur being released a long time ago, but now it comes hidden, very powerful, very strong, even affecting our chests without us seeing what has hit us."(Speaker 1, Male)Another participant shared their personal experience, saying,"As for me, I first started feeling sick in 2014, but it has gotten worse now. On December 13th, 2023, I was discharged from the hospital after being admitted due to chest pains."(Speaker 5, Male)
- g)
-
Impact on different age groups;Participants emphasized that age was not a determining factor in how pollution affected them. One remarked:"There is nothing like being old or young, everyone gets affected. Where can one go because if it’s a baby, it’s a problem throughout?"(Speaker 2, Male)Another participant echoed this sentiment, stating,"As long as you are breathing, you are supposed to get affected. There is nothing like being old or young, everyone gets sick."(Speaker 1, Male)A mother shared her emotional experience with her 6-year-old boy, expressing the challenges they face due to pollution-related health issues, saying,"After he was born, we stayed a bit, and then he started experiencing blockages just like this because we used to stay on this side of Kankoyo, section C. So when sulfur gets released, sometimes he would briefly die, only to wake up in the hospital with oxygen. He is not okay in the chest. He was later diagnosed with asthma after several tests."(Speaker 8, Female)
- h)
-
Community Engagement and Desire for Solutions;Despite challenges, the community remained engaged and hopeful for improvement, calling for solutions and better healthcare access.One participant suggested,"Government, the health minister, and the ministry of mines should sit down together to find a new place because we are in danger here."(Speaker 1, Male)Another participant emphasized the urgency of relocation, stating,"Yes, relocating us to another area is necessary because otherwise, we will continue to fall ill. This entire place should be designated as a mining zone."( Speaker 5, Male)Contrarily, another participant voiced a different concern, saying,"My main complaint is that even if we don’t relocate, they should provide us with money and food. When someone is sick and lacks food, their illness will only worsen.”(Speaker 3, Male)
-
Focus Group 3
- i)
-
Unequal Exposure and its Consequences;Participants discussed the unequal distribution of pollution exposure, with those near mining sites experiencing higher levels of pollution and health concerns.One ex-miner recounted,"It’s just the same because when you leave the mine, you inhale something else outside. It even becomes worse sometimes. As you leave the mine, you find sulfur has already been released on the surface. So there is no difference; it’s just the same everywhere."(Speaker 1, Male)Another speaker observed,"Those who are closer to the mine, the areas are dangerous because even just the explosives, when they start them, you just feel as though you will be buried underground. So that’s why they say people who reside on the other side should relocate because the area is not good."(Speaker 2, Female)Furthermore, another speaker added,"When sulfur is released, it comes with power, especially to us who are very close. You find that for those who live further away from the mine, by the time sulfur reaches their area, it would have lost its strength. While you, who are close, would have already inhaled a lot. So that’s the difference that is there."(Speaker 3, Female)Distrust in Monitoring and Transparency; Deep distrust in official monitoring efforts was expressed, with demands for independent verification and transparency. One participant observed:"That is why people from government (ZEMA) let’s also put it this way: we compare if indeed these readings we are given are correct, you see? So, this thing they have mounted here is only meant to blind us."(Speaker 4, Male)Another participant expressed shock and made this observation:"Now see, sister, this is why I laugh at the government. The situation was supposed to be that once the mine comes to collect their readings, they also carry along someone from the community-based volunteers to witness and know the truth, you see? There is no one that they carry along, they just check the readings alone. So even when they discover that the readings are high, they won’t tell anyone; they check alone. Once they come out, their response is, everything is okay."(Speaker 5, Female)
- j)
-
Community Challenges and Coping Mechanisms;The community faced challenges such as a lack of knowledge about mitigation tools and living with uncertainty, leading to protests and demands for better support and education initiatives.One participant lamented:"So now, because of their lies, that is why you see our children; once they get upset, they start rioting. This sulfur has caused deaths for residents; a newborn baby once died just after being exposed to sulfur. Someone is walking suddenly they die, so we start riots here. It’s just now that we have slightly behaved ourselves, sometime back it was bad."(Speaker 6, Female)
4.1.3. A Comparative analysis of three Kankoyo Focus Groups
4.2. Expert Interview Findings
4.2.1. Clinic Officer
- 1.
-
Healthcare Operations and Data Collection;Clinic 5 is available on a 24/7 basis and structured into departments and data collection procedures. And transition to digital systems, like Smart Care, is on the way for enhanced data management. Limitations in advanced diagnostic equipment necessitate collaboration with external facilities."We lack the necessary equipment for testing. We don’t have the tools, we don’t have enough resources. We have to rely on the lab. Yes, these are some of the challenges. So, you often end up sending your patients to the hospital for tests, but they don’t always return with the results. Sometimes it’s because they lack transportation. So, they resort to buying over-the-counter drugs like Amoxil and Panadol and self-medicate. Then, months later, they return when their condition has worsened."
- 2.
-
Environmental Factors and Respiratory Health;While directly attributing health conditions to specific pollutants is challenging, the Clinic Officer acknowledges the potential impact of emissions from mining activities on respiratory health."When it comes to treatment, pinpointing respiratory illnesses solely due to sulfur dioxide exposure is a challenge. Diagnosing conditions based solely on this exposure is difficult, ideally, we should be relying on diagnostic equipment to distinguish between ailments like pneumonia, TB, bronchitis, or whooping cough, but unfortunately, we lack such equipment. As a result, clinical treatment is typically based on symptoms."
- 3.
-
Reduction in Asthma cases;A perceived decrease in asthma cases was observed after the installation of air quality monitoring equipment by the mining company."There has been noticeable improvement and change. Before the installation of the equipment, we saw a high influx of patients, particularly those with asthma, a common respiratory condition exacerbated by risk factors prevalent in mining areas. The number of cases was overwhelming. However, since the installation of the equipment, the frequency has significantly decreased. Previously, we could see up to 10, 15, or even 20 cases in a day, but now it’s only one or two. This shows a significant improvement that the new equipment has made possible by facilitating better control over sulfur dioxide emissions."
- 4.
-
Respiratory cases linked to environmental pollution;An estimated 75% of treated respiratory cases are potentially linked to environmental pollution, primarily emissions."About three-quarters of the cases are related to respiratory tract infections, likely linked to the mining area mostly sulfur. However, there are also cases of malaria and diarrhea, but respiratory tract infections are predominant in the area."
4.2.2. Senior Environmental Specialist
- 5.
-
Data Sharing and Monitoring;
- Mopani provides certain emission-related information upon request, but routine data sharing of all pollution points is not standard practice."But they don’t share that information proactively; we have to specifically request it. However, upon request, they can provide us with the necessary data."
- Real-time monitoring of air emissions allows continuous tracking of pollution levels."Yeah, Mopani has more than one monitoring station. We have one at clinic 5, and there are others at different clinics."
- While is a primary focus, other potential relevant pollutants could exist."To the best of my knowledge, there may be other particulate matter such as solids or liquids, but what I know for certain is sulphur."
- 6.
-
Mitigation Measures and Community Engagement;
- The establishment of emergency trays for individuals with asthma reflects a reactive approach to managing health impacts."There has been some concern regarding the health and safety of the city, particularly for individuals with conditions like asthma. The company had previously established numerous emergency trays in various communities, especially when sulphur was released. However, this time around, they haven’t done so. I believe emergency trays are still available for asthma patients exposed to sulfur, facilitating easy access to treatment. This initiative was implemented before the smelter plants were upgraded."
- The environmental specialist further noted that monitoring stations contributed to emission control and adherence to established thresholds.
- 7.
-
Continuous Improvement Commitment
- The Senior Environmental Officer emphasized the need for ongoing improvement in mining operations to minimize environmental and health impacts."So together, we can manage to control and prevent the spread of these high-efficiency pollutants. Ultimately, the goal goes back to Mopani to continuously improve its operations. At least there have been reductions both from the health and environmental perspectives."
5. Spatial Analysis Findings
6. Retrospective Data Analysis Findings
- a)
- What correlations exist between variations in sulfur dioxide () exposure levels and the incidence of respiratory symptoms among residents of Kankoyo?
- b)
- What trends or patterns are observed in the prevalence of respiratory illnesses in Kankoyo over time and corresponding levels of exposure?
6.1. Temporal Trends and Patterns
6.1.1. Time Series Analysis
6.1.2. Seasonal Variation Analysis
Insights from Seasonal Variation Analysis
6.1.3. Correlation Analysis
7. Discussion
7.1. Triangulation
8. Conclusions
- ZEMA should implement a unified policy mandating mining companies to make available real-time and other sources of pollution data accessible not only to ZEMA but researchers, affected communities, and the Ministry of Health via the district health offices. This data should be made accessible through user-friendly online platforms or public display systems to enhance transparency and inform policy decisions related to air quality and public health concerns.
- ZEMA should invest in deploying low-cost air quality sensors as commended by the World Health Organization [1] and Chihana et al. [34] to alleviate financial burdens and supplement existing monitoring methods. Additionally, leveraging data science techniques to enhance data analysis offers deeper insights into air pollution patterns and their implications for public health.
- The Ministry of Health should strengthen policies to ensure a consistent supply of essential medication for related respiratory conditions in Kankoyo. This would reduce the burden and health risk of residents relying on less-effective over-the-counter medications.
- And as a long-term measure, the ministry should explore the possibility of establishing specialized respiratory labs within Kankoyo Clinic 5 and other facilities around the mine area equipped with advanced diagnostic machines. This would improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce the number of required referrals, and enable data collection for research, monitoring, and providing targeted interventions.
- Launch a multifaceted informational campaign utilizing social media, websites, mobile applications, and community-focused platforms. Develop engaging educational materials (videos, advanced visualizations through mathematical simulations, etc.) to increase understanding of the health dangers linked to exposure and enable people to take steps to prevent themselves.
- Establish strong partnerships between mining companies, universities, research centers, government agencies, and the Kankoyo community. This collaboration should focus on ongoing air quality monitoring, comprehensive health impact assessments, and the development of evidence-based solutions tailored to the local context.
Author Contributions
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- WHO. Overview of Methods to Assess Population Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution, 2023.
- WHO. WHO Global Air Quality guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, Nitrogen dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide; Geneva WHO, 2021.
- ZEMA., 2014.
- Wang, L.; Liu, C.; Meng, X.; Niu, Y.; Lin, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Qi, J.; You, J.; Tse, L.A.; Chen, J.; Zhou, M.; Chen, R.; Yin, P.; Kan, H. Associations between short-term exposure to ambient sulfur dioxide and increased cause-specific mortality in 272 Chinese cities. Environment International 2018, 117, 33–39. [CrossRef]
- Nurhisanah, S.; Hasyim, H. Environmental health risk assessment of sulfur dioxide (SO2) at workers around in combined cycle power plant (CCPP). Heliyon 2022, 8, e09388. [CrossRef]
- Anenberg, S.C.; Belova, A.; Brandt, J.; Fann, N.; Greco, S.; Guttikunda, S.; Heroux, M.E.; Hurley, F.; Krzyzanowski, M.; Medina, S.; Miller, B.; Pandey, K.; Roos, J.; Van Dingenen, R. Survey of Ambient Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment Tools. Risk Analysis 2016, 36, 1718–1736. [CrossRef]
- , W. WHO Expert Meeting: Methods and tools for assessing the health risks of air pollution at local, national and international level, 2014.
- Burnett, P. Mopani Copper Mines Conflict, 2015.
- Muma, D.; Besa, B.; Manchisi, J.; Banda, W. Effects of mining operations on air and water quality in Mufulira district of Zambia: A case study of Kankoyo Township. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2020, 120, 287–298. [CrossRef]
- Mwaanga, P.; Silondwa, M.; Kasali, G.; Banda, P.M. Preliminary review of mine air pollution in Zambia. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02485. [CrossRef]
- Nachalwe, P. Management of Environmental Risks Arising from Mining Operations in Kitwe and Mufulira. PhD thesis, 2020.
- Jain, N.; Munshifwa, E.K.; Chileshe, R.A.; Mumba, A. SOCIAL COSTS AND PRICING AMBIENT AIR POLLUTION. Case of Kankoyo Township (Mufulira), Zambia. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences 2021, 4. [CrossRef]
- TV Zambia, D. THE DIGEST : THE EFFECTS OF MINING OPERATIONS ON KANKOYO TOWNSHIP, 2022.
- ZSA. 2022 Census of Population and Housing, 18th August - 14th September 2022, Preliminary Report: Republic of Zambia. Technical report, 2022.
- (n.d.), A. Urban Air Pollution: Sources and Pollutants – Airqoon, 2024.
- Izydorczyk, G.; Mikula, K.; Skrzypczak, D.; Moustakas, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A.; Chojnacka, K. Potential environmental pollution from copper metallurgy and methods of management. Environmental Research 2021, 197, 111050. [CrossRef]
- Serbula, S.M.; Ilic, A.A.; Kalinovic, J.V.; Kalinovic, T.S.; Petrovic, N.B. Assessment of air pollution originating from copper smelter in Bor (Serbia). Environmental Earth Sciences 2013, 71, 1651–1661. [CrossRef]
- General, O.o.t.A. Compliance Audit Report on the Awarding and Monitoring of Mining Rights for 2017 Accounts., 2017.
- PWC. Zambia 2023 Mining Report, 2023.
- Axenhamn, L.; Simukanga, P.S. Preparation of phase 2 of a consolidated environmental management plan, 2005.
- Kolala, C.; Bwalya Umar, B. National benefits, local costs? Local residents’ views on environmental and social effects of large-scale mining in Chingola, Zambia. Natural Resources Forum 2019, 43, 205–217. [CrossRef]
- Chanda, S.; Moono, W. The Effect of Mining on the Environment: A case Study of Kankoyo Township of Mufulira District of the Republic of Zambia. 2017.
- Ncube, E.; Banda, C.; Mundike, J. Air pollution on the Copperbelt province of Zambia, its sulphur dioxide effects on vegetation and possibly humans. Journal of Natural and Environmental Sciences 2012, 3, 34–41.
- Siame, K. Environmental Effects of Mining on Local Communities in Kitwe and Mufulira in Copperbelt province, Zambia. PhD thesis, 2018.
- Mufumbi, G. Mathematical Modeling of Sulphur Dioxide Pollution in Selected Mining Companies. www.academia.edu 2021.
- Chihana, S.; Mbale, J.; Chaamwe, N. Leveraging Machine Learning for Ambient Air Pollutant Prediction: The Zambian Mining Environment Context. Proceedings of International Conference for ICT (ICICT) - Zambia 2022, 4, 1–5.
- International Communication Systems and Networks and Workshops, COMSNETS. A Case Study on Kernel Density Estimation and Hotspot Analysis Methods in Traffic Safety Management. IEEE, 2020. [CrossRef]
- Yuan, K.; Cheng, X.; Gui, Z.; Li, F.; Wu, H. A quad-tree-based fast and adaptive Kernel Density Estimation algorithm for heat-map generation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2019, 33, 2455–2476. [CrossRef]
- Abdallah, G.K.; Eijdenberg, E.L. Entry and Stay in the Informal Economy: Qualitative Findings from a Least Developed Country. Journal of Enterprising Culture 2019, 27, 115–145. [CrossRef]
- Chao, K.; Islam Sarker, N.; Ali, I.; Radin, B.; Azman, A.; Mohammed Shaed, M. Big data-driven public health policy making: Potential for the healthcare industry. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19681–e19681. [CrossRef]
- Ejidoh, U.N. The role of data analytics in environmental health, 2023.
- Mumba, E. Mopani Copper Mine Smelter Upgrade Completed Ahead of Schedule, 2014.
- Gogtay, N.J.; Thatte, U.M. Principles of Correlation Analysis. Journal of The Association of Physicians of India 2017, 65, 78–81.
- Chihana, S.; Mbale, J.; Chaamwe, N. Comparative Analysis of IoT Architectures for Mine Environmental Monitoring: A Literature Review and Evaluation. Proceedings of International Conference for ICT (ICICT) - Zambia 2023, 5, 70–76.











| Study | Key Findings | Methodology | Limitations |
| [10] | Investigated Air pollution (, PM) from mining and its effects on health, plants, animals, and infrastructure. |
Comprehensive literature review |
Broad understanding of mine pollution effects on the environment from a literature point of view. |
| [21] | Air, noise and water pollution, job losses. |
Interviews, statistical analysis |
Focused on corporate social responsibility. |
| [22] | Pollution, dust, and heavy metals are harmful to the environment. |
Case study, interviews, and document reviews |
Focused on multiple pollutants. |
| [23] | and metals harm vegetation, wildlife. | Gas concentration measurements |
Limited to one plant species and limited sampling points. No health impact analysis |
| [24] | Investigated the effect of mining on some parts of Kitwe and Mufulira. |
The study was qualitative, using a case study design and purposive sampling technique |
The study was broad as it looked at various effects of mining on the environment in Kitwe and Mufulira. |
| [25] | Looked at mathematical models that depict the dispersion and concentration of emissions from specific mining firms |
Mathematical Modeling Approaches |
The study focused on modeling sulfur movement in mining areas using mathematical approaches |
| [9] | Explored the impacts of releases and discharge of mine waste on the air and water quality in Kankoyo Township. |
Case study, mixed-methods approach |
The study didn’t investigate potential health effects of on residents. |
| [11] | 88% of respondents in Kankoyo reported RTIs as a primary health concern attributed to |
Case study (Kitwe and Mufulira Kankoyo), interviews |
Focused on environmental risk management systems. No detailed findings were made on health effects or its potential link to sulfur. |
| [12] | Residents reported various health issues, including fatalities, attributed to air pollution in Kankoyo ( emissions). |
Hedonic-pricing and Contingent Valuation Method |
Investigated the correlation between emissions and their impact on residential property values in the Kankoyo. |
| Group | Demographics | Participant Code | Age Range |
| FG1 | Mixed (4 females, 4 males) | FG1-SP1 - FG1-SP8 | Age range: 20-50s |
| FG2 | Mixed (2 females, 6 males) | FG2-SP1 - FG2-SP8 | Age range: 6-70s |
| FG3 | Mixed (3 females, 5 males) | FG3-SP1 - FG3-SP8 | Age range: 20-50s |
| Interview | Participant ID | Affiliation | Expertise |
| EX1 | EX1-EP1 | Kankoyo Clinic 5 | Clinic Officer |
| EX1 | EX2-EP2 | District Health Office | Senior Environmental Specialist |
| Theme | Focus Group 1 | Focus Group 2 | Focus Group 3 | Connection to Research Question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Impacts | severe respiratory problems (coughing, chest tightness, asthma) impact all age groups. Individual Story: A resident experienced immediate fainting after inhaling sulphur. Medical reports confirmed exposure and diagnosed respiratory distress. |
Emphasized worsening conditions, highlighted hidden pollutants causing internal damage, and mentioned the death of a newborn attributed to sulfur exposure. |
mentioned silica dust exposure near the mine, focusing on cumulative effects such as damaged houses and infrastructure |
Direct inhalation of can exacerbate respiratory problems, as evidenced by the resident’s case. Hidden pollutant exposure (mentioned by other groups) could pose additional health risks, warranting further investigation. |
| Distrust & Information | Doubts about air quality monitoring data accuracy, suspicion of manipulation by the mining company. |
Mentioned past organizations promising help without action. |
Highlighted distrust in the monitoring station and described witnessing night-time releases to evade detection. |
Lack of trust in monitoring data could obstruct understanding of exposure levels and risks. |
|
Lack of Support & Resources |
Inadequate healthcare access and medication shortages, discriminatory treatment at facilities |
Mentioned trouble obtaining asthma medication. Emphasized financial hardship due to illness |
described struggles getting medication even within the facility |
Limited access to healthcare and medication might hinder treatment for - related health issues. |
| Environmental Damage | Mentioned property damage (roofing sheets) due to air pollution, describes the impact on agriculture (burnt crops) |
Mentioned damage to property (roofing sheets) due to air pollution. |
Mentions destroyed land and limited agricultural possibilities and impact on roofing sheets. |
Environmental damage might affect exposure pathways and exacerbate health impacts. |
| Coping Mechanisms | Individual coping strategies, like home remedies and staying indoors, described feeling frustrated and helpless |
No specific mentions of individual coping strategies |
Shared experience of adapting routines and using home remedies, describes community frustration leading to occasional rioting in the past |
Individual coping strategies might not be sustainable, and limited community resources hinder effective response. |
| Specific Concerns | Mentioned nighttime releases of pollutants, described additional unidentified pollutants besides sulfur dioxide |
focused on acid production as a recent source of increased pollution. Further highlighted knowledge of specific emission days |
mentioned nighttime releases of pollutants, focuses on silica dust exposure near the mine, shares experience with sulfur dioxide being released at night |
Nighttime releases could increase inhalation risks and suspected pollutants require investigation for potential health impacts. |
| Main Demands | Calls for improved healthcare access and medication availability, expresses the desire for relocation, compensation, and food support |
Places strongest emphasis on relocation as the primary solution, mentions the need for compensation and food support, desires financial resources for farming activities |
Calls for transparency and community involvement in monitoring, expresses a desire for relocation or improved living conditions. |
Addressing demands could improve living conditions, reduce exposure, and enhance community engagement, crucial for managing health risks. |
| Theme | Community Concerns (Focus Groups) |
Clinic Officer Findings |
Environmental Health Specialist Findings |
Potential Link to Research Question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Widespread Respiratory Problems |
Breathing difficulties, long-term health anxieties, short-term health effects, silica dust exposure (Group 3). |
Positive trend in asthma cases after air quality monitoring installation, potential link between and respiratory ailments, |
detrimental impact of on respiratory health, citing emergency trays for asthma cases. |
Supports a potential link between reported health issues and inhalation. Clinic data aligns with concerns about long-term impacts. |
|
Distrust in Monitoring Data |
Lack of trust in data accuracy, transparency demands, data manipulation concerns (Group 3) |
Challenges in directly attributing illnesses to specific pollutants due to the unavailability of equipment for diagnosis. |
Real-time monitoring of emissions has seen a reduction in both pollution and respiratory cases |
Highlights need for more robust data collection, analysis, and transparency to address community concerns. |
|
Limited Healthcare Access and Resources |
Inadequate healthcare access, medication burdens, healthcare facility challenges (Group 3) |
Transition to digital systems for improved data management, limitations in advanced Equipment, |
N/A (not directly discussed in this interview) |
Emphasized the importance of addressing limited healthcare access and resources to improve treatment and preventive measures. |
| Theme |
Community Concerns (Focus Groups) |
Clinic Officer Findings |
Environmental Health Specialist Findings |
Potential Link to Research Question |
|
Environmental Damage Beyond Health |
Property damage, broader environmental consequences, damaged land, limited agriculture (Group 3) |
N/A (not directly discussed in this interview) |
Detrimental effects of on both environment and health, including damage to vegetation, soil, and infrastructure |
Confirms and expands upon community observations, underlining the urgency of addressing broader environmental impacts. |
|
Specific Concerns and Demands |
Nighttime pollutant releases, unidentified pollutants, recent acid production increases (Group 2), silica dust and nighttime releases (Group 3) |
Estimates 75% of treated respiratory cases potentially linked to environmental pollution, primarily emissions |
N/A (not directly discussed in this interview) |
Provides valuable insights into specific community concerns and demands, guiding potential solutions and interventions. |
| Respiratory Illnesses Vs. |
Spearman Correlation Coefficient |
P-value | Correlation Interpretation | P-value Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asthma y | -0.0001 | 0.9986 | No correlation | Not Significant |
| Asthma (1-4)y | 0.0237 | 0.7529 | Weak positive correlation | Not Significant |
| Asthma year | -0.5090 | 3.4514e-13 | Strong negative correlation | Highly Significant |
| RI: non-P y | -0.2111 | 0.0046 | Moderate negative correlation | Significant |
| RI: non-P (1-4)y | -0.1312 | 0.0799 | Weak negative correlation | Marginally Significant |
| RI: non-P year | -0.3482 | 1.7869e-06 | Moderate negative correlation | Highly Significant |
| RI: P y | -0.0619 | 0.4103 | Weak negative correlation | Not Significant |
| RI: P (1-4)y | 0.0254 | 0.7360 | Weak positive correlation | Not Significant |
| RI: P year | -0.5734 | 4.9335e-17 | Strong negative correlation | Highly Significant |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).