Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Performance and Cost-Efficiency of Single Hormonal Treatment Protocols in Tropical Anestrous Dairy Cows

Version 1 : Received: 15 April 2024 / Approved: 16 April 2024 / Online: 16 April 2024 (11:25:55 CEST)

How to cite: Changtes, T.; Sanchez, J.; Arunvipas, P.; Patanasatienkul, T.; Thammahakin, P.; Jaroensawat, J.; Hall, D.; Heider, L.; Rukkwamsuk, T. Performance and Cost-Efficiency of Single Hormonal Treatment Protocols in Tropical Anestrous Dairy Cows. Preprints 2024, 2024041048. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1048.v1 Changtes, T.; Sanchez, J.; Arunvipas, P.; Patanasatienkul, T.; Thammahakin, P.; Jaroensawat, J.; Hall, D.; Heider, L.; Rukkwamsuk, T. Performance and Cost-Efficiency of Single Hormonal Treatment Protocols in Tropical Anestrous Dairy Cows. Preprints 2024, 2024041048. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1048.v1

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the performance of the hormone treatment protocols, determine the factors associated with pregnancy success after hormone treatment, and compare the cost-efficiencies of two types of hormone treatment among cyclic and noncyclic anestrous dairy cows. The clinical records of 279 anestrous cows who received hormone treatment for artificial insemination (AI) from 64 herds in the western region of Thailand were obtained from Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital from January to August 2017. The performance of the hormone treatment protocols, fixed-time AI (TAI) and estrus detection before AI (EAI), showed that the pregnancy risk for the TAI protocol was higher than for the EAI protocol, but pregnancy per AI did not differ significantly between the two protocols in cyclic and noncyclic cows. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that cows receiving the TAI protocol were more likely to be pregnant compared to those treated with the EAI protocol. Cows with a 3.00 body condition score (BCS) <3.75 after treatment and loose-housing cows were more likely to become pregnant. Treatment during winter showed higher pregnancy success than in the summer and rainy seasons. The cost-efficiency analysis showed that the TAI protocol was the most cost-efficient option for noncyclic cows, whereas the EAI protocol was the most cost-efficient option for cyclic cows.

Keywords

dairy cow; anestrous; cost-effective; hormone treatment; reproductive performance

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Zoology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.