Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Rethinking the Esterquats: Synthesis, Stability, Ecotoxicity and Applications of Esterquats Incorporating Analogs of Betaine or Choline as the Cation in Their Structure

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

15 April 2024

Posted:

15 April 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Esterquats constitute a unique group of quaternary ammonium salts (QASs) that contain an ester bond in the structure of the cation. Despite the numerous advantages of this class of compounds, only two mini-reviews discuss the subject of esterquats: the first one (2007) briefly summarizes their types, synthesis, and structural elements required for a beneficial environmental profile and only briefly covers their applications whereas the second one only reviews the stability of selected betaine-type esterquats in aqueous solutions. The rationale for writing this review is to critically reevaluate the relevant literature and provide others with a “state-of-the-art” snapshot of choline-type esterquats and betaine-type esterquats. Hence, the first part of this survey thoroughly summarizes the most important scientific reports demonstrating effective synthesis routes leading to the formation of both types of esterquats. In the second section, the susceptibility of esterquats to hydrolysis is explained, and the influence of various factors, such as the pH, the degree of salinity or the temperature of the solution, was subjected to thorough analysis that includes quantitative components. The next two sections refer to various aspects associated with the ecotoxicity of esterquats. Consequently, their biodegradation and toxic effects on microorganisms are extensively analyzed as crucial factors that can affect their commercialization. Then, the reported applications of esterquats are briefly discussed, including functionalization of macromolecules, such as cotton fabric as well as their successful utilization on a commercial scale. The last section demonstrates the most essential conclusions and reported drawbacks that allow us to elucidate future recommendations regarding the development of these promising chemicals.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Quaternary ammonium salts (QASs or “quats”) are commonly known as organic compounds that incorporate a positively charged nitrogen atom substituted with four alkyl substituents as a cation and any compatible counterion as the anion. Historically, the term “esterquat” was first used in 1931 in a patent application to define a specific quaternary ammonium salt that possessed an ester linkage within the the cation [1,2]. Few examples of the popular esterquats are shown in Figure 1, with ester linkages highlighted in different colors.
The ester bond within esterquats’ structures facilitates their hydrolysis and biodegradation, which allows chemists to perceive them as more environmentally friendly compounds compared to QASs bearing saturated or unsaturated alkyl chains on their nitrogen atoms, and containing only C–C and C–N bonds within the cation [3,4,5]. For instance, both chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis of betaine esterquats yield glycine betaine and fatty alcohol, both products that can be regarded as environmentally safe and possibly even edible [2]. Consequently, esterquats are capable of demonstrating lower toxicity and persistence in the biosphere in comparison to classical QASs. However, this property varies widely depending on the type of esterquat and the number and positions of the appended functional groups; therefore, one should be aware of creating strict, one-sided generalizations devoid of objectivity [6]. Because this argument is one of the cautions in this field, the question ‘what is the real relationship between structure of esterquat and its ecological profile?’ will be thoroughly discussed further in this review.
Nowadays, esterquats are being considered as a unique class of compounds with highly beneficial properties that highlight their tremendous application potential. They are much more popular than few decades earlier because of societal shift to circular economy, and efforts of saving planet. It was noted that due to potentially superior eco-toxicological profiles (particularly susceptibility to biodegradation and lower toxicity to aquatic live), esterquats are beginning to replace some QASs in both Europe and the United States [7]. Specifically, triethanolamine esterquat (TEAQ, Figure 1) has a primary energy demand (PED) of around 40 GJ/ton, whereas for most of the ”quats” this parameter is generally ~30-90% greater, 52 to 77 GJ/ton [8]. Despite the fact that esterquats are well-known, their properties can be easily designed to satisfy specific performance requirements, providing multiple promising areas for their future development, unexplored so far. Various applications of esterquats, readily described and found in the framework of this review, are summarized in Figure 2.
In 2015, the global market size of esterquats has been estimated at USD 1.35 Billion and is forecasted to grow with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 11%, during the period from 2016 to 2024 [28]. This trend also results from the current, more stringent requirements set by customers, who much more frequently select less noxious products to humans and the environment. Currently, the most popular representatives of esterquats (by volume of production) are based on triethanol amine (TEAQ), diethanol amine (DEEDMAC) or N,N,-dimethyl-3-aminopropane-1,2-diol (HEQ) (structures are shown in Figure 1) and are utilized mainly as surfactants and fabric softeners [29,30,31,32,33]. Recently, Dow Global Technologies LLC, Dow Silicones Corp, Rohm & Haas have patented an innovative fabric care product containing esterquat TEAQ and quaternary ammonium functionalized dextran polymer facilitating its deposition on the fabric [34]. Early uses of esterquats also include textile auxiliaries and dye leveling agents [3], because they enable a more effective dyeing processing operation, stabilizing the dyeing bath to achieve uniform fabric shade.
Another interesting application refers to so-called flocculants, compounds that promote aggregation of suspended particles in fluids. The growing need for flocculants in the mining industry and water treatment is currently driving the revenue growth of the flocculants market, which relies on specific group of esterquats as well [35].
Analysis of the patent databases revealed another significant use of esterquat-type compounds referring to enormous and rapidly developing market of personal care. Among various household products, esterquats of diverse compositions are used as components of creams and lotions, shampoos, conditioners, and skin care products [1,36,37]. A key aspect of novelty in these inventions is attributed to improved safety for customers and/or more benign environmental profiles compared to that of classic QASs, which are intended to be replaced. The increased interest in esterquats from the largest chemical companies, such as BASF, Henkel, Procter Gamble or Evonik serves as an indicator of their great usability and sufficient safety, which would potentially translate to their widespread commercialization and scale-up production [37,38,39,40,41].
Interestingly, the pH-labile linkages in esterquats allow their considerations as potentially useful agents for special applications in biotech industry, such as biocides (including both antiseptics and disinfectants), drug delivery vehicles, and gene therapy agents [2]. Thus, some of the systems based on esterquats were found to be suitable for systemic delivery and for intra-tumoral injection of chemotherapy into solid chemotherapy-resistant tumors. It is hypothesized that esterquats are able to form appropriate compact spherical nanoparticles when combined with siRNA and are able to deliver the siRNA to cancer cells where it induces gene silencing [42]. Recently, cationic solid lipid nanoparticles with cholesterol-mediated esterquat DEEDMAC (Figure 1) have proven to be effective in controlled release of protease inhibitor Saquinavir (Invirase®) without inducing significant endothelial toxicity, which reveals their surprisingly good biocompatibility with human brain-microvascular endothelial cells [43].
Due to the fact that the use of conventional pesticides causes many negative effects, including environmental contamination (soil, water bodies, atmosphere, living organisms at various trophic levels, etc.) and pest resistance, various initiatives have been established to minimize these events, such as the OECD Programme on Pesticides and Sustainable Pest Management [44]. Recently reported esterquats derived from commercialized herbicides (e.g., 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), dicamba, 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), or iodosulfuron-methyl (IS-M)) have proven to be an attractive replacement to off-the-shelf formulations, in terms of efficacy, safety to operator, as well as improved environmental impact [11,12,14]. The importance of this segment is justified by statistical data, according to which the global herbicides market size amounted to USD 36.93 Billion in 2021, and was anticipated to grow with CAGR of 6% during subsequent years [45].
Esterquats also exhibit a tremendous potential to be applied in other important fields, such as electrochemistry where they used in various applications, from corrosion inhibitors to energy storage media in batteries and electrochemical capacitors [27,46]. It should also be emphasized that these unique compounds are being increasingly utilized as a source of cations for the synthesis of ionic liquids (ILs) or hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA) for the synthesis of Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs), respectively. These types of systems could be appropriately designed to exhibit a lower impact on ecosystems in comparison to marketed chemicals or demonstrate superior physicochemical properties ensuring their successful application [9,12,47,48,49,50].
Despite their versatility and numerous advantages, a literature survey reveals only two mini- reviews discussing the subject of esterquats. The first one appeared in 2007 briefly summarized published reports regarding esterquats’ types, synthesis, and structural elements required for good environmental profile and briefly covered applications [1]. Obviously, more than 15 years is a sufficient period of time for certain data to become reevaluated. In the second review article, the stability of selected betaine-type esterquats in aqueous solutions was reviewed, whereas other aspects were not covered. Herein, we provide current and thorough set of data that will help design and efficiently synthesize novel esterquat-type structures. Additionally, the susceptibility to hydrolysis of both choline-type and betaine-type esterquats is thoroughly reviewed, as it is a crucial factor in terms of the majority of applications and their safety. Further sections are devoted to the analysis of the biodegradability and toxicity of esterquats, which allow chemists to design compounds that are both safer in use and do not pose a threat to the environment. In the last part of this review, the various currently known applications of esterquats as well as perspectives and future research directions regarding their development are discussed.

2. Types of Esterquats

In regards to their chemical structure, two main types of esterquats can be distinguished based on the arrangement of chemical bonds in the ester group: choline-type esterquats (esters of carboxylic acids and quaternary aminoalcohols) and betaine-type esterquats (esters of quaternary amino acids and alcohols ) [3,6], Figure 3.

2.1. Synthesis of Choline-Type Esterquats

In the last decade, biobased esterquats were extensively explored in a pursuit of nontoxic, naturally occurring and biodegradable cations, such as choline or its acylated derivatives (e.g., acetylcholine) [7,13,51]. Choline is widely known as a source of methyl groups required for various stages of animal and plant metabolism; this ion is an essential nutrient that is naturally present in food and available as a dietary supplement [52,53]. Generally, living cells require choline to preserve their structural integrity and to produce acetylcholine, an important neurotransmitter for various functions of the brain and nervous system, such as memory, emotion control, and muscle control [52,53]. The excellent eco-toxicological profile of choline-based cations along with their wide availability and relatively low price are the main factors contributing to their frequent selection for the synthesis of various derivatives, including a large group of choline analogs comprising an ester bond – esterquats [54,55,56]. In addition, there are multiple ILs and DESs [57,58,59] derived from esterquats. Generally, some ionic esterquats with melting points lower than 100 oC can be classified as ILs [14], whereas others can be used as hydrogen bond acceptors in DESs [15]. ILs and DESs share a mutual advantage, specifically the designability, which can be defined as possibility to tune their properties to the needs of an expected application. This can be done by selection of the most appropriate ions in the case of ILs or combining the proper HBA and HBD in the case of DES systems [15].
Esterquats are characterized by a diverse chemical structure, with the ester group (-O-C(O)-) located between the choline residue and a linear alkyl chain [3,60,61]. In some other instances choline cation and biologically active carboxylic acid (such as herbicide) can be bound together via formation of an ester group that serves as a linker (Figure 3) [9,47,62]. Detailed data on the synthesis of choline-type esterquats, including the list of reagents, brief procedures for product isolation and purification as well as product yields, are provided in detail in the supporting information (ESI), in the attempt to provide the sufficient information to readers who are enthusiasts of organic synthesis. Below, we summarized the general methods of their synthesis (Table 1).

2.2. Potential of Choline-Based Esterquats Synthesized from Biologically Active Compounds

2.1.1. Herbicidal Formulations

Multiple reports have revealed the successful synthesis of esterquats comprising biologically active moieties via creating an ionic bond between esterquats cations and biologically active anions [9,47]. The derivatization of biologically active compounds toward esterquats can be considered as potentially promising strategy providing access to novel, enhanced forms of already-known active ingredients.
Popular herbicides, such as 2,4-D, dicamba, and MCPA serve as an excellent example, wherein it was possible to obtain the biologically active salt form with simultaneous elimination of herbicides’ greatest weakness, volatility (please see data in Table 2) [12]. Additionally, derivatization of known herbicides toward esterquats potentially allows to modify their affinity for water and eliminate the threat of contamination of aquatic and soil ecosystems with highly water-soluble herbicides. Even more, selection of herbicidally active counterion permits a formation of “dual functional” herbicides via this approach. These “dual functional” herbicides broaden spectrum of herbicidal activity, enhance efficacy and thus diminish the possibility of emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds [9].
As was shown in Figure 4, there are several ways to insert a herbicide into esterquat structure. Formation of salts or IL from the cholinium cation and herbicidal anion introduces the herbicide via ionic bonding (Strategy A, Figure 4). In this strategy, esterquat anion is replaced with herbicidal anion via an anion exchange reaction. Such approach enables “tuning” of the physicochemical properties of the formed products while introducing additional biological activity brought about by herbicides [84,85]. The reason to use anion exchange over the acid-base reaction is to avoid issues associated with hydrolysis of an ester bond and decomposition of the cation. (The issue of hydrolysis of an ester bond in esterquats is thoroughly described in Section 4).
At the same time, adjustment of unfavorable properties of the herbicide (e.g., volatility) can be conducted through covalent modifications of the esterquat structure, similar to prodrug approach, with a formation of easily hydrolysable ester bond (Strategy B, Figure 4). Finally, a combination of salt formation and a “prodrug” strategy can be used (Strategy C, Figure 4). Table 2 illustrates the examples of prepared herbicides.

2.2.2. Other Biologically Active Systems

Esterquats provide new insights into drug delivery systems. Thus, the state-of-the-art reveals an interesting group of the dual-functional esterquats exhibiting both enhanced tissue permeation and analgesic activity and derived from carbonate and lidocaine moieties [83]. For example, the lidocaine-derived choline was linked with carbonate and fatty alcohol to obtain asymmetric gemini surfactant (Figure 5).
The carbonate moiety was chosen over “classic” ester because of its amphiphilicity which allows it to serve as a second hydrophilic head. As a result, enhanced hydrophilicity of the compounds permitted improved tissue permeation. Surprisingly, the compounds showed spontaneous self-assembly into specific microstructures, known as Janus particles [83]. This kind of agglomerates was known before to be prepared mainly from macromolecules or multi-components systems [86]. The report demonstrated that smaller organic molecules have ability to self-assemble into such systems subject to meeting certain requirements such as an existence of an aromatic group (present in lidocaine moiety) and an amphiphilic carbonate group. The lengths of alkyl chains (the spacer and the hydrophobic tail) in the molecule were not as important. Additionally, it was established that the amphiphilic carbonate groups are capable of increasing tissue permeability of the whole particles. Such systems have potential to be utilized in many fields. Because of lidocaine core and increased hydrophilicity, they exhibit unique interfacial and biological activity, and can be utilized in gene transition, drug delivery systems, etc. (Figure 6, left, structures A and B) [83].
Systems aimed to deliver targeted drug into cancer cells, based particularly on choline analogs were successfully prepared and tested as well. One of the papers described the use of MDEA esterquat (Figure 6, middle, structure C, ester of oleic acid and diisopropanoldimethylammonium methyl sulfate) as a novel nanoparticle delivery system for cytostatic drugs and small RNA fragments (abbreviated as siRNA, small interfering RNA) [42]. Specifically, upon mixing with siRNA, MDEA formed spherical compact nanoparticles able to deliver the siRNA to cancer cells for induction of gene silencing. These systems were especially effective when the esterquat was combined with 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE) phospholipid, increasing transfection efficiency (i.e., the percentage of cells transfected from cells nontransfected), to 93%, enhancing the efficiency of the therapy [42].
One more study examined anti-oxidant efficacy of sinapine-derived choline esterquats prepared from naturally occurring antioxidant sinapinic acid. The sinapine and its analogues are known to exhibit simultaneous antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, which was noted as potentially useful in the context of utilization in food preservation [56]. While authors did not point out advantages of esterquat strategy, it can be presumed that transformation of sinapine into esterquats likely enhanced aqueous solubility of compounds and hence affected release rate of active (Figure 6, right, structure D). Interestingly, it was the type of substituent that influenced antioxidant activity of the prepared derivatives. Thus, in case of hydrogen substituents (X = H, Y = H), no antioxidant activity was observed. Substitution of one or two hydrogen atoms with a methoxy group resulted in enhancement of the antioxidant properties (X = OCH3, Y = H, EC50 = 36.7 nmol; X = OCH3, Y = OCH3, EC50 = 18.1 nmol), while compound with polyphenolic ring was characterized by the highest activity (X = OH, Y = H, EC50 = 6.3 nmol). The summary of biological activity for the compounds presented in this section is covered in Table 3, below.
The studies presented above unambiguously demonstrate the versatility of esterquats in the design and synthesis of various types of multifunctional esters that can be successfully applied in the majority of industries. Practically, there is no limitation regarding the type of the biological activity that can be introduced into esterquat-based ionic pairs. Therefore, we presume that the number of similar literature reports describing this group of multifunctional compounds will be a subject of extensive studies of various research groups not only from the academic communities but also from industries exploring new resources.

2.3. Synthesis of Betaine-Type Esterquats

In recent years, scientists have begun to shift their attention from choline to betaine-type esterquats, due to the development of efficient routes of their synthesis from cost-effective reactants. Recently, it has been shown that these esterquats can be synthesized directly from inexpensive, naturally derived glycine betaine or carnitine via simple O-alkylation under mild conditions [11,14,15,87]. Such an approach allows to avoid not only the use of expensive but also toxic reagents that were required in former synthetic paths of this unique group of compounds. The simplest betaine, N,N,N-trimethylglycine, commonly known as glycine betaine, is omnipresent in living animals and plants, mainly due to its osmotic properties that prevent cell dehydration [88,89]. Both choline and glycine betaine are able to act as HBAs in the process of formation of natural deep eutectic solvents (NADESs), exhibiting tremendous potential for applications including those of an industrial scale [90,91,92].
In humans, glycine betaine acts as a methyl group donor in the synthesis of methionine from homocysteine[93]. Glycine betaine is also utilized in crop production because it accumulates in many plant species under stress, which means that this compound can serve as an excellent platform for the synthesis of various promising agrochemicals [94]. It should also be emphasized that this poorly developed byproduct of the sugar industry, which constitutes up to 8% of sugar beet molasses [95], is readily biodegradable and practically nontoxic to living organisms (acute oral LD50 for rats ∼11000 mg per kg allows classification of betaine into the 5th toxicity category according to Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)) [96]. Continuous discoveries of facile and environmentally friendly ways to access to esterified derivatives of betaine are currently a driving force for a growing interest in this type of esterquats, which also leads directly to an increase in the reported spectrum of their innovative applications. In Table 4 we provide a summary of the general methods of synthesis of betaine-based esterquats (detailed data regarding the synthesis is available in ESI).

2.4. Potential of Betaine-Based Esterquats Synthesized from Biologically Active Compounds

Analogously to choline-derived esterquats, multifunctional, biologically active esterified forms of betaine are obtained via the anion exchange reaction routes [11,14,85]. Theoretically, hydrolysable ester bond in betaine derivatives can be utilized in drug delivery systems, wherein esterquats represent a platform for a controlled release of actives. However, thus far a literature analysis did not reveal any report on this subject.
Esterquats with a betaine-type cation (Table 5) have been successfully used for the synthesis of a new generation of agrochemicals. As a result, popular herbicides (e.g., iodosulfuron methyl and dicamba) have been successfully combined with alkyl betainate cations (Figure 7), where they constitute a biologically active anion. The cation in these ion pairs can be an excellent tool for modifying properties of parent herbicides, such as aqueous solubility or surface activity, while exhibiting low impact on the environment (hydrolysable ester bond facilitates the decomposition and degradation of such quaternary ammonium cations in the environment) [11]. Interestingly, in the case of some alkyl betainate cations (particularly wherein alkyl chain contains ten carbon atoms), the cation itself cannot be considered as an inert affecting only the physicochemical properties, but as a phytotoxic substance, acting synergistically with the herbicidal anion [14]. Bearing in mind the low price and availability of glycine betaine which is a by-product in the sugar manufacturing process, the interest in this betaine as a starting material for novel, multifunctional and environment-friendly esterquats will likely intensify in the coming years.

3. Susceptibility to Hydrolysis of Choline-Type and Betaine-Type Esterquats

Two types of esterquats (choline-type and betaine-type), exhibit different physicochemical properties [3,6]. As demonstrated in Figure 8, the presence of an ester bond within esterquats structure makes them susceptible to hydrolysis, and these compounds are even more reactive than conventional esters [55,61,75,76]. The quaternary positively charged nitrogen atom in betaines pulls electron density from the neighboring atoms, resulting in carbonyl carbon to become more electrophilic.
As a result, the hydrolysis of betaine esters is strongly pH-dependent. Higher electrophilicity of carbonyl carbon atom provides betaine esterquats with good stability under acidic conditions but makes them more susceptible to hydroxyl attack [3,6,9,16,115]. Hence, under alkaline conditions, the rate of hydrolysis is higher than that of esters in general; moreover, they hydrolyze at a significant rate by the base-catalyzed mechanism even at neutral pH. In an acidic environment, betaine esters are more stable than conventional esters[5,9,56,79,80].
The rate of hydrolysis is also dependent on the esterquat structure as well as on intermolecular interactions between ester and quaternary ammonium groups. In the case of choline-type esterquats, the distance between these groups are longer than for structurally similar derivatives of betaine. Moreover, in choline-type esterquats, nitrogen atoms are additionally separated from carbonyl carbon by oxygen. Therefore, the specific repulsions in betaine esters between the positively charged nitrogen and carbonyl carbon lead to destabilization of the ground state, and in effect, such compounds tend to be relatively more stable in acidic conditions but hydrolyze more rapidly when the conditions are basic [5,16,56,77,79].
Gemini-type esterquats tend to be more susceptible to hydrolysis than their monocationic analogues [3,6,99]. It should also be noted that the orthoesters demonstrate the opposite tendency in terms of their susceptibility to hydrolysis, due to the lack of a carbonyl group in the cation, hence an increase in the pH of the solution results in the respective increase of stability [76].
Another important factor affecting the rate of hydrolysis of esterquats is the temperature of the solution. Obviously, a rise in temperature naturally increases the reaction rate, although for esterquats its impact remains relatively low in wide spectrum of temperatures [121]. However, the rate of hydrolysis is also negatively influenced by the ionic strength of the solution. The addition of salts such as sodium chloride may significantly slow the process and make esterquats more stable to hydrolysis [16].
It was also established that hydrolysis of the esterquats in a basic environment often tends to accelerate the values of critical micelle concentration (CMC), which can be attributed to micellar catalysis. This phenomenon is explained by the increase in the concentration of hydroxyl ions near the micelles, caused by the occurrence of electrostatic forces between those ions and positive charges on the micelles’ surfaces [3,6,99]. Furthermore, it should be taken into consideration that the products of such hydrolysis might exhibit surface active properties (such as long-chain alcohols). This would result in a reduction in CMC and a simultaneous increase in the hydrolysis rate. On the other hand, incorporation of the products of hydrolysis into those micelles slows hydrolysis due to the limited attraction of hydroxyl anions associated with dilution of charges on the micelle surface. This charge dilution results in a lesser increase in pH, therefore decreasing the rate of hydrolysis. However, this effect was found to be negligible compared to the reduction of CMC [3,6,99]. Another interesting factor affecting the rate of hydrolysis is the occurrence of side-chain groups between quaternary ammonium and ester groups. They can substantially decrease the rate of hydrolysis of such esterquats due to their hydrophobic nature [6].
Furthermore, many reports have revealed that esterquats (such as gemini-type cations containing both a carbonate linkage and a dodecyl group) can be effectively hydrolyzed with the use of various enzymes, such as lipase (Figure 9) [5,80]. This means that under conditions when these compounds are known to be stable, it is still possible to influence their decomposition rate by using biotechnological tools.
The hydrolysis reaction depends on the initial esterquat structure. We have identified the core structures in the Figure 10, below. The hydrolysis reaction generally proceeds under various conditions; hydrolysis rate of esterquats and conditions employed are listed in Table 6.

4. Biological Tests

Esterquats, as a novel generation of active ingredients, exhibit significant potential to commercialization as a direct replacement of currently used compounds. Therefore, they can eventually end up in the environment, which includes mainly soil and watercourses. Hence, a comprehensive environmental risk assessment should be conducted to evaluate their toxicity toward living organisms as well as biodegradation in various conditions [1].

4.1. Biodegradation of Esterquats

To study the fate of esterquats in the environment, various biodegradation studies have been conducted. The collected data from the available reports are summarized in Table 7. It should be noted that biodegradation tests have not been performed for all esterquats described in the literature. This fact reveals a serious gap in crucial data that directly hinders their potential commercialization. Among the presented studies, standard protocols supported by The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have been utilized, in particular OECD 310 (“Headspace Test”, conducted by evaluation of carbon dioxide produced by microbial action) and various variations of OECD 301 tests such as OECD 301 A ("DOC Die-away test", conducted by measuring the change in Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC)), OECD B (conducted by measuring the production of carbon dioxide (CO2) during its degradation), OECD 301 C (conducted by respirometry through measuring oxygen consumption), OECD 301 D (“closed bottle test”, conducted by respirometry through measuring amount of dissolved oxygen), OECD 301 E (conducted by evaluation of dissolved organic carbon) and OECD 301 F (conducted by manometric respirometry through measuring oxygen consumption) [3,12,19,60,68,80,81,110]. In these tests, the biodegradation percentage is obtained as the quotient of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and theoretical oxygen demand (ThOD) required to oxidize a compound to its final oxidation products [122].
In other cases, OECD 310 protocol, also called Ready Biodegradability Test, or carbon dioxide method, was used. The test of the level of biodegradation is based on the analysis of CO2 evolution resulting from the ultimate aerobic biodegradation of the test substance [123]. Interestingly, a direct comparison of the biodegradation test via OECD 301 C with other protocols proposed by OECD (OECD 301 A – F and OECD 310) was conducted in 2013 by Kayashima et al. [122,123,124] and revealed that substances evaluated as “not readily biodegradable” according to guideline 301 C might be “readily biodegradable” when tested via OECD 301 F and OECD 310 methods. Moreover, all selected tests applied to evaluate the biodegradability of the synthesized esterquats were based on anaerobic degradation with the use of activated sludge isolated from water plants, while potential biodegradation of herbicides in the environment will require significantly different microbiota.
For instance, as it was noted in a recent publication, research focused on microbial biodegradation of QASs in water and soil revealed substantial differences depending on the applied environment. The benzalkonium cation was readily mineralized in water, whereas the herbicidal 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetate (MCPA) anion was able to fully degrade only in the soil environment [125]. These results indicated that esterquats comprising herbicidal anions should be tested by using microbiota isolated from different niches, where herbicides might occur due to applied agricultural practices.
As presented in Table 7 and Figure 11, the highest biodegradability level, up to 85 – 95% after 28 days, was demonstrated by monocationic esterquats with chloride and bromide anions (Table 7, Entries 20, 22 and 35) On the other hand, the lowest biodegradability (20%) occurred in the case of gemini surfactants composed of one oxycarbonyl group in the linker structure between two nitrogen groups (Table 7, Entry 29).
It was also shown that combining herbicidal anions with esterquat cations may lead to the formation of compounds with enhanced biodegradability compared to MCPA free acid. In this study, the greatest biodegradability level was demonstrated by salt with di(tallowoyloxyethyl)dimethylammonium cation and MCPA anion whereas 2-[methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium salt with the same anion was significantly less biodegradable (Table 7, Entry 21: 63% vs. Entry 19: 29%) [12,51,126]. Obviously, such a scarce number of available results clearly demonstrates that there is still a substantial lack of data considering the biodegradation of esterquats incorporating herbicidal anions in their structures. Nonetheless, in the case of such structurally complex ionic pairs, it is recommended to analyze the decomposition of both ions separately rather than providing the sum of biodegradation rate for whole compound. Such action allows to reveal true environmental impact of each of the biologically active ions that were combined to form an esterquat molecule.
Interestingly, analysis of reported biodegradation studies revealed that the biodegradability of esterquats gradually decreases with an increase in the number of methylene groups between the oxycarbonyl group and the quaternary ammonium group, even when these surfactants possessed the same number of carbon atoms in the lipophilic part. The compounds with different type of cations are separated into A, B, C, D, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M classes based on their structural features (Figure 12).
Gemini-type compounds (A) with two methylene groups between the oxycarbonyl group and the ammonium group at the linker moiety presented higher biodegradation compared to the analog with four methylene groups (Table 7, Entry 5: 58% vs. Entry 11: 50%) [60]. Also, for most types of polycationic esterquats, biodegradation increased with increase of the alkyl chain length connected to the nitrogen. Thus, for the gemini-type compound F elongation of two alkyl chains from decyl to dodecyl increases biodegradability from 60% to 70% (Table 7, Entries 24 and 25) [80]. Similar results were demonstrated for other tested tricationic esterquats (M) (Table 7, Entry 40: 41%; Entry 41: 42%; Entry 42: 52%) [110]. However, after reaching fourteen carbon atoms within the alkyl chain in esterquat F, the biodegradation was found to slightly decrease (Table 7, Entry 26: 60%) [80].
It should be noted that conventional gemini-type cations derived from hydrolytically cleavable moieties, such as ester or amide bonds, show almost no signs of biodegradation (pentane-1,5-bis(N,N-dimethyl-N-decylammonium) diiodide: 10%; pentane-1,5-bis(N,N-dimethyl-N-dodecylammonium) diiodide: 5%; pentane-1,5-bis(N,N-dimethyl-N-tetradecylammonium) diiodide: <5%) [80]. However, data for their analogues comprising at least one ester bond (F and G) revealed an affinity of such compounds to biodegradation in the OECD 301 C test that was several times greater (Table 7, Entry 27: 30%; Entry 28: 45%; Entry 29: 20% Entry 31: 25%) than that for conventional gemini-type cations [60,80].
Generally, it is an extremely challenging task to compare biodegradability results for esterquats containing cations characterized by such diverse chemical structures. Nonetheless, a thorough analysis of available studies shows that the alkyl chain length in the cation has a significant influence on their biodegradation independently on the applied testing method. Generally, alkyl chain elongation facilitates the affinity of compounds for microbial decomposition. It has also been established that increasing the number of methylene groups between ester bond and the nitrogen atom causes a decrease in the biodegradability rate. Standard procedures developed by the OECD are being applied, however, their diversity makes it impossible to compare them directly. Moreover, due to the selection of different microorganisms, the results of the biodegradation test for herbicidally active esterquats might be unreliable taking into consideration their potential application. Therefore, it is crucial to develop novel standard procedures for evaluating the biodegradability of esterquats, particularly for substances with potential usage as herbicides.

4.2. Toxicity of Esterquats

Toxicity testing is indispensable for the overall sustainability characterization of chemicals as it ensures the responsible development and use of substances, safeguarding human health, preventing environmental harm. That is why before the introduction of any chemical into the ecosystem, thorough toxicity studies should be performed in order to assess its potential impact, risk and possible interactions with the environment. Unfortunately, toxicity tests are rarely applied for the majority of newly synthesized esterquats. The situation is further complicated by the fact that there are no unified standard procedures for the purpose, and only incidental studies have been performed. In the literature we can find a scarce data regarding specified, more sophisticated toxicity tests, such as hemocyte-based bioassay. In this context, choline esters with middle-length straight alkyl chain and lactate or levulinate anion have shown negligible toxicity, but the lack of data for a broader group of esterquats makes it impossible to draw deeper conclusions [127]. Tests such as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC [18,80,81]) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC [47,48]) are the most common parameters to evaluate the interactions of esterquats with microorganisms that are present in the environment. In some antimicrobial studies, the inhibition zone diameter (IZD [20,66]) was determined and half maximal effective concentration (EC50 [47,56]) tests were also conducted; however, such data are scarce. As presented in Table 8, toxicity testing of esterquats have been performed on common bacteria and fungi. There is still a lack of information regarding the toxicity of esterquats for other organisms, such as mammals, fish, shellfish, crustaceans or algae. However, available data [12,21,110,128] indicate that they generally follow the same trends as conventional QASs [129].
Due to the different conditions of the performed tests and the manner of presenting the obtained toxicity data, it is difficult to provide indisputable conclusions. However, the analysis of structurally different esterquats reveals information on how different functional groups and the structural features present in esterquats affect their antimicrobial properties. Analysis of collected data presented in Table 8 revealed that the length of the alkyl chain has a significant effect on the toxicity of the tested esterquats, which was found to increase with the elongation of the chain up to a certain amount of carbon atoms (usually between C12-C14) [18,106]. It is hypothesized that the presence of long alkyl groups contributes to the high hydrophobicity of the cation and facilitates its sorption onto cells, which ultimately results in the disruption of cellular membranes [130]. Further elongation of the alkyl chain usually decreases the solubility of the tested compound in water and results in lowering their toxicity [106,131]. This phenomenon was first noted for conventional QASs and described repeatedly as a ‘cutoff’ effect [132].
The size of the spacer between the ammonium groups might also exhibit a notable effect on activity toward various microbes. Thus, gemini-type esterquat with two methylene groups between the oxycarbonyl group and the ammonium group at the linker moiety showed slightly lower activities (expressed as MIC) compared to the compound of similar structure with three methylene groups (Table 8, Entry 27: 22 µg/mL vs. Entry 28: 10 µg/mL, against E. coli) [18].
A direct comparison of the values noted for esterquats with their alkyl analogs, such as N,N'-bis(dodecyldimethyl)-1,2-ethanediammonium dibromide or benzalkonium chloride showed a 10- to 20-fold decrease in activity in the case of compounds comprising an ester group [106]. This is illustrated by the MIC values against E.coli, where esterquats exhibited MIC values above 10 µg/mL (e.g., Table 8, Entry 82: 11.7 µg/mL and Entry 90: >28.7 µg/mL), compared to as low as 0.62 µg/mL for N,N'-bis(dodecyldimethyl)-1,2-ethanediammonium dibromide and 2.6 µg/mL for benzalkonium chloride [106].
Interestingly, it was also established that Gram-negative bacteria exhibited significantly greater resistance to esterquats with chloride, bromide and iodide anions than Gram-positive bacteria. Thus, MIC values for Gram-negative E. coli was found to be 400 µg/mL (Table 8, Entry 29 and Entry 33) whereas for Gram-positive S. aureus the value was determined to be 200 and 5 µg/mL, respectively (Table 8, Entries 29 and 33).
The different bactericidal activities of esterquats can be explained by the absence of an outer membrane and the occurrence of negatively charged teichoic acid molecules within a thick peptidoglycan layer on the surface of S. aureus. This makes the surface of Gram-positive bacterial cell membranes more attractive to positively charged esterquats and more likely to be damaged compared to Gram-negative representatives. Moreover, the presence of a number of small channels of porins within the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria may be helpful in blocking the entrance of quaternary ammonium compounds into the bacterial cell, making Gram-negative bacteria more resistant [130].
In the case of esterquats comprising an herbicidally active anion in their structure, the effect of increasing toxicity with alkyl chain length as well as the subsequent cutoff effect (usually for alkyls exceeding C12-C14) was also noted. Thus, MIC values for esterquats with different alkyl chain length followed the order C14H29 >> C10H21 > C12H25 against E.coli (33.8 >> 15.5 > 8.1 µg/mL, as shown in Table 8, Entry 46, 44 and 45, respectively) [47].
It was also established that the toxicity of esterquats with herbicidal anions is higher by two or three orders of magnitude compared to conventional herbicides (e.g., Table 8, Entry 47 - E. coli: EC50 16.3 µg/mL, (µg/mL) compared to EC50 of dicamba + 2,4-D acids found to be 5.5 µg/mL [47]. Further analyses performed with other herbicides indicated a similar trend, and the high toxicity of the studied esterquats has been associated with the significant toxicity exhibited by the amphiphilic cation used in the synthesis [47].
Analysis of the data collected from various studies regarding esterquats revealed how the presence of different functional groups in the cation may affect their toxicity. First, it was confirmed that the length of the alkyl chain has a crucial influence on the functioning and development of microorganisms, particularly bacteria and fungi. Moreover, the distance between the oxycarbonyl group and the nitrogen atom in the linker of gemini-type esterquats may also contribute to increased toxicity. It was also confirmed that esterquats exhibit a slightly lower toxic effect on microorganisms compared to their analogues deprived of an ester bond, however, further research is still required in this field. In the case of esterquats with an herbicidal anion, it was established that a high level of toxicity is mainly caused by the cationic part of esterquats rather than the herbicidal anion. A literature survey also revealed that data presented from different studies are inconsistent: different research groups utilize different tests as well as different bacterial strains to evaluate toxicity, or the obtained results are being presented with the use of different units. Therefore, standardization of protocols and guidelines is required to ease the comparison of collected results from various experiments, but due to hydrolysis toxicity can decrease by orders of magnitude after couple of days in water environment [128].
In the context of the above results indicating that esterquats can have a significant effect on cellular function, the question should be asked whether they can also induce hemolysis or pose safety concerns for human cells. Unfortunately, there is no sufficient amount of data undoubtedly indicating that these group of compounds are practically safe to humans in direct contact. Nonetheless, Para et al., established that there was no significant increase in necrotic cells in either control or surfactant-containing wells at concentrations between 0.01 and 0.1 mM, thus suggesting that both tested surfactants (choline dodecylate esters with bromide anion) with or without lysozyme are safe for application on human cells at those concentrations [6]. Furthermore, other researchindicate that addition of suitable groups e.g. hydroxyl or methyl ester at the end of the alkyl chain of QASs greatly reduces their cytotoxicity [133]. However, in the light of potential application of esterquats, as replacement for other surface active QASs it is strongly recommended to fill the gap and provide more data regarding potential impact on this compound on human health.
Figure 13. Structures of different type of cations.
Figure 13. Structures of different type of cations.
Preprints 103940 g013

5. Applications

5.1. Surfactants, Emulsifiers and Foam Stabilizers

The largest areas for applications of esterquats are as surfactants, emulsifiers and foam stabilizers (examples are provided in Figure 14, structures of the types A, B, and C, respectively).
The literature survey confirms the potential of using esterquats as biodegradable surfactants that can be produced from raw materials of natural origin as part of a circular economy. For example, amphiphilic esterquats made from glycine betaine have been used to obtain cationic surfactants with readily biodegradable anions derived from methanesulfonic acid (Figure 14, structures of the type A) [21,115].
For surfactants, the main physicochemical parameter is a critical micelle concentration (CMC) that defines their surface activity and self-assembled aggregation. The overview of CMC values for the esterquats A confirms their effectiveness as surfactants (CMC 0.1 – 1.2 mmol/L), and demonstrates dependence on the length of alkyl chains [115].
Among the synthesized organic salts, two compounds containing 18 carbon atoms in the alkyl chain of the cation (Figure 14 A, R1 = C18H35 and C18H37) deserve special attention. The first one was characterized by excellent emulsifying properties, due to the presence of a double bond in the aforementioned chain. The subsequent tests qualified this compound as a readily biodegradable substance (reaching 60% degradation within 28 days), suggesting it to be an extremely promising candidate for the use in industry. When this compound was tested for its susceptibility to hydrolysis, it was established that the compound is stable under acidic conditions, and exhibits a high degree decomposition under alkaline pH [115]. This important feature allows for possible control of the rate of decay of said esterquat and thus minimize the risk of its potential accumulation in the environment.
The stability of the gemini surfactants containing either a three-carbon or a six-carbon spacer (Figure 14, structures of the type B, n = 1, R2 = CH2 or C4H8) was compared with their monomeric counterparts (Figure 14, structures of the type C). The results indicated that mono-esterquats are less susceptible to alkaline hydrolysis than their gemini analogues. Intriguingly, a gemini surfactant containing C9 alkyl chain and three carbon atom spacer demonstrated the greatest efficiency in the application as a foam stabilizer. Its degree of decomposition under the influence of biotic factors did not allow for its recognition as readily biodegradable, as opposed to the similar monomeric derivative [19]. The team of Tehrani-Bagha et al. also studied susceptibility to biodegradation of this type of compounds which was established to be lower for gemini-type compounds (60% biodegradation was achieved after 35-40 days) than for the similar monomeric derivatives. Nonetheless, taking into account the results of decomposition under the influence of biotic factors and the excellent surface activity parameters, the possibility of implementing the discussed compounds as commercial surfactants is highly probable [3].
Another potential industrial application was demonstrated recently with the use of an interesting group of diester-bonded cationic gemini surfactants (Figure 14 D, R1 = C12H25, C14H29 and C16H33). Compounds tested in this study were found to possess excellent surface-active properties and low critical micelle concentration (CMC) values. Additionally, the collected results revealed their significant antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Undoubtedly, these findings open up a new path toward multifunctional compounds, such as cleaning agents enriched with targeted antibacterial (disinfectants) or cytotoxic activity (cytostatic drugs) [20].
Table S3 (provided in ESI) contains molar masses of chosen esterquats, their CMC values, and surface tension at CMC. Generally, CMC values vary from 0.00098 g/L for gemini esterquats to 18.5 g/L for monomeric derivatives (Table S3 in ESI) [15,20]. The influence of the structure of esterquats on CMC values is analogous to typical QASs, which means that the elongation of the alkyl chain results in lowering of this parameter. Gemini compounds are characterized by lower values compared to those of monomeric compounds comprising the same alkyl chain in the structure of the cation. Interestingly, the structure of the anion can significantly affect the CMC as well; for example, the exchange of bromide anions to chloride results in decreasing CMC values orders of magnitude (Table S3 in ESI, Entries 25 and 27 as examples for choline-type monomeric esterquats and 135-137 and 139-141 or 131 and 139 for betaine-type gemini esterquats). It should also be emphasized that the elongation of the spacer between quaternary nitrogen atoms in gemini esterquats was found to marginally affect their surface properties (Table S3 in ESI, Entries 7 and 10, 31-38 for choline type esterquats, and 104-112 for betaine-type esterquats).
Also important for surfactants is their foam properties (e.g., foam stability, foam expansion ratio), as they have a significant impact on their practical application; therefore, these parameters were also studied. Foam expansion is defined as the ratio of the volume of foam formed to a volume of liquor (liquid) used to generate the foam whereas foam stability is the time that foam will maintain its initial properties as generated. The foam height and foam stability of several cationic gemini surfactants (Table S3 in ESI, Entries 66-74) are summarized in Figure 15. It was established that as the length of the hydrophobic chain increases, the surfactants become more abundant in foam, and the foam stability increases. Additionally, compound ‘h’ in Figure 15 showed the best foam height compared to cationic gemini surfactants that have other spacer lengths, but its foam stability was found to be relatively poor [18].
Numerous scientific patents disclose the use of esterquats as components of creams and lotions, shampoos, conditioners or various other skin cosmetics. Beside improving their stability, esterquats have also been proposed as safer replacement for non-natural origin ingredients such as silicones. Due to rising awareness of the customers and their growing requirements this action is part of the modern the marketing campaign promoting eco friendliness [38,39,134,135]. The esterquats possess various functions in the formulations, acting as emulsifiers (for example Henkel’s TEAQs or Colgate Palmolive’s DEEDMACs presented in Figure 2), potentially also as fragrance carrier or precursor, or intensifiers of other compounds’ effects.
The potential to facilitate dispersion of solid cosmetic ingredients in lower temperatures or remaining in liquid state at room temperature can also be considered as one of their most important functions, as it may reduce the energy and solvent consumption [39,40,134,135,136,137]. Silicone-based compositions can obviously provide desired properties, such as smooth and soft feeling, although, analogously as in the case of the conventional QASs, petrochemical emollients or mineral oils, huge efforts are being put into reducing their use. Thus, products derived from natural substances are being increasingly explored and utilized in products, even despite providing less beneficial effects compared to more toxic, old representatives. For this reason, there is still large scientific gap, which impels the need for future improvement and development of products containing esterquats as replacements for other chemicals [37,39,135].
In the case of the hair care products, compositions containing esterquats were also proven to be used in conditioners, as detangling and antistatic agents, leaving hair easier to comb. Such compositions can also provide benefits in lengthening the styling hold and frizz control. Additionally, some esterquats provide increased hair shining, flexibility and elasticity. They are used particularly in combinations with betaine, non-esterquat cationic surfactants, specific amidoamines (monoamides of alkyldiamines) or glycerin esters [37,39,40,136,137].

5.2. Flocculants, Flotation Collecttors and Fabric Softeners

An interesting application of unsaturated-functionalized esterquats was achieved by their polymerization. In effect, a number of compounds were successfully obtained, in which the cation is shown in Figure 16 (A), and the anions were as follows: benzoate, salicylate, acesulfame and saccharinate. The synthesized compounds were effective as flocculants of negatively charged particles, e.g., in the case of various yeast suspensions. The tested esterquats were more efficient than the applied reference cationic polymers without an ester bond. It should be noted that the newly reported functionalized advanced polymeric materials have also been classified as a unique group of poly(ionic liquids) (PILs). It is noteworthy that their synthesis did not require the use of solvents (except for the anion exchange stage), purification or drying, which is an inherent step in methods of preparation of “standard” flocculants [22].
Flotation is an industrially important technique that relies on differences in surface properties of different minerals to achieve separation of hydrophobic materials from hydrophilic. A novel quaternary ammonium surfactant called M-302, shown in Figure 16 (B, n=4), containing ester bonds and hydrocarbon tails was proposed as cationic collector for iron ore flotation. Generally, the flotation collectors are naturally attracted to metallic surfaces making them more hydrophobic. However, collected results revealed that M-302 tended to adsorb on the surfaces of quartz more than that of hematite, and in effect their separation was significantly facilitated [35]. At the condition of natural pulp pH (7.38), the starch dosage of 8.0 mg/L, and M-302 dosage of 20.0 mg/L, quartz and hematite could be separated effectively with 93% recovery. Interestingly M-302 is a readily biodegradable compound, which promotes consideration of its application on a commercial scale.
Introduced in the early 1980s as a response to potentially environmentally harmful fabric rinsing agents, esterquats are also being widely used in textile industry as fabric softeners. They improve the quality of materials, making them more pleasant to touch and smell. In addition, they affect the overall strength and durability of textiles. Because of the presence of easily cleavable ester bond in their structure, esterquats are more susceptible to degradation, which minimizes the risk of skin allergies or other dermal issues. For this reason, esterquats are excellent fabric rinsing agents’ alternatives that met more stringent requirements established as a result of intensified pro-ecological initiatives [1,29].

5.3. Pharmaceuticals and Antiseptics

The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most promising area for novel and innovative applications of esterquats. These compounds exhibit various biological activities, while presence of labile ester bond makes them attractive candidates for drug delivery. Thus, gemini surfactants derived from choline (Figure 17, structures of type A) are effective biocides. Data on biocidal activity showed that the elongation of the alkyl chain of the surfactant enhances this feature [73].
Betaine ester-shell functionalized hyperbranched polyethylenimines comprising multiple ester bonds (Figure 17, structures of type B) are not only highly antibacterial but are able to effectively store large amounts of antibiotics and antiseptics. Breaking down under a weakly alkaline conditions (pH = 7-9) allows the controlled release of actives trapped inside base-labile betaine ester-shell. Moreover, these ester-shell functionalized hyperbranched polyethylenimines obtained from long-chain alkyl bromoacetate proved to be compatible with organic resins and could be employed in production of antibacterial fibers and coatings [17].
In a study performed by Lundberg et al., surface-active betaine esters (Figure 17, structures of type C, where n = 1, R1 = C10H21, C12H25, C14H29, C18H35) have been proposed as candidates for implementation in the field of pharmaceutical applications brought about by the presence of a readily hydrolysable linkage in their structure and the formation of harmless degradation products. In the framework of the research, the phase behavior of two systems was investigated: dodecyl betainate - dodecanol - betaine hydrochloride - D2O and dodecyl betainate - phosphatidylcholine (PC) - ethanol - D2O. The results presented in this study indicated that the cationic betaine esters derived from fatty alcohols are a class of compounds possessing both hydrophobic and hydrophilic portions with potential use in drug delivery, particularly when formulated with PC or other lipid excipients [23]. Additionally, structurally similar gemini hexylbetainates were used to increase the availability of the antidepression drug, imipramine through the formation of micelles [138].
According to another report, appropriately designed derivatives of QASs and lysosomotropic substances (QDLS) (Figure 17, structures of type D) simultaneously demonstrate surface active properties and biological activity. Because living organisms constitute an electrolyte-rich environment, which in turn strongly affects the properties of QDLS, the aim of this research was to analyze their adsorption processes in air-electrolyte systems. The sources of electrolytes were various sodium salts: NaCl, NaBr, NaClO3, and the measurements were carried out at two temperatures: 21.0 °C and 36.6 °C. It was concluded that the addition of salt along with the increase in temperature contributes to an improvement in the surface activity and accelerates the process of QDLS adsorption at the air-electrolyte interface. However, it should be noted that the observed enhancement in adsorption properties depended on both the type of utilized anion and its concentration [24].
A thorough analysis of a series of monocationic betaine-based esterquats (Figure 17, structures of type E), revealed their interesting properties originating from the presence of an ester bond. Their antimicrobial effect as well as the rate of their hydrolysis in aqueous solution increased upon elevation of pH. Moreover, the bactericidal activity of such compounds increased with the length of the alkyl chain up to 18 carbon atoms. Bearing in mind that the products of hydrolysis are human metabolites, these esterquats could be employed as disinfectants, and successfully utilized not only in the food industry but also directly on the surface of the human body [16].
Recently, a direct relationship between the structure of dicationic surface active esterquats (Figure 17, structures of type F and G) and their biological activity was analyzed in experiments, wherein erythrocytes were utilized as a simple model of the biological membrane. The results showed that depending on the applied concentration as well as the esterquat chemical structure, the osmotic resistance of erythrocytes can be influenced in different ways. At sufficiently high concentrations, the membrane is destroyed, ultimately causing the breakdown of red blood cells. Surfactants containing 10, 12 and 14 carbon atoms in the alkyl chain and structurally larger linkers were characterized by higher activity. This feature may become useful in designing the structure of new compounds with a pharmaceutically desired activity [25].
Interestingly, as shown in Figure 18, glycine betaine can also be used in clean technology as the finishing reagent for the preparation of antibacterial fabrics. In this unique approach, the reactive carboxyl group of betaine binds to the cellulosic fabrics via esterification, while the quaternary ammonium moiety exerts an antibacterial effect. The obtained fabric exhibited excellent antibacterial and anti-serum protein adsorption capacities without compromising its wearing comfort properties, such as flexibility or vapor transmissibility [10].

5.4. Agrochemicals

In the area exploring the subject of agrochemicals, a group of choline-type QASs that possess an ester bond in their structure and anions derived from herbicides belonging to the group of synthetic auxins (2,4-D, MCPA, MCPP and dicamba) (Figure 19, structures of type A and B) were successfully synthesized and characterized. Such esterquats possess generally high thermal stability over a wide temperature range. In effect, the potential mobility of the substances and their drift to neighboring agricultural lands is significantly reduced compared to esterified forms of the analogous herbicides, which are deprived of the ionic bond. Performed field and greenhouse tests demonstrated that some of these new forms of herbicides exhibited high activity against dicotyledonous weeds, in some cases exceeding the effectiveness of commercial preparations. Due to notably high efficiency, they can be applied at much lower doses, which additionally contributes to minimization of the risk of environmental pollution [12].
Interestingly, the ester bond was successfully utilized for the synthesis of functionalized esterquats, which possess a biologically active moiety incorporated intentionally into the cation (Figure 19, structures of type C is example of esterquat with incorporated MCPA structure into cation). In 2016, Piotrowska et al. described esterquats, in which choline cations were linked with two selective herbicides (2,4-D and MCPA) [26]. The design of such unique structures originates from previous reports revealing that ester forms of such phenoxy acids can be much more active than their non-esterified counterparts. However, they exhibited relatively high volatility, established as their greatest weakness. This weakness was eliminated when esterquats were used in formulations, mainly due to the presence of ionic bonds that are responsible for the substantial reduction of vapor pressure [13]. This concept was further developed by the use of ion exchange reactions, wherein choline-type cations functionalized with appropriate herbicides were combined with structurally identical or other herbicidally active anions. In effect, the obtained new active forms exhibited the potential for synergy or a broadened spectrum of activity, which in turn also is able to minimize the escalating current phenomenon of herbicide-resistant weeds [9].
Recently, alkyl betainate cations (Figure 19, structures of type D) were combined with an anion exhibiting herbicidal activity, commercially known as iodosulfuron methyl. It was proven that these esterquats are characterized by a lower potential for bioaccumulation or migration to groundwater than the commercial preparation of this herbicide. The subsequent greenhouse tests performed on the winter oilseed rape at an extremely low dose of active ingredient (10 g ha-1) confirmed the excellent biological activity of the esterquats, which was statistically comparable to that of commercial preparation as a reference. These findings make them an attractive, more environmentally friendly, replacement for known forms of sulfonylurea-based herbicides [11].
In 2022, Stachowiak et al. proved that betaine-based esterquats (Figure 19, structures of type D) comprising bromide or dicamba anions show phytotoxic effects toward white mustard in a stage of 4–6 leaves. However, it should be noted that the plant growth inhibiting effect depended on the length of the alkyl substituent, and in some cases, the esterquats used outperformed applied reference commercial substances. Moreover, newly synthesized compounds presented high herbicidal activity without the utilization of any other additives. This fact is important in light of the search for substitutes for commercial herbicides relying on the use of biodegradable materials of natural origin. Additionally, the authors of this research established that the cation in esterquats should not be regarded only as an inert surface-active agent but rather as the moiety that can substantially influence the development of terrestrial plants itself. However, as shown in Figure 20, the biological response is highly dependent on the length of the alkyl chain in the cation [14].

5.5. Materials in Electrochemistry

Chami et al. also proposed the application of esterquats in the field of electrochemistry, specifically Figure 21, structures of type A (n=2, R1=C11H23 R2= CH2) and B (n=2, R1=C11H23 R2= C12H25). The evaluation of the results obtained after examining their behavior with various electrochemical techniques, surface characterization and quantum chemistry calculations allowed them to establish their positive effect on the process of iron corrosion inhibition in 1 M hydrochloric acid solution. The Tafel curves indicated a decrease in the corrosion current density with the addition of different concentrations of both inhibitors. However, it has been proven that gemini-compounds (Figure 21, structures of type A) are more efficient than the analogous monocationic compounds (Figure 21, structures of type B). Studies of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) have also shown that the compounds inhibit iron corrosion in the process of adsorption of surfactant molecules on the iron surface. Experimental studies confirmed the validity of theoretical considerations and confirmed that compounds A are good corrosion inhibitors [46].
Recently, biodegradable betaine-based aprotic ionic liquids from renewable natural resources (Figure 21, structures of type C) have found application as effective absorbents for SO2. The study showed that one of them, containing an alkyl chain consisting of 4 carbon atoms, can maintain the high absorption capacity and the rapid absorption rates for even 25 cycles. The electrochemical windows of the betaine-based ILs used in this paper were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry on a glassy-carbon electrode. Evidently, all of the measured ILs possessed relatively wide electrochemical windows, ranging up to 2.9–4.3 V [139].
The quaternary betaine-type ammonium salt (Figure 21, structures of type C) on AA2024-T3 in 0.01 mol/L NaOH solution was investigated using, among others, the weight loss method (WLM) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Interestingly, the tested molecules proved to be effective corrosion inhibitors achieving high protection efficacy (70%-99%). In addition, analyzed compound was proven to be a mixed type inhibitor that mainly inhibits the anodic corrosion reaction [140].
LiFePO4 batteries, mainly used in hybrid and electric cars, are a longer-lasting and safer variant of lithium-ion batteries. In addition to high current efficiency, they are also characterized by a long service life. Studies performed by Pan et al. focused on the search for electrolytes for such batteries to increase their stability and safety. In effect, the designed and newly obtained piperidinium-based ester-functionalized ionic liquid, characterized by a low melting point, low viscosity and good thermal stability, enabled the achievement of an electrochemical window as wide as 6 V. Additionally, the tested system also demonstrated excellent cycle efficiency, which undoubtedly proves that other esterquats, such as choline-type or betaine-type esterquats, exhibit excellent potential to be successfully used as electrolytes in lithium-ion batteries in the near future [27].

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

Many years of intensive studies on choline-type and betaine-type esterquats, as unique representatives of quaternary ammonium salts (QASs), have allowed us to gather a comprehensive database of well-established synthesis methods characterized by acceptably high yields and purities. In the past, the majority of esterquats were synthesized via esterification of aminoalcohols with fatty acids followed by quaternization [9,54,60,63,67]. Nonetheless, other routes of their synthesis are still being developed, in which other naturally derived substrates are used, such as glycine betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine) [10,11,87] or carnitine (3-hydroxy-4-(trimethylammonio)butanoate) [55,87]. It was repeatedly confirmed that their excellent tunability also enables the adjustment of various physicochemical properties, such as hydrophobicity and surface activity, which is an extraordinarily advantageous feature in terms of their plausible application.
The structural similarity of esterquats to some beneficial compounds widely present in living organisms (such as choline and betaine) allows considering them as potentially more environmentally friendly alternatives to fully synthetic QASs. Moreover, the presence of cleavable ester bonds within their structure facilitates decomposition into compounds deprived of amphiphilic properties that have been recognized as a main contributor to the toxic effect of QASs. In effect, the issue associated with the use of some hazardous commercial cationic surfactants or disinfectants can be successfully minimized by simple replacement of active ingredients with their ‘greener’ analogues.
Undoubtedly, choline- and betaine-type esterquats constitute a group of chemicals that will inspire scientists for many decades. It should be stressed that the idea of incorporating an active substance into the cation of esterquat has extreme potential to be successfully applied in the near future in medicine, particularly in the development of modern drug delivery systems, which will be able to release a drug (e.g., antibiotics or antimicrobial agents) in a controlled way. The market of agrochemicals would also gain enormous benefits if, e.g., plant growth stimulators (such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA)), responsible for significant enhancement of cultivated plant development, were utilized in this concept. One should also expect an increase in the interest in esterquats composed of a betaine-type cation, which for years have been overshadowed by compounds composed of a cation derived from choline. However, as a cheap and environmentally friendly raw material of natural origin, betaine has recently gained the interest of the scientific community, which has directly led to an increase in the number of innovative scientific works on the synthesis and applications of various derivatives of this compound, including esterquats. The reported in this field example of effective functionalization the surface of cotton fabric with glycine betaine demonstrates an insightful approach for designing novel, innovative materials with excellent additional antibacterial activity without impairing their usability.
However, there are still some areas wherein esterquats need further development, especially when considering the expansion of the scope of their commercial applications. First, it should be noted that many scientists deserve attention for their ingenuity in developing effective methods of obtaining esterquats. However, the majority of elaborate procedures are extremely complex or require some specific conditions, which makes them impossible to upscale to commercial production. Obviously, all new substances should be thoroughly tested to provide at least the most important basic parameters, such as solubility in water and surface activity as well as potential bioaccumulation in the environment. The question “What is the real relationship between the structure of esterquat and its ecological profile?” thus far remains an open question, which has not yet been solved. Unfortunately, there is a gap in the unification of the selections of physicochemical properties that are being determined for esterquats. Additionally, to date, biological tests (antimicrobial activity or toxicity) performed on esterquats have focused mainly on inconsistent experiments conducted according to different OECD protocols; hence, it is impossible to properly assess their environmental impact or draw additional unequivocal conclusions. Considering these drawbacks, future recommendations have been prepared. It is of the utmost importance to focus on the following aspects in the future:
  • Simplification of synthetic procedures that comply with the concept of ‘green chemistry’ (e.g., utilization of nontoxic solvents, high atom economy, use of sources of natural origin, minimization of unit operations);
  • Elucidation of standards for physicochemical characterization of newly synthesized esterquats. The proposed set should include tests focused on assessing their susceptibility to hydrolysis;
  • Standardization of the toxicity assay is required to ease the comparison of collected results from various experiments. Esterquats should be assessed on an appropriately selected group of organisms with the use of one unified protocol or a group of protocols adapted to their respective application;
  • The biodegradation of both ions of esterquats in soil as well as in water should be determined separately to understand their persistence in various environments. In effect, the standard activated sludge and bacteria isolated from soils should be used as a consistent set of experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Descriptions of synthesis of choline-type esterquats (pp. S3–S28) and of betaine-type esterquats (pp. S29–S49), structures of compounds described in this article (pp. S50-S62) and surface properties of esterquats (pp. S63–S69).

Funding

This work was supported by The National Science Centre (Poland) grant SONATA 14: 2018/31/D/ST5/01057 as well as the National Centre for Research and Development (Poland) grant LIDER XIII: LIDER13/0029/2022.

References

  1. Mishra, S.; Tyagi, V.K. Ester Quats: The Novel Class of Cationic Fabric Softeners. J. Oleo Sci. 2007, 56, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Javadian, S.; Aghdastinat, H.; Tehrani-Bagha, A.; Gharibi, H. Self-Assembled Nano Structures of Cationic Ester-Containing Gemini Surfactants: The Surfactant Structure and Salt Effects. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2013, 62, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tehrani-Bagha, A.R.; Oskarsson, H.; van Ginkel, C.G.; Holmberg, K. Cationic Ester-Containing Gemini Surfactants: Chemical Hydrolysis and Biodegradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 312, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gaida, B.; Brzęczek-Szafran, A. Insights into the Properties and Potential Applications of Renewable Carbohydrate-Based Ionic Liquids: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lundberg, D.; Stjerndahl, M.; Holmberg, K. Ester-based Surfactants: Are They Stable Enough? J Surfact Deterg. 2022; jsde.12628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Para, G.; Łuczyński, J.; Palus, J.; Jarek, E.; Wilk, K.A.; Warszyński, P. Hydrolysis Driven Surface Activity of Esterquat Surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 465, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Watson, M.K.; Tezel, U.; Pavlostathis, S.G. Biotransformation of Alkanoylcholines under Methanogenic Conditions. Water Res. 2012, 46, 2947–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schowanek, D.; Borsboom-Patel, T.; Bouvy, A.; Colling, J.; de Ferrer, J.A.; Eggers, D.; Groenke, K.; Gruenenwald, T.; Martinsson, J.; Mckeown, P.; et al. New and Updated Life Cycle Inventories for Surfactants Used in European Detergents: Summary of the ERASM Surfactant Life Cycle and Ecofootprinting Project. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2018, 23, 867–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Syguda, A.; Gielnik, A.; Borkowski, A.; Woźniak-Karczewska, M.; Parus, A.; Piechalak, A.; Olejnik, A.; Marecik, R.; Ławniczak, Ł.; Chrzanowski, Ł. Esterquat Herbicidal Ionic Liquids (HILs) with Two Different Herbicides: Evaluation of Activity and Phytotoxicity. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 9819–9827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Duan, P.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Zheng, W.; Li, L.; Yang, J.; Fu, F.; Diao, H.; Liu, X. Naturally Occurring Betaine Grafted on Cotton Fabric for Achieving Antibacterial and Anti-Protein Adsorption Functions. Cellulose 2020, 27, 6603–6615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Niemczak, M.; Sobiech, Ł.; Grzanka, M. Iodosulfuron-Methyl-Based Herbicidal Ionic Liquids Comprising Alkyl Betainate Cation as Novel Active Ingredients with Reduced Environmental Impact and Excellent Efficacy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 13661–13671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pernak, J.; Czerniak, K.; Niemczak, M.; Chrzanowski, Ł.; Ławniczak, Ł.; Fochtman, P.; Marcinkowska, K.; Praczyk, T. Herbicidal Ionic Liquids Based on Esterquats. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 5715–5724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wilms, W.; Woźniak-Karczewska, M.; Syguda, A.; Niemczak, M.; Ławniczak, Ł.; Pernak, J.; Rogers, R.D.; Chrzanowski, Ł. Herbicidal Ionic Liquids: A Promising Future for Old Herbicides? Review on Synthesis, Toxicity, Biodegradation, and Efficacy Studies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10456–10488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Stachowiak, W.; Smolibowski, M.; Kaczmarek, D.K.; Rzemieniecki, T.; Niemczak, M. Toward Revealing the Role of the Cation in the Phytotoxicity of the Betaine-Based Esterquats Comprising Dicamba Herbicide. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 845, 157181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mero, A.; Mezzetta, A.; Nowicki, J.; Łuczak, J.; Guazzelli, L. Betaine and L-Carnitine Ester Bromides: Synthesis and Comparative Study of Their Thermal Behaviour and Surface Activity. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 334, 115988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lindstedt, M.; Allenmark, S.; Thompson, R.A.; Edebo, L. Antimicrobial Activity of Betaine Esters, Quaternary Ammonium Amphiphiles Which Spontaneously Hydrolyze into Nontoxic Components. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990, 34, 1949–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, X.; Chen, Y.; Han, J.; Wu, X.; Wang, G.; Jiang, D. Betaine Ester-Shell Functionalized Hyperbranched Polymers for Potential Antimicrobial Usage: Guest Loading Capability, pH Controlled Release and Adjustable Compatibility. Polymer 2014, 55, 6261–6270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, J.; Gao, H.; Shi, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, W. Cationic Gemini Surfactants Containing Both Amide and Ester Groups: Synthesis, Surface Properties and Antibacterial Activity. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 299, 112248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tehrani-Bagha, A.R.; Holmberg, K. Cationic Ester-Containing Gemini Surfactants: Physical−Chemical Properties. Langmuir 2010, 26, 9276–9282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fatma, N.; Panda, M.; Kabir-ud-Din; Beg, M. Ester-Bonded Cationic Gemini Surfactants: Assessment of Their Cytotoxicity and Antimicrobial Activity. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 222, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parajó, J.J.; Macário, I.P.E.; De Gaetano, Y.; Dupont, L.; Salgado, J.; Pereira, J.L.; Gonçalves, F.J.M.; Mohamadou, A.; Ventura, S.P.M. Glycine-Betaine-Derived Ionic Liquids: Synthesis, Characterization and Ecotoxicological Evaluation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 184, 109580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Czerniak, K.; Dwiecki, K.; Majchrzycki, Ł.; Czerniak, A.; Białas, W. Synthesis and Application of Ammonium-Based Poly(Ionic Liquids) as Novel Cationic Flocculants. Chem. Pap. 2017, 71, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lundberg, D.; Ljusberg-Wahren, H.; Norlin, A.; Holmberg, K. Studies on Dodecyl Betainate in Combination with Its Degradation Products or with Phosphatidyl Choline–Phase Behavior and Hemolytic Activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 278, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rojewska, M.; Prochaska, K. The Effect of Electrolyte and Temperature on Adsorption Properties of Esterquats. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2014, 364, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cyboran-Mikołajczyk, S.; Bonarska-Kujawa, D.; Kleszczyńska, H.; Łuczyński, J. Effects of Interaction of Gemini Ester Quat Surfactants with Biological Membranes. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2016, 53, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Piotrowska, A.; Syguda, A.; Chrzanowski, Ł.; Heipieper, H.J. Toxicity of Synthetic Herbicides Containing 2,4-D and MCPA Moieties towards Pseudomonas Putida Mt-2 and Its Response at the Level of Membrane Fatty Acid Composition. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pan, X.N.; Hou, J.; Liu, L.; Yang, P.X.; Zhang, J.Q.; An, M.Z.; Li, N. A Piperidinium-Based Ester-Functionalized Ionic Liquid as Electrolytes in Li/LiFePO4 Batteries. Ionics 2017, 23, 3151–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Esterquats Market Size & Analysis | Global Industry Report, 2016-2024. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/esterquats-market (accessed on 24 September 2022).
  29. HERA Esterquats Environmental Risk Assessment Report; 2008; p. 42.
  30. Spekreijse, J.; Lammens, T.; Parisi, C.; Ronzon, T.; Vis, M. Insights into the European Market for Bio-Based Chemicals; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg (Luxembourg), 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Oikonomou, E.K.; Grandisson, C.; Golemanov, K.; Ahuja, R.; Berret, J.-F. Silicone Incorporation into an Esterquat Based Fabric Softener in Presence of Guar Polymers. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 615, 126175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abdul Aziz, H.; Yusoff, R.; Cheng, N.G.; Idris, Z.; Ramli, N.A.S. Production of N-methyldiethanolamine Di-ester via Heterogeneous Transesterification of Palm Methyl Ester over Modified Calcium Oxide Catalyst by Metal Oxides. J Surfact Deterg. 2023, 26, 477–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abdul Aziz, H.; Kheireddine Aroua, M.; Yusoff, R.; Azeerah Abas, N.; Idris, Z. Optimization of Transesterification of Palm-Based Methyl Palmitate and Triethanolamine towards Maximum Di-Esteramine Content. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sikarskie, M.; Pulukkody, R.; Bauer, P.; Leal, L.M.; Partani, E.M.; Miller, D.S.; Todd, J.P. Fabric Care Formulation. WO2022203868A1, 29 September 2022. [Google Scholar]
  35. Weng, X.; Mei, G.; Zhao, T.; Zhu, Y. Utilization of Novel Ester-Containing Quaternary Ammonium Surfactant as Cationic Collector for Iron Ore Flotation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 103, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Obiols, O.P.; Bonastre, N.; Llosas, J.B. Esterquats. US5880299A, 9 March 1999. [Google Scholar]
  37. Faunce, J.A.; Butikas, R.A.; Bernhardt, R.J.; Kovach, S.E.; Germain, T.; Wolfe, P.S.; Zaporowski, L.F.; Dameshek, A.A. Esterquat Compositions. US20210128432A1, 6 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bigorra, L.J.D.; Pi, S.R.D.; Prat, Q.E.D. Kosmetische Zubereitungen und Verfahren zu ihrer Herstellung. DE19635195C1, 29 January 1998. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schröder, T.; Scheele, S.; Mette, M. Glanz-Conditioner. DE102018202803A1, 29 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  40. Koehle, H.-J.; Seidel, K.; Schwab, P.; Westerholt, U. Formulation Comprising Ester Quats Based on Isopropanolamine. US9801797B2, 31 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
  41. Natoli, S.N.; Panandiker, R.K.; Miracle, G.S.; Hoover, J.M. Pro-Benefit-Agent Compounds with Carbon/Nitrogen Bonds. US20220403297A1, 22 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
  42. Popova, P.; Notabi, M.K.; Code, C.; Arnspang, E.C.; Andersen, M.Ø. Co-Delivery of siRNA and Etoposide to Cancer Cells Using an MDEA Esterquat Based Drug Delivery System. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 127, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kuo, Y.-C.; Wang, C.-C. Cationic Solid Lipid Nanoparticles with Primary and Quaternary Amines for Release of Saquinavir and Biocompatibility with Endothelia. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 101, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. OECD Work On Pesticides and Sustainable Pest Management. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/pesticides-biocides/OECD-Pest-Vision-Final.pdf (accessed on 19 February 2023).
  45. Emergen Research Herbicides Market, By Type (Synthetic, Bio-Based), By Application (Pulses & Oilseeds, Grains & Cereals, Commercial Crops, Fruits & Vegetables, Turf & Ornamentals), By Mode of Action (Selective, Non-Selective), and By Region Forecast to 2030. Available online: https://www.emergenresearch.com/amp/industry-report/herbicides-market (accessed on 19 February 2023).
  46. Chami, R.; Bensajjay, F.; Alehyen, S.; El Achouri, M.; Boudalia, M.; Marrakchi, K.; Bellaouchou, A.; Guenbour, A. Electrochemical Investigation and Quantum Chemicalstudies on Corrosion Inhibition for Ester-Quats Surfactants on Iron in Hydrochloricacid. JMES 2016, 8, 3034–3045. [Google Scholar]
  47. Syguda, A.; Wojcieszak, M.; Materna, K.; Woźniak-Karczewska, M.; Parus, A.; Ławniczak, Ł.; Chrzanowski, Ł. Double-Action Herbicidal Ionic Liquids Based on Dicamba Esterquats with 4-CPA, 2,4-D, MCPA, MCPP, and Clopyralid Anions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 14584–14594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Parus, A.; Homa, J.; Radoński, D.; Framski, G.; Woźniak-Karczewska, M.; Syguda, A.; Ławniczak, Ł.; Chrzanowski, Ł. Novel Esterquat-Based Herbicidal Ionic Liquids Incorporating MCPA and MCPP for Simultaneous Stimulation of Maize Growth and Fighting Cornflower. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fahri, F.; Bacha, K.; Chiki, F.F.; Mbakidi, J.-P.; Panda, S.; Bouquillon, S.; Fourmentin, S. Air Pollution: New Bio-Based Ionic Liquids Absorb Both Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Volatile Organic Compounds with High Efficiency. Env. Chem Lett 2020, 18, 1403–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mbakidi, J.-P.; Kerkache, A.; Lazar, F.; Bouquillon, S. Dissolution of Cellulose and Lignin with Biobased Ionic Liquids. J Solut. Chem 2022, 51, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Czuryszkiewicz, D.; Maćkowiak, A.; Marcinkowska, K.; Borkowski, A.; Chrzanowski, Ł.; Pernak, J. Herbicidal Ionic Liquids Containing the Acetylcholine Cation. ChemPlusChem 2019, 84, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Encyclopedia of Dietary Supplements, 0 ed.; Coates, P.M., Betz, J.M., Blackman, M.R., Cragg, G.M., Levine, M., Moss, J., White, J.D., Eds.; CRC Press, 2010; ISBN 978-1-351-23630-0. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zeisel, S.H.; Corbin, K.D. Choline. In Present Knowledge in Nutrition; Erdman, J.W., Macdonald, I.A., Zeisel, S.H., Eds.; Wiley, 2012; pp. 405–418. ISBN 978-0-470-95917-6. [Google Scholar]
  54. Han, B.; Geng, T.; Jiang, Y.; Ju, H. Synthesis and Properties of Di-Chain Esterquat Surfactants. J Surfact Deterg 2015, 18, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lozano, P.; Daz, M.; De Diego, T.; Iborra, J.L. Ester Synthesis from Trimethylammonium Alcohols in Dry Organic Media Catalyzed by immobilizedCandida Antarctica Lipase B. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 82, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mouterde, L.M.M.; Peru, A.A.M.; Mention, M.M.; Brunissen, F.; Allais, F. Sustainable Straightforward Synthesis and Evaluation of the Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Sinapine and Analogues. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 6998–7004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Nolan, M.D.; Mezzetta, A.; Guazzelli, L.; Scanlan, E.M. Radical-Mediated Thiol–Ene ‘Click’ Reactions in Deep Eutectic Solvents for Bioconjugation. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 1456–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. González-Rivera, J.; Mero, A.; Husanu, E.; Mezzetta, A.; Ferrari, C.; D’Andrea, F.; Bramanti, E.; Pomelli, C.S.; Guazzelli, L. Combining Acid-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents and Microwave Irradiation for Improved Chestnut Shell Waste Valorization. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 10101–10115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Husanu, E.; Mero, A.; Rivera, J.G.; Mezzetta, A.; Ruiz, J.C.; D’Andrea, F.; Pomelli, C.S.; Guazzelli, L. Exploiting Deep Eutectic Solvents and Ionic Liquids for the Valorization of Chestnut Shell Waste. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 18386–18399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tatsumi, T.; Zhang, W.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ono, D.; Takeda, T.; Ikeda, I. Novel Hydrolyzable and Biodegradable Cationic Gemini Surfactants: 1,3-Bis[(Acyloxyalkyl)-Dimethylammonio]-2-Hydroxypropane Dichloride. J Surfact Deterg 2000, 3, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tammelin, L.-E.; Gmelin, R.; Jensen, R.B.; Stenhagen, E.; Thorell, B. Syntheses of Choline Esters of Monobasic Carbonic Acids. Acta Chem. Scand. 1956, 10, 145–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pernak, J.; Syguda, A.; Janiszewska, D.; Materna, K.; Praczyk, T. Ionic Liquids with Herbicidal Anions. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 4838–4844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chung, Y.; Park, S. Reversed Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Separation of Esterquats with Indirect Spectrophotometric Detection. Microchem. J. 1998, 60, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Steiger, P.; Friedli, F.E. A Study on the Long-Term Stability and Removal of Quats on Treated Fabric. J Surfact Deterg 2002, 5, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gunjan; Tyagi, V.K. Synthesis of Rice Bran Fatty Acids (RBFAs) Based Cationic Surfactants and Evaluation of Their Performance Properties in Combination with Nonionic Surfactant. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2014, 51, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Narayanan, V.L.; Umapathy, M.J. Synthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Three New Cationic Surfactants. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2015, 52, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Umapathy, M.J.; Narayanan, V.L.; Magesan, P.; Chiranjeevi, P.; Jemima, S.W. Synthesis and Characterization of Biodegradable Cationic Esterquat Surfactants and the Evaluation of Its Physico-Chemical Properties. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2016, 53, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tatsumi, T.; Zhang, W.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ono, D.; Takeda, T.; Ikeda, I. Novel Hydrolyzable and Biodegradable Cationic Gemini Surfactants: Bis(Ester-Ammonium) Dichloride Having a Butenylene or a Butynylene Spacer. J Surfact Deterg 2001, 4, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, Q.; Wang, L.; Xing, F. Synthesis and Properties of Dissymmetric Gemini Surfactants. J Surfact Deterg 2011, 14, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gao, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wei, W.; Chang, H. Equilibrium and Dynamic Surface Tension Properties of Gemini Quaternary Ammonium Salt Surfactants with Ester Groups. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 509, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bregadze, V.I.; Ermanson, L.V.; Godovikov, N.N. Synthesis of Choline Esters of Carboranecarboxylic Acids. Russ Chem Bull 1976, 25, 2425–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Węgrzyńska, J.; Chlebicki, J.; Maliszewska, I. Preparation, Surface-Active Properties and Antimicrobial Activities of Bis(Ester Quaternary Ammonium) Salts. J Surfact Deterg 2007, 10, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Migahed, M.A.; Negm, N.A.; Shaban, M.M.; Ali, T.A.; Fadda, A.A. Synthesis, Characterization, Surface and Biological Activity of Diquaternary Cationic Surfactants Containing Ester Linkage. J Surfact Deterg 2016, 19, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, D.; Yang, X.; Liu, P.; Mao, T.; Shang, X.; Wang, L. Synthesis and Characterization of Gemini Ester Surfactant and Its Application in Efficient Fabric Softening. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 299, 112236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Topuzyan, V.O.; Gerasimyan, D.A.; Bagdasaryan, A.L.; Mndzhoyan, O.L. Synthesis and Biological Properties of Choline Esters of Amino Acids. Pharm Chem J 1983, 17, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hellberg, P.-E. Ortho Ester-Based Cleavable Cationic Surfactants. J Surfact Deterg 2002, 5, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gilbert, E.A.; Guastavino, J.F.; Murguía, M.C. Synthesis and Surface-active Properties of Novel Cleavable Gemini Surfactants. J Surfact Deterg, 2021; jsde.12547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Banno, T.; Toshima, K.; Kawada, K.; Matsumura, S. Synthesis and Properties of Biodegradable and Chemically Recyclable Cationic Surfactants Containing Carbonate Linkages. J. Oleo Sci. 2007, 56, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Topuzyan, V.O.; Karapetyan, I.R.; Alebyan, G.P. Synthesis and Anticholinesterase Properties of Choline Esters of α-Amino Acids. Pharm Chem J 2014, 48, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Banno, T.; Toshima, K.; Kawada, K.; Matsumura, S. Synthesis and Properties of Gemini-Type Cationic Surfactants Containing Carbonate Linkages in the Linker Moiety Directed Toward Green and Sustainable Chemistry. J Surfact Deterg 2009, 12, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Banno, T.; Kawada, K.; Matsumura, S. Creation of Novel Green and Sustainable Gemini-Type Cationics Containing Carbonate Linkages. J Surfact Deterg 2010, 13, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Stachowiak, W.; Wysocki, M.; Niemczak, M. “Bitter” Results: Toward Sustainable Synthesis of the Most Bitter Substances, Denatonium Saccharinate and Denatonium Benzoate, Starting from a Popular Anesthetic, Lidocaine. J. Chem. Educ. 2022, 99, 1604–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tang, L.; Yang, J.; Yin, Q.; Yang, L.; Gong, D.; Qin, F.; Liu, J.; Fan, Q.; Li, J.; Zhao, W.; et al. Janus Particles Self-Assembled from a Small Organic Atypical Asymmetric Gemini Surfactant. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 8675–8678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhuang, W.; Hachem, K.; Bokov, D.; Javed Ansari, M.; Taghvaie Nakhjiri, A. Ionic Liquids in Pharmaceutical Industry: A Systematic Review on Applications and Future Perspectives. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 349, 118145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wu, X.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, Z.; Wu, W.; Lu, Y.; Qi, J. Ionic Liquids as a Useful Tool for Tailoring Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. J. Control Release 2021, 338, 268–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lattuada, M.; Hatton, T.A. Synthesis, Properties and Applications of Janus Nanoparticles. Nano Today 2011, 6, 286–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Häckl, K.; Mühlbauer, A.; Ontiveros, J.F.; Marinkovic, S.; Estrine, B.; Kunz, W.; Nardello-Rataj, V. Carnitine Alkyl Ester Bromides as Novel Biosourced Ionic Liquids, Cationic Hydrotropes and Surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 511, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Cayley, S.; Lewis, B.A.; Record, M.T. Origins of the Osmoprotective Properties of Betaine and Proline in Escherichia Coli K-12. J Bacteriol 1992, 174, 1586–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Watkins, A.J.; Roussel, E.G.; Parkes, R.J.; Sass, H. Glycine Betaine as a Direct Substrate for Methanogens (Methanococcoides Spp.). Appl Env. Microbiol 2014, 80, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Abranches, D.O.; Silva, L.P.; Martins, M.A.R.; Pinho, S.P.; Coutinho, J.A.P. Understanding the Formation of Deep Eutectic Solvents: Betaine as a Universal Hydrogen Bond Acceptor. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 4916–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Colombo Dugoni, G.; Mezzetta, A.; Guazzelli, L.; Chiappe, C.; Ferro, M.; Mele, A. Purification of Kraft Cellulose under Mild Conditions Using Choline Acetate Based Deep Eutectic Solvents. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 8680–8691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Vieira Sanches, M.; Freitas, R.; Oliva, M.; Mero, A.; De Marchi, L.; Cuccaro, A.; Fumagalli, G.; Mezzetta, A.; Colombo Dugoni, G.; Ferro, M.; et al. Are Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents Always a Sustainable Option? A Bioassay-Based Study. Env. Sci Pollut Res 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Muntz, J.A. THE INABILITY OF CHOLINE TO TRANSFER A METHYL GROUP DIRECTLY TO HOMOCYSTEINE FOR METHIONINE FORMATION. J. Biol. Chem. 1950, 182, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mäkelä, P. Agro-Industrial Uses of Glycinebetaine. Sugar Tech 2004, 6, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mohammadzadeh, M.; Honarvar, M.; Zarei, A.R.; Mashhadi Akbar Boojar, M.; Bakhoda, H. A New Approach for Separation and Recovery of Betaine from Beet Molasses Based on Cloud Point Extraction Technique. J Food Sci Technol 2018, 55, 1215–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Registration Dossier – ECHA. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/pl/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/15954/7/3/2 (accessed on 9 September 2022).
  97. Holden, D.A. Synthesis and Spreading Behaviour of Some Reactive Derivatives of Long-Chain Alcohols and Carboxylic Acids. Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nederberg, F.; Bowden, T.; Hilborn, J. Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties of Phosphoryl Choline Functionalized Poly ε-Caprolactone and Charged Phospholipid Analogues. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lundberg, D.; Holmberg, K. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies on Hydrolysis Kinetics and Micellar Growth in Solutions of Surface-Active Betaine Esters. J Surfact Deterg 2004, 7, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fatma, N.; Ansari, W.H.; Panda, M.; ud-Din, K. Mixed Micellization Behavior of Gemini (Cationic Ester-Bonded) Surfactants with Conventional (Cationic, Anionic and Nonionic) Surfactants in Aqueous Medium. Z. Für Phys. Chem. 2013, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, X.-G.; Xing, X.-J.; Gao, Z.-N. Synthesis and Physicochemical Properties of Star-like Cationic Trimeric Surfactants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 457, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Thompson, R.A.; Allenmark, S.; Larsen, S.; Teuber, L.; Lucanska, B.; Krätsmar-Smogrovic, J.; Valent, A.; Alminger, T.; Erickson, M.; Grundevik, I.; et al. Effects of Molecular Association on the Rates of Hydrolysis of Long-Chain Alkyl Betainates (Alkoxycarbonyl-N,N,N-Trialkylmethanaminium Halides). Acta Chem. Scand. 1989, 43, 690–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhang, Z.; Cheng, G.; Carr, L.R.; Vaisocherová, H.; Chen, S.; Jiang, S. The Hydrolysis of Cationic Polycarboxybetaine Esters to Zwitterionic Polycarboxybetaines with Controlled Properties. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 4719–4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Messadi, A.; Mohamadou, A.; Boudesocque, S.; Dupont, L.; Fricoteaux, P.; Nguyen-Van-Nhien, A.; Courty, M. Syntheses and Characterisation of Hydrophobic Ionic Liquids Containing Trialkyl(2-Ethoxy-2-Oxoethyl)Ammonium or N-(1-Methylpyrrolidyl-2-Ethoxy-2-Oxoethyl)Ammonium Cations. J. Mol. Liq. 2013, 184, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kim, J.-H.; Woo, H.-S.; Jin, S.-J.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, W.; Ryu, K.; Kim, D.-W. Lithium–Oxygen Batteries with Ester-Functionalized Ionic Liquid-Based Electrolytes. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 80014–80021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Allen, R.A.; Jennings, M.C.; Mitchell, M.A.; Al-Khalifa, S.E.; Wuest, W.M.; Minbiole, K.P.C. Ester- and Amide-Containing multiQACs: Exploring Multicationic Soft Antimicrobial Agents. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 2107–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yasa, S.R.; Poornachandra, Y.; Kumar, C.G.; Penumarthy, V. Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activity of a New Class of 11-Bromoundecanoic Acid-Based Betaines. Med Chem Res 2017, 26, 2592–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bhadani, A.; Endo, T.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, H.; Abe, M. Synthesis and Dilute Aqueous Solution Properties of Ester Functionalized Cationic Gemini Surfactants Having Different Ethylene Oxide Units as Spacer. Colloid Polym Sci 2014, 292, 1685–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wen, Y.; Ge, X.; Gao, W.; Wei, W.; Qiao, Y.; Chang, H. Synthesis and Aggregation Properties of Ethylene Glycol Ester-Based Cationic Gemini Surfactants. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2020, 37, 100274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Garcia, M.T.; Ribosa, I.; Kowalczyk, I.; Pakiet, M.; Brycki, B. Biodegradability and Aquatic Toxicity of New Cleavable Betainate Cationic Oligomeric Surfactants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Yasa, S.R.; Kaki, S.S.; Poornachandra, Y.; Kumar, C.G.; Penumarthy, V. Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial and Biofilm Inhibitory Studies of New Esterquats. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 1978–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Granö, H.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.; Suortti, T.; Käki, J.; Nurmi, K. Preparation of Starch Betainate: A Novel Cationic Starch Derivative. Carbohydr. Polym. 2000, 41, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sievänen, K.; Kavakka, J.; Hirsilä, P.; Vainio, P.; Karisalmi, K.; Fiskari, J.; Kilpeläinen, I. Cationic Cellulose Betainate for Wastewater Treatment. Cellulose 2015, 22, 1861–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Vassel, B.; Skelly, W.G. N-Chlorobetainyl Chloride: Ammonium Chloride, [(Chloroformyl)Methyl]Trimethyl-. In Organic Syntheses; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003; p. 28. ISBN 978-0-471-26422-4. [Google Scholar]
  115. Goursaud, F.; Berchel, M.; Guilbot, J.; Legros, N.; Lemiègre, L.; Marcilloux, J.; Plusquellec, D.; Benvegnu, T. Glycine Betaine as a Renewable Raw Material to “Greener” New Cationic Surfactants. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. De Gaetano, Y.; Mohamadou, A.; Boudesocque, S.; Hubert, J.; Plantier-Royon, R.; Dupont, L. Ionic Liquids Derived from Esters of Glycine Betaine: Synthesis and Characterization. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 207, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Pérusse, D.; Guégan, J.P.; Rolland, H.; Guilbot, J.; Benvegnu, T. Efficient Solvent-Free Cationization of Alkylpolyglycoside Based Surfactant Compositions Using Natural Glycine Betaine. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 1664–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Journoux-Lapp, C.; De Oliveira Vigier, K.; Bachmann, C.; Marinkovic, S.; Estrine, B.; Frapper, G.; Jérôme, F. Elucidation of the Role of Betaine Hydrochloride in Glycerol Esterification: Towards Bio-Based Ionic Building Blocks. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 5647–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sharma, M.; Aguado, R.; Murtinho, D.; Valente, A.J.M.; Ferreira, P.J.T. Novel Approach on the Synthesis of Starch Betainate by Transesterification. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 182, 1681–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Webb, R.G.; Haskell, M.W.; Stammer, C.H. A Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Method for Distinguishing.Alpha.-Amino Acids from.Beta. and.Gamma. Isomers. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 576–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Holmberg, K. Novel Surfactants: Preparation, Applications, and Biodegradability, 2nd ed.; rev.expanded; M. Dekker: New York, 2003; ISBN 978-0-8247-5621-5. [Google Scholar]
  122. Kayashima, T.; Taruki, M.; Katagiri, K.; Nabeoka, R.; Yoshida, T.; Tsuji, T. Comparison of Biodegradation Performance of OECD Test Guideline 301C with That of Other Ready Biodegradability Tests: Comparison of Performance of Ready Biodegradability Tests. Env. Toxicol Chem 2014, 33, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. OECD Test No. 310: Ready Biodegradability - CO2 in Sealed Vessels (Headspace Test); OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 3; OECD, 2014; ISBN 978-92-64-22450-6.
  124. OECD Test No. 301: Ready Biodegradability; OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 3; OECD, 1992; ISBN 978-92-64-07034-9.
  125. Wilms, W.; Woźniak-Karczewska, M.; Niemczak, M.; Lisiecki, P.; Zgoła-Grześkowiak, A.; Ławniczak, Ł.; Framski, G.; Pernak, J.; Owsianiak, M.; Vogt, C.; et al. Quantifying the Mineralization of 13 C-Labeled Cations and Anions Reveals Differences in Microbial Biodegradation of Herbicidal Ionic Liquids between Water and Soil. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 3412–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Pernak, J.; Niemczak, M.; Chrzanowski, Ł.; Ławniczak, Ł.; Fochtman, P.; Marcinkowska, K.; Praczyk, T. Betaine and Carnitine Derivatives as Herbicidal Ionic Liquids. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 12012–12021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Mbakidi, J.-P.; Barjhoux, I.; Aguibi, K.; Geffard, A.; Rioult, D.; Palos Ladeiro, M.; Bouquillon, S. Synthesis of New Betaine-Based Ionic Liquids by Using a “One-Pot” Amidation Process and Evaluation of Their Ecotoxicity through a New Method Involving a Hemocyte-Based Bioassay. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 15427–15441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Homa, J.; Stachowiak, W.; Olejniczak, A.; Chrzanowski, Ł.; Niemczak, M. Ecotoxicity Studies Reveal That Organic Cations in Dicamba-Derived Ionic Liquids Can Pose a Greater Environmental Risk than the Herbicide Itself. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 922, 171062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Feder-Kubis, J.; Wnętrzak, A.; Suchodolski, J.; Tomasz Mitkowski, P.; Krasowska, A. Imidazolium Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids with Alkoxymethyl Substituent: A Quest for Improved Microbiological Selectivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 442, 136062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cvjetko Bubalo, M.; Radošević, K.; Radojčić Redovniković, I.; Halambek, J.; Gaurina Srček, V. A Brief Overview of the Potential Environmental Hazards of Ionic Liquids. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 99, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Stolte, S.; Steudte, S.; Igartua, A.; Stepnowski, P. The Biodegradation of Ionic Liquids - the View from a Chemical Structure Perspective. COC 2011, 15, 1946–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Pernak, J.; Sobaszkiewicz, K.; Mirska, I. Anti-Microbial Activities of Ionic Liquids. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chauhan, V.; Kumar, M.; Soni, I.; Shandilya, P.; Singh, S. Synthesis, Physical Properties and Cytotoxic Assessment of Ester-Terminated Gemini Imidazolium Surfactants. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 387, 122645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Behler, A.D.; Fabry, B.D.; Pi, R.D.; Bigorra, L.J.D.; Prat, Q.E.D. Verfahren zur Herstellung fester Esterquats mit verbessertem Emulgiervermögen. DE4335782C1 July 28, 1994.
  135. Agbley, E.K.; Zuniga, A.; Hernandez, E.H. Silicone-Free Personal Care Compositions and Methods for the Same. US20220202673A1, 30 June 2022. [Google Scholar]
  136. Guimares, J.P.D.; Carvalho, L.V.D. Hair Treatment Compositions Comprising an Esterquat. WO2020061658A1, 2 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
  137. Barberan, P.C.; Costero, J.R. Hair Conditioner. US1061, 14 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
  138. Rub, M.A.; Khan, F.; Asiri, A.M. The Influence of Various Solvents on the Interaction between Gemini Surfactant (Ester-Bonded) and Imipramine Hydrochloride: An Aggregational, Interfacial, and Thermodynamic Study. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 334, 116524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Fei, Y.; Zhou, F.; Wang, P.; Deng, Y. Biodegradable Betaine-Based Aprotic Task-Specific Ionic Liquids and Their Application in Efficient SO 2 Absorption. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 3798–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Chong, Y. Corrosion Inhibition Effect of Betaine Type Quaternary Ammonium Salt on AA2024-T3 in 0.01 mol·L−1 NaOH: Experimental and Theoretical Research. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1274, 134395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The structures of the most popular esterquats: triethanolamine esterquat (TEAQ), diethanol amine esterquat (DEEDMAC), and N,N,-dimethyl-3-aminopropane-1,2-diol esterquat (HEQ).
Figure 1. The structures of the most popular esterquats: triethanolamine esterquat (TEAQ), diethanol amine esterquat (DEEDMAC), and N,N,-dimethyl-3-aminopropane-1,2-diol esterquat (HEQ).
Preprints 103940 g001
Figure 2. Reported applications of esterquats [3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
Figure 2. Reported applications of esterquats [3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
Preprints 103940 g002
Figure 3. General formula of choline-type and betaine-type esterquats. R = alkyl or part of a biologically active molecule (e.g., dicamba).
Figure 3. General formula of choline-type and betaine-type esterquats. R = alkyl or part of a biologically active molecule (e.g., dicamba).
Preprints 103940 g003
Figure 4. Derivatization strategies of known herbicides toward esterquats: (A) IL formation from the cholinium cation and herbicidal anion; (B) covalent modifications of the esterquat structure, in a manner similar to prodrug approach, with a formation of easily hydrolysable ester bond; (C) a combination of a “prodrug” strategy and salt formation.
Figure 4. Derivatization strategies of known herbicides toward esterquats: (A) IL formation from the cholinium cation and herbicidal anion; (B) covalent modifications of the esterquat structure, in a manner similar to prodrug approach, with a formation of easily hydrolysable ester bond; (C) a combination of a “prodrug” strategy and salt formation.
Preprints 103940 g004
Figure 5. Structure of asymmetric gemini surfactant derived from carbonate and lidocaine moieties.
Figure 5. Structure of asymmetric gemini surfactant derived from carbonate and lidocaine moieties.
Preprints 103940 g005
Figure 6. Left: structure of lidocaine-derived choline esterquat spontaneously self-assembling into Janus particles (A, B); middle: MDEA esterquat for delivery of cytostatic drugs and small RNA fragments (C); right: antioxidant sinapine esterquat derivative (D).
Figure 6. Left: structure of lidocaine-derived choline esterquat spontaneously self-assembling into Janus particles (A, B); middle: MDEA esterquat for delivery of cytostatic drugs and small RNA fragments (C); right: antioxidant sinapine esterquat derivative (D).
Preprints 103940 g006
Figure 7. Structure of alkyl betainate cation, pared with iodosulfuron methyl and dicamba anions.
Figure 7. Structure of alkyl betainate cation, pared with iodosulfuron methyl and dicamba anions.
Preprints 103940 g007
Figure 8. Proposed alkanoylcholine and alkylbetaine transformation pathways and stoichiometry under methanogenic conditions. The colored figures are total electron densities mapped as electrostatic potential between L0.01 and 0.01 e/au3, and the structures were modified to fit their potential surfaces [7,89]. The surfaces were drawn and optimized using Avogadro and its basic optimization algorithm, and the potential surfaces were generated using Jmol (potential surfaces -0.1 – 0.1).
Figure 8. Proposed alkanoylcholine and alkylbetaine transformation pathways and stoichiometry under methanogenic conditions. The colored figures are total electron densities mapped as electrostatic potential between L0.01 and 0.01 e/au3, and the structures were modified to fit their potential surfaces [7,89]. The surfaces were drawn and optimized using Avogadro and its basic optimization algorithm, and the potential surfaces were generated using Jmol (potential surfaces -0.1 – 0.1).
Preprints 103940 g008
Figure 9. Chemoenzymatic degradation of gemini-type esterquats using immobilized lipase CR [80].
Figure 9. Chemoenzymatic degradation of gemini-type esterquats using immobilized lipase CR [80].
Preprints 103940 g009
Figure 10. Structures of choline- and betaine derived esterquats subjected to hydrolysis studies.
Figure 10. Structures of choline- and betaine derived esterquats subjected to hydrolysis studies.
Preprints 103940 g010
Figure 11. Biodegradation of esterquats and their classification (numbers of compounds correspond to entries from Table 7) [3,12].
Figure 11. Biodegradation of esterquats and their classification (numbers of compounds correspond to entries from Table 7) [3,12].
Preprints 103940 g011
Figure 12. Structures of different type of cations.
Figure 12. Structures of different type of cations.
Preprints 103940 g012
Figure 14. Examples of compounds utilized as surfactants, emulsifiers and foam stabilizers.
Figure 14. Examples of compounds utilized as surfactants, emulsifiers and foam stabilizers.
Preprints 103940 g014
Figure 15. Plot of initial foam volume and after 3 minutes for 0.1 wt.% surfactants at 25 °C. (cations structures are detailed in Table S3 in ESI, a: Entry 66, b: Entry 67, c: Entry 68, d: Entry 69, e: Entry 70, f: Entry 71, g: Entry 72, h: Entry 73, i: Entry 74). Reprinted from J. Mol. Liq. 299, 112248, J.Wu et al. “Cationic gemini surfactants containing both amide and ester groups: Synthesis, surface properties and antibacterial activity”, Copyright 2020, with permission from Elsevier[18].
Figure 15. Plot of initial foam volume and after 3 minutes for 0.1 wt.% surfactants at 25 °C. (cations structures are detailed in Table S3 in ESI, a: Entry 66, b: Entry 67, c: Entry 68, d: Entry 69, e: Entry 70, f: Entry 71, g: Entry 72, h: Entry 73, i: Entry 74). Reprinted from J. Mol. Liq. 299, 112248, J.Wu et al. “Cationic gemini surfactants containing both amide and ester groups: Synthesis, surface properties and antibacterial activity”, Copyright 2020, with permission from Elsevier[18].
Preprints 103940 g015
Figure 16. Examples of esterquats utilized as flocculants and fabric softeners.
Figure 16. Examples of esterquats utilized as flocculants and fabric softeners.
Preprints 103940 g016
Figure 17. Example of compounds utilized as pharmaceuticals and antiseptics.
Figure 17. Example of compounds utilized as pharmaceuticals and antiseptics.
Preprints 103940 g017
Figure 18. Scheme demonstrating the cotton fabric functionalized by glycine betaine.[10]
Figure 18. Scheme demonstrating the cotton fabric functionalized by glycine betaine.[10]
Preprints 103940 g018
Figure 19. Examples of esterquat cations utilized as agrochemicals.
Figure 19. Examples of esterquat cations utilized as agrochemicals.
Preprints 103940 g019
Figure 20. Phytotoxicity of alkyl betainate bromides (D, n=1) toward white mustard, where the alkyl chain (R) starts from ethyl (1) to octadecyl (9) in comparison to sodium bromide (10) [14].
Figure 20. Phytotoxicity of alkyl betainate bromides (D, n=1) toward white mustard, where the alkyl chain (R) starts from ethyl (1) to octadecyl (9) in comparison to sodium bromide (10) [14].
Preprints 103940 g020
Figure 21. Example of esterquats utilized as materials in electrochemistry.
Figure 21. Example of esterquats utilized as materials in electrochemistry.
Preprints 103940 g021
Table 1. The general methods of the synthetic methods for choline-based esterquats. Structures of esterquats are presented in ESI (pp. S4-S20).
Table 1. The general methods of the synthetic methods for choline-based esterquats. Structures of esterquats are presented in ESI (pp. S4-S20).
Synthetic Procedures Location References
Fischer esterification of aminoalcohols pp. S4-S8, ESI [29,49,54,60,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]
Acylation and subsequent quaternization of amino alcohols pp. S8-S11, ESI [3,6,9,47,62,71,72,73,74]
Other methods of derivatization of carboxylic acids pp. S11-S16, ESI [55,56,61,75,76,77,78,79,80,81]
Utilization of biologically active compounds pp. S17-S20, ESI [9,47,56,82,83]
Table 2. This is a table. Tables should be placed in the main text near to the first time they are cited.
Table 2. This is a table. Tables should be placed in the main text near to the first time they are cited.
Strategy Cation Anion Activity Benefits Ref
Core R1 (strategy A)
Or Herbicidal moiety (strategies B and C)
R2
1 A Choline -CH=CH2 CH3 MCPA 1 Herbicidal Replacement of conventional tetraalkylammonium cation in salt-type herbicides with more environmentally-friendly esterquat
[12]
A Choline -CH=CH2 CH3 MCPP 2
A Choline -CH=CH2 CH3 2,4-D 3
A Choline -CH=CH2 CH3 Dicamba 4
2 A Choline -C(CH3)=CH2 CH3 MCPA Herbicidal [12]
A Choline -C(CH3)=CH2 CH3 MCPP
A Choline -C(CH3)=CH2 CH3 2,4-D
A Choline -C(CH3)=CH2 CH3 Dicamba
3 A MDEA Tallow 5 CH3 MCPA [12]
A MDEA Tallow CH3 MCPP Herbicidal
A MDEA Tallow CH3 2,4-D
4 B Choline 2,4-D C6H13 Br Herbicidal Esterified form of herbicide exhibits higher activity and is non-volatile due to presence of ions [26]
B Choline 2,4-D C10H21 Br
5 B Choline MCPA C6H13 Br Herbicidal [26]
B Choline MCPA C10H21 Br
6 B Choline MCPA C10H21 Br Herbicidal Synthesized as precursors to esterquats with two active ingredients within the molecule [9]
7 B Choline Dicamba C10H21 Br Herbicidal [47]
B Choline Dicamba C12H25 Br
B Choline Dicamba C14H29 Br
8 C Choline 2,4-D C10H21 MCPA Herbicidal Introduction of additional active ingredient into the molecule, which contributes to enhancement of efficacy, broadening spectrum of activity and minimization of resistance issue [9]
C Choline 2,4-D C10H21 MCPP
C Choline 2,4-D C10H21 4-CPA 6
C Choline MCPA C10H21 2,4-D
C Choline MCPA C10H21 MCPP
C Choline MCPA C10H21 4-CPA
C Choline MCPP C10H21 2,4-D
C Choline MCPP C10H21 2,4-D
C Choline MCPP C10H21 MCPA
C Choline 4-CPA C10H21 MCPP
C Choline MCPA C10H21 Clopyralid 7
C Choline MCPA C10H21 Dicamba
C Choline 4-CPA C10H21 Clopyralid
C Choline 4-CPA C10H21 Dicamba
9 C Choline MCPA C8H17 MCPP Herbicidal Introduction of additional active ingredient into the molecule, which contributes to enhancement of efficacy, broadening spectrum of activity and minimization of resistance issue [48]
C Choline MCPA C9H19 MCPP
C Choline MCPA C10H21 MCPP
C Choline MCPA C11H23 MCPP
C Choline MCPA C12H25 MCPP
C Choline MCPA C14H29 MCPP
10 C Choline Dicamba C10H21 4-CPA Herbicidal Introduction of additional active ingredient into the molecule, which contributes to enhancement of efficacy, broadening spectrum of activity and minimization of resistance issue [47]
C Choline Dicamba C12H25 4-CPA
C Choline Dicamba C14H29 4-CPA
C Choline Dicamba C10H21 2,4-D
C Choline Dicamba C12H25 2,4-D
C Choline Dicamba C14H29 2,4-D
C Choline Dicamba C10H21 MCPA
C Choline Dicamba C12H25 MCPA
C Choline Dicamba C14H29 MCPA
C Choline Dicamba C10H21 MCPP
C Choline Dicamba C12H25 MCPP
C Choline Dicamba C14H29 MCPP
C Choline Dicamba C10H21 Clopyralid
C Choline Dicamba C12H25 Clopyralid
C Choline Dicamba C14H29 Clopyralid
1 MCPA: 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetate, 2 MCPP: (R)-2-(4-chloro-o-tolyloxy)propionate, 3 2,4-D: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate, 4 Dicamba: 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoate, 5 Tallow means the mixture of alkyl chains with length distribution as follows: 1% C12H25, 4% C14H29, 31% C16H33, 64% C18H37, 6 4-CPA: 4-chlorophenoxyacetate, 7 Clopyralid: 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylate.
Table 3. Reported choline-type esterquats with other biologically active moiety in their structure. Detailed structures of all cations are presented in ESI (pp. S21 – S33).
Table 3. Reported choline-type esterquats with other biologically active moiety in their structure. Detailed structures of all cations are presented in ESI (pp. S21 – S33).
Core Moiety n R1 (Figure 6) Anion Activity Available metrics Notes Ref
Lidocaine-derived choline
A Lidocaine-derived choline 1 C5H11 Cl Analgesic and surface activity ND 1 Self-assembled JPs 6 [83]
A Lidocaine-derived choline 1 C7H15 Cl REC50 2 3.5 mmol/L
CMC 3 2.51 mM
A Lidocaine-derived choline 1 C9H19 Cl -
A Lidocaine-derived choline 1 C12H25 Cl -
A Lidocaine-derived choline 1 C7H15 Cl -
B Lidocaine-derived choline - C8H17 Cl - EC50 5 3.8 mmol/L
CMC 1.27 mM
MDEA derivative
C MDEA esterquat for delivery of cytostatic drugs - - - - - Delivery of cytostatic drugs and siRNA [42]
Sinapine derivative X Y Anion
D Sinapine OCH3 OCH3 Cl Antimicrobial and antioxidant/ Food preservative EC50 (E. coli) 0.0056 µg/mL
EC50 (DPPH) 5 18.1 nmol/L
Antioxidant antimicrobial, anti-UV, anti-inflammatory, anticancer properties [56]
D Coumaric acid H H Cl EC50 (E. coli) >0.0375 µg/mL
EC50 (DPPH) >150 nmol/L
D Caffeic acid OH H Cl EC50 (E. coli) 0.0017 µg/mLEC50 (DPPH) 6.26 nmol/L
D Ferulic acid OCH3 H Cl EC50 (E. coli) 0.0103 µg/mL
EC50 (DPPH) 36.73 nmol/L
1 ND – not determined; 2 REC50: relative effective concentration determined using rat sciatic nerve block test; 3 CMC: critical micelle concentration; 4 EC50 (E. Coli): half maximal effective concentration against Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria; 5 EC50 (DPPH): Antioxidant activity determined by diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging; 6 Janus particles.
Table 4. The general methods of the synthetic methods for betaine-based esterquats. Structures of esterquats are presented in ESI (pp. S29-S42).
Table 4. The general methods of the synthetic methods for betaine-based esterquats. Structures of esterquats are presented in ESI (pp. S29-S42).
Synthetic Procedures Location References
Synthesis from haloacyl halides pp. S29-S32, ESI [3,16,17,18,97,98,99,100,101,102]
Synthesis from haloesters pp. S32-S37, ESI [103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111]
Synthesis from chlorobetainyl chloride pp. S37-S38, ESI [112,113,114]
Synthesis of glycine betaine by classic esterification pp. S38-S41, ESI [10,115,116,117,118,119,120]
Synthesis by O-alkylation of betaines pp. S41-S42, ESI [11,87]
Synthesis by anion exchange p. S42, ESI [11,14]
Table 5. Reported betaine-type esterquats with biologically active moiety in their structure.
Table 5. Reported betaine-type esterquats with biologically active moiety in their structure.
No Cation Anion Moiety introduced Activity /Potential application Available metrics Notes Ref
1 R1 = from C2H5 to C18H37 IS-M 1 IS-M herbicidal /agrochemical Application dose – 10 g a.i. /ha 2 All compounds were as effective as commercial product without addition of adjuvant [11]
2 R1 = from C2H5 to C18H37 Dicamba 3 Dicamba herbicidal /agrochemical Application dose – 200 g a.i./ha All compounds were more effective than commercial active ingredient (sodium salt of dicamba) product without addition of adjuvant [14]
1 IS-M – Iodosulfuron methyl; 2 a.i. /ha – active ingredient applied per hectare; 3 Dicamba - 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid.
Table 6. Overview of the hydrolysis rate of esterquats (Note that the rates of hydrolysis are not always linear).
Table 6. Overview of the hydrolysis rate of esterquats (Note that the rates of hydrolysis are not always linear).
Entry Cation Anion Hydrolysis rate
Time to complete hydrolysis
Conditions Ref
Core R1 n Y
Choline-type esterquats
1 A Tallow 1 - - CH3SO4- 0.5% per month Atmospheric [64]
2 B C8H17 1 - Cl Complete/ 200 min * 21 °C, pH = 4 [76]
3 B C10H21 1 - Cl >300 min * 21 °C, pH = 4
4 B C10H21 1 - Cl 160 days * 21 °C, pH = 8
5 B C10H21 1 - Cl Stable 2, >>365 days * 21 °C, pH = 10
6 B C12H25 1 - Cl >19 h * 21 °C, pH = 3
7 B C12H25 1 - Cl >22.5 h * 21 °C, pH = 4
8 B C12H25 1 - Cl 120 min * 50 °C, pH = 4
9 B C14H29 1 - Cl 270 min * 50 °C, pH = 4
10 B C16H33 1 - Cl 110 min * 50 °C, pH = 4
11 C C10H21 1 - 2Cl 43% in 20 h 20 °C, 5 eq. NaOH [77]
12 C C10H21 1 - 2Cl 62% in 20 h 20 °C, 10 eq. NaOH
13 C C14H29 1 - 2Cl 10% in 20 h 80 °C, 75% (v/v) AcOH
14 C C14H29 1 - 2Cl 12% in 20 h 80 °C, 10 eq. HCl
15 C C14H29 1 - 2Cl 92% in 20 h 80 °C, 10 eq. NaOH
16 C C14H29 1 - 2Cl 2% in 20 h 80 °C, water
17 D C12H25 1 - 2I 9% in 10 days 25 °C, pH = 7 (non-buffered water) [80]
18 D C12H25 1 - 2I 50% in 6 days 25 °C, pH = 7 (phosphate-buffered water)
19 D C12H25 1 - 2I Unstable ** 3 40 °C, pH = 7 (non-buffered water)
20 D C12H25 2 - 2I 1% in 10 days 25 °C, pH = 7 (non-buffered water)
21 D C12H25 2 - 2I 5% in 10 days 25 °C, pH = 7 (phosphate-buffered water)
22 D C12H25 2 H 2I 40% in 8 days 40 °C, pH = 7 (phosphate-buffered water)
23 E C12H25 2 H 2I 2% in 20 days 25 °C, pH = 7 (non-buffered water) [81]
24 E C12H25 2 H 2I 2% in 20 days 25 °C, pH = 4 (acetate-buffered water)
25 E C12H25 2 H 2I 4% in 20 days 25 °C, pH = 7 (phosphate-buffered water)
26 E C12H25 1 CH3 2I 3% in 20 days 25 °C, pH = 7 (non-buffered water)
27 E C12H25 1 CH3 2I 10% in 20 days 25 °C, pH = 4 (acetate-buffered water)
28 E C12H25 1 CH3 2I 20% in 20 days 25 °C, pH = 7 (phosphate-buffered water)
29 F C14H29 1 - Br Stable ** 2 0.4 M HCl [47]
30 F C14H29 1 - Br 30 min 0.4 M NaOH
31 F C14H29 1 - Dicamba Stable ** 2 0.4 M HCl
32 F C14H29 1 - Dicamba 30 min 0.4 M NaOH
Betaine-type esterquats
33 G C14H29 1 - Cl Stable ** 2 30 °C, pH = 3 [16]
34 G C14H29 1 - Cl 90% in 24 h 30 °C, pH = 5
35 G C14H29 1 - Cl 15% in 18 h 30 °C, pH = 6
36 G C14H29 1 - Cl 100% in 20 h 25 °C, pH = 7
37 G C14H29 1 - Cl 90% in 4 h 30 °C, pH = 8
38 G C14H29 1 - Cl 90% in 2 h 30 °C, pH = 9
39 G C14H29 1 - Cl 100% in 5 h 25 °C, pH = 7.9 (phosphate buffer)
40 G C14H29 1 - Cl 100% in 5 h 25 °C, pH = 7.9 (phosphate buffer), 0.1 M NaCl
41 G C14H29 1 - Cl 25% in 5 h 25 °C, pH = 7.9 (phosphate buffer), 0.5 M NaCl
42 G C14H29 1 - Cl 15% in 5 h 25 °C, pH = 7.9 (phosphate buffer), 1 M NaCl
43 H C8H17 1 (CH2)2 2Cl 1 min 0.025 M H2SO4 [18]
44 H C8H17 1 (CH2)2 2Cl 10 s 0.025 M NaOH
45 H C10H21 1 (CH2)2 2Cl 34 min 0.025 M H2SO4
46 H C10H21 1 (CH2)2 2Cl 15 s 0.025 M NaOH
47 H C12H25 1 (CH2)2 2Cl 210 min 0.025 M H2SO4
48 H C12H25 1 (CH2)2 2Cl 20 s 0.025 M NaOH
49 H C8H17 1 (CH2)3 2Cl 1 min 0.025 M H2SO4
50 H C8H17 1 (CH2)3 2Cl 10 s 0.025 M NaOH
51 H C10H21 1 (CH2)3 2Cl 41 min 0.025 M H2SO4
52 H C10H21 1 (CH2)3 2Cl 10 s 0.025 M NaOH
53 H C12H25 1 (CH2)3 2Cl 255 min 0.025 M H2SO4
54 H C12H25 1 (CH2)3 2Cl 20 s 0.025 M NaOH
55 H C8H17 1 (CH2)4 2Cl 1 min 0.025 M H2SO4
56 H C8H17 1 (CH2)4 2Cl 10 s 0.025 M NaOH
57 H C10H21 1 (CH2)4 2Cl 46 min 0.025 M H2SO4
58 H C10H21 1 (CH2)4 2Cl 15 s 0.025 M NaOH
59 H C12H25 1 (CH2)4 2Cl 340 min 0.025 M H2SO4
60 H C12H25 1 (CH2)4 2Cl 25 s 0.025 M NaOH
61 I C10H21 1 - 2Br Unstable ** 3 pH = 4 [106]
62 I C10H21 1 - 2Br 16 h pH = 7
63 I C10H21 1 - 2Br Unstable ** 3 pH = 10
64 J C10H21 1 - 2Br Unstable ** 3 pH = 4 [106]
65 J C10H21 1 - 2Br 6 h pH = 7
66 J C10H21 1 - 2Br Unstable ** 3 pH = 10
67 K C18H37 1 - CH3SO4 Stable ** 2 RT, pH = 3.5 [115]
68 K C18H37 1 - CH3SO4 Stable ** 2 RT, pH = 4.5
69 K C18H37 1 - CH3SO4 Stable ** 2 RT, pH = 5.6
70 K C18H37 1 - CH3SO4 80% in 20 days RT, pH = 6.6
71 K C18H37 1 - CH3SO4 90% in 20 days RT, pH = 7.5
72 K C18H37 1 - CH3SO4 100% in 15 days RT, pH = 8.1
* - data refers to orthoesters that do not contain carbonyl groups, therefore, their susceptibility to hydrolysis at different pH values is compared to choline type esterquats; ** - data not specified, 1 Tallow fatty acids, chain length distribution not provided; 2 Stable: no major changes during the measurement time; 3 Unstable - instant decomposition; 4 Dicamba: 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoate.
Table 7. Overview of biodegradation studies on esterquats.
Table 7. Overview of biodegradation studies on esterquats.
Entry Core Structural Features of the Cation Anion Test Biodegradation [%] Ref
Choline-type esterquats
1 A n = 1, R1=C12H25, R2=C2H4 2Cl OECD 301C 58 * [68]
2 A n=1, R1=C9H19, R2=CH2 2Br OECD 301D 45 ** [19]
3 A n=1, R1=C11H23, R2=CH2 2Br OECD 301D 50 ** [3]
4 A n=1, R1=C9H19, R2=C4H8 2Br OECD 301D 40 ** [19]
5 A n=1, R1=C9H19, R2=CH2OH 2Cl OECD 301C 58 * [60]
6 A n=1, R1=C11H23, R2=CH2OH 2Cl OECD 301C 58 *
7 A n=1, R1=C13H27, R2=CH2OH 2Cl OECD 301C 58 *
8 A n=1, R1=C12H25, R2=trans-CH=CH 2Cl OECD 301C 52 * [68]
9 A n=1, R1=C12H25, R2=cis-CH=CH 2Cl OECD 301C 55 *
10 A n=2, R1=C12H25, R2=CH2OH 2Cl OECD 301C 59 *
11 A n=3, R1=C9H19, R2=CH2OH 2Cl OECD 301C 50 * [60]
12 A n=5, R1=C8H17, R2=trans-CH=CH 2Cl OECD 301C 52 * [68]
13 A n=5, R1=C7H15, R2=CH2OH 2Cl OECD 301C 40 * [60]
14 B n=1, R1=CHCH2 Cl OECD 301F 73 ** [12]
15 B n=1, R1=C(CH3)CH2 Cl OECD 301F 70 **
16 B n=1, R1=C11H23 Cl OECD 301C 78 * [60]
17 B n=1, R1=C9H19 Cl OECD 301D 90 ** [19]
18 B n=1, R1=CHCH2 MCPA 1 OECD 301F 37 ** [12]
19 B n=1, R1=C(CH3)CH2 MCPA OECD 301F 29 **
20 C R1=tallow Cl OECD 301F 91 ** [12]
21 C R1=tallow MCPA OECD 301F 63 **
22 D n=1, Y=H, R1=C11H23, R2=CH3 Br OECD 301D 95 ** [3]
23 E n=1, R1=C12H25 2Cl OECD 301C 52 * [68]
24 F n=1, R1=C10H21 2I OECD 301C 60 ** [80]
25 F n=1, R1=C12H25 2I OECD 301C 70 **
26 F n=1, R1=C14H29 2I OECD 301C 60 **
27 F n=2, R1=C10H21 2I OECD 301C 30 **
28 F n=2, R1=C12H25 2I OECD 301C 45 **
29 F n=2, R1=C14H29 2I OECD 301C 20 **
30 G n=1, Y=CH3, R1=C12H25 R2=CH2 2I OECD 301C 31 ** [81]
31 G n=2, Y=H, R1=C12H25, R2=CH2 2I OECD 301C 25 **
32 H n=1, Y=H, R1=C12H25 I OECD 301C 60 ** [81]
33 H n=1, Y=CH3, R1=C12H25 I OECD 301C 35 **
34 I n=2, m=1, R1=C12H25 2I OECD 301C 60 ** [81]
35 I n=2, m=2, R1=C12H25 2I OECD 301C 29 **
Betaine-type esterquats
36 J n=1, R1=C12H25 Br OECD 301D 85 ** [3]
37 K n=1, R1=C12H25 2Br OECD 301D 55 **
38 L m=7 2Cl OECD 310 31 ** [110]
39 L m=9 2Cl OECD 310 39 **
40 M m=7 3Cl OECD 310 41 **
41 M m=9 3Cl OECD 310 42 **
42 M m=11 3Cl OECD 310 52 **
* for 14 days; ** for 28 days; 1 MCPA: 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetate
Table 8. Overview of reported results of antimicrobial activity of esterquats.
Table 8. Overview of reported results of antimicrobial activity of esterquats.
No Core; Cation Anion Parameter (units) Antimicrobial activity Ref
1 A; R1=C11H23, R2=C8H17 Br IZD 1 (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) C. tropicalis: 15; E. coli: 10; S. aureus: 9 [66]
2 A; R1=C13H27, R2=C8H17 Br IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) C. tropicalis: 13; E. coli: 11; S. aureus: 12
3 A; R1=C15H31, R2=C8H17 Br IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) C. tropicalis: 13; E. coli: 13; S. aureus: 15
4 B; n=1, Y=H R1=C11H23, R2=C5H11 2Cl MIC 2 (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: >512; S. marcescens: >512 [72]
5 B; n=1, Y=H R1=C11H23, R2=C6H13 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: >512; S. marcescens: >512
6 B; n=1, Y=H R1=C11H23, R2=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: >512; S. marcescens: >512
7 B; n=2, Y=H, R1=C9H19, R2=C4H9 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) A. Fumigatus: 18.6; B. subtilis: 21.3; E. coli: 15.9; S. pneumonia: 19.6 [73]
8 B; n=2, Y=H, R1=C9H19, R2=C5H11 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) A. Fumigatus: 15.7; B. subtilis: 19.8; E. coli: 15.3; S. pneumonia: 16.2
9 B; n=2, Y=H R1=C9H19, R2=C6H13 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: 512; S. marcescens: >512 [72]
10 B; n=2, Y=H, R1=C9H19, R2=C6H13 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) A. Fumigatus: 12.9; B. subtilis: 15.9; E. coli: 12.9; S. pneumonia: 15.1 [73]
11 B; n=2, Y=CH3 R1=C9H19, R2=C6H13 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 512; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: 256; S. marcescens: >512 [72]
12 B; n=2, Y=H R1=C9H19, R2=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: >256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: >512; S. marcescens: >512
13 B; n=2, Y=CH3 R1=C9H19, R2=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: 256; S. marcescens: >512
14 B; n=2, Y=H, R1=C11H23, R2=C4H9 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) A. Fumigatus: 17. 8; B. subtilis: 22. 4; E. coli: 16.9; S. pneumonia: 20.6 [73]
15 B; n=2, Y=H R1=C11H23, R2=C5H11 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: 512; S. marcescens: >512 [72]
16 B; n=2, Y=H R1=C11H23, R2=C6H13 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 128; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: >512; S. marcescens: >512
17 B; n=2, Y=H, R1=C11H23, R2=C5H11 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) A. Fumigatus: 17.6; B. subtilis: 19.9; E. coli: 16.9; S. pneumonia: 18.4 [73]
18 B; n=2, Y=CH3 R1=C11H23, R2=C5H11 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: 256; S. marcescens: >512 [72]
19 B; n=2, Y=H, R1=C11H23, R2=C6H13 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) A. Fumigatus: 16.3; B. subtilis: 18.3; E. coli: 15.9; S. pneumonia: 17.3 [73]
20 B; n=2, Y=CH3 R1=C11H23, R2=C6H13 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: 256; S. marcescens: >512 [72]
21 B; n=2, Y=H, R1=C11H23, R2=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) A. Fumigatus: 3.9; B. subtilis: 0.49; E. coli: 15.63; S. pneumonia: 0.98 [73]
IZD (mm) (at 1000µg/mL) A. Fumigatus: 12.6; B. subtilis: 15.4; E. coli: 12.7; S. pneumonia: 14.6
22 B; n=2, Y=H R1=C11H23, R2=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: 512; S. marcescens: >512; [72]
23 B; n=2, Y=CH3 R1=C11H23, R2=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 256; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: 256; S. marcescens: >512
24 B; n=2, Y=CH3 R1=C13H27, R2=C6H13 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 512; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: >512; S. marcescens: >512
25 B; n=2, Y=H R1=C13H27, R2=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: >512; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: >512; S. marcescens: >512
26 B; n=2, Y=CH3 R1=C13H27, R2=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: >512; E. coli: >512; R. rubra: >512; S. aureus: >512; S. marcescens: >512
27 C; n=1, R1=C12H25 2I MIC (µg/mL) A. niger: 400; B. subtilis: 10; C. albicans: 400; E. coli: 25; M. gypseum: 25; M. luteus: 50; P. aeruginosa: 400; P. chrysogenum: 400; S. aureus: 25; S. cerevisiae: 400; S. typhimurium: 100; T. mentagrophytes: 50 [80]
28 C; n=2, R1=C12H25 2I MIC (µg/mL) A. niger: >400; B. subtilis: 5; C. albicans: 400; E. coli: 10; M. gypseum: 400; M. luteus: 5; P. aeruginosa: 200; P. chrysogenum: >400; S. aureus: 5; S. cerevisiae: >400; S. typhimurium: 100; T. mentagrophytes: 200
29 D; n=2, Y=H, R1=C12H25, R2=CH2 2I MIC (µg/mL) A. niger: >400; B. subtilis: 200; C. albicans: >400; E. coli: 400; M. gypseum: 400; M. luteus: 400; P. aeruginosa: 400; P. chrysogenum: >400; S. aureus: 200; S. cerevisiae: >400; S. typhimurium: >400; T. mentagrophytes: >400 [81]
30 D; n=1, Y=CH3, R1=C12H25, R2=CH2 I MIC (µg/mL) A. niger: >400; B. subtilis: 100; C. albicans: >400; E. coli: 200; M. gypseum: 400; M. luteus: 100; P. aeruginosa: >400; P. chrysogenum: >400; S. aureus: 100; S. cerevisiae: >400; S. typhimurium: >400; T. mentagrophytes: 200
31 E; n=1, Y=H, R1=C12H25 I MIC (µg/mL) A. niger: >400; B. subtilis: 2.5; C. albicans: >400; E. coli: 10; M. gypseum: 10; M. luteus: 5; P. aeruginosa: 100; P. chrysogenum: 200; S. aureus: 2.5; S. cerevisiae: 400; S. typhimurium: 200; T. mentagrophytes: 50
32 E; n=1, Y=CH3, R1=C12H25 I MIC (µg/mL) A. niger: >400; B. subtilis: 5; C. albicans: 400; E. coli: >400; M. gypseum: 5; M. luteus: 2.5; P. aeruginosa: >400; P. chrysogenum: 100; S. aureus: 2.5; S. cerevisiae: 400; S. typhimurium: >400; T. mentagrophytes: 400
33 F; n=2, m=1, R1=C12H25 2I MIC (µg/mL) A. niger: >400; B. subtilis: 10; C. albicans: 400; E. coli: 200; M. gypseum: 25; M. luteus: 25; P. aeruginosa: 200; P. chrysogenum: 400; S. aureus: 5; S. cerevisiae: 400; S. typhimurium: 400; T. mentagrophytes: 100
34 F; n=2, m=2, R1=C12H25 2I MIC (µg/mL) A. niger: >200; B. subtilis: 50; C. albicans: >200; E. coli: 200; M. gypseum: 100; M. luteus: 100; P. aeruginosa: >200; P. chrysogenum: >200; S. aureus: 100; S. cerevisiae: >200; S. typhimurium: >200; T. mentagrophytes: >200
35 G; R2=C10H21 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 6.42; P. putida: 12.83 [47]
MBC 3 (µg/mL) E. coli: 12.83; P. putida: 25.67
EC50 4 (µg/mL) E. coli: 8.73; P. putida: 14.89
36 G; R1=C12H25 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 6.77; P. putida: 13.53
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 54.14; P. putida: >54.14
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 10.83; P. putida: 16.78
37 G; R2=C14H29 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 14.24; P. putida: 284.72
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 56.94; P. putida: >56.94
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 53.53; P. putida: 48.97
38 H; R2=C8H17 MCPP 5 MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 74.83; C. albicans: 149.67; P. putida: 299.33 [48]
MBC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 299.33; C. albicans: 299.33; P. putida: 598.67
39 H; R2=C9H19 MCPP MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 76.59; C. albicans: 153.18; P. putida: 306.35
MBC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 306.35; C. albicans: 306.35; P. putida: 612.7
40 H; R2=C10H21 MCPP MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 78.34; C. albicans: 78.34; P. putida: 313.37
MBC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 313.37; C. albicans: 156.68; P. putida: 626.73
41 H; R2=C11H23 MCPP MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 78.34; C. albicans: 78.34; P. putida: 78.34
MBC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 313.37; C. albicans: 156.68; P. putida: 626.73
42 H; R2=C12H25 MCPP MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 20.49; C. albicans: 81.85; P. putida: 81.85
MBC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 163.7; C. albicans: 163.7; P. putida: 327.39
43 H; R2=C14H29 MCPP MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 5.33; C. albicans: 8.54; P. putida: 34.14
MBC (µg/mL) B. subtilis: 21.37; C. albicans: 17.07; P. putida: 85.36
44 I; R2=C10H21 4-CPA 6 MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 15.48; P. putida: 15.48 [47]
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 30.95; P. putida: 30.95
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 16.71; P. putida: 22.9
45 I; R2=C12H25 4-CPA MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 8.09; P. putida: 16.18
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 32.35; P. putida: 32.35
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 20.71; P. putida: 20.71
46 I; R2=C14H29 4-CPA MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 33.76; P. putida: 33.76
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 67.51; P. putida: >67.51
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 62.11; P. putida: 56.71
47 I; R2=C10H21 2,4-D 7 MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 16.34; P. putida: 32.67
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 32.67; P. putida: 65.35
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 18.3; P. putida: 33.98
48 I; R2=C12H25 2,4-D MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 8.52; P. putida: 17.04
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 17.04; P. putida: 34.08
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 15.67; P. putida: 31.35
49 I; R2=C14H29 2,4-D MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 35.48; P. putida: 35.48
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 70.96; P. putida: >70.96
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 45.41; P. putida: 84.44
50 I; R2=C10H21 MCPA 8 MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 15.83; P. putida: 15.83
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 31.65; P. putida: 31.65
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 13.29; P. putida: 21.52
51 I; R2=C12H25 MCPA MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 8.26; P. putida: 16.53
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 16.53; P. putida: 16.53
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 13.22; P. putida: 20.49
52 I; R2=C14H29 MCPA MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 34.46; P. putida: 34.46
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 68.92; P. putida: >68.92
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 60.65; P. putida: 78.56
53 I; R2=C10H21 MCPP MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 16.18; P. putida: 16.18
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 32.35; P. putida: 32.35
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 31.06; P. putida: 26.53
54 I; R2=C12H25 MCPP MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 8.44; P. putida: 16.88
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 16.88; P. putida: 33.76
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 14.18; P. putida: 16.2
55 I; R2=C14H29 MCPP MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 17.58; P. putida: 35.16
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 70.32; P. putida: >70.32
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 67.51; P. putida: 170.87
56 I; R2=C10H21 Clopyralid 9 MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 7.81; P. putida: 15.61
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 31.22; P. putida: 31.22
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 21.85; P. putida: 23.1
57 I; R2=C12H25 Clopyralid MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 8.16; P. putida: 16.31
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 16.31; P. putida: 32.62
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 16.31; P. putida: 11.09
58 I; R2=C14H29 Clopyralid MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 17.01; P. putida: 34.03
MBC (µg/mL) E. coli: 68.05; P. putida: >68.05
EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 41.51; P. putida: 115.69
59 J; X=OCH3, Y= OCH3 Cl EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 0.0056 [56]
60 J; X=H, Y=H Cl EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: >0.0375
61 J; X=OH, Y=H Cl EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 0.0017
62 J; X=OCH3, Y=H Cl EC50 (µg/mL) E. coli: 0.0103
Betaine-type esterquats
63 K; n=1, m=2, R1=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 512; S. aureus: 512 [18]
64 K; n=1, m=2, R1=C10H21 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 128; S. aureus: 64
65 K; n=1, m=2, R1=C12H25 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 256; S. aureus: 128
66 K; n=1, m=3, R1=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 512; S. aureus: 512
67 K; n=1, m=3, R1=C10H21 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 256; S. aureus: 128
68 K; n=1, m=3, R1=C12H25 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 256; S. aureus: 256
69 K; n=1, m=4, R1=C8H17 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 256; S. aureus: 256
70 K; n=1, m=4, R1=C10H21 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 64; S. aureus: 32
71 K; n=1, m=4, R1=C12H25 2Cl MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 128; S. aureus: 64
72 L; n=1, R1=C12H25 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 400µg/mL) B. subtilis: 16; C. albicans: 21; E.coli: 10; S. aureus: 19 [20]
73 L; n=1, R1=C14H29 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 400µg/mL) B. subtilis: 14; C. albicans: 18; E.coli: 11; S. aureus: 16
74 L; n=1, R1=C16H33 2Cl IZD (mm) (at 400µg/mL) B. subtilis: 13; C. albicans: 20; E.coli: 11; S. aureus: 11
75 M; n=1; R1=C12H25 Doc 10 EC50 (µg/mL) Aliivibrio fischeri: 4.61 (5min); 3.47 (15min); 3.19 (30min); Raphidocelis subcapitata: 0.58 [21]
76 M; n=1; R1=C12H25 SCN EC50 (µg/mL) Aliivibrio fischeri: 1.41 (5min); 0.77 (15min); 0.61 (30min); Raphidocelis subcapitata: 0.27
77 M; n=1; R1=C14H29 Doc EC50 (µg/mL) Aliivibrio fischeri: 3.19 (5min); 1.39 (15min); 1.37 (30min); Raphidocelis subcapitata: 0.74
78 M; n=1; R1=C14H29 SCN EC50 (µg/mL) Aliivibrio fischeri: 1.61 (5min); 1.10 (15min); 0.90 (30min); Raphidocelis subcapitata: 0.54
79 N; n=1, R1=C9H19 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: >161.52; E. faecalis: >161.52; P. aeruginosa: >161.52; S. aureus (ATCC33592): >161.52; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 161.52; S. aureus: >161.52 [106]
80 N; n=1, R1=C10H21 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: >168.52; E. faecalis: >168.52; P. aeruginosa: >168.52; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 168.52; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 84.26; S. aureus: 168.52
81 N; n=1, R1=C11H23 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 44.23; E. faecalis: 44.23; P. aeruginosa: 87.76; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 22.47; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 11.23; S. aureus: 22.47
82 N; n=1, R1=C12H25 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 11.68; E. faecalis: 11.68; P. aeruginosa: 23.36; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 5.84; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 2.92; S. aureus: 1.46
83 N; n=1, R1=C13H27 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 6.06; E. faecalis: 12.13; P. aeruginosa: 24.26; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 6.06; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 6.06; S. aureus: 3.03
84 N; n=1, R1=C15H31 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 51.29; E. faecalis: 26.05; P. aeruginosa: 101.76; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 26.05; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 13.03; S. aureus: 13.03
85 N; n=1, R1=C17H35 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 217.52; E. faecalis: 27.84; P. aeruginosa: >217.52; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 27.84; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 13.92; S. aureus: 13.92
86 O; n=1, m=8, R1=C6H5CH2 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: >100.04; E. faecalis: >100.04; P. aeruginosa: >100.04; S. aureus (ATCC33592): >100.04; S. aureus (USA300-0114): >100.04; S. aureus: >100.04
87 O; n=1, m=9, R1=C6H5CH2 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: >103.54; E. faecalis: >103.54; P. aeruginosa: >103.54; S. aureus (ATCC33592): >103.54; S. aureus (USA300-0114): >103.54; S. aureus: >103.54
88 O; n=1, m=10, R1=C6H5CH2 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 107.04; E. faecalis: 107.04; P. aeruginosa: >107.04; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 53.52; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 107.04; S. aureus: 53.52
89 O; n=1, m=11, R1=C6H5CH2 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 55.27; E. faecalis: 55.27; P. aeruginosa: >110.54; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 27.86; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 14.15; S. aureus: 14.15
90 O; n=1, m=12, R1=C6H5CH2 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 28.74; E. faecalis: 14.6; P. aeruginosa: >114.04; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 14.6; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 7.3; S. aureus: 14.6
91 O; n=1, m=14, R1=C6H5CH2 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 7.75; E. faecalis: 1.94; P. aeruginosa: 30.5; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 0.97; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 0.97; S. aureus: 0.97
92 O; n=1, m=16, R1=C6H5CH2 Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 4.1; E. faecalis: 2.05; P. aeruginosa: >128.04; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 0.51; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 1.02; S. aureus: 0.51
93 O; n=2, m=1, R1=C4H9 Sac 11 EC50 (µg/mL) A. fischeri: 248.48 (5min); 103.51 (15min); 68.06 (30min); R. subcapitata: 4.71 [21]
94 O; n=4, m=1, R1=C4H9 Sac EC50 (µg/mL) A. fischeri: 1904.43 (5min); 628.04 (15min); 401.14 (30min); R. subcapitata: 12.83
95 P; n=1, m=5 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: >175.29; E. faecalis: >175.29; P. aeruginosa: >175.29; S. aureus (ATCC33592): >175.29; S. aureus (USA300-0114): >175.29; S. aureus: >175.29 [106]
96 P; n=1, m=6 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: >182.29; E. faecalis: >182.29; P. aeruginosa: >182.29; S. aureus (ATCC33592): >182.29; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 182.29; S. aureus: >182.29
97 P; n=1, m=7 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 189.29; E. faecalis: 47.7; P. aeruginosa: >189.29; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 47.7; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 24.23; S. aureus: >189.29
98 P; n=1, m=8 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 12.56; E. faecalis: 6.28; P. aeruginosa: 98.14; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 3.14; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 3.14; S. aureus: 3.14
99 P; n=1, m=10 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 1.63; E. faecalis: 3.25; P. aeruginosa: 13.01; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 1.63; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 1.63; S. aureus: 1.63
100 P; n=1, m=12 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 13.91; E. faecalis: 27.81; P. aeruginosa: 27.81; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 6.95; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 6.95; S. aureus: 6.95
101 P; n=1, m=14 2Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: >231.29; E. faecalis: >231.29; P. aeruginosa: >231.29; S. aureus (ATCC33592): >231.29; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 231.29; S. aureus: >231.29
102 R; n=1; m=8 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: >245.04; E. faecalis: 245.04; P. aeruginosa: >245.04; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 245.04; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 122.52; S. aureus: 245.04
103 R; n=1; m=9 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 127.77; E. faecalis: 32.71; P. aeruginosa: 127.77; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 32.71; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 16.35; S. aureus: 32.71
104 R; n=1; m=10 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 17.03; E. faecalis: 17.03; P. aeruginosa: 34.05; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 8.51; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 8.51; S. aureus: 8.51
105 R; n=1; m=11 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 8.85; E. faecalis: 17.7; P. aeruginosa: 35.4; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 8.85; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 8.85; S. aureus: 4.42
106 R; n=1; m=12 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 9.19; E. faecalis: 9.19; P. aeruginosa: 18.37; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 4.59; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 4.59; S. aureus: 4.59
107 R; n=1; m=14 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 9.86; E. faecalis: 9.86; P. aeruginosa: 19.71; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 9.86; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 9.86; S. aureus: 4.93
108 R; n=1; m=16 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 82.92; E. faecalis: 42.12; P. aeruginosa: 329.04; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 42.12; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 21.06; S. aureus: 82.92
109 S; n=1, m=5 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 266.82; E. faecalis: 266.82; P. aeruginosa: >266.82; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 266.82; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 67.24; S. aureus: 67.24
110 S; n=1, m=6 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 69.89; E. faecalis: 35.5; P. aeruginosa: >277.32; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 35.5; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 8.87; S. aureus: 17.75
111 S; n=1, m=7 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 9.21; E. faecalis: 9.21; P. aeruginosa: 72.53; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 4.61; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 4.61; S. aureus: 2.3
112 S; n=1, m=8 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 4.77; E. faecalis: 9.55; P. aeruginosa: 19.09; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 4.77; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 4.77; S. aureus: 2.39
113 S; n=1, m=9 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 9.88; E. faecalis: 9.88; P. aeruginosa: 19.76; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 4.94; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 4.94; S. aureus: 2.47
114 S; n=1, m=10 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 10.55; E. faecalis: 10.55; P. aeruginosa: >329.82; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 10.55; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 10.55; S. aureus: 5.28
115 S; n=1, m=10 3Br MIC (µg/mL) E. coli: 44.91; E. faecalis: 22.45; P. aeruginosa: 350.82; S. aureus (ATCC33592): 44.91; S. aureus (USA300-0114): 22.45; S. aureus: 175.41
116 T; R1 = CH3, R2 = C6H13, R3 = CH3, R4 = CH3, n=10 Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis (MTCC121): 7.8; C. aaseri (MTCC1962): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC1637): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC183): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC277): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC3017): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3018): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3958): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC4748): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC7315): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC854): 15.6; C. glabrata (MTCC3019): 15.6; C. krusei (MTCC3020): 15.6; C. parapsilosis (MTCC1744): 15.6; E. coli (MTCC739): 31.2; Issatchenikiahanoiensis (MTCC4755): 15.6; K. planticola (MTCC530): 15.6; M. luteus (MTCC2470): 3.9; P. aeruginosa (MTCC2453): >125; S. aureus (MTCC96): 3.9; S. aureus (mLS16MTCC2940): 7.8 [111]
117 T; R1 = CH3, R2 = C12H25, R3 = CH3, R4 = CH3, n=10 Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis (MTCC121): 15.6; C. aaseri (MTCC1962): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC1637): 62.5; C. albicans (MTCC183): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC277): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC3017): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC3018): 62.5; C. albicans (MTCC3958): 62.5; C. albicans (MTCC4748): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC7315): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC854): 31.2; C. glabrata (MTCC3019): 31.2; C. krusei (MTCC3020): 62.5; C. parapsilosis (MTCC1744): 62.5; E. coli (MTCC739): 15.6; Issatchenikiahanoiensis (MTCC4755): 31.2; K. planticola (MTCC530): 7.8; M. luteus (MTCC2470): 7.8; P. aeruginosa (MTCC2453): >125; S. aureus (MTCC96): 15.6; S. aureus (mLS16MTCC2940): 7.8
118 T; R1 = CH3, R2 = C18H37, R3 = CH3, R4 = CH3, n=10 Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis (MTCC121): >125; C. albicans (MTCC3017): >125; E. coli (MTCC739): >125; K. planticola (MTCC530): >125; M. luteus (MTCC2470): >125; P. aeruginosa (MTCC2453): >125; S. aureus (MTCC96): >125; S. aureus (mLS16MTCC2940): >125
119 T; R1 = C10H20COOCH3, R2 = C6H13, R3 = CH3, R4 = CH3, n=10 Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis (MTCC121): 7.8; C. aaseri (MTCC1962): 7.8; C. albicans (MTCC1637): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC183): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC277): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3017): 7.8; C. albicans (MTCC3018): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3958): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC4748): 7.8; C. albicans (MTCC7315): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC854): 31.2; C. glabrata (MTCC3019): 15.6; C. krusei (MTCC3020): 31.2; C. parapsilosis (MTCC1744): 15.6; E. coli (MTCC739): >125; Issatchenikiahanoiensis (MTCC4755): 15.6; K. planticola (MTCC530): >125; M. luteus (MTCC2470): 1.9; P. aeruginosa (MTCC2453): >125; S. aureus (MTCC96): 3.9; S. aureus (mLS16MTCC2940): 3.9
120 T; R1 = C10H20COOCH3, R2 = C12H25, R3 = CH3, R4 = CH3, n=10 Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis (MTCC121): >125; C. albicans (MTCC3017): >125; E. coli (MTCC739): >125; K. planticola (MTCC530): >125; M. luteus (MTCC2470): >125; P. aeruginosa (MTCC2453): >125; S. aureus (MTCC96): >125; S. aureus (mLS16MTCC2940): >125
121 T; R1 = C10H20COOCH3, R2 = C18H37, R3 = CH3, R4 = CH3, n=10 Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis (MTCC121): >125; C. albicans (MTCC3017): >125; E. coli (MTCC739): >125; K. planticola (MTCC530): >125; M. luteus (MTCC2470): >125; P. aeruginosa (MTCC2453): >125; S. aureus (MTCC96): >125; S. aureus (mLS16MTCC2940): >125
122 T; R1 = C6H11, R2 = C6H11, R3 = CH3, R4 = CH3, n=10 Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis (MTCC121): 7.8; C. aaseri (MTCC1962): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC1637): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC183): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC277): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3017): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3018): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3958): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC4748): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC7315): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC854): 31.2; C. glabrata (MTCC3019): 31.2; C. krusei (MTCC3020): 31.2; C. parapsilosis (MTCC1744): 15.6; E. coli (MTCC739): >125; Issatchenikiahanoiensis (MTCC4755): 15.6; K. planticola (MTCC530): >125; M. luteus (MTCC2470): 7.8; P. aeruginosa (MTCC2453): >125; S. aureus(MTCC96): 3.9; S. aureus(mLS16MTCC2940): 3.9
123 T; R1 = C8H17, R2 = C8H17, R3 = CH3, R4 = CH3, n=10 Cl MIC (µg/mL) B. subtilis (MTCC121): 7.8; C. aaseri (MTCC1962): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC1637): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC183): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC277): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3017): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC3018): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC3958): 31.2; C. albicans (MTCC4748): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC7315): 15.6; C. albicans (MTCC854): 15.6; C. glabrata (MTCC3019): 31.2; C. krusei (MTCC3020): 31.2; C. parapsilosis (MTCC1744): 62.5; E. coli (MTCC739): >125; Issatchenikiahanoiensis (MTCC4755): 31.2; K. planticola (MTCC530): 31.2; M. luteus (MTCC2470): 3.9; P. aeruginosa (MTCC2453): >125; S. aureus (MTCC96): 3.9; S. aureus (mLS16MTCC2940): 7.8
1 IZD: inhibition zone diameter; 2 MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; 3 MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration; 4 EC50: Half maximal effective concentration; 5 MCPP: (R)-2-(4-chloro-o-tolyloxy)propionate; 6 4-CPA: 4-chlorophenoxyacetate; 7 2,4-D: 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetate, 8 MCPA: 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetate; 9 Clopyralid: 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylate; 10 Doc: docusate, bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate; 11 Sac: sacharinate.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated