Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

BWC Confidence‐Building Measures: Increasing BWC Assurance through Transparency & Information Sharing

Version 1 : Received: 11 April 2024 / Approved: 12 April 2024 / Online: 12 April 2024 (14:33:52 CEST)

How to cite: Shearer, M.; Potter, C.; Vahey, R.; Munves, N.; Gronvall, G. BWC Confidence‐Building Measures: Increasing BWC Assurance through Transparency & Information Sharing. Preprints 2024, 2024040851. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0851.v1 Shearer, M.; Potter, C.; Vahey, R.; Munves, N.; Gronvall, G. BWC Confidence‐Building Measures: Increasing BWC Assurance through Transparency & Information Sharing. Preprints 2024, 2024040851. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0851.v1

Abstract

In the absence of a treaty protocol or verification regime, the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC) instituted Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs) as a mechanism to increase confidence in compliance, by enhancing transparency and mitigating ambiguities regarding states parties’ biological activities. While a promising tool to support treaty compliance, low participation, concerns regarding the completeness and accuracy of CBM submissions, a dearth of analysis, and restricted access to many submissions have limited CBMs’ value. Through interviews with 53 international experts—38 from BWC delegations and 15 independent experts—we identified concrete opportunities to increase CBMs’ value while mitigating the burden on states parties. This study supports states parties’ efforts in the BWC Working Group on the Strengthening of the Convention, as part of a series of research on BWC assurance that aims to characterize challenges around BWC verification and increase certainty in BWC compliance.

Keywords

Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention; Biological Weapons Convention; BWC; BTWC; biological weapons; verification; compliance; confidence-building measures; confidence building measures; CBM; CBMs; nonproliferation; nonproliferation policy; arms control; disarmament; weapons of mass destruction; WMD; biology

Subject

Social Sciences, Political Science

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.