1. Introduction
Stingrays of the subfamily Potamotrygoninae are the only taxon within the subclass of Elasmobranchii adapted to survive and reproduce exclusively in freshwater environments. They are endemic to the rivers of South America and are found in almost all countries, except for rivers in Chile, where Brazil stands out for having more incredible wealth [
1]. Currently, the group is composed of 45 species divided into four genera: the genus
Paratrygon (Duméril, 1865), which is considered a species complex, with ten species,
Plesiotrygon (Rosa, Castelo, Thorson, 1987) and
Heliotrygon (De Carvalho & Lovejoy, 2011) with two species each and
Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) which is the most diverse genus with 31 valid species [
2,
3].
Some species present high phenotypic plasticity and wide distribution in the Amazon basin and can be found in all types of water (black, clear, white and intermediate types), such as
Potamotrygon motoro (Müller & Henle, 1841) and
Potamotrygon orbignyi (Castelnau, 1855), other species have specialized physiological mechanisms to interact with the environment where they live, and therefore have a geographical distribution limited to water courses, such as the species
Potamotrygon wallacei (Carvalho, Rosa and Araújo, 2016), which is endemic to the Rio Negro basin, and
Potamotrygon leopoldi (Castex & Castello, 1970) native to the Xingu river [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8].
Stingrays can be found in different types of habitats and substrates, with their occurrence recorded in both lentic and lotic habitats, as well as rocky, sandy, muddy or leaf litter bottoms [
9,
10].However, despite the wide variety of habitats, stingrays have a predilection for certain areas, the species
Paratrygon aiereba has a predilection for areas with sandy substrates, on the other hand,
Potamotrygon motoro can live in intermediate areas between igapós and beaches, with muddy bottoms [
11].
Elasmobranchs are predators in almost all environments where they live and play an essential role in the energy flow between trophic levels [
12]. Regarding reproductive aspects, in Amazonian elasmobranchs, the seasonal hydrological cycle of river floods and droughts influences reproduction [
13], but, in general, they have similar biological characteristics to marine elasmobranchs, such as low fecundity, slow growth, great longevity, complex reproduction patterns and late sexual maturation, these aspects result in low rates of population renewal and greater vulnerability to overfishing and environmental changes [
14,
15,
16]. Furthermore, constant accidents and injuries involving stingray stingers have driven the practice of negative fishing, which consists of capturing animals for mutilation purposes, by removing the tail, or sacrificing it [
17].
In recent years, there have been significant advances in studies of freshwater stingrays, including studies on contaminants [
18]. and determination of stingray meat using low-cost analytical tools [
19]. Still, despite these studies, most Potamotrygonines are listed as data deficient on the IUCN List of Threatened Species due to a lack of information on population rates and geographic dispersion [
20]. This lack of information occurs because these are regions of difficult access and complexity, where the transport of people and cargo is mainly carried out via waterways [
21] and among these locations is the Uatumã river basin, Amazonas, Brazil.
The Uatumã River is part of the complex hydrographic network of the Amazon basin that covers an area of 6,112,00 Km
2, equivalent to 57% of the Brazilian territory [
22]. The Uatumã River is a tributary of the Amazon River, and its total area is around 70,600 Km
2; its sources are located in the Precambrian shield of the Guianas, from where it transports black, acidic waters with a low amount of sediment and nutrients [
22]. Uatumã is a case of how managing natural resources can significantly impact the ecosystem, as the Balbina Hydroelectric Plant (BHP) was installed on this river between 1983 and 1987, which flooded an area of more than 3000 km² of forests [
23]. Of the Uatumã basin area, around 18,862 Km
2 represents the contribution basin of the HPP [
22]. Due to the scarcity of information on the presence of elasmobranchs in the Uatumã River, the present work aims to record the occurrence of freshwater stingrays in the Uatumã River basin to expand knowledge about their geographic distribution.
2. Materials and Methods
The research was carried out upon release from the Biodiversity Authorization and Information System (SISBIO) following Normative Instruction Ordinance ICMBio nº748/2022. Number: 76127-4 and by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Amazonas (2019/010.02.0905). The study is being developed following the regulations of the ethical principles in animal experimentation considered by the National Animal Control Council Animal Experimentation – CONCEA.
The collections took place in the Uatumã river basin, the northeastern region of the State of Amazonas, Brazil, with points in the municipalities of Presidente Figueiredo (PF), Itapiranga (ITA) and São Sebastião do Uatumã (SSU) (
Figure 1). The collections followed the direction of the river that goes from north to south, starting in Presidente Figueiredo, then Itapiranga, and finally, São Sebastião do Uatumã, which was the closest collection point to the mouth of the Uatumã River, on the Amazon River. In Presidente Figueiredo, collections took place in an area that was impacted by the construction of the Balbina Hydroelectric Plant.
The capture of stingrays occurred through fishing at night using a hand net. After capture, to avoid possible accidents with stingers, the rays were anesthetized through immersion baths in plastic pockets with eugenol (200 μL.L
-1) and then mechanical containment of the stinger was performed using forceps, and subsequently, procedures were carried out to obtain biometric data, the disc width – DW and total length – TL were measured using a measuring tape (
Figure 2) and the weight was checked using a portable scale.
From the values recorded for the disc width – DW, the developmental stage of the captured stingrays was determined; for the
Potamotrygon motoro stingray, the recommendations of Araújo [
24] were followed; for
Potamotrygon scobina and
Potamotrygon orbignyi, the recommendations of Acosta-Santos et al. [
25] and Lasso et al. [
26], respectively, for specimens of the genus
Paratrygon, data from the species
Paratrygon aiereba described by Araújo [
27] were used.
For identification, the key proposed by Rosa and Carvalho [
28] was used, verifying five characteristics: 1) Disc shape; 2) Pattern of the ventral color of the disc; 3) Dorsal color pattern of the disc; 4) Absence or presence of the labial groove; 5) distribution pattern of spines on the tail. In addition, sexing was also carried out based on observation of the presence or absence of claspers.
5. Conclusions
In general, the present work adds knowledge for the characterization of the stingray population in the Uatumã River region and the Amazon region, contributing to the increase in the collection of knowledge related to the geographic distribution of freshwater elasmobranchs.
Although only four species were collected, the high degree of polychromatism found in the color pattern of the rays was notable since the color is related to adaptation processes related to the characteristics of the species, such as eating habits, hunting and escaping from threats [
38]. Furthermore, the high rate of young individuals collected reflects the capture method used in this study.
The study provides preliminary information on the characteristics of freshwater stingray species that may occur in the Uatumã River. Furthermore, new research is necessary to improve the identification of specimens to determine the diversity and elucidate aspects related to the biology of elasmobranchs present in the Uatumã River Basin.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Maria Gomes and Adriano Oliveira.; methodology, Maria Gomes, Maiko Ribeiro, Cristiane Guimarães and Tiago Nóbrega; formal analysis, Maria Gomes, Rayana Paixão, Cristiane Guimarães and Adriene Santos.; data curation, Maria Gomes, Adriene Santos, Maiko Ribeiro, Tiago Nóbrega and Adriano Oliveira; writing, Maria Gomes, Paulo Aride and Rayana Paixão; writing – review and editing, Adriano Oliveira; supervision, Paulo Aride and Adriano Oliveira.; acquisition of financing, Adriano Oliveira.
Figure 1.
Geographic location of the Uatumã River with an indication of sampling points in the municipalities of Presidente Figueiredo, Itapiranga, and São Sebastião do Uatumã, a northeastern region of Amazonas, Brazil.
Figure 1.
Geographic location of the Uatumã River with an indication of sampling points in the municipalities of Presidente Figueiredo, Itapiranga, and São Sebastião do Uatumã, a northeastern region of Amazonas, Brazil.
Figure 2.
Measurement of biometric parameters in Paratrygon spp. collected in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a) measurement of total length; (b) measurement of disc width.
Figure 2.
Measurement of biometric parameters in Paratrygon spp. collected in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a) measurement of total length; (b) measurement of disc width.
Figure 3.
Indication of stingrays captured in the municipalities of Presidente Figueiredo (PF), São Sebastião do Uatumã (SSU) and Itapiranga (ITA), in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern region of Amazonas, Brazil.
Figure 3.
Indication of stingrays captured in the municipalities of Presidente Figueiredo (PF), São Sebastião do Uatumã (SSU) and Itapiranga (ITA), in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern region of Amazonas, Brazil.
Figure 4.
Specimens of P. orbignyi were collected in the Uatumã River, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a), (b) P. orbignyi with a reticulated color pattern; (c) P. orbignyi with a brownish background; (d) P. orbignyi with a black background.
Figure 4.
Specimens of P. orbignyi were collected in the Uatumã River, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a), (b) P. orbignyi with a reticulated color pattern; (c) P. orbignyi with a brownish background; (d) P. orbignyi with a black background.
Figure 5.
Specimens of Potamotrygon motoro collected in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a) P. motoro with tricolor ocelli captured in ITA and SSU; (b) P. motoro with bicolor ocelli captured in PF; (c) P. motoro with yellow ocelli captured in ITA and SSU; (d) P. motoro with a less common pattern for the species, collected at the point in ITA.
Figure 5.
Specimens of Potamotrygon motoro collected in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a) P. motoro with tricolor ocelli captured in ITA and SSU; (b) P. motoro with bicolor ocelli captured in PF; (c) P. motoro with yellow ocelli captured in ITA and SSU; (d) P. motoro with a less common pattern for the species, collected at the point in ITA.
Figure 6.
Specimens of Potamotrygon scobina collected in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a) Specimen collected in ITA; (b) Specimen collected in PF.
Figure 6.
Specimens of Potamotrygon scobina collected in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a) Specimen collected in ITA; (b) Specimen collected in PF.
Figure 7.
Specimens of the genus Paratrygon captured in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a) Specimen captured at the SSU point; (b) Copy collected in ITA and SSU; (c) Young specimen collected in ITA and SSU; (d) Subadult specimen collected in ITA and SSU.
Figure 7.
Specimens of the genus Paratrygon captured in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas, Brazil. (a) Specimen captured at the SSU point; (b) Copy collected in ITA and SSU; (c) Young specimen collected in ITA and SSU; (d) Subadult specimen collected in ITA and SSU.
Table 1.
Values of biometric parameters of stingrays captured in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas region, Brazil.
Table 1.
Values of biometric parameters of stingrays captured in the Uatumã river basin, northeastern Amazonas region, Brazil.
Locality |
Species |
Development stage |
Sex |
n |
DW (cm) |
TL (cm) |
Weight (g) |
PF |
P. orbignyi |
Young |
M F
|
18 15 |
19.0 ± 2.69 20.0 ± 2.27 |
33 ± 2.79 34 ± 3.69 |
384 ± 101.9 420 ± 139.7 |
Adult |
M F |
2 3 |
24.0 ± 0.0 24.0 ± 0.0 |
38.5 ± 0.70 42.0 ± 1.52 |
625.0 ± 7.07 683.0 ± 110.1
|
P. motoro |
Young |
M |
1 |
21.0 |
32.0 |
570.0 |
P. scobina |
Adult |
M |
1 |
23.0 |
44.0 |
470.0 |
ITA |
P. orbignyi |
Neonate |
F
|
1 |
7.5 |
13.0 |
270.0 |
Young |
F
|
3 |
24.7 ± 3.5 |
45.5 ± 3.5 |
660.0 ± 266.3 |
P. motoro |
Neonate |
M
|
1 |
8.0 |
- |
310.0 |
Young |
M F
|
1 3
|
24 21.7 ± 3.05 |
43 41 ± 9.64 |
530 433.5 ± 179.2 |
Adult |
M |
1 |
41.5 |
51.0 |
570.0 |
P. scobina |
Neonate
Adult |
F
M
|
1
1 |
11.0
24.8 |
21.5
47.0 |
590.0
480.0
|
Paratrygon spp. |
Subadult |
M |
1 |
45.0 |
57.0 |
3,100.0 |
SSU |
P. orbignyi |
Young |
F |
2 |
20.0 ± 4.2 |
37.0 ± 4.2 |
310.0 ± 169.7 |
P. motoro |
Young |
M F |
2 3 |
23 ± 1.0 31 ± 2.82 |
47.3 ± 6.07 53.05 ± 13.4 |
436.6 ± 49.3 1,075 ± 233.3 |
Paratrygon spp. |
Young
Subadult |
M F
F |
2 6 |
23 ± 1.41 23.21 ± 1.54 |
40.75 ± 12.3 45 ± 8.83
44.0 |
435 ± 35.35 425 ± 103.2
1,330.0 |
1 33.0 |