Although many recent papers continue to refer to “modulation of sarcomere contractility” with small molecules acting at sarcomere proteins as a new or recent therapeutic opportunity [
73,
74,
75,
76], research in this area began more than 40 years ago. Solaro and Ruegg introduced a research direction in development of agents with the idea that small molecules can enter the intracellular space and bind directly to myofilament regulatory proteins inducing an increase in sarcomere response to Ca
2+ [
77]. Support of this hypothesis came with experiments reported by Solaro et al. reported enantiomeric separation of the effects of the thiadiazinone (+/-) EMD57033 with only the (+) enantiomer active in increasing myocyte contractility, myofilament response to Ca
2+, cTnC Ca-binding, and thin filament sliding in the motility assay [
78]. These data provided proof of principle for targeting sarcomere proteins in HF [
78]. Solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies of stereospecific interactions correlated the enantiomeric separation by demonstrating functionally significant key interactions of only the EMD (+) chiral group deep in a hydrophobic of cTnC [
79]. These agents were originally termed “Ca-sensitizers” and more recently as “sarcomere activators.” [
80,
81]. The proposed advantages of this approach included an increase in tension with little or no change in the Ca-transient. This action was described as an energy sparing effect with an increase in tension with no change in oxygen consumption related to the reduction in the load on the sarcotubular Ca-pump. Moreover, unlike conventional inotropes that increase intracellular Ca
2+, the sensitizers were expected to be non-arrhythmogenic. However, this idea has been challenged in studies reporting elevated myofilament Ca-sensitivity may indeed be arrhythmogenic [
82],. Examples of agents targeted to cTnC that progressed successfully through clinical trials are levosimendan (Simdax) developed by Orion Pharma/Abbott Labs [
83,
84] and pimobendan (Acardi; Vetmedin) developed by Boehringer Ingelheim/Nippon [
85]. However, these Ca-sensitizers screened for cTnC binding have off target effects in their pharmacological profile, especially inhibition of phospho- diesterase III (PDE III) [
85,
86,
87,
88]. This pleiotropic property led to designation of pimobendan and levosimendan as inodilators [
89,
90]. However, with PDE III inhibition there are elevations in HR, which has the concern of being arrhythmogenic, especially in compromised cardiac function [
8]. In view of this concern, continued efforts to develop sarcomere activators ruled out agents with PDE III inhibition. Reports in the literature have generated mixed results on the efficacy of pimobendan and levosimendan in DCM. The inodilator pimobendan was reported to be of benefit in the cTnT-ΔK210 DCM mouse model despite the lack of evidence that there was an increase in myofilament Ca-response [
91,
92]. In a recent study employing this model [
91], there was a prevention of cardiac remodeling in compensated HF with a significant increase in life span regardless of the stage of treatment. However, at end-stage there was an increase in sudden death. In contrast, pimobendan (marketed as Vetmedin®) is a common treatment meeting with success in dogs with DCM of various etiologies [
93]. Whatever the case, with the lack of a consensus on the effects of cAMP dependent phosphorylation of cMyBP-C and cTnI the risk/benefit of the inodilators is not clear.