1. Introduction
Universitas Indonesia (UI) initiated world university rankings in 2010, later known as the UI Green Metric World University Rankings, to measure campus sustainability efforts. It was intended to create an online survey to portray sustainability policies and programs for universities around the world [
1,
2,
3,
4].
The UI Green Metric conceptual framework of environment, economy, and equity served as a general foundation for our rankings at Mahasarakham University. The rating criteria and indicators are meant to be universally applicable. The indicators and weightings were created with as little bias as possible. Data collection and submission are simple tasks that take a modest amount of staff time to complete. The 2010 edition of the UI Green Metric included 95 institutions from 35 different countries, including 18 from the United States, 35 from Europe, 40 from Asia, and 2 from Australia. Last year, there were 1,183 colleges from 85 different nations that took part in 2023 [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10]. This demonstrates that UI Green Metric is the first and only university rankings system in the world that considers sustainability, as shown in
Figure 1.
The rankings are intended to support scholarly discussions on campus greening and sustainability in education. They encourage social change spearheaded by universities with an eye on sustainability aims and serve as a tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) all over the world to analyze their own on-campus sustainability. Governments, local and international environmental organizations, and the general public should be made aware of campus sustainability initiatives. Key points in 2023 were “Innovation, Impacts, and Future Direction of Sustainable Universities." We would like to focus on universities’ efforts to continue their sustainability programs and policies, innovation, impact, and future direction to become sustainable universities based on UI Green Metrics and SDGs [
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16].
The green university ranking initiative began in 2010, with a total score of 10,000 points divided into six components: Setting and Infrastructure (SI), Energy and Climate Change (EC), Waste Management (WS), Water Usage (WR), Transportation (TR), and Education and Research (ED). Education and research are particularly crucial dimensions as they significantly drive the advancement of universities in Thailand, aligning with the criteria for assessing the quality assurance of education in the country [
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27,
28].
Mahasarakham University is a state university with missions in education management, research, academic services, and cultural preservation. Currently, it offers education at all higher levels, including undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral programs. The university continuously develops new sustainable undergraduate programs and supports research funding to enhance its ability to create new innovations that benefit both the community and society. Mahasarakham University drives its education and research operations continuously under sustainable principles, with a total of 55 sustainable programs out of a total of 95 programs [
29,
30].
Mahasarakham University has been participating in the Green University Ranking since 2011. Education and research data are crucial for assessing the quality of education according to Thai standards and can also be used for the UI Green Metric World University Ranking. Therefore, Mahasarakham University's strengths lie in its adherence to Thai national curriculum standards and its alignment with the criteria for Green University Ranking assessments in education and research. The university's sustainable education and research operations aim to develop the university with the vision of becoming a leading university in Asia. This vision is pursued through missions and strategic plans that align with sustainable education and research initiatives. These initiatives include, producing graduates aligned with global societal needs; conducting research and innovation to achieve international excellence, providing academic services to meet the demands of industry and society, preserving and promoting Isaan culture internationally and managing personnel for university excellence. These five strategic thrusts drive the university's efforts to achieve the set goals for each indicator in education and research according to the Green University Ranking criteria [
31,
32,
33].
To achieve sustainable development, Mahasarakham University must conduct budget analysis and assess activities, projects, and outcomes in education and research each year. This process enables the university to review and improve operations in the following year in line with the criteria and indicators of the Green University Ranking assessment. It allows for accurate adjustments according to the standards, resulting in improved assessments of education and research activities. Additionally, analyzing past operational activities each year helps extract valuable lessons learned, leading to effective adjustments in the university's development strategies as outlined in its objectives.
Therefore, this research aims to collect and analyze retrospective data from the past three years to derive insights and lessons learned. These insights will guide the university in developing strategies that will contribute to its advancement according to the criteria of the Green University Ranking in the upcoming years, ensuring sustainable development for Mahasarakham University.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Area
Mahasarakham University (MSU), Khamriang Campus was set up in Kantarawichai District, approximately seven kilometers from the original campus, with 17 faculties, 2 colleges, and 1 school currently operating. MSU has been widely recognized as one of Thailand’s fastest-growing universities. The total enrollment has also increased, from fewer than 10,000 in its earlier years to more than 40,000 students at present. Many faculty buildings have been constructed on the Khamriang campus, which is now the administrative and academic center. The total area of the main campus (Khamriang) is 1,697,600 m
2, as shown in
Figure 2 and
Figure 3.
2.2. Methodology
2.2.1. The Criteria
In 2023, categories and the weighting of points were modified to accommodate new questions and are shown in
Table 1 and
Table 2.
2.2.2. Scoring
Scoring for each item was numeric so that our data could be processed statistically. Scores were simple counts of things or responses on a scale of some sort.
2.3. Educational and Research Operations
Operation according to the green university ranking criteria for education and research involved defining the steps for operating according to the Deming cycle and observing four steps: Plan-Do-Check-Act, as expanded upon below [
34].
2.3.1. Plan
The operation of green university ranking in the areas of education and research at Mahasarakham University involved the establishment of policies and strategic plans for university development. These plans were aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and key global university ranking indicators [
35,
36]. Furthermore, the university has devised annual operational plans that correlate with the criteria for assessing green university rankings in education and research. Following the establishment of performance indicators as per these operational plans, the university has conducted analyses to assess alignment between the evaluation criteria in education and research. This analysis serves as a conceptual framework for guiding activities related to green university ranking. The university has set targets for each indicator based on the scoring criteria, planned statistical data collection procedures; it has analyzed data according to predetermined criteria and summarized operational data before integrating it into the system in sequence, as illustrated in
Figure 4.
2.3.2. Do
Mahasarakham University has actively pursued green university ranking initiatives in education and research, with the university administration, including the president and administrative faculty, playing a pivotal role in driving these efforts alongside the university's development policies. This involvement includes setting performance indicators aligned with operational plans that correlate with green university ranking activities. Internal university faculties and departments collaborate to achieve the objectives outlined in the university's operational plans. As a result of these collaborative efforts, the university has achieved success in various aspects of green university ranking criteria, particularly in areas related to sustainable curriculum development, research funding from various sources, dissemination of academic publications on sustainability, organization of sustainability-related activities aligned with assessment indicators used in green university ranking assessments conducted by student organizations and clubs, sustainable arts and cultural projects, as well as international sustainability initiatives. The university's achievements in these areas are attributed to the cooperation of faculty, staff, and students from all faculties and departments, ensuring that activities align with education and research evaluation criteria and achieve the specified goals.
2.3.3. Check
Each year, the performance of education and research initiatives is evaluated through meetings to review and assess against set objectives. This process involves analyzing the progress made toward the predetermined goals outlined in the continuous operational plans. Oversight and monitoring of green university ranking efforts are carried out by the Green University Development and Environmental Conservation Committee, which comprises university administrators and representatives from various departments involved in overseeing the progress toward set goals. Additionally, Mahasarakham University tracks and drives green university ranking activities through the Buildings and Facilities Management Office and the Green University Ranking Operations Committee. These efforts ensure that reporting on green university ranking outcomes in education and research adheres to the established criteria, ensuring accuracy, completeness and coverage of all indicators in reporting and data entry into the system.
2.3.4. Action
Adjustments to operational procedures following evaluations are determined by the Green University Development and Environmental Conservation Committee. This committee evaluates the performance and green university ranking outcomes in education and research from the previous year. They analyze the progress made and identify areas where objectives have not been met. Additionally, the committee responsible for education and research operations annually reviews and studies the evaluation criteria for each indicator according to the Green University Ranking Assessment Handbook. This ensures that reporting is accurate and comprehensive, meeting the evaluation criteria effectively.
2.4. Data Preparation for Submission to the System
2.4.1. Data Preparation
In preparation for the green university ranking in education and research, data collection efforts for the year 2023 were undertaken. This involved gathering information on courses offered within the university, research funding to support university development, and activities related to sustainability. Personnel at all levels within faculties and departments contributed to driving these efforts forward. Additionally, student involvement was solicited, particularly from those engaged in research related to green university ranking in education and research. They participated in analyzing data for each indicator, compiling reports on relevant activities related to green university ranking in education and research, and collectively analyzing the progress made to ensure alignment with the criteria for green university ranking in education and research. This collaborative effort aimed to achieve the specified goals effectively.
2.4.2. Data Submission System Integration
Mahasarakham University successfully entered the green university ranking data into the ranking system by the designated deadline of October 31, 2023. This involved recording operational data along with supporting information used as references for the performance indicators in each aspect, in accordance with the green university ranking criteria.
3. Results and Discussion
Since 2011, Mahasarakham University has actively participated in university rankings and has consistently achieved scores according to the green university ranking criteria. In 2015, the UI Green Metric introduced revised evaluation criteria, categorizing them into six aspects. Mahasarakham University's performance in education and research, as per the green university ranking criteria, aligned with the university's sustainable development strategies. Performance indicators were established based on the university's annual operational plans, and activities were carried out according to these plans and allocated budgets to achieve set objectives, as outlined in
Table 3.
The results of Mahasarakham University's efforts in education and research, as per the green university ranking criteria, are presented as follows.
Mahasarakham University has been driving operations in line with the annual operational plans, guided by the university's strategies, particularly focusing on producing graduates to meet global societal needs. This aligns with the green university ranking criterion No. 1, which measures the proportion of sustainable curriculum offerings to the total number of programs. The performance outcomes over the past three years are illustrated in
Figure 6.
From Figure 6, it is evident that Mahasarakham University has had sustainable curriculum offerings in the past and continues to develop and add new programs consistently. The university has been actively developing and refining its curriculum offerings based on quality assurance criteria, particularly during the period from 2021 to 2023. There has been a continuous increase in the number of new and sustainable programs each year. In 2021, the university had a total of 91 programs, with 49 being sustainable. By 2023, the total number of programs had increased to 95, with the highest number of sustainable programs being 55. This increase is attributed to the university's efforts in curriculum improvement to align with the annual operational plans. The addition of new programs, sandbox programs, and international collaborations has strengthened the university's ability to offer internationally competitive education and teaching management.
When comparing with other universities, it is found that Kasetsart University, which offers teaching management in subjects similar to Mahasarakham University, has a total of 99 programs, with 68 being sustainable. Kasetsart University has set its operational plan for 2023 under Strategy 1: Creative Earth Sciences for Sustainable Development of the Country. As a result of collaboration from alumni, entrepreneurs, government agencies, and the private sector, 21 new programs were introduced in 2023, reflecting an increased budget allocation for curriculum development. Kasetsart University allocated approximately 279.8 million baht for the development of new programs. In contrast, Mahasarakham University has a more limited budget allocation for the development of new and sustainable programs, which is lower than that of Kasetsart University.
- 2.
Research funding per Sustainable Research Fund
Mahasarakham University has established strategic priorities to foster research and innovation for international excellence. The university aims to develop the potential of researchers and the research infrastructure within the organization to drive towards becoming a leading research university globally. This is pursued by advancing key performance indicators according to the annual operational plan that aligns with the criteria for assessing sustainable research funding in the Green University assessment. The research funding includes both internal university funds that support researchers in developing and advancing research as well as external funding support. The performance over the past 3 years is illustrated in Figure 7.
From Figure 7, shows the proportion of sustainable research funding to total research funding from 2021 to the present, including support from both internal university funds and external sources. This continuous support has facilitated the ongoing development of research and innovation [
37,
38]. As depicted in the figure, Mahasarakham University received its highest research funding in 2022, totaling
$18,555,100, primarily from the Thai government to revitalize the grassroots economy and communities in the agricultural sector, including state-owned enterprises. Conversely, in 2021, the university received its lowest research support, amounting to
$1,255,088, largely due to the impact of the COVID-19 situation. The fluctuations in research funding reflect the adjustments made in response to the changing circumstances brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic.
When compared to other universities, it is found that Kasetsart University, which operates in a similar capacity to Mahasarakham University, received research funding of $88,280,000 in 2023. Additionally, it set a target of producing 300 research outputs in the same year. Kasetsart University is among the institutions that received the highest government funding in 2023, totaling 5,077,400,000 Baht, with 829,900,000 Baht allocated specifically for research support. This amount is significantly higher than the funding received by Mahasarakham University from the government (approximately five times higher).
- 3.
Number of sustainable publications
Mahasarakham University sets performance indicators according to its annual operational plan, aiming to generate high-quality research and innovations that are internationally recognized, thereby propelling it towards becoming a leading research university on a global scale. The outcomes of its efforts are reflected in the number of sustainable research publications related to sustainability over the past three years, as shown in
Table 4.
Table 4 illustrates the number of academic research publications related to sustainability from 2021 to 2023 on google scholar website, showing a consistent increase in the number of publications in alignment with the university's annual operational plan. In pursuit of Strategy 2, to create research and innovation excellence at the international level, Mahasarakham University has seen a continuous rise in the number of publications related to sustainability. The highest number of academic research publications related to sustainability was recorded in 2022, with 3,396 publications, while the lowest was in 2021, with 3,120 publications. This trend reflects the adjustments in budget allocation for research and innovation activities due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in a reduction in operational budgets [
39,
40].
When compared with other universities, Mahidol University had the highest number of academic research publications in 2023. They had 1,240 publications related to 'Green and Sustainability,' 3,810 publications related to 'Environment,' 2,950 publications related to 'Renewable Energy,' and 3,650 publications related to 'Climate Change,' totaling 11,650 publications related to sustainability in 2023. This number of academic research publications is significantly higher than that of Mahasarakham University, mainly because Mahidol University boasts a superior research environment. It receives substantial government funding, ranks first in the country, and has a larger research faculty and access to advanced research equipment and facilities.
- 4.
Number of sustainable community service projects organized and/or involving students
Mahasarakham University has set strategic priorities in academic services to meet the needs of both the industry and the community. These priorities are measured according to operational plans aligned with the criteria for assessing green universities in education and research. One of the initiatives is community service for sustainability, which involves organizing and/or engaging students in community service projects. The results of these initiatives over the past three years are illustrated in
Table 5.
Table 5 illustrates the number of community service projects organized and/or involving students from 2021 to 2023, aligning with the university's operational plans in Strategy 3 regarding academic services to meet the needs of both industry and society. From
Table 5, it can be observed that Mahasarakham University has seen an increase in the number of community service projects. In 2022, the maximum number of projects was 6, while in 2023, the maximum number reached 71. This increase reflects the university's increased budgetary support for academic service initiatives.
When compared to other universities, Kasetsart University operates in a manner similar to Mahasarakham University. Kasetsart University sets goals according to its operational plan. In its Strategy 1.3, under the overarching strategy of fostering and supporting community and social development, it aims to involve its staff and students in community development. One of its objectives is to undertake a certain number of projects or initiatives aimed at improving various aspects of community life, such as quality of life, community economy, community learning centers, or environmental conservation. For instance, the University to Tambon (U2T) project targets 20 sub-districts, with 243 projects being implemented (Kasetsart University Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2023, Kasetsart University, 2023).
4. Conclusions
Mahasarakham University has set goals for developing its efforts in university green ranking. Key factors contributing to achieving the set goals include the sustainable university policy established by university management. This policy provides a framework for operational plans, sustainable budget allocations for university development, project activities, and the collaboration of staff and students through various committees. For example, committees responsible for university green ranking initiatives and evaluation criteria, inviting students to participate in research, collaborating with student organizations for sustainability projects, and conducting various advocacy campaigns. Quality assurance processes are necessary during project implementation to ensure clear planning, goal setting, monitoring of key performance indicators, and evaluation of success or failure. This allows for adjustments in future operations to ensure continuous development and achievement of goals across all aspects of university green ranking initiatives.
The continuous development of efforts in education and research for university green ranking is the result of the university's sustainability policy. This policy encompasses activities related to the university's green initiatives and is linked to the university's sustainability-oriented strategic plans. There are 55 courses related to sustainability out of a total of 95 courses offered by the university. Adequate budget allocations for sustainability-related activities further contribute to Mahasarakham University's strengths in research and innovation for sustainability, with 55 research outputs achieved. Additionally, the establishment of research centers fosters collaboration with communities and provides learning opportunities for students. These outcomes stem from the research endeavors of university staff, leading to success in education and research efforts for sustainability.
In addition, Mahasarakham University has continuously developed and improved its operations to meet the criteria for the green university ranking assessment. This involves analyzing performance results from previous years, studying criteria where objectives have not yet been met, and planning adjustments to enhance data collection, analysis, and verification processes. This includes scrutinizing data from each committee responsible for green ranking assessment criteria and ensuring accurate and complete data integration into the system as per the established standards. These efforts aim to achieve the set objectives and foster genuine, sustainable development.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, “W.S., R.T., M.K., S.T., R.N., A.P., O.S. and A.K.; methodology, W.S., R.T., M.K., S.T., R.N., A.P., O.S. and A.K.; validation, A.P. and A.K.; formal analysis, W.S., A.P. and A.K.; investigation W.S. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, W.S., A.P. and A.K.; supervision, A.P. and A.K.; and writing—review and editing, W.S., A.P. and A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was financially supported by Mahasarakham University.
Data Availability Statement
This study did not report any data.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Lauder, A.; Sari, R.F.; Suwartha, N.; Tjahjono, G. Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015, 108, 852–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Q.; Kurnitski, J. Performance based core sustainability metrics for university campuses developing towards climate neutrality: A robust PICSOU framework. Sustainable Cities and Society 2023, 97, 104723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwartha, N.; Sari, R.F. Evaluating UI GreenMetric as a tool to support green universities development: Assessment of the year 2011 ranking. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013, 61, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atici, K.B.; Yasayacak, G.; Yilmaz, Y.; Ulucan, A. Green University and academic performance: An empirical study on UI GreenMetric and World University Rankings. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 291, 125289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragazzi, M.; Ghidini, F. Environmental sustainability of universities: Critical analysis of a green ranking. Energy Procedia 2017, 119, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perchinunno, P.; Cazzolle, M. A clustering approach for classifying universities in a world sustainability ranking. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2020, 85, 106471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nejati, M.; Nejati, M. Assessment of sustainable university factors from the perspective of university students. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013, 48, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ralph, M.; Stubbs, W. Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education 2014, 67, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dagiliūtė, R.; Liobikienė, G.; Minelgaitė, A. Sustainability at universities: Students’ perceptions from Green and Non-Green universities. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 181, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, E.B.; Anufriev, V. P. Towards environmental sustainability in Russia: Evidence from green universities. Heliyon 2020, 8, e04719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abowardah, E.S.; Labib, W.; Aboelnagah, H.; Nurunnabi, M. Students’ Perception of Sustainable Development in Higher Education in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stibbe, D.; Prescott, D. The SDG Partnership Guidebook: A Practical Guide to Building High Impact Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals; The Partnering Initiative and UNDESA UN DESA and TPI, United Nation: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Javed, Y.; Alenezi, M. A Case Study on Sustainable Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harmon, R.R.; Moolenkamp, N. Sustainable it Services: Developing a Strategy Framework. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 2012, 9, 1250014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalamas Hedden, M.; Worthy, R.; Akins, E.; Slinger-Friedman, V.; Paul, R.C. Teaching Sustainability Using an Active Learning Constructivist Approach: Discipline-Specific Case Studies in Higher Education. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sammalisto, K.; Sundström, A.; Holm, T. Implementation of sustainability in universities as perceived by faculty and staff—A model from a Swedish university. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015, 106, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srisakda, N.; Sumitsawan, P.; Fukuda, A.; Ishizaka, T.; Sangsrichan, C. Reduction of vehicle fuel consumption from adjustment of cycle length at a signalized intersection and promotional use of environmentally friendly vehicles. Eng. Appl. Sci. Res. 2022, 49, 18–28. [Google Scholar]
- Nuannukul, W.; Phumiphan, A.; Kangrang, A. Cross-Drainage Culvert Design under Global Climate and Land Use Changes. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2021, 16, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar]
- Lawanwadeekul, S.; Srisuwan, A.; Phonphuak, N.; Chindaprasirt, P. Enhancement of porosity and strength of clay brick fired at reduced temperature with the aid of corn cob and waste glass. Construction and Building Materials 2023, 369, 130547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phumiphan, A.; Kosasaeng, S.; Sivanpheng, O.; Hormwichian, R.; Kangrang, A. An Alternative Approach Using the Firefly Algorithm and a Hybrid Method Based on the Artificial Bee Colony and Cultural Algorithm for Reservoir Operation. Water 2024, 16, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukuda, A.; Srisakda, N.; Ishizaka, T.; Malaitham, S. Impact on fuel consumption reduction of introducing hybrid cars in Bangkok using probe information and mobile fuel measurement. Engineering and Applied Science Research 2017, 44, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phonphuak, N,; Teerakun, M,; Srisuwan, A,; Ruenruangrit, P,; Saraphirom. P. The use of sawdust waste on physical properties and thermal conductivity of fired clay brick production. International Journal of GEOMATE 2020, 18, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phumiphan, A.; Kangrang, A. Development of Decision-Making Support Tools for Future Reservoir Management Under Climate and Land Cover Variability: A Case Study. Int. Rev. Civ. Eng. (IRECE) 2021, 12, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pajardo, E.; Kang, D. Sustainable Development Strategies on Campus: Reduce Water Consumption. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dondapati, S.; Kondagunta, N.; Guthi, V.; Ade, A.; Deekala, R. A comparative study of general waste management practices in a campus of a medical university located in the purview of a municipal corporation of a South Indian state. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health 2018, 5, 5115–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owojori, O.M.; Mulaudzi, R.; Edokpayi, J.N. Student’s Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception (KAP) to Solid Waste Management: A Survey towards a More Circular Economy from a Rural-Based Tertiary Institution in South Africa. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mongkoldhumrongkul, K.; Sukkanta, P. Model of University Development in Thailand 4.0 Era toward “Green Campus Concept”. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2022, 1050, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anwar, N.; Mahmood, N.; Yusliza, M.; Ramayah, T.; Faezah, J.; Khalid, W. Green Human Resource Management for organi-sational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 256, 120401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyer, G.; Dyer, M. Strategic leadership for sustainability by higher education: The American College & University Presidents' Climate Commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017, 140, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phdungsilp, A. Waste Management and Its Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals at Dhurakij Pundit University, Thailand. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives 2022, 2, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakhmetullina, S.; Shaimardanov, Z.; Petrova, O.; Idrisheva, Z.; Kolpakova, V.; Apseitova, A. Green Metrics Questionnaire as the basis of Green University strategy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2023, 1194, 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyadarshini, P.; Abhilash, P. From piecemeal to holistic: Introducing sustainability science in Indian Universities to attain UN-Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 247, 119133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boiocchi, R.; Ragazzi, M.; Torretta, V.; Rada, E.C. Critical Analysis of the GreenMetric World University Ranking System: The Issue of Comparability. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, X.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J. The application of plan, do, check, act (PDCA) quality management in reducing nosocomial infections in endoscopy rooms: It does work. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2021, 75, e14351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sawalkar, R.; Undale, S.; Muluk, S.; Mude, G.; Saxena, V.; Pasumarti, S. Strategic waste management practices for environmental sustainability – a case of Indian university. Management of Environmental Quality 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, Y.; Khandelwal, R. Sustainable waste management strategy for a campus: A case study of JUET, Guna. Management of Environmental Quality 2017, 28, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabija, D.C.; Câmpian, V.; Tiron-Tudor, A.; Stanca, L. The path of universities to sustainability: Students perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonio Manso-Barrio, Borja Moya-Gómez, Andrés Monzón, Luisa Balsero. University Mobility Survey 2021 in Madrid Region (Spain): Facing the challenge of getting responses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transportation Research Procedia 2024, 76, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedford, D. S.; Speklé, R. F.; Widener, S. K. Budgeting and employee stress in times of crisis: Evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2022, 101, 101346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baatwah, S. R.; Al-Qadasi, A. A.; Al-Shehri, A. M.; Derouiche, I. Corporate social responsibility budgeting and spending during COVID–19 in Oman: A humanitarian response to the pandemic. Finance Research Letters 2022, 47, 102686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).