Submitted:
21 March 2024
Posted:
22 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Research Methodology
- The integration of GIS methods will provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the accessibility of the street network in Onaizah City.
- Spatial configuration factors, such as street connectivity, network integration, will have a significant influence on walkability and accessibility.
- The analysis of walkability factors, including land use, activity, heritage assets, and human scale, using GIS tools will contribute to understanding the overall walkability.
3. Literature Review
4. Theoretical Approach
4.1. Walkable Main Streets
4.2. Study Site
4.3. The Main Factors Affecting City Walkability
4.4. Create a Walkability Index
4.4.1. Create a Distance Raster
4.4.2. Rank the Distance
4.4.3. Weight the Variables
5.4.4. Generate the Walkability Index
4.5. Find the Walking Path
5. Finding and Discussion
6. Conclusion and Recommendations
- -
- The findings clarify the factors that influence walkability and provide recommendations to legislators and urban planners on how to increase pedestrian accessibility and connectivity in city centre. The study used multi-criteria decision making analysis by implementing GIS techniques to determine the adequate urban corridors, which is the most practicable for pedestrians in Onaizah City Centre.
- -
- The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used for the relative weights allocated to each criterion in the walkability analysis to demonstrated their significance. Heritage sites received the heighest weight (40.0%), followed by green areas (30.0%), commercial sites, and mosques (15.0% each). The research highlights the need of protecting historical components, making them more accessible, and increasing walkability links between them.
- -
- The availability and quality of green spaces were also identified as key variables in improving walkability. Mosques and commercial sites were determined to be of relatively low value in the overall walkability rating. The findings help to broaden our understanding of walkability in Onaizah City and lay the groundwork for evidence-based decision-making in urban planning stakeholders.
- -
- The findings provided useful insights into the walkability of the research area in Onaizah City Centre as an example for many medium size cities in Saudi Arabia, displaying the lengths of the three urban corridors derived from the walkability assessments. The walking trails begin at various locations and conclude at the city centre. Their lengths range from 1283 to 1507 m, which is consistent with the 15-minute walking norm. Prioritizing variables including mixed land use, density, connectivity, street design, and safety can improve as well.
- -
- Future research should focus on validating the findings and exploring additional dimensions of walkability to further enhance our understanding of pedestrian-friendly cities.
7. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- A. Telega and I. Telega, “Measuring Walkability with GIS — Methods Overview and New Approach Proposal,” 2021.
- F. Fonseca, “Walkable Cities : Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimar ã es, Portugal,” 2022.
- M. AlMuharraqi, G. Sweis, R. Sweis, and F. Sammour. “Factors affecting the adoption of smart building projects in the Kingdom of Bahrain,”. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 62, 105325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O. Klein, F. Escobar, T. Al, and P. Gull, “Computers , Environment and Urban Systems Development of a GIS-based walking route planner with integrated comfort walkability parameters,” vol. 103, no. February, 2023. [CrossRef]
- A. Bartzokas-tsiompras, E. Bakogiannis, and A. Nikitas. “Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings : A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres,”. J. Transp. Geogr. 2023, 111, 103645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- T. Santos, F. Ramalhete, R. Pedro, and N. Pires. “Geography and Sustainability Sustainable living neighbourhoods : Measuring public space quality and walking environment in Lisbon,”. Geogr. Sustain. 2022, 3, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- A. Erath, A. Michael, B. Van Eggermond, S. A. Ordóñez, and K. W. Axhausen, “Introducing the Pedestrian Accessibility Tool Walkability Analysis for a Geographic Information System”.
- M. Jabbari, F. Fonseca, and R. Ramos, “Accessibility and Connectivity Criteria for Assessing Walkability : An Application in Qazvin , Iran,” 2021.
- T. Case, C. Old, and F. Fareh, “The Effect of Spatial Configuration on the Movement Distribution Behavior,” vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 9136–9141, 2022.
- A. Ozbil, J. Peponis, and B. Stone, “Understanding the link between street connectivity , land use and pedestrian flows,” vol. 16, pp. 125–141, 2011. [CrossRef]
- A. Paula, L. Miguel, and J. Manuel, “ScienceDirect How urban form promotes walkability ?,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 27, pp. 133–140, 2017. [CrossRef]
- H. Abusaada, “Can Public Spaces Alleviate Poverty-Related Feelings ? Content,” 2023.
- Y. Lerman, Y. Rofè, and I. Omer, “Using Space Syntax to Model Pedestrian Movement in Urban Transportation Planning,” pp. 392–410, 2014. [CrossRef]
- A. Telega and I. Telega, “Measuring Walkability with GIS — Methods Overview and New Approach Proposal,” 2021.
- F. Fonseca, “Walkable Cities : Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimar ã es, Portugal,” 2022.
- G. Hassanshahi, A. Soltani, and M. Roosta, “ScienceDirect Walking as soft mobility : A multi-criteria GIS- based approach for prioritizing tourist routes,” vol. 12, pp. 1080–1096, 2023.
- P. Sahin, “Analysis of Walkable Street Networks by Using the Space Syntax and GIS Techniques : A Case Study of Çankırı City,” 2023.
- A. A. Bindajam and J. Mallick, “Impact of the Spatial Configuration of Streets Networks on Urban Growth : A Case Study of Abha City, Saudi Arabia sustainability Impact of the Spatial Configuration of Streets Networks on Urban Growth : A Case Study of Abha City, Saudi Arabia,” no. March, 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. O. F. Architecture, “STUDY OF PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT IN RELATION TO SPATIAL CONFIGURATION AND LAND-USE PATTERN IN THE CONTEXT,” no. December, 2016.
- A. O. Kordi and K. G. Ahmed, “Towards a socially vibrant city : exploring urban typologies and morphologies of the emerging ‘ CityWalks ’ in Dubai,” 2023.
- U. Design, “Urban Design Guidelines”.
- J. A. Sobrino, M. Srivanit, and Q. Weng, “Cool Islands,” pp. 1–10, 2017. [CrossRef]
- Y. Jabareen and E. Eizenberg, “Viewpoint The failure of urban forms under the COVID-19 epidemic : towards a more just urbanism,” 2020.
- M. Fazio, N. Giuffrida, M. Le Pira, and G. Inturri, “Planning Suitable Transport Networks for E-Scooters to Foster Micromobility Spreading,” 2021.
- “Assessment of Urban Spaces of Mixed-Use Areas and Their Role in Achieving Social Sustainability in Closed Urban Communities in Greater Cairo,” vol. 7, no. 5, p. 705014, 2023.
- T. Hartig, R. Mitchell, S. De Vries, and H. Frumkin, “Nature and Health,” 2014. [CrossRef]
- A. Ozbil, T. Gurleyen, D. Yesiltepe, and E. Zunbuloglu, “Comparative Associations of Street Network Design , Streetscape Attributes and Land-Use Characteristics on Pedestrian Flows in Peripheral Neighbourhoods,” 2019.
- A. Erturan and S. C. Van Der Spek, “Walkability analyses of Delft city centre by Go- Along walks and testing of different design scenarios for a more walkable environment Walkability analyses of Delft city centre by Go-Along walks,” J. Urban Des., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 287–309, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Y. Jabareen, “Theorizing urban social spaces and their interrelations : New perspectives on urban sociology, politics, and planning,” 2021. [CrossRef]
- M. J. Koohsari, N. Owen, E. Cerin, B. Giles-corti, and T. Sugiyama, “Walkability and walking for transport : characterizing the built environment using space syntax,” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act., pp. 1–9, 2016. [CrossRef]
- J. Lee, “Exploring Neighborhood Unit ’ s Planning Elements and Configuration Methods in Seoul and Singapore from a Walkability Perspective,” 2018. [CrossRef]
- H. Badland et al., “Using simple agent-based modeling to inform and enhance neighborhood walkability,” pp. 1–10, 2013.
- J. M. Cohen, “The Future of Architecture : Measuring the Sustainability of Paradigm Shifting Architectural Interventions The Future of Architecture : Measuring the Sustainability of Paradigm Shifting Architectural Interventions,” 2022.
- K. Zaleckis, S. Chmielewski, and I. Grazuleviciute-vileniske, “Walkability Compass — A Space Syntax Solution for Comparative Studies,” 2022.
- S. Bokharaei and J. L. Nasar, “Investigating effects of environmental physical attributes on neighborhood walkability,” City Environ. Interact., vol. 20, no. June, p. 100114, 2023. [CrossRef]







| Cat | Priority | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heritage sites | 40.0% | 1 |
| 2 | Commercial sites | 15.0 % | 4 |
| 3 | Green area | 30.0% | 2 |
| 4 | Mosques | 15.0% | 3 |
| Walking path | Length (m) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1401 |
| 2 | 1283 |
| 3 | 1507 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).