Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Sustainable Intensification of the Montado Ecosystem: Evaluation of Sheep Grazing Systems and Soil Amendment

Version 1 : Received: 20 March 2024 / Approved: 21 March 2024 / Online: 22 March 2024 (08:15:42 CET)

How to cite: Carreira, E.; Serrano, J.; Shahidian, S.; Infante, P.; Paniagua, L.L.; Moral, F.J.; Paixão, L.; Pinto Gomes, C.; Lopes de Castro, J.; Carvalho, M.; Franco Pereira, A. Sustainable Intensification of the Montado Ecosystem: Evaluation of Sheep Grazing Systems and Soil Amendment. Preprints 2024, 2024031294. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1294.v1 Carreira, E.; Serrano, J.; Shahidian, S.; Infante, P.; Paniagua, L.L.; Moral, F.J.; Paixão, L.; Pinto Gomes, C.; Lopes de Castro, J.; Carvalho, M.; Franco Pereira, A. Sustainable Intensification of the Montado Ecosystem: Evaluation of Sheep Grazing Systems and Soil Amendment. Preprints 2024, 2024031294. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1294.v1

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine how application with dolomitic limestone and grazing type (continuous or deferred) affect sheep grazing location and feed preference when the pasture growth rate is maximum. A 4ha field was divided into 4 plots: P1 and P2- without application of dolomitic limestone, continuous (CG) and deferred grazing (DG), respectively; P3 and P4- with application of dolomitic limestone, DG (1AUE), and CG (2.4 AUE), respectively. In DG, animals were placed and removed from the plots depending on the height of the pasture. In each plot, 12 georeferenced sampling points were identified. Throughout the pasture's vegetative cycle (autumn, winter, spring, and early summer) several measurements of pasture height and cut were carried out. From the beginning of March to the beginning of June, animal behavior was observed, by trained observers, through binoculars on six dates. Animals' activity grazing and location was recorded. The results show that: (i) the application of dolomitic limestone combined with CG provided higher values of pasture height; (ii) there were no significant differences in pasture quality between treatments; (iii) Deferred grazing led to 50% more sheep grazing days than continuous grazing; (iv) there were no significant differences in soil compaction between CG and DG; (v) the type of grazing and the treatment with dolomitic limestone did not seem to change the grazing pattern between treatments. This work contributes to understanding the relationships between different types of grazing in dryland pastures, with and without application of dolomitic limestone, and preferred grazing locations for sheep. This work could help agricultural managers make more informed decisions with the aim of promoting the sustainable intensification of livestock production in the Montado ecosystem.

Keywords

Deferred grazing; continuous grazing; floristic composition; Dolomitic limestone; preferred location; grazing; observations grazing; soil compaction.

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Agricultural Science and Agronomy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.