Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Investigating the Interactions of the Cucumber Mosaic Virus 2b Protein with the Viral 1a Replicase Component and the Cellular RNA Silencing Factor Argonaute 1

Version 1 : Received: 18 March 2024 / Approved: 19 March 2024 / Online: 19 March 2024 (08:06:34 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Crawshaw, S.; Murphy, A.M.; Rowling, P.J.E.; Nietlispach, D.; Itzhaki, L.S.; Carr, J.P. Investigating the Interactions of the Cucumber Mosaic Virus 2b Protein with the Viral 1a Replicase Component and the Cellular RNA Silencing Factor Argonaute 1. Viruses 2024, 16, 676. Crawshaw, S.; Murphy, A.M.; Rowling, P.J.E.; Nietlispach, D.; Itzhaki, L.S.; Carr, J.P. Investigating the Interactions of the Cucumber Mosaic Virus 2b Protein with the Viral 1a Replicase Component and the Cellular RNA Silencing Factor Argonaute 1. Viruses 2024, 16, 676.

Abstract

The cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) 2b protein is a suppressor of plant defenses and a pathogenicity determinant. Amongst the 2b protein’s host targets is the RNA silencing factor Argonaute 1 (AGO1), which it binds to and inhibits. In Arabidopsis thaliana, if 2b-induced inhibition of AGO1 is too efficient it induces reinforcement of antiviral silencing by AGO2, and triggers increased resistance against aphids, CMV’s insect vectors. These effects would be deleterious to CMV replication and transmission, respectively, but are moderated by the CMV 1a protein by sequestering sufficient 2b protein molecules into P-bodies to prevent excessive inhibition of AGO1. Mutant 2b protein variants were generated and red and green fluorescent protein fusions used to investigate subcellular colocalization with AGO1 and the 1a protein, and the effects of mutations on complex formation with the 1a protein and AGO1 were investigated using bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Although we found that residues 56-60 influenced the 2b protein’s interactions with the 1a protein and AGO1, it appears unlikely that any single residue or sequence domain is solely responsible. In silico predictions of intrinsic disorder within the 2b protein secondary structure were supported by circular dichroism (CD) but not by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Intrinsic disorder provides a plausible model to explain the 2b protein’s ability to interact with AGO1, the 1a protein and other factors. However, the reasons for the conflicting conclusions provided by CD and NMR must first be resolved.

Keywords

Intrinsically disordered protein; protein phase separation; protein condensate; protein folding; RNA silencing suppressor regulation

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Virology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.