1. Introduction
Methylene blue (MB) is classified as an organic dye (OD) released as an effluent after various industrial operations and is one of the aquatic environment’s most abundant pollutants [
1]. Dyes are applied to the substrates to give them permanent colour, which is resistant to fading when exposed to water, illumination, oxidizing agents, sweat, and microbial attack [
2]. Because of these qualities, various dyes have numerous applications in textiles, food, rubber, printing, cosmetics, medicine, plastic, concrete, and paper industries [
3,
4,
5]. These industries generate a tremendous amount of wastewater containing carcinogenic and toxic dyes. The effluents pollute water resources, which become unfit for human consumption [
6]. Of all industrial branches, highest quantities of dyes are consumed by the textile industry, with textile dyes being compounds of high complexity and comprising a diverse range of structural groups [
7]. They include multiple structural varieties, for example, acidic, reactive, basic, disperse, azo, diazo, anthraquinone-based and metal complex dyes. Basic dyes are characterized by solublility in water; they carry a positive charge when in a solution and are subject to electrostatic attraction to negatively charged substrates. Cationic dyes are able to hold either a positive charge which is localized on an ammonium group, or the charge can be delocalized over the dye cation’s skeletal structure [
8].
Methylene blue, a cationic dyestuff for which the chemical formula is C
16H
18N
3SCl, is one of the materials most highly consumed in the dye industry, commonly used to colour silk, wool, cotton, and paper [
9,
10,
11].
Due to its potential toxicity, the removal of MB from wastewater is currently considered a matter of necessity. The treatment of textile dyeing wastewater involves the application of numerous analytical techniques, including adsorption, precipitation, membrane techniques, photochemical degradation, and electrolytic treatments [
12]. The processes of adsorption and coagulation result in the creation of large amounts of sludge, while heavy metal ions and inorganic salts are highly resistant to being removed through the processes of oxidation and biodegradation. Large quantities of solvents are consumed in the processes of removing organic pollutants through the extraction-based separation method. Liquid membrane technology, including polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs), can serve as an interesting alternative to conventional separation methods and could potentially help overcome this drawback [
13]. The use of this technology is largely determined by the effectiveness and stability of a polymer membrane material, which depends on the physicochemical properties of the polymer and the ion carrier incorporated in it. Modified polymer materials, i.e. containing immobilized macrocyclic compounds, due to their high efficiency and selectivity, could constitute an attractive approach for toxic dye removal from wastewater.
The PIMs are one of the new type liquid membrane which, due to their structure and high resistance against elution of an ion carrier, are now more often used in a variety of industries for removing dyes and metal ions from aqueous solutions
and upgrading and purifying a variety of elements and chemicals [
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19]. The technology is utilised in a wide variety of applications, including pharmaceuticals, agriculture, industrial chemicals, petrochemicals, the food industry, base metal purification, and precious metal refinement. As a result of the rapid industrial development, connected with the necessity of utilizing (separating) dyestuffs from aqueous solutions, the study of transport and separation of dyes by PIMs was strongly intensified [
8,
20,
21]. The increasing progress (especially in recent years) of studies of macrocyclic compounds as potential receptors of organic molecules in PIMs is determined by their easy syntheses from the commonly accessible materials, high thermal and chemical stability, and the ability for selective complexation of organic molecules.
Designing and synthesis of new generation carriers, particularly calixpyrroles to increase their practical applications have recently received a lot of attention. Calixpyrroles are macrocycles consisting of pyrrole rings linked by tetrahedral configuration of carbon atoms through the pyrrolic 2- and 5-positions [
22]. Ester group-containing calixpyrroles frequently perform cation bonding through the cation’s cooperative interaction with their cavity and the ionic (ester) group. The change in pH causes the ionic interaction to eliminate, thus freeing the cation; such behavior makes the above-mentioned compounds usable as ion carriers. There is no exact relation between the transfer mechanism and the co-transport mechanism, i.e. the ion pair released as a result of opening of ring, is impacted by the changes of the pH value [
16,
22]. Calixpyrroles are good potential complexing agents because of their highly specific ligand properties and potential applications as hosts and sensing agents for various analytes. Additionally, it is possible to easily modify the scaffold of calixpyrroles using a variety of new compounds to enhance their selectivity and specificity for given cations, anions and neutral molecules.
This study aimed to develop and characterize PIM with a cellulose triacetate, meso-tetra methyl tetrakis-[methyl-2-(4-acetylphenoxy)] calix[4]pyrrole and o-NPOE, used as a matrix, as a carrier, and as a plasticizer, respectively. Obtained membrane can be applied to effectively eliminate MB from the aqueous solution. For this purpose, the effect of different parameters on the transport of MB across the PIM, such as various pH or MB concentration of the source phase and acidity of the receiving phase, were studied. The effect of the carrier concentration on the transport processes and characterized the membrane with SEM, ATR-FTIR, and DSC-TG were also investigated.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Reagents
Analytical grade chemicals reagents including sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) were acquired from (POCh, Gliwice, Poland). Analytical grade organic reagents, i.e., methyl-2-(4-acetylphenoxy)acetate, cellulose triacetate (CTA, molecular weight Mw= 72.000 – 74.000), o-nitrophenyl octyl ether (o-NPOE), and dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) (all from Merck Life Science Sp.z.o.o., Poznan, Poland) were used without further purification. Dye - methylene blue (MB) was purchased from Chempur (Krupski Mlyn, Poland). The preparation of all aqueous solutions involved the use of analytical reagent grade chemicals and deionized water (conductivity, 0.10 μS/cm).
2.2. Synthesis
M
eso-tetra methyl tetrakis-[methyl-2-(4-acetylphenoxy)] calix[4]pyrrole (KP) synthesis (
Figure 1) was performed through a pyrrole and ketones reaction, with acids serving as a catalyst. The condensation products were primarily four-membered calixpyrrole ring isomers. The
meso-tetra methyl tetrakis-[methyl-2-(4-acetylphenoxy)] calix[4]pyrrole from pyrrole and methyl-2-(4-acetylphenoxy)acetate according to data available in the literature [
23] have been obtained. Methyl-2-(4-acetylphenoxy)acetate was poured into a round-bottomed flask with pyrrole in dry CH
2Cl
2, methyl-2-(4-acetylphenoxy)acetate. The resulting mixture was subjected to cooling to 0
0C and later stirred for 5 min. Through a 10 min process of bubbling using Ar, the mixture resulting from the reaction was degassed. Afterwards, for another 10 min. in a nitrogen atmosphere, HCl was added dropwise over the mixture. The solution created through this process was subject to stirring for 2 h at 0
0C and then stored overnight at room temperature. After removing the solvent, ethyl acetate was used in order to dissolve the crude product. The resulting solid was subjected to multiple washing cycless using water and dried with MgSO
4. Chromatographic purification (silica gel, chloroform/methanol: 1/1) yielded a white solid (80%). The NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance 3HD 400 MHz spectrometer working at 400 MHz and 100 MHz for
1H and
13C, respectively. NMR spectra were recorded in a chloroform-d (CDCl
3), 99.8% atom %D solution.
The structure of KP was confirmed by 1HNMR (Bruker Advance, 400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K, ppm): 7.53-7.46 (s; 4H, NH); 6.90-6.88 (d, 8H, ArH); 6.69-6.67 (d, 8H, ArH); 5.85-5.66 (d, 8H, PyH); 4.52 (s, 8H, CH2); 1.8 (s, 12H, CH3); 1.2 (s, 12H, CH3) and 13C NMR (Bruker Advance, 101 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K, ppm): δ 168.95, 156.36, 140.73, 136.85, 136.61, 128.47, 113.96, 106.1, 105.49, 77.34, 77.02, 76.71, 67.95, 65.50, 61.34, 58.41, 44.10, 29.69, 29.61, 18.35, 14.18.
2.3. Preparation of PIMs and Stability Test
The preparation of PIMs was carried out following a procedure previously described by Nowik-Zajac [
16]. The following solutions were used in order to prepare PIMs (in CH
2Cl
2 as an organic solvent): cellulose triacetate (CTA) serving a support role,
o-nitrophenyl octyl ether used as a plasticizer, and
meso-tetra methyl tetrakis-[methyl-2-(4-acetylphenoxy)] calix[4]pyrrole (KP) (
Figure 1) performing the function of carrier. The defined CTA solution, plasticizer, and carrier volumes were mixed, and the resulting mixture was transferred to a 5.0 cm glass ring attached to a plate glass using CTA - dichloromethane glue. The glass ring was set aside to rest overnight at room temperature until the evaporation of CH
2Cl
2. By wetting it in cold water, the membrane obtained as a result of this process was detached from the glass plate. The membrane’s effective surface area was 4.9 cm
2. Using a digital micrometer (PosiTector 6000 Advance (USA)), measurement of the membrane’s thickness was performed with an accuracy of 1.0 μm standard deviation over four readings. The CTA membrane’s average thickness was 24 μm.
The PIMs stability was investigated considering the loss of mass, which is related to carrier and/or plasticizer leaching. For that purpose, PIMs were subjected to immersion in 100 mL of ultrapure water and 24 hours of shaking. Prior to and after this procedure, the membranes were weighed, and the weighing data served as a basis for calculating the mass loss. Examination of membrane masses was also performed prior to and after the MB transport.
2.4. Transport Studies
The experiments involving transport were conducted in a permeation cell discussed in our prior study [
16] incorporating a two-compartment cell in which the membrane film was tightly clamped between the source and receiving phases. MB (50 cm
3) served as the source phase, whereas hydrochloric acid (50 cm
3) performed the function of the aqueous receiving phase. The experimental procedures were perfoermed at room temperature (23÷25
0C) and synchronous stirrers were used to agitate both the source and receiving aqueous phases at 600 rpm. Aqueous phase samples were piodically removed through a sampling port using a syringe and were subjected to analysis in order to ascertain the concentration of MB. The acidity and basicity of both aqueous phases were controlled by a pH-meter (multifunctional pH-meter, CX-731 Elmetron, with a combined pH electrode, ERH-136, Hydromet, Poland).
The parameters describing transport such as the rate constant
k, permeability
P, and initial flux
Ji, were calculated from the following relationships [
24]:
where
c is the MB concentration (mol/dm
3) in the source phase at a given time,
c1 is the initial MB concentration in the source phase (mol/dm
3),
k is the rate constant (s
−1), and
t is the transport time (s), V is the volume of the aqueous source phase, and A is the area of the membrane.
To describe the efficiency of MB removal from the source phase, the recovery factor (
RF) was calculated as:
Within the scope of transport experiments, the quantification of MB was performed using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 2401). The findings, on the basis of prior studies concerning methylene blue [
8] there was no effect of the aqueous solution’s pH on the MB absorption of the characteristic band in UV/Vis spectroscopy by UV-Vis at λ= 663 nm.
2.5. Characteristics of Developed Polymer Inclusion Membranes (PIMs)
The thickness of the PIM samples was measured using a digital micrometer (PosiTector 6000 Advance (USA)) with an accuracy of 0.1 µm. The thickness of the membrane was measured 10 times for each case and given as the average value of these measurements, with the standard deviation below 1%. The thickness of membranes before and after transport was found to bethe same. The average PIMs thickness varied of 25 µm. Experimental reproducibility was high with standard deviation below 1% of the measured values.
2.5.1. Morphology
A 5 KV scanning electron microscope - SEM (Quanta 3D FEG, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) (Hitachi S4500) was used to perform the KP network’s membrane morphology analysis. Samples of the membrane were frozen in liquid nitrogen (70 K) and subjected to rapid fracturing. Afterwards, the samples were mounted to metal stubs with the fractured edge using a conductive glue, and further coated with gold using a sputtering method. Then, SEM inspection of the samples was performed at a magnification of approximately 50 μm.
2.5.2. Analysis of Thermal Properties: Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) of PIMs
Thermal analysis of the membranes was conducted using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) incorporating a simultaneous analyzer for DSC-TGA research (STA 409C, Netzsch, Germany) to determine their heat resistance. The analysis was carried out under a nitrogen flow of 100 mL/min and at a heating rate of 10 0C/min. The TGA experiment was performed in a temperature range of 30 – 450 0C, and the samples were placed in sealed, non-hermetic, aluminum pans. The DSC experiments were conducted in a temperature range of 30–450 0C, and the samples were placed in sealed aluminum pans. The TGA analysis was described as a mass percentage change during heating and as differential thermogravimetry (DTG), which made it possible to accurately identify exhibited processes. The DSC analysis was described to indicate phase transition behavior dependent on heating.
2.5.3. Analysis of Structure: Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) of PIMs
The ATR-FTIR spectra were recorded using a Bruker Alpha-PFT-IR device with a diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory and were recorded within a wavenumber range of 500–4000 cm−1.
Figure 1.
Structures of: a) meso-tetra methyl tetrakis-[methyl-2-(4-acetlphenoxy)] calix[4]pyrrole (KP), b) methylene blue (MB).
Figure 1.
Structures of: a) meso-tetra methyl tetrakis-[methyl-2-(4-acetlphenoxy)] calix[4]pyrrole (KP), b) methylene blue (MB).
Figure 2.
The profiles of MB concentrations in the source, membrane and receiving phases during transport across PIM containing KP. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB, pH source phase = 10.0; membrane: 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; 0.050 M KP, receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 2.
The profiles of MB concentrations in the source, membrane and receiving phases during transport across PIM containing KP. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB, pH source phase = 10.0; membrane: 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; 0.050 M KP, receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 3.
The relationship ln(c/ci) vs. transport time of MB across the PIM with KP. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB, pH source phase = 10.0; membrane: 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; 0.050 M KP, receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 3.
The relationship ln(c/ci) vs. transport time of MB across the PIM with KP. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB, pH source phase = 10.0; membrane: 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; 0.050 M KP, receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 4.
The MB transport fluxes vs. carrier concentration in the PIM. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB, pH source phase = 10.0; membrane: 25 mg CTA; 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 4.
The MB transport fluxes vs. carrier concentration in the PIM. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB, pH source phase = 10.0; membrane: 25 mg CTA; 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 5.
The relationship of the initial MB ion flux transport across the PIM vs. pH of the source phase. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB; membrane: 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; 0.050 M KP, receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 5.
The relationship of the initial MB ion flux transport across the PIM vs. pH of the source phase. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB; membrane: 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; 0.050 M KP, receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 6.
The effect of MB concentrations in the source aqueous phase. Source phase: various concentrations of MB, pH source phase = 10.0; membrane: 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; 0.050 M KP, receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 6.
The effect of MB concentrations in the source aqueous phase. Source phase: various concentrations of MB, pH source phase = 10.0; membrane: 2.0 mL o-NPPE / 1.0 g CTA; 0.050 M KP, receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 7.
The recovery factor (RF) of MB vs. the cycle number. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB, membrane: 18 wt.% of CTA, 8 wt.% of KP, 74 wt.% of o-NPOE; receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 7.
The recovery factor (RF) of MB vs. the cycle number. Source phase: 100.0 μM MB, membrane: 18 wt.% of CTA, 8 wt.% of KP, 74 wt.% of o-NPOE; receiving phase: 0.10 M HCl.
Figure 10.
The infrared spectrum of: A. membrane before, and B. membrane after, transport process.
Figure 10.
The infrared spectrum of: A. membrane before, and B. membrane after, transport process.
Table 1.
The effect of the source phase pH on the removal of MB.
Table 1.
The effect of the source phase pH on the removal of MB.
pH of source phase |
Receiving phase |
% Removal of MB |
3 |
0.1 M HCl |
5.48 |
6 |
18.43 |
9 |
74.57 |
10 |
93.10 |
11 |
92.12 |
12 |
91.89 |
Table 2.
The Effect of acid concentration in the receiving phase.
Table 2.
The Effect of acid concentration in the receiving phase.
Concentration of HCl in receiving phase |
% Removal of MB |
0.1 M |
93.10 |
0.2 M |
89.75 |
0.3 M |
88.48 |
0.5 M |
70.58 |
1.0 M |
65.54 |
Table 3.
Interpretation of obtained ATR-FTIR.
Table 3.
Interpretation of obtained ATR-FTIR.
Bond |
Membrane before transport process (A) |
Membrane after transport process (B) |
Typical absorption range [cm-1]* |
Wavenumber [cm-1] |
R-X alkyl halides |
600.50 |
601.53 |
500-680 |
C-H aromatics |
744.94 |
743.91 |
705-745 |
C-H aromatics |
856.37 |
855.34 |
862 |
N-H amines groups |
899.71 |
900.74 |
665-910 |
RCO-OH carboxylic groups RCOOR’ C-O |
1033.84 |
1041.06 |
1000-1320 |
Ar-O-R ethers groups |
1213.37 |
1229.88 |
1220-1260 |
C-H alkanes |
1364.01 |
1352.66 |
1360, second 723 |
RCH2CH3 alkanes CH2. CH3
|
1466.16 |
1466.16 |
1460 |
N-O nitro groups |
1524.97 |
1523.94 |
1520, second 1350 |
C=C alkenes |
1607.51 |
1607.51 |
1611 |
RCOOR’ esters groups |
1741.64 |
1749.90 |
1735 |
-CH2- alkanes C=C CO-OH carboxylic groups dimer OH |
2856.99 |
2855.96 |
2850 2800-3400 |
-CH2- alkanes |
2928.19 |
2926.12 |
2925 |
RCONHR’ |
3437.89 |
3437.89 |
3440 |