Submitted:
10 March 2024
Posted:
11 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Undertaking a comprehensive initial assessment to elucidate the psychomotor behavior exhibited by children with ID, aiming to understand their baseline abilities and needs accurately.
- Conducting an initial psychological analysis through assessments administered by specialized professionals overseeing the study subjects, to gain insights into the cognitive and emotional dimensions of the participants.
- Formulating a comprehensive framework for a holistic approach to psychomotor development and adapted football programs, grounded in primary data derived from the initial assessment. This framework aims to integrate psychomotor interventions with football training in a manner that addresses the specific needs and abilities of participants, fostering their overall development and inclusivity.
- Evaluating the advancements in psychomotor behavior and the level of inclusivity achieved by implementing the training programs over a 36-week period. This assessment seeks to determine whether the integrated approach has resulted in outcomes conducive to social transformation, positively impacting the lives of individuals with ID. Key metrics for evaluation include improvements in psychomotor skills, social interaction.
- Contributing to the promotion of inclusivity for children with mild ID within society and the educational system through the utilization of adapted football and psychomotor training. This involves not only assessing individual progress but also advocating for systemic changes that support the integration and empowerment of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Research Instruments
- Sensamove Balance Miniboard
- 2.
- Optojump Next Optical System
- 3.
- The Witty SEM Intelligent semaphores.
- 4.
- Structured Observation of Interaction Evaluation Test.
2.3. Procedure of Interevention
2.4. Statistical Analysis
- 1.
- Pearson Correlation Analysis
- 2.
- Paired Samples t-Test (One-Sample)
3. Results
4. Disscussion
5. Limitations and Strengths
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bethune-Dix, L.; Carter, E.W.; Hall, C.; McMillan, E.; Cayton, J.; Day, T.; Vranicar, M.; Bouchard, C.; Krech, L.; Gustafson, J.; et al. Inclusive higher education for college students with intellectual disability. In Strategies for Supporting Inclusion and Diversity in the Academy: Higher Education, Aspiration and Inequality; Crimmins, G., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ciolan, L; Nedelcu, A. Shaping the research puzzle in an intervention project. Doing Educational Research: Overcoming Challenges In Practice, 2019, 249.
- Ioan, M.R.; Oravițan, M. Systematic review of the impact of physical activity on depression and anxiety symptoms. J. Phys. Educ. Hum. Mov. 2022, 4, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reichenberg, A.; Cederlöf, M.; McMillan, A.; Trzaskowski, M.; Kapra, O.; Fruchter, E. ; .. ; Lichtenstein, P. Discontinuity in the genetic and environmental causes of the intellectual disability spectrum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016, 113, 1098–1103. [Google Scholar]
- Mocanu, L.; Pradais, D.; Crina, C. Psycho-Pedagogical Characteristics of Children with Intellectual Disabilities. EIRP Proceedings, 2020, 15.
- Valentina, S. , & Daniel, R. 2018. Evaluation of the working groups in the group cohesion perspective, in the project Boboc Camp, 2018. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18, 2134–2138. Available at. [CrossRef]
- Biggs, E.E.; Carter, E.W. Quality of Life for Transition-Age Youth with Autism or Intellectual Disability. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2015, 46, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hafidh, R.; Sharif, M.S.; Alsallal, M. Smart Holistic Model for Children and Youth with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities. 2019 International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering (iCCECE). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, United KingdomDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 130–135.
- Roşu, D. , Cojanu, F., Ştefănică, V., & Enache, S. (2022). Experimental management of work collectives through social and socialization activities. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22, 1742-1747. Available at. [CrossRef]
- Fotiadou, E.G.; Neofotistou, K.H.; Giagazoglou, P.F.; Tsimaras, V.K. The Effect of a Psychomotor Education Program on the Static Balance of Children With Intellectual Disability. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017, 31, 1702–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira Vorkapic, C.; Alves, H.; Araujo, L.; Joaquim Borba-Pinheiro, C.; Coelho, R.; Fonseca, E. ; ..; Dantas, E.H. Does physical activity improve cognition and academic performance in children? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Neuropsychobiology, 2021, 80, 454–482. [Google Scholar]
- Roșu, D.; Cojanu, F.; Vișan, P.-F.; Samarescu, N.; Ene, M.A.; Muntean, R.-I.; Ursu, V.E. Structured Program for Developing the Psychomotor Skills of Institutionalized Children with Special Educational Needs. Children 2024, 11, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pătrășcan, G.; Stefanica, V. Football-specific motor training program adapted to children with SEN aged 16–18. Discobolul—Phys. Educ. Sport Kinetotherapy 2019, XV, 61–66. Discobolul – Physical Education, Sport and Kinetotherapy Journal, XV, no. 1, 23-28. https://discobolulunefs.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Discobolul-No.-55-March-2019.
- Badau, D.; Badau, A.; Joksimović, M.; Oancea, B.M.; Manescu, C.O.; Graur, C.; Cornea, G.G.; Ene-Voiculescu, V.; Cojanu, F.; Stefanica, V.; et al. The effects of 6-weeks program of physical therapeutic exergames on cognitive flexibility focused by reaction times in relation to manual and podal motor abilities. Balneo PRM Res. J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, C.; Neves, J.C.; Damásio, M.J. Empowerment and Well-Being Through Participatory Action Research and Accessible Gaming: A Case Study With Adults With Intellectual Disability. Front. Educ. 2022, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luminiţa, A. E. , & Valentina, Ş. (2017). Comparative study between marketing conducted in two volleyball clubs. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17, 2274-2278. Available at. [CrossRef]
- Winnick, J.P.; Porretta, D.L. Adapted physical education and sport. Human Kinetics, 2016.
- Flint, E.S.; Pearson, A. Examining anxiety and self-confidence for the Special Olympics athlete. North American Journal of Psychology, 2016, 18, 17–17. [Google Scholar]
- History of Special Olympics. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.specialolympics.org/history.
- McConkey, R.; Peng, C.; Merritt, M.; Shellard, A. The Meaning of Social Inclusion to Players With and Without Intellectual Disability in Unified Sports Teams. Inclusion 2019, 7, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pătrășcan, G. & Stefanica, V. (2019)Developing strength and speed in children with special educational needs aged 16–18 in order to optimise adapted football game. Discobolul—Phys. Educ. Sport Kinetotherapy 2019, XV, 23–28. Discobolul – Physical Education, Sport and Kinetotherapy Journal, XV, no. 1(55), 23-28. https://discobolulunefs.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Discobolul-No.-55-March-2019.
- Carter, E.W.; Sisco, L.G.; Brown, L.; Brickham, D.; Al-Khabbaz, Z.A. Peer Interactions and Academic Engagement of Youth With Developmental Disabilities in Inclusive Middle and High School Classrooms. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 2008, 113, 479–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diamond, K.E. Relationships Among Young Children's Ideas, Emotional Understanding, and Social Contact with Classmates with Disabilities. Top. Early Child. Spéc. Educ. 2001, 21, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farmer, T.W.; Hamm, J.V.; Dawes, M.; Barko-Alva, K.; Cross, J.R. Promoting Inclusive Communities in Diverse Classrooms: Teacher Attunement and Social Dynamics Management. Educ. Psychol. 2019, 54, 286–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crnic, K.A.; Neece, C.L.; McIntyre, L.L.; Blacher, J.; Baker, B.L. Intellectual Disability and Developmental Risk: Promoting Intervention to Improve Child and Family Well-Being. Child Dev. 2017, 88, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muntean, R.I.; Ștefănică, V.; Ursu, V.E.; Rusu, R.G.; Man, C.M.; Tomuș, A.M.; Fleancu, J.L.; Radu, P.O.; Popescu, A.N. .; Roșu, D. The Impact of HVLA Manipulations and Therapeutic Massage in Increasing the Mobility of the Lateral Flexion of the Neck. BRAIN. BROAD Res. Artif. Intell. Neurosci. 2023, 14, 266–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanches, I. Compreender, Agir, Mudar, Incluir. Da investigação-acção è educação inclusiva. Revista lusófona de educação, 2005, (5), 127-142.
- Jordan, C.H. Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 2020, 4518-4520.
- Huepe, D.; Roca, M.; Salas, N.; Canales-Johnson, A.; Rivera-Rei, A.A.; Zamorano, L. ; .. ; Ibañez, A. Fluid intelligence and psychosocial outcome: from logical problem solving to social adaptation. PLoS One, 2011, 6, e24858. [Google Scholar]
- Valentina, Ş. (2022). Study on the dynamics of the use of food supplements in amateur sports. 1900; 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunzburg, H.C. The reliability of a test of psycholinguistic abilities (ITPA) in a population of young male subnormals. J. Ment. Subnorm. 1964, 10, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doll, E.A. Vineland social maturity scale: Condensed manual of directions. (No Title), 1965.
- Canlı, U.; Samar, E. Exploring the effect of physical activity level on balance, aerobic performance and cognitive function in young sedentary individuals, 2022.
- Ștefănica, V.; Mihai, I.; Cojanu, F.; Vișan, P.-F.; Roșu, D.; Potop, V. Determining the Changes in Psychomotor Behavior of Adolescents with Special Needs. Rev. Romaneasca pentru Educ. Multidimens. 2024, 16, 46–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magrum, E.D.; Wagle, J.P.; DeWeese, B.H.; Sato, K.; Stone, M.H. The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance. Sports 2018, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roșu, D.; Enache, S.; Ștefănică, V.; Muntean, R.I. Initiation in Kin Ball – Pre and Post Pandemic Effects on Hand Strength, Resistance and Coordination. Preprints 2023, 2023122233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merrell, K.W.; Gimpel, G. Social skills of children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, treatment. Psychology Press, 2014.
- Ursu, V. E.; Rusu, R. G.; Rusu, O. H. Primary Selection in Football and the Role of Small-Sided Games in the Training of 12-14-Year-Old Children. Risoprint Publishing House, Cluj Napoca, 2022. 9: ISBN, 2966. [Google Scholar]
- Rusu, R.G. Criteria and Comparative Strategies in Children’s Football Aged 6-8. Risoprint Publishing House, Cluj Napoca, 2017. ISBN: 978-973-53-2136-9.
- Cleophas, T.J.; Zwinderman, A.H. Modern Bayesian Statistics in Clinical Research; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Dordrecht, GX, Netherlands, 2018; pp. 111–118. ISBN 9783319927466. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Kassab, M.M.; Majeed, A.H. The use of one sample t-test in the real data. Adv. Appl. Stat. 2022, 81, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, S. Psychomotor Therapy and Intellectual Disability in Portugal: from 0 to 100…. International Journal of Psychology and Neuroscience, 2017, 3, 22–37. [Google Scholar]
- Marin, A.; Stefanica, V.; Rosculet, I. Enhancing Physical Fitness and Promoting Healthy Lifestyles in Junior Tennis Players: Evaluating the Influence of “Plyospecific” Training on Youth Agility. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orr, K.; Wright, F.V.; Grassmann, V.; McPherson, A.C.; Faulkner, G.E.; Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K.P. Children and youth with impairments in social skills and cognition in out-of-school time inclusive physical activity programs: a scoping review. Int. J. Dev. Disabil. 2019, 67, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scifo, L.; Borrego, C.C.; Monteiro, D.; Matosic, D.; Feka, K.; Bianco, A.; Alesi, M. Sport Intervention Programs (SIPs) to Improve Health and Social Inclusion in People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2019, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kapsal, N.J.; Dicke, T.; Morin, A.J.; Vasconcellos, D.; Maïano, C.; Lee, J.; Lonsdale, C. Effects of Physical Activity on the Physical and Psychosocial Health of Youth With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Phys. Act. Heal. 2019, 16, 1187–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- M, F.; Santos, S. Adaptive Behavior and Quality of Life of adults with intellectual disabilities: Psychomotor Therapy as support. J. Nov. Physiother. Phys. Rehabilitation 2018, 5, 031–038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellemans, T.; Didden, R.; Visser, R.; Schaafsma, D.; Totsika, V.; van Busschbach, J.T. Psychomotor therapy for anger and aggression in mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: an Intervention Mapping approach. Body, Mov. Dance Psychother. 2018, 13, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biddle, S.J.H.; Asare, M. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: a review of reviews. Br. J. Sports Med. 2011, 45, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, R. D.; Fast, D. K.; Burd, L.; Kerbeshian, J.; Robertson, M. M.; Sandor, P. An international perspective on Tourette syndrome: selected findings from 3500 individuals in 22 countries. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2000, 42, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bluth, K.; Blanton, P.W. Mindfulness and Self-Compassion: Exploring Pathways to Adolescent Emotional Well-Being. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2013, 23, 1298–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duchowny, K.A.; Clarke, P.J.; Peterson, M.D. Muscle Weakness and Physical Disability in Older Americans: Longitudinal Findings from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study. J. Nutr. Heal. Aging 2017, 22, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Giorgio, A. The roles of motor activity and environmental enrichment in intellectual disability. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 2017, 34, 34–43. [Google Scholar]
- White, J. P. Exploring well-being in schools: A guide to making children’s lives more fulfilling. Taylor & Francis, 2011.
| N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender Male 1/ Female 2 |
12 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.5833 | .51493 |
| Age | 12 | 16 | 18 | 17.42 | .793 |
| Hight | 12 | 145 | 180 | 162.25 | 11.355 |
| Valid N (listwise) | 12 |
| Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valid | B | 5 | 41.7 | 41.7 | 41.7 |
| F | 7 | 58.3 | 58.3 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 12 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
| Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valid | 16 | 2 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 16.7 |
| 17 | 3 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 41.7 | |
| 18 | 7 | 58.3 | 58.3 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 12 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
| Psychomotor variables |
High | Moderate | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body schema | 12 (100%) | - | - | |
| Basic positions and movements | 8 (66,66%) | 4 (33,33%) | - | |
| Fundamental motor behaviors | 7 (58,33%) | 2(16,66%) | 3 (25%) | |
| Fine motor skills | 8 (66,66%) | 3 (25%) | 1 (8,33%) | |
| Spatial orientation | 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) | - | |
| Temporal orientation | 12 (100%) | - | - | |
| Cognitive Dimensions | Simple | Complex | No | |
| Comprehension of Concepts | 10 (83,33%) | 2 (16,66%) | - | |
| Definition of Concepts | 11 (91,66%) | 1 (8,33%) | ||
| Application of Concepts | 10 (83,33%) | 1 (8,33%) | 1(8,33%) | |
| Language and communication | Low | Moderate | High | |
| Lexical Proficiency | 2 (16,66%) | 9 (75%) | 1 (8,33%) | |
| Verbal expression | 9 (75%) | 1 (8,33%) | 2 (16,66%) | |
| Attentional Focus | Low | Moderate | High | |
| 5 (41,66%) | 7 (58,33%) | |||
| Social Indicators | Consistently communicative and emotionally stable | Displaying tendencies of withdrawal and isolation | Exhibiting turbulence and a propensity for violent behavior | |
| 1 (8,33%) | 8 (66,66%) | 3 (25%) | ||
| Academic Knowledge Level | Not developed at all | Low | Moderate | High |
| Reading Proficiency | 2 (16,66%) | 8 (66,66%) | 2 (16,66%) | |
| Writing Proficiency | 1 (8,33%) | 9 (75%) | 2 (16,66%) | 1 (8,33%) |
| Numerical Competence | 2 (16,66%) | 10 (83,33%) |
| No. | Segment one - Fundamental psychomotor foundations | |
|---|---|---|
| Establishing Fundamental Psychomotor Foundations | Mechanisms | |
| 1 | Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 1-4) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
-Training approaches for enhancing balance maintenance abilities. Training techniques for spatial orientation education. Methods for dynamic balance education: an applied utility course implemented through specialized inclusive means for children with ID. Mechanisms for the development of ideomotor skills and spatial orientation/reorientation. |
| 2 | Coordination Development and Climbing Skills | Mechanisms |
|
Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 5-8) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
Mechanisms for facilitating climbing skills and coordination development. Mechanisms for developing coordination of body segments. Mechanisms for fostering crawling and climbing over various obstacles of different sizes and heights. |
|
| 3 | Specific Coordination and Ideomotor Skill Refinement | Mechanisms |
| Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 9-12) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
Mechanisms for coordinating lower limb movements in various group interactions. Mechanisms for specific coordination and ideomotor skill development. Mechanisms for enhancing dynamic strength of the upper limbs and coordination. |
|
| 4 | Balance Education and Sport-Specific Coordination | Mechanisms |
| Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 13-16) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
Mechanisms for balance education. Mechanisms for developing specific coordination in various sports disciplines and branches. Mechanisms for educating utilitarian applicative behavior. |
|
| Segment two- Transition phase | ||
| 5 | Transition to Adapted Football Training | Training Objectives (Adapted Football) |
| Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 17-20) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
Enhanced movement proficiency in confined spaces. Refined ball handling skills in active play against opponents. Cultivated supportive teammate dynamics, tailored to adapted football’s intensity for children with intellectual disabilities. Advanced technical proficiency in navigating congested areas at the field center. |
|
| Segment three - Specialized football training and unified 7-a-side football match preparation | ||
| 6. | Offensive and Defensive Strategies | Training Objectives (Adapted Football) |
| Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 21-24) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
Improved technique for centrally positioned crosses during sideline penetrations. Fostered collaborative support dynamics among teammates, irrespective of zones and player positions. Enhanced precision passing within the 9-meter box and ball retrieval from the touchline during quick attack and counter-attack phases. Improved first-time passing ability in challenging conditions of adversity, marking, and de-marking. |
|
| 7 | Strategic Positioning and Group Pressing | Training Objectives (Adapted Football) |
| Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 25-28) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
Cultivation of the doubling sense in specific zones with teammate support. Improved ability for strategic position changes in congested areas of the field. Advancement in gameplay tactics through group pressing reactions across various zones. |
|
| 8 | Technical Mastery and Endurance Conditioning | Training Objectives (Adapted Football) |
| Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 29-32) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
Heightened quality of passes and combinations in the preparation zone for finishing. Enhanced capacity for ball control in running situations with self-control in the pre-finishing zone. Cultivation of the sense of infiltration with the ball at foot during running into the opponent’s defensive zone. Improvement in specific endurance for game conditions. |
|
| 9 | Match Preparation and Unified 7-a-side Football Match | Training Objectives (Adapted Football) |
| Implementation Period: 4 weeks x 2 (Weeks 33-36) Practice Duration: 50 minutes |
Enhanced striking ability of the ball in running situations, cross-country running from the sidelines of the field. Development of the support sense with own teammates with intensity specific to official game dynamics. Improved ability to receive the ball in running and pass it in the opposite direction of reception. Unified 7-a-side football match*. |
|
| Examples of activities from the first segment - Practical Applied Course Implemented Through Specialized Inclusive Means for Children with ID | ||
|---|---|---|
![]()
| ||
| Visual depiction of the initial stage in the circuit | ||
|
Number of stations and technical description |
Dosage, and execution variations. | |
| 1.Moving within a space delimited by various walking forms, following the teacher’s instructions using both palms and feet. Upon the whistle signal, participants can transition into different modes of movement, such as crawling on palms and knees, palms and soles face down, palms and knees face up, etc | 4-6 commands will be executed with transitions into the various specified variants given by the instructor; Students who do not respond will be assigned additional tasks. Game Variation / Possession Game from a seated position on palms and soles, face up. Various balls can be used, such as mini-handball, mini-football, mini-basketball, sponge balls, etc. Ball passing variation: the ball will be controlled and passed only with the feet, without allowing it to be lifted from the palms and soles with the face up or placed on the ground. |
|
![]() | ||
| Visual depiction of the second stage in the circuit | ||
|
Number of stations and technical description |
Dosage, and execution variations. | |
| 2.Walking in balance on the gymnastic bench, within a space delimited by randomly arranged gymnastic benches, various short games will unfold, such as touching, running, and climbing on the bench, etc. On the surface with gymnastic benches arranged randomly, following the teacher’s command, numerous passages will be made under the benches, crawling climb over the bench, or various crossings. Students who are allowed can also eliminate others from the game by touching them with the ball in the area between the benches. Balancing movements on gymnastic benches positioned normally or inverted, on the bench surface. Following the teacher’s command, transversal movements on the bench will be executed on one leg, backward, blindfolded, with auditory assistance from a peer, in pirouettes on one leg, and on both legs. |
Students will aim to avoid a classmate nominated by the teacher for tagging/touching with a ball. Students who do not respond to the change in the mode of movement over the bench will receive additional tasks. Students will strive to accurately execute the commands. From a balanced position on the gymnastic bench, students will be arranged in the bench area, executing various dance steps, turns, exercises for harmonious physical development, aiming to maintain balance. Momentary competitions will be held, focusing on who makes the fewest mistakes and who executes the movements most accurately in the mirror. |
|
![]() | ||
| Visual depiction of the second stage in the circuit | ||
| Number of stations and technical description | Dosage, and execution variations. | |
| 3.Competition of crawling while lying face down on the gymnastic bench - “seal crawl,” in parallel with the ground. Following the teacher’s command, students will turn onto their back and crawl on the bench by pulling themselves with their arms. | The arms will provide traction for the body, facilitating its movement through crawling; 3-4 repetitions. Crawling and pulling movement from a seated position on the gymnastic bench. The movement involves transitioning from a seated position on the bench to crawling with slightly raised legs to the side. |
|
| Examples of activities from the third segment – Adapted football training | ||
![]() | ||
| 3D Graphic Representation | ||
| Technical Description and Methodical Execution | Guidelines - Specific Dosage | |
| Four players positioned in a square with sides ranging between 15 and 25 meters, engaging in diagonal passing in pairs, systematically followed by an accelerated run along the square’s side. Immediately after, the ball is passed diagonally, and after two such executions, the passing and running directions are alternated. Passing is executed along the square’s side, followed by sprinting diagonally within the boundaries marked by cones | The execution will be repeated for 10-12 passes, followed by accelerated sprints, with a semi-active break of 2-3 minutes. During this break, a brief seated stretching program will be practiced on the grass or a mat. As a variant, an additional task can be introduced during the sprint distance, involving a change in direction by maneuvering through three tall cones arranged in a zigzag pattern. |
|
| 3D Graphic Representation | ||
| Technical Description and Methodical Execution | Guidelines - Specific Dosage | |
| Field Dimensions: The game takes place on a field measuring 60 by 30 meters, featuring an integrated neutral zone at the center. Players from both teams are prohibited from entering this neutral zone. The field is equipped with two official goals, each guarded by active goalkeepers. Game Dynamics: The match unfolds as a partially indirect confrontation with the opponent, emphasizing teamwork, strategy, and inclusive play. The neutral zone adds an extra layer of complexity to the game, featuring a neutral player who can only enter the game with the team in possession. This neutral player has the unique ability to penetrate the playing areas of both teams, providing an element of surprise and adaptability to the game. Scoring Rules: Players positioned in the halves of the field 2 by 2 will only score in the goal of the half they belong to. This scoring rule encourages players to work cohesively with their teammates and strategize effectively to secure goals in their designated halves. |
The execution will be repeated 4-6 times with a semi-active break, during which continuous ball control from ankle play will be practiced, followed by light running and stretching while seated on the grass or mat. Instructions: Players must adhere to the rule of scoring only in the goal of the half they belong to, fostering a strategic approach to the game. The neutral player can significantly impact the flow of the game by strategically entering the playing areas, requiring teams to adapt their strategies dynamically. Emphasize the principles of teamwork, communication, and inclusion throughout the game. Work Variation: The number of players for each team can be adjusted individually to accommodate different skill levels and promote inclusivity. Introduce numerical disadvantages or advantages for either team, providing an additional challenge or support as needed. This adapted 4 vs. 4 inclusive football game is designed to promote teamwork, strategic thinking, and inclusive play, catering specifically to the unique dynamics of Unified Football with Partners and Children with Intellectual Disabilities. |
|
| ESI_Static_balance | ESF_Static_balance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ESI_Static_balance | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .999** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| ESF_Static_balance | Pearson Correlation | .999** | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). | |||
| E.I.DynamicBalance | E.FDynamicBalanc | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| E.I.DynamicBalance | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .998** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| E.FDynamicBalance | Pearson Correlation | .998** | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). | |||
| SII_Identified_stimuli | SIF_Identified_stimuli | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SII_Identified_stimuli | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .990** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| SIF_Identified_stimuli | Pearson Correlation | .990** | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). | |||
| PPSI_Pulse_processing_speed | PPSF_Pulse_processing_speed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PPSI_Pulse_processing_speed | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .836** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .001 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| PPSF_Pulse_processing_speed | Pearson Correlation | .836** | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .001 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). | |||
| SocII_Social_interaction | SocIF_Social_interaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SocII_Social_interaction | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .000 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 1.000 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| SocIF_Social_interaction | Pearson Correlation | .000 | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 1.000 | ||
| N | 12 | 12 | |
| Paired Differences | t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | ||||||
| Lower | Upper | ||||||||
| Pair 1 | ESI_Static_balance - ESF_Static_balance | -1.750 | .754 | .218 | -2.229 | -1.271 | -8.042 | 11 | .000 |
| Pair 2 | SocII_Social_interaction - SocIF_Social_interaction | -2.167 | .835 | .241 | -2.697 | -1.636 | -8.990 | 11 | .000 |
| Paired Differences | t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | ||||||
| Lower | Upper | ||||||||
| Pair 1 | PPSI_Pulse_processing_speed - PPSF_Pulse_processing_speed | -.10525 | .15861 | .04579 | -.20603 | -.00447 | -2.299 | 11 | .042 |
| Pair 2 | SocII_Social_interaction - SocIF_Social_interaction | -2.167 | .835 | .241 | -2.697 | -1.636 | -8.990 | 11 | .000 |
| Paired Differences | t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | ||||||
| Lower | Upper | ||||||||
| Pair 1 | SII_Identified_stimuli - SIF_Identified_stimuli | -1.167 | .577 | .167 | -1.533 | -.800 | -7.000 | 11 | .000 |
| Pair 2 | SocII_Social_interaction - SocIF_Social_interaction | -2.167 | .835 | .241 | -2.697 | -1.636 | -8.990 | 11 | .000 |
| Paired Differences | t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | ||||||
| Lower | Upper | ||||||||
| Pair 1 | E.I.DynamicBalance E.FDynamicBalance | -.007083 | .012139 | .003504 | -.014796 | .000629 | -2.021 | 11 | .068 |
| Pair 2 | SocII_Social_interaction -SocIF_Social_interaction | -2.167 | .835 | .241 | -2.697 | -1.636 | -8.990 | 11 | .000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).




