Submitted:
06 March 2024
Posted:
07 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Investigation
2.1. Materials
2.2. Casting of Test Specimens
2.3. Test Setup


2.4. Experimental Approach
2.4.1. Static Tensile Tests
2.4.2. Cyclic Tests
2.4.2.1. Low Cycle Tests
2.4.2.1. High Cycle Tests

- Load level: The maximum load level is varied from 50 to 90 percent of the characteristic tensile load as determined by the static tests described above and the minimum load level Rmin = 0.05 is maintained.
- Number of cycles: Initially four specimens are subjected to cyclic tests with up to 100 cycles, a further set of four specimens are tested with up to 10000 cycles. A third set of four samples is then tested with varying load cycles from 1000000 to 2000000 cycles.
- Test frequency: Each sample is tested at a frequency of 4 Hz
2.4.3. Residual Strength Test
3. Experimental Results and Discussions
3.1. Mechanical Properties
3.2. Static Tensile Tests
3.3. Evaluation of Fracture Properties
3.4. Cyclic Tests
3.4.1. Low Cycle Tests
3.4.2. High Cycle Tests
3.5. Post-Fatigue Analysis of Residual Fracture Toughness


3.6. Computed Tomography
4. Conclusions
5. Future Work
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- De Joly. Strength and elasticity of Portland Cement (La resístanse et l’étasticité desciments Portland) (in French). Annales dês Ponts et Chaussee, Memoires. 1898;16(7): 216–226.
- Considere, M. Influence of rebar on the properties of mortars and concretes (Influence dês armatures métalliques sur lés propriétés dês mortiers et bétons) (in French). Compte Redu de L’Academic des Sciences. 1899;127:992–995.
- Hsu, T.C.C. Fatigue of plain concrete. ACI Journal. 1981;78:292–305.
- Karr, U; Schuller, R; F, Michael; D, Andreas; S, Alfred & M, Herwig. (2017). Very high cycle fatigue testing of concrete using ultrasonic cycling. Materials Testing. 59. 438-444. [CrossRef]
- Loeffler, C. , Sun, Q., Heard, W., Martin, B., Williams, B., & Nie, X. (2020). The effect of loading duration on damage initiation in high-strength concrete. Mechanics of Materials, 140, 103216. [CrossRef]
- 6. Ukpata, J. O., Ewa, D. E., Success, N. G., Alaneme, G. U., Otu, O. N., & Olaiya, B. C. (2024). Effects of aggregate sizes on the performance of laterized concrete. Scientific Reports, 14(1). [CrossRef]
- 7. Guo, J., Lin, W., Qin, X., Xu, Y., & Dong, K. (2022). Mesoscopic study on fracture behavior of fully graded concrete under uniaxial tension by using the phase-field method. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 272, 108678. [CrossRef]
- Yehia, S., Abdelfatah, A., & Mansour, D. (2020). Effect of aggregate type and specimen configuration on concrete compressive strength. Crystals, 10(7), 625. [CrossRef]
- Güçlüer, K. (2020). Investigation of the effects of aggregate textural properties on compressive strength (CS) and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) of concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 27, 100949. [CrossRef]
- Mechtcherine, V., & Müller, H. S. (2021). Fracture behaviour of high-performance concrete. Finite Elements in Civil Engineering Applications, 35–43. [CrossRef]
- Scheiden, T., & Oneschkow, N. (2019). Influence of two coarse aggregates on the damage mechanism in high-strength concrete under pure compressive fatigue loading.
- Giaccio, G., Rocco, C., & Zerbino, R. (1993). The Fracture Energy (G F) of high-strength concretes. Materials and Structures, 26(7), 381–386. [CrossRef]
- Wu, K.-R., Chen, B., Yao, W., & Zhang, D. (2001). Effect of coarse aggregate type on mechanical properties of high-performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(10), 1421–1425. [CrossRef]
- Malhotra, V. M. (1971). Concrete Rings for Determining Tensile Strength of Concrete and Effect of Specimen Size on Tensile Strength of Concrete.
- Cracking of concrete members in direct tension” (1986) ACI Journal Proceedings, 83(1).
- Wittmann, F. H., Roelfstra, P. E., Mihashi, H., Huang, Y.-Y., Zhang, X.-H., & Nomura, N. (1987). Influence of age of loading, water-cement ratio and rate of loading on fracture energy of concrete. Materials and Structures, 20(2), 103–110. [CrossRef]
- Einsfeld, R. A., and Velasco, M. S. L. (2006). Fracture parameters for high-performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 36(3), 576–583.
- Shah, S.P. and Carpinteri, A. (1991) Fracture Mechanics Test Methods for Concrete: Report of technical committee 89-fmt, Fracture Mechanics of concrete: Test methods. London: Taylor and Francis.
- Leusmann, T.; Basutkar, G.; Lunardelli, M.: Characterizing the 3D mesostructure of high performance concrete with the help of computed tomography. Gabrijel, I.; Grosse, C.; Skazlic, M. (Eds.): International Conference on Sustainable Materials, Systems and Structures (SMSS 2019) - Novel Methods for Characterization of Materials and Structures, Rovinj, Croatia, 20-22 March 2019, p.176-184. 22 March.
- ASTM D7313-13, (2013). Standard Test Method for Determining Fracture Energy of Asphalt-Aggregate Mixtures Using the Disk-Shaped Compact Tension Geometry, ASTM International.
- EN 12390-3, (2019) Testing hardened concrete - Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens.
- EN 12390-13, (2013) Testing hardened concrete - Part 13: Determination of secant modulus of elasticity in compression.
- EN 12390-6, (2009) Testing hardened concrete - Part 6: Tensile splitting strength of test specimens.
- Tada, H., Paris, P.C. and Irwin, G.R. (2000) The stress analysis of Cracks Handbook, third edition.
- Bažant, Z. P., & Oh, B. H. (1983). Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Matériaux Et Constructions, 16(3), 155-177. [CrossRef]
- Jenq, Y., & Shah, S. P. (1985). Two Parameter Fracture Model for Concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 111(10), 1227-1241. [CrossRef]
- Sakai, M., Ichikawa, H. Work-of-fracture of brittle materials with microcracking and crack bridging. Int J Fract 55, 65–79 (1992). [CrossRef]
- Cifuentes, H., Lozano, M., Holušová, T., Medi-na, F., Seitl, S., & Fernández-Canteli, A. (2017). Modified Disk-Shaped Compact Tension Test for Measuring Concrete Fracture Properties. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 11(2), 215-228. [CrossRef]
- fib (2013) “FIB model code for Concrete Structures 2010”.
- Li, D., Huang, P., Qin, G., Zheng, X., & Guo, X. (2017). Fatigue crack propagation behavior of RC beams strengthened with CFRP under high temperature and high humidity environment. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2017, 1-11. [CrossRef]
- Meng, X. & Song, Y. (2007). Residual tensile strength of plain concrete under tensile fatigue loading. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed., 22(3), 564-568. [CrossRef]
- González, D. C., Vicente, M. A., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Effect of cyclic loading on the residual tensile strength of steel fiber–reinforced high-strength concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(9).
- Kessler-Kramer, C., Mechtcherine, V., & Mueller, H. S. (2003). Failure of normal and high strength concrete under monotonic and cyclic tensile loading. Brittle Matrix Composites 7, 277-286. [CrossRef]
- Rybczynski, S., Schaan, G., Dosta, M., Ritter, M., & Schmidt-Döhl, F. (2021). Discrete element modeling and electron microscopy investigation of fatigue-induced microstructural changes in ultra-high-performance concrete. Materials, 14(21), 6337. [CrossRef]
- Carrara, P., Kruse, R., Bentz, D., Lunardelli, M., Leusmann, T., Varady, P. A., De Lorenzis, L.: Improved mesoscale segmentation of concrete from 3D X-ray images using contrast enhancers, In: Cement and Concrete Composites, Volume 93, October 2018, Pages 30-42. [CrossRef]
- Carrara, P., Ambati, M., Alessi, R., & De Lorenzis, L. (2018, November 06). A novel framework to model the fatigue behavior of brittle materials based on a variational phase-field approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.












| Component | Density (kg/dm3) | HPC-B (kg/m3) | HPC-G (kg/m3) | CM (kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement c | 3.09 | 500 | 500 | 659 |
| Water w | 1.00 | 176 | 176 | 232 |
| Superplasticizer sp | 1.05 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.93 |
| Stabilizer st | 1.10 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 3.76 |
| Quartz sand 0-0.5 mm | 2.70 | 75 | 75 | 116 |
| Sand 0-2 mm | 2.64 | 850 | 850 | 1320 |
| Basalt 2-5 mm | 3.06 | 350 | - | - |
| Basalt 5-8 mm | 3.06 | 570 | - | - |
| Gravel 2-5 mm | 2.64 | - | 302 | - |
| Gravel 5-8 mm | 2.64 | - | 492 | - |
| Sum | - | 2503 | 2385 | 2305 |
| w/c ratio | - | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Material | HPC-B | HPC-G | CM | Basalt boulder |
| Density [kg/dm³] | 2.52 | 2.41 | 2.26 | 3.06 |
| Compressive strength [N/mm²] | 116.8 +/- 3.2 | 92.6+/- 2.2 | 95.2+/- 1.1 | 312.8+-4.4 |
| Tensile strength [N/mm²] | 5.7+/- 0.8 | 4.3+/- 0.2 | 4.97+/- 0.7 | 19.201) +/- 3.7 |
| Young’s modulus [N/mm²] | 50336+/- 1762 | 35064+/- 1560 | 39514+/- 890 | 92681+/- 7647 |
| 1) split tensile strength according to EN 12390-6 | ||||
| Material Composition |
Ultimate Load PQ (N) |
Work of fracture Wf (N-mm) |
Stress intensity factor KQ (MPa-m1/2) |
Fracture Energy Gf (N/m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPC-B | 1470+/- 223 | 319+/- 33 | 1,00+/-0.17 | 165+/-17 |
| HPC- G | 1300+-133 | 252+/-53 | 0.75+/-0.07 | 143+/-18 |
| CM | 1230+-170 | 248+/-17 | 0.68+/-0.11 | 141+/-17 |
| Basalt | 2540 ± 131 | 819+/-225 | 1.40+/-0.07 | 425+/-117 |
| Material Composition | Maximum Load ratio[-] | Number of load cycles [-] |
Change in post-fatigue residual KQ [%] |
Average post-fatigue residual KQ [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPC-B | 0.80 | 1084292 | - |
+16.92 ± 9.88 |
| 0.75 | 1001407 | +33.49 | ||
| 0.75 | 1040321 | +9.03 | ||
| 0.70 | 2006284 | +9.75 | ||
| 0.50 | 1626702 | +15.42 | ||
| HPC-G | 0.70 | 1004180 | -3.61 |
-13.65 ± 6.68 |
| 0.70 | 1000180 | -15.79 | ||
| 0.65 | 1035314 | -5.38 | ||
| 0.60 | 1001215 | -21.79 | ||
| 0.50 | 1030497 | -21.69 | ||
| CM | 0.65 | 90290 | - | |
| 0.60 | 997976 | - | -12.85 ± - | |
| 0.50 | 1020711 | -15.35 | ||
| 0.50 | 1025237 | -10.35 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).