Submitted:
01 March 2024
Posted:
04 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Provenances and Pod Collection
2.2. Pod Measurement
2.3. Seed Extraction and Seed Traits Measurement
2.3. Seed Germination
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Pod Traits
3.2. Seed Traits
3.2. Correlation Between Pod and Seed Traits
3.3. Correlation of Pod and Seed Traits with Geographic and Climatic Factors
3.4. Clustering of the Provenances for Pod and Seed Traits and Climatic Factors
4. Discussion
4.1. Provenance Variation in Seed and Pod Traits
4.2. Interrelationships between Seed and Pod Traits
4.3. Relationships of Seed and Pod Traits with Geocoordinates, and Pattern of Variation
4.4. Relationships of Seed and Pod Traits with Bioclimatic Factors
5. Significance and Implications
6. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data availability statement
Acknowledgments
References
- Rajora, O.P. Genetic biodiversity impacts of silvicultural practices and phenotypic selection in white spruce. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1999, 99, 954–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajora, O.P.; Mosseler, A. Challenges and opportunities for conservation of forest genetic resources. Euphytica. 2001, 118, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoban, S.; Bruford, M.; Jackson, J.D.U.; Lopes-Fernandes, M.; Heuertz, M.; Hohenlohe, P.A.; Paz-Vinas, I.; Sjögren-Gulve, P.; Segelbacher, G.; Vernesi, C.; Aitken, S. Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 248, 108654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajora, O.P.; Zinck, J.W.R. Genetic diversity, structure and effective population size of old-growth versus second-growth populations of keystone and long-lived conifer, eastern white pine (Pinus strobus): Conservation value and climate adaptation potential. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 650299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moles, A. T.; Westoby, M. Seedling survival and seed size: A synthesis of the literature. J. Ecol. 2004, 92, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larios, E.; Venable, D.L. Selection for seed size: The unexpected effects of water availability and density. Funct. Ecol. 2018, 32, 2216–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razzaque, S.; Heckman, R.W.; Juenger, T.E. Seed size variation impacts local adaptation and life-history strategies in a perennial grass. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2023, 290, 20222460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parrotta, J. A. Albizia Lebbek (L.) Benth. In Tropical tree seed manual; Vozzo, J.A., Ed.; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, S. P. Favourite agroforestry trees; Agrotech Publishing Academy: Udaipur, India, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, R. V. Fodder trees of India; Oxford and IBH Publishing Company: New Delhi, India, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Balkrishna, A.; Sakshi; Chauhan, M.; Dabas, A.; Arya, V. A comprehensive insight into the phytochemical, pharmacological potential, and traditional medicinal uses of Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2022, 2022, 5359669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmed, M. J.; Theydan, S. K. Adsorption of p-chlorophenol onto microporous activated carbon from Albizia lebbeck seed pods by one-step microwave assisted activation. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2013, 100, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orwa, C.; Mutua, A.; Kindt, R.; Jamnadass, R.; Simons, A. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0, World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya, 2009. https://www.worldagroforestry.org/output/agroforestree-database accessed on 15-02-2024.
- Rajamohan, S.; Chidambaresh, S.; Sundarrajan, H.; Balakrishnan, S.; Sirohi, R.; Cao, D.N.; Hoang, A.T. Investigation of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters of Albizia lebbeck seed pods using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 384, 129333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, N.; Chacin, E.; Garcia, C.; Alastre, N.; Leal, F.; Forster, C. F. (1996) Pods from Albizia Lebbek as a Novel Water Softening Biosorbent. Environ. Technol. 1996, 17, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alabi, A.H., Buhari-Alade, A.I., Sholaru, F.O.; Awoyemi, R.F. Biosorption of phenols and dyes on Albizia lebbeck (Rattle seed) pod: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 5, 154–165. [Google Scholar]
- Tomar, S.; Jawanjal, P. Critical review of Albizia lebbeck-A multi potent drug. J. Ayu. Her. Med. 2019, 5, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khera, N.; Singh, R. P. Germination of some multipurpose tree species in five provenances in response to variation in light, temperature, substrate and water stress. Trop. Ecol. 2005, 46, 203–217. [Google Scholar]
- Thakur, I. K.; Dhuppe, S.; Sharma, J. P. Phenotypic variation and seed characters evaluation in different provenances of Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth. Ind. J. For. 2014, 37, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
- Bagchi, S.; Emmanuel, C. J. S. K. Analysis of variability for pod length and seed count in Albizia lebbek, benth. Myforest 1984, 20. [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari S., K.; Dhuria, S. S. Variability studies of pod and seed characteristics of Albizia procera in Chhattisgarh. Int. J. Sci. Res. Biol. Sci. 2018, 5, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
- Meenakshi; Rana, N.; Ghabru, A. Influence of geographic variation on morphometric traits of seeds, pods and germination behavior of Albizia procera. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2019, 7, 1626–1631. [Google Scholar]
- Meenakshi,; Rana, N.; Bharti, Chauhan, A.; Sankhyan, N.; Ghabru, A. Exploring intraspecific provenance variation in seed morphological traits of Albizia procera in mid-Himalayan region of India. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2023, 35, 168–178. [Google Scholar]
- Dhanai, C.S.; Uniyal, A.K.; Todaria, N.P. Source variation in Albizia chinensis (Osbeck) Mer.: seed and seedling characteristics. Silvae Genet. 2003, 52, 259–266. [Google Scholar]
- Czabator, F. J. Germination value: an index combining speed and completeness of pine seed germination. For. Sci. 1962, 8, 386–96. [Google Scholar]
- Lê, S.; Josse, J.; Husson, F. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 25, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassambara, A.; Mundt, F. factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses Package; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2017.
- R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2007.
- Sachan, M.S.; Tomar, J. M. S.; Bhatt, B. P. Genetic parameters for seed traits in Albizia chinensis (Osbeck) MERR. J. interacad. 2006, 10, 293–297. [Google Scholar]
- Vakshasya, R. K.; Rajora, O. P.; Rawat, M. S. Seed and seedling traits of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb.: Seed source variation studies among ten sources in India. For. Ecol. Manag. 1992, 48, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gera, M.; Gera, N.; Ginwal, H.S. Seed trait variation in Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Seed Sci. Technol. 2000, 28, 467–475. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, N.; Pokhriyal, T. C. Variations in pod and seed traits in six different Dalbergia sissoo seed sources. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2001, 4, 162–176. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, B.; Bhatt, B.P. Provenance variation in pod, seed and seedling traits of Dalbergia sissoo (Roxb. ex dc), Central Himalaya, India. Trop. Agric. Res. Ext. 2008, 11, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, O.; Sofi, A.H. Variability in seed traits and genetic divergence in a clonal seed orchard of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. J. For. Res. 2012, 23, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, S.; Tripathi, S. Studies on Fifteen Seed Source Variation in seed Traits of Dalbergia Sissoo (Roxb). Int. J. Sci. Res. 2018, 7. [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik, N.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, K.; Beniwal, R.; Kaushik, N.; Roy, S. Genetic variability and association studies in pod and seed traits of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre in Haryana. India. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2007, 54, 1827–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Divakara, B. N.; Alur, A. S.; Tripati, S. Genetic variability and relationship of pod and seed traits in Pongamia Pinnata (L.) Pierre., a potential agroforestry tree. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2010, 4, 129–142. [Google Scholar]
- Sahoo, D. P.; Rout, G. R.; Das, S.; Aparajita, S.; Mahapatra, A. K. Genotypic variability and correlation studies in pod and seed characteristics of Pongamia pinata (L) Pierre in Orissa, India. Int. J. For. Res. 2011, 728985. [Google Scholar]
- Gawali, A.; Wagh, R.; Sonawane, C. Evaluation of genetic variability and correlation in pod and seed traits of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre. germplasm for genetic tree improvement. For. Res. 2015, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, L.; Yu, H.; Yang, K.; Chen, L.; Yin, W.; Ding, J. Latitudinal and longitudinal trends of seed traits indicate adaptive strategies of an invasive plant. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 657813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenollosa, E.; Jené, L.; Munné-Bosch, S. Geographic patterns of seed trait variation in an invasive species: how much can close populations differ? Oecologia. 2021, 196, 747–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koech, G.; Ofori, D.; Muigai, A.W.; Makobe, M.; Muruiki, J.; Mowo, G. J.; Jamnadas, R. Genetic variability and divergence of seed traits and seed germination of five provenances of Faidherbia albida (Delile) A. Chev. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 8, 482–491. [Google Scholar]
- Shu, X.; Yang, X.; Yang, Z. Variation in seed and seedling traits among fifteen Chinese provenances of Magnolia officinalis. Not. Bot. Hortic. Agrobot. 2012, 40, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thangjam, U.; Sahoo, U.K.; Thong, P. Characterization of morphometric, reproductive and seedling traits of Parkia timoriana in Northeast India. Silva Fenn. 2020, 54, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loha, A.; Tigabu, M.; Teketay, D.; Lundkvist, K.; Fries, A. Provenance variation in seed morphometric traits, germination, and seedling growth of Cordia africana Lam. New For. 2006, 32, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavithra, H. R., Gowda, B., Prasann, K. T., Shivanna, M. V. Pod and seed traits in candidate plus trees of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre from southern peninsular India in relation to provenance variation and genetic variability. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 16, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devagiri, G.M.; Dhiman, R.C.; Thapliyal, R.C.; Patil, C.S.P.; Kumar, N. Genetic analysis of traits related to seed germination and vigour among provenances of Shisham (Dalbergia sissoo Roxb.). Ann. For. 2004, 12, 161–174. [Google Scholar]
- Palanikumaran, B.; Parthiban, K. T.; Sekar, I.; Umarani, R.; Amirtham, D. Variability studies for seed and seedling traits in Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre at Tamil Nadu. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 2016, 7, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, S.; Dey, A. N.; Roy, S.; Saha, A. Studies on seed source variation in seed traits of Aquilaria malaccensis (Agar). Int. j. curr. microbiol. appl. sci. 2020, 9, 1355–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chhatre, V.E.; Rajora, O.P. Genetic divergence and signatures of natural selection in marginal populations of a keystone, long-lived conifer, eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) from Northern Ontario. PLoS ONE. 2014, 9, e97291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pandey, M.; Rajora, O.P. Genetic diversity and differentiation of core versus peripheral populations of eastern white cedar, Thuja occidentalis L. (Cupressaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Götz, J.; Rajora, O.P.; Gailing, O. Genetic structure of natural northern range-margin mainland, peninsular, and island populations of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.). Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 10, 907414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daymond, A. J.; Hadley, P. Differential effects of temperature on fruit development and bean quality of contrasting genotypes of cacao (Theobroma cacao). Ann Appl Biol. 2008, 153, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundby, A.M.; Waalen, W.; Uhlen, A.K.; Knutsen, S.H. ; Wold, A-B. Effect of temperature during flowering, pod set, and seed development on yield components and accumulation of protein, starch, and low molecular weight carbohydrates in two faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivars. Legum. sci. 2023, e212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajora, O.P.; Eckert, A.J.; Zinck, J.W.R. Single-locus versus multilocus patterns of local adaptation to climate in eastern white pine (Pinus strobus, Pinaceae). PLoS ONE. 2016, 11, e0158691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khurana, E.; Singh, J.S. Influence of seed size on seedling growth of Albizia procera under different soil water levels. Ann. Bot. 2000, 86, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajora, O.P. Population Genomics: Concepts, Approaches and Application, Springer Nature: Switzerland AG, 2019; 823pp.
- Luikart, G.; Kardos, M.; Hand, B.; Rajora, O.P.; Aitkin, S.; Hohenlohe, P.A. Population genomics: Advancing understanding of nature. In Population Genomics: Concepts, Approaches and Applications, Rajora O.P., Eds.; Springer Nature: Switzerland AG, 2019; pp. 3–79. [Google Scholar]





| Seed Source | Location Code | State | Location |
Latitude (˚ N) |
Longitude (˚ E) |
Altitude (m) |
Rainfall (cm) |
| Jammu | RS | Jammu & Kashmir | Mira Sahib block, R.S. Pura Range, Jammu Forest Division, Seed zone J.K. I | 32˚ 35' | 74˚ 50' | 288 | 114.8 |
| Hoshiarpur | HP | Punjab | Hoshiarpur Range, Hoshiarpur Forest Division, Seed zone P.B. I | 31˚ 32' | 75˚ 55' | 305 | 75 |
| Pinjore | PI | Haryana | Pinjore Range, Morni-Pinjore complex, Morni-Pinjore Forest Division, Seed zone H.R. I | 30˚ 48' | 76˚ 54' | 600 | 84 |
| New Forest | NF | Uttarakhand | New Forest, Forest Research Institute and Colleges, Seed zone U.P. I | 30˚ 19' | 78˚ 02' | 660 | 216 |
| Mohand | MO | Uttarakhand | Mohand Range, Mohand Block, Compartment I-A, Shivalik Forest Division, Seed zone U.P. I | 30˚ 11' | 77˚ 54' | 430 | 90 |
| Bijnor | SH | Uttar Pradesh | Chandi Range, Anjani Block, Compartment I, Bijnor Forest Division, Seed zone U.P. II | 29˚ 54' | 78˚ 12' | 268 | 103.4 |
| Lalkuan | LK | Uttar Pradesh | Lalkuan Range, Compartment I, Haldwani Forest Division, Seed zone U.P. IV | 29˚ 04' | 79˚ 30' | 210 | 145.7 |
| Ahar | AH | Uttar Pradesh | Bulandshahr Range, Ahar Block, Ganga Khadar, North Doab Forest Division, Seed zone U.P. VIII | 28˚ 27' | 78˚14' | 190 | 72.8 |
| Bankati | BA | Uttar Pradesh | Bankati Range, Kemagori Block, South Gonda Forest Division, Seed zone U.P. VI | 28˚ 26' | 80˚ 35' | 160 | 125.9 |
| Vrindavan | VR | Uttar Pradesh | Mathura Range, Vrindavan Block, Vrijbhumi Forest Division, Near Tehra village, Seed zone U.P. VIII | 27˚ 35' | 77˚ 36' | 160 | 50.8 |
| Jaipur | JP | Rajasthan | Jaipur Range, Grass Farm Weed Block, Forest Nursery Grass farm, Jaipur Forest Division, Seed zone RJ. II | 26˚ 45' | 75˚ 45' | 420 | 54.82 |
| Udaipur | UD | Rajasthan | Udaipur Range, Sitamata Nursery, Shelterbelt Forest Division, Seed zone RJ. III | 24˚ 35' | 73˚ 42' | 570 | 62.84 |
| Provenance | Pod length (cm) | Pod width (cm) | Pod width / Pod length | No of seeds/pod | No of seeds per pod / Pod length | |||||
| Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | |
| RS | 24.90 b ± 2.11 | 8 | 4.26 a ± 0.31 | 7 | 0.17 cdef ± 0.02 | 12 | 10.71 ab ± 0.86 | 8 | 0.43 bc ± 0.03 | 8 |
| HP | 23.18 c ± 2.17 | 9 | 4.27 a ± 0.33 | 8 | 0.19 c ± 0.02 | 13 | 10.14 bc ± 1.03 | 10 | 0.44 b ± 0.03 | 8 |
| PI | 26.22 a ± 2.89 | 11 | 4.13 ab ± 0.41 | 10 | 0.16 f ± 0.02 | 13 | 11.33 a ± 1.04 | 9 | 0.44 b ± 0.05 | 12 |
| NF | 19.00 e ± 1.30 | 7 | 3.45 de ± 0.25 | 7 | 0.18 cd ± 0.01 | 6 | 10.45 bc ± 1.05 | 10 | 0.55 a ± 0.05 | 8 |
| MO | 20.35 d ± 2.03 | 10 | 2.68 f ± 0.26 | 10 | 0.13 g ± 0.01 | 11 | 7.70 e ± 1.53 | 20 | 0.38 c ± 0.07 | 20 |
| SH | 18.80 e ± 1.46 | 8 | 3.84 c ± 0.35 | 9 | 0.21 b ± 0.02 | 11 | 8.91 d ± 1.13 | 13 | 0.47 b ± 0.06 | 12 |
| LK | 22.59 c ± 2.50 | 11 | 4.20 ab ± 0.30 | 7 | 0.19 bc ± 0.04 | 19 | 10.09 bc ± 1.76 | 17 | 0.45 b ± 0.11 | 23 |
| AH | 20.97 d ± 1.80 | 9 | 3.42 e ± 0.31 | 9 | 0.16 def ± 0.02 | 11 | 9.97 c ± 1.37 | 14 | 0.48 b ± 0.06 | 12 |
| BA | 22.77 c ± 2.02 | 9 | 4.06 b ± 0.20 | 5 | 0.18 cde ± 0.02 | 11 | 10.09 bc ± 0.91 | 9 | 0.45 b ± 0.06 | 13 |
| VR | 22.34 c ± 2.28 | 10 | 3.61 d ± 0.31 | 8 | 0.16 ef ± 0.02 | 10 | 10.10 bc ± 1.24 | 12 | 0.45 b ± 0.06 | 13 |
| JP | 22.62 c ± 4.09 | 18 | 3.36 e ± 0.41 | 12 | 0.16 ef ± 0.11 | 69 | 10.03 c ± 1.58 | 16 | 0.48 b ± 0.33 | 69 |
| UD | 15.74 f ± 2.45 | 16 | 4.14 ab ± 0.64 | 15 | 0.27 a ± 0.05 | 17 | 7.53 e ± 2.10 | 28 | 0.48 b ± 0.11 | 23 |
| Overall mean | 21.62 | 3.78 | 0.18 | 9.75 | 0.46 | |||||
| Seed or Pod Trait |
Trait Abbreviation |
Provenance | Replication | Error | Variance Estimates |
Provenance variation contributing to the total variation (%) |
|
| Provenance (σ2prov) | Error (σ2e) | ||||||
| (d.f.:11) | (d.f.:3) | (d.f.:1185) | |||||
| Seed length (cm) | SL | 0.399 *** | 0.011 ns | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 31.38 |
| Seed width (cm) | SW | 0.184 *** | 0.007 ns | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 24.47 |
| Seed width / Seed length | SW/SL | 0.19 *** | 0.002 ns | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.01 | 17.11 |
| Seed length × Seed width | SL× SW | 0.576 *** | 0.022 ns | 0.012 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 32.47 |
| Pod length (cm) | PL | 813.329 *** | 8.156 ns | 5.565 | 8.08 | 5.57 | 59.18 |
| Pod width (cm) | PW | 23.84 *** | 0.249 ns | 0.126 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 65.20 |
| Pod Width / Pod length | PW/PL | 0.109 *** | 0.002 ns | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 40.25 |
| No of seeds / pod | NSPP | 130.699 *** | 2.116 ns | 1.816 | 1.29 | 1.82 | 41.49 |
| No of seeds per pod / Pod length | NSPP/PL | 0.162 *** | 0.005 ns | 0.013 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 10.15 |
| (d.f.:11) | (d.f.:7) | (d.f.:77) | |||||
| 1000 Seed weight (g) | TSW | 4042.695 *** | 13.778 ns | 13.929 | 503.597 | 13.916 | 97.31 |
| (d.f.:11) | (d.f.:3) | (d.f.:33) | |||||
| Seed moisture% | SMP | 16.079 *** | 0.0521 ns | 0.245 | 3.963 | 0.229 | 94.55 |
| Insect infected seeds % | IIS | 338.393 *** | 0.439 ns | 4.552 | 83.546 | 4.209 | 95.20 |
| Seed germination % | SGP | 799.367 *** | 18.283 ns | 8.602 | 197.489 | 9.409 | 95.45 |
| Seed germination value | SGV | 330.889 *** | 10.508 * | 2.814 | 81.858 | 3.456 | 95.95 |
| Provenance | 1000 Seed weight (g) | Seed length (cm) | Seed width (cm) | Seed width / Seed length | Seed length×Seed width | Seed moisture% | Insect infected seeds % | Seed Germination % | Seed Germination Value | |||||||||
| Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | |
| RS | 112.02 d ± 3.26 | 2.91 | 0.88 de ± 0.11 | 12.72 | 0.70 e ± 0.07 | 10.20 | 0.81 de ± 0.10 | 12.51 | 0.62 def ± 0.12 | 19.18 | 18.74 f ± 0.53 | 3 | 14.43 d ± 1.46 | 10 | 45.86 b ± 2.91 | 6 | 7.48 c ± 1.29 | 17 |
| HP | 155.82 a ± 3.91 | 2.51 | 0.90 cd ± 0.07 | 7.76 | 0.69 ef ± 0.07 | 9.45 | 0.77 e ± 0.07 | 8.88 | 0.62 def ± 0.09 | 14.73 | 22.40 bc ± 0.47 | 2 | 7.79 e ± 2.74 | 35 | 75.17 a ± 3.17 | 4 | 31.97 a ± 4.20 | 13 |
| PI | 105.27 e ± 2.09 | 1.99 | 0.85 ef ± 0.07 | 8.75 | 0.69 ef ± 0.07 | 9.53 | 0.81 cde ± 0.11 | 13.26 | 0.59 efg ± 0.07 | 12.55 | 18.88 f ± 0.31 | 2 | 10.05 de ± 3.11 | 31 | 29.03 ef ± 4.16 | 14 | 1.14 ef ± 0.58 | 51 |
| NF | 106.14 de ± 2.29 | 2.16 | 0.82 fg ± 0.06 | 7.50 | 0.66 f ± 0.07 | 11.29 | 0.80 e ± 0.09 | 11.04 | 0.54 g ± 0.08 | 15.64 | 21.68 bcd ± 0.26 | 1 | 12.08 de ± 2.42 | 20 | 43.57 bc ± 1.19 | 3 | 5.64 cde ± 0.58 | 10 |
| MO | 107.50 de ± 3.62 | 3.37 | 0.84 efg ± 0.08 | 9.27 | 0.74 cd ± 0.06 | 8.59 | 0.88 a ± 0.08 | 9.15 | 0.63 de ± 0.09 | 14.99 | 21.43 cd ± 0.31 | 1 | 8.00 e ± 1.74 | 22 | 50.50 b ± 3.30 | 7 | 14.24 b ± 1.71 | 12 |
| SH | 103.08 e ± 2.13 | 2.07 | 0.93 bc ± 0.10 | 10.43 | 0.72 de ± 0.07 | 9.10 | 0.78 e ± 0.11 | 13.64 | 0.67 cd ± 0.09 | 13.99 | 20.51 de ± 0.42 | 2 | 19.58 c ± 1.12 | 6 | 36.71 cd ± 1.84 | 5 | 6.37 cd ± 0.73 | 12 |
| LK | 143.52 b ± 5.79 | 4.03 | 0.99 a ± 0.14 | 14.49 | 0.71 de ± 0.09 | 13.17 | 0.72 f ± 0.10 | 13.99 | 0.71 bc ± 0.16 | 23.35 | 22.75 b ± 0.25 | 1 | 10.37 de ± 0.78 | 8 | 34.51 de ± 4.73 | 14 | 1.96 def ± 0.82 | 42 |
| AH | 131.33 c ± 3.50 | 2.66 | 0.96 ab ± 0.07 | 7.55 | 0.78 ab ± 0.06 | 7.44 | 0.81 bcde ± 0.08 | 9.90 | 0.75 ab ± 0.08 | 11.22 | 25.47 a ± 0.35 | 1 | 23.52 bc ± 2.16 | 9 | 24.09 f ± 2.32 | 10 | 0.59 f ± 0.16 | 27 |
| BA | 127.60 c ± 2.91 | 2.28 | 0.93 bc ± 0.09 | 9.59 | 0.75 bc ± 0.07 | 9.54 | 0.81 cde± 0.08 | 10.22 | 0.70 bc ± 0.11 | 15.34 | 19.68 ef ± 0.27 | 1 | 21.53 bc ± 1.45 | 7 | 29.57 def ± 3.67 | 12 | 1.43 ef ± 0.81 | 57 |
| VR | 84.19 f ± 2.40 | 2.85 | 0.82 fg ± 0.08 | 10.11 | 0.70 e ± 0.07 | 10.19 | 0.86 abc ± 0.11 | 8.71 | 0.56 fg ± 0.13 | 18.23 | 18.95 f ± 0.25 | 1 | 39.21 a ± 2.97 | 8 | 50.48 b ± 2.15 | 4 | 9.59 c ± 2.18 | 23 |
| JP | 127.07 c ± 4.81 | 3.78 | 0.81 g ± 0.10 | 12.28 | 0.69 ef ± 0.10 | 14.36 | 0.85 ab ± 0.07 | 13.17 | 0.57 g ± 0.10 | 22.47 | 22.57 bc ± 1.05 | 5 | 21.10 bc ± 1.56 | 7 | 29.16 def ± 0.64 | 2 | 1.07 ef ± 0.28 | 26 |
| UD | 156.35 a ± 5.55 | 3.55 | 0.96 ab ± 0.10 | 10.30 | 0.81 a ± 0.08 | 10.10 | 0.85 abcd ± 0.11 | 12.55 | 0.77 a ± 0.13 | 16.25 | 22.05 bc ± 0.62 | 3 | 25.27 b ± 1.52 | 6 | 48.91 b ± 3.89 | 8 | 15.46 b ± 3.45 | 22 |
| Overall mean | 121.66 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 21.26 | 17.74 | 41.46 | 8.08 | |||||||||
| . | ||||||||||||||
| Seed traits | TSW (g) | SL (cm) | SW (cm) | SW / SL | SL × SW | SMP (%) | IIS (%) | SGP (%) | SGV (%) | PL (cm) | PW (cm) | PW / PL | NSPP | NSPP / PL |
| TSW (g) | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
| SL (cm) | 0.61* | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
| SW (cm) | 0.43 | 0.64* | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| SW / SL | -0.33 | -0.58* | 0.25 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| SL × SW | 0.60* | 0.92** | 0.89** | -0.21 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| SMP (%) | 0.59* | 0.39 | 0.33 | -0.14 | 0.41 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| IIS (%) | -0.26 | -0.04 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.14 | -0.11 | 1.00 | |||||||
| SGP (%) | 0.20 | -0.16 | -0.16 | 0.01 | -0.18 | -0.11 | -0.17 | 1.00 | ||||||
| SGV (%) | 0.37 | -0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | -0.01 | 0.05 | -0.21 | 0.96** | 1.00 | |||||
| PL (cm) | -0.21 | -0.26 | -0.50 | -0.19 | -0.42 | -0.39 | -0.25 | -0.12 | -0.18 | 1.00 | ||||
| PW (cm) | 0.41 | 0.48 | -0.01 | -0.63* | 0.28 | -0.28 | -0.06 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.28 | 1.00 | |||
| PW / PL | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.45 | -0.23 | 0.56 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.23 | -0.63* | 0.54 | 1.00 | ||
| NSPP | -0.23 | -0.24 | -0.65* | -0.40 | -0.47 | -0.26 | -0.11 | -0.24 | -0.34 | 0.79** | 0.38 | -0.40 | 1.00 | |
| NSPP / PL | 0.02 | -0.05 | -0.21 | -0.21 | -0.12 | 0.28 | 0.24 | -0.23 | -0.27 | -0.41 | 0.06 | 0.39 | 0.21 | 1.00 |
| Geographical factors | TSW (g) | SL (cm) | SW (cm) | SW / SL | SL ×SW | SMP (%) | IIS (%) | SGP (%) | SGV (%) | PL (cm) | PW (cm) | PW / PL | NSPP | NSPP / PL |
| Altitude | -0.001 | -0.394 | -0.185 | 0.279 | -0.324 | -0.041 | -0.376 | 0.070 | 0.071 | -0.254 | -0.138 | 0.189 | -0.109 | 0.305 |
| Rainfall | -0.109 | 0.036 | -0.382 | -0.464 | -0.171 | -0.044 | -0.447 | -0.105 | -0.241 | -0.092 | 0.046 | 0.004 | 0.254 | 0.462 |
| Latitude | -0.277 | -0.174 | -0.550 | -0.379 | -0.405 | -0.306 | -0.653* | 0.251 | 0.168 | 0.564 | 0.128 | -0.493 | 0.484 | -0.273 |
| Longitude | -0.252 | 0.199 | -0.085 | -0.330 | 0.066 | 0.041 | -0.038 | -0.414 | -0.441 | 0.128 | -0.196 | -0.386 | 0.193 | 0.009 |
| Annual mean temperature | 0.213 | 0.236 | -0.054 | -0.372 | 0.129 | 0.001 | 0.485 | -0.241 | -0.244 | 0.171 | 0.654* | 0.403 | 0.518 | 0.514 |
| Mean diurnal range | 0.234 | 0.109 | -0.108 | -0.274 | 0.025 | 0.042 | 0.467 | -0.098 | -0.078 | 0.123 | 0.600* | 0.427 | 0.455 | 0.518 |
| Isothermality | 0.441 | 0.336 | 0.265 | -0.153 | 0.351 | 0.166 | 0.369 | -0.276 | -0.165 | -0.316 | 0.430 | 0.691* | -0.047 | 0.499 |
| Temperature seasonality | -0.306 | -0.259 | -0.513 | -0.232 | -0.425 | -0.250 | 0.004 | 0.176 | 0.091 | 0.694* | 0.262 | -0.434 | 0.707* | -0.107 |
| Max temperature of warmest month | 0.178 | 0.185 | -0.130 | -0.390 | 0.058 | -0.021 | 0.441 | -0.169 | -0.183 | 0.238 | 0.662* | 0.345 | 0.573 | 0.482 |
| Min temperature of coldest month | 0.274 | 0.338 | 0.011 | -0.425 | 0.223 | 0.032 | 0.439 | -0.349 | -0.344 | 0.100 | 0.659* | 0.466 | 0.459 | 0.546 |
| Temperature annual range | 0.041 | -0.017 | -0.270 | -0.290 | -0.140 | -0.078 | 0.376 | 0.063 | 0.028 | 0.358 | 0.564 | 0.155 | 0.613* | 0.334 |
| Mean temperature of wettest quarter | 0.131 | 0.181 | -0.180 | -0.438 | 0.028 | -0.057 | 0.396 | -0.196 | -0.218 | 0.327 | 0.670* | 0.259 | 0.652* | 0.445 |
| Mean temperature of driest quarter | -0.215 | 0.195 | -0.253 | -0.520 | -0.008 | 0.035 | 0.357 | -0.315 | -0.378 | 0.150 | 0.354 | 0.100 | 0.559 | 0.515 |
| Mean temperature of warmest quarter | 0.148 | 0.158 | -0.140 | -0.366 | 0.036 | -0.032 | 0.459 | -0.177 | -0.194 | 0.260 | 0.643* | 0.313 | 0.589* | 0.471 |
| Mean temperature of coldest quarter | 0.292 | 0.297 | 0.052 | -0.335 | 0.222 | 0.055 | 0.508 | -0.283 | -0.267 | 0.024 | 0.631* | 0.525 | 0.388 | 0.568 |
| Annual precipitation | -0.145 | 0.124 | -0.361 | -0.553 | -0.119 | -0.084 | -0.539 | -0.110 | -0.189 | -0.042 | 0.056 | -0.053 | 0.212 | 0.293 |
| Precipitation of wettest month | -0.138 | 0.079 | -0.473 | -0.625* | -0.194 | -0.053 | -0.324 | -0.137 | -0.237 | -0.063 | 0.190 | 0.083 | 0.381 | 0.594* |
| Precipitation of driest month | -0.335 | -0.366 | -0.262 | 0.181 | -0.372 | -0.175 | -0.680* | 0.247 | 0.218 | 0.094 | -0.469 | -0.509 | -0.145 | -0.409 |
| Precipitation seasonality | 0.123 | 0.087 | -0.117 | -0.248 | 0.013 | 0.128 | 0.600* | -0.199 | -0.217 | -0.115 | 0.387 | 0.439 | 0.332 | 0.721** |
| Precipitation of wettest Quarter | -0.089 | 0.180 | -0.389 | -0.661* | -0.093 | -0.027 | -0.339 | -0.180 | -0.259 | -0.078 | 0.217 | 0.114 | 0.341 | 0.552 |
| Precipitation of driest Quarter | -0.324 | -0.273 | -0.340 | -0.018 | -0.356 | -0.189 | -0.748** | 0.196 | 0.141 | 0.143 | -0.354 | -0.487 | -0.026 | -0.328 |
| Precipitation of warmest Quarter | -0.226 | -0.039 | -0.599* | -0.577* | -0.338 | 0.042 | -0.622* | -0.009 | -0.107 | 0.047 | -0.080 | -0.215 | 0.247 | 0.241 |
| Precipitation of coldest quarter | -0.311 | -0.261 | -0.276 | 0.041 | -0.318 | -0.243 | -0.728** | 0.266 | 0.215 | 0.209 | -0.320 | -0.504 | -0.070 | -0.496 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).