Version 1
: Received: 24 February 2024 / Approved: 1 March 2024 / Online: 1 March 2024 (16:52:13 CET)
How to cite:
Li, X.; Lyu, Y. The Relationship between Rhythmic Temporal Attention and Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Attention. Preprints2024, 2024030060. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0060.v1
Li, X.; Lyu, Y. The Relationship between Rhythmic Temporal Attention and Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Attention. Preprints 2024, 2024030060. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0060.v1
Li, X.; Lyu, Y. The Relationship between Rhythmic Temporal Attention and Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Attention. Preprints2024, 2024030060. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0060.v1
APA Style
Li, X., & Lyu, Y. (2024). The Relationship between Rhythmic Temporal Attention and Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Attention. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0060.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Li, X. and Yong Lyu. 2024 "The Relationship between Rhythmic Temporal Attention and Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Attention" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0060.v1
Abstract
The adapted Posner spatial cue-target paradigm was used to explore the relationship between exogenous temporal attention caused by rhythm and endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. The study was divided into two experiments. In Experiment 1, 33 participants used arrow cues to orient endogenous spatial attention and rhythm to orient exogenous temporal attention. In Experiment 2, with 29 participants, exogenous spatial attention was directed by highlighting the cue box. Exogenous temporal attention was directed by rhythm. Experiment 1 indicated that RTs were faster for attended targets than the unattended. The main effect of temporal attention was significant, with RTs being faster for synchrony and late compared to early. RTs were faster for late compared to synchrony. The main effect of stimulus repetition was significant, with faster RTs for targets when the rhythmic cue consisted of five compared to four. The interaction between spatial attention and temporal attention was not significant. Experiment 2 demonstrated that exogenous spatial attention only exhibited IOR under early four stimulus repetitions. The main effect of temporal attention was significant, with RTs being faster for synchrony and late compared to early. The main effect of stimulus repetition was significant, with faster RTs for targets when the rhythmic cue consisted of five compared to four. The interaction between spatial attention and temporal attention was significant. The results indicated that rhythmic temporal attention supported foreperiod effects. Exogenous temporal attention and endogenous spatial attention independently affect behavior, while exogenous temporal attention and exogenous spatial attention mutually influenced behavior.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
