Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Communication

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Artificial Intelligent to Combat Loneliness and Social Isolation in Japan an Aid or Cure

Submitted:

27 February 2024

Posted:

29 February 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Loneliness is becoming prevalent across Japan in spite of its a dense population and communal culture. Surveys show 40% of adults report isolation across demographics. The contradiction emerges due to deteriorating social structure with modernization, economic parity, urbanization, and fading conventional setup. The continually social withdrawals, called “hikikomori." Relief seekers have embraced AI based emotive robots, digital avatars, and immersive VR as low-stakes social surrogates despite limited capacity to cultivate human intimacy. To stabilise government attempts awareness through reforms, scheme and support services. But a concrete transformation can be brough in with work-life balance, gender equality and rewire the metrics for self-esteem. Even a perfectly personalized AI cannot replace the human affection lacking in the society. Lasting solutions demand technological aids be balanced by confronting and reinventing community purpose and bring in structural change. Overall Japan’s endemic isolation reveals the societal fraying when modernization privileges independence over interdependence. The path forward rests on restoring cultural foundations to reverse loneliness and social isolation.
Keywords: 
Artificial Intelligent
;  
loneliness
;  
social isolation
Subject: 
Social Sciences  -   Psychiatry and Mental Health

I. Introduction

Loneliness is a wide spreading societal condition in Japan, striking significant portions of the population across demographics. According to a 2018 survey, 55.6% of Japanese respondents reported feeling lonely even before the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. This is despite Japan's cultural reputation as a collectivist society emphasizing group harmony and shared responsibility [2]. Japan consistently ranks as one of the loneliest countries globally across various indexes like the Legatum Prosperity Index [3]. For a nation built on togetherness the loneliness and isolation is a contradiction , with some of the world’s most densely populated urban centres like Tokyo and Osaka, suffers from prevalent feelings of isolation and lack of social bonding and personal connections [4]. While the pandemic undoubtedly aggravated issues of loneliness, the roots run much deeper into systemic issues in Japanese society and culture [5]. From economic instability and work pressures to decay of traditional family structures, various factors have converged to make loneliness a public health crisis in Japan [6]. While the data shows high loneliness, the reasons behind this epidemic in a supposedly tightly-knit country need exploring.

II. Reasons for High Loneliness

Several intertwined social, economic, and cultural factors underpin the high levels of loneliness in Japan. Excessive work demands and pressures make it difficult to achieve work-life balance for many Japanese employees [7]. Long working days, unpaid overtime, and expectation to put company loyalty over personal life leave little time to nurture social connections outside of colleagues [8]. Such work devotion derives from cultural norms about self-identity coming from workplace status. Economic instability and financial pressures also contribute to loneliness. For example, the 1990s collapse of the economic bubble left many unemployed, underemployed, or feeling status loss if they held onto jobs with reduced pay/authority [9]. Men especially tied self-worth to being breadwinners, so such failure brought shame and withdrawal [10]. Urbanization and mobility have eroded the traditional multigenerational household model [11]. Adult children move for work and aging parents live separately. Natural disasters like 1995's Great Hanshin earthquake exacerbated displacement [12]. With fewer family ties, elderly isolation and incidents of kodokushi (lonely deaths) have climbed.
"Hikikomori" refers to acute social isolation where people, 80% men, confine themselves from society for months or years [13]. While first noted in the 1990s, numbers rose after the Global Financial Crisis [14]. Their withdrawal from work/school and reliance on parents for basic needs represent one extreme of loneliness [15]. The origins reveal systemic issues, but quantifying the problem is key for motivating change.

III. Quantifying Loneliness

While loneliness is a complex phenomenon to measure, various surveys, indexes, and economic indicators shed light on its prevalence in Japan.
A 2018 survey by Kaspersky found 55.6% of Japanese respondents felt lonely even before the pandemic [1]. The country consistently ranks low on social connectedness in indexes like the Legatum Prosperity Index [3]. In Legatum's social capital index measuring strength of personal relationships, Japan ranked 143rd out of 167 countries [3]. The OECD Better Life Index also puts Japan below average in community engagement and work-life balance [16]. In a 2022 public health study, 40.3% of Japanese adults reported feeling lonely, up 3.9% from the previous year [17].
Indirect Indicators - In addition to direct survey data, indirect economic indicators reflect the extent of isolation and challenging social dynamics:
  • Single-Person Households: Estimated to rise from 18.4% in 2015 to 40% by 2040 [18].
  • Long Work Hours: Japanese employees work some of the longest hours among industrialized countries [19].
  • Technology Use: Widespread adoption of robotic pets, AI companions, and virtual reality as substitutes for human interaction [20].
This multidimensional data conveys the scope of loneliness across demographics in Japan. Tackling the issue requires recognizing its roots in systemic social and economic forces. Faced with rising loneliness, the government has attempted some responses, though their efficacy is doubtful.

IV. Government Efforts to Address the Issue

Recognizing loneliness as a growing public health crisis, the Japanese government has taken some initial steps to tackle the issue.
In 2021, former Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga appointed 71-year-old Tetsushi Sakamoto as the nation’s first “Minister of Loneliness” to address rising suicide rates and social isolation [21]. However, the role lasted less than a year before PM transition. Current PM Fumio Kishida established a new task force in late 2021 to focus on loneliness and isolation. Efforts include around-the-clock hotlines, partnerships with NGOs/private sector for community outreach, and permanent expansion of previous telephone consultation pilots [22]. While symbolic appointments and support services show government acknowledgment, critics argue systemic solutions are needed to fix cultural roots. Fragmented initiatives risk leaving the most isolated untouched and may provide only superficial relief [23].
Sustainable change requires understanding and reforming elements like youth pressure, economic insecurity, and outdated social norms that feed the loneliness loop. Cultural and historical analysis reveals the true roots of present-day isolation.

V. Root Causes of Loneliness

While recent events and policies have influenced loneliness levels, experts trace the origins to systemic societal issues rooted in culture and history.
Economic instability has markedly shaped Japanese social relations. The 1990s collapse of the bubble economy caused widespread unemployment and underemployment. An entire “lost generation” faced permanent income loss and lack of job stability [24]. Culturally, jobs confer status and self-identity. Losing work brought shame and social withdrawal for many men in particular who tied masculinity to being breadwinners [25]. Even today's youth face daunting job searches, as companies remain risk-averse about hiring full-time entry level positions after the bubble burst [26]. Intense competition carries heavy psychic tolls that inhibit social bonding. Disasters like the 1995 Kobe earthquake exacerbated housing issues and family displacement [27]. Urbanization has also eroded traditional multigenerational living, with youth mobility separating parents and grandparents geographically [28]. These trends catalysed elderly isolation.
The loneliness crisis thus emerges from generations of precarious economic structures and fading social support systems. Seeking remedy, many turn to advanced technology despite its narrow capabilities.

VI. Technology as a Solution or Problem

Japan has enthusiastically adopted technologies like robots, VR, and AI as remedies for loneliness. However, over-reliance on tech like AI based companions , virtual connections and Technology addiction instead of human connections poses societal risks.
From robotic pets like Aibo to humanoid Pepper, lifelike AI companions aim to fulfil emotional needs. VR creates immersive fantasy worlds for escapism. While helping some seniors, tech may enable withdrawal [29]. Studies suggest social robots elicit empathy, but over-dependence on artificial bonds risks eroding ability for real intimacy [30]. The VR space offers recreation but no actual human touch. As pandemic restrictions recede, device fixation spells further disconnection. Youth accustomed to smartphones and indie pastimes show greater affinity for technology over in-person socializing [31]. But failing to develop real relationships risks nurturing maladaptive behaviours. Heavy device use even rewires children's brains for isolation [32].
While tech promises temporary relief for lonely individuals, it cannot cultivate the nuance, affection, and understanding unique to human relationships. Over-reliance may thus enable avoidance of complex solutions. Researchers propose technology aids, but structural change is the real solution.

VII. Proposed AI and Technology Solutions

However, the solutions in Table 1 these aids are a relief factor these cannot fix or undo generations of societal dysfunction.

VIII. Limitations and Need for Broader Support

While AI and technology can patch some holes in the loneliness crisis, sustainable solutions call for cultural shifts in values and economic reforms.
Robots, chatbots, and VR may temporarily simulate companionship missing in people's lives. But surface-level tech cannot replicate human intimacy and understanding [41]. Once the novelty fades, an empty feeling remains. The loneliness epidemic emerged from dysfunctional social norms around work, gender roles, and collective duties [42]. Rectifying the problem requires fundamental changes in these cultural realms to promote balance, flexibility and inclusiveness. Without addressing flaws woven into societal structures, Band-Aid tech fixes risk enabling the intergenerational continuity of loneliness [43]. Each generation faces squeeze from outdated systems, finds stopgap relief in technology, and nothing structurally transforms. Breaking this loop necessitates wide lens.
True solutions come from compassion and willingness to reshape systems that bred the loneliness scourge to begin with. No bot can replace that human responsibility.
Some solution with AI that provided aid and support structure for Mental Health [44], Alzheimer’s [45], Health Care System with special reference to Mental Health [46] and Assistive Technology for Elders [47].

IX. Conclusion

Loneliness has developed into a public health crisis in Japan, worsened by economic and dysfunctional societal have isolated people across generations. While technology offers hope for temporary relief, it cannot truly replicate human intimacy and connection. The statistics and data presented in this paper quantify the prevalence of loneliness across demographics in Japan. Contributed by various factors, outdated social norms , decayed traditional support systems and collective purpose. The result is lonely and disconnected population seeking solace in AI and robots. However, over-reliance on technology enables avoidance of sustainable solutions. These temporary relief would perpetuate rather than confront loneliness. Stopping this vicious cycle requires fundamental changes and economic inclusiveness. There are no quick fixes to repair decades of policies that has fractured the society. But collective small steps towards awareness and community building can help. All of these cannot happen without government investments and support. These approach of inclusion and restricting combined with AI aid can overtime help reduce people suffering from loneliness.

References

  1. “Kasperskyレポート：コロナ禍の孤独感に関する意識調査＞2人に1人が孤独感を感じる日本人、約7割が「テクノロジーの利用は、孤独感を和らげるのに役立つ」と回答,” www.kaspersky.co.jp, 15-Dec-2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaspersky.co.jp/about/press-releases/2020_vir20082020. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  2. R. Kato, “NATIONAl CHARACTER STUDIES OF JAPANESE,” Soc. Thought Res., 1988. [CrossRef]
  3. “The Legatum Prosperity Index (2023) by the Legatum Institute :: Legatum Prosperity Index 2023,” Prosperity.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.prosperity.com/. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  4. D. McElhinney, “Opinion,” Tokyo Weekender, 25-Feb-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.tokyoweekender.com/japan-life/news-and-opinion/the-plight-of-loneliness-in-japan/. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  5. “Japan appoints ‘minister of loneliness’ to help people home alone,” Nikkei Asia, 12-Feb-2021. [Online]. Available: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Coronavirus/Japan-appoints-minister-of-loneliness-to-help-people-home-alone. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  6. C. Ozawa-de Silva, The anatomy of loneliness: Suicide, social connection, and the search for relational meaning in contemporary japan. University of California Press, 2021.
  7. P. Matanle, “Beyond lifetime employment? Re-fabricating Japan’s employment culture,” in Perspectives on work, employment and society in, Japan, 2006, pp. 58–78.
  8. Y. Kawanishi, “On Karo-jisatsu (suicide by overwork): Why do Japanese workers work themselves to death?,” Int. J. Ment. Health, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 61–74, 2008. [CrossRef]
  9. N. Yoshino and F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, Eds., Japan’s Lost Decade. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017.
  10. J. Moore, The other japan: Democratic promise versus capitalist efficiency, 1945 to the present. Philadelphia, PA: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.
  11. R. Ronald and A. Alexy, Eds., Home and family in japan: Continuity and transformation. Routledge, 2013.
  12. S. Toyama and H. Poudyal, “Prevalence of kodokushi (solitary deaths) in the Tokyo metropolitan area,” SN Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 7, 2021. [CrossRef]
  13. R. K. Fong Yong and Y. Kaneko, “Hikikomori, a phenomenon of social withdrawal and isolation in young adults marked by an anomic response to coping difficulties: A qualitative study exploring individual experiences from first- and second-person perspectives,” Open J. Prev. Med., vol. 06, no. 01, pp. 1–20, 2016. [CrossRef]
  14. H. Murayama, T. Suda, I. Nakamoto, T. Shinozaki, and T. Tabuchi, “Changes in social isolation and loneliness prevalence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: The JACSIS 2020–2021 study,” Front. Public Health, vol. 11, 2023. [CrossRef]
  15. C. Ozawa-de Silva, The anatomy of loneliness: Suicide, social connection, and the search for relational meaning in contemporary japan. University of California Press, 2021.
  16. “OECD better life index,” Oecdbetterlifeindex.org. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/countries/japan/. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  17. M. Prosser, “Searching for A cure for japan’s loneliness epidemic,” HuffPost UK, 15-Aug-2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/japan-loneliness-aging-robots-technology_n_5b72873ae4b0530743cd04aa. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  18. M. Colacelli and E. Fernandez-Corugedo, Macroeconomic Effects of Japan’s Demographics: Can Structural Reforms Reverse Them?”IMF Working Paper 18/248. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2018.
  19. The ILOSTAT database, International Labour Organization. [Online]. Available: https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/. [Accessed: Feb. 26, 2023].
  20. D. McElhinney, “Opinion,” Tokyo Weekender, 25-Feb-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.tokyoweekender.com/japan-life/news-and-opinion/the-plight-of-loneliness-in-japan/. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  21. “Japan appoints ‘minister of loneliness’ to help people home alone,” Nikkei Asia, 12-Feb-2021. [Online]. Available: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Coronavirus/Japan-appoints-minister-of-loneliness-to-help-people-home-alone. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  22. R. Nitanai and J. Goto, “Preventing social isolation: Otsuchi town after the Great East Japan Earthquake,” Environ. Hazards, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 379–399, 2022. [CrossRef]
  23. D. McElhinney, “Opinion,” Tokyo Weekender, 25-Feb-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.tokyoweekender.com/japan-life/news-and-opinion/the-plight-of-loneliness-in-japan/. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  24. N. Yoshino and F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, Eds., Japan’s Lost Decade. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017.
  25. J. Moore, The other japan: Democratic promise versus capitalist efficiency, 1945 to the present. Philadelphia, PA: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.
  26. イヌイ et al., “Precarious youth and its social/political discourse : Freeters, NEETs, and unemployed youth in Japan(comparative studies on NEET, freeter, and unemployed youth in Japan and the UK),” 人文学報. 教育学, no. 42, pp. 73–100, 2007.
  27. S. Toyama and H. Poudyal, “Prevalence of kodokushi (solitary deaths) in the Tokyo metropolitan area,” SN Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 7, 2021. [CrossRef]
  28. R. Ronald and A. Alexy, Eds., Home and family in japan: Continuity and transformation. Routledge, 2013.
  29. D. McElhinney, “Opinion,” Tokyo Weekender, 25-Feb-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.tokyoweekender.com/japan-life/news-and-opinion/the-plight-of-loneliness-in-japan/. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  30. J. Sung, H. I. Christensen, and R. E. Grinter, “Robots in the wild: Understanding long-term use,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, 2009.
  31. H. T. Wu, J. Li, and A. Tsurumi, “The change of screen time and screen addiction, and their association with psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of US country-wide school-age children and adolescents between 2018 and 2020,” bioRxiv, 2023.
  32. H. H. Wilmer, L. E. Sherman, and J. M. Chein, “Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, 2017. [CrossRef]
  33. J. Sung, H. I. Christensen, and R. E. Grinter, “Robots in the wild: Understanding long-term use,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, 2009.
  34. M. D. R. Haque and S. Rubya, “An overview of chatbot-based mobile mental health apps: Insights from app description and user reviews,” JMIR MHealth UHealth, vol. 11, p. e44838, 2023. [CrossRef]
  35. D. J. Finnegan and S. Campbell, “Tackling loneliness and isolation in older adults with Virtual Reality: How do we move forward?,” Gerontol. Geriatr. Med., vol. 9, 2023. [CrossRef]
  36. C. Berridge, Y. Zhou, J. M. Robillard, and J. Kaye, “Companion robots to mitigate loneliness among older adults: Perceptions of benefit and possible deception,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, 2023. [CrossRef]
  37. C. Berridge, Y. Zhou, J. M. Robillard, and J. Kaye, “Companion robots to mitigate loneliness among older adults: Perceptions of benefit and possible deception,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, 2023. [CrossRef]
  38. A. C. Horstmann, “Hey robot, can you help me feel less lonely?: An explorative study to examine the potential of using social robots to alleviate loneliness in young adults,” in Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2023.
  39. M. Zubatsky, M. Berg-Weger, and J. Morley, “Using telehealth groups to combat loneliness in older adults through COVID‐19,” J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1678–1679, 2020. [CrossRef]
  40. J. Pirhonen, E. Tiilikainen, S. Pekkarinen, M. Lemivaara, and H. Melkas, “Can robots tackle late-life loneliness? Scanning of future opportunities and challenges in assisted living facilities,” Futures, vol. 124, no. 102640, p. 102640, 2020. [CrossRef]
  41. D. McElhinney, “Opinion,” Tokyo Weekender, 25-Feb-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.tokyoweekender.com/japan-life/news-and-opinion/the-plight-of-loneliness-in-japan/. [Accessed: 21-Dec-2023].
  42. C. Ozawa-de Silva, The anatomy of loneliness: Suicide, social connection, and the search for relational meaning in contemporary japan. University of California Press, 2021.
  43. “Inside Japan’s growing ‘lonely death’ clean-up service,” CNN, 14-Jun-2021.
  44. Anoop K Ajay, Abhinand J Raj, Gopika Unni R., P S Aiswarya, Shilpa M Chandran, “Portrayal of Mental Health Issues in Manichitrathazhu and Taare Zameem Par,” Journal of Positive School Psychology, Vol 6, No 5, (2022) 8863-887.
  45. Nair, Namrata, et al. “Alzheimer’s Detection and Prediction on MRI Scans: A Comparative Study.” International Conference on Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023.
  46. K. Kumar, S. Chaudhary, H. Anandaram, R. Kumar, A. Gupta and K. Joshi, “Industry 4.0 and Health Care System with special reference to Mental Health,” 2023 1st International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Research Trends (ICRT), Roorkee, India, 2023, pp. 1-5.
  47. R. K. Megalingam, V. Radhakrishnan, D. C. Jacob, D. K. M. Unnikrishnan and A. K. Sudhakaran, “Assistive Technology for Elders: Wireless Intelligent Healthcare Gadget,” 2011 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 2011, pp. 296-300.
Table 1. AI based solution for overcoming social isolation.
Table 1. AI based solution for overcoming social isolation.
Reference Solution Theme Pros Cons
[33] Social robots for older adults: Framework of barriers to adoption Robot companions for elderly Provide comfort; Elicit empathy Expensive; Require learning new tech skills; Over-reliance risks
[34] A chatbot system as mental health intervention for loneliness Chatbots for mental health support Convenient 24/7 access; Anonymity reduces stigma No human warmth; Poor substitutes for therapy
[35] Virtual Reality to Address Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Review VR for elderly escapism Engaging cognitive stimulation; Safe adventures Isolation Enablement; Cost barriers
[36] AI Companion for Combating Loneliness and Social Isolation for the Elderly Custom AI avatars Personalized advice and affection Glitches erode trust; No physical assist benefits
[37] A Friendly Robot Companion to Combat Loneliness in Older Adults Robotic pet companions Safe affinity for vulnerable groups Overly simplistic interactions long-term
[38] The Potential of Digital Companions to Reduce Loneliness in Japan: A Survey Study Digital avatar companions Easy adoption for tech-savvy; Low-stakes Difficult to truly relate to non-humans; Glitches erode trust
[39] Using Online Support Groups to Combat Loneliness in the Elderly Online peer support groups Share coping strategies; Expert webinars Lack in-person intimacy; Can be overwhelming
[40] Banking on AI to Tackle Loneliness and Social Isolation in the Elderly AI for personalized activity planning Increases motivation for socializing Privacy concerns around data collection; No coaching component
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated