preprints.org > medicine and pharmacology > other > doi: 10.20944/preprints202402.1459.v1

Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Version 1 : Received: 26 February 2024 / Approved: 26 February 2024 / Online: 26 February 2024 (14:18:54 CET)

To assess the impact of a deep learning (DL) denoising reconstruction algorithm applied to identical patient scans acquired with two different voxel dimensions, representing distinct spatial resolutions. This IRB approved prospective study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric center in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. We used a General Electric Signa Premier unit (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) to acquire two DTI sequences of the left knee on each child at 3T: an in-plane 2.0 x 2.0 mm2 with section thickness of 3.0 mm and a 2 mm3 isovolumetric voxel, neither had an inter-section gap. We used a multi-band DTI acquisi-tion with fat-suppressed single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence (20 non-collinear directions; b-values of 0 and 600 sec/mm2). The MR vendor-provided a commercially available DL model applied with 75% noise reduction settings to same subject DTI sequences at different spatial res-olutions. We compared DTI tract metrics from both DL-reconstructed scans and non-denoised scans for femur and tibia, at each spatial resolution. Differences were evaluated using Wilcox-on-signed ranked test and Bland-Altman plots. When comparing DL versus non-denoised diffu-sion metrics in femur and tibia using the 2 mm x 2mm x 3 mm voxel dimension there were no significant differences between tract count (p = 0.1, p =0.14) tract volume (p = 0.14, p = 0.29), or tibial tract length (p=0.16); femur tract length exhibited a significant difference (p

diffusion tensor imaging; spatial resolution; denoising; pediatrics; growth; voxel size

Medicine and Pharmacology, Other

* All users must log in before leaving a comment