Submitted:
25 February 2024
Posted:
26 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Study area
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Sampling and analysis
3.1.1. Sampling and analysis of soil Hg
3.1.2. Determination of atmospheric total Hg
3.2. Methodology
3.2.1. Evaluation of soil Hg pollution
3.2.2. Soil Hg health risk assessment
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Factors affecting soil Hg levels
4.1.1. Distribution characteristics of soil Hg levels
4.1.2. Impact of wind direction on soil Hg
4.1.3. Relationship between soil Hg and atmospheric Hg
4.2. Hg pollution assessment
4.2.1. Soil Hg Pollution Assessment
4.2.2. Soil Hg Health Risk Assessment
5. Conclusion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Meriga, B.; Krishna Reddy, B.; Rajender Rao, K.; Ananda Reddy, L.; Kavi Kishor, P.B. Aluminum-induced production of oxygen radicals, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage in seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa). J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Futsaeter, G.; Wilson, S. The UNEP global mercury assessment: sources, emissions and transport. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment, Rome, Italy, 23 - 27 September 2012; pp. 973–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carocci, A.; Rovito, N.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Genchi, G. Mercury Toxicity and Neurodegenerative Effects. In: Whitacre, D. (eds.) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Rev. Environ. Contam. & Toxicol. 2014, 229, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, P.L. The sociological research on "Minamata Disease" in Japan (in Chinese with English abstract). J. Hohai Univ. (Philos. & Social Sci.) 2008, 10, 30–33. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, J. Mercury reduction efforts in Michigan. Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 60, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, L.; Pekka, N.; Sirkka-Liisa, N. Uptake of mercury by terrestrial plants-observations in Fin-land and Slovenia in the years 1979~1981. Mater. & Geoenviron. 2004, 51, 1181–1184. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, Y. Reviews of Mercury pollution distribution status research at home and abroad (in Chinese with English abstract). Environ. Prot. Sci. 2008, 34, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, H.; Liu, X.; Guo, J.; Xu, G.; Wu, G.; Zeng, X.; Wang, B.; Kang, S. Increased Mercury Pollution Revealed by Tree Rings from the China’s Tianshan Mountains. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 1328–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, W.; Lu, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, C.; Zhang, C.; Dong, F. Distribution characteristics and pollution assessment of mercury in urban soils of Guangzhou (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin. J. Soil Sci. 2009, 40, 1185–1188. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.; Bravo, A.G.; Lagerkvist, A.; Bertilsson, S.; Sjöblom, R.; Kumpiene, J. Sources and remediation techniques for mercury contaminated soil. Environ.Int. 2015, 74, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindberg, S.; Bullock, R.; Ebinghaus, R.; Engstrom, D.; Feng, X.; Fitzgerald, W.; Pirrone, N.; Prestbo, E.; Seigneur, C. A synthesis of progress and uncertainties in attributing the sources of mercury in deposition. Ambio. 2007, 36, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, F.; Wang, Q.; Li, J. Urban environmental mercury in Changchun, a metropolitan city in Northeastern China: source, cycle and fate. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 330, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodrigues, S.; Pereira, M.E.; Duarte, A.C.; Ajmone-Marsan, F.; Davidson, C.M.; Grčman, H.; Hossack, I.; Hursthouse, A.S.; Ljung, K.; Martini, C.; Otabbong, E.; Reinoso, R.; Ruiz-Cortés, E.; Urquhart, G.J.; Vrščaj, B. Mercury in urban soils: a comparison of local spatial variability in six european cities. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 368, 926–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Wang, M. Environmental mercury contamination in China: sources and impacts. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedli, H.R.; Radke, L.F.; Lu, J.Y.; Banic, C.M.; Leaitch, W.R.; MacPherson, J.I. Mercury emissions from burning of biomass from temperate north american forests: laboratory and airborne measurements. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNEP. Global mercury assessment 2013: sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport; UNEP Chemicals Branch: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, B.; Li, J.S.; Chen, G.Q.; Wei, W.D.; Yang, Q.; Yao, M.T.; Shao, J.A.; Zhou, M.; Xia, X.H.; Dong, K.Q.; Xia, H.P.; Chen, H.P. China’s energy-related mercury emissions: characteristics, impact of trade and mitigation policies. J. Cleaner Prod. 2017, 141, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Pudasainee, D.; Duan, Y.; Gupta, R.; Liu, M.; Lu, J. A review on mercury in coal combustion process: concentration and occurrence forms in coal, transformation, sampling methods, emission and control technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2019, 73, 26–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Z.P.; Chen, Y.C.; Yang, X.C.; Wei, S.Q. Assessment of potential ecological hazard of heavy metals in urban soils in Chongqing City (in Chinese with English abstract). J. Southwest Agricul. Univ. 2006, 2, 227–230. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, S.; Wu, X.; Yan, C. Heavy metal concentrations and their spatial distribution in urban soils of Nanjing (in Chinese with English abstract). Urban Environ. & Urban Ecol. 2007, 20, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.S.; Qin, Y.; Sang, S.X. Accumulation and sources of heavy metals in urban topsoils: a case study from the city of Xuzhou, China. Environ.Geol. 2005, 48, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Ye, J. Soil mercury distribution and pollution in urban and suburbs of Guilin (in Chinese with English abstract). Geochim. 2000, 1, 94–99. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Luo, K.; Sun, X.; Sun, X.; Tan, J.; Lu, Y. Mercury in the topsoil and dust of Beijing City. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 368, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, C.; Wang, Y.; Ren, Y.; Shi, J. The distribution characteristics of Hg-element concentration in the surface soil in Taiyuan (in Chinese with English abstract). J. Shanxi Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 1996, 19, 339–344. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X. Research on the environmental background values of soils in Xizang (in Chinese with English abstract). Sci. Geogr. Sin. 1994, 14, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H. The Investigation of The Heavy Metal Pollution in The Aningqu District (in Chinese with English abstract). Arid Environ. Monit. 2023, 17, 117–122. [Google Scholar]
- Manta, D.S.; Angelone, M.; Bellanca, A.; Neri, R.; Sprovieri, M. Heavy metals in urban soils:a case study from the city of Palermo (Sicily), Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 300, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kot, F.S.; Matyushkina, L.A. Distribution of mercury in chemical fractions of contaminated urban soils of Middle Amur, Russia. J. Environ. Monit. 2002, 4, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Y.; Ma, S.; Zhu, W.; Shi, Q.; Jiang, H.; Lu, R.; Wu, W. Revealing varying relationships between wastewater mercury emissions and economic growth in Chinese cities. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 341, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Wang, Y. Spatial-temporal changes of land-use mercury emissions in China. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 146, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Lu, X.; Wang, L.; Jia, X.; Wang, F. Evaluation of Hg soil around the Baoji coal-fired power plant (in Chinese with English abstract). China J. Soil Sci. 2007, 38, 622–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Lu, X.; Jing, Q.; Ren, C.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Luo, D. Heavy metals pollution in soil around the lead-zinc smelting plant in Changqing Town of Baoji City, China (in Chinese with English abstract). J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2012, 31, 325–330. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, P.; Qiu, H.Y.; Guo, Y.N.; Wang, L.Y. Heavy metal contamination and health risk assessment in the zinc mine set area of Youxi, China (in Chinese with English abstract). J. Xiamen Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2012, 51, 245–251. [Google Scholar]
- BQTS (Beijing Municipal Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision). Environmental site assessment guideline (DB11 T 656-2009, in Chinese), 2009, pp. 1-41.
- EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). 1989, pp. 1-291.
- Du, Y.; Gao, B.; Zhou, H.; Ju, X.; Hao, H.; Yin, S. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in road dusts in urban parks of Beijing, China. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2013, 18, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilavert, L.; Nadal, M.; Schuhmacher, M.; Domingo, J.L. Concentrations of metals in soils in the neighborhood of a hazardous waste incinerator: assessment of the temporal trends. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 149, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, R.; Ma, K.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, Q. Health risk assessment of heavy metals of street dust in Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Sci. Circumst. 2012, 32, 2006–2015. [Google Scholar]
- Danieal, S.M.; Massimo, A.; Adriana, B.; Rodolfo, N.; Mario, S.H. Metals in urban soil: a case study from the City of Palermo (Sicily), Italy. the Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 300, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Shi, X.; Yang, X. Transformation of atmospheric mercury in soil and its influence on the accumulation of mercury in soil (in Chinese with English abstract). Chongqing Environ. Sci. 1998, 20, 22–25. [Google Scholar]






| Sub-study area | mean | Range | Std |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | 32.67 | 10.70-104.67 | 21.61 |
| NW | 147.16 | 10.00-1582.50 | 329.43 |
| NE | 54.01 | 8.33-321.50 | 43.32 |
| S | 41.08 | 6.04-180.50 | 27.25 |
| SE | 26.96 | 9.43-84.00 | 16.52 |
| All | NW | NE | S | SE | B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | R2 | 0.613 | 0.495 | 0.488 | 0.827 | 0.173 | 0.797 |
| P | 6.6770·10-26 | 0.0010 | 5.1767 | 1.0334·10-20 | 0.4078 | 0.0004 | |
| A>G | R2 | 0.830 | 0.829 | 0.740 | 0.931 | 0.788 | 0.802 |
| P | 7.3478·10-27 | 3.9269·10-5 | 2.4565·10-5 | 1.0557·10-5 | 0.0023·10-5 | 0.1982·10-5 | |
| A<G | R2 | 0.789 | 0.786 | 0.752 | 0.928 | 0.516 | 0.932 |
| P | 1.3148·10-27 | 2.3977·10-5 | 5.0836·10-8 | 2.3671·10-18 | 0.0708 | 2.9877·10-5 |
| All | NW | NE | S | SE | B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | R2 | -0.063 | -0.134 | -0.049 | -0.102 | -0.069 | -0.237 |
| P | 0.3348 | 0.4092 | 0.6705 | 0.3755 | 0.7420 | 0.3941 | |
| A>G | R2 | -0.061 | -0.211 | -0.115 | 0.025 | -0.103 | -0.424 |
| P | 0.5455 | 0.4152 | 0.5031 | 0.8923 | 0.7489 | 0.5756 | |
| A<G | R2 | -0.006 | -0.165 | -0.028 | -0.152 | -0.158 | -0.041 |
| P | 0.9512 | 0.4737 | 0.8664 | 0.3413 | 0.6070 | 0.8997 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).