Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

3-D structure of Novel Liver Cancer Biomarker LC-SPIK and its Performance in Clinical Diagnosis of HCC

Version 1 : Received: 23 February 2024 / Approved: 23 February 2024 / Online: 26 February 2024 (12:01:59 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Lu, F.; Ott, C.; Bista, P.; Lu, X. Three-Dimensional Structure of Novel Liver Cancer Biomarker Liver Cancer-Specific Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal (LC-SPIK) and Its Performance in Clinical Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Diagnostics 2024, 14, 725. Lu, F.; Ott, C.; Bista, P.; Lu, X. Three-Dimensional Structure of Novel Liver Cancer Biomarker Liver Cancer-Specific Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal (LC-SPIK) and Its Performance in Clinical Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Diagnostics 2024, 14, 725.

Abstract

LC-SPIK is a liver cancer-specific isoform of Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal and has been proposed as a new biomarker for the detection of HCC given its unique 3-D structure which differs from normal pancreatic SPIK. An ELISA technology based on its unique structure was developed to use LC-SPIK as an effective biomarker for the clinical diagnosis of HCC. AFP, the most widely used biomarker for HCC surveillance currently, suffers from poor clinical performance, especially in the detection of early-stage HCC. In one case-control study, which included 164 HCC patients and 324 controls, LC-SPIK had an AUC of 0.87 compared to only 0.70 for AFP in distinguishing HCC from liver disease controls (cirrhosis, HBV/HCV). LC-SPIK also performed significantly better than AFP for the 81 patients with early-stage HCC (BCLC stage 0 and A), with an AUC of 0.85 compared to only 0.61 for AFP. Cirrhosis is the major risk factor for HCC, about 80% of patients with newly diagnosed HCC have preexisting cirrhosis. LC-SPIK’s clinical performance was also studied in HCC patients with viral and non-viral cirrhosis including cirrhosis caused by nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). In a total of 163 viral cirrhosis patients with 93 HCC patients (50 early-stage), LC-SPIK had an AUC of 0.85, while AFP had an AUC of 0.70. For patients with early-stage HCC, LC-SPIK had a similar AUC of 0.83, while AFP had an AUC of only 0.60. For 120 patients with nonviral cirrhosis, including 62 HCC (23 early-stage) patients, LC-SPIK had an AUC of 0.84 while AFP had an AUC of only 0.72. For the 23 patients with early-stage HCC, LC-SPIK had a similar AUC of 0.83, while the AUC for AFP decreased to 0.65. All these results suggest that LC-SPIK has significantly better performance in the detection of HCC than AFP in all etiologies of liver diseases. In addition, LC-SPIK accurately detected the presence of HCC in 71%-91% of HCC patients with false-negative AFP test results in viral associated HCC and non-viral associated HCC.

Keywords

Biomarker; HCC (Hepatocellular Carcinoma); LC-SPIK (Liver Cancer specific Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal); AFP (Alpha-Fetoprotein); NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease)

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Oncology and Oncogenics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.