Submitted:
19 February 2024
Posted:
20 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Descriptive Demographic Statistics


2.2. Awareness for Dogs Dewormer
2.3. Dewormer Source
2.3. Analysis of Determinants Which Influence Deworming among Dog Owning Households
2.3.1. Univariate Analysis
2.3.2. Multivariate Analysis
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Design
4.2. Household Questionnaire Survey on Deworming and Its Determinants
4.3. Data Management and Analysis
4.3.1. Preliminary Data Analysis Plan
4.3.2. Regression Analysis for Determinants for Helminth Treatment Seeking Behaviour
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kostopoulou, D.; Claerebout, E.; Arvanitis, D.; Ligda, P.; Voutzourakis, N.; Casaert, S.; Sotiraki, S. Abundance, Zoonotic Potential and Risk Factors of Intestinal Parasitism amongst Dog and Cat Populations: The Scenario of Crete, Greece. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varcasia, A.; Tamponi, C.; Ahmed, F.; Cappai, M.G.; Porcu, F.; Mehmood, N.; Dessì, G.; Scala, A. Taenia Multiceps Coenurosis: A Review. Parasit. Vectors 2022, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kulanthaivelu, K.; Bhat, M.D.; Prasad, C.; Srinivas, D.; Mhatre, R.; Nandeesh, B.N. Brain MRI Findings in Coenurosis: A Helminth Infection. J. Neuroimaging 2020, 30, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miran, M.B.; Kasuku, A.A.; Swai, E.S. Prevalence of Echinococcosis and Taenia Hydatigena Cysticercosis in Slaughtered Small Ruminants at the Livestock-Wildlife Interface Areas of Ngorongoro, Tanzania. Vet. World 2017, 10, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hughes, E.C.; Kibona, T.K.; de Glanville, W.A.; Lankester, F.; Davis, A.; Carter, R.W.; Jong, R.M.F.D.; Cleaveland, S.; Nyasebwa, O.M.; Claxton, J.; et al. Taenia Multiceps Coenurosis in Tanzania: A Major and under-Recognised Livestock Disease Problem in Pastoral Communities. Vet Rec. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asefa Deressa, T.T., Ayele Tadesse, Mekoro Beyene, Gashaw Gebrewold, Mahendra Pal. Assessment of Coenurus Cerebralis and Its Economic Impact in Sheep Brain Harvested at Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute, Ethiopia. Int. J. Livest. Res. 2012, 2, 217–226.
- CFSPH Taeniasis, Cysticercosis and Coenurosis 2020.
- Oryan, A.; Moazeni, M.; Amrabadi, O.; Akbari, M.; Sharifiyazdi, H. Comparison of Distribution Pattern, Pathogenesis and Molecular Characteristics of Larval Stages of Taenia Multiceps in Sheep and Goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, D.K.; Chauhan, P.P.S. Coenurosis Status in Afro-Asian Region : A Review. Small Rumin. Res. 2006, 64, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willis, J.M.; Herbert, I. V Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology Some Factors Affecting the Eggs of Taenia Multiceps : Their Transmission onto Pasture and Their Viability Some Factors Affecting the Eggs of Taenia Multiceps : Their Transmission onto Pasture and Their Viability. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1984, 78, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- TroCCAP Tropical Council for Companion Animal Parasites T roCCAP. 2018, 6–56.
- Moro, P.; Schantz, P.M. Echinococcosis: A Review. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 13, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kibona, T.; Buza, J.; Shirima, G.; Lankester, F.; Nzalawahe, J.; Lukambagire, A.-H.; Kreppel, K.; Hughes, E.; Allan, K.J.; Cleaveland, S. Taenia Multiceps in Northern Tanzania: An Important but Preventable Disease Problem in Pastoral and Agropastoral Farming Systems. Parasitologia 2022, 2, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czupryna, A.M.; Brown, J.S.; Bigambo, M.A.; Whelan, C.J.; Mehta, S.D.; Santymire, R.M.; Lankester, F.J.; Faust, L.J. Ecology and Demography of Free-Roaming Domestic Dogs in Rural Villages near Serengeti National Park in Tanzania. PLOS ONE 2016, 11, e0167092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ridwan, Y.; Sudarnika, E.; Dewi, T.I.T.; Budiono, N.G. Gastrointestinal Helminth Parasites of Pets: Retrospective Study at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia. Vet. World 2023, 1043–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Macpherson, C.N.L.; Torgerson, P.R. Dogs and Cestode Zoonoses. Dogs Zoonoses Public Health 2013, 127–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiferaw, A.; Abdela, N. Public Health and Economic Significance Cerebral Coenurosis in Sheep and Goat : A Review. Acta Parasitol. Glob. 2016, 7, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO The Control of Neglected Zoonotic Diseases A Route to Poverty Alleviation. 2006.
- de Glanville, W.A.; Davis, A.; Allan, K.J.; Buza, J.; Claxton, J.R.; Crump, J.A.; Halliday, J.E.B.; Johnson, P.C.D.; Kibona, T.J.; Mmbaga, B.T.; et al. Classification and Characterisation of Livestock Production Systems in Northern Tanzania. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, Y.; Rabe-Hesketh, S.; Dorie, V.; Gelman, A.; Liu, J. A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models. Psychometrika 2013, 78, 685–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McNeish, D. On Using Bayesian Methods to Address Small Sample Problems. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2016, 23, 750–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Dewormer type | Frequency | Percentages | 95% CI |
| Alben® (Albendazole) | 6 | 40.1 | 22.2-72.6 |
| Ascaten P® (Praziquantel) | 2 | 13.3 | 23.4-41.6 |
| Levafas diamond® and Nilzan® (Levamizole) | 7 | 46.6 | 17.4-67.1 |
| Suggested dewormer outlets | Frequency | Percentage (%) | 95% CI |
| Agrovet outside village (within the ward) | 32 | 51.6 | 38.7-64.3 |
| Agrovets within village | 14 | 22.6 | 13.3-35.3 |
| Agrovets at district Headquarter Market | 8 | 13.0 | 6.1-24.4 |
| Local regular market (within village) | 4 | 6.4 | 2.1-16.5 |
| Local regular markets (outside village) | 4 | 6.4 | 2.1-16.5 |
| Variable | Variable response | Univariate regression | |
| Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| Livestock systems | Agro-pastoral | Ref | |
| Pastoral | 1.01 (0.70-1.44) | 0.9635 | |
| Involved in herding | No | Ref | |
| Yes | 1.02 (0.8-1.3) | 0.8212 | |
| Awareness of dewormers | No | Ref | |
| Yes | 1.74 (0.68-1.62) | <0.001* | |
| Dogs per household | High (5-9) | Ref | |
| Low (1-4) | 1.05 (0.56-3.01) | ||
| Very high (≥10) | 1.00 (0.44-2.26) | 0.9595 | |
| Dewormer availability | Agrovet outside village (within the ward) | Ref | |
| Agrovets within village | 0.85(0.62-1.16) | ||
| Agrovets district HQ | 0.85 (0.58-1.25) | ||
| Local regular market (within village) | 0.85(0.51-1.42) | ||
| Local regular markets (outside village) | 0.52 (0.31-0.86) | 0.1627 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).