Submitted:
03 February 2024
Posted:
20 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. The main Research Questions
- How fMRI is used to model brain connectivity patterns?
- How can we classify the mapping of the human connectome using fMRI or MRI?
- Are fMRI-based approaches suitable for increasing resolution?
4. Hypothesis Research Methodology
5. Search Strategy
6. Method-Based Modeling of the Human Brain Using MATLAB
7. Human Connectome fMRI Analysis Algorithms
| Algorithm 1: EEG data mining optimization |
|
Input: A minimum imaging data CNN. Output: Optimization of the distance between neuro-images using graph theory. 1: compute = min data (applying a toolbox of Python for optimization of CNN data to compute) 2: M, do 2: Compute 3: end for 4: for all vertex vi 2 M, do 5: Compute the radius 6: end for 7: for all edge: 2 M, do 8: Compute the inverse 9: end for a |
2. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithms with PYTHON
| Algorithm 2: Box Approximation for (ANN) |
|
Input: Tolerances distance per neuron; D>0.5 Output: Lists L, and B of lower and upper bounds 1. procedure ANN (ε, τ, z, Z) 2. Initialize L = {z}, U = {Z}, done = false 3. done = true 4. Loop= L, 5. for l ∈ Loop, do 6. for 7. Solve (ANN (l, u)) with the optimal solution 8. and set 9. if d > 0.5 and then 10. Define step length, else 11. L = loop 12. U = loop 13. end |
| Algorithm 3: Support Vector Machine (SVM) |
| In machine learning, support vector machines (SVMs, also support-vector networks) are supervised learning models with associated learning algorithms that analyze data for classification and regression analysis. Input: c = fitcsvm (data3, the class, kernel Function),‘rbf’ Output: d =0.02; [x1Grid, x2Grid] = mesh grid(min(data3(:1)): d:max(data3(:1)), ... min(data3(,2)): d:max(data3(:2))); xGrid = [x1Grid (:), x2Grid (:)]; [~, scores] = predict (cl, xGrid); end |
8. Brain Imaging Neural Network fMRI Analysis
9. Computing the fMRI data using Python


10. Experiment
| TL Model | Test Accuracy | Test Loss | F1 Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNN | 94.12% | 0.23% | 93 |
| ANN | 96.66% | 0.18% | 96 |
| RNN | 90.30% | 0.27% | 89 |
| Paper | Classifier |
FC Modelling |
Method | number of samples | % Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Basti Bloom et al. 2006) | SVM | Static FC | normal distribution | 70 | 70.9 |
| (Farsten 2009) | K-MEANS | Dynamic FC | Covariance matrix | 105 | 76.4 |
| (Douglas, P. K., et al., 2013). | HCA | Dynamic FC | Linear regression | 173 | 80.1 |
| (Sporence Craddock et al., 2013). | SVM | Static FC | Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) | 249 | 86.9 |
| Zheng et al. (2015) | SVM | Static FC | The correlation matrix | 560 | 85.4 |
| (Algunaid, R. F., et al., 2018). | Kernel PCA | Static FC | Kernel PCA | 897 | 83.4 |
| (Baste Blooms et al., 2019) | CNN | Dynamic FC | Wavelet Coherence | 1003 | 88.1 |
| (Jung and Haier 2022) | CNN | Static FC | Locally-Linear Embedding (LLE) | 1000 | 86.12 |
| (Baltimore and Sporance Craddock et al., 2023) | CNN | Dynamic FC | Convolutional neural network (CNN) | 890 | 89.66 |
| (Suggested method) | ANN | Dynamic FC | DBSCANArtificial neural network (ANN) | 1500 | 91.8 |
11. Results
12. Discussion
13. Conclusions
Data Sets for Machine Learning
- DTI data set (unimodal data set): This contained only the DTI-derived metrics (20 features per subject). Therefore, it was considered a unimodal data set.
- GT data set (unimodal data set): This contains the 698 graph theoretical metrics per subject, derived from rs-fMRI images. This was also considered a unimodal data set.
- DTI + GT data set (multimodal data set): This was obtained by unifying (1) and (2) into a single data set, which resulted in 718 features per subject.
References
- Abós, A., Baggio, H. C., Segura, B., García-Díaz, A. I., Compta, Y., Marti, M. J., et al. (2017). Discriminating cognitive status in Parkinson’s disease through functional connectomes and machine learning. Sic; Rep. 7:45347. [CrossRef]
- 3 - Algunaid, R. F., Alumnae, A. H., Rushdie, M. A., and Yassin, I. A. (2018).
- The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 7, 270–279. [CrossRef]
- Bassett, D. S., and Bullmore. E. D. The neuroscientist, (2006). [CrossRef]
- Díez-cirarda, M., Strafella, A. P., Kim, J., Peña, J., and Ojeda, N. (2018). Dynamic functional connectivity in Parkinson’s, disease patients with mild cognitive impairment and normal cognition. Neuroimaging Clin. 17, 847–855. [CrossRef]
- Dixit, S., and Mosier, K. (2004). Analysis of cortical connectivity using Hopfield neural network. Neurocomputing 58, 1163–1170. [CrossRef]
- Dong, L., Wang, P., Peng, R., Jiang, S., Klugah-Brown, B., Luo, C., et al. (2016). Altered basal ganglia-cortical functional connections in frontal lobe epilepsy: a resting-state fMRI study. Epilepsy; Res. 128, 12–20. [CrossRef]
- Douglas, P. K., Lau, E., Anderson, A., Head, A., Kerr, W., Wollner, M., et al. (2013). Single-trial decoding of belief decision-making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features. Front. Hum. Neurosis. 7:392. [CrossRef]
- Ecker, C., Spooren, W., and Murphy, D. G. M. (2013). Translational approaches to the biology of Autism: false dawn or a new era. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 435–442. [CrossRef]
- Fleischer, V., Radetz, A., Ciolac, D., Muthuraman, M., Gonzalez-Escamilla, G., Zip, F., et al. (2017). Graph theoretical framework of brain networks in multiple sclerosis: a review of concepts. Neuroscience; 403, 35–53. [CrossRef]
- Finn, E. S., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., Rosenberg, M. D., Huang, J., Chun, M. M., et al. (2015). Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosis; 18, 1664–1671. [CrossRef]
- Gautama, T. and Van Hulle, M.M. (2004), Optimal Spatial Regularization of Autocorrelation Estimates in fMRI Analysis, Neuroimage, 23(3):1203-16. [CrossRef]
- Jung, R. E, Haier, R. J, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Volume 30, Issue 2, April 2007, pp. 135 - 154. [CrossRef]
- Hanif, Md Abu, et al. “Role of CBIR In a Different fields-An Empirical Review.” 2022 4th International Conférences on Artificiel Intelligence and Speech Technologie (AIST). IEEE, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Philippi, M., van den Heuvel, M. P., Fornito, A., He, Y., Hulshof Pol, H. E., Agosto, F., et al. (2013). Assessment of system dysfunction in the brain through MRI-based. Connectomes. Lancet Neurol. 12, 1189–1199. [CrossRef]
- Stringer, C., Pachitariu, M., 2019. Computational processing of neural recordings from calcium imaging data. Cur. Open. Neurobiology; 55, 22–31. [CrossRef]
- Vanwalleghem, C.; Constantin, L.; Scott, E.K. BMC biology, (2020). Calcium; imaging and the curse of negativity, bioRxiv. [CrossRef]
- Zuo, X. N., and Xing, X. X. (2014). Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomes: a systems neuroscience perspective. Neurosis. Biobehav. Rev. 45C, 100–118. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Zihao, et al. “Commodity Image Retrieval Method Based on CNN and Score Fusion.” 2021 International Conference on Culture-oriented Science & Technology (ICCST). IEEE, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Selvi RT, Muthulakshmi I (2020) Modelling the map reduce based optimal gradient boosted tree classification algorithm for diabetes mellitus diagnosis system. [CrossRef]
- Likhitha, Tata Lakshmi Durga, et al. “A Detailed Review on CBIR and Its Importance in Current Era.” 2021 International conférence on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA). IEEE, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Kannai, A., and Ravikumar Lanke. “Image Retrieval based on Deep Learning-Convolutional Neural Networks.” 2022 International Interdisciplinaire Humanitarian conférence for Sustainability (IIHC). IEEE, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Kannagi, A., and Ravi Kumar Lanke. “Image Retrieval based on Deep Learning-Convolutional Neural Networks.” 2022 International Interdisciplinary Humanitarisa conférence for Sustainability (IIHC). IEEE, 2022. [CrossRef]







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).